By Sebastian Herrera and Tim Higgins
California sued Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. for
allegedly misclassifying their drivers as independent contractors
instead of employees, a move that intensifies a battle between the
ride-hailing giants and their home state.
California, which is suing the companies under authority granted
by a new state law and under the California Competition Law, said
the decision to classify drivers as contractors has deprived them
of rights such as paid sick leave and unemployment insurance.
"We believe it's time for all workers to be treated fairly,"
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said Tuesday.
"Innovation, regardless of what Uber and Lyft tell you, doesn't
require these companies to mistreat their workers."
The state, which seeks up to millions of dollars in civil
penalties and to force the companies by a court order to reclassify
their drivers and restore unpaid wages, also said Uber and Lyft
haven't contributed state payroll taxes used to fund general health
welfare programs. The lawsuit was filed with the city attorneys of
San Francisco, where Uber and Lyft are based, and Los Angeles and
San Diego.
Uber and Lyft have maintained that their drivers are properly
classified after the state passed the so-called gig economy law
last year and Gov. Gavin Newsom signed it. The law codified a test
companies must pass to classify their workers as independent
contractors, which enables companies to avoid costly benefits such
as health care. Uber and Lyft have said the law could take away
flexibility for drivers and force them to work pre-scheduled
shifts.
"We are looking forward to working with the Attorney General and
mayors across the state to bring all the benefits of California's
innovation economy to as many workers as possible, especially
during this time when the creation of good jobs with access to
affordable health care and other benefits is more important than
ever," a spokeswoman for Lyft said in a statement.
An Uber spokesman said the company would contest the action in
court. "At a time when California's economy is in crisis with four
million people out of work, we need to make it easier, not harder,
for people to quickly start earning," the spokesman said.
Lyft has said it has 325,000 drivers in California. Uber has
said it has more than 200,000.
The legal battle comes as the coronavirus pandemic has raised an
unprecedented crisis for the ride-hailing companies. Ridership has
plummeted as governments have encouraged or ordered people to
shelter in homes and closed nonessential businesses in a bid to
stop the spread of Covid-19.
Spending on Uber and Lyft rides plunged 83% during the week of
April 20 in the U.S. compared with a year ago, according to data
from researcher Edison Trends.
Uber drivers have turned to the food-delivery business while
ride-hailing has languished. The company has pulled its guidance
ahead of reporting first-quarter financial results on Thursday.
Lyft last week announced it was cutting 17% of its workforce and
instituting unpaid furloughs and salary cuts for those who remain.
The company reports first-quarter results on Wednesday.
The confrontation highlights the difficulties in the pandemic
for some workers on the front lines, including those making
deliveries, who may not have benefits such as sick pay. A number of
companies have provided paid sick leave only in the event of a
positive Covid-19 diagnosis for some workers.
Many drivers have talked about the conundrum they face: Drive
and risk getting sick, or stay home and don't get paid.
"The pandemic highlights the danger of the work these essential
workers are doing," San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera said
Tuesday.
Los Angeles City Attorney Mike Feuer said he expected the
lawsuit to create a ripple effect throughout the gig economy.
"Misclassification means cheating," he said. "We are here to
make sure no company gets an advantage over the other."
Uber, Lyft and several other companies have amassed more than
$110 million to pass a November ballot initiative to exempt
themselves from the law. Uber, along with food delivery company
Postmates Inc., late last year filed a lawsuit challenging the law.
It is unclear how those plans have been affected by the impact
coronavirus is expected to have on elections and organizing.
Since it was passed last fall, the new California law has
prompted opposition from a number of industries, including
free-lance journalism and trucking. Uber and Lyft have been among
the most organized opponents of the legislation.
The companies have said the law doesn't apply to their
businesses but have also warned that if they are forced to
reclassify their drivers, it could force them to hire far fewer
drivers and reduce the areas where they operate.
Although the companies have said their workers are properly
classified, they see their ballot initiative as a potential legal
shield for lawsuits. The initiative, if passed in November, would
promise benefits such as health care for drivers who work a certain
amount of hours a week but also seeks to eliminate any lawsuits in
the past year.
A group representing the companies in March said more than one
million signatures had been collected, nearly double the number
required to qualify for the November ballot.
Uber is " pushing to raise the standard of independent work for
drivers in California, including with guaranteed minimum earnings
and new benefits," the Uber spokesman said.
Write to Sebastian Herrera at Sebastian.Herrera@wsj.com and Tim
Higgins at Tim.Higgins@WSJ.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
May 05, 2020 16:20 ET (20:20 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Lyft (NASDAQ:LYFT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Lyft (NASDAQ:LYFT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024