00008253132022FYfalse00008253132022-01-012022-12-3100008253132022-06-30iso4217:USD00008253132022-12-31xbrli:shares0000825313us-gaap:GeneralPartnerMember2022-12-3100008253132021-12-3100008253132021-01-012021-12-3100008253132020-01-012020-12-31iso4217:USDxbrli:shares0000825313us-gaap:GeneralPartnerMember2021-12-310000825313us-gaap:GeneralPartnerMember2020-12-310000825313us-gaap:GeneralPartnerMember2019-12-310000825313us-gaap:GeneralPartnerMember2022-01-012022-12-310000825313us-gaap:GeneralPartnerMember2021-01-012021-12-310000825313us-gaap:GeneralPartnerMember2020-01-012020-12-310000825313us-gaap:LimitedPartnerMember2021-12-310000825313us-gaap:LimitedPartnerMember2020-12-310000825313us-gaap:LimitedPartnerMember2019-12-310000825313us-gaap:LimitedPartnerMember2022-01-012022-12-310000825313us-gaap:LimitedPartnerMember2021-01-012021-12-310000825313us-gaap:LimitedPartnerMember2020-01-012020-12-310000825313us-gaap:LimitedPartnerMember2022-12-310000825313us-gaap:DeferredCompensationShareBasedPaymentsMember2021-12-310000825313us-gaap:DeferredCompensationShareBasedPaymentsMember2020-12-310000825313us-gaap:DeferredCompensationShareBasedPaymentsMember2019-12-310000825313us-gaap:DeferredCompensationShareBasedPaymentsMember2022-01-012022-12-310000825313us-gaap:DeferredCompensationShareBasedPaymentsMember2021-01-012021-12-310000825313us-gaap:DeferredCompensationShareBasedPaymentsMember2020-01-012020-12-310000825313us-gaap:DeferredCompensationShareBasedPaymentsMember2022-12-310000825313us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2021-12-310000825313us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2020-12-310000825313us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2019-12-310000825313us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2022-01-012022-12-310000825313us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2021-01-012021-12-310000825313us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2020-01-012020-12-310000825313us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2022-12-3100008253132020-12-3100008253132019-12-310000825313ab:EQHMemberab:ABHoldingMember2022-01-012022-12-31xbrli:pure0000825313ab:ABHoldingMemberab:AllianceBernsteinCorporationMember2022-12-310000825313ab:ABHoldingMemberab:AllianceBernsteinCorporationMember2022-01-012022-12-310000825313ab:EQHAndItsSubsidiariesMemberab:AllianceBernsteinCorporationMember2022-01-012022-12-310000825313ab:UnaffiliatedHoldersMemberab:AllianceBernsteinCorporationMember2022-01-012022-12-310000825313ab:AllianceBernsteinL.P.Memberab:AllianceBernsteinCorporationMember2022-01-012022-12-310000825313ab:AllianceBernsteinL.P.Memberab:EQHAndItsSubsidiariesMember2022-01-012022-12-310000825313us-gaap:SubsequentEventMember2023-02-082023-02-080000825313ab:EmployeesAndEligibleDirectorsMember2022-01-012022-12-3100008253132022-12-012022-12-310000825313ab:EmployeesAndEligibleDirectorsMember2021-01-012021-12-3100008253132021-12-012021-12-310000825313us-gaap:VariableInterestEntityPrimaryBeneficiaryMember2022-01-012022-12-310000825313us-gaap:VariableInterestEntityPrimaryBeneficiaryMember2021-01-012021-12-310000825313us-gaap:VariableInterestEntityPrimaryBeneficiaryMember2020-01-012020-12-3100008253132022-12-142022-12-14ab:plaintiff0000825313ab:CarValInvestorsLPMember2022-07-010000825313ab:CarValInvestorsLPMember2022-07-012022-07-010000825313ab:CarValInvestorsLPMember2022-11-012022-11-010000825313ab:CarValInvestorsLPMemberab:AllianceBernsteinL.P.Member2022-07-012022-07-010000825313ab:CarValInvestorsLPMemberab:AllianceBernsteinL.P.Member2022-07-010000825313ab:CarValInvestorsLPMemberab:InvestmentManagementContractsAndInvestorRelationshipsMembersrt:MinimumMember2022-07-012022-07-010000825313ab:CarValInvestorsLPMemberab:InvestmentManagementContractsAndInvestorRelationshipsMembersrt:MaximumMember2022-07-012022-07-010000825313ab:AllianceBernsteinL.P.Member2022-01-012022-12-310000825313ab:AllianceBernsteinL.P.Memberus-gaap:AllowanceForCreditLossMember2021-12-310000825313ab:AllianceBernsteinL.P.Memberus-gaap:AllowanceForCreditLossMember2022-01-012022-12-310000825313ab:AllianceBernsteinL.P.Memberus-gaap:AllowanceForCreditLossMember2022-12-310000825313ab:AllianceBernsteinL.P.Memberus-gaap:AllowanceForCreditLossMember2020-12-310000825313ab:AllianceBernsteinL.P.Memberus-gaap:AllowanceForCreditLossMember2021-01-012021-12-310000825313ab:AllianceBernsteinL.P.Memberus-gaap:AllowanceForCreditLossMember2019-12-310000825313ab:AllianceBernsteinL.P.Memberus-gaap:AllowanceForCreditLossMember2020-01-012020-12-31
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
☒ |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2022
OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
☐ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number 001-09818
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN HOLDING L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
13-3434400 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
501 Commerce Street, Nashville, TN
|
|
37203
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (615)
622-0000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class |
|
Trading Symbol |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
Units Rep. Assignments of Beneficial Ownership of LP Interests in
AB Holding ("Units") |
|
AB |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned
issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit such files). Yes
☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer,
smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See
definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”,
“smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer ☒
|
Accelerated filer ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer ☐ |
Smaller reporting company ☐
|
Emerging growth company ☐
|
|
|
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on
and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting under Section
404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the
registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit
report. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No
☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act,
indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the
registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an
error to previously issued financial statements.
☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are
restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based
compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers
during the relevant recovery period pursuant to
§240.10D-1(b).
☐
The aggregate market value of the units representing assignments of
beneficial ownership of limited partnership interests held by
non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which such
units were last sold on the New York Stock Exchange as of June 30,
2022 was approximately $3.8 billion.
The number of units representing assignments of beneficial
ownership of limited partnership interests outstanding as of
December 31, 2022 was 113,801,097. (This figure includes
100,000 general partnership units having economic interests
equivalent to the economic interests of the units representing
assignments of beneficial ownership of limited partnership
interests.)
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
This Form 10-K does not incorporate any document by
reference.
|
|
|
Glossary of Certain Defined Terms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AB |
AllianceBernstein L.P. (Delaware limited partnership formerly known
as Alliance Capital Management L.P., “Alliance
Capital”),
the operating partnership, and its subsidiaries and, where
appropriate, its predecessors, AB Holding and ACMC, Inc. and their
respective subsidiaries.
|
|
|
AB Holding |
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (Delaware limited
partnership). |
|
|
AB Holding Partnership Agreement |
the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AB
Holding, dated as of October 29, 1999 and as amended
February 24, 2006. |
|
|
AB Holding Units |
units representing assignments of beneficial ownership of limited
partnership interest in AB Holding. |
|
|
AB Partnership Agreement |
the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AB,
dated as of October 29, 1999 and as amended February 24,
2006. |
|
|
AB Units |
units of limited partnership interest in AB. |
|
|
AUM |
AB's assets under management. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernstein Transaction |
AB's acquisition of the business and assets of SCB Inc., formerly
known as Sanford C. Bernstein Inc., and the related assumption of
the liabilities of that business, completed on October 2,
2000. |
|
|
Equitable America |
Equitable Financial Insurance Company of America (f/k/a MONY Life
Insurance Company of America, an Arizona corporation), a subsidiary
of Equitable Holdings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equitable Financial |
Equitable Financial Life Insurance Company (New York stock life
insurance company), a subsidiary of Equitable Holdings. |
|
|
Equitable Holdings or EQH |
Equitable Holdings, Inc. (Delaware corporation) and its
subsidiaries other than AB and its subsidiaries. |
|
|
Exchange Act |
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
ERISA |
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as
amended. |
|
|
GAAP |
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. |
|
|
General Partner |
AllianceBernstein Corporation (Delaware corporation), the general
partner of AB and AB Holding and a subsidiary of Equitable
Holdings, and, where appropriate, ACMC, LLC, its
predecessor. |
|
|
Investment Advisers Act |
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. |
|
|
Investment Company Act |
the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. |
|
|
NYSE |
the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. |
|
|
Partnerships |
AB and AB Holding together. |
|
|
SEC |
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
|
Securities Act |
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. |
Item 1. Business
The words “we”
and “our”
in this Form 10-K refer collectively to AB Holding and AB and its
subsidiaries, or to their officers and employees. Similarly, the
words “company”
and “firm”
refer to both AB Holding and AB. Where the context requires
distinguishing between AB Holding and AB, we identify which company
is being discussed. Cross-references are in italics.
We use “global”
in this Form 10-K to refer to all nations, including the United
States; we use “international”
or “non-U.S.”
to refer to nations other than the United States.
We use “emerging
markets”
in this Form 10-K to refer to countries included in the Morgan
Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) emerging markets index,
which include, as of December 31, 2022: Brazil, Chile, China,
Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia,
Korea, Kuwait, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Qatar,
Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey and United
Arab Emirates.
Clients
We provide diversified investment management, research and related
services globally to a broad range of clients through our three
buy-side distribution channels: Institutions, Retail and Private
Wealth Management, and our sell-side business, Bernstein Research
Services. See
“Distribution Channels” in this Item 1
for additional information.
As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, our AUM were
approximately $646 billion, $779 billion and $686 billion,
respectively, and our net revenues were approximately
$4.1 billion, $4.4 billion and $3.7 billion,
respectively. EQH
(our parent company) and its subsidiaries, whose AUM consist
primarily of fixed income investments, is our largest client. Our
EQH affiliates represented approximately 16%, 17% and 19% of our
AUM as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, and we earned
approximately 4% of our net revenues from services we provided to
them in each of those years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Under Management (AUM)
($ billions)
|
Net Revenues
($ billions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See “Distribution Channels” below and “Assets Under Management” and
“Net Revenues” in Item 7
for additional information regarding our AUM and net
revenues.
Generally, we are compensated for our investment services on the
basis of investment advisory and services fees calculated as a
percentage of AUM. For additional information about our investment
advisory and services fees, including performance-based
fees,
see
“Risk
Factors”
in Item 1A and “Net Revenues – Investment Advisory and Services
Fees” in Item 7.
Research
Our high-quality, in-depth research is the foundation of our asset
management and private wealth management businesses. We believe
that our global team of research professionals, whose disciplines
include economic, fundamental equity, fixed income and quantitative
research, gives us a competitive advantage in achieving investment
success for our clients. We also have experts focused on
multi-asset strategies, wealth management, environmental, social
and governance (“ESG”),
and alternative investments.
Purpose, Values and Corporate Responsibility
At AB, we pursue insight that unlocks opportunity. This is our
firm's purpose. Together with our firm's mission and values, which
we have
described below,
our purpose forms the foundation of responsibility at
AB.
AB's mission is to help our clients define and achieve their
investment goals, explicitly stating what we do each day to unlock
opportunity for our clients. As an active manager, our
differentiated insights drive our ability to deliver alpha and
design innovative investment solutions. ESG and climate issues are
key elements in forming insights and in presenting potential risks
and opportunities that can impact the performance of the companies
and issuers in which we invest and the portfolios that
we build.
Our values provide a framework for the behaviors and actions that
deliver on our purpose and mission. Values align our actions. Each
value emerges from our firm's character, yet also is aspirational,
and each value challenges us to become a better, more responsible
version of AB:
•We
invest in each other, meaning that we have a strong organizational
culture in which diversity is celebrated and mentorship is critical
to our success.
•We
strive for distinctive insight, meaning that we collaboratively
identify creative solutions to clients' economic, ESG and
climate-related investment challenges through our expertise in a
wide range of investment disciplines.
•We
speak with courage and conviction, which informs how we engage with
our AB colleagues and issuers.
•We
act with integrity, which is the bedrock of our relationships and
drives us to avoid activities that could create potential conflicts
of interest or distract us from our singular focus to provide asset
management and research to our clients.
As noted above,
we consistently challenge ourselves to become a better version of
AB. We are committed to being a responsible firm and striving to
model the behavior that we expect from the companies in which we
invest. This means, in part, giving back to the communities in
which we work through our firm-wide philanthropic initiative, AB
Gives Back, and reducing our environmental footprint by increasing
our use of “green buildings,” such as our new corporate
headquarters in Nashville, Tennessee. Additionally, by promoting
diversity, equity and inclusion, we are afforded different
perspectives and ways of thinking, which can lead to better
outcomes for our clients (See
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion below in this Item
1).
Also, striving to be more responsible gives us a richer perspective
for evaluating other companies. As longtime fundamental investors
with a strong research heritage, we consider ESG factors in various
processes. This helps us make fully informed risk/return
assessments and draw insightful investment conclusions. Our
investors — research analysts and portfolio managers — understand
the companies and industries they cover in-depth. This positions
them well to determine which ESG issues are material to particular
companies, to determine the financial impact of an ESG issue and to
incorporate that insight into their cash-flow, earnings and credit
models. And, we continue to invest in technology and innovation to
further enable our investment teams to formalize their ESG
evaluations and share insights from our engagements with other
companies.
Additionally, AB has prioritized our employees' health and welfare
throughout the COVID-19 pandemic while ensuring that our firm has
continued to meet our fiduciary obligations and provide exceptional
client service and thoughtful investment advice. Furthermore,
COVID-19 is a prominent theme in engagement: it not only impacts
business models but also highlights corporate ESG practices. We are
advocating that issuers be responsible corporate citizens, and we
are working to better understand opportunities and threats,
including supply chain disruptions and inflationary pressures,
fueled by the pandemic.
We provide additional information in this regard in the AB
Responsibility Report, which can be found under “Responsibility -
Overview” on
www.alliancebernstein.com.
And, we have described our firm's governance structure, including
our Board and its committees, in Item 10 of this Form
10-K.
Investment Philosophy
We believe that by using differentiated research insights and a
disciplined process to build high-active-share portfolios, we can
achieve strong investment results for our clients over time. Key to
this philosophy is developing and integrating ESG and climate
research, as well as our approach to engagement. Our global
research network, intellectual curiosity and collaborative culture
allow us to advance clients' investment objectives, whether our
clients are seeking responsibility generated idiosyncratic alpha,
total return, downside mitigation, or sustainability and
impact-focused outcomes.
Our investment services include expertise in:
•Actively
managed equity strategies across global and regional universes, as
well as capitalization ranges, concentration ranges and investment
strategies, including value, growth and core
equities;
•Actively
managed traditional and unconstrained fixed income strategies,
including taxable and tax-exempt strategies;
•Actively
managed alternative investments, including hedge funds, fund of
funds and direct assets (e.g., direct lending, real estate and
private equity);
•Portfolios
with Purpose, including actively managed, impact-focused and
Responsible+ (climate-conscious, ESG leaders, change catalysts)
equity, fixed income and multi-asset strategies that address our
clients' evolving need to invest their capital with purpose while
pursuing strong investment returns;
•Multi-asset
services and solutions, including dynamic asset allocation,
customized target-date funds and target-risk
funds; and
•Some
passive management, including index, ESG index and enhanced index
strategies.
Our AUM by client domicile and investment service as of
December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUM by Client Domicile
($ in billions)
|
AUM by Investment Service
($ in billions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Channels
Institutions
We offer to our institutional clients, which include private and
public pension plans, foundations and endowments, insurance
companies, central banks and governments worldwide, and EQH and its
subsidiaries, separately managed accounts, sub-advisory
relationships, structured products, collective investment trusts,
mutual funds, hedge funds and other investment vehicles
(“Institutional
Services”).
We manage the assets of our institutional clients pursuant to
written investment management agreements or other arrangements,
which generally are terminable at any time or upon relatively short
notice by either party. In general, our written investment
management agreements may not be assigned without the client's
consent. For information about our institutional investment
advisory and services fees, including performance-based
fees,
see
“Risk
Factors”
in Item 1A and “Net Revenues – Investment Advisory and Services
Fees” in Item 7.
EQH and its subsidiaries constitute our largest institutional
client. EQH and its subsidiaries combined AUM accounted for
approximately 24%, 25% and 29% of our institutional AUM as of
December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and
approximately 19%, 18% and 18% of our institutional revenues for
2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. No single institutional client
other than EQH and its respective subsidiaries accounted for more
than approximately 2% of our net revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2022.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2022, EQH and its subsidiaries combined AUM
accounted for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately
24%
of our institutional AUM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately
19%
of our institutional revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQH and Subsidiaries as a % of our Institutional AUM |
EQH and Subsidiaries as a % of our Institutional
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, Institutional Services
represented approximately 46%, 43% and 46%, respectively, of our
AUM, and the fees we earned from providing these services
represented approximately 16%, 13% and 14%, respectively, of our
net revenues for each of those years. Our AUM and revenues are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
Institutional Services Assets Under Management
(by Investment Service)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31 |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
|
2022-21 |
2021-20 |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Actively Managed |
|
$ |
55,731 |
|
|
$ |
73,726 |
|
|
$ |
60,067 |
|
|
(24.4) |
% |
22.7 |
% |
Equity Passively Managed(1)
|
|
21,062 |
|
|
28,995 |
|
|
27,873 |
|
|
(27.4) |
|
4.0 |
|
Total Equity |
|
76,793 |
|
|
102,721 |
|
|
87,940 |
|
|
(25.2) |
|
16.8 |
|
U.S. |
|
35,428 |
|
|
47,409 |
|
|
41,241 |
|
|
(25.3) |
|
15.0 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
41,365 |
|
|
55,312 |
|
|
46,699 |
|
|
(25.2) |
|
18.4 |
|
Total Equity |
|
76,793 |
|
|
102,721 |
|
|
87,940 |
|
|
(25.2) |
|
16.8 |
|
Fixed Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Income Taxable |
|
121,871 |
|
|
155,940 |
|
|
164,048 |
|
|
(21.8) |
|
(4.9) |
|
Fixed Income Tax-Exempt |
|
849 |
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
(23.4) |
|
(12.8) |
|
Fixed Income Passively Managed(1)
|
|
192 |
|
|
224 |
|
|
84 |
|
|
(14.3) |
|
166.7 |
|
Total Fixed Income |
|
122,912 |
|
|
157,272 |
|
|
165,403 |
|
|
(21.8) |
|
(4.9) |
|
U.S. |
|
88,800 |
|
|
110,312 |
|
|
116,833 |
|
|
(19.5) |
|
(5.6) |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
34,112 |
|
|
46,960 |
|
|
48,570 |
|
|
(27.4) |
|
26.1 |
|
Total Fixed Income |
|
122,912 |
|
|
157,272 |
|
|
165,403 |
|
|
(21.8) |
|
(4.9) |
|
Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
12,873 |
|
|
7,697 |
|
|
6,104 |
|
|
67.2 |
|
26.1 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
84,703 |
|
|
69,390 |
|
|
56,151 |
|
|
22.1 |
|
23.6 |
|
Total Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions |
|
97,576 |
|
|
77,087 |
|
|
62,255 |
|
|
26.6 |
|
23.8 |
|
Total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
137,101 |
|
|
165,418 |
|
|
164,178 |
|
|
(17.1) |
|
0.8 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
160,180 |
|
|
171,662 |
|
|
151,420 |
|
|
(6.7) |
|
13.4 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
297,281 |
|
|
$ |
337,080 |
|
|
$ |
315,598 |
|
|
(11.8) |
|
6.8 |
|
Affiliated - EQH |
|
70,924 |
|
|
84,096 |
|
|
91,396 |
|
|
(15.7) |
|
(8.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliated |
|
226,357 |
|
|
252,984 |
|
|
224,202 |
|
|
(10.5) |
|
12.8 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
297,281 |
|
|
$ |
337,080 |
|
|
$ |
315,598 |
|
|
(11.8) |
|
6.8 |
|
(1)Includes
index and enhanced index services.
(2)Includes
certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity
or fixed income services.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Institutional Services
(by Investment Service)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31 |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
|
2022-21 |
2021-20 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Actively Managed |
|
$ |
220,917 |
|
|
$ |
240,049 |
|
|
$ |
170,802 |
|
|
(8.0) |
% |
40.5 |
% |
Equity Passively Managed(1)
|
|
4,910 |
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
5,851 |
|
|
(19.8) |
|
4.6 |
|
Total Equity |
|
225,827 |
|
|
246,168 |
|
|
176,653 |
|
|
(8.3) |
|
39.4 |
|
U.S. |
|
80,908 |
|
|
97,522 |
|
|
69,795 |
|
|
(17.0) |
|
39.7 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
144,919 |
|
|
148,646 |
|
|
106,858 |
|
|
(2.5) |
|
39.1 |
|
Total Equity |
|
225,827 |
|
|
246,168 |
|
|
176,653 |
|
|
(8.3) |
|
39.4 |
|
Fixed Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Income Taxable |
|
189,679 |
|
|
199,866 |
|
|
194,026 |
|
|
(5.1) |
|
3.0 |
|
Fixed Income Tax-Exempt |
|
1,182 |
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
(12.8) |
|
0.1 |
|
Fixed Income Passively Managed(1)
|
|
425 |
|
|
105 |
|
|
82 |
|
|
n/m |
28.0 |
|
Fixed Income Servicing(2)
|
|
15,991 |
|
|
14,738 |
|
|
14,108 |
|
|
8.5 |
|
4.5 |
|
Total Fixed Income |
|
207,277 |
|
|
216,065 |
|
|
209,571 |
|
|
(4.1) |
|
3.1 |
|
U.S. |
|
128,392 |
|
|
124,004 |
|
|
118,924 |
|
|
3.5 |
|
4.3 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
78,885 |
|
|
92,061 |
|
|
90,647 |
|
|
(14.3) |
|
1.6 |
|
Total Fixed Income |
|
207,277 |
|
|
216,065 |
|
|
209,571 |
|
|
(4.1) |
|
3.1 |
|
Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
114,982 |
|
|
64,646 |
|
|
52,222 |
|
|
77.9 |
|
23.8 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
111,202 |
|
|
59,179 |
|
|
73,354 |
|
|
87.9 |
|
(19.3) |
|
Total Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions |
|
226,184 |
|
|
123,825 |
|
|
125,576 |
|
|
82.7 |
|
(1.4) |
|
Total Investment Advisory and Services Fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
324,282 |
|
|
286,172 |
|
|
240,941 |
|
|
13.3 |
|
18.8 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
335,004 |
|
|
299,886 |
|
|
270,859 |
|
|
11.7 |
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
659,286 |
|
|
586,058 |
|
|
511,800 |
|
|
12.5 |
|
14.5 |
|
Distribution Revenues |
|
268 |
|
|
474 |
|
|
588 |
|
|
(43.5) |
|
(19.4) |
|
Shareholder Servicing Fees |
|
429 |
|
|
485 |
|
|
526 |
|
(11.5) |
|
(7.8) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
659,983 |
|
|
$ |
587,017 |
|
|
$ |
512,914 |
|
|
12.4 |
|
14.4 |
|
Affiliated - EQH |
|
125,229 |
|
|
105,415 |
|
|
90,101 |
|
|
18.8 |
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliated |
|
534,754 |
|
|
481,602 |
|
|
422,813 |
|
|
11.0 |
|
13.9 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
659,983 |
|
|
$ |
587,017 |
|
|
$ |
512,914 |
|
|
12.4 |
|
14.4 |
|
(1)Includes
index and enhanced index services.
(2)Fixed
Income Servicing includes advisory-related services fees that are
not based on AUM, including derivative transaction fees, capital
purchase program-related advisory services and other fixed income
advisory services.
(3)Includes
certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity
or fixed income services.
Retail
We provide investment management and related services to a wide
variety of individual retail investors globally through retail
mutual funds we sponsor, mutual fund sub-advisory relationships,
separately-managed account programs (see
below),
and other investment vehicles (“Retail
Products and Services”).
We distribute our Retail Products and Services through financial
intermediaries, including broker-dealers, insurance sales
representatives, banks, registered investment advisers and
financial planners. These products and services include open-end
and closed-end funds that are either (i) registered as investment
companies under the Investment Company Act (“U.S.
Funds”),
or (ii) not registered under the Investment Company Act and
generally not offered to U.S. persons (“Non-U.S.
Funds”
and, collectively with the U.S. Funds, “AB
Funds”).
They also include separately-managed account programs, which are
sponsored by financial intermediaries and generally charge an
all-inclusive fee covering investment management, trade execution,
asset allocation, and custodial and administrative services. In
addition, we provide distribution, shareholder servicing, transfer
agency services and administrative services for our Retail Products
and Services.
See “Net Revenues – Investment Advisory and Services Fees” in Item
7
for information about our retail investment advisory and services
fees. See
Note 2 to AB’s consolidated financial statements in Item 8
for a discussion of the commissions we pay to financial
intermediaries in connection with the sale of open-end AB
Funds.
Fees paid by the U.S. Funds are reflected in the applicable
investment management agreement, which generally must be approved
annually by the board of directors or trustees of those funds, by a
majority vote of the independent directors or trustees. Increases
in these fees must be approved by fund shareholders; decreases need
not be, including any decreases implemented by a fund’s directors
or trustees. In general, each investment management agreement with
the U.S. Funds provides for termination by either party, at
any time, upon 60 days’ notice.
Fees paid by Non-U.S. Funds are reflected in management agreements
that continue until they are terminated. Increases in these fees
generally must be approved by the relevant regulatory authority,
depending on the domicile and structure of the fund, and Non-U.S.
Fund shareholders must be given advance notice of any fee
increases.
The mutual funds we sub-advise for EQH and its subsidiaries
constitute our largest retail client. EQH and its subsidiaries
accounted for approximately 14% of our retail AUM as of
December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 and approximately 1% of our
retail net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2022,
2021 and 2020.
Most open-end U.S. Funds have adopted a plan under Rule 12b-1 of
the Investment Company Act that allows the fund to pay, out of
assets of the fund, distribution and service fees for the
distribution and sale of its shares. The open-end U.S. Funds have
entered into such agreements with us, and we have entered into
selling and distribution agreements pursuant to which we pay sales
commissions to the financial intermediaries that distribute our
open-end U.S. Funds. These agreements are terminable by either
party upon notice (generally 30 days) and do not obligate the
financial intermediary to sell any specific amount of
fund shares.
As of December 31, 2022, retail U.S. Fund AUM were
approximately $54 billion, or 22% of retail AUM, as compared to $73
billion, or 23%, as of December 31, 2021, and $62 billion, or
23%, as of December 31, 2020. Non-U.S. Fund AUM, as of
December 31, 2022, totaled $96 billion, or 39% of retail AUM,
as compared to $130 billion, or 41%, as of December 31, 2021,
and $110 billion, or 41%, as of December 31,
2020.
Our Retail Services represented approximately 38%, 41% and 39% of
our AUM as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively,
and the fees we earned from providing these services represented
approximately 49%, 50% and 49% of our net revenues for the years
ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Our AUM
and revenues are as follows:
|
|
|
|
Retail Services Assets Under Management
(by Investment Service)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31 |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
|
2022-21 |
2021-20 |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Actively Managed |
|
$ |
116,235 |
|
|
$ |
154,200 |
|
|
$ |
106,866 |
|
|
(24.6) |
% |
44.3 |
% |
Equity Passively Managed(1)
|
|
30,445 |
|
|
40,821 |
|
|
35,995 |
|
|
(25.4) |
|
13.4 |
|
Total Equity |
|
146,680 |
|
|
195,021 |
|
|
142,861 |
|
|
(24.8) |
|
36.5 |
|
U.S. |
|
118,547 |
|
|
152,106 |
|
|
108,506 |
|
|
(22.1) |
|
40.2 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
28,133 |
|
|
42,915 |
|
|
34,355 |
|
|
(34.4) |
|
24.9 |
|
Total Equity |
|
146,680 |
|
|
195,021 |
|
|
142,861 |
|
|
(24.8) |
|
36.5 |
|
Fixed Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Income Taxable |
|
53,995 |
|
|
75,813 |
|
|
84,654 |
|
|
(28.8) |
|
(10.4) |
|
Fixed Income Tax-Exempt |
|
26,714 |
|
|
29,009 |
|
|
23,202 |
|
|
(7.9) |
|
25.0 |
|
Fixed Income Passively Managed(1)
|
|
9,206 |
|
|
12,762 |
|
|
8,231 |
|
|
(27.9) |
|
55.0 |
|
Total Fixed Income |
|
89,915 |
|
|
117,584 |
|
|
116,087 |
|
|
(23.5) |
|
1.3 |
|
U.S. |
|
41,151 |
|
|
46,361 |
|
|
36,137 |
|
|
(11.2) |
|
28.3 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
48,764 |
|
|
71,223 |
|
|
79,950 |
|
|
(31.5) |
|
(10.9) |
|
Total Fixed Income |
|
89,915 |
|
|
117,584 |
|
|
116,087 |
|
|
(23.5) |
|
1.3 |
|
Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
2,697 |
|
|
3,595 |
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
(25.0) |
|
17.1 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
3,594 |
|
|
3,718 |
|
|
3,321 |
|
|
(3.3) |
|
12.0 |
|
Total Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions |
|
6,291 |
|
|
7,313 |
|
|
6,392 |
|
|
(14.0) |
|
14.4 |
|
Total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
162,395 |
|
|
202,062 |
|
|
147,714 |
|
|
(19.6) |
|
36.8 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
80,491 |
|
|
117,856 |
|
|
117,626 |
|
|
(31.7) |
|
0.2 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
242,886 |
|
|
$ |
319,918 |
|
|
$ |
265,340 |
|
|
(24.1) |
|
20.6 |
|
Affiliated - EQH |
|
34,110 |
|
|
44,417 |
|
|
36,765 |
|
|
(23.2) |
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliated |
|
208,776 |
|
|
275,501 |
|
|
228,575 |
|
|
(24.2) |
|
20.5 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
242,886 |
|
|
$ |
319,918 |
|
|
$ |
265,340 |
|
|
(24.1) |
|
20.6 |
|
(1)Includes
index and enhanced index services.
(2)Includes
certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity
or fixed income services
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Retail Services
(by Investment Service)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31 |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
|
2022-21 |
2021-20 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Actively Managed |
|
$ |
746,889 |
|
|
$ |
766,578 |
|
|
$ |
508,973 |
|
|
(2.6) |
% |
50.6 |
% |
Equity Passively Managed(1)
|
|
12,870 |
|
|
14,773 |
|
|
14,347 |
|
|
(12.9) |
|
3.0 |
|
Total Equity |
|
759,759 |
|
|
781,351 |
|
|
523,320 |
|
|
(2.8) |
|
49.3 |
|
U.S. |
|
558,319 |
|
|
556,398 |
|
|
355,542 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
56.5 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
201,440 |
|
|
224,953 |
|
|
167,778 |
|
|
(10.5) |
|
34.1 |
|
Total Equity |
|
759,759 |
|
|
781,351 |
|
|
523,320 |
|
|
(2.8) |
|
49.3 |
|
Fixed Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Income Taxable |
|
390,708 |
|
|
517,327 |
|
|
534,164 |
|
|
(24.5) |
|
(3.2) |
|
Fixed Income Tax-Exempt |
|
89,450 |
|
|
84,945 |
|
|
70,734 |
|
|
5.3 |
|
20.1 |
|
Fixed Income Passively Managed(1)
|
|
13,682 |
|
|
12,994 |
|
|
12,229 |
|
|
5.3 |
|
6.3 |
|
Total Fixed Income |
|
493,840 |
|
|
615,266 |
|
|
617,127 |
|
|
(19.7) |
|
(0.3) |
|
U.S. |
|
119,053 |
|
|
115,248 |
|
|
101,825 |
|
|
3.3 |
|
13.2 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
374,787 |
|
|
500,018 |
|
|
515,302 |
|
|
(25.0) |
|
(3.0) |
|
Total Fixed Income |
|
493,840 |
|
|
615,266 |
|
|
617,127 |
|
|
(19.7) |
|
(0.3) |
|
Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
55,356 |
|
|
81,872 |
|
|
57,069 |
|
|
(32.4) |
|
43.5 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
13,484 |
|
|
13,117 |
|
|
12,723 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
3.1 |
|
Total Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions |
|
68,840 |
|
|
94,989 |
|
|
69,792 |
|
|
(27.5) |
|
36.1 |
|
Total Investment Advisory and Services Fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
732,728 |
|
|
753,518 |
|
|
514,436 |
|
|
(2.8) |
|
46.5 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
589,711 |
|
|
738,086 |
|
|
695,803 |
|
|
(20.1) |
|
6.1 |
|
Consolidated company-sponsored investment funds |
|
770 |
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
733 |
|
|
(38.1) |
|
69.6 |
|
Total |
|
1,323,209 |
|
|
1,492,847 |
|
|
1,210,972 |
|
|
(11.4) |
|
23.3 |
|
Distribution Revenues |
|
594,431 |
|
|
644,125 |
|
|
522,056 |
|
|
(7.7) |
|
23.4 |
|
Shareholder Servicing Fees |
|
83,268 |
|
|
86,857 |
|
|
78,920 |
|
|
(4.1) |
|
10.1 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,000,908 |
|
|
$ |
2,223,829 |
|
|
$ |
1,811,948 |
|
|
(10.0) |
|
22.7 |
|
Affiliated - EQH |
|
23,836 |
|
|
28,334 |
|
|
27,130 |
|
|
(15.9) |
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-affiliated |
|
1,977,072 |
|
|
2,195,495 |
|
|
1,784,818 |
|
|
(9.9) |
|
23.0 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,000,908 |
|
|
$ |
2,223,829 |
|
|
$ |
1,811,948 |
|
|
(10.0) |
|
22.7 |
|
(1)Includes
index and enhanced index services.
(2)Includes
certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity
or fixed income services.
Private Wealth Management
We partner with our clients, embracing innovation and research to
address increasingly complex challenges. Our clients include
high-net-worth individuals and families who have created
generational wealth as successful business owners, athletes,
entertainers, corporate executives and private practice owners. We
also provide investment and wealth advice to foundations and
endowments, family offices and other entities. Our flexible and
extensive investment platform offers a range of solutions,
including separately-managed accounts, hedge funds, mutual funds
and other investment vehicles, tailored to meet each distinct
client's needs. Our investment platform is complimented with a
wealth platform that includes complex tax and estate planning,
pre-IPO and pre-transaction planning, multi-generational family
engagement, and philanthropic advice in addition to tailored
approaches to meeting the unique needs of emerging wealth and
multi-cultural demographics ("Private
Wealth Services").
We manage accounts pursuant to written investment advisory
agreements, which generally are terminable at any time or upon
relatively short notice by any authorized party, and may not be
assigned without the client's consent. For information about our
investment advisory and services fees, including performance-based
fees,
see
“Risk
Factors”
in Item 1A and “Net Revenues – Investment Advisory and Services
Fees” in Item 7.
Our Private Wealth Services represented approximately 16%, 16% and
15% of our AUM as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020,
respectively. The fees we earned from providing these services
represented approximately 25%, 25% and 24% of our net revenues for
2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Our AUM and revenues are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
Private Wealth Services Assets Under Management
(by Investment Service)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31 |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
|
2022-21 |
2021-20 |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Actively Managed |
|
$ |
45,977 |
|
|
$ |
59,709 |
|
|
$ |
50,854 |
|
|
(23.0) |
% |
17.4 |
% |
Equity Passively Managed(1)
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
666 |
|
|
30.6 |
% |
164.9 |
% |
Total Equity |
|
48,281 |
|
|
61,473 |
|
|
51,520 |
|
|
(21.5) |
|
19.3 |
|
U.S. |
|
28,014 |
|
|
35,014 |
|
|
28,776 |
|
|
(20.0) |
|
21.7 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
20,267 |
|
|
26,459 |
|
|
22,744 |
|
|
(23.4) |
|
16.3 |
|
Total Equity |
|
48,281 |
|
|
61,473 |
|
|
51,520 |
|
|
(21.5) |
|
19.3 |
|
Fixed Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Income Taxable |
|
14,391 |
|
|
14,567 |
|
|
14,515 |
|
|
(1.2) |
|
0.4 |
|
Fixed Income Tax-Exempt |
|
24,953 |
|
|
26,929 |
|
|
25,764 |
|
|
(7.3) |
|
4.5 |
|
Fixed Income Passively Managed(1)
|
|
2 |
|
|
230 |
|
|
195 |
|
|
(99.1) |
|
17.9 |
|
Total Fixed Income |
|
39,346 |
|
|
41,726 |
|
|
40,474 |
|
|
(5.7) |
|
3.1 |
|
U.S. |
|
34,764 |
|
|
36,166 |
|
|
35,042 |
|
|
(3.9) |
|
3.2 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
4,582 |
|
|
5,561 |
|
|
5,432 |
|
|
(17.6) |
|
2.4 |
|
Total Fixed Income |
|
39,346 |
|
|
41,727 |
|
|
40,474 |
|
|
(5.7) |
|
3.1 |
|
Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
6,607 |
|
|
6,926 |
|
|
5,927 |
|
|
(4.6) |
|
16.9 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
12,021 |
|
|
11,446 |
|
|
7,064 |
|
|
5.0 |
|
62.0 |
|
Total Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions |
|
18,628 |
|
|
18,372 |
|
|
12,991 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
41.4 |
|
Total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
69,385 |
|
|
78,106 |
|
|
69,745 |
|
|
(11.2) |
|
12.0 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
36,870 |
|
|
43,466 |
|
|
35,240 |
|
|
(15.2) |
|
23.3 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
106,255 |
|
|
$ |
121,572 |
|
|
$ |
104,985 |
|
|
(12.6) |
|
15.8 |
|
(1)Includes
index and enhanced index services.
(2)Includes
certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity
or fixed income services.
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Private Wealth Services
(by Investment Service)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31 |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
|
2022-21 |
2021-20 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Actively Managed |
|
$ |
521,155 |
|
|
$ |
584,455 |
|
|
$ |
487,899 |
|
|
(10.8) |
% |
19.8 |
% |
Equity Passively Managed(1)
|
|
8,700 |
|
|
4,780 |
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
82.0 |
% |
n/m |
Total Equity |
|
529,855 |
|
|
589,235 |
|
|
489,012 |
|
|
(10.1) |
|
20.5 |
|
U.S. |
|
295,235 |
|
|
325,154 |
|
|
263,938 |
|
|
(9.2) |
|
23.2 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
234,620 |
|
|
264,081 |
|
|
225,074 |
|
|
(11.2) |
|
17.3 |
|
Total Equity |
|
529,855 |
|
|
589,235 |
|
|
489,012 |
|
|
(10.1) |
|
20.5 |
|
Fixed Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Income Taxable |
|
66,851 |
|
|
72,404 |
|
|
71,575 |
|
|
(7.7) |
|
1.2 |
|
Fixed Income Tax-Exempt |
|
125,123 |
|
|
130,391 |
|
|
123,952 |
|
|
(4.0) |
|
5.2 |
|
Fixed Income Passively Managed(1)
|
|
1,804 |
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
2,891 |
|
|
(31.5) |
|
(8.9) |
|
Total Fixed Income |
|
193,778 |
|
|
205,429 |
|
|
198,418 |
|
|
(5.7) |
|
3.5 |
|
U.S. |
|
159,411 |
|
|
167,402 |
|
|
160,666 |
|
|
(4.8) |
|
4.2 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
34,367 |
|
|
38,027 |
|
|
37,752 |
|
|
(9.6) |
|
0.7 |
|
Total Fixed Income |
|
193,778 |
|
|
205,429 |
|
|
198,418 |
|
|
(5.7) |
|
3.5 |
|
Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
195,666 |
|
|
249,432 |
|
|
109,169 |
|
|
(21.6) |
|
128.5 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
69,245 |
|
|
71,524 |
|
|
76,065 |
|
|
(3.2) |
|
(6.0) |
|
Total Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions |
|
264,911 |
|
|
320,956 |
|
|
185,234 |
|
|
(17.5) |
|
73.3 |
|
Total Investment Advisory and Services Fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
650,311 |
|
|
741,987 |
|
|
533,773 |
|
|
(12.4) |
|
39.0 |
|
Global & Non-US |
|
338,232 |
|
|
373,632 |
|
|
338,891 |
|
|
(9.5) |
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
988,543 |
|
|
1,115,619 |
|
|
872,664 |
|
|
(11.4) |
|
27.8 |
|
Distribution Revenues |
|
12,496 |
|
|
7,641 |
|
|
7,137 |
|
|
63.5 |
|
7.1 |
|
Shareholder Servicing Fees |
|
2,964 |
|
|
2,882 |
|
|
2,871 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
0.4 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,004,003 |
|
|
$ |
1,126,142 |
|
|
$ |
882,672 |
|
|
(10.8) |
|
27.6 |
|
(1)Includes
index and enhanced index services.
(2)Includes
certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity
or fixed income services.
Bernstein Research Services
We offer high-quality fundamental and quantitative research and
trade execution services in equities and listed options to
institutional investors, such as mutual fund and hedge fund
managers, pension funds and other institutional investors
("Bernstein
Research Services"
or "BRS").
We serve our clients, which are based in major markets around the
world, through our trading professionals, who are primarily based
in New York, London and Hong Kong, and our research analysts, who
provide fundamental company and industry research along with
quantitative research into securities valuation and factors
affecting stock-price movements.
Additionally, we occasionally provide equity capital markets
services to issuers of publicly traded securities, such as initial
public offerings and follow-on offerings, generally acting as
co-manager in such offerings.
We earn revenues for providing investment research to, and
executing brokerage transactions for, institutional clients. These
clients compensate us principally by directing us to execute
brokerage transactions on their behalf, for which we earn
commissions, and to a lesser but increasing extent, by paying us
directly for research through commission sharing agreements or cash
payments. Bernstein Research Services accounted for approximately
10%, 10% and 12% of our net revenues for the years ended
December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
For information regarding trends in fee rates charged for brokerage
transactions,
see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A.
In the fourth quarter of 2022, AB and
Société Générale (EURONEXT: SCGLY, “SocGen”),
a leading European bank, announced plans to form a joint venture
combining their respective cash equities and research businesses.
As a result, the BRS business has been classified as held for sale.
For further discussion, see
Note 24 Acquisitions and Divestitures to AB's consolidated
financial statements in Item 8.
Our Bernstein Research Services revenues are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Bernstein Research Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31 |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
|
2022-21 |
2021-20 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
Bernstein Research Services |
|
$ |
416,273 |
|
|
$ |
452,017 |
|
|
$ |
459,744 |
|
|
(7.9) |
% |
(1.7) |
% |
Custody
Our U.S. based broker-dealer subsidiary acts as custodian for the
majority of our Private Wealth Management AUM and some of our
Institutional AUM. Other custodian arrangements, directed by
clients, include banks, trust companies, brokerage firms and other
financial institutions.
People Management
As a leading global investment management and research firm, we
bring together a wide range of insights, expertise and innovations
to advance the interests of our clients around the world. The
intellectual capital and distinctive knowledge of our employees are
collectively the most important assets of our firm, so the
long-term sustainability and success of our firm is heavily
dependent on our people. In 2022, our human capital and
administrative services teams became our "People" team, a key
acknowledgement of the central role they play in supporting our
employees and advancing their work experience. We are keenly
focused on:
•fostering
an inclusive culture by incorporating diversity, equity and
inclusion in all levels of our business;
•encouraging
innovation;
•developing,
retaining and recruiting high quality talent; and
•aligning
employees’ incentives and risk taking with those of the
firm.
As a result, we have a strong firm culture that helps us maximize
performance and drive excellence. Further, our firm’s role as a
fiduciary is embedded in our culture. As a fiduciary, our firm’s
primary objective is to act in our clients' best interests and help
them reach their financial goals.
Also, our Board of Directors (the "Board")
and committees of the Board, particularly our Compensation and
Workplace Practices Committee, provide oversight into various
matters affecting our people, including emerging people management
risks and strategies to mitigate our exposure to those risks.
Furthermore, our Board and Board committees evaluate the overall
effectiveness of our social responsibility policies, goals and
programs and recommend changes to management as necessary. These
collaborative efforts contribute to the overall framework that
guides how AB attracts, retains and develops a workforce that
supports our values and strategic initiatives.
Talent Acquisition
AB seeks to achieve excellence in business and investment
performance by recruiting and hiring a workforce with diversity of
thought, backgrounds and experiences. We believe that diverse and
inclusive teams generate better ideas and reach more balanced
decisions. We seek to leverage the unique backgrounds of our
employees to meet the needs of a broad range of clients and engage
with the communities in which we operate. We engage several
external organizations to assist in attracting and recruiting top
talent at all levels, with a particular focus on attracting diverse
talent. We have a sizable group of internal talent acquisition
associates focused on recruiting, and we have implemented various
people-related initiatives to develop and provide for a balanced
workforce. Additionally, we offer internship programs for students
to work in positions across functional areas of the firm, and an
important part of our emerging talent and post-graduate recruitment
strategy is to convert a high percentage of our interns into
full-time employees.
Employee Engagement
We believe a workforce is most productive, effective and highly
engaged when they feel connected to our business and culture. We
seek to provide diverse work experiences, professional development
opportunities, competitive compensation and benefits, an inclusive
and diverse culture and social engagement projects to keep our
employees motivated, connected to our firm and engaged throughout
their careers. We strive to create a culture of intellectual
curiosity and collaboration, creating an environment where our
employees can thrive and do their best work. We foster growth and
advancement through different training avenues to develop skill
sets, create opportunities for networking, both internally and
externally, and we encourage internal mobility as a part of our
employees' career trajectory.
It is important that our employees are not only connected to our
business but also to the communities in which we operate. As such,
AB offers many opportunities for our employees to volunteer in the
communities in which we serve, including our firm-wide
philanthropic initiative, AB Gives Back. Other initiatives in
support of these objectives include a five-year refresh award,
whereby employees receive two additional weeks off for every five
years of service. In addition, we utilize AB Voice, a periodic
survey designed to measure employee satisfaction and engagement,
allowing us to identify and address performance gaps.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
Our continued commitment to Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
("DEI")
across all facets of our firm aligns with broader industry
recognition of the workplace as both a working and learning
community. We believe that our company plays a critical role in
empowering our people though purpose and fostering an inclusive,
collaborative environment and equitable culture that allows for
connectivity, belonging and success at every level.
A key element of our ongoing journey has been to adapt as
appropriate to evolving DEI industry trends. In 2022, we formally
incorporated the concept of "equity" into our strategy and team
name in an effort to more accurately reflect our current and
anticipated approach.
Our firm's community engagement efforts have been further
integrated under the DEI umbrella. To support our grantee and
community partners, bolster our commitment to our non-profit
clients, and add value for our current and future employees, our
approach leverages four programs under the "AB Gives Back" brand:
philanthropy, volunteering, board participation and gift matching.
Some highlights include improved student attendance and financial
literacy in inner city neighborhoods and over 3,000 employee
volunteer hours completed in 2022.
We have enhanced our talent attraction and retention approach to
position ourselves as an employer of choice and increase investment
in our people. We have developed a diverse talent strategy with a
goal of gaining a deeper understanding of the needs of diverse
talent and also equipping managers with the necessary tools to
effectively manage an increasingly diverse workforce. The strategy
includes incorporating the concept of inclusive leadership into the
firm-wide leadership development curriculum and providing
opportunities to build relationships across the firm at all
levels.
Finally, our people remain our top priority. Over the course of the
last year, there has been a continued focus on education and
deepening engagement across all pillars of our strategy to include
Employee Resource Groups ("ERGs"),
corporate partnerships, and the overall experience at AB. ERGs have
been a major proponent of these efforts by cultivating spaces for
courageous conversations, encouraging professional development and
personal wellness, and raising awareness for various
underrepresented communities.
Compensation and Benefits
We consistently invest in our workforce by offering competitive
compensation. We utilize a variety of compensation elements,
including base salaries, annual short-term compensation awards
(i.e., cash bonuses) and, for those of our employees who earn more
than $300,000 annually, a long-term compensation award program.
Long-term incentive compensation awards generally are denominated
in restricted AB Holding Units. We utilize this structure to foster
a stronger sense of ownership and align the interests of our
employees directly with the interests of our Unitholders and
indirectly with the interests of our clients, as strong performance
for our clients generally contributes directly to increases in AUM
and improved financial performance for the firm. Furthermore, in
the U.S. (and elsewhere, although benefits may differ by
jurisdiction):
•We
provide employee wages that are competitive and consistent with
employee positions, skill levels, performance, experience,
knowledge and geographic location.
•We
engage nationally recognized compensation and benefits consulting
firms to independently evaluate the effectiveness of our executive
compensation and benefit programs, as well as consulting services
relating to the amount and form of compensation paid to employees
other than executives, and to provide benchmarking against our
industry peers; this process also includes engagement of outside
counsel to conduct privileged pay equity reviews to ensure ongoing
compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
•We
provide merit-based and cost of living annual salary increases, as
well as incentive compensation, which are communicated to employees
at year-end and documented through our annual review procedures,
upon internal transfer and/or promotion; and
•The
firm makes benefits available to all eligible employees, including
a flexible in-office work schedule that permits working remotely
two days weekly, health and prescription insurance, paid and unpaid
leaves, a retirement plan, and life and disability/accident
coverage. We also offer a variety of voluntary benefits that allow
employees to select the options that meet their needs, including
flexible time-off, paid parental leave, adoption and surrogacy
assistance, tuition reimbursement, and a health and financial
wellness program.
Health, Safety and Flexibility for our Workforce
During 2020, at the onset of COVID, we mobilized to ensure the
health and safety of our employees globally. We implemented
business continuity measures, including travel restrictions and a
work-from-home requirement for almost all personnel (other than a
relatively small number of employees whose physical presence in our
offices was considered critical), which lasted through the second
quarter of 2021. Then, while continuing to closely monitor
COVID-related conditions globally, we developed return-to-office
programs tailored locally, so that employees could feel safe
knowing that their health, and the health of their families, were a
priority. This meant a staggered return to the office so that we
could monitor data while complying with local
ordinances.
Beginning in July 2021, in the U.S. we returned to the office three
days a week, alternating weeks through the end of 2021. In early
2022, while most of our employees returned to the office full-time,
we offered employees the ability to work remotely up to two days
per week given the ability and diligence our employees demonstrated
while working remotely. By the end of 2022, all employees had
returned to the office utilizing a hybrid work schedule, including
the flexibility to work remotely up to two days per week. We
believe this approach allows our employees to maintain the
important benefits of in-person collaboration while providing
greater work-life balance.
Employees
As of December 31, 2022, our firm had 4,436 full-time
employees, including 203 AB CarVal employees, compared to 4,118
full-time employees as of December 31, 2021, representing a 7.7%
increase (a 2.8% increase excluding AB CarVal).
As of December 31, 2022, our employees reflected the following
characteristics and locations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region: |
Female |
% Female |
Male |
% Male |
Grand Total |
% of Total |
Americas |
1,164 |
26 |
% |
2,099 |
47 |
% |
3,263 |
74 |
% |
Asia ex Japan |
234 |
5 |
% |
227 |
5 |
% |
461 |
10 |
% |
EMEA |
221 |
5 |
% |
377 |
9 |
% |
598 |
14 |
% |
Japan |
56 |
2 |
% |
43 |
1 |
% |
99 |
2 |
% |
Grand Total(1)
(2)
|
1,675 |
38 |
% |
2,746 |
62 |
% |
4,421 |
100 |
% |
(1)The
table above only reflects employees who have self-reported as male
or female and as such does not reconcile to our total of 4,436
full-time employees.
(2)The
methodology utilized to populate the table above changed from the
prior year. Specifically, while in 2021 we presented the total
percentage of female and male full-time employees by region who
self-reported, in the above table we present the total percentage
of female and male full-time employees by region, as a percentage
of total global full-time employees, who
self-reported.
In connection with our establishing 1,250 roles in Nashville,
Tennessee, we have relocated many of our employees from our New
York City and White Plains, New York, locations. Employees whose
roles are in-scope for the move, but who are not relocating,
receive a separation package. We expect layoffs to continue on a
rolling basis until all in-scope roles are filled
in Nashville.
Information about our Executive Officers
Please refer to "Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and
Corporate Governance" below
for information relating to our firm's executive
officers.
Service Marks
We have registered a number of service marks with the U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office and various foreign trademark offices,
including the mark “AllianceBernstein.” The logo set forth below is
a service mark of AB:
In 2015, we established a new brand identity by prominently
incorporating “AB” into our brand architecture, while maintaining
the legal names of our corporate entities. With this and other
related refinements, our company, and our Institutional and Retail
businesses, are referred to as “AllianceBernstein (AB)” or simply
“AB.” Private Wealth Management and Bernstein Research Services are
referred to as “AB Bernstein.” Also, we adopted the logo service
mark
described above.
In connection with the Bernstein Transaction, we acquired all of
the rights in, and title to, the Bernstein service marks, including
the mark “Bernstein.”
Service marks are generally valid and may be renewed indefinitely,
as long as they are in use and/or their registrations are properly
maintained.
Regulation
Virtually all aspects of our business are subject to various
federal and state laws and regulations, rules of various securities
regulators and exchanges, and laws in the foreign countries in
which our subsidiaries conduct business. These laws and regulations
primarily are intended to protect clients and fund shareholders and
generally grant supervisory agencies broad administrative powers,
including the power to limit or restrict the carrying on of
business for failure to comply with such laws and regulations.
Possible sanctions that may be imposed on us include the suspension
of individual employees, limitations on engaging in business for
specific periods, the revocation of the registration as an
investment adviser or broker-dealer, censures and
fines.
AB, AB Holding, the General Partner and six of our subsidiaries
(Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., LLC (“SCB
LLC”),
AB Broadly Syndicated Loan Manager LLC, AB Custom Alternative
Solutions LLC, AB Private Credit Investors LLC, AB CarVal Investors
and W.P. Stewart Asset Management Ltd.) are registered with the SEC
as investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act.
Additionally, AB Holding is an NYSE-listed company and,
accordingly, is subject to applicable regulations promulgated by
the NYSE. Also, AB, SCB LLC and AB Custom Alternative Solutions LLC
are registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(“CFTC”)
as commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisers; SCB LLC
also is registered with the CFTC as a commodities introducing
broker.
Each U.S. Fund is registered with the SEC under the Investment
Company Act and each Non-U.S. Fund is subject to the laws in the
jurisdiction in which the fund is registered. For example, our
platform of Luxembourg-based funds operates pursuant to Luxembourg
laws and regulations, including Undertakings for the Collective
Investment in Transferable Securities Directives, and is authorized
and supervised by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur
Financier (“CSSF”),
the primary regulator in Luxembourg. AllianceBernstein Investor
Services, Inc., one of our subsidiaries, is registered with the SEC
as a transfer and servicing agent.
SCB LLC and another of our subsidiaries, AllianceBernstein
Investments, Inc., are registered with the SEC as broker-dealers,
and both are members of the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority. In addition, SCB LLC is a member of the NYSE and other
principal U.S. exchanges.
Many of our subsidiaries are subject to the oversight of regulatory
authorities in the jurisdictions outside the United States in which
they operate, including the Ontario Securities Commission, the
Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada, the European
Securities and Markets Authority, the Financial Conduct Authority
in the U.K., the CSSF in Luxembourg, the Financial Services Agency
in Japan, the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong, the
Monetary Authority of Singapore, the Financial Services Commission
in South Korea, the Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan and
The Securities and Exchange Board of India. While these regulatory
requirements often may be comparable to the requirements of the SEC
and other U.S. regulators, they are sometimes more restrictive and
may cause us to incur substantial expenditures of time and money
related to our compliance efforts. For additional information
relating to the regulations that impact our business,
please refer to "Risk Factors" in Item 1A.
History and Structure
We have been in the investment research and management business for
more than 50 years. Bernstein was founded in 1967. Alliance Capital
was founded in 1971 when the investment management department of
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc. (since November 2000, a part
of Credit Suisse Group) merged with the investment advisory
business of Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
In April 1988, AB Holding “went public” as a master limited
partnership. AB Holding Units, which trade under the ticker symbol
“AB,” have been listed on the NYSE since that time.
In October 1999, AB Holding reorganized by transferring its
business and assets to AB, a newly-formed operating partnership, in
exchange for all of the AB Units (the “Reorganization”).
Since the date of the Reorganization, AB has conducted the business
formerly conducted by AB Holding and AB Holding’s activities have
consisted of owning AB Units and engaging in related activities.
Unlike AB Holding Units, AB Units do not trade publicly and are
subject to significant restrictions on transfer. The General
Partner is the general partner of both AB and AB
Holding.
In October 2000, our two legacy firms, Alliance Capital and
Bernstein, combined, bringing together Alliance Capital’s expertise
in growth equity and corporate fixed income investing and its
family of retail mutual funds, with Bernstein’s expertise in value
equity investing, tax-exempt fixed income management, and its
Private Wealth Management and Bernstein Research Services
businesses.
As of December 31, 2022, the condensed ownership structure of
AB is as follows (for a more complete description of our ownership
structure,
see “Principal Security Holders” in Item 12):
The General Partner owns 100,000 general partnership units in AB
Holding and a 1% general partnership interest in AB. Including
these general partnership interests, EQH, directly and through
certain of its subsidiaries (see
“Principal Security Holders” in Item 12),
had an approximate 61.3% economic interest in AB as of
December 31, 2022.
Competition
We compete in all aspects of our business with numerous investment
management firms, mutual fund sponsors, brokerage and investment
banking firms, insurance companies, banks, savings and loan
associations, and other financial institutions that often provide
investment products with similar features and objectives as those
we offer. Our competitors offer a wide range of financial services
to the same customers that we seek to serve. Some of our
competitors are larger, have a broader range of product choices and
investment capabilities, conduct business in more markets, and have
substantially greater resources than we do. These factors may place
us at a competitive disadvantage, and we can give no assurance that
our strategies and efforts to maintain and enhance our current
client relationships, and create new ones, will be
successful.
In addition, EQH and its subsidiaries provide financial services,
some of which compete with those we offer. The AB Partnership
Agreement specifically allows EQH and its subsidiaries (other than
the General Partner) to compete with AB and to pursue opportunities
that may be available to us. EQH and certain of its subsidiaries
have substantially greater financial resources than we do and are
not obligated to provide resources to us.
To grow our business, we believe we must be able to compete
effectively for AUM. Key competitive factors include:
•our
investment performance for clients;
•our
commitment to place the interests of our clients
first;
•the
quality of our research;
•our
ability to attract, motivate and retain highly skilled, and often
highly specialized, personnel;
•the
array of investment products we offer;
•the
fees we charge;
•Morningstar/Lipper
rankings for the AB Funds;
•our
ability to sell our actively-managed investment services despite
the fact that many investors favor passive services;
•our
operational effectiveness;
•our
ability to further develop and market our brand; and
•our
global presence.
Competition is an important risk that our business faces and should
be considered along with the other factors we discuss
in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A.
Available Information
AB and AB Holding file or furnish annual reports on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K,
amendments to such reports, and other reports (and amendments
thereto) required to comply with federal securities laws, including
Section 16 beneficial ownership reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5,
registration statements and proxy statements. We maintain an
Internet site (http://www.alliancebernstein.com)
where the public can view these reports, free of charge, as soon as
reasonably practicable after each report is filed with, or
furnished to, the SEC. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet
site (http://www.sec.gov)
that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other
information regarding issuers that file electronically with the
SEC.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Please consider this section along with the description of our
business
in Item 1,
the competition section
immediately above
and AB’s financial information
contained in Items 7 and 8.
The majority of the risk factors discussed below directly affect
AB. These risk factors also affect AB Holding because AB Holding’s
principal source of income and cash flow is attributable to its
investment in AB.
See also “Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in Item
7.
Business-related Risks
Our revenues and results of operations depend on the market value
and composition of our AUM, which can fluctuate significantly based
on various factors, including many factors outside of our
control.
We derive most of our revenues from investment advisory and
services fees, which typically are calculated as a percentage of
the value of AUM as of a specified date, or as a percentage of the
value of average AUM for the applicable billing period, and vary
with the type of investment service, the size of the account and
the total amount of assets we manage for a particular client. The
value and composition of our AUM can be adversely affected by
several factors, including:
•Market
Factors.
Our AUM remain sensitive to the volatility associated with global
financial market conditions. For example, the dramatic securities
market declines experienced during March 2020, which resulted from
the global effects of COVID-19, caused a significant reduction in
our AUM. Markets and AUM levels recovered to new highs in 2021
following unprecedented, coordinated monetary and fiscal policy
support and the approval of vaccines to help remedy the global
pandemic. However, significant supply chain challenges, energy
shortages and labor shortages, brought about by COVID-19 and
significantly exacerbated by the conflict in Ukraine, contributed
to heightened global inflationary pressures, which resulted in
sizable interest rate increases and associated market volatility in
2022. We recognize that, due to continued uncertainty associated
with these circumstances, markets may remain volatile and,
accordingly, there remains risk of a significant reduction in our
revenues and net income in future periods. Global economies and
financial markets are increasingly interconnected, which increases
the probability that conditions in one country or region might
adversely impact a different country or region. Conditions
affecting the general economy, including political, social or
economic instability at the local, regional or global level may
also affect the market value of our AUM. Health crises, such as the
COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other incidents that interrupt the
expected course of events, such as natural disasters, war (such as
the ongoing conflict in Ukraine) or civil disturbance, acts of
terrorism (whether foreign or domestic), power outages and other
unforeseeable and external events, and the public response to or
fear of such diseases or events, have had and may in the future
have a significant adverse effect on financial markets and our AUM,
revenues and net income. Furthermore, the preventative and
protective health-related actions, such as business activity
suspensions and population lock-downs, that governments have taken,
and may continue to take, in response to COVID-19 have resulted,
and may continue to result, in periods of business interruption,
inability to obtain raw materials, supplies and component parts,
and reduced or disrupted operations. Also, significant market
volatility and uncertainty, and reductions in the availability of
margin financing, can significantly limit the liquidity of certain
asset backed and other securities, making it at times impossible to
sell these securities at prices reflecting their true economic
value. While liquidity conditions were relatively stable in 2022
despite market volatility, we recognize the possibility that
conditions could deteriorate in the future. Lack of liquidity makes
it more difficult for our funds to meet redemption requests. If
liquidity were to worsen, this may have a significant adverse
effect on our AUM, revenues and net income in the
future.
•Client
Preferences.
Generally, our clients may withdraw their assets at any time and on
short notice. Also, changing market dynamics and investment trends,
particularly with respect to sponsors of defined benefit plans
choosing to invest in less risky investments and the ongoing shift
to lower-fee passive services
described below,
may continue to reduce interest in some of the investment products
we offer, and/or clients and prospects may continue to seek
investment products that we may not currently offer. Loss of, or
decreases in, AUM reduces our investment advisory and services fees
and revenues.
•Our
Investment Performance.
Our ability to achieve investment returns for clients that meet or
exceed investment returns for comparable asset classes and
competing investment services is a key consideration when clients
decide to keep their assets with us or invest additional assets,
and when a prospective client is deciding whether to invest with
us. Poor investment performance, both in absolute terms and/or
relative to peers and stated benchmarks, may result in clients
withdrawing assets and prospective clients choosing to invest with
competitors.
•Investing
Trends.
Our fee rates can vary significantly among the various investment
products and services we offer to our clients (see
“Net Revenues” in Item 7
for additional information regarding our fee rates); our fee
realization rate fluctuates as clients shift assets between
accounts or products with different fee structures.
•Service
Changes.
We may be required to reduce our fee levels, restructure the fees
we charge and/or adjust the services we offer to our clients
because of, among other things, regulatory initiatives (whether
industry-wide or specifically targeted), changing technology in the
asset management business (including algorithmic strategies and
emerging financial technology), court decisions and competitive
considerations. A reduction in fee levels would reduce our
revenues.
•Interest
Rate Changes.
Investor interest in and the valuation of our fixed income and
multi-asset investment portfolios can be adversely affected by
changes in interest rates, particularly if interest rates increase
substantially and quickly.
A decrease in the value of our AUM, a decrease in the amount of AUM
we manage, an adverse mix shift in our AUM and/or a reduction in
the level of fees we charge would adversely affect our investment
advisory fees and revenues. A reduction in revenues, without a
commensurate reduction in expenses, adversely affects our results
of operations.
The industry-wide shift from actively managed investment services
to passive services has adversely affected our investment advisory
and services fees, revenues and results of operations, and this
trend may continue.
Our competitive environment has become increasingly difficult, as
active managers, which invest based on individual security
selection, have, on average, consistently underperformed passive
services, which invest based on market indices. Active performance
relative to benchmarks as of mid-2022 deteriorated from prior-year
levels, with 40% of active managers outperforming their passive
benchmarks for the 12 months ended June 30, 2022 (latest data
available), compared to 47% for the prior 12-month period. U.S.
stock active funds fared better than non-U.S. with 45% of U.S.
active stock funds outperforming benchmarks, as compared with 23%
for non-U.S. stock funds. Performance of actively managed bond
funds decreased sharply in 2022, with just 29% outperforming
benchmarks, representing a 44% decline compared to the prior-year
period.
Flows into actively managed funds deteriorated industry-wide in
2022, with U.S. industry-wide active mutual fund outflows of $974
billion in 2022, contrasted with inflows of $148 billion in 2021.
Active fixed income U.S. mutual funds experienced outflows of $482
billion in 2022, compared to inflows of $368 billion in 2021.
Furthermore, active equity U.S. mutual fund outflows accelerated to
$432 billion in 2022, compared to outflows of $191 billion in 2021.
By contrast, demand for passive strategies in the U.S. continued to
grow, though at a reduced rate from the prior year, as
industry-wide total passive mutual fund net inflows of $518 billion
in 2022 compared to $928 billion in 2021. Organic growth through
net inflows continues to be difficult to achieve for active
managers, such as AB, and requires taking market share from other
active managers.
The significant shift from active services to passive services
adversely affects Bernstein Research Services revenues as well.
Institutional global market trading volumes continue to be
pressured (notwithstanding the heightened market volatility and
trading volume predominantly relating to COVID-19 in the first half
of 2020) by persistent active equity outflows and passive equity
inflows. As a result, portfolio turnover has declined and investors
hold fewer shares that are actively traded by
managers.
Our reputation could suffer if we are unable to deliver consistent,
competitive investment performance.
Our business is based on the trust and confidence of our clients.
Damage to our reputation, resulting from poor or inconsistent
investment performance, among other factors, can reduce
substantially our AUM and impair our ability to maintain or grow
our business.
EQH and its subsidiaries provide a significant amount of our AUM
and fund a significant portion of our seed investments, and if our
agreements with them terminate or they withdraw capital support it
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and/or financial condition.
EQH (our parent company) and its subsidiaries constitute our
largest client. Our EQH affiliates represented approximately 16% of
our AUM as of December 31, 2022, and we earned approximately
4% of our net revenues from services we provided to them. Our
related investment management agreements are terminable at any time
or on short notice by either party, and EQH is not under any
obligation to maintain any level of AUM with us. A material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and/or financial
condition could result if EQH were to terminate its investment
management agreements with us.
Our business is dependent on investment advisory agreements with
clients, and selling and distribution agreements with various
financial intermediaries and consultants, which generally are
subject to termination or non-renewal on short notice.
We derive most of our revenues pursuant to written investment
management agreements (or other arrangements) with institutional
investors, mutual funds and private wealth clients, and
selling and distribution agreements with financial intermediaries
that distribute AB Funds. Generally, the investment management
agreements (and other arrangements), including our agreements with
EQH and its subsidiaries, are terminable at any time or upon
relatively short notice by either party. The investment management
agreements pursuant to which we manage the U.S. Funds must be
renewed and approved by the Funds’ boards of directors annually. A
significant majority of the directors are independent.
Consequently, there can be no assurance that the board of directors
of each fund will approve the fund’s investment management
agreement each year, or will not condition its approval on revised
terms that may be adverse to us. In addition, investors in AB Funds
can redeem their investments without notice. Any termination of, or
failure to renew, a significant number of these agreements, or a
significant increase in redemption rates, could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and business
prospects.
Similarly, the selling and distribution agreements with securities
firms, brokers, banks and other financial intermediaries are
terminable by either party upon notice (generally 30 days) and do
not obligate the financial intermediary to sell any specific amount
of fund shares. These intermediaries generally offer their clients
investment products that compete with our products. In addition,
certain institutional investors rely on consultants to advise them
about choosing an investment adviser and some of our services may
not be considered among the best choices by these consultants. As a
result, investment consultants may advise their clients to move
their assets invested with us to other investment advisers, which
could result in significant net outflows.
Lastly, our Private Wealth Services rely on referrals from
financial planners, registered investment advisers and other
professionals. We cannot be certain that we will continue to have
access to, or receive referrals from, these third parties. Loss of
such access or referrals could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations and business prospects.
Performance-based fee arrangements with our clients may cause
greater fluctuations in our net revenues.
We sometimes charge our clients performance-based fees, whereby we
charge a base advisory fee and are eligible to earn an additional
performance-based fee or incentive allocation that is calculated as
either a percentage of absolute investment results or a percentage
of investment results in excess of a stated benchmark over a
specified period of time. Some performance-based fees include a
high-watermark provision, which generally provides that if a client
account under-performs relative to its performance target (whether
in absolute terms or relative to a specified benchmark), it must
gain back such under-performance before we can collect future
performance-based fees. Therefore, if we fail to achieve the
performance target for a particular period, we will not earn a
performance-based fee for that period and, for accounts with a
high-watermark provision, our ability to earn future
performance-based fees will be impaired.
We are eligible to earn performance-based fees on 10.6%, 9.2% and
0.5% of the assets we manage for institutional clients, private
wealth clients and retail clients, respectively (in total, 6.6% of
our AUM). If the percentage of our AUM subject to performance-based
fees increases, seasonality and volatility of revenue and earnings
are likely to become more significant. Our performance-based fees
were $145.2 million, $245.1 million and $132.6 million in 2022,
2021 and 2020, respectively.
The revenues generated by Bernstein Research Services may be
adversely affected by circumstances beyond our control, including
declines in brokerage transaction rates, declines in global market
volumes, failure to settle our trades by significant counterparties
and the effects of Brexit.
Electronic, or “low-touch,” trading represents a significant
percentage of buy-side trading activity and typically produces
transaction fees that are significantly lower than traditional
full-service fee rates. As a result, blended pricing throughout our
industry is lower now than it was historically, and price declines
may continue. In addition, fee rates we charge and charged by other
brokers for brokerage services have historically experienced price
pressure, and we expect these trends to continue. Also, while
increases in transaction volume and market share often can offset
decreases in rates, this may not continue.
In addition, the failure or inability of any of our broker-dealer's
significant counterparties to perform could expose us to
substantial expenditures and adversely affect our revenues. For
example, SCB LLC, as a member of clearing and settlement
organizations, would be required to settle open trades of any
non-performing counterparty. This exposes us to the mark-to-market
adjustment on the trades between trade date and settlement date,
which could be significant, especially during periods of severe
market volatility. Also, our ability to access liquidity in such
situations may be limited by what our funding relationships are
able to offer us at such times.
Lastly, extensive changes proposed by the SEC to the equity market
structure, including Regulation Best Execution, the proposed Order
Competition Rule and proposed changes to Regulation NMA
establishing, among other things, minimum pricing increments and
required disclosures by larger broker-dealers and specified trading
platforms, if adopted as proposed, could substantially increase the
cost of conducting our buy-side and broker-dealer operations and,
possibly, adversely impact trade execution quality.
We discuss the risks associated with Brexit
below in "Legal and Regulatory-related Risks" in this Item
1A.
We may be unable to develop new products and services, and the
development of new products and services may expose us to
reputational harm, additional costs or operational
risk.
Our financial performance depends, in part, on our ability to react
nimbly to changes in the asset management industry, respond to
evolving client needs, and develop, market and manage new
investment products and services. Conversely, the development and
introduction of new products and services, including the creation
of products with concentrations in industries or sectors specific
to individual client criteria, or with a focus on ESG, requires
continuous innovative effort on our part and may require
significant time and resources as well as ongoing support and
investment. Substantial risk and uncertainties are associated with
the introduction of new products and services, including the
implementation of new and appropriate operational controls and
procedures, shifting client and market preferences, the
introduction of competing products or services, and compliance with
regulatory and disclosure requirements. We can make no assurance
that we will be able to develop new products and services that
successfully address the needs of clients within needed timeframes.
Any failure to successfully develop new products and services, or
effectively manage associated operational risks, could harm our
reputation and expose us to additional costs, which could adversely
affect our AUM, revenues and operating income.
Fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and
various other currencies can adversely affect our AUM, revenues and
results of operations.
Although significant portions of our net revenues and expenses, as
well as our AUM, presently are denominated in U.S. dollars, we have
subsidiaries and clients outside of the United States with
functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Weakening of
these currencies relative to the U.S. dollar adversely affects the
value in U.S. dollar terms of our revenues and our AUM denominated
in these other currencies. Accordingly, fluctuations in U.S. dollar
exchange rates affect our AUM, revenues and reported financial
results from one period to the next.
We may not be successful in our efforts to hedge our exposure to
such fluctuations, which could negatively impact our revenues and
reported financial results.
Our seed capital investments are subject to market risk. While we
enter into various futures, forwards, swap and option contracts to
economically hedge many of these investments, we also may be
exposed to market risk and credit-related losses in the event of
non-performance by counterparties to these derivative
instruments.
We have a seed investment program for the purpose of building track
records and assisting with the marketing initiatives pertaining to
our firm's new products. These seed capital investments are subject
to market risk. Our risk management team oversees a seed hedging
program that attempts to minimize this risk, subject to practical
and cost considerations. Also, not all seed investments are deemed
appropriate to hedge, and in those cases we are exposed to market
risk. In addition, we may be subject to basis risk in that we
cannot always hedge with precision our market exposure and, as a
result, we may be subject to relative spreads between market
sectors. As a result, volatility in the capital markets may cause
significant changes in our period-to-period financial and operating
results.
We use various derivative instruments, including futures, forwards,
swaps and option contracts, in conjunction with our seed hedging
program. While in most cases broad market risks are hedged, our
hedges are imperfect and some market risk remains. In addition, our
use of derivatives results in counterparty risk
(i.e.,
the risk that we may be exposed to credit-related losses in the
event of non-performance by counterparties to these derivative
instruments), regulatory risk (e.g.,
short selling restrictions) and cash/synthetic basis risk
(i.e.,
the risk that the underlying positions do not move identically to
the related derivative instruments).
We may engage in strategic transactions that could pose
risks.
As part of our business strategy, we consider potential strategic
transactions, including acquisitions (such as our purchase of
CarVal Investors in 2022), dispositions, mergers, consolidations,
joint venture partnerships (such as our planned joint venture
partnership with SocGen) and similar transactions, some of which
may be material. These transactions, if undertaken, may involve
various risks and present financial, managerial and operational
challenges, including:.
•adverse
effects on our earnings if acquired intangible assets or goodwill
become impaired;
•existence
of unknown liabilities or contingencies that arise after
closing;
•potential
disputes with counterparties; and
•the
possible need for us to increase our firm's leverage or, if we fund
the purchase price of a transaction with AB Units or AB Holding
Units, likely dilution to our existing unitholders.
Acquisitions also pose the risk that any business we acquire may
lose customers or employees or could under-perform relative to
expectations. Additionally, the loss of investment personnel poses
the risk that we may lose the AUM we expected to manage, which
could adversely affect our results of operations.
We may not accurately value the securities we hold on behalf of our
clients or our company investments.
In accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, contractual
obligations or client direction, we employ procedures for the
pricing and valuation of securities and other positions held in
client accounts or for company investments. We have established a
Valuation Committee, consisting of senior officers and employees,
which oversees pricing controls and valuation processes. If market
quotations for a security are not readily available, the Valuation
Committee determines a fair value for the security.
Extraordinary volatility in financial markets, significant
liquidity constraints or our failure to adequately consider one or
more factors when determining the fair value of a security based on
information with limited market observability could result in our
failing to properly value securities we hold for our clients or
investments accounted for on our balance sheet. Improper valuation
likely would result in our basing fee calculations on inaccurate
AUM figures, our striking incorrect net asset values for
company-sponsored mutual funds or hedge funds or, in the case of
company investments, our inaccurately calculating and
reporting
our financial condition and operating results. Although the overall
percentage of our AUM that we fair value based on information with
limited market observability is not significant, inaccurate fair
value determinations can harm our clients, create regulatory issues
and damage our reputation.
The quantitative and systematic models we use in certain of our
investment services may contain errors, resulting in imprecise risk
assessments and unintended output.
We use quantitative and systematic models in a variety of our
investment services, generally in combination with fundamental
research. These models are developed by senior quantitative
professionals and typically are implemented by IT professionals.
Our Model Risk Oversight Committee oversees the model governance
framework and associated model review activities, which are then
executed by our Model Risk Team. However, due to the complexity and
large data dependency of such models, it is possible that errors in
the models could exist and our controls could fail to detect such
errors. Failure to detect errors could result in client losses and
reputational damage.
The financial services industry is intensely
competitive.
We compete on the basis of a number of factors, including our
investment performance for our clients, our array of investment
services, innovation, reputation and price. By having a global
presence, we often face competitors with more experience and more
established relationships with clients, regulators and industry
participants in the relevant market, which could adversely affect
our ability to expand. Furthermore, if we are unable to maintain
and/or continue to improve our investment performance, our client
flows may be adversely affected, which may make it more difficult
for us to compete effectively.
Also, increased competition could reduce the demand for our
products and services, which could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition, results of operations and business
prospects. For additional information regarding competitive
factors,
see “Competition” in Item 1.
People-related Risks
We may be unable to continue to attract, motivate and retain key
personnel, and the cost to retain key personnel could put pressure
on our adjusted operating margin.
Our business depends on our ability to attract, motivate and retain
highly skilled, and often highly specialized, technical,
investment, managerial and executive personnel, and there is no
assurance that we will be able to continue to do so.
The market for these professionals is extremely competitive.
Certain of these professionals often maintain strong, personal
relationships with investors in our products and other members of
the business community so their departure may cause us to lose
client accounts or result in fewer opportunities to win new
business, either of which factors could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations and business
prospects.
Additionally, a decline in revenues may limit our ability to pay
our employees at competitive levels, and maintaining (or
increasing) compensation without a revenue increase, in order to
retain key personnel, may adversely affect our operating margin.
For additional information regarding our compensation
practices,
see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" in
Item 11.
Our process of relocating our headquarters may not be executed as
we have envisioned.
We have established our corporate headquarters in and have
relocated a total of approximately 1,250 jobs previously located in
the New York metropolitan area to Nashville, Tennessee (for
additional information,
see “Relocation Strategy” in Item 7).
Although the eventual impact on AB from this process is not yet
known, the uncertainty created by these circumstances could
adversely affect AB’s ability to motivate and retain current
employees. Further, significant managerial and operational
challenges could arise if the firm encounters more difficulty than
expected in hiring qualified employees to help staff our Nashville
headquarters.
Additionally, our estimates for both the transition costs and the
corresponding expense savings relating to our headquarters
relocation are based on our current assumptions of employee
relocation costs, severance, and overlapping compensation and
occupancy costs. If our assumptions turn out to be inaccurate, our
expenses and operating income could be
adversely affected.
Employee misconduct, which can be difficult to detect and deter,
could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain
clients and subjecting us to significant regulatory scrutiny, legal
liability and reputational harm.
There have been several highly publicized cases involving fraud or
other misconduct by employees in the financial services industry
generally, and we are not immune. Misconduct by employees could
involve the improper use or disclosure of confidential information,
which could result in legal action, regulatory sanctions, and
reputational or financial harm. Further,
fraud, payment or solicitation of bribes and other deceptive
practices or other misconduct by our employees could similarly
subject us to regulatory scrutiny, legal liability and reputational
damage.
Operational, Technology and Cyber-related Risks
Technology failures and disruptions, including failures to properly
safeguard confidential information, can significantly constrain our
operations and result in significant time and expense to remediate,
which could result in a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and business prospects.
We are highly dependent on software and related technologies
throughout our business, including both proprietary systems and
those provided by third-party vendors. We use our technology to,
among other things, obtain securities pricing information, process
client transactions, store and maintain data, and provide reports
and other services to our clients. Despite our protective measures,
including measures designed to effectively secure information
through system security technology and established and tested
business continuity plans, we may still experience system delays
and interruptions as a result of natural disasters, hardware
failures, software defects, power outages, acts of war and
third-party failures. We cannot predict with certainty all of the
adverse effects that could result from our failure, or the failure
of a third party, to efficiently address and resolve these delays
and interruptions. These adverse effects could include the
inability to perform critical business functions or failure to
comply with financial reporting and other regulatory requirements,
which could lead to loss of client confidence, reputational damage,
exposure to disciplinary action and liability to our
clients.
Many of the software applications that we use in our business are
licensed from, and supported, upgraded and maintained by,
third-party vendors. A suspension or termination of certain of
these licenses or the related support, upgrades and maintenance
could cause temporary system delays or interruption. Additionally,
technology rapidly evolves and we cannot guarantee that our
competitors may not implement more advanced technology platforms
for their products and services, which may place us at a
competitive disadvantage and adversely affect our results of
operations and business prospects.
Also, we could be subject to losses if we fail to properly
safeguard sensitive and confidential information. As part of our
normal operations, we maintain and transmit confidential
information about our clients as well as proprietary information
relating to our business operations. Although we take protective
measures, our systems still could be vulnerable to cyber attack or
other forms of unauthorized access (including computer viruses)
that have a security impact, such as an authorized employee or
vendor inadvertently or intentionally causing us to release
confidential or proprietary information. Such disclosure could,
among other things, allow competitors access to our proprietary
business information and require significant time and expense to
investigate and remediate the breach. Moreover, loss of
confidential client information could harm our reputation and
subject us to liability under laws that protect confidential
personal data, resulting in increased costs or loss of
revenues.
Any significant security breach of our information and cyber
security infrastructure, as well as our failure to properly
escalate and respond to such an incident, may significantly harm
our operations and reputation.
It is critical that we ensure the continuity and effectiveness of
our information and cyber security infrastructure, policies,
procedures and capabilities to protect our computer and
telecommunications systems and the data that reside on or are
transmitted through them and contracted third-party systems.
Although we take protective measures, including measures to
effectively secure information through system security technology,
our technology systems may still be vulnerable to unauthorized
access, supply chain attacks, computer viruses or other events that
have a security impact, such as an external attack by one or more
cyber criminals (including phishing attacks attempting to obtain
confidential information and ransomware attacks attempting to block
access to a computer system until a sum of money is paid), which
could materially harm our operations and reputation. Additionally,
while we take precautions to password protect and encrypt our
laptops and sensitive information on our other mobile electronic
devices, if such devices are stolen, misplaced or left unattended,
they may become vulnerable to hacking or other unauthorized use,
creating a possible security risk and resulting in potentially
costly actions by
us.
Furthermore, although we maintain a robust cyber security
infrastructure and incident preparedness strategy, which we test
frequently, we may be unable to respond, both internally and
externally, to a cyber incident in a sufficiently expeditious
manner. Any such failure could cause significant harm to our
reputation and result in litigation, regulatory scrutiny and/or
significant remediation costs.
Climate change and other unpredictable events, including outbreak
of infectious disease, natural disaster, dangerous weather
conditions, technology failure, terrorist attack and political
unrest, may adversely affect our ability to conduct
business.
War, terrorist attack, political unrest, power failure, climate
change, natural disaster and rapid spread of infectious disease
(such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic) could interrupt our
operations by:
•causing
disruptions in global economic conditions, thereby decreasing
investor confidence and making investment products generally less
attractive;
•inflicting
loss of life;
•triggering
large-scale technology failures or delays;
•breaching
our information and cyber security infrastructure; and
•requiring
substantial capital expenditures and operating expenses to
remediate damage and restore operations.
Furthermore, climate change may increase the severity and frequency
of catastrophes, or adversely affect our investment portfolio or
investor sentiment. Climate change may also increase the frequency
and severity of weather-related disasters and pandemics. And,
climate change regulation may affect the prospects of companies and
other entities whose securities in which we invest, or our
willingness to continue to invest in such securities.
Despite the contingency plans and facilities we have in place,
including system security measures, information back-up and
disaster recovery processes, our ability to conduct business,
including in key business centers where we have significant
operations, such as Nashville, Tennessee, New York City, London,
England, and Hong Kong, may be adversely affected by a disruption
in the infrastructure that supports our operations and the
communities in which they are located. This may include a
disruption involving electrical, communications, transportation or
other services we may use or third parties with which we conduct
business. If a disruption occurs in one location and our employees
in that location are unable to occupy our offices or communicate
with or travel to other locations, our ability to conduct business
with and on behalf of our clients may suffer, and we may not be
able to successfully implement contingency plans that depend on
communication or travel. Furthermore, unauthorized access to our
systems as a result of a security breach, the failure of our
systems, or the loss of data could give rise to legal proceedings
or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of
personal information, disrupt operations, and damage our
reputation.
Our operations require experienced, professional staff. Loss of a
substantial number of such persons or an inability to provide
properly equipped places for them to work may, by disrupting our
operations, adversely affect our financial condition, results of
operations and business prospects. In addition, our property and
business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate
us for all losses, failures or breaches that may
occur.
Our own operational failures or those of third parties on which we
rely, including failures arising out of human error, could disrupt
our business, damage our reputation and reduce our
revenues.
Weaknesses or failures in our internal processes or systems could
lead to disruption of our operations, liability to clients,
exposure to disciplinary action or harm to our reputation. Our
business is highly dependent on our ability to process, on a daily
basis, large numbers of transactions, many of which are highly
complex, across numerous and diverse markets. These transactions
generally must comply with client investment guidelines, as well as
stringent legal and regulatory standards.
Our obligations to clients require us to exercise skill, care and
prudence in performing our services. Despite our employees being
highly trained and skilled, the large number of transactions we
process makes it highly likely that errors will occasionally occur.
If we make a mistake in performing our services that causes
financial harm to a client, we have a duty to act promptly to put
the client in the position the client would have been in had we not
made the error. The occurrence of mistakes, particularly
significant ones, can have a material adverse effect on our
reputation, results of operations and business
prospects.
The individuals and third-party vendors on whom we rely to perform
services for us or our clients may be unable or unwilling to honor
their contractual obligations to us.
We rely on various counterparties and other third-party vendors to
augment our existing investment, operational, financial and
technological capabilities, but the use of a third-party vendor
does not diminish AB's responsibility to ensure that client and
regulatory obligations are met. Default rates, credit downgrades
and disputes with counterparties as to the valuation of collateral
increase significantly in times of market stress. Disruptions in
the financial markets and other economic challenges may cause our
counterparties and other third-party vendors to experience
significant cash flow problems or even render them insolvent, which
may expose us to significant costs and impair our ability to
conduct business.
Weaknesses or failures within a third-party vendor's internal
processes or systems, or inadequate business continuity plans, can
materially disrupt our business operations. Also, third-party
vendors may lack the necessary infrastructure or resources to
effectively safeguard our confidential data. If we are unable to
effectively manage the risks associated with such third-party
relationships, we may suffer fines, disciplinary action and
reputational damage.
We may not always successfully manage actual and potential
conflicts of interest that arise in our business.
Increasingly, we must manage actual and potential conflicts of
interest, including situations where our services to a particular
client conflict, or are perceived to conflict, with the interests
of another client. Failure to adequately address potential
conflicts of interest could adversely affect our reputation,
results of operations and business prospects.
We have procedures and controls that are designed to identify and
mitigate conflicts of interest, including those designed to prevent
the improper sharing of information. However, appropriately
managing conflicts of interest is complex. Our reputation could be
damaged and the willingness of clients to enter into transactions
in which such a conflict might arise may be affected if we fail, or
appear to fail, to deal appropriately with actual or perceived
conflicts of interest. In addition, potential or perceived
conflicts could give rise to litigation or regulatory enforcement
actions.
Maintaining adequate liquidity for our general business needs
depends on certain factors, including operating cash flows and our
access to credit on reasonable terms.
Our financial condition is dependent on our cash flow from
operations, which is subject to the performance of the capital
markets, our ability to maintain and grow AUM and other factors
beyond our control. Our ability to issue public or private debt on
reasonable terms may be limited by adverse market conditions, our
profitability, our creditworthiness as perceived by lenders and
changes in government regulations, including tax rates and interest
rates. Furthermore, our access to credit on reasonable terms is
partially dependent on our firm’s credit ratings.
Both Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor's
Rating Service affirmed AB’s long-term and short-term credit
ratings and indicated a stable outlook in 2022. Future changes in
our credit ratings are possible and any downgrade to our ratings is
likely to increase our borrowing costs and limit our access to the
capital markets. If this occurs, we may be forced to incur
unanticipated costs or revise our strategic plans, which could have
a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of
operations and business prospects.
An impairment of goodwill may occur.
Determining whether an impairment of the goodwill asset exists
requires management to exercise a substantial amount of judgment.
In addition, to the extent that securities valuations are depressed
for prolonged periods of time and/or market conditions deteriorate,
or if we experience significant net redemptions, our AUM, revenues,
profitability and unit price will be adversely affected. Although
the price of an AB Holding Unit is just one factor in the
calculation of fair value, if AB Holding Unit price levels decline
significantly, reaching the conclusion that fair value exceeds
carrying value will, over time, become more difficult. In addition,
control premiums, industry earnings multiples and discount rates
are impacted by economic conditions. As a result, subsequent
impairment tests may occur more frequently and be based on more
negative assumptions and future cash flow projections, and may
result in an impairment of goodwill. An impairment may result in a
material charge to our earnings. For additional information about
our impairment testing,
see Item 7.
The insurance that we purchase may not fully cover all potential
exposures.
We maintain professional liability, errors & omissions,
fidelity, cyber, property, casualty, business interruption and
other types of insurance, but such insurance may not cover all
risks associated with the operation of our business. Our coverage
is subject to exclusions and limitations, including high
self-insured retentions or deductibles and maximum limits and
liabilities covered. In addition, from time to time, various types
of insurance may not be available on commercially acceptable terms
or, in some cases, at all. We can make no assurance that a claim or
claims will be covered by our insurance policies or, if covered,
will not exceed our available insurance coverage, or that our
insurers will remain solvent and meet their
obligations.
In the future, we may not be able to obtain coverage at current
levels, if at all, and our premiums may increase significantly on
coverage that we maintain. Also, we currently are party to certain
joint insurance arrangements with subsidiaries of EQH. If our
affiliates choose not to include us as insured parties under any
such policies, we may need to obtain stand-alone insurance
coverage, which could have coverage terms that are less beneficial
to us and/or cost more.
Legal and Regulatory-related Risks
Our business is subject to pervasive, complex and continuously
evolving global regulation, compliance with which involves
substantial expenditures of time and money, and violation of which
may result in material adverse consequences.
Virtually all aspects of our business are subject to federal and
state laws and regulations, rules of securities regulators and
exchanges, and laws and regulations in the foreign jurisdictions in
which our subsidiaries conduct business. If we violate these laws
or regulations, we could be subject to civil liability, criminal
liability or sanction, including restriction or revocation of our
and our subsidiaries’ professional licenses or registrations,
revocation of the licenses of our employees, censures, fines, or
temporary suspension or permanent bar from conducting business. Any
such liability or sanction could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition, results of operations and business
prospects. A regulatory proceeding, even if it does not result in a
finding of wrongdoing or sanction, could require substantial
expenditures of time and money and could potentially damage our
reputation.
In recent years, global regulators have substantially increased
their oversight of financial services. Some of the newly-adopted
and proposed regulations are focused on investment management
services. Others, while more broadly focused, nonetheless impact
our business. Moreover, the adoption of new laws, regulations or
standards and changes in the interpretation or enforcement of
existing laws, regulations or standards have directly affected, and
will continue to affect, our business, including making our efforts
to comply more expensive and time-consuming.
For example, there has been increasing regulatory focus on
ESG-related practices by investment managers. The SEC is poised in
2023 to issue a rule enhancing and standardizing climate
disclosures by U.S. public companies, including investment
managers. The SEC also has focused on the labeling by investment
funds of their activities or investments as "sustainable" and has
examined the methodology used by funds for determining ESG
investments, with a keen focus on whether such labeling may be
misleading. Outside the U.S., the European Commission has adopted
an action plan on financing sustainable growth, as well as
initiatives at the European Union (the "EU")
level, such as the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation
(the "SFDR").
Compliance with the SFDR and other ESG-related regulations may
subject us to increased restrictions, disclosure obligations, and
compliance and other associated costs, as well as potential
reputational harm.
Also, in 2015 the Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan (the
“FSC”)
implemented new limits on the degree to which local investors can
own an offshore investment product. While certain exemptions have
been available to us, should we not continue to qualify, the FSC’s
rules could force some of our local resident investors to redeem
their investments in our funds sold in Taiwan (and/or prevent
further sales of those funds in Taiwan), some of which funds have
local ownership levels substantially above the FSC limits. This
could lead to significant declines in our investment advisory and
services fees and revenues earned from these funds.
Additionally, in July 2017 the Chief Executive of the U.K.
Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”),
which regulates the London Interbank Offered Rate, or “LIBOR,” as a
“benchmark” or “reference rate” for various interest rate
calculations, announced that the FCA will no longer persuade or
compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of the LIBOR
benchmark after 2021. In November 2020, the ICE Benchmark
Administration Limited announced a plan to extend the date as of
which most U.S. LIBOR values would cease being computed from
December 31, 2021 to June 30, 2023. Although financial regulators
and industry working groups have suggested alternative reference
rates, global consensus on alternative rates is lacking and the
process for amending existing contracts or instruments to
transition away from LIBOR remains unclear. The elimination of
LIBOR or changes to other reference rates or any other changes or
reforms to the determination or supervision of reference rates may
adversely affect the amount of interest payable or interest
receivable on certain of our firm's portfolio investments. These
changes may also impact the market liquidity and market value of
these portfolio investments. We are finalizing our global
assessment of exposure in relation to funds utilizing LIBOR based
instruments and benchmarks. Further, we are prioritizing the
mitigation of risks associated with the forecast changes to
financial instruments and performance benchmarks referencing
existing LIBOR rates, and concurrently any impact on AB portfolios
and investment strategies.
Lastly, it also is uncertain how regulatory trends will further
evolve, both in the U.S. and abroad. For example, following the
Brexit referendum in June 2016, the U.K.'s departure from the EU
resulted in the U.K. leaving the EU Single Market on December 31,
2020. While the U.K. and the EU have agreed to a trade deal, which
took effect on January 1, 2021, this deal does not
include specific arrangements for financial services. Accordingly,
since the start of 2021, our U.K.-based buy-side and sell-side
subsidiaries have implemented alternative arrangements in EU
jurisdictions (utilizing AB's EU-based subsidiaries) to ensure
continued operations in the EU Single Market. These arrangements
are subject to potential change due to ongoing negotiations between
the U.K. and the EU on future regulatory cooperation, and it is
difficult to ascertain how any such changes may impact the
ability of our U.K.-based subsidiaries to provide services to
EU-based clients in the future.
We are involved in various legal proceedings and regulatory matters
and may be involved in such proceedings in the future, any one or
combination of which could have a material adverse effect on our
reputation, financial condition, results of operations and business
prospects.
We may be involved in various matters, including regulatory
inquiries, administrative proceedings and litigation, some of which
allege significant damages, and we may be involved in additional
matters in the future. Litigation is subject to significant
uncertainties, particularly when plaintiffs allege substantial or
indeterminate damages, the litigation is in its early stages, or
when the litigation is highly complex or broad in
scope.
Structure-related Risks
The partnership structure of AB Holding and AB limits Unitholders’
abilities to influence the management and operation of AB’s
business and is highly likely to prevent a change in control of AB
Holding and AB.
The General Partner, as general partner of both AB Holding and AB,
generally has the exclusive right and full authority and
responsibility to manage, conduct, control and operate their
respective businesses, except as otherwise expressly stated in
their respective Amended and Restated Agreements of Limited
Partnership. AB Holding and AB Unitholders have more limited voting
rights on matters affecting AB than do holders of common stock in a
corporation. Both Amended and Restated Agreements of Limited
Partnership provide that Unitholders do not have any right to vote
for directors of the General Partner and that Unitholders only can
vote on certain extraordinary matters (including removal of the
General Partner under certain
extraordinary circumstances). Additionally, the AB Partnership
Agreement includes significant restrictions on the transfer of AB
Units and provisions that have the practical effect of preventing
the removal of the General Partner, which provisions are highly
likely to prevent a change in control of AB’s
management.
AB Units are illiquid and subject to significant transfer
restrictions.
There is no public trading market for AB Units and we do not
anticipate that a public trading market will develop. The AB
Partnership Agreement restricts our ability to participate in a
public trading market or anything substantially equivalent to one
by providing that any transfer that may cause AB to be classified
as a “publicly traded partnership” (“PTP”)
as defined in Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the “Code”),
shall be deemed void and shall not be recognized by AB. In
addition, AB Units are subject to significant restrictions on
transfer, such as obtaining the written consent of EQH and the
General Partner pursuant to the AB Partnership Agreement.
Generally, neither EQH nor the General Partner will permit any
transfer that it believes would create a risk that AB would be
treated as a corporation for tax purposes. EQH and the General
Partner have implemented a transfer program that requires a seller
to locate a purchaser and imposes annual volume restrictions on
transfers. You may request a copy of the transfer program from our
Corporate Secretary
(corporate_secretary@alliancebernstein.com).
Also, we have filed the transfer program as Exhibit 10.07 to this
Form 10-K.
Changes in the treatment of AB Holding and AB as partnerships for
tax purposes would have significant tax ramifications.
Having elected under Section 7704(g) of the Code to be subject to a
3.5% federal tax on partnership gross income from the active
conduct of a trade or business, AB Holding is a PTP that is taxable
as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. To preserve AB
Holding's status as a PTP that is taxed as a partnership for
federal income tax purposes, AB Holding must not directly or
indirectly (through AB) enter into a substantial new line of
business. A “new line of business” includes any business that is
not closely related to AB’s historical business of providing
research and diversified investment management and related services
to its clients. A new line of business is “substantial” when a
partnership derives more than 15% of its gross income from, or uses
more than 15% (by value) of its total assets in, the new line of
business.
To preserve AB’s status as a private partnership for federal income
tax purposes, AB Units must not be considered
publicly traded.
If either or both AB Holding and AB were taxable as a corporation,
the return on investment to Unitholders generally would be reduced
because distributions to Unitholders generally would be subject to
two layers of taxation: first, amounts available for distribution
would be subject to federal (and applicable state and local) taxes
at the corporate entity level; and second, Unitholders generally
would be subject to federal (and applicable state and local) taxes
upon receipt of dividends.
AB Holding and AB are subject to the 4.0% New York City
unincorporated business tax (“UBT”). AB Holding may net credits for
UBT paid by AB.
Changes in tax law governing us or an increase in business
activities outside the U.S. could have a material impact on
us.
Legislative proposals have been or may be introduced that, if
enacted, could have a material adverse effect on us. We cannot
predict the outcome of such legislative proposals.
Each of AB's non-U.S. corporate subsidiaries generally is subject
to taxes in the foreign jurisdiction where it is located. If our
business increasingly operates in countries other than the U.S., or
if there are changes in tax law or rates of taxation in foreign
jurisdictions where our corporate subsidiaries operate, AB's
effective tax rate could increase.
If any audit by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") of our income
tax returns for any of our taxable years beginning after December
31, 2017 results in any adjustments, the IRS may collect any
resulting taxes, including any applicable penalties and interest,
directly from us, in which case our net income and the cash
available for quarterly Unitholder distributions may be
substantially reduced.
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, a "partnership
representative" that we designate (a “Partnership
Representative”)
will have the sole authority to act on our behalf for purposes of,
among other things, IRS audits and related proceedings (and any
similar state or local audits and proceedings). Any actions taken
by us or by the Partnership Representative on our behalf in
connection with such audits or proceedings will be binding on us
and our Unitholders.
For an audit of a partnership's taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2017, the IRS, absent an election by the partnership
to the contrary (see
discussion below),
generally determines adjustments at the partnership level in the
year in which the audit is resolved.
Generally, we will have the ability to collect any resulting tax
liability (and any related interest and penalties) from our
Unitholders in accordance with their percentage interests during
the year under audit, but there can be no assurance that we will
elect to do so or be able to do so under all circumstances. If we
do not collect such tax liability from our Unitholders in
accordance with their percentage interests in the tax year under
audit, our net income and the available cash for quarterly
distributions to current Unitholders may be substantially reduced.
Accordingly, our current Unitholders may bear some or all of the
tax liability resulting from such audit adjustment, even if such
Unitholders did not own Units during the tax year under audit. In
particular, with respect to AB Holding, our Partnership
Representative may, in certain instances, request that any “imputed
under-payment” resulting from an audit be adjusted by amounts of
certain of our passive losses. If we successfully make such a
request, we would have to reduce suspended passive loss carryovers
in a manner which is binding on the partners.
In addition, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017,
we may, but are not required to, make an election to require our
Unitholders to take into account on their income tax returns an
audit adjustment made to our income tax items, also known as a
“push-out” election. This may also require Unitholders to
provide certain information to us (possibly including information
about the beneficial owners of our Unitholders). Also, a
partnership that is a partner of another partnership (such as AB
Holding with respect to AB) may elect to have its unitholders take
an audit adjustment of the lower-tier partnership into account
(i.e., the upper-tier partnership may push adjustments received
from the lower-tier partnership through to the partners of the
upper-tier partnership). There are several requirements to make a
“push-out” election and we may be unable or unwilling to comply
with such requirements. If we do not make a “push-out” election, we
would be required to pay any tax resulting from the adjustments to
our income tax items, and the cash available for distribution to
unitholders would be substantially reduced.
Non-U.S. unitholders may be subject to withholding tax on the sale
of their AB Units or AB Holding Units, as well as on distributions,
and we may be liable for any under-withholding.
Gain or loss from the sale or exchange of a partnership unit by a
non-U.S. unitholder is treated as effectively connected with a U.S.
trade or business and is subject to U.S. federal income tax to the
extent that the non-U.S. unitholder would have had effectively
connected gain or loss on a hypothetical sale by the partnership of
all of its assets at fair market value as of the date of the sale
or exchange of the partnership units. In furtherance of the
foregoing, a transferee of a partnership unit is required to
withhold a tax equal to 10% of the amount realized on any transfer
of such a partnership unit unless an exception
applies.
Distributions by a PTP to a non-U.S. unitholder also are subject to
U.S. withholding tax if the PTP has effectively connected gross
income, gain or loss.
A transferee is not required to withhold tax if it relies on a
certification issued by the transferor or the underlying
partnership establishing that an exception to withholding applies.
If a transferee of AB Units is required to withhold and failed to
properly do so, AB would be required to withhold on distributions
to the transferee to satisfy that liability.
A broker is not required to withhold on the transfer of an interest
in a PTP or on a distribution by a PTP if the PTP certifies that
the "10% exception" applies. This exception applies if, either (1)
the PTP was not engaged in a U.S. trade or business during a
specified time period, or (2) upon a hypothetical sale of the PTP's
assets at fair market value, (i) the amount of net gain that would
have been effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or
business within the U.S. would be less than 10% of the total net
gain, or (ii) no gain would have been effectively connected with
the conduct of a trade or business in the U.S.
To make this certification, the PTP must issue a "qualified notice"
indicating that it qualifies for this exception, which we have done
and intend to continue to do. The qualified notice must state the
amount of a distribution that is attributable to each type of
income group specified in the Treasury Regulations. The PTP must
post each qualified notice on its primary public website (and keep
it accessible for 10 years) and deliver it to any registered holder
that is a nominee. A broker may not rely on such a certification if
it has actual knowledge that the certification is incorrect or
unreliable.
As a PTP, beginning on January 1, 2023, AB Holding may be liable
for any under-withholding by a broker that relies on a qualified
notice for which we failed to make a reasonable estimate of the
amounts required for determining the applicability of the 10%
exception.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Neither AB nor AB Holding has unresolved comments from the staff of
the SEC to report.
Item 2. Properties
Our headquarters is located at 501 Commerce Street, Nashville,
Tennessee. We occupy 218,976 square feet of space at this location
under a 15-year lease agreement that commenced in the fourth
quarter of 2020.
We lease space at our other principal location, 1345 Avenue of the
Americas, New York, New York pursuant to a lease expiring in 2024.
At this location, we currently lease 999,963 square feet of space,
within which we currently occupy approximately 512,284 square feet
of space and have sub-let approximately 487,679 square feet
of space.
Also, we entered into a 20-year lease agreement in New York, New
York, at 66 Hudson Boulevard, for 165,608 square feet that is
expected to commence in 2024.
We also lease 50,792 square feet of space in San Antonio, Texas
under a lease expiring in 2029.
In addition, we lease more modest amounts of space in 23 other
cities in the United States.
Our subsidiaries lease space in 30 cities outside the United
States, the most significant of which is a lease in London,
England, expiring in 2031, and in Hong Kong, China, under a lease
expiring in 2024. In London we currently lease 60,732 square feet
of space. In Hong Kong, we currently lease and occupy 35,878 square
feet of space.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
With respect to all significant litigation matters, we consider the
likelihood of a negative outcome. If we determine the likelihood of
a negative outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be
reasonably estimated, we record an estimated loss for the expected
outcome of the litigation. If the likelihood of a negative outcome
is reasonably possible and we are able to determine an estimate of
the possible loss or range of loss in excess of amounts already
accrued, if any, we disclose that fact together with the estimate
of the possible loss or range of loss. However, it is often
difficult to predict the outcome or estimate a possible loss or
range of loss because litigation is subject to inherent
uncertainties, particularly when plaintiffs allege substantial or
indeterminate damages. Such is also the case when the litigation is
in its early stages or when the litigation is highly complex or
broad in scope. In these cases, we disclose that we are unable to
predict the outcome or estimate a possible loss or range of
loss.
On December 14, 2022, four individual participants in the Profit
Sharing Plan for Employees of AB (the "AB
Profit Sharing Plan")
filed a class action complaint (the "Complaint")
in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
against AB, current and former members of the Compensation and
Workplace Practices Committee of the Board of Directors, and the
Investment and Administrative Committees under the AB Profit
Sharing Plan. Plaintiffs, who seek to represent a class of all
participants in the AB Profit Sharing Plan from December 14, 2016
to the present, allege that defendants violated their fiduciary
duties and engaged in prohibited transactions under ERISA by
including proprietary collective investment trusts as investment
options offered in the AB Profit Sharing Plan. The Complaint seeks
unspecified damages, disgorgement and other equitable relief. AB is
prepared to defend itself vigorously against these claims. While
the outcome of this matter currently is not determinable given the
matter remains in its early stages, we do not believe this
litigation will have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition or liquidity.
AB may be involved in various other matters, including regulatory
inquiries, administrative proceedings and litigation, some of which
may allege significant damages. It is reasonably possible that we
could incur losses pertaining to these matters, but we cannot
currently estimate any such losses.
Management, after consultation with legal counsel, currently
believes that the outcome of any individual matter that is pending
or threatened, or all of them combined, will not have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or
liquidity. However, any inquiry, proceeding or litigation has an
element of uncertainty; management cannot determine whether further
developments relating to any individual matter that is pending or
threatened, or all of them combined, will have a material adverse
effect on our results of operation, financial condition or
liquidity in any future reporting period.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market for AB Holding Units and AB Units; Cash
Distributions
AB Holding Units are listed on the NYSE and trade publicly under
the ticker symbol “AB". There is no established public trading
market for AB Units, which are subject to significant restrictions
on transfer. For information about these transfer
restrictions,
see “Structure-related Risks” in Item 1A.
AB Holding’s principal source of income and cash flow is
attributable to its limited partnership interests in
AB.
Each of AB Holding and AB distributes on a quarterly basis all of
its Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AB Holding Partnership
Agreement and the AB Partnership Agreement, respectively, to its
Unitholders and the General Partner. For additional information
concerning distribution of Available Cash Flow by AB
Holding,
see Note 2 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item
8.
For additional information concerning distribution of Available
Cash Flow by AB,
see Note 2 to AB’s consolidated financial statements in Item
8.
On December 30, 2022 (the last trading day of the year), the
closing price of an AB Holding Unit on the NYSE was $34.37 per
Unit. On December 31, 2022, there were (i) 893 AB Holding
Unitholders of record for approximately 116,000 beneficial owners,
and (ii) 368 AB Unitholders of record (we do not believe there are
substantial additional beneficial owners).
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from
Registered Securities
We did not engage in any unregistered sales of our securities
during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, except as
previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 1,
2022.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated
Purchasers
Each quarter, AB considers whether to implement a plan to
repurchase AB Holding Units pursuant to Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18
under the Exchange Act. We did not, however, adopt a plan during
the fourth quarter of 2022. AB may adopt additional plans in
the future to engage in open-market purchases of AB Holding Units
to help fund anticipated obligations under the firm’s incentive
compensation award program and for other corporate purposes. For
additional information about Rule 10b5-1 plans,
see “Units Outstanding” in Item 7.
AB Holding Units bought by us or one of our affiliates during the
fourth quarter of 2022 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
Total
Number of
AB Holding
Units
Purchased |
Average
Price Paid
Per AB
Holding Unit,
net of
Commissions |
Total
Number of
AB Holding
Units
Purchased as
Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs |
Maximum
Number (or
Approximate
Dollar Value)
of AB
Holding
Units that
May Yet Be
Purchased
Under the
Plans or
Programs |
10/1/22-10/31/22 |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
11/1/22-11/30/22 |
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
12/1/22-12/31/22(1)
|
2,558,363 |
|
|
40.70 |
|
— |
|
— |
Total |
2,558,363 |
|
|
$ |
40.70 |
|
— |
|
— |
(1)During
the fourth quarter of 2022, we purchased 2,558,363 AB Holding Units
from employees to allow them to fulfill statutory withholding tax
requirements at the time of distribution of long-term incentive
compensation awards.
Neither we nor our affiliates bought any AB Units during the fourth
quarter of 2022.
Item 6. [Reserved]
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
Impact of COVID-19
AB continues to actively monitor COVID-19 developments and their
impact on our employees, business and operations. The aggregate
extent to which COVID-19, including its impact on the global
economy, affects AB’s business, liquidity, results of operations
and financial condition, will depend on future COVID-19
developments that are highly uncertain, including the scope and
duration of COVID-19 and any recovery period, the emergence, spread
and seriousness of COVID-19 variants, the continuing prevalence of
severe, unconstrained and/or escalating rates of infection and
hospitalization in various countries and regions, the availability,
adoption and efficacy of treatments and vaccines, and future
actions taken by governmental authorities, central banks and other
parties in response to COVID-19. Further, we have benefited from
certain of our adjusted operating expenses declining significantly
due to COVID-19, generally owing to depressed levels of travel and
entertainment and in-person client meetings, during both 2020 and
2021. While these costs started to return in 2022, results in 2022
did not reach historical levels; the prior-year savings are not
indicative of our future performance. Additionally, as most of our
workforce continues working in a hybrid model, which includes the
option of two remote days each week, we are mindful of increased
risk related to cybersecurity, which could significantly disrupt
our business functions.
Executive Overview(1)
Our total assets under management ("AUM")
as of December 31, 2022 were $646.4 billion, down $132.2 billion,
or 17.0%, during 2022. The decrease was driven primarily by market
depreciation of $140.4 billion and net outflows of $3.6 billion
(reflecting Retail net outflows of $11.6 billion, offset by
Institutional net inflows of $6.3 billion and Private Wealth
Management net inflows of $1.7 billion), offset by the addition of
$12.2 billion due to the acquisition of CarVal Investors L.P.
("CarVal")
in the third quarter. AXA S.A.("AXA")
redeemed approximately $4.5 billion of low-fee fixed income and
equity mandates in 2022. Going forward, any AXA-related redemptions
or new sales (reflecting, for example, recent commitments by AXA to
certain of our private alternative strategies) will be considered
as part of our normal course of business.
Institutional AUM decreased $39.8 billion, or 11.8%, to $297.3
billion during 2022, primarily due to market depreciation of $57.8
billion, partially offset by the addition of $12.2 billion due to
the acquisition of CarVal and net inflows of $6.3 billion. Gross
sales increased $0.5 billion, from $31.7 billion in 2021 to $32.2
billion in 2022. Redemptions and terminations decreased $10.1
billion, from $23.4 billion in 2021 to $13.3 billion in 2022.
Institutional net inflows included $2.3 billion of AXA
redemptions.
Retail AUM decreased $77.0 billion, or 24.1%, to $242.9 billion
during 2022, primarily due to market depreciation of $65.5 billion
and net outflows of $11.6 billion. Net outflows included $2.2
billion of AXA redemptions. Gross sales decreased $34.1 billion,
from $100.0 billion in 2021 to $65.9 billion in 2022. Redemptions
and terminations increased $1.2 billion, from $65.1 billion in 2021
to $66.3 billion in 2022.
Private Wealth Management AUM decreased $15.4 billion, or 12.6%, to
$106.2 billion during 2022, due to market depreciation of $17.1
billion, offset by net inflows of $1.7 billion. Gross sales
decreased $0.8 billion, from $18.3 billion in 2021 to $17.5 billion
in 2022. Redemptions and terminations increased $0.5 billion, from
$15.3 billion in 2021 to $15.8 billion in 2022.
Bernstein Research Services ("BRS")
revenue decreased $35.7 million, or 7.9%, in 2022. The decrease was
driven by significantly lower customer trading activity in Europe
and Asia due to local market conditions. In the fourth quarter of
2022, AB and Société Générale (EURONEXT: SCGLY,
“SocGen”),
a leading European bank, announced plans to form a joint venture
combining their respective cash equities and research businesses.
As a result, the BRS business has been classified as held for sale.
For further discussion,
see Note 24 Acquisitions and Divestitures to our consolidated
financial statements in Item 8.
Our 2022 net revenues of $4.1 billion decreased $387.3 million, or
8.7%, compared to net revenues of $4.4 billion in the prior year.
The decrease was primarily driven by lower base advisory fees of
$123.6 million, higher investment losses of $101.8 million, lower
performance-based fees of $99.9 million, lower distribution
revenues of $45.0 million, lower Bernstein Research Services
revenue of $35.7 million and lower shareholder servicing fees of
$3.6 million, partially offset by higher net dividend and interest
income of $21.6 million. Our operating expenses of $3.2 billion
increased $14.1 million, or 0.4%, compared to the prior year. The
increase was primarily due to higher general and administrative
expenses of $86.0 million, higher amortization of intangible assets
of $20.9 million, higher interest on borrowings of $12.8 million
and higher contingent payment arrangements of $3.9 million, offset
by lower promotion and servicing expenses of $60.1 million and
lower employee compensation and benefits expenses of $49.4 million.
Our operating income decreased $401.4 million, or 33.0%, to $0.8
billion from $1.2 billion in 2021 and our operating margin
decreased to 21.5% in 2022 from 27.3% in 2021.
1
Percentage change figures are calculated using assets under
management rounded to the nearest million, while financial
statement amounts are rounded to the nearest hundred
thousand.
Market Environment
While equity markets were positive in the fourth quarter of 2022,
with the S&P 500 Index ("S&P")
and Dow Jones Industrial Average both registering gains, both
indexes declined for the full year ended December 31, 2022. The
S&P declined 18.1% for the full year, while the Nasdaq declined
by 33.1% and was down 8.7% in December. Inflation remains the
dominant issue for U.S. markets, fueling consumer concerns of a
potential recession. While the U.S. consumer has been largely
resilient so far, higher interest rates have weighed on home
building, trade and business investments. Despite signs that the
labor market and inflation are easing, the Federal Reserve has
maintained its aggressive stance on monetary policy. At its
December meeting, the Federal Reserve increased interest rates and
indicated that, while future rate increases are likely to be less
severe, they continue to be needed.
In the U.K., the new prime minister reversed the tax cuts
introduced by his predecessor and added some tax increases. These
actions calmed the market and reduced the pressure on mortgage
rates. However, monetary tightening, steep energy prices and
supply-side constraints from Brexit create a challenging outlook
for consumers.
In China, key watch-points include the property market and overall
growth in the economy. The Chinese government has announced new
support measures, but it is unclear whether these measures will be
sufficient to re-create historical growth patterns.
Relationship with EQH and its Subsidiaries
EQH
(our parent company)
and its subsidiaries are our largest client. EQH is collaborating
with AB in order to improve the risk-adjusted yield for the General
Accounts of EQH's insurance subsidiaries by investing additional
assets at AB, including the utilization of AB's higher-fee,
longer-duration alternative offerings. Equitable Financial Life
Insurance Company, a subsidiary of EQH ("Equitable
Financial"),
has agreed to provide $10 billion in permanent
capital2
to build out AB's private illiquid offerings, including private
alternatives and private placements. Deployment of this capital
commitment is more than 50% completed and is expected to continue
over approximately the next two years. We expect this anticipated
capital from Equitable Financial will continue to accelerate both
organic and inorganic growth in our private alternatives business,
allowing us to continue to deliver for our clients, employees,
unitholders and other stakeholders. For example, included in this
$10 billion commitment by EQH is $750 million in capital to be
deployed through AB CarVal.
Relocation Strategy
As previously announced, we have established our corporate
headquarters in Nashville, TN, at 501 Commerce Street. Our
Nashville headquarters houses Finance, IT, Operations, Legal,
Compliance, Internal Audit, Human Capital, and Sales and Marketing,
and at year-end 2022 we had 1,079 employees in Nashville. We expect
to reach a total of 1,250 employees in Nashville by the end of
2024. We will continue to maintain a principal location in New York
City, which houses our Portfolio Management, Sell-Side Research and
Trading, and New York-based Private Wealth Management
businesses.
We believe relocating our corporate headquarters to Nashville
affords us the opportunity to provide an improved quality of life
alternative for our employees and enables us to attract and recruit
new talented employees to a highly desirable location while
improving the long-term cost structure of the firm.
During the transition period, which began in 2018 and is expected
to continue through 2024, we currently estimate that we will incur
transition costs of between $145 million to $155 million. These
costs include employee relocation, severance, recruitment, and
overlapping compensation and occupancy costs. Over this same
period, we expect to realize total expense savings of between $205
million to $215 million. However, we did incur some transition
costs before we began to realize expense savings. For the period
beginning in 2018 and ending in the fourth quarter of 2022, we
incurred $120 million of cumulative transition costs compared to
$132 million of cumulative savings. In addition, we incurred $24
million of transition costs for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2022, compared to $43 million of expense savings,
resulting in an overall net savings of $19 million for the period.
In 2022, our net income per unit ("EPU")
increased $0.07 as a result of our relocation strategy, which
compares to the $0.06 EPU increase that occurred in 2021. We also
expect to achieve EPU accretion in each future year. Beginning in
2025, once the transition period has been completed, we estimate
ongoing annual expense savings of approximately $75 million to $80
million, which will result from a combination of occupancy and
compensation-related savings. Our estimates for both the transition
costs and the corresponding expense savings are based on our
current assumptions of employee relocation costs, severance, and
overlapping compensation and occupancy costs. In addition, our
estimates for both the timing of when we incur transition costs and
realize the related expense savings are based on our current
relocation implementation plan and the timing for execution of each
phase. The actual total charges we eventually record, the related
expense savings we realize, and the timing of EPU impact may differ
from our current estimates as we implement each phase of our
headquarters relocation.
2
Permanent capital means investment capital of indefinite duration,
which may be withdrawn under certain conditions. Although Equitable
Financial has indicated its intention over time to provide this
investment capital to AB, which is mutually beneficial to both
firms, it has no binding commitment to do so.
During October 2018, we signed a lease, which commenced in the
fourth quarter of 2020, relating to 218,976 square feet of space at
our new Nashville headquarters. Our estimated total base rent
obligation (excluding taxes, operating expenses and utilities) over
the 15-year initial lease term is $134 million.
Although we have presented many of our transition costs and annual
expense savings with numerical specificity, and we believe these
targets to be reasonable as of the date of this report, the
uncertainties surrounding the assumptions we discuss above create a
significant risk that these targets may not be
achieved. Accordingly, the expenses we actually incur and the
savings we actually realize may differ from our targets,
particularly if actual events adversely differ from one or more of
our key assumptions. The transition costs and expense savings,
together with their underlying assumptions, are Forward-Looking
Statements and can be affected by any of the factors discussed
in
“Risk Factors”
and
“Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”
in this 2022 10-K. We strongly caution investors not to place undue
reliance on any of these assumptions or our cost and expense
targets. Except as may be required by applicable securities laws,
we are not under any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any
obligation, to update or alter any assumptions, estimates,
financial goals, targets, projections or other related statements
that we may make.
AB Holding
AB Holding’s principal source of income and cash flow is
attributable to its investment in AB Units. The AB Holding
financial statements, notes to the financial statements and
management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations (“MD&A”)
should be read in conjunction with those of AB.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31 |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
|
2022-21 |
2021-20 |
|
(in thousands, except per unit amounts) |
|
|
|
Net income attributable to AB Unitholders |
|
$ |
831,813 |
|
|
$ |
1,148,623 |
|
|
$ |
865,952 |
|
|
(27.6) |
% |
32.6 |
% |
Weighted average equity ownership interest |
|
36.7 |
% |
|
36.2 |
% |
|
35.6 |
% |
|
|
|
Equity in net income attributable to AB Unitholders |
|
$ |
305,504 |
|
|
$ |
416,326 |
|
|
$ |
308,404 |
|
|
(26.6) |
|
35.0 |
|
Income taxes |
|
31,339 |
|
|
30,483 |
|
|
29,024 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
5.0 |
|
Net income of AB Holding |
|
$ |
274,165 |
|
|
$ |
385,843 |
|
|
$ |
279,380 |
|
|
(28.9) |
|
38.1 |
|
Diluted net income per AB Holding Unit |
|
$ |
2.69 |
|
|
$ |
3.88 |
|
|
$ |
2.88 |
|
|
(30.7) |
|
34.7 |
|
Distributions per AB Holding Unit (1)
|
|
$ |
2.95 |
|
|
$ |
3.90 |
|
|
$ |
2.91 |
|
|
(24.4) |
|
34.0 |
|
(1)Distributions
reflect the impact of AB’s non-GAAP adjustments.
AB Holding had net income of $274.2 million in 2022 compared to
$385.8 million in 2021, reflecting lower net income attributable to
AB Unitholders, partially offset by higher weighted average equity
ownership interest. AB Holding had net income of $385.8 million in
2021 compared to $279.4 million in 2020, reflecting higher net
income attributable to AB Unitholders and higher weighted average
equity ownership interest.
AB Holding's partnership gross income is derived from its interest
in AB. AB Holding’s income taxes, which reflect a 3.5% federal tax
on its partnership gross income from the active conduct of a trade
or business, are computed by multiplying certain AB qualifying
revenues (primarily U.S. investment advisory fees, brokerage
commissions and direct payments for research services) by AB
Holding’s ownership interest in AB, multiplied by the 3.5% tax
rate. AB Holding’s effective tax rate was 10.3% in 2022, 7.3% in
2021 and 9.4% in 2020.
See Note 6 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item
8 for
a further description.
As supplemental information, AB provides the performance measures
“adjusted net revenues,” “adjusted operating income” and “adjusted
operating margin,” which are the principal metrics management uses
in evaluating and comparing the period-to-period operating
performance of AB. Management principally uses these metrics in
evaluating performance because they present a clearer picture of
AB's operating performance and allow management to see long-term
trends without the distortion primarily caused by long-term
incentive compensation-related mark-to-market adjustments, real
estate charges (discussed
below in Adjusted Operating Income)
and other adjustment items. Similarly, management believes that
these management operating metrics help investors better understand
the underlying trends in AB's results and, accordingly, provide a
valuable perspective for investors. Such measures are not based on
generally accepted accounting principles (“non-GAAP
measures”).
These non-GAAP measures are provided in addition to, and not as
substitutes for, net revenues, operating income and operating
margin, and they may not be comparable to non-GAAP measures
presented by other companies. Management uses both GAAP and
non-GAAP measures in evaluating the company’s financial
performance. The non-GAAP measures alone may pose limitations
because they do not include all of AB’s revenues and expenses.
Further, adjusted diluted net income per AB Holding Unit is not a
liquidity measure and should not be used in place of cash flow
measures.
See “Management Operating Metrics” in this Item
7.
The impact of these adjustments on AB Holding’s net income and
diluted net income per AB Holding Unit are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31 |
|
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
|
|
(in thousands, except per unit amounts) |
AB non-GAAP adjustments, before taxes |
|
$ |
75,745 |
|
|
$ |
2,959 |
|
|
$ |
6,393 |
|
AB Income tax (expense) benefit on non-GAAP adjustments |
|
(6,395) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
(523) |
|
AB non-GAAP adjustments, after taxes |
|
69,350 |
|
|
3,030 |
|
|
5,870 |
|
AB Holding’s weighted average equity ownership interest in
AB |
|
36.7 |
% |
|
36.2 |
% |
|
35.6 |
% |
Impact on AB Holding’s net income of AB non-GAAP
adjustments |
|
$ |
25,468 |
|
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
$ |
2,090 |
|
Net income - diluted, GAAP basis |
|
$ |
274,167 |
|
|
$ |
385,873 |
|
|
$ |
279,436 |
|
Impact on AB Holding’s net income of AB non-GAAP
adjustments |
|
25,468 |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
2,090 |
|
Adjusted net income - diluted |
|
$ |
299,635 |
|
|
$ |
386,971 |
|
|
$ |
281,526 |
|
Diluted net income per AB Holding Unit, GAAP basis |
|
$ |
2.69 |
|
|
$ |
3.88 |
|
|
$ |
2.88 |
|
Impact of AB non-GAAP adjustments |
|
0.25 |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
0.03 |
|
Adjusted diluted net income per AB Holding Unit |
|
$ |
2.94 |
|
|
$ |
3.89 |
|
|
$ |
2.91 |
|
The degree to which AB’s non-GAAP adjustments impact AB Holding’s
net income fluctuates based on AB Holding's ownership percentage in
AB.
Tax Legislation
For a discussion of tax legislation,
see “Risk Factors - Structure-related Risks” in Item
1A.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
During the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash provided by
operating activities was $362.6 million, compared to $355.1 million
during the corresponding 2021 period. The increase primarily
resulted from higher cash distributions received from AB of $9.3
million. During the year ended December 31, 2021, net cash
provided by operating activities was $355.1 million, compared to
$270.0 million during the corresponding 2020 period. The increase
primarily resulted from higher cash distributions received from AB
of $86.3 million.
During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, net
cash used in investing activities was $1.8 million, $3.4 million
and $0.1 million, respectively, reflecting investments in AB with
proceeds from exercises of compensatory options to buy AB Holding
Units and capital contributions to AB.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash used in
financing activities was $360.8 million, compared to $351.7 million
during the corresponding 2021 period. The increase was due to cash
distributions to Unitholders of $3.5 million and proceeds from
exercise of compensatory options to buy AB Holding Units of $3.2
million, offset by lower capital contributions from AB of $2.3
million. During the year ended December 31, 2021, net cash
used in financing activities was $351.7 million, compared to $269.9
million during the corresponding 2020 period. The increase
primarily was due to higher cash distributions to Unitholders of
$86.6 million, offset by higher proceeds from exercise of
compensatory options to buy AB Holding Units of $3.3
million.
Management believes that AB Holding will have the resources it
needs to meet its financial obligations as a result of the cash
flow AB Holding realizes from its investment in AB.
Cash Distributions
AB Holding is required to distribute all of its Available Cash
Flow, as defined in the AB Holding Partnership Agreement, to its
Unitholders (including the General Partner). Available Cash Flow
typically is the adjusted diluted net income per unit for the
quarter multiplied by the number of units outstanding at the end of
the quarter. Management anticipates that Available Cash Flow will
continue to be based on adjusted diluted net income per unit,
unless management determines, with concurrence of the Board of
Directors, that one or more adjustments made to adjusted net income
should not be made with respect to the Available Cash Flow
calculation.
See Note 2 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8
for a description of Available Cash Flow.
Commitments and Contingencies
For a discussion of commitments and contingencies,
see Note 7 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item
8.
AB
Assets Under Management
Assets under management by distribution channel are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31 |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
|
2022-21 |
2021-20 |
|
(in billions) |
|
|
|
Institutions |
|
$ |
297.3 |
|
|
$ |
337.1 |
|
|
$ |
315.6 |
|
|
(11.8 |
%) |
6.8 |
% |
Retail |
|
242.9 |
|
|
319.9 |
|
|
265.3 |
|
|
(24.1) |
|
20.6 |
|
Private Wealth Management |
|
106.2 |
|
|
121.6 |
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
(12.6) |
|
15.8 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
646.4 |
|
|
$ |
778.6 |
|
|
$ |
685.9 |
|
|
(17.0) |
|
13.5 |
|
Assets under management by investment service are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31 |
|
% Change |
|
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
|
2022-21 |
2021-20 |
|
(in billions) |
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actively Managed |
|
$ |
217.9 |
|
|
$ |
287.6 |
|
|
$ |
217.8 |
|
|
(24.2 |
%) |
32.1 |
% |
Passively Managed(1)
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
71.6 |
|
|
64.5 |
|
|
(24.8) |
|
10.9 |
|
Total Equity |
|
271.7 |
|
|
359.2 |
|
|
282.3 |
|
|
(24.3) |
|
27.2 |
|
Fixed Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actively Managed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
190.3 |
|
|
246.3 |
|
|
263.2 |
|
|
(22.8) |
|
(6.4) |
|
Tax–exempt |
|
52.5 |
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
50.3 |
|
|
(7.9) |
|
13.6 |
|
Total |
|
242.8 |
|
|
303.4 |
|
|
313.5 |
|
|
(20.0) |
|
(3.2) |
|
Passively Managed(1)
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
(28.9) |
|
55.3 |
|
Total Fixed Income |
|
252.2 |
|
|
316.6 |
|
|
322.0 |
|
|
(20.3) |
|
(1.7) |
|
Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actively Managed |
|
115.8 |
|
|
97.3 |
|
|
79.1 |
|
|
19.1 |
|
23.0 |
|
Passively Managed(1)
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
21.5 |
|
116.6 |
|
Total Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions |
|
122.5 |
|
|
102.8 |
|
|
81.6 |
|
|
19.2 |
|
25.9 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
646.4 |
|
|
$ |
778.6 |
|
|
$ |
|