Civil-Rights Groups Express Disappointment With Facebook Meeting
July 07 2020 - 7:14PM
Dow Jones News
By Jeff Horwitz and Deepa Seetharaman
Civil rights advocates came out of a meeting Tuesday with
Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg saying they didn't make
any progress toward breaking their impasse with the social media
giant over how it polices the platform.
The lack of headway, one week into a boycott by some of the
company's top advertisers over the issue, points toward the
likelihood of a protracted campaign that could extend beyond July,
the original time frame. The organizers said they're asking more
advertisers to pause their spend on Facebook globally.
"Facebook had our demands in multiple ways, and they showed up
to the meeting expecting an A for attendance," said Rashad
Robinson, head of the Color of Change, a progressive advocacy group
for Black communities.
After years of simmering discontent and requests for change, a
coalition including Anti-Defamation League and Color of Change are
making the case that Mr. Zuckerberg and Facebook haven't combated
racism and misinformation on its platforms in good faith. Top
brands including Unilever and Clorox have agreed to pause
advertising on the platform in a show of solidarity with demands
Facebook do more.
In response to the discontent, Mr. Zuckerberg had pledged to
reconsider its policies around discussion of the government's use
of force. The company has also said it would begin labeling
politicians' posts that have violated its content standards but are
protected by Facebook on the grounds that they are newsworthy.
"They want Facebook to be free of hate speech and so do we," the
company said in a statement after the meeting. The company said it
has invested billions of dollars in content moderation and taken
hundreds of white supremacist entities off its platforms. "We know
we will be judged by our actions not by our words and are grateful
to these groups and many others for their continued
engagement."
The meeting over Zoom lasted a little over an hour and involved
Mr. Zuckerberg, Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg, product
chief Chris Cox, other members of Facebook's policy team and a
product official, the groups said.
"Today we saw little and heard just about nothing," said
Jonathan Greenblatt, chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League,
which is devoted to combating anti-Semitic speech.
On paper, the differences between Facebook and civil rights
organizations seem limited. Both agree that incitements to violence
have no place on Facebook, that hate speech should be suppressed
and that the company should vet its products for potential bias.
While there are meaningful disagreements about subjects including
Facebook's refusal to fact-check political advertising, Facebook
has said it broadly shares the protesters' goals.
But the civil-rights groups argue that Facebook hasn't lived up
to its past commitments to address misinformation, hate speech,
radicalization and brand-safety concerns. A turning point came with
Mr. Zuckerberg's free-speech talk at Georgetown University in
October, when the executive framed Facebook as a democratically
essential "fifth estate." Mr. Zuckerberg framed progressive calls
to restrain rhetoric on the platform as a greater risk than civil
rights' leaders concerns about the platform's misuse.
Bernice King said the talk failed to acknowledge how tolerance
for toxic rhetoric set the table for the assassination of her
father, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Vanita Gupta, who as
head of the Leadership Conference on Civil & Human Rights had
been one of the most active liaisons to Facebook, wondered "if
there's any point to engagement at all."
The gap has only widened since protests over police killings of
Black Americans and President Trump's social media-led rhetoric
about Black Lives Matter protesters, alleged corruption in absentee
voting and the historical value of Confederate monuments. After
Twitter labeled Mr. Trump's tweet -- that "when the looting starts
the shooting starts" -- as an incitement to violence, civil rights
groups seized on Facebook's unwillingness to do the same.
Sahil Patel contributed to this article.
Write to Jeff Horwitz at Jeff.Horwitz@wsj.com and Deepa
Seetharaman at Deepa.Seetharaman@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
July 07, 2020 18:59 ET (22:59 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024