UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy Statement
Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
☑ |
Filed by the Registrant |
☐ |
Filed by a party other than the Registrant |
|
CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX: |
☐ |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission
Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☑ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ |
|
Definitive Additional
Materials |
☐ |
|
Soliciting Material under
§240.14a-12 |

Comcast Corporation
(Name of Registrant
as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK ALL BOXES
THAT APPLY): |
☑ |
|
No fee required |
☐ |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary
materials |
☐ |
|
Fee computed on table in exhibit
required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11 |
Table of
Contents

Notice of
2022 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders
and Proxy Statement
Table of
Contents
2021 Company
Highlights
Strong Execution on
Key Strategic Priorities
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Connectivity |
|
|
Aggregation |
|
|
Streaming |
$19
billion
investment
in Comcast Cable’s network since 2017 has enabled us to stay ahead
of demand
1.3
million
broadband
customer net additions in the U.S. in 2021
1.2
million
wireless
customer line net additions in the U.S. in 2021, the best annual
result since the launch of Xfinity Mobile in 2017
|
|
|
Increased customer
penetration of X1, Flex & Sky Q
provided
more of our customers with our leading aggregation
platforms
Launched
Sky Glass in the U.K. and XClass TV in the U.S.
powered by
Comcast’s global technology platform, which accelerated the new
products’ speed to market and provides customers with advanced
technology features and functionality
|
|
|
Peacock
monthly active accounts in the U.S. reached 24.5 million at
year-end
Launched
nationwide in July 2020, NBCUniversal’s differentiated,
ad-supported streaming service leverages technologies and
capabilities from across the company
Established SkyShowtime
in partnership with Paramount
Subscription video on
demand service to launch in more than 20 new markets in Europe
starting in 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital
Equity |
|
|
Diversity,
Equity & Inclusion |
|
|
Environmental
Sustainability |
Addressing Digital
Inequities
10
million+
low-income
Americans connected to the internet over the last decade through
Internet Essentials, which we believe is the nation’s largest and
most comprehensive broadband adoption program for low-income
families
Community
Impact
1,000 WiFi-Connected
Lift Zones
opened in
community centers nationwide for low-income families by the end of
2021
|
|
|
Workforce Leadership
Diversity
42% women & 24%
people of color
in our VP+
population, and 36% women & 45% people of color in our overall
workforce, based on U.S. full-time employees as of year-end 2021
Supplier
Diversity
At
least $3 billion annual spend
with
diverse suppliers during each of the past 5 years, with over $4.3
billion spent with diverse Tier 1 vendors and over $390 million
spent with diverse Tier 2 subcontractors in 2021
|
|
|
Carbon
Neutral by 2035
Goal to be
carbon neutral by 2035 in Scope 1 and 2 emissions across our global
operations
Focused
on Renewable Energy
Long-term
purchase agreement for renewable electricity signed in 2021 to
power approximately 12% of our current U.S. electricity use
beginning in 2024-2025
|
NOTE ABOUT
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND WEBSITE REFERENCES
This
proxy statement includes estimates, projections and statements
relating to our business plans, objectives and expected operating
results and statements regarding environmental, social and
governance-related plans and goals that are “forward-looking
statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange
Act”). Forward-looking statements may appear throughout this
report. These forward-looking statements generally are identified
by the words “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,”
“estimate,” “intend,” “potential,” “strategy,” “future,”
“opportunity,” “commit,” “plan,” “goal,” “may,” “should,” “could,”
“will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result”
and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on
current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and
uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially.
In evaluating these statements, you should consider various
factors, including the risks and uncertainties we describe in the
“Risk Factors” sections of our Forms 10-K and 10-Q and other
reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”).
Additionally, none of
the statements, reports, policies or other content on our website,
or any other websites or reports referenced or discussed in this
proxy statement, are deemed to be part of, or incorporated by
reference into, this proxy statement. The inclusion of
forward-looking and other statements in this proxy statement or on
our website that may address our corporate responsibility
initiatives, progress, plans and goals is not an indication that
they are necessarily material to investors or required to be
disclosed in our filings with the SEC. Such statements may contain
estimates, make assumptions based on developing standards that may
change and provide aspirational goals and commitments that are not
intended to be promises or guarantees. Readers are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and such other
statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. We
undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any
forward-looking or such other statements, whether because of new
information, future events or otherwise.
|
2
Table of
Contents
Message from Our Chairman, President and CEO
and Our Lead Independent Director
Dear
Shareholders,
2021 was an
outstanding year for Comcast. Our financial results were the
strongest in our company’s history – generating record high levels
of revenue, Adjusted EBITDA, and Free Cash Flow – and we returned
significant amounts of capital to shareholders through share
repurchases of $4 billion and dividends paid of $4.5
billion.
At the same
time, we continued to innovate and deliver world-class connectivity
and entertainment to millions of consumers across the globe. We
launched exciting new products – including Sky Glass and XClass TV
– leveraging the power of our global technology platform. We
brought must-watch content to viewers across our television
networks and through our fast-growing streaming service, Peacock.
Our Theme Parks had a phenomenal year, adding new attractions and
parks and reporting the most profitable fourth quarter on record,
despite limited international guest attendance. Meanwhile, we
continued to strengthen, evolve, and expand our core connectivity
business, which led to significant customer additions in
2021.
Importantly, in all our
work, we remain guided by our core values and an unwavering
commitment to our communities. We accelerated our efforts to
advance diversity, equity, and inclusion, and made new investments
in digital equity programs that will enable us to continue to
connect more people to the tools and resources needed to succeed in
today’s digital world. We also announced a new environmental goal
to be carbon neutral in Scopes 1 and 2 emissions across our global
operations by 2035.
None of
this would be possible without the remarkable dedication and talent
of our nearly 190,000 employees, and the stewardship of our Board
of Directors. We’d like to take this opportunity to thank our
fellow directors, and especially Nomi Bergman for her invaluable
insight and leadership during her tenure. The Board aims to further
refresh its membership in the coming years, with a continued focus
on diverse candidates.
As we enter
2022, we do so with great momentum and tremendous gratitude for
your continued support of Comcast. We are proud to lead this
remarkable company.
Sincerely,
 |
 |
|
|
Brian L.
Roberts
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
Edward D.
Breen
Lead Independent
Director
|
2022 Proxy
Statement 3
Table of
Contents
Notice of 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
of Comcast Corporation

|
Voting
Items |
Board Voting
Recommendation |
|
|
|
DATE
June 1, 2022
TIME
Online check-in opens: 8:45 a.m. Eastern Time Meeting begins: 9:00
a.m. Eastern Time
PLACE
Meeting live via the internet:
comcast.onlineshareholdermeeting.com
WHO CAN VOTE
Shareholders of record on April 4, 2022
|
PROPOSAL 1
Elect directors
|
FOR each nominee
|
PROPOSAL 2
Advisory vote to approve
executive compensation
|
FOR
|
PROPOSAL 3
Ratify appointment of
independent auditors
|
FOR
|
PROPOSALS 4-8
Vote on shareholder proposals
|
AGAINST
|
Only
shareholders of record on April 4, 2022 may vote and participate
during the meeting. If the meeting is adjourned because a quorum is
not present, then shareholders who attend the reconvened meeting
will constitute a quorum for the purpose of acting upon the matters
presented at that meeting pursuant to the rules described in
“Voting Securities and Principal Holders — Outstanding Shares and
Voting Rights” in the attached proxy statement.
The Notice
of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is being mailed, and
the attached proxy statement is being made available, to our
shareholders beginning on or about April 22, 2022.
Your
vote is important. Please vote your shares promptly. To vote your
shares, you can:
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Use the
internet, as described in the Notice of Internet Availability of
Proxy Materials and on your proxy card. |
|
Call
the toll-free telephone number set forth in the attached proxy
statement and on your proxy card. |
|
Complete, sign and date
your proxy card and return your proxy card by mail. |
April 22,
2022

THOMAS J.
REID
Secretary
Important
Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to Be Held on June 1, 2022: Our proxy
statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended
December
31, 2021 are available at www.proxyvote.com. |
4
Table of
Contents
Table of Contents
2022 Proxy
Statement 5
Table of
Contents
About Comcast
Our
Company
Comcast
Corporation (“Comcast,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”) is a
global media and technology company that connects people to moments
that matter. We are principally focused on connectivity,
aggregation and streaming with over 57 million customer
relationships across the United States and Europe. We deliver
broadband, video and wireless services through our Xfinity, Comcast
Business and Sky brands; create, distribute and stream leading
entertainment, sports and news through Universal Filmed
Entertainment Group, Universal Studio Group, Sky Studios, the NBC
and Telemundo broadcast networks, Peacock, NBC News, NBC Sports,
Sky News and Sky Sports; and provide memorable experiences at
Universal Parks and Resorts in the United States and
Asia.
2021 Performance
Overview
Over the
past two years, Mr. Roberts and our senior leadership team have
successfully led our company through the pandemic as the world
continued to navigate ongoing challenges, achieving strong
operating and financial results and underscoring the strength and
resilience of our business. Our relentless focus on innovation and
execution, balanced with financial discipline, enabled us to
deliver record-high financial results in 2021, invest for the
future and increase our return of capital to
shareholders.
During
2021, some of our businesses continued their strong financial and
operating performance while others continued to recover from the
global pandemic. At Comcast Cable, the significant investments we
have made in our technology and network over the years to stay
ahead of demand and to maintain speed and reliability continued to
differentiate our broadband experience, leading to 1.3 million net
new broadband customers in 2021 and bringing total broadband
subscribers to 31.9 million at year end.
While the
global pandemic continued to have some negative impacts on
NBCUniversal and Sky, our teams led strong recoveries and posted
results that surpassed our expectations leading into 2021. At
NBCUniversal, our theme parks performed exceptionally well,
reopening safely with strong attendance and financial results,
while also adding new attractions and opening Universal Beijing
Resort. Peacock, our streaming service that launched in mid-2020,
showed significant growth in monthly active accounts and revenue
relative to 2020. In 2021, programming and production levels
normalized at both NBCUniversal and Sky, and we continue to
monetize our intellectual property through creative new options for
content licensing windows and distribution.
We also
worked together across our complementary, high-performing business
units to continue to accelerate convergence in media and
technology. In 2021, as we sought to expand the reach of our
proprietary global technology platform and addressable customer
base, we launched Sky Glass in the United Kingdom and XClass TV in
the United States. Both of these products are built upon our
existing investments across our company in X1, Flex and Sky
Q.
In addition
to delivering for our shareholders, our Board credits Mr. Roberts
and our senior leadership team for their continued support of our
other stakeholders, including our employees, customers, suppliers
and the communities where we operate. From our continued leadership
in addressing the digital divide, to our ongoing efforts and
further progress in diversity, equity and inclusion and community
impact, to taking further steps to lessen our environmental
footprint, our senior leadership team led by example and reinforced
our company’s commitment to doing what’s right while underscoring
our commitment to act with integrity. See “Spotlight on our
Corporate Responsibility Initiatives” for additional
information.
Financial
Performance
Our 2021
consolidated operating and financial results were strong, with
contributions from across our company, underscoring our business
resilience, strategic decision-making and capital allocation
priorities, all driven with a view toward growth and creating
long-term value. As vaccination rates increased and restrictive
government mandates subsided at various points throughout the
course of 2021, the exceptional leadership of our management team
helped our business operations and financial performance to rebound
more quickly than expected as compared to 2020 performance,
underscored by our growth across many of our financial
metrics.
6
Table of
Contents
REVENUE
($ in
billions)
|
|
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE
TO COMCAST
($ in
billions)
|
|
ADJUSTED EBITDA(1)
($ in
billions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED
BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
($ in
billions)

|
|
FREE CASH FLOW(1)(2)
($ in
billions)

|
|
(1) Reconciliations
of consolidated Adjusted EBITDA to net income attributable to
Comcast Corporation and consolidated Free Cash Flow to net cash
provided by operating activities are set forth in Appendix
A.
(2) 2021
Free Cash Flow of $17.1 billion includes a $1.3 billion benefit
related to the tax impact of a bond exchange completed in August
2021 and roughly $1 billion from returns on investing
activities.
|
$140 $105
$35 $70 $0 $108.9 $103.6 $116.4 2019 2020 2021 $13.1 $10.5 $14.2 $0
$4 $8 $12 $16 2019 2020 2021 $34.3 $30.8 $34.7 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40
2019 2020 2021 $35 2019 2020 2021 $13.4 $13.3 $17.1 $0 $5 $10 $15
$20 2019 2020 2021 $25.7 $24.7 $29.1 $28 $7 $14 $21 $0
2021 key
reported results across our three primary businesses
included:
● |
Comcast Cable (whose
results are reported in our Cable Communications segment) revenue
increased 7.1% to $64.3 billion, and Adjusted EBITDA increased
11.2% to $28.1 billion. |
|
|
● |
NBCUniversal’s Media,
Studios and Theme Parks segment revenue increased 20.3%, 16.2% and
141.2% to $22.8 billion, $9.4 billion and $5.1 billion,
respectively, while Adjusted EBITDA was $4.6 billion, $0.9 billion
and $1.3 billion, respectively. NBCUniversal results now include
the operations of Peacock. |
|
|
● |
Sky
revenue increased 9.1% to $20.3 billion, or 3.1% excluding the
impact of foreign currency. Sky Adjusted EBITDA increased 20.8% to
$2.4 billion, or 10.2% excluding the impact of foreign currency.
See Appendix A for a reconciliation. |
We resumed
our share repurchase program in May 2021 after pausing the program
in 2019 to accelerate the reduction of indebtedness we incurred in
connection with our acquisition of Sky. In addition, we made four
cash dividend payments totaling $4.5 billion in 2021 and announced
an increase to the planned annual dividend by $0.08 per share, or
8%, to $1.08 per share on an annualized basis for 2022 – the 14th
consecutive annual increase.
Stock
Performance
Our total
shareholder return (“TSR”) over the 10-year period ending December
31, 2021 is reflected below, with our performance over the long
term outperforming the S&P 500.
COMCAST’S TSR VS. THE
S&P 500 SINCE YE 2010*
 |
|
* Cumulative
total shareholder returns, including dividends reinvested, are from
December 31, 2011 through December 31, 2021. |
$600 $400
$200 $0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 $100
is now worth $509 S&P 500 $462
2022 Proxy
Statement 7
Table of
Contents
Spotlight on Our Corporate Responsibility
Initiatives
At Comcast,
our most significant environmental, social and governance (“ESG”)
issues are reviewed with our Board of Directors and its committees.
Our Audit Committee oversees cybersecurity and significant business
continuity risks. Our Compensation and Human Capital Committee
reviews programs and strategies with respect to human capital
management and employee engagement and oversees succession
planning. Our Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee
oversees significant environmental and social issues, risks and
trends, including diversity, equity and inclusion (“DE&I”) and
harassment and discrimination matters, as well as privacy and
political and lobbying activities. For more information about our
Board’s oversight of ESG issues, see “Corporate Governance and
Board Matters – Board Structure and Responsibilities – Board and
Committee Strategy, Risk and ESG Oversight
Responsibilities.”
We provide
reports on various ESG issues and initiatives that are of interest
to our stakeholders, including our shareholders, employees,
customers, suppliers, and the communities where we operate, on our
ESG Reporting website at www.cmcsa.com/esg-reporting,
including our Impact Report, EEO-1 Data Report, Sustainability
Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) Report, Task Force on
Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) Report and reporting
on our political and trade association activity. None of the
statements, reports, policies, resources or other content on our
website, or any other websites or reports referenced or discussed
in this proxy statement, are deemed to be part of, or incorporated
by reference into, this proxy statement.
Digital
Equity
As a media
and technology company, we have a unique opportunity to address
digital inequities to help create a more equitable society. Over
the last decade, we have connected a cumulative total of more than
10 million low-income Americans to the internet through our
Internet Essentials program. At the same time, we have sought to
improve access to digital tools and resources, invested in
organizations that help people build digital skills, and partnered
with cable industry peers, schools, governments, nonprofits,
businesses and communities to help bridge the digital
divide.
In 2021, we
continued our efforts to extend our broadband services to
underserved and unserved Americans by:
● |
Promoting and sponsoring
our Internet Essentials program as America’s leading broadband
product for low-income families, including by expanding eligibility
and providing affordable opportunities for school districts and
other organizations to connect students to broadband access at
home. |
|
|
● |
Supporting
and participating in the federal government’s broadband benefits
programs to provide discounted internet service to those in need,
namely the Emergency Broadband Benefit program that launched in May
2021 and its successor, longer-term Affordable Connectivity Program
that launched at the end of 2021. Through these programs, which
enable qualifying low-income customers to apply a financial subsidy
to our broadband services, customers can receive our Internet
Essentials service or our new enhanced Internet Essentials Plus
service with twice the download speed – up to 100 Mbps —
effectively for free. |
|
|
● |
Participating in federal,
state and local programs designed to fund the expansion of
broadband to unserved Americans and extending our broadband network
to new areas where reliable, high-speed internet services had been
unavailable. |
|
|
● |
Continuing
our initiatives established in response to the global pandemic that
provided internet access to those without it, including by offering
60 days of free internet service to eligible new customers, making
our 1.5 million public Wi-Fi hotspots available for free and
creating flexible payment plans that allowed customers and small
businesses to retain their services. |
|
|
● |
Partnering
with non-profit organizations and city leaders to create, through
the end of 2021, more than 1,000 Lift Zones in community centers
nationwide where students in need of internet-equipped spaces for
remote learning can connect to the internet to participate in
distance learning, with an additional 250 planned by the end of
2022. |
8
Table of
Contents
Diversity, Equity
& Inclusion
Our
commitment to DE&I is long-standing. We believe that a diverse,
equitable and inclusive company helps to foster creativity,
innovation and success. We embrace diversity of background,
perspective, culture and experience throughout our business, and we
use our resources – our people, programming and platforms – to work
toward racial equity in areas where we can have a meaningful
impact. Our ongoing efforts and continued progress in this regard
are reviewed and discussed by our Board and/or its committees, our
senior leadership teams and our external DE&I Advisory Council,
which is chaired by our Chief Diversity Officer.
Board of Directors and
Workforce
(Workforce statistics
based on U.S. full-time employees as of year-end 2021)

BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOMINEES 22% of our Board nominees are
women* 11% 11% 11% 33% of our Board nominees are people of color
Black Asian and Paci_c Islander Hispanic and Latino/a/e 2+ Races
Indigenous OVERALL WORKFORCE 36% of our employees were women 18%
15% 0.4% 8% 3% 45% of our employees were people of color VP+ 42% of
our Vice Presidents & above were women 6% 8% 0.2% 8% 2% 24% of
our Vice Presidents & above were people of color DIRECTOR-LEVEL
EMPLOYEES 44% of our Director-level employees were women 7% 8% 0.3%
12% 3% 29% of our Director-level employees were people of color
* |
As of December 31, 2021,
30% of our Board of Directors were women and 50% of our directors
were diverse by gender, race or ethnicity. See “Corporate
Governance and Board Matters – Board of Directors Nominees –
Director Skills, Experience and Diversity” for more
information. |
|
|
● |
Diverse
Talent Development Efforts: We seek to hire, promote
and develop people from a diversity of backgrounds and experiences.
To best serve our unique workforce, we offer both tailored programs
designed for specific audiences to accelerate the development of
prioritized talent, as well as broad-based leadership development
programs designed for employees to lead inclusively and with
cultural competence. Some of our learning experiences include
foundational leadership development programs to help employees
embrace their leadership potential, a year-long networking
experience for women of color and a coaching and online learnings
platform designed for women. |
|
|
● |
DE&I
Education and Training: We offer a variety of
training programs and initiatives focused on creating a more
inclusive workplace culture, including monthly company-wide forums
like our DE&I speaker series designed to inform, inspire
dialogue and foster employee engagement through a curated
experience anchored by external scholars, authors and thought
leaders focusing on a variety of DE&I topics. Additionally, we
offer an enterprise-wide learning catalog with digital eLearning
modules and self-directed curated learning guides, as well as
instructor-led virtual workshops covering inclusion topics such as:
Interrupting Unconscious Bias, Social Identities/Dimensions of
Diversity, Allyship and Neurodiversity, among others. Our various
DE&I newsletters and communications cover essential DE&I
topics such as inclusive leadership behaviors, updates on training
opportunities, employee-driven DE&I events and DE&I data
milestones, to name a few. |
2022 Proxy
Statement 9
Table of
Contents
● |
Employee
Resource Groups (“ERGs”): We support nine ERGs for
Asian Pacific American, Black, People with Disabilities, LGBTQ+,
Hispanic/Latino, Veteran, Young Professional, Women and Indigenous
employees. Our ERGs have 35,000 members in over 200 chapters, and
are voluntary, employee-led organizations dedicated to developing
the careers of our employees, contributing to community service and
building on an inclusive and collaborative workplace and culture.
Each ERG has two executive sponsors, and further support is
provided for ERG projects, programs and events from a $500,000
annual fund. |
Supplier
Diversity and Small Business Support
Our
supplier diversity program is designed to promote, increase and
improve the participation of diverse businesses within our
corporate supply chain — including companies owned by women, people
of color, veterans, people with disabilities and LGBTQ+
individuals. We have been a member of the Billion Dollar Roundtable
since 2015, which recognizes corporations that achieve spending of
at least $1 billion each year with diverse suppliers, and have
spent at least $3 billion each year with diverse suppliers during
the past 5 years. In 2021, we spent over $4.3 billion with diverse
Tier 1 vendors (with direct purchases from approximately 3,250
diverse suppliers) and over $390 million with diverse Tier 2
subcontractors. Through Comcast RISE, a program aimed at small
businesses owned by people of color and women, we have also
supported more than 6,700 small businesses with over $60 million in
grants and in-kind marketing and technology support through
2021.
In 2021, we
also invested $25 million in the Seibert Williams Shank Clear
Vision Impact Fund, a diverse-led and diverse-serving financial
institution that provides direct support to local community
businesses, and $10 million in the Inclusiv Racial Equity and
Resilience Investment Fund, which is aimed at building equity in
credit unions led by and/or serving people of color in an effort to
help increase lending to people of color-owned businesses,
homeowners and consumers by providing financial opportunities to
traditionally underserved and underbanked communities.
Diverse
Programming and Platforms
We strive
to have diverse perspectives that resonate with a wide range of
audiences in our programming at NBCUniversal and in the content we
distribute on our Xfinity platforms. We have created opportunities
in front of and behind the camera, including by offering a wide
range of programs designed to build a diverse pipeline of talent,
including directors, writers, actors, music composers and
journalists.
Examples of
programs we have developed that seek to build additional
opportunities for diverse talent include NBCUniversal’s innovative,
multiplatform journalism training and development program for
students at Historically Black Colleges and Universities and
diverse-serving institutions, as well as a multi-year $3.5 million
scholarship fund for underrepresented students. NBCUniversal also
created a fellowship program awarding diverse documentary
filmmakers grants to support feature-length nonfiction films
highlighting social issues and identities, with seven
groundbreaking filmmakers named in 2021 for the first inaugural
fellowship.
Through our
media platforms, we have worked to amplify diverse voices and
cultures, including through a vast ecosystem of diverse content on
Xfinity, including curated On Demand destinations, as well as
through NBCUniversal’s ‘The More You Know’ series of public service
announcements that have kept audiences informed and educated on
issues that include a campaign to speak out against systemic racism
and speaking up for social justice, equality and equity, to name a
few. For more information on our diverse programming and platforms,
see pages 66-67 of this proxy statement.
Community
Building on
our longstanding commitment to DE&I, in 2020 we developed a
comprehensive, multi-year plan to allocate $100 million in cash and
in-kind support to fight injustice and inequality against any race,
ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation or ability. We
are well on track to fulfill this commitment by the end of 2022.
This is on top of the existing commitments Comcast makes to
thousands of organizations supporting underrepresented communities
nationwide through our social impact programs and the Comcast
NBCUniversal Foundation.
10
Table of
Contents
Human Capital
Management
As a global
media and technology company, we have a wide range of employees,
including management professionals, technicians, engineers, call
center employees, theme park employees and media talent and
production employees. Our human capital management policies,
programs and initiatives are tailored to the specific employee
populations within our businesses and include the
following:
● |
Employee
Engagement: We seek to create an
engaged workforce through proactive listening and constructive
dialogue, including through employee engagement surveys, the nine
ERGs described above and our open reporting environment where
employees can speak up without fear of retaliation. Our Board,
through its committees, also receives periodic reports on our
employee engagement surveys and employee concerns reported through
our Comcast NBCUniversal Listens and Sky Listens
programs. |
|
|
● |
Talent
Development and Succession Planning: We provide a wide variety
of opportunities for professional growth for employees with
in-classroom and online trainings and on-the-job experience,
including as described above in “Diversity, Equity &
Inclusion.” We also offer education tuition assistance to full-time
employees in the United States. Our Board discusses succession
planning for our CEO and the remainder of our senior executive
management team. Throughout the year, our senior executive
management team and other executives throughout our businesses make
presentations to the Board and its committees and interact with our
directors informally outside of regularly scheduled Board meetings,
which provides directors with meaningful insight into our current
pool of talent, what attracts and retains our executives and our
company culture. See “Corporate Governance and Board Matters –
Corporate Governance Practices, Policies and Processes – Succession
Planning” for additional information. |
|
|
● |
Health
and Welfare Benefits: We offer a portfolio of
services and tools to support our employees’ health and well-being.
In 2021, we enhanced benefits related to virtual care, telehealth
options and back-up family care resources and support services and
launched new behavioral health and counseling tools to support
emotional well-being. We provide female and male employees the same
paid parental leave options, including for adoption/surrogacy, and
provide specialized support teams to help manage the first months
of parenthood. In response to the global pandemic, we completed
hundreds of thousands of COVID-19 tests, made physician-directed
COVID-19 screening, testing, vaccine and treatment available at no
out-of-pocket cost to benefit-enrolled employees and their
dependents and hosted onsite vaccine clinics. |
|
|
● |
Financial
Benefits: We seek to attract and
retain employees by providing competitive compensation and benefits
packages within the applicable market. Financial benefits that we
provide include 401(k) retirement plans in the United States with a
company match and other retirement arrangements internationally,
employee stock purchase plans in the United States, United Kingdom,
Ireland and several other European countries where most of our
full-time and part-time employees can purchase our stock at a
discount, and financial literacy training and counseling to support
employees in making their own financial decisions. We also grant
restricted stock units and stock options on an annual basis to a
meaningful portion of our employees, with over 18,000 employees
receiving equity awards in 2021. |
Environmental
Sustainability
In 2021, we
continued to take steps to lessen our environmental footprint and
established a goal to become carbon neutral by 2035 for Scope 1 and
2 emissions across our global operations. Our largest source of
emissions, representing approximately 75% of emissions, is due to
purchased electricity powering our global operations, and as a
result, we are focused on renewable energy procurement as we seek
to reduce our greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. The remaining
emissions come from our owned and operated vehicle fleet and from
generators, cooling systems and purchased steam, cooling and
heating.
Because
purchased electricity accounts for the majority of our Scope 1 and
2 emissions, we have further developed our renewable energy
procurement strategy, signing in 2021 a long-term purchase
agreement for renewable electricity to power approximately 12% of
our current U.S. electricity use beginning in 2024-2025. To provide
transparency and help drive improvement, we report data using the
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol consistent with the Sustainability
Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and Task Force on Climate-Related
Financial Disclosures (TCFD) frameworks.
2022 Proxy
Statement 11
Table of
Contents
Cybersecurity and
Privacy
Protecting
the security and integrity of the information and systems under our
control and safeguarding the privacy of our customer and employee
information has long been a priority at Comcast. In fact,
cybersecurity and privacy risks are among the core enterprise risks
for Board-level oversight identified through our annual Enterprise
Risk Management (“ERM”) assessment.
Our
cybersecurity strategy, policies and practices are overseen by a
Cybersecurity Leadership Council, headed by our Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Legal Officer. Other members include the Chief
Information Security Officers (“CISOs”), Chief Technology Officers
(“CTOs”), Chief Financial Officers and General Counsels of Comcast
Cable, NBCUniversal and Sky, along with our head of Internal Audit.
Our information security programs cover a comprehensive range of
capabilities, including network security, endpoint security,
vulnerability management, antivirus and malware protection,
encryption and access control. We are committed to data protection,
perform annual third-party certifications/audits where appropriate,
and engage an independent firm to perform a cyber capability
maturity assessment every three years. Our Board, including through
our Audit Committee, reviews and discusses our cybersecurity risks,
practices and protections with our CISOs and CTOs at least twice
per year. In addition, our Audit Committee receives regular updates
on our cybersecurity posture throughout the year from our head of
Internal Audit as appropriate.
We also
have a Privacy Council, which includes our Chief Legal Officer and
our Chief Compliance Officer, and the Chief Privacy Officers and
General Counsels of Comcast Cable, NBCUniversal and Sky, that
reviews and assesses privacy risks throughout our businesses and
shares best practices. We respect the privacy rights of individuals
and have implemented tailored privacy compliance programs for our
businesses. Our Board, through our Governance and Corporate
Responsibility Committee, reviews and discusses our privacy
program, processes and priorities with our Chief Privacy
Officers.
Political and Trade
Association Activities
Our code of
conduct, statement on political and trade association activities,
semi-annual political contributions reports and annual tax-exempt
organization disclosures provide information about our political,
lobbying and trade association activities. Our Governance and
Corporate Responsibility Committee is responsible for overseeing
our political, lobbying and trade association activities. In 2021,
we received the leading “Trendsetter” designation from the CPA
Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability
for our transparency and accountability in political and trade
association disclosure, policy and oversight.
Integrity
Our
company’s culture is built on integrity and respect, and we believe
that all of our employees have a responsibility to promote the
highest ethical standards and comply with the law everywhere we
operate. As set forth in our code of conduct, our principles of
business conduct guide us to act with integrity in everything we
do, including a commitment to do what’s right for our employees,
customers, audiences, investors and the communities we serve. We
are committed to creating an environment where employees feel
comfortable asking questions, raising concerns and speaking up
without fear of retaliation, and we believe that we have effective
and well-communicated channels in place for employees to report
concerns.
12
Table of
Contents
Corporate Governance and Board
Matters
Proposal
1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
|
 |
Our Board unanimously
recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the election of each of the
nominees for director.
|
Board of Directors
Nominees
Board Snapshot

* |
See “—Director
Skills, Experience and Diversity” below and Nasdaq Board Diversity
Matrix in Appendix B for additional information. |
** |
Audit Committee Financial
Expert |
Board Nominees Non-independent – 1 I Kenneth J. Bacon, 67 Independent Director
Director Since: November 2002 Committee Membership: Governance and
Corporate Responsibility Committee Madeline S. Bell, 60 Independent
Director Director Since: February 2016 Committee Membership:
Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee Edward D. Breen,
66 Lead Independent Director Director Since: February 2014
Committee Membership: Compensation and Human Capital Committee
Gerald L. Hassell, 70 Independent Director Director Since: May 2008
Committee Membership: Compensation and Human Capital Committee
Jeffrey A. Honickman, 65 Independent Director Director Since:
December 2005 Committee Membership: Audit** and Governance and
Corporate Responsibility Committees Maritza G. Montiel, 70
Independent Director Director Since: June 2018 Committee
Membership: Audit Committee** Asuka Nakahara, 66 Independent
Director Director Since: February 2017 Committee Membership: Audit
Committee David C. Novak, 69 Independent Director Director Since:
December 2016 Committee Membership: Compensation and Human Capital
Committee Brian L. Roberts, 62 Chairman of the Board, President and
CEO Director Since: March 1988 Committee Membership: None
INDEPENDENCE DIVERSITY (GENDER & RACE)* INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR
TENURE Independent: 89% Independent - 8 Non-independent - 1
Diverse: 44% Female - 22% Racial/Ethnic Diversity - 33% Average
Tenure: 10 years < 6 years - 3 >10 years - 3 6-10 years -
2
2022 Proxy
Statement 13
Table of
Contents
Director Skills,
Experience and Diversity
As baseline director
qualifications, our Board seeks, and each of our directors
possesses, key attributes that we deem critical in being a
director, including strong and effective decision-making,
communication and leadership skills; high ethical standards,
integrity and values; and a commitment to representing the
long-term interests of our shareholders. Our Board also strives to
balance the need to have directors with a diversity of skills,
backgrounds, experiences, perspectives and viewpoints, areas of
expertise and knowledge, while including gender and racial and
ethnic representation.
Our Board and each of its
committees assess their effectiveness in this regard as part of
their annual self-assessment which, among other things, evaluates
the overall composition of our Board, including the diversity of
skills and backgrounds of our directors. Our Governance and
Corporate Responsibility Committee focuses on certain specific
director qualifications and skills, including those highlighted
below, to select directors that bring to the Board a diversity of
experience, qualifications, skills, viewpoints and perspectives to
oversee and address the current issues facing our company. Our
Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee considers these
qualifications, including with respect to gender and racial and
ethnic diversity, as it seeks to identify and evaluate potential
new directors. In evaluating current directors for renomination to
the Board or reappointment to Board committees, the Committee also
assesses the director’s performance, as well as the current
challenges and needs of the Board and each committee.
To eliminate even the
appearance of a potential conflict stemming from a directorship of
a family member of Ms. Naomi Bergman on the board of Discovery
following its merger with WarnerMedia, Ms. Bergman is not a nominee
for director at our 2022 annual meeting and her term will end on
the date of our annual meeting in June. We are grateful to Ms.
Bergman for her service on our Board. The size of the Board will be
reduced to nine directors, effective upon the convening of the 2022
annual meeting. Our Governance and Corporate Responsibility
Committee recognizes the value of diversity of backgrounds and
experiences among its membership and is committed to diversity on
our Board as it seeks to identify its next director.
The Governance and
Corporate Responsibility Committee also considers each director’s
ability to dedicate sufficient time, energy and attention to the
fulfillment of his or her duties when it nominates directors each
year. In accordance with our corporate governance guidelines, an
independent director who is a chief executive officer of a public
company may serve on the boards of no more than two other public
companies in addition to our Board, while all other independent
directors may serve on up to five public company boards in total.
The Board also considers directors’ other obligations and
commitments, including leadership positions the director may hold
on other boards, in assessing directors’ ability to serve on our
Board. In renominating directors for election at our 2022 annual
meeting, the Committee and Board have determined that each of our
directors is currently in compliance with our corporate governance
guidelines and has sufficient time, energy and attention to serve
on our Board. For example, as part of this determination, the
Committee and the Board have considered that Mr. Breen serves as
the executive chairman and chief executive officer of DuPont de
Nemours, Inc. and serves as a director of International Flavors
& Fragrances, Inc., which merged with DuPont’s nutrition and
biosciences business in 2021.
14
Table of
Contents
Below are the skills of
our director nominees:
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Current/Former
CEO/President/Executive Officer |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Internet/Video/Wireless
Industry |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Media
Industry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Consumer
Products/Customer-Oriented |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Technology |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Financial/Accounting |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
Risk
Management Oversight |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
International |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
Government
Affairs |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
Human Capital
Management |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Non-Profit/Educational/Philanthropic |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
Gender* |
M |
F |
M |
M |
M |
F |
M |
M |
M |
 |
Race/Ethnicity* |
B |
W |
W |
W |
W |
H |
A |
W |
W |
* |
F – Female; M – Male; A –
Asian; B – Black or African American; H – Hispanic or Latinx; W –
White. |
|
See also
Nasdaq Board Diversity Matrix in Appendix B. |
2022 Proxy
Statement 15
Table of
Contents
Director Nominee
Biographies
Kenneth J.
Bacon
INDEPENDENT
Partner at RailField
Partners
Age:
67
Director since: November 2002
Committees: Governance and Corporate
Responsibility
OTHER
CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
Ally Financial
Inc., Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., Welltower Inc.
FORMER
PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
Forest City
Realty Trust
|
 |
CAREER
HIGHLIGHTS:
● |
Partner, RailField
Partners, a financial advisory and asset management firm, 2012 –
Present |
● |
Executive
Vice President of the multifamily mortgage business, Fannie Mae,
2005 – 2012 |
● |
Interim
Executive Vice President, Housing and Community Development, Fannie
Mae, January 2005 – July 2005 |
● |
Member,
National Multifamily Housing Council |
QUALIFICATIONS:
We believe that Mr.
Bacon’s significant experience in senior executive leadership,
regulatory and government affairs, risk management and the
financial and housing industries renders him qualified to serve as
one of our directors.
Madeline S.
Bell
INDEPENDENT
President and Chief
Executive Officer of The Children’s Hospital of
Philadelphia
Age:
60
Director
since: February 2016
Committees:
Governance and Corporate Responsibility
|
 |
CAREER
HIGHLIGHTS:
● |
President and Chief
Executive Officer, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
(“CHOP”), a top-ranked children’s health system and research
institute with 23,000 employees and over $3.2 billion of annual
revenue, 2015 – Present |
● |
Multiple
Leadership Roles, including Chief Operating Officer, CHOP, 1995 –
2015 |
● |
Began
career as a pediatric nurse in 1983, moved from a variety of
different nursing roles into hospital administration in 1989 and
holds a Master of Science in Organizational Dynamics from the
University of Pennsylvania |
● |
Board
Chair, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia |
● |
Board
Member, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics |
● |
Board
Member, Solutions for Patient Safety |
● |
Executive
Committee Member, Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce and
Member, CEO Council for Growth |
QUALIFICATIONS:
We believe that Ms. Bell’s
experience and leadership of CHOP, including her oversight of risk
management efforts, and her experience in the non-profit community
render her qualified to serve as one of our directors.
16
Table of
Contents
Edward D.
Breen
LEAD INDEPENDENT
DIRECTOR
Chief Executive Officer
and Executive Chairman of DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
Age:
66
Director
since: February 2014
Committees:
Compensation and Human Capital
OTHER CURRENT
PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
DuPont de
Nemours, Inc., International Flavors & Fragrances,
Inc.
FORMER
PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
Corteva, Inc.,
DowDuPont Inc.
|
 |
CAREER
HIGHLIGHTS:
● |
Chief Executive Officer
(since 2020) and Executive Chairman (since 2019), DuPont de
Nemours, Inc., a provider of technology-based materials,
ingredients and solutions |
● |
Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman, DowDuPont and predecessors, 2015 –
2019 |
● |
Chief
Executive Officer, Tyco International Ltd., 2002 – 2012; Chairman
until 2016 |
● |
Previous
President and Chief Operating Officer, Motorola, and multiple
leadership roles, Motorola’s Networks Sector and Motorola’s
Broadband Communications Sector |
● |
Chairman,
President and CEO, General Instrument Corporation, 1997 –
2000 |
● |
Previously
a director of Comcast from 2005 – 2011 |
● |
Chair of
the Board of Trustees, Grove City College |
● |
Member of
the Board of Trustees, Lebanon Valley College |
● |
Member of
the Board of Trustees, The Hun School of Princeton |
QUALIFICATIONS:
We believe that Mr.
Breen’s extensive experience in the technology, equipment supplier
and consumer product sectors, notably as those sectors relate to
the internet, video and wireless industries, including his various
experiences as a president and chief executive officer and in the
oversight of business strategies and risk management efforts,
renders him qualified to serve as one of our directors.
Gerald L.
Hassell
INDEPENDENT
Former Chief Executive
Officer of The Bank of New York Mellon
Age:
70
Director
since: May 2008
Committees:
Compensation and Human Capital
OTHER
CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
MetLife,
Inc.
FORMER
PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
The Bank of
New York Mellon
|
 |
CAREER
HIGHLIGHTS:
● |
Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman, The Bank of New York Mellon, a financial services
corporation, 2011 – 2017 |
● |
President,
The Bank of New York Company, Inc. and The Bank of New York, 1998 –
2011 |
● |
Member of
the Board of Trustees, Duke University |
● |
Member of
the Board of Directors, Duke University Health System |
QUALIFICATIONS:
We believe that Mr.
Hassell’s significant experience and leadership in the financial
industry, including with respect to consumer financial products, as
well as his prior experience as a president and chief executive
officer and in the oversight of risk management efforts, render him
qualified to serve as one of our directors.
2022 Proxy
Statement 17
Table of
Contents
Jeffrey A.
Honickman
INDEPENDENT
Chief Executive Officer
of Pepsi-Cola & National Brand Beverages, Ltd.
Age:
65
Director
since: December 2005
Committees:
Audit and Governance and Corporate Responsibility
|
 |
CAREER
HIGHLIGHTS:
● |
Chief Executive Officer,
Pepsi-Cola & National Brand Beverages, Ltd., a bottling
and distribution company, which includes among its affiliates
Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc. and Canada Dry
bottling companies from New Jersey to Virginia, 1990 –
Present |
● |
Vice
President and Secretary of Antonio Origlio Inc., a beverage
distributor based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which does
business as Origlio Beverages, 1987 – Present |
● |
Member of
the Board of Directors, American Beverage Association |
● |
Member of
Board of Trustees, Barnes Foundation |
● |
Member of
President’s Advisory Council, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center,
Jefferson Health |
QUALIFICATIONS:
We believe that Mr.
Honickman’s significant experience in the wholesale and consumer
products industries, including his experience as a chief executive
officer, renders him qualified to serve as one of our
directors.
Maritza G.
Montiel
INDEPENDENT
Former Deputy Chief
Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of Deloitte LLP
Age:
70
Director
since: June 2018
Committees:
Audit
OTHER CURRENT
PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
AptarGroup,
Inc., McCormick & Company, Incorporated, Royal Caribbean
Group
|
 |
CAREER
HIGHLIGHTS:
● |
Deputy Chief Executive
Officer and Vice Chairman, Deloitte LLP, 2011 – 2014 |
● |
Numerous senior management
roles at Deloitte, including: |
|
● |
Managing Partner
(Leadership Development and Succession, Deloitte University), 2009
– 2011 |
|
● |
Regional
Managing Partner, 2001 – 2009 |
● |
Advisory Partner for many
public company clients where Deloitte was the principal
auditor |
● |
Member of Deloitte’s U.S.
and Global Board of Directors |
● |
Member of the Board of
Trustees, Baptist Health South Florida |
QUALIFICATIONS:
We believe that Ms.
Montiel’s extensive experience and leadership in the accounting
profession, including her experience as the former Deputy Chief
Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of Deloitte and in the
oversight of risk and compliance efforts, render her qualified to
serve as one of our directors.
18
Table of
Contents
Asuka
Nakahara
INDEPENDENT
Partner at Triton
Atlantic Partners
Age:
66
Director
since: February 2017
Committees:
Audit
OTHER
CURRENT PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS:
CBRE Global
Real Estate Income Fund
|
 |
CAREER
HIGHLIGHTS:
● |
Partner, Triton Atlantic
Partners, a real estate advisory firm and investment vehicle that
he co-founded, 2009 – Present |
● |
Associate
Director, Zell-Lurie Real Estate Center, and Practice Professor,
Real Estate Department, Wharton School of the University of
Pennsylvania, 1999 – Present |
● |
Trammell
Crow Company, various leadership roles including Chief Financial
Officer (overseeing finance, capital markets, mergers and
acquisitions, marketing, Trammell Crow University, human resources
and other new business initiatives), 1980 – 1999 |
QUALIFICATIONS:
We believe that Mr.
Nakahara’s extensive knowledge of real estate and general advisory
matters, including his leadership and academic experiences, as well
as his prior experience as a chief financial officer, render him
qualified to serve as one of our directors.
David C.
Novak
INDEPENDENT
Founder of David Novak
Leadership, Inc.
Age:
69
Director
since: December 2016
Committees:
Compensation and Human Capital
|
 |
CAREER
HIGHLIGHTS:
● |
Founder of David Novak
Leadership, Inc., which provides online leadership training to
transform managers into confident, capable, engaging leaders, 2020
– Present |
● |
Executive
Chairman of the Board, YUM! Brands, Inc., 2015 – 2016 |
● |
Chairman
of the Board, YUM! Brands, Inc., 2001 – 2014 |
● |
Chief
Executive Officer, YUM! Brands, Inc., 2000 – 2014 |
● |
Board
Member, Lift-a-Life Novak Family Foundation |
● |
Author of
O GREAT ONE! A little Story About the Awesome Power of
Recognition, Taking People With You: The Only Way to Achieve
Big Things and co-author of Take Charge of You,
dedicated to developing leaders at every stage of life |
QUALIFICATIONS:
We believe that Mr.
Novak’s extensive knowledge of customer service-oriented business
practices and talent management, as well as his prior experience as
a chief executive officer and chairman, render him qualified to
serve as one of our directors.
2022 Proxy
Statement 19
Table of
Contents
Brian L.
Roberts
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Comcast
Age:
62
Director
since: March 1988
Committees:
None
|
 |
CAREER
HIGHLIGHTS:
● |
Chairman of the Board,
Comcast, 2004 – Present |
● |
Chief
Executive Officer, Comcast, 2002 – Present |
● |
President,
Comcast, 1990 – Present |
● |
Director
Emeritus, CableLabs, the cable industry’s research and development
consortium |
As of December 31, 2021,
Mr. Roberts, through his ownership of our Class B common stock, had
sole voting power over 33 1/3% of the combined voting power of our
two classes of voting common stock.
QUALIFICATIONS:
We believe that Mr.
Roberts’ extensive experience and leadership in the internet,
video, phone, media and entertainment and wireless industries,
including as our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
and in the oversight of business strategies and risk management
efforts, render him qualified to serve as one of our
directors.
Independence
Determinations
Our Board has determined
that each of our nine nonemployee directors (including Ms. Bergman,
who is not a nominee for director at our 2022 annual meeting) is
independent in accordance with the director independence definition
specified in our corporate governance guidelines, which are posted
under “Corporate Governance” in the Investors section of our
website at www.cmcsa.com, and in
accordance with applicable Nasdaq rules. In making its independence
determinations, our Board considered transactions and relationships
between each director or any member of his or her immediate family
and us, including those reported under “Related Party Transactions
Policy and Certain Transactions” below. The Board also considered
that in the ordinary course of business we have, during the current
year and the past three fiscal years, sold products and services
to, purchased products and services from, and/or made charitable
donations (including by certain of our executive officers) to
companies and organizations at which certain of our directors are
currently an executive officer or a significant shareholder. In
each case, the amount paid or donated to or received from these
companies and organizations each year was below 1% of the recipient
company’s or organization’s total consolidated gross revenues,
which is far below the 5% limit prescribed by Nasdaq
rules.
Retirement Age, Director
Tenure and Director Emeritus Program
Our corporate governance
guidelines require that our independent directors not stand for
re-election to the Board after reaching the age of 72. We believe
that our retirement policy and natural turnover achieve the
appropriate balance between maintaining longer-term directors with
deep institutional knowledge and refreshing the Board with new
directors and different areas of expertise and knowledge, while
including gender and racial and ethnic representation.
Our Board considers
director tenure in connection with its independence determinations,
even though neither our corporate governance guidelines nor Nasdaq
or SEC rules deem a long-tenured director not independent.
Following the annual meeting of shareholders, if all director
nominees are elected to serve as our directors, the average tenure
of our independent directors will be 10 years.
Our Board has created a
director emeritus program to avail itself of the counsel of
retiring directors who have made and can continue to make a unique
contribution to the deliberations of the Board. A director emeritus
may provide advisory services as requested from time to time and
may be invited to attend meetings of the Board, but may not vote,
be counted for quorum purposes or have any of the duties or
obligations imposed on our directors or officers under applicable
law or otherwise be considered a director. Sheldon M. Bonovitz was
designated as a director emeritus following our 2020 annual
meeting.
20
Table of
Contents
Director
Nominations
Identifying
and Evaluating Director Nominees
Our Governance and
Corporate Responsibility Committee will consider director
candidates nominated or recommended by shareholders and will
evaluate any such candidates in a similar manner as any other
candidates. In identifying and evaluating candidates, whether
recommended by the Committee or by shareholders, the Committee will
consider an individual’s professional knowledge, business,
financial and management expertise, industry knowledge,
entrepreneurial background and experience, as well as applicable
independence requirements. The Committee also gives significant
consideration to the current composition and diversity of our
Board, including with respect to the skills set forth above, as
well as age, backgrounds, experiences, perspectives, viewpoints and
gender and racial and ethnic representation.
Shareholder
Nominees
To submit a nomination for
the election of directors, shareholders must provide a written
notice in accordance with Section 3.10 of our by-laws. For the
election of directors at the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders,
if such meeting is called for a date between May 2, 2023 and July
1, 2023, we must receive written notice at the mailing address
given on page 82 on or after February 1, 2023 and no later than
March 3, 2023. If we call the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders
for any other date, we must receive written notice no later than
the close of business on the tenth day following the day we mailed
notice of, or announced publicly, the date of the meeting,
whichever occurs first. In addition to satisfying the deadlines in
the advance notice provisions of our by-laws, a shareholder who
intends to solicit proxies in support of nominees submitted under
these advance notice provisions must provide the notice required
under Rule 14a-19 no later than April 2, 2023.
In addition, in accordance
with Section 3.11 of our by-laws, a shareholder or group of up to
20 shareholders owning at least 3% of the aggregate number of our
outstanding shares of common stock continuously for at least three
years may nominate and include in our proxy materials director
nominees constituting up to the greater of 20% of our Board or two
directors, provided the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) satisfy the
requirements in our by-laws. Written notice of proxy access
director nominees for the election of directors at the 2023 annual
meeting of shareholders, if such meeting is called for a date
between May 2, 2023 and July 1, 2023, must be received at the
mailing address given on page 82 on or after November 23, 2022 and
no later than December 23, 2022. If such meeting is called for any
other date, we must receive written notice no later than the close
of business on the later of the date that is 180 days prior to such
meeting or the tenth day following the date the meeting is first
publicly announced or disclosed.
Shareholders can obtain a
copy of our by-laws by writing to Thomas J. Reid, Secretary,
Comcast Corporation, at the mailing address given on page 82. A
copy of our by-laws is filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 and
is posted on our website under “Corporate Governance” in the
Investors section of our website at www.cmcsa.com.
Board Structure and
Responsibilities
Board Leadership
Structure
Our Board believes that we
and our shareholders are best served by maintaining the flexibility
for the Board to split or combine the offices of Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer based upon a contemporaneous determination of
what is in the best interests of our company at a given point in
time. To that end, our Board regularly reviews our Board leadership
structure.
Our Board believes that we
and our shareholders are currently best served by having Mr.
Roberts serve as both our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr.
Roberts is a strong and effective leader, at both the company and
Board levels, who provides critical leadership in carrying out our
strategic initiatives and confronting our challenges. Mr. Roberts
serves as an effective bridge between the Board and management,
facilitating strong collaboration and encouraging open lines of
communication with the Board.
Our independent directors
are led by our Lead Independent Director, who ensures a strong,
independent and active Board by promoting effective communication
and consideration of matters presenting significant risks to the
Company through his role in developing the Board’s meeting agendas,
advising committee chairs and facilitating communications between
independent directors and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
Our independent directors provide guidance and oversight of senior
management and regularly meet without management as part of Board
and committee meetings to review, among
2022 Proxy
Statement 21
Table of
Contents
other things, our
strategy, performance, management effectiveness and succession
planning. As part of our annual Board assessment process, our
independent directors also provide input on key business and
director educational topics for the following year’s Board and
committee meeting agendas.
Edward D.
Breen
LEAD INDEPENDENT
DIRECTOR
|
In accordance with our
corporate governance guidelines, our Board has a strong Lead
Independent Director position, currently filled by Mr. Breen. The
Lead Independent Director:
● |
Chairs meetings of the
Board at which the Chairman is not present. |
● |
Facilitates communication
between the Chairman and the independent directors and encourages
director participation by fostering an environment of open dialogue
and constructive feedback among independent directors. |
● |
Communicates periodically
as necessary between Board meetings and executive sessions with our
independent directors, following discussions with management and
otherwise on topics of importance to our independent
directors. |
● |
Consults
with our independent directors concerning the need for an executive
session in connection with each regularly scheduled Board
meeting. |
● |
Is authorized
to schedule meetings of the independent directors, including
executive sessions of the independent directors. |
● |
Consults, reviews and has
the opportunity to provide input on meeting agendas and meeting
schedules for the Board. |
● |
With the Compensation and
Human Capital Committee, organizes the annual Board evaluation of
the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and senior
management. |
● |
With the Governance and
Corporate Responsibility Committee, reviews and approves the
process for the annual self-assessment of our Board and its
committees. |
● |
Represents independent
directors in communications with external constituencies, as
appropriate. |
The role of Lead
Independent Director is filled by an independent director
recommended by the Governance and Corporate Responsibility
Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors, and
appointed by the Board annually.
In addition to the Lead
Independent Director position, our Board believes that Board
independence and oversight of management are effectively maintained
through the Board’s composition, where 89% of our director nominees
are independent, and through our Audit, Compensation and Human
Capital and Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committees,
which are composed entirely of independent directors. Moreover,
having one individual perform the roles of Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer is not restricted or prohibited by current laws
or regulations, and all of our directors, including our Chairman,
are bound by fiduciary obligations under law to act in a manner
that they believe to be in the best interests of our
company.
Board Meetings and
Attendance
Our Board and various
committees of the Board meet throughout the year. During 2021,
there were five meetings of our Board and a total of 21 committee
meetings. Each director attended more than 75% of the aggregate
number of Board meetings and the number of meetings held by all of
the committees on which he or she served.
We require our directors
to participate in the annual meeting of shareholders, barring
unusual circumstances. Each director then in office participated in
the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders.
Our independent directors
have the opportunity to meet separately in executive session
following each regularly scheduled Board and committee meeting and,
under our corporate governance guidelines, are required to meet in
executive session at least two times each year. In 2021, executive
sessions were held at each regularly scheduled Board meeting, and
most regularly scheduled committee meetings.
22
Table of
Contents
Committees of Our
Board
Our Board has three
standing committees: Audit, Compensation and Human Capital, and
Governance and Corporate Responsibility. All of these committees
are composed entirely of independent directors under applicable
Nasdaq and SEC requirements.
The Board makes committee
and committee chair assignments annually at its meeting immediately
preceding the annual meeting of shareholders, although further
changes may be made from time to time as deemed appropriate by the
Board.
Each committee has a
Board-approved charter, which is reviewed annually by the
respective committee, with the Governance and Corporate
Responsibility Committee annually reviewing all charters and our
corporate governance guidelines. Each committee has the authority
to retain independent advisors to assist it in carrying out its
responsibilities. Committee charters are posted under “Corporate
Governance” in the Investors section of our website at www.cmcsa.com.
Audit
Committee
Members
Jeffrey A. Honickman
(Chair)
Naomi G.
Bergman*
Maritza G. Montiel
Asuka Nakahara
Meetings
in 2021: 10
|
 |
KEY
RESPONSIBILITIES
● |
Reviews the quality and
integrity of our financial statements. |
● |
Reviews the financial
statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” in our Forms 10-Q and 10-K and
our quarterly earnings press releases. |
● |
Monitors our internal
control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and
procedures. |
● |
Reviews the performance
and responsibilities of our internal audit function and
activities. |
● |
Appoints and evaluates the
qualification, performance and independence of our independent
auditors. |
● |
Reviews financial risk
assessment and management, cybersecurity and significant business
continuity risks. |
● |
Reviews process with
respect to our ERM assessment. |
● |
Reviews risks facing our
company as disclosed in “Risk Factors” in our Form
10-K. |
● |
Reports
its discussions to the full Board for consideration and action when
appropriate. |
Each member of our Audit
Committee is financially literate for audit committee purposes, and
our Board has concluded that Jeffrey A. Honickman and Maritza G.
Montiel qualify as audit committee financial experts.
The Audit
Committee Report is included on page 59.
* |
Ms. Bergman is not a
nominee for director at our 2022 annual meeting. |
2022 Proxy
Statement 23
Table of
Contents
Compensation and Human
Capital Committee
Members
Edward D. Breen
(Chair)
Gerald L.
Hassell
David C. Novak
Meetings
in 2021: 6
|
 |
KEY
RESPONSIBILITIES
● |
Oversees and sets
compensation for our senior executives. |
● |
Performs an annual review
of our compensation philosophy, executive compensation programs and
the performance of senior executives, including our named executive
officers (“NEOs”). |
● |
Evaluates annually whether
there are any risks associated with our executive compensation
program. |
● |
Oversees succession
planning for senior management. |
● |
Reviews compensation and
benefit plans and policies generally, including with respect to
compensation of our senior executives and other
employees. |
● |
Reviews programs and
strategies with respect to human capital management, including with
respect to talent recruitment, development and retention, employee
engagement and workforce composition. |
● |
Reports
its discussions to the full Board for consideration and action when
appropriate. |
Each member of our
Compensation and Human Capital Committee qualifies as a
“non-employee director” under Rule 16b-3 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
The
Compensation and Human Capital Committee Report is included on page
46.
Governance
and Corporate Responsibility Committee
Members
Kenneth J. Bacon
(Chair)
Madeline S.
Bell
Jeffrey A. Honickman
Meetings
in 2021: 5
|
 |
KEY
RESPONSIBILITIES
● |
Provides general oversight
of corporate governance. |
● |
Oversees culture of
compliance and ethical business conduct, including compliance
program. |
● |
Reviews significant legal
and regulatory compliance risks, such as privacy. |
● |
Oversees, monitors and
receives reports on workplace harassment and discrimination
matters. |
● |
Reviews and assesses our
corporate social responsibility report and significant
environmental and social issues, risks and trends, including by
receiving periodic reports on DE&I initiatives and
matters. |
● |
Oversees our approach to
political and lobbying activities, including by receiving periodic
reports on our political contributions, lobbying and trade
association activities. |
● |
Reports
its discussions to the full Board for consideration and action when
appropriate. |
24
Table of
Contents
Board
and Committee Strategy, Risk and Environmental, Social and
Governance (“ESG”) Oversight Responsibilities
Our Board and its
committees provide guidance to and oversight of management with
respect to our business strategy throughout the year. Various
elements of strategy are discussed at every Board meeting, and our
management is charged with executing the business strategy and
updating the Board on progress and execution throughout the
year.
While active risk
management is primarily the responsibility of our management, our
Board understands the significant risks facing our company,
including those related to relevant ESG issues, and exercises, as a
whole and through its committees, an appropriate degree of risk
oversight. Our management, with involvement and input from our
Board, performs a companywide enterprise risk management (“ERM”)
assessment to identify key risks and to manage and mitigate the
significant strategic, operational and legal risk areas for our
company. Our executive management team has the overall
responsibility for, and oversight of, this process, and an ERM
steering committee composed of legal, financial and business
executives manages the process, with one or more senior business
executives then monitoring and managing each of the identified
risks. Regular business presentations and discussions throughout
the year at the Board or its committees highlight significant
relevant risks and exposures, including those listed below as core
enterprise risks identified through our ERM process.
Our Board and its
committees exercise their respective roles in strategy, risk
oversight and oversight of significant ESG matters in a variety of
ways, as set forth below. Certain matters may be addressed by both
the Board and its committees. Our Board oversees the core
enterprise risks identified through our ERM process for Board-level
oversight (either as a whole or as delegated to its committees),
and each Board committee addresses the risks that fall within its
area of responsibility. Each committee also reports its discussions
to the full Board for consideration and action when
appropriate.
|
|
Board of
Directors |
|
|
Oversight of Core
Enterprise Risks |
|
|
Competitive
Risks |
Reputational
Risks |
Succession
Planning |
Capital
Allocation |
Cybersecurity &
Privacy |
Legal &
Regulatory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Audit
Committee |
|
Compensation &
Human
Capital
Committee |
|
Governance &
Corporate
Responsibility
Committee |
Oversight of ERM assessment process, as
well as:
● Financial
reporting and accounting matters
● Internal
controls
● Financial
risks
● Cybersecurity and
business continuity
|
|
Oversight of:
● Executive
compensation program
● Nonemployee
director compensation
● Human
capital management, including talent recruitment, development and
retention, employee engagement and workforce composition
|
|
Oversight of:
● Corporate
governance and compliance
● Legal
and regulatory matters, including privacy
● Harassment and
discrimination matters
● DE&I
matters
● Political and
lobbying activities
● Annual
corporate responsibility reporting, which includes significant
environmental and social issues, risks and trends
|
2022
Proxy Statement 25
Table of
Contents
Corporate Governance
Practices, Policies and Processes
Corporate
Governance Highlights
As described in
more detail elsewhere in this proxy statement, below are highlights
of our corporate governance structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board
Independence/Composition |
|
Corporate
Governance |
|
|
● Strong Lead
Independent Director, with Defined Role and Responsibilities
● 89% of Director Nominees are
Independent
● Director Tenure Considered in
Annual Board Director Independence Determinations
● All Members of Board
Committees are Independent
● Opportunity for Executive
Sessions at Every Board and Committee Meeting
● 44% of Director Nominees are
Diverse by Gender or Race
● 33% Racial/Ethnic
Diversity
● 22% Female
● Compensation and Human Capital
Committee Directly Retains Independent Compensation Consultant
|
|
● 3 New Independent
Directors within Past 6 Years
● Average Tenure of Independent
Directors is 10 Years
● Mandatory Independent Director
Retirement at 72
● Director “Overboarding”
Policy
● Annual Board Assessment
Process
● Robust Shareholder Engagement
Program
● Met with over 40 investors
owning over 50% of Class A common stock on Governance, Compensation
and other ESG matters
● Annual Director Elections
● Proxy Access By-Law
● Recoupment (“Clawback”) Policy
for Executive Compensation
● No Automatic Acceleration of
Vesting in Connection with a Change in Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board
Performance |
|
Stock
Ownership Requirements |
|
|
● Annual Board and
Committee Evaluations
● Board/Committee Oversight of
Strategy, Significant Company Risks and ESG Matters
● Annual Board and Compensation
and Human Capital Committee Discussion of Succession Planning for
CEO and Senior Executives
● Director Education on Key
Company Topics and Issues, Including as Requested by Independent
Directors
|
|
● NEOs and
Nonemployee Directors Subject to and in Compliance with Robust
Stock Ownership Requirements
● CEO = 10x Salary
● Other NEOs = 3x Salary
● Nonemployee Directors = 5x
Annual Cash Retainer
● No Dividend Equivalents Paid
on Unearned Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) or on Any Stock
Options
● Prohibition on Hedging and
Pledging Comcast Stock
|
|
26
Table of
Contents
Succession
Planning
Ensuring that we
have the appropriate senior management talent to successfully
pursue our strategies is one of the Board’s primary
responsibilities. To this end, the Board discusses succession
planning for our CEO and the remainder of our senior executive
management team in private sessions at most of its regularly
scheduled meetings. To help fulfill the Board’s responsibility, our
Compensation and Human Capital Committee is required, pursuant to
our corporate governance guidelines, to ensure that we have in
place appropriate planning to address CEO succession both in the
ordinary course of business and in emergency situations. Our CEO
succession planning includes criteria that reflect our business
strategies, such as identifying and developing internal candidates.
Our corporate governance guidelines also require that our
Compensation and Human Capital Committee ensures that we have
appropriate succession planning for the remainder of our senior
executive management team, including our NEOs. Each year, our Board
and Compensation and Human Capital Committee formally discuss
succession planning for our senior executive management team and
their respective direct reports.
Board
and Committee Evaluations
Every year, our
Board and each of its committees perform a self-assessment to
evaluate their effectiveness. As part of these assessments, each
director completes a detailed questionnaire for the Board and any
committees on which he or she serves, addressing topics such as
Board structure and composition, Board responsibilities, Board
meetings and materials, Board and management interactions and
ethics and compliance. The questionnaire seeks both
quantitative-based responses and general comments. The Governance
and Corporate Responsibility Committee reviews and approves the
process and the questionnaires to be used, with outside counsel
also reviewing the questionnaires. The results of the assessments
are compiled anonymously and are reviewed and discussed with the
Board and the Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee (as
it relates to both the Board and all committees), each committee
(as it relates to such committee) and, as appropriate, any
individual director. In addition to the formal evaluation process,
directors provide feedback on the Board’s and its committees’
performance on an ongoing basis. The Governance and Corporate
Responsibility Committee develops action plans for items that may
require follow-up, and it also coordinates recommendations for key
business and director educational topics for the following year’s
Board and committee meeting agendas.
Corporate
Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct
Our Board has
adopted corporate governance guidelines that address items such as
the standards, qualifications and responsibilities of our directors
and director candidates and corporate governance policies and
standards applicable to us in general. We also have a code of
conduct that applies to all of our employees, including our
executive officers, and our directors. Both the guidelines and the
code of conduct applicable to our executive officers and directors
are posted under “Corporate Governance” in the Investors section of
our website at www.cmcsa.com. We will disclose
under “Corporate Governance” in the Investors section of our
website any amendments to, or any waivers under, the code of
conduct that are required to be disclosed by the rules of the SEC
or Nasdaq.
2022
Proxy Statement 27
Table of
Contents
Shareholder
Engagement
We have an
active, broad-based and year-round investor relations outreach
program to solicit input and to communicate with shareholders on a
variety of topics. In addition to our regular investor relations
program that reviews our business and strategy with buy-side
investors and securities analysts, we engage with investors on
various corporate governance, compensation and other environmental
and social (“E&S”) topics. This dialogue provides an
opportunity to discuss governance matters generally, including our
directors’ skills and tenure, Board oversight roles and
responsibilities, E&S initiatives and executive
compensation.
The key elements
of our investor relations outreach program are below:

•
Focused, one-on-one meetings with investors, senior management and,
at times, independent directors, on a range of governance,
compensation and E&S matters, as well as general business and
strategy updates • Meetings with proxy advisory firms • Live
webcasts of quarterly earnings presentations • Live webcasts of
CEO, CFO and other business leaders speaking at investor
conferences • Met with over 350 investors on strategy and business
results through a combination of group meetings and one-on-one
meetings • Discussions with most proponents of shareholder
proposals before proxy statement filed • Meetings with investors to
discuss annual meeting proposals • Review and consider shareholder
voting results Governance and E&S Engagements Annual Meeting
Round Engagement Investor Relations Year- Investor Feedback
Outcomes from • Board and/or its committees review and consider
annual meeting voting results and investor feedback received from
engagements • As a result of these meetings, over the past year: •
Implemented multiple changes to our executive compensation program
(see pages 31-32) • Provided additional E&S disclosures in
2021, available on our ESG Reporting website
www.cmcsa.com/esg-reporting, including: • supplementing our
current DE&I reporting with information from EEO-1 reports •
increasing information on trade association lobbying • reporting
for the first time consistent with both SASB and TCFD
frameworks
|
Over past year, met with over 40 investors owning over 50% of Class
A common stock on governance, compensation and E&S
matters. |
Our Board has
established a process for shareholders and other interested parties
to communicate with its members. Correspondence may be addressed to
the Board, the Lead Independent Director, any other particular
director, any committee of the Board or any other group of
directors, in care of Thomas J. Reid, Secretary, Comcast
Corporation, at the mailing address provided on page 82 or the
following e-mail address: audit_committee_chair@comcast.com. The
Secretary, or his designee, promptly reviews all such
correspondence and, as appropriate, forwards it to the Board or
other addressee based on the subject matter of the correspondence.
Any such correspondence relating to accounting, internal accounting
controls or auditing matters is handled in accordance with
procedures established by the Audit Committee.
28
Table of
Contents
Executive Compensation
Proposal 2: ADVISORY
VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The following proposal gives our shareholders the opportunity to
cast a non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of
our NEOs. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of
compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our NEOs and
our compensation philosophy, policies and practices, as disclosed
below.
We encourage
shareholders to review detailed information on our executive
compensation program and the 2021 compensation of our NEOs as set
forth in “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and
Analysis,” starting below. Shareholders are being asked to vote
“FOR” the adoption of the following resolution:
“RESOLVED,
that the compensation paid to Comcast Corporation’s named executive
officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K,
including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation
tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”
While
we intend to carefully consider the voting results of this
proposal, this vote is advisory in nature, and, therefore, is not
binding on us or our Board. Our Board and Compensation and Human
Capital Committee value the opinions of all of our shareholders and
will consider the outcome of this vote when making future
compensation decisions for our NEOs. We currently conduct advisory
votes to approve the compensation paid to our NEOs on an annual
basis.
|
 |
Our Board unanimously
recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” approval of the compensation of our
named executive officers. |
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
This discussion
and analysis describes our executive compensation philosophy,
process, plans and practices and gives the context for
understanding and evaluating more specific compensation information
in the tables and related disclosures that follow.
Executive
Overview
Overall Performance
Mr. Roberts and
our senior leadership team have successfully led our company over
the past two years as the world continued to navigate ongoing
challenges from the pandemic, achieving strong operating and
financial results and underscoring the strength and resilience of
our business. In the face of unique and ongoing challenges posed by
the pandemic, we pivoted quickly, executed well and came together
globally to support employees, customers, guests and
communities.
Our relentless
focus on innovation and execution, balanced with financial
discipline, enabled us in 2021 to deliver strong performance across
our businesses and invest for the future, while increasing our
return of capital to shareholders. As described above in “About
Comcast—2021 Performance Overview,” our 2021 consolidated operating
and financial results were strong, with contributions from across
our company, underscoring our business resilience, strategic
decision-making and capital allocation priorities, all driven with
a view toward growth and creating long-term value. The strength of
our company’s balance sheet both supported our business priorities
and investments and enabled us to return more capital to
shareholders sooner than anticipated as our debt leverage ratios
returned to target levels following the Sky acquisition over three
years ago.
Comcast Cable
continued its strong financial and operating performance in 2021.
The significant investments we have made in our technology and
network over the years to stay ahead of demand and to maintain
speed and reliability continued to differentiate our broadband
experience, leading to 1.3 million net new broadband customers in
2021 and bringing total broadband subscribers to 31.9 million at
year end.
The impact of the
global pandemic continued to have some negative impacts on
NBCUniversal and Sky, yet their leadership teams led strong
recoveries, posting results that surpassed our expectations leading
into 2021. At NBCUniversal, our theme parks performed exceptionally
well, reopening safely with strong attendance and financial
results, while also adding new attractions and opening Universal
Beijing Resort. Peacock, our streaming service that launched in
mid-2020, showed significant growth in monthly active accounts and
revenue relative to 2020. In 2021, programming and production
levels normalized at both NBCUniversal and Sky, and we continue to
monetize our intellectual property through creative new options for
content licensing windows and distribution.
2022
Proxy Statement 29
Table of
Contents
Mr. Roberts and
our senior leadership team executed exceptionally well, working
together across our complementary, high-performing business units
to continue to accelerate convergence in media and technology. In
2021, as we sought to expand the reach of our proprietary global
technology platform and addressable customer base, we launched Sky
Glass in the United Kingdom and XClass TV in the United States.
Both of these products are built upon our existing investments
across our company in X1, Flex and Sky Q.
Our Board credits
our NEOs for their successful leadership in 2021 – they not only
delivered for our shareholders, but also continued to support our
stakeholders, including our employees, customers, suppliers and the
communities where we operate. From our dedication to bridging the
digital divide by providing more people with the tools and
resources they need to succeed in a digital society, to our ongoing
efforts and continued progress in DE&I and community impact, to
taking further steps to lessen our environmental footprint by
setting a goal to be carbon neutral by 2035 for Scope 1 and 2
emissions across our global operations, our senior leadership team
continued to lead by example and reinforce our company’s commitment
to doing what’s right while underscoring our commitment to act with
integrity. See “Spotlight on our Corporate Responsibility
Initiatives” for additional information.
2021
Compensation Overview
In making
compensation decisions for 2021, the Compensation and Human Capital
Committee considered, among other things, the exceptional
leadership and performance of our NEOs in successfully managing our
company for the long-term. The Compensation and Human Capital
Committee also sought to ensure that the compensation program for
our NEOs aligns compensation with shareholders’ interests and our
long-term strategic goals, delivers pay for performance and
reflects shareholder input and prevailing market pay practices.
Below is a brief
overview of key executive compensation decisions that were made in
respect of 2021 compensation, all of which are discussed in
additional detail under “Our Approach to Compensation” and
“Compensation Decisions” below. Many of these decisions reflect the
significant changes to our executive compensation program design
and structure as described in more detail immediately below in
“Shareholder Feedback on Executive Compensation and
Compensation-Related Changes.”
● |
Dana Strong was appointed the CEO of Sky and
became an NEO for the first time in 2021. Ms. Strong previously was
President of Consumer Services for Comcast Cable’s residential
businesses in the United States. |
|
|
● |
The Compensation and Human Capital Committee did not increase
the base salaries of our NEOs, other than those of Mr. Watson and
Ms. Strong. In November 2021, the Committee and Mr. Roberts agreed
to reduce his annual base salary to $2.5 million. |
|
|
● |
Annual cash bonus payouts reflected the strong performance of
our company in 2021, paying out at ranges between 125% and
133%. |
|
|
● |
Performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”) granted in
2021 have a cumulative three-year performance period and are earned
based on the achievement of financial goals that emphasize capital
efficiency, sustained earnings growth and creation of shareholder
value relative to market performance. |
|
|
● |
Eliminated above-market interest earnings on deferred
compensation for NEOs and directors. |
As a result of
these changes, the vast majority of our NEOs’ compensation is
performance-based, strongly aligning the NEOs’ compensation with
our shareholders’ interests.
2021
CEO COMPENSATION MIX |
|
2021
AVERAGE NEO COMPENSATION MIX
(EXCLUDING CEO) |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
25% Annual Cash Bonus 25% Stock Options 40% PSUs 10% Salary 11%
Salary <1% Other 43% Annual Cash 18% Bonus Stock Options 28%
PSUs <1% Other 90% Total Performance- Based 89% Total
Performance- Based
30
Table of
Contents
Shareholder
Feedback on Executive Compensation and Compensation-Related
Changes
The Compensation
and Human Capital Committee carefully considered the results of our
2021 annual meeting, where our shareholders approved the 2020
compensation of our NEOs on an advisory basis by 88% of the votes
cast. It discussed our executive compensation program and our
voting results with Korn Ferry, its independent compensation
consultant.
The Compensation
and Human Capital Committee also considered feedback on our
compensation program received from shareholders through our
corporate governance roadshows, as well as feedback from two proxy
advisory firms, and has taken significant steps over the past two
years to address this feedback. (See “Shareholder Engagement” on
page 28 for additional details on our shareholder engagement
program.)
|
WHAT WE HAVE HEARD |
|
|
|
WHAT WE HAVE DONE |
|
LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION DESIGN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consider
having a multi-year performance period for PSUs |
|
|
|
PSUs
granted in 2021 have a 3-year cumulative performance period, with
performance goals determined at the beginning of the 3-year period
and measured at the end of the three-year period; previously PSUs
had five individual 1-year performance periods |
|
Consider
using a relative performance metric
Consider incenting NEOs
with a capital allocation performance metric
Consider a PSU
performance metric not also used in the annual cash bonus
program
|
|
|
|
PSUs
granted in 2021 have two relative performance metrics relating to
Adjusted Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) growth and TSR and include an
absolute return on adjusted invested capital (“ROIC”) performance
metric; none of these metrics are used in our annual cash
bonus program
Specifically:
● PSUs earned based
on achievement of two primary performance metrics, each weighted
50%:
● an absolute ROIC
metric (calculated for each year during the three-year period and
averaged to yield an average ROIC for the cumulative three-year
period); and
● relative Adjusted
EPS growth to the S&P 100 over the three-year period
● Attainment of
primary performance metrics is subject to a relative TSR modifier,
interpolated for performance between the bottom and top quartiles
(25th – 75th percentile), with no positive
modifier applied if TSR is negative over the performance
period
|
|
ANNUAL
CASH BONUS |
|
Consider
aligning relative weighting of quantitative financial performance
metrics closer to market |
|
|
|
Quantitative
financial metrics increased to 70% in 2021 (from 50% in 2020) of
the target bonus to closer align with market practice; revenue,
Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow remain the metrics
used |
|
Consider
improving the transparency and objectivity of non-financial
performance metrics |
|
|
|
15% of
the target bonus in 2021 is based on strategic operating
performance goals such as customer experience, product churn,
Peacock user growth, Flex rollout, Xfinity Mobile performance and
organizational collaboration
15% of the
target bonus in 2021 is based on a qualitative assessment of our
progress on stakeholder and sustainability initiatives such as
continued leadership in addressing the “digital divide,” further
progress on our DE&I and environmental sustainability
initiatives, and further enhancing our strong culture of integrity
and respect
|
|
DEFERRED
COMPENSATION |
|
Concerns
relating to “above-market” interest in deferred compensation
program |
|
|
|
Eliminated
all above-market interest earnings for NEOs (effective as of March
2021) and directors (effective as August 2020) such that they now
may only invest deferred compensation in third-party mutual or
exchange funds or a Comcast stock fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022
Proxy Statement 31
Table of
Contents
The Compensation
and Human Capital Committee considered our executive compensation
program holistically as it evaluated how to further enhance our
program design while ensuring that the resulting structure will
attract, retain and motivate our senior executives and align them
with shareholders over the long term. With this view in mind, it
determined that, in addition to the changes described above, the
vesting terms of our PSUs and options should be reduced to align
with broader market practice, with PSUs cliff-vesting at the end of
3 years (as opposed to over 5 years) and options vesting over 5
years (as opposed to over 9.5 years), and that the potential payout
of PSUs should be increased to up to 250% (from 125%) of target to
reward senior executives for outperformance against rigorous
goals.
Our Compensation
and Human Capital Committee and management team are committed to
continued engagement with shareholders to understand their
viewpoints and to discuss and demonstrate the important connection
between our compensation program, on the one hand, and our business
strategy, goals and financial and operating performance, on the
other hand. Our Compensation and Human Capital Committee, with the
assistance of Korn Ferry, continues to evaluate our compensation
program design. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee
believes that its policies and decisions are consistent with our
compensation philosophy and objectives and align the interests of
our NEOs with our long-term goals and the interests of our
shareholders without incenting inappropriate risk taking.
Executive
Compensation Best Practices
What We
Do |
|
|
|
Employ rigorous PSU
performance conditions.
Maintain robust stock
ownership guidelines. A person not in compliance cannot sell or
otherwise dispose of stock until the applicable ownership
requirement is met.
● CEO =
10x base salary
● NEOs =
3x base salary
● Nonemployee
directors = 5x annual cash retainer
Prohibit our executive
officers and directors from (i) pledging Comcast stock as
collateral or holding it in margin accounts and (ii) using any
strategies or products to hedge against potential changes in the
value of our stock.
Have an incentive
compensation recoupment (or “clawback”) policy applicable to our
executive officers.
Compensation and Human Capital
Committee directly engages Korn Ferry as its own independent
compensation consultant.
Use net-settled options, which
results in fewer shares issued and less dilution to our
shareholders than stock options exercised with a cash payment.
|
|
|
What We Don’t Do
Do not permit the repricing
of options of any kind.
Do not maintain any defined
benefit pension plans or supplemental executive retirement plans
for our NEOs.
None of our equity plans has
automatic (“single-trigger”) accelerated vesting provisions in
connection with a change in control. Mr. Roberts’ employment
agreement has a “double-trigger” change in control provision. No
other NEO has any change in control provisions in his or her
employment agreement.
Do not pay dividends or
dividend equivalents in respect of any unearned PSUs or RSUs or on
any stock options.
Do not provide premium
payments or reimbursements, or tax payments, to our NEOs under any
life or any other insurance policies.
Do not provide for any excise
or other tax gross-ups for our executive officers.
|
32
Table of
Contents
Our Approach to
Compensation
In designing our
compensation program, we evaluate both our business objectives and
the need to attract and retain uniquely talented and experienced
individuals who think strategically for the long term and perform
for our highly competitive businesses, particularly in light of the
challenging and evolving competitive, technological and regulatory
environments in which we operate. We employ a variety of elements
that further our shareholders’ interests by securing our
executives’ services in an exceedingly competitive talent market
and aligning the long-term interests of our executives to create
shareholder value.
● |
To motivate and retain our executives, we
provide pay opportunity levels that are highly competitive. |
|
|
● |
Our compensation program is designed to achieve an appropriate
balance of elements to reward our NEOs for their performance and
create long-term shareholder value. In addition to fixed
compensation, we provide short-term and long-term performance-based
compensation that includes company-specific performance goals, as
well as relative performance goals that measure our shareholder
value creation relative to market performance. |
|
|
● |
Our short-term annual bonus program includes quantitative
financial performance goals that are based, in part, on
enterprise-wide and business unit consolidated budgets that are
prepared annually and take into consideration the cyclicality of
working capital in our business, capital spending plans for the
upcoming year, target product rollout numbers and other relevant
factors. We balance out our annual bonus program by also incenting
attainment of strategic operating performance goals and key
stakeholder and sustainability initiatives. |
|
|
● |
Our annual long-term incentive program is composed of grants of
PSUs and stock options. PSUs awarded in 2021 have meaningful
performance conditions for vesting measured over a three-year
period based on two relative performance metrics relating to
Adjusted EPS growth and TSR as well as an absolute ROIC performance
metric, all of which balance internal goals and relative market
performance. Stock options are inherently performance-based in that
our stock price must appreciate for the options to deliver any
value. |
|
|
● |
The primary financial quantitative metrics used in our 2021
incentive compensation programs generally reflect those used
internally to measure our performance and externally to report to
investors. Many of these measures are tied to cash generation,
capital efficiency and generating sustained profitable growth over
time, as well as measure our growth and increase in shareholder
value relative to market peers. As a result, the financial metrics
used in our 2021 executive compensation program were: |
|
|
Annual Cash
Bonus |
Revenue |
Serves as the top line component to cash generation |
Adjusted EBITDA |
Reflects the operational performance of our businesses, taking into
account the costs of operating these businesses |
|
Free Cash Flow |
Measures, among other things, cash remaining after capital
investments that allows us to repay indebtedness, make strategic
investments and return capital to shareholders |
Long-Term
Incentive
Program |
Average ROIC |
Measures how well capital (equity and debt) is used to generate
earnings over a three-year period |
Relative Adjusted EPS Growth |
Measures earnings performance compared to equally sized peers over
a three-year period |
Relative TSR |
Measures total company achievement of shareholder returns compared
to equally sized peers over a three-year period |
Taken together,
the interplay of these elements provided a pay program that is
strongly aligned with shareholder interests and long-term value
creation, retains a high-quality executive team and compensates the
executive team when it does the right things to help our businesses
succeed. We believe that the significant changes we made to our
compensation program for 2021, as discussed above in “Shareholder
Feedback on Executive Compensation and Compensation-Related
Changes” and below in “Design and Structure of Executive
Compensation — Equity-Based Incentive Compensation” further enhance
the performance-based nature of our executive compensation
program.
2022
Proxy Statement 33
Table of
Contents
Design
and Structure of Executive Compensation
Elements of Compensation Program
We view the
executive compensation program on a “portfolio” basis to achieve an
appropriate balance of compensation elements to motivate and reward
our NEOs for their performance and create long-term shareholder
value. The following chart illustrates our view of the significant
aspects of the portfolio used for 2021. (See “Shareholder Feedback
on Executive Compensation and Compensation-Related Changes” above
and “Equity-Based Incentive Compensation” below for more
information about enhancements we made to our compensation program
design for 2021.)
TYPE |
ELEMENT |
WHY WE USED IT |
COMPENSATION
HIGHLIGHTS |
 |
Base Salary |
● Necessary to attract and
retain our NEOs.
● Serves as a
baseline measure of an NEO’s value.
● Guaranteed
compensation in exchange for investing in a career with us.
|
● Salary level is based on
individual performance, position within the organization and any
increase in duties and responsibilities.
|
 |
Annual Cash
Bonus |
● Provides a competitive annual
cash bonus opportunity and completes our competitive total annual
cash compensation package.
● Target bonus is
based on the Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s assessment
of the optimal mix of base salary and annual cash bonus
compensation.
● Supports our
objective that NEOs must balance achieving satisfactory or better
current year (short-term) results with long-term value
creation.
|
● Based on objective
quantitative financial performance metrics and quantitative and
qualitative goals relating to key operating performance goals.
● Includes a
qualitative portion based on stakeholder and sustainability
initiatives such as continued leadership in addressing the “digital
divide,” further progress on our DE&I and environmental
sustainability initiatives, and further enhancing our strong
culture of integrity and respect.
|
 |
Annual PSU Grants |
● Fosters a long-term
commitment, motivates executives to improve the long-term market
performance of our stock and focuses them on the long-term creation
of shareholder value.
● Links the NEOs’
decision-making with the long-term outcomes of those decisions.
● Creates a
meaningful retention tool and ties value ultimately realized to
longer-term performance.
|
● Cliff vest after three
years.
● Vesting is
dependent upon achievement of absolute and relative performance
metrics established at the beginning of the three-year period.
● Ultimate value of
shares acquired upon vesting depends on attainment of metrics and
stock price.
|
Annual Stock Option
Grants |
● Fosters a long-term
commitment, motivates executives to improve the long-term market
performance of our stock and focuses them on the long-term creation
of shareholder value.
● Links the NEOs’
decision-making with the long-term outcomes of those decisions.
● Relatively long
vesting period creates a significant retention tool and ties value
ultimately realized to our long-term performance.
|
● Vest over a five-year
period.
● Stock price must
appreciate for stock options to deliver value.
● Options are net
settled, resulting in fewer shares issued upon exercise.
|
VARIABLE,
LONG-TERM, PERFORMANCE-BASED VARIABLE, SHORT-TERM,
PERFORMANCE-BASED FIXED
34
Table of
Contents
Compensation
Decisions
Base
Salary
In 2021,
the Compensation and Human Capital Committee did not increase the
base salaries of our NEOs, other than those of Mr. Watson and Ms.
Strong. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee increased Mr.
Watson’s base salary after considering his exceptional leadership
as CEO of Comcast Cable and Ms. Strong’s base salary as a result of
her appointment as CEO of Sky.
In November
2021, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee and Mr. Roberts
agreed to reduce his annual base salary to $2.5 million, which will
further lower the proportion of his fixed versus variable
compensation, and to use this reduced salary for purposes of
calculating his annual cash bonus as if the reduction had been in
effect since the beginning of 2021.
Annual
Cash Bonus
Our
short-term incentive program includes meaningful performance-based
elements tied to financial goals, as well as incentives for
attainment of operational goals tied to key strategic initiatives
and progress toward key stakeholder and sustainability
initiatives.
● |
The target bonus
opportunity in 2021 was 300% of salary for each NEO. |
● |
Below are
the target weightings for each element of the annual cash bonus
plan for our NEOs in 2021. The maximum bonus achievable was 185%,
based on a maximum weight of 140% for all of the financial metrics
and of 22.5% for each of the operating performance and stakeholder
and sustainability-related goals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
(70%)* |
|
Operating
Performance (15%) |
|
Stakeholder
& Sustainability
Initiatives
(15%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA
(35%) |
|
Free
Cash
Flow
(28%) |
|
Revenue
(7%) |
|
Customer
Experience, Product Churn, Peacock User Growth, Flex Rollout,
Xfinity Mobile Performance & Organizational
Collaboration |
|
Bridging
the Digital Divide, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, Environmental
Sustainability & Company Culture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
For Messrs. Watson and
Shell and Ms. Strong, the same financial metrics and weightings
apply, calculated 50% at the Comcast consolidated level and 50% at
their respective business unit level. |
2021 Financial Metrics
and Results
The
performance ranges below were used as the financial performance
metrics for the NEOs’ 2021 target bonus. Achievement for each
financial metric would be zero if performance is below the minimum
threshold of the metric’s range, with potential payouts ranging
from 14% if achievement for all three financial metrics is at the
low end of the range to a maximum of 140% for achievement of all
three metrics at the top end of the range. See “2021 Performance”
above for a description of our Company’s strong financial
performance in 2021.
|
|
PERFORMANCE
RANGE(1)
($ IN BILLIONS) |
|
ACTUAL
ACHIEVEMENT(2)(3) |
Adjusted
EBITDA |
|
29.725 –
32.853 |
|
70% |
Free Cash
Flow |
|
8.439 –
11.417 |
|
56% |
Revenue |
|
107.114 –
118.390 |
|
11% |
(1) |
Amounts
reflected are on a consolidated basis and have been adjusted to
reflect Sky results on a constant currency basis. |
(2) |
Achievement percentages
are interpolated linearly between specified achievement levels and
are presented based on the maximum weighted levels of achievement
described in the section immediately above. |
(3) |
Because Messrs. Watson and
Shell and Ms. Strong’s annual cash bonus was based 50% on the above
consolidated financial metrics and 50% on the same metrics for
their respective business unit levels, their respective achievement
for all the financial metrics (on a combined basis) varied as
follows: Watson: 135%; Shell: 137%; and Strong: 121%. |
Table of
Contents
In setting
financial metrics for 2021, the Compensation and Human Capital
Committee and management were mindful of the inherent uncertainty
regarding the extent and duration of potential continued negative
impacts of COVID-19 on our businesses. However, as vaccination
rates increased and restrictive government mandates subsided at
various points throughout the course of 2021, the exceptional
leadership of our NEOs helped our business operations and financial
performance to rebound more quickly than expected as compared to
2020 performance. For example, as described above in “2021
Performance Overview,” our theme parks performed exceptionally
well, with strong attendance and financial results as we adapted to
find safe and creative ways to operate. Peacock, our streaming
service that launched in mid-2020, beat our own internal monthly
active account and revenue targets in 2021, and we continued to
find innovative ways to monetize our intellectual property through
new options for content licensing windows.
2021 Operating
Performance Goals and Results
Operating
performance goals accounted for 15% of the 2021 target annual
bonus, with potential payouts ranging from 0% to 22.5%. The
following goals and performance against those goals were evaluated
by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee in determining that
achievement could merit target payout levels. These considerations
included both quantifiable outcomes as to whether we met or
exceeded expectations of achievement and the Compensation and Human
Capital Committee’s holistic evaluation of the NEOs’ performance,
collectively and individually, in executing against strategic
operational priorities as described immediately below and in “2021
NEO Performance.” Certain details about the performance of our
operating goals are not disclosed due to competitive
concerns.
GOALS |
|
2021
PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS |
Product
Churn |
|
Product churn
relates to the stability of our cable customer base and customer
net additions. Comcast Cable’s customer relationship net additions
were driven by 1.3 million net new broadband customers in 2021,
bringing total broadband subscribers to 31.9 million at year end.
Customer churn, particularly in our U.S. broadband business and in
the United Kingdom at Sky, remained at historically low levels
during 2021. |
Peacock
User Growth |
|
Peacock
continued its growth of monthly active accounts in the United
States, ending 2021 with more accounts than we had initially
planned. We also plan to rollout Peacock content across Sky
territories, and have begun providing Sky customers in the United
Kingdom and Ireland with early access to Peacock. |
Xfinity
Mobile Performance |
|
Comcast Cable
wireless customer line net additions were 1.2 million, the best
annual result since we launched Xfinity Mobile in 2017. Our
wireless business also reached profitability on a standalone basis
for the first time since it was launched. |
Customer
Experience Metrics |
|
Customer
experience includes our relational net promoter score, unique
contact rate and other customer experience metrics. In 2021, our
agent-handled calls were reduced by 14%, truck rolls were reduced
by 18%, and our net promoter scores increased by 20% — collectively
showing that our self-help tools and processes continue to improve
customer experience metrics. |
Flex
Rollout |
|
Comcast Cable
continued its rollout of Flex, deploying over 2 million additional
boxes in 2021. Through our global technology platform, we have
expanded the reach of our Flex investment in the United States
through the deployment of our XClass TV. |
Organizational
Collaboration |
|
Our businesses
continued their strong collaboration with one another. In 2021, we
launched Sky Glass in the United Kingdom and XClass TV in the
United States, with both products leveraging our proprietary,
global technology platform as we continue to work to provide more
ways to bring the best of our entertainment operating system to
more consumers. Peacock’s user base has benefited from distribution
domestically through Comcast Cable’s X1 video service and Flex
customers, as well as internationally from Sky as noted
above. |
36
Table of
Contents
2021 Stakeholder and
Sustainability-Related Goals
Stakeholder
and sustainability-related goals accounted for 15% of the 2021
target annual bonus, with potential payouts ranging from 0% to
22.5%. The following goals and performance against those goals were
considered by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee in
determining that achievement could merit target payout levels.
Rather than reducing our stakeholder and sustainability goals to
any one metric or set of metrics, these considerations were
primarily based on the Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s
independent and holistic evaluation of the NEOs’ efforts,
collectively and individually, to further progress key stakeholder
and sustainability initiatives and priorities as described
immediately below and in “2021 NEO Performance.”
GOALS |
|
2021
PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS |
Bridging
the Digital Divide |
|
We
continued our strong leadership in bridging the digital divide by
actively sponsoring and participating in programs designed to
extend our broadband services to underserved and unserved Americans
in 2021 by:
● Promoting
and sponsoring our Internet Essentials program as America’s leading
broadband product for low-income families, including by expanding
eligibility and providing affordable opportunities for school
districts and other organizations to connect students to broadband
access at home; to date, we have collaborated with hundreds of
schools and organizations across the country.
● Supporting
and participating in the federal government’s broadband benefits
programs to provide discounted internet service to those in need,
namely the Emergency Broadband Benefit program that launched in May
2021 and its successor, longer-term Affordable Connectivity
Program that launched at the end of 2021. Through these programs,
which enable qualifying low-income customers to apply a financial
subsidy to our broadband services, customers can receive our
Internet Essentials service or our new enhanced Internet Essentials
Plus service with twice the download speed – up to 100 Mbps –
effectively for free.
● Participating
in federal, state and local programs designed to fund the expansion
of broadband to unserved Americans and extending our world
class network to new areas where reliable, high-speed
internet services had been unavailable.
● Continuing
the initiatives we had established in 2020 in response to the
global pandemic aimed at providing internet access to those who did
not have it, including providing eligible new customers with 60
days of free service, making our 1.5 million public Wi-Fi hotspots
available for free, waiving bad-debt program eligibility and
creating affordable and flexible payment plans to allow customers
and small businesses to retain their services.
● Partnering
with non-profit organizations and city leaders to create, through
the end of 2021, more than 1,000 Lift Zones in community centers
nationwide where students in need of internet-equipped
spaces for remote learning can connect to the internet to
participate in distance learning.
|
DE&I |
|
Our
DE&I efforts focus on areas where we believe we can make the
most impact given the nature of our business, such as workforce,
the programming we create and distribute and the supplier
relationships we have.
● In
2021, we continued our efforts to increase representation in
leadership roles, increasing representation of women and
people of color in vice president-level and above positions in
the United States to approximately 42% and 24%,
respectively.
● We
continued to amplify diverse voices and cultures through our media
platforms, including through Xfinity’s curated On Demand
special collections, NBCUniversal’s ‘The More You Know’
series of public service announcements and NBC News’ ‘The Racism
Virus’ on the stark rise in anti-Asian discrimination, to
name a few examples. NBCUniversal also launched NBCU
Academy, an innovative, multiplatform journalism training and
development program for students at Historically Black
Colleges and Universities and diverse-serving institutions,
as well as a multi-year $3.5 million scholarship fund for
underrepresented students.
|
Table of
Contents
GOALS |
|
2021
PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS |
|
|
● In
2021, we spent over $4.3 billion with diverse Tier 1 vendors (with
direct purchases from over 3,250 diverse suppliers) and over $390
million with diverse Tier 2 subcontractors.
● In
2021, we invested $25 million in the Seibert Williams Shank Clear
Vision Impact Fund, a diverse-led and diverse-serving financial
institution that provides direct support to local community
businesses, and $10 million in the Inclusiv Racial Equity and
Resilience Investment Fund, which is aimed at building equity in
credit unions led by and/or serving people of color.
|
Environmental
Sustainability |
|
Led by our
senior leadership team, we set a goal to be carbon neutral by 2035
in Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions across our global
operations in May 2021. We also created an enterprise steering
committee, led by Mr. Cavanagh and our Chief Legal Officer, to help
facilitate progress toward our carbon neutral goal and further
environmental initiatives. Knowing that purchased electricity
accounts for the majority of our Scope 1 and 2 emissions, we have
further developed our renewable energy procurement strategy,
signing in 2021 a long-term purchase agreement for renewable
electricity to power approximately 12% of our current U.S.
electricity use beginning in 2024-2025.
We also
reported for the first time under both the SASB and TCFD frameworks
in 2021.
|
Culture of
Integrity and Respect |
|
Individually
and as a whole, our NEOs provided critical leadership in furthering
each of the important stakeholder and sustainability initiatives
described above. They also reinforced our strong commitment to a
workplace culture that emphasizes integrity and respect and
intolerance of harassment and discrimination. |
2021 NEO
Performance
In evaluating the
strategic operating performance goals and stakeholder and
sustainability initiatives portions of the annual cash bonus, the
Compensation and Human Capital Committee also considered the
contribution of each NEO toward our company’s overall achievement
of, and progress toward, those goals, as well as each NEO’s overall
management and leadership of our company.
|
Brian L.
Roberts |
|
Mr. Roberts
led our company’s strategic focus on connectivity, aggregation and
streaming, which we believe will better position our company for
the long-term. Mr. Roberts set the tone for our businesses to
execute at the highest level, to work together across our
complementary, high-performing businesses at Comcast Cable,
NBCUniversal and Sky and to continue to accelerate convergence in
media and technology and leverage our global technology platform.
At the same time, he continued to guide our company’s overall
response to the pandemic and reinforce our stakeholder and
sustainability initiatives, all with a focus on doing the right
thing for all of our stakeholders and society at large. |
Michael J.
Cavanagh |
|
Mr. Cavanagh
led our businesses in responding to and reemerging from the depths
of the global pandemic. Mr. Cavanagh continued to focus on capital
allocation, balance sheet strength and our liquidity. He led
important decisions about return of capital alternatives, including
raising our dividend to $1.08 a share on an annualized basis for
2022, an increase of 8% year-over-year, and resuming our share
repurchase program in May 2021 after having paused it in 2019 to
accelerate the reduction of indebtedness incurred in connection
with the Sky acquisition. In addition to his financial leadership,
Mr. Cavanagh framed and led the execution of key decisions on
critical strategic and operational initiatives across all of our
businesses, as well as providing leadership alongside Mr. Roberts
to the entire company as we continue to adapt to the post-pandemic
environment. |
38
Table of
Contents
David N.
Watson |
|
Mr. Watson
successfully led Comcast Cable, adding 1.3 million net new
broadband customers and continuing our efforts to keep America
connected and employees safe throughout the pandemic. Under Mr.
Watson’s leadership, we continue to invest significantly in our
broadband network to better optimize performance, deliver faster
internet speeds and proactively fix problems. In 2021, for example,
we completed a series of tests that demonstrated the success of
DOCSIS 4.0 technology, culminating in a prototype modem capable of
delivering multi-gigabit speeds. Under his leadership, Comcast
Cable continued its strong financial and operational performance in
2021, with its revenue increasing by 7.1% to $64.3 billion and its
Adjusted EBITDA increasing by 11.2% to $28.1 billion. |
Jeffrey
Shell |
|
Mr. Shell
continued to successfully lead and mitigate negative pandemic
impacts on NBCUniversal in 2021. Under Mr. Shell’s leadership, our
theme parks performed exceptionally well, and we opened Universal
Beijing Resort in September 2021. He also continued to lead our
strategy for Peacock, which experienced significant growth in
monthly active accounts and revenue. NBCUniversal has also
innovated to create new pay windows for early viewing opportunities
to better monetize our content and intellectual property, including
on Peacock. NBCUniversal’s financial performance rebounded well in
2021, with its revenue increasing by 26.1% to $34.3 billion and its
Adjusted EBITDA increasing by 6.0% to $5.7 billion, including
Peacock losses. |
Dana
Strong |
|
Ms. Strong, in
her first year as CEO of Sky, provided strong leadership that
resulted in increased Sky Q penetration, the launch of Sky Glass
and securing the majority of Sky’s key content rights through 2025.
Under Ms. Strong’s leadership, Sky continued to progress its
environmental sustainability leadership in 2021, sponsoring the
United Nations’ 26th Climate Conference (COP26) in
Glasgow in which Ms. Strong participated as a speaker. Sky’s
financial performance rebounded well in 2021, with its revenue
increasing 9.1% to $20.3 billion, or 3.1% excluding the impact of
foreign currency. Sky Adjusted EBITDA increased 20.8% to $2.4
billion, or 10.2% excluding the impact of foreign currency. See
Appendix A for a reconciliation. |
2021 Bonus
Achievement
Performance
relative to the metrics and goals described above would result in
potential bonuses for the NEOs ranging from 151%-167% in light of
our strong operating and financial performance and exceptional NEO
leadership in 2021. After considering the faster than expected
rebound of our businesses due to progress in the control of the
pandemic and its effects generally, however, the Compensation and
Human Capital Committee, following discussion with management,
reduced the NEO bonuses to the levels set forth below. The
Compensation and Human Capital Committee also determined, at Mr.
Roberts’ request, to compute his bonus based on his reduced annual
salary of $2.5 million, as if the reduction had been implemented at
the beginning of 2021.
|
|
ROBERTS |
|
CAVANAGH |
|
WATSON |
|
SHELL |
|
STRONG |
Total Paid
(% of Target) |
|
125% |
|
125% |
|
133% |
|
133% |
|
133% |
Total Cash
Bonus Paid |
|
$8,625,586 |
|
$8,625,001 |
|
$8,969,828 |
|
$9,975,000 |
|
$8,247,836(1) |
(1) |
Ms. Strong’s bonus was
paid in British pounds sterling and was converted to U.S. dollars
using the 2021 average of daily spot rates of £1 to
$1.3757. |
Equity-Based
Incentive Compensation
To continue
to promote the alignment of our executive compensation program and
long-term shareholder value creation, and after considering
feedback received from our shareholders, the Compensation and Human
Capital Committee adopted a new approach to our equity-based
compensation program for 2021. The Compensation and Human Capital
Committee believes that this refocused approach reinforces our
performance culture by incorporating the achievement of longer-term
absolute and relative financial and share-based performance metrics
into our PSU awards as a further complement to the annual financial
and operational metrics used under our annual cash bonus program.
For a discussion of the key changes made to our equity compensation
program for 2021, please see “Shareholder Feedback on Executive
Compensation and Compensation-Related Changes” above.
Table of
Contents
The table
below reflects the key features of our equity compensation program
for 2021:
KEY
FEATURES |
|
2021 EQUITY
COMPENSATION PROGRAM |
Performance
Period |
|
● Three-year
cumulative performance period, with all performance goals measured
over the three-year period
● Cliff-vests
based on payout levels three years following grant
|
Performance
Goals |
|
● PSUs
earned based on achievement of two primary performance metrics,
each weighted 50%: (1) absolute ROIC and (2) relative Adjusted EPS
growth
● Attainment
of primary performance metrics is subject to a relative TSR
modifier
|
PSU Award
Payouts |
|
● Performance
must be achieved through a cumulative three-year period
● Potential
payout up to 250% of target, which rewards for outperformance
against rigorous goals and significant returns to our
investors
|
Stock
Option Vesting Period |
|
● Stock
options vest over a five-year period to more closely align with
broader market practice, while still retaining a longer vesting
period than many companies to reinforce a long-term
focus |
We believe
that the new PSU structure closely aligns the interests of our NEOs
with shareholders and long-term value creation, with the ROIC and
relative Adjusted EPS growth metrics serving as meaningful inputs
to value creation and the relative TSR modifier providing an output
measure of value creation. The combination of these performance
metrics, together with the financial metrics (revenue, Adjusted
EBITDA and Free Cash Flow), operating performance goals and the
evaluation of stakeholder and sustainability initiatives under our
annual cash bonus program, provide company-specific performance
goals that are directly linked with our NEOs’ management of our
company, while also satisfying shareholder return expectations. The
maximum payout under the PSU awards increased in 2021 from 125% to
250% of target to provide additional incentive for outperformance
and in recognition of the fact that a significant portion of our
NEOs’ compensation is delivered in the form of at-risk PSU awards,
the value of which may only be realized by our NEOs upon
achievement of financial and shareholder return performance
measures over a three-year period.
Consistent
with historical practice, our 2021 equity compensation program for
NEOs consisted of a mix of both PSU awards and stock options — in
2021, 60% of the target value of our NEOs’ equity awards was in the
form of PSUs and 40% was in the form of stock options. In
determining the total value of equity-based compensation, the
Compensation and Human Capital Committee considers, among other
things, the overall performance mix of an NEO’s total direct
compensation and the value of awards made to other executives, as
well as the value of equity-based compensation awarded to
comparable NEOs at our peer companies.
PSUs
2021 PSU
Awards
For PSUs
granted in 2021, we established two equally weighted primary
performance metrics that are each measured over a cumulative
three-year performance period beginning January 1 in the year of
grant:
● |
ROIC: measured on an
absolute basis for each year during the three-year period and
averaged to yield an average ROIC for the cumulative three-year
period |
● |
Relative
Adjusted EPS Growth: compound annual growth rate measured on a
relative basis at the end of the cumulative three-year performance
period against the companies comprising the S&P 100
Index |
The
ultimate payout of the PSUs is then subject to a relative TSR
performance modifier based on the percentile ranking of our TSR
over the three-year performance period relative to that of the
companies comprising the S&P 100 Index (“Relative TSR
Modifier”). We believe this modifier more directly links our equity
compensation program to shareholder returns by rewarding our
executives for sustained market outperformance, as well as
regulating payouts for market underperformance, even if financial
metrics are achieved at or above target.
We believe
the combination of these performance goals closely aligns the
potential payout of the PSUs to the value ultimately realized by
shareholders over a similar time horizon.
40
Table of
Contents
Earned PSUs
will cliff-vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant,
generally subject to continued employment through such
date.
The target
PSU values that the Compensation and Human Capital Committee
approved for 2021 PSUs are set forth below. These target values are
lower than the accounting values required to be set forth in the
Summary Compensation Table for 2021 as a result of certain
assumptions and valuation methodologies required under applicable
accounting standards.
NAME |
|
PSUs
($) |
Mr.
Roberts |
|
12,720,000 |
Mr.
Cavanagh |
|
9,480,000 |
Mr.
Watson |
|
6,300,000 |
Mr.
Shell |
|
5,160,000 |
Ms.
Strong |
|
3,150,000 |
For more
information on PSUs granted in 2021, see “Grants of Plan-Based
Awards” table below.
Prior PSU Award
Vestings in 2021
PSUs
granted to NEOs before 2021 were earned based on a sliding-scale
tied to increases in annual year-over-year Adjusted EBITDA (which
were measured each year for a total of five years). For PSU awards
granted in 2017 through 2020, vestings were based on the highest
vesting percentage of any prior vesting tranche, or such higher
vesting percentage as may be attained for a subsequent tranche
based on the same performance condition and achievement ranges
provided for in the applicable PSU award. Any portion of PSUs that
fail to vest in a year is permanently forfeited, as occurred with
the first tranche of vesting for PSUs granted in 2020. The
achievement for 2021 of the Adjusted EBITDA performance metrics for
PSUs granted in 2017 through 2020 resulted in maximum achievement
at 125% for all remaining tranches of PSUs.
Stock
Options
Approximately 40% of the
target value of our NEOs’ 2021 equity awards was in the form of
stock options. While the stock options granted to our NEOs do not
have any express performance conditions, the value ultimately
realized for such awards is dependent on the appreciation of our
stock price from the date of grant, which further aligns our NEOs’
interests with those of our shareholders.
For the
stock options granted to our NEOs beginning in 2021, the
Compensation and Human Capital Committee determined to shift away
from our historical practice of granting options with a 9.5-year
vesting schedule and instead granted stock options with a five-year
vesting schedule, with 40% of the options vesting in year two and
the remaining 60% vesting in equal annual installments over the
next three years. We believe this vesting schedule is more closely
aligned with current market practice, making our stock option
program more competitive for attracting and retaining senior
executives in the competitive talent market in which we operate
while continuing to focus on the long term.
Deferred
Compensation
Since March
2021, amounts that our NEOs deferred under our deferred
compensation plans must be notionally invested in either a company
stock fund, which tracks the value of our Class A common stock, or
several third-party mutual and exchange funds, which eliminates
above-market interest earnings that had previously been earned
through investments in an income fund with a fixed rate of return.
Our deferred compensation plan is described in more detail below in
the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in and as of Fiscal
Year-End” table.
Procedures
for Determining Compensation
Compensation
and Human Capital Committee’s Role, Process and
Validation
The
Compensation and Human Capital Committee approves the nature and
amount of compensation paid to, and the employment and related
agreements entered into with, our executive officers, and oversees
broad-based cash bonus and equity-based plans, approving guidelines
for grants of awards under these plans and determining and
overseeing our compensation and benefits policies
generally.
Table of
Contents
In 2021,
the Compensation and Human Capital Committee reviewed for our
NEOs:
● |
Each element
of our NEOs’ compensation for internal consistency. |
● |
Various
analyses provided by its independent compensation consultant,
including: |
|
● |
an assessment of the
composition of our peer groups; |
|
● |
a competitive pay
assessment (comparing NEO compensation to that of executives
holding comparable positions at our peer group companies as
disclosed in proxy statements and to broad groups of companies in
published surveys, and analyzing components of pay compared to
those of our peer group companies (e.g., target pay levels, fixed
vs. variable, components of long-term equity)); |
|
● |
a financial performance
review (comparing our performance relative to our peer group
companies with respect to growth in adjusted EBITDA, free cash
flow, revenue and TSR, based on financial data from a third-party
source); |
|
● |
a compensation sharing
analysis (analyzing the actual pay delivered to our NEOs as a
percentage of our Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow as compared to
our peer group companies); |
|
● |
an incentive compensation
design analysis (analyzing various annual bonus and long-term
incentive design elements); and |
|
● |
an analysis of equity
dilution resulting from, and annual usage rates in, our
equity-based compensation plans as compared to our peer group
companies (i.e., overhang and burn rates). |
|
|
|
● |
After taking
into account the analyses above, the Compensation and Human Capital
Committee evaluated our financial performance, as compared to our
peers over time, as it related to our strongly competitive
compensation philosophy. |
● |
The
Compensation and Human Capital Committee also reviews, but does not
give significant weight to, aggregate amounts realized or
realizable from prior years’ compensation when making decisions
regarding current compensation. It believes that value realized on
prior years’ compensation from stock appreciation is the reward for
the NEOs’ work over that period and reflects the achievement of our
long-term goals and, conversely, that lesser amounts realized on
prior years’ compensation reflect a lack of achievement of our
long-term goals. As such, the Compensation and Human Capital
Committee believes that realized or realizable equity compensation
is inherently aligned with our long-term performance and
shareholders’ interests. |
● |
In addition, the
Compensation and Human Capital Committee annually reviews the
nature and mix of compensation elements, as well as compensation
plan design and award terms, to ensure that our compensation
program does not include inadvertent incentives for our NEOs to
take inappropriate business risks by making decisions that may be
in their best interests but not in the best interests of our
shareholders. In conducting this review, the Compensation and Human
Capital Committee also considers specific business risks identified
through our ERM process. |
Following
these reviews and assessments, and with these goals in mind, the
Compensation and Human Capital Committee determines what it
believes to be an appropriate current year compensation package for
each NEO. This process includes subjective criteria and involves
the exercise of discretion and judgment. Based on these reviews,
the Compensation and Human Capital Committee believes the design of
the compensation program for 2021 is appropriate.
Role
of Compensation Consultants
The
Compensation and Human Capital Committee has directly engaged Korn
Ferry as its own independent compensation consultant. In
determining 2021 compensation, the Compensation and Human Capital
Committee directed Korn Ferry to provide it with various
compensation analyses as described below; Korn Ferry did not
recommend or determine compensation levels or elements, performance
targets or compensation plan design.
The
Compensation and Human Capital Committee assessed Korn Ferry’s work
as required under SEC rules and concluded that its work for the
Compensation and Human Capital Committee in 2021 did not raise any
conflicts of interest. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee
reached this determination by reviewing fees paid to Korn Ferry and
evaluating its work under applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules on
conflicts of interest.
Compensation
Consultant Services
Korn Ferry
provides research, analysis and input as to the form and amount of
executive and director compensation, which generally includes
market research utilizing information derived from proxy
statements, surveys and its own consulting experience and insight,
as well as the provision of other methodological standards and
policies in accordance with its established procedures. This
research, analysis and input has been provided to both our
Compensation and Human Capital Committee and to management. The
Compensation and Human Capital Committee collaborated with Korn
Ferry to
42
Table of
Contents
determine
and approve the parameters used to conduct the assessment work,
including items such as the composition of peer groups, the
relevant market statistical reference points within the data (e.g.,
median) and the elements of compensation. Korn Ferry did not
determine or recommend the form or amount of compensation of our
NEOs for 2021.
In 2021, we
paid Korn Ferry approximately $330,000 for services related to
executive and director compensation and approximately $1,097,000
for leadership, succession, organizational strategy and talent
consulting services and executive search services.
As part of
their job responsibilities, certain of our executive officers
participate both in gathering and presenting facts related to
compensation and benefits matters as requested by the Compensation
and Human Capital Committee and in formulating and making
recommendations to the Compensation and Human Capital Committee in
these areas. These executives, together with our employees who work
in the compensation area, also conduct research and consult with
compensation consultants, legal counsel and other expert sources to
keep abreast of developments in these areas. All decisions,
however, regarding the compensation of our NEOs are made by the
Compensation and Human Capital Committee and are reviewed by the
Board, following reviews and discussions held in executive
sessions.
Use of
Competitive Data
While peer
group and various compensation survey analyses are considered
important and valuable by the Compensation and Human Capital
Committee, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee does not
make any determination of, or change to, compensation in reaction
to market data alone. Rather, it uses this information as one of
several considerations to inform its decision and put it in context
in determining compensation levels (and when to change compensation
levels).
Peer
Group
The
Compensation and Human Capital Committee, advised by Korn Ferry,
reviewed the criteria for selecting members of our peer groups and
determined to combine the entertainment/media and
transmission/distribution peer groups that had been previously used
into one core peer group given the accelerating convergence in
media and technology and the complementary nature of, and
consolidation in, the media and distribution industries.
Below are
the companies in our core peer group for 2021, which are unchanged
from our 2020 peers:
● Alphabet,
Inc.
● AT&T
Inc.
● Charter
Communications, Inc.
● Warner
Bros. Discovery, Inc. (f/k/a Discovery, Inc.)
● DISH
Network Corporation
● Fox
Corp
● Lumen
Technologies, Inc.
|
|
● Meta
Platforms, Inc. (f/k/a Facebook, Inc.)
● Netflix,
Inc.
● Paramount
Global (f/k/a ViacomCBS Inc.)
● T-Mobile
US, Inc.
● The
Walt Disney Company
● Verizon
Communications Inc.
|
Our peer
group analyses indicate that overall, our “pay at risk” practices
are generally aligned with peer group practices.
● |
Comparisons for (i) Mr.
Roberts were made to peer chief executive officers for the peer
group, (ii) Mr. Cavanagh were made to peer chief financial officers
for the peer group, and (iii) Messrs. Watson and Shell and Ms.
Strong were made by ordinal rank (i.e., the position in the Summary
Compensation Table), with supplemental comparisons to peer chief
executive officers of the peer group. |
● |
As a supplemental
reference point to further inform the Compensation and Human
Capital Committee, comparisons were made to general industry peer
groups with revenues similar in size to our business as a whole and
our business units. |
● |
The
Compensation and Human Capital Committee does not determine an
NEO’s target compensation solely based on a specific reference
point within our peer group; instead, it reviews our peer group
analyses, as well as the other analyses discussed in “Compensation
and Human Capital Committee’s Role, Process and Validation,” both
to validate our compensation program design and to inform its
judgment in determining target compensation. |
Table of
Contents
Assessing
NEO Performance
In
determining an NEO’s individual compensation, the Compensation and
Human Capital Committee:
● |
Sets specific factors to
be used in evaluating Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Roberts discusses with
the Compensation and Human Capital Committee the performance of our
other NEOs. |
● |
Assesses each NEO’s
responsibilities and roles with respect to overall corporate
policy-making, management, operations and administration, as well
as the importance of retaining the NEO. |
● |
Evaluates each NEO’s prior
year performance, both in terms of their contribution to our
performance and as compared to their individual performance
goals. |
● |
Evaluates
our overall prior year performance, both in terms of financial
results and progress on strategic initiatives, including a
comparison of our performance to our competitors. |
The
Compensation and Human Capital Committee employs a rigorous process
to evaluate our NEOs’ performance that informs its compensation
decisions for the year, including those related to an NEO’s base
salary and annual equity awards and the attainment of qualitative
objectives for our annual cash bonus. This design allows our
Compensation and Human Capital Committee to employ a holistic
evaluation process with extensive performance reviews, taking into
account factors in and out of management’s control, while balancing
it with our financial and shareholder outcomes, to get to a better
result than a purely formulaic calculation would
provide.
Each year,
our Compensation and Human Capital Committee establishes a set of
defined objectives for the qualitative portion of our annual cash
bonus, which may be tied to an NEO’s or our company’s overall
performance, strategic operating performance goals or stakeholder
and sustainability initiatives, such as continued leadership in
addressing the “digital divide,” further progress on our DE&I
and environmental sustainability initiatives, and further enhancing
our strong culture of integrity and respect, at the time it
determines the quantitative metrics. In determining payout levels
on the qualitative metrics, the Compensation and Human Capital
Committee critically evaluates our company and NEO performance and
progress based on the defined objectives.
See
“Compensation Decisions” above for information on NEO performance
and decisions made in respect of 2021.
Other
Compensation Policies and Considerations
Executive
Stock Ownership Policy
We have a
stock ownership policy for members of our senior management,
including our NEOs, that is designed to increase our executives’
ownership stake in our company and align their interests with those
of our shareholders.
|
MULTIPLE OF
BASE SALARY
REQUIRED |
COMPLIANCE
STATUS AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 2021 |
Brian L.
Roberts |
10x |
In
compliance |
Michael J.
Cavanagh |
3x |
In
compliance |
David N.
Watson |
3x |
In
compliance |
Jeffrey
Shell |
3x |
In
compliance |
Dana
Strong |
3x |
In
compliance |
“Ownership”
includes (i) stock owned directly or indirectly, (ii) shares
credited under our employee stock purchase plan, which must be held
for one year from the date credited, and (iii) 60% of deferred
vested shares, shares deemed invested in the company stock fund
under our deferred compensation plans and the pre-tax net number of
shares deliverable upon the exercise of vested stock options. There
is a phase-in period of six years after the year in which an
executive first becomes
44
Table of
Contents
subject to
the policy to allow the executive to meet the full stock ownership
requirement. If an executive is subject to a phase-in period, we
consider them to be in compliance with the policy if they meet the
reduced stock ownership requirements over time under such phase-in.
In determining compliance, the Compensation and Human Capital
Committee may consider any noncompliance that occurs solely or
primarily from a decline in the market price of our stock. If an
executive is not in compliance, he or she is prohibited from
selling our stock (unless a hardship exemption is
granted).
Policies
Regarding Trading Activities and Prohibitions on Hedging and
Pledging
Our trading
policy prohibits our executive officers, certain other high-level
employees and directors from buying or selling any of our
securities during specified blackout periods, and, when outside of
those blackout periods, they may only buy or sell our securities
with prior approval in accordance with internal procedures. This
seeks to ensure that our executive officers and directors will not
trade in our securities at a time when they are in possession of
material, nonpublic information.
Our
policies prohibit our executive officers and directors from (i)
using any strategies or products (including derivative securities,
such as put or call options, or short-selling techniques) to hedge
against potential changes in the value of our stock and (ii)
holding our stock in margin accounts or pledging our stock as
collateral for a loan.
No
Automatic Payments in Connection with a Change in
Control
We
generally do not have any benefits, such as accelerated vesting of
equity awards, that are “triggered” automatically as a result of a
“change in control” (a “single trigger”) or the occurrence of one
or more specified events (a “double trigger”) that may follow a
change in control, such as termination of employment without cause.
Instead, we believe it is in the best interests of our company for
our Board and Compensation and Human Capital Committee, who are
subject to fiduciary obligations to act in a manner they believe to
be in the best interests of our company and shareholders, to retain
the discretion to determine whether it is appropriate to accelerate
the vesting of stock options and/or stock units or provide other
benefits in connection with a particular change in control
transaction.
Mr.
Roberts’ employment agreement provides that if his employment is
terminated following a change in control, that termination will be
treated as a termination without cause for the purpose of
determining his benefits in those circumstances under his
employment agreement. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee
approved this provision as a fair and reasonable protection for our
Chief Executive Officer in the event of a change in
control.
Payments
in Connection with a Termination of Employment
Payments to
our NEOs upon a termination of employment are described under the
“Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” table
below. These compensation arrangements are contained in each NEO’s
employment or other agreements and are not a factor in the
Compensation and Human Capital Committee’s determination of current
year compensation elements. These arrangements were arrived at as a
result of arm’s-length negotiations in connection with entering
into each such agreement, based on the Compensation and Human
Capital Committee’s decision that it was appropriate to provide
more favorable arrangements than those offered to nonexecutive
employees upon termination of employment.
Recoupment
(or “Clawback”) Policy
We have an
incentive compensation recoupment (or “clawback”) policy providing
that, if it is determined by our Board that gross negligence,
intentional misconduct or fraud by one of our executive officers or
former executive officers caused or partially caused the
restatement of all or a portion of our financial statements, the
Board, in its sole discretion, may, to the extent permitted by law
and our benefit plans, policies and agreements, and to the extent
it determines in its sole judgment that it is in our best interests
to do so, require repayment of all or a portion of any annual cash
bonus, vested stock units (time- or performance-based) or other
incentive-based compensation paid to such executive officer or
former executive officer (and/or effect the cancellation of
unvested stock units) if: (i) the amount or vesting of the
incentive-based compensation was calculated based upon, or
contingent on, the achievement of financial or operating results
that were the subject of or affected by the restatement and (ii)
the amount or vesting of the incentive-based compensation would
have been less had the financial statements been correct. The
Compensation and Human Capital Committee and the Governance and
Corporate Responsibility Committee review this policy from time to
time, and they will review it following the SEC’s adoption of a
final rule under the Dodd-Frank Act regarding incentive-based
compensation recoupment.
Table of
Contents
Award
Timing
Our annual
equity incentive awards are granted in accordance with
pre-established grant dates.
Tax
and Accounting Considerations
The
Compensation and Human Capital Committee considers accounting and
tax implications of our compensation and benefit programs,
including with respect to the tax deductibility of our executive
compensation. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally
limits the tax deductibility of compensation paid by public
companies to certain executive officers to $1 million. In the
exercise of its business judgment and in accordance with its
compensation philosophy, the Compensation and Human Capital
Committee has previously awarded, and continues to have the
flexibility to award, compensation that is not tax deductible if it
determines that such award is in our shareholders’ best
interests.
In
addition, the Internal Revenue Code limits the amount that
companies can deduct for the personal use of Company-provided
aircraft to the amount recognized as income by the executives who
used the aircraft. In 2021, the total amount of our disallowed tax
deduction resulting from the personal use of Company-provided
aircraft by our NEOs and any guests was approximately $9.3
million.
Other
Considerations
The
Compensation and Human Capital Committee is aware that Mr. Roberts
is our shareholder with the greatest beneficial voting power. The
Compensation and Human Capital Committee maintains an objective
stance toward Mr. Roberts’ compensation. The Compensation and Human
Capital Committee uses the same methods, tools and processes to
determine Mr. Roberts’ compensation as it does for our other
NEOs.
Compensation and Human Capital Committee
Report
We, the
members of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee of the
Board of Directors, have reviewed and discussed with management the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on this review and
discussion, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy
statement.
Members of the
Compensation and Human Capital Committee
Edward D.
Breen (Chair)
Gerald L. Hassell
David C. Novak
46
Table of
Contents
Executive Compensation
Tables
Summary Compensation
Table
Our NEOs are: our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer (Mr. Brian L. Roberts), our Chief Financial
Officer (Mr. Michael J. Cavanagh) and our next three most highly
compensated executive officers (Messrs. David N. Watson and Jeffrey
Shell and Ms. Dana Strong). Information is presented only for 2020
and 2021 for Mr. Shell, who first became an NEO with respect to
2020, and only for 2021 for Ms. Strong, who first became an NEO
with respect to 2021.
NAME AND
PRINCIPAL POSITION |
|
YEAR |
|
SALARY(1)
($) |
|
STOCK
AWARDS(2)
($) |
|
OPTION
AWARDS(3)
($) |
|
NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN
COMPENSATION(4)
($) |
|
CHANGE IN
PENSION
VALUE AND
EARNINGS ON
NONQUALIFIED
DEFERRED
COMPENSATION(5)
($) |
|
ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION(6)
($) |
|
TOTAL
($) |
Brian L. Roberts
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
2021 |
|
|
3,249,415 |
|
|
|
13,512,534 |
|
|
|
8,475,488 |
|
|
|
8,625,586 |
|
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
113,726 |
|
|
|
33,978,581 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
3,439,245 |
|
|
|
10,585,278 |
|
|
|
10,600,149 |
|
|
|
7,738,302 |
|
|
|
150,134 |
|
|
|
200,159 |
|
|
|
32,713,267 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
3,291,832 |
|
|
|
5,330,304 |
|
|
|
5,350,324 |
|
|
|
9,974,249 |
|
|
|
7,560,231 |
|
|
|
4,863,243 |
|
|
|
36,370,183 |
|
Michael J. Cavanagh
Chief Financial Officer |
|
2021 |
|
|
2,300,000 |
|
|
|
10,072,244 |
|
|
|
6,315,164 |
|
|
|
8,625,001 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
44,587 |
|
|
|
27,356,996 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2,388,462 |
|
|
|
7,039,868 |
|
|
|
7,050,441 |
|
|
|
5,374,039 |
|
|
|
3,335,892 |
|
|
|
62,088 |
|
|
|
25,250,790 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
2,285,908 |
|
|
|
6,725,376 |
|
|
|
4,749,955 |
|
|
|
6,926,300 |
|
|
|
3,831,120 |
|
|
|
2,280,818 |
|
|
|
26,799,477 |
|
David N. Watson
CEO of Comcast Cable |
|
2021 |
|
|
2,248,077 |
|
|
|
6,695,556 |
|
|
|
4,195,328 |
|
|
|
8,969,828 |
|
|
|
565,527 |
|
|
|
57,625 |
|
|
|
22,731,941 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2,039,794 |
|
|
|
4,195,048 |
|
|
|
4,199,443 |
|
|
|
5,943,952 |
|
|
|
3,285,243 |
|
|
|
25,651 |
|
|
|
19,689,131 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
1,813,904 |
|
|
|
3,237,696 |
|
|
|
3,251,010 |
|
|
|
4,580,108 |
|
|
|
2,522,306 |
|
|
|
1,534,454 |
|
|
|
16,939,478 |
|
Jeffrey Shell
CEO of NBCUniversal |
|
2021 |
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
5,481,336 |
|
|
|
3,438,588 |
|
|
|
9,975,000 |
|
|
|
50,907 |
|
|
|
114,104 |
|
|
|
21,559,935 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2,614,534 |
|
|
|
3,744,972 |
|
|
|
3,750,179 |
|
|
|
5,882,702 |
|
|
|
545,769 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
16,548,156 |
|
Dana Strong(7)
CEO of Sky |
|
2021 |
|
|
2,080,679 |
|
|
|
3,347,778 |
|
|
|
2,097,664 |
|
|
|
8,247,836 |
|
|
|
23,974 |
|
|
|
174,091 |
|
|
|
15,972,022 |
|
|
|
(1) |
In November 2021, the Compensation and Human
Capital Committee and Mr. Roberts agreed to reduce his annual base
salary to $2.5 million. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis —
Compensation Decisions — Base Salary” above for additional
information. Salary amounts for 2020 included an extra bi-weekly
pay period as compared to 2019 and 2021. |
|
|
(2) |
Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of PSUs
and RSUs granted to the NEOs in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic
718, Compensation — Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”).
These amounts, which do not correspond to the actual values that
may be realized by the NEOs or to the values approved by the
Compensation and Human Capital Committee, were calculated using the
valuation assumptions discussed in the “Share-Based Compensation”
footnote to the financial statements in our Annual Reports on Form
10-K for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2020 and 2021. The
amounts were determined by multiplying the Class A common stock
closing price on the date of grant by the number of shares subject
to the grant and, for PSUs as defined in the Glossary to FASB ASC
Topic 718, taking into account the probable outcome of the PSUs’
performance conditions as of the date of grant and excluding the
effect of estimated forfeitures in accordance with SEC rules. The
amounts were also discounted to consider that dividend equivalents
that accrue during the vesting period are not paid out until the
underlying shares vest. The following are the values of the PSUs
granted in 2021 as of their grant date assuming attainment of the
maximum level of performance: Mr. Roberts ($33,781,335), Mr.
Cavanagh ($25,180,610), Mr. Watson ($16,738,890), Mr. Shell
($13,703,340) and Ms. Strong ($8,369,445). See also “Compensation
Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Decisions — Equity-Based
Compensation” for the target PSU values that the Compensation and
Human Capital Committee approved for 2021, which are lower than the
amounts required to be reported in this table. |
|
|
(3) |
Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock
options granted to the NEOs in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
Under SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated
forfeitures. These amounts, which do not correspond to the actual
values that may be realized by the NEOs, were calculated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model, based upon the following
valuation assumptions for options granted in March 2021 to our NEOs
for their annual option awards: an expected volatility of 22.8%, an
expected term to exercise of 5.9 years, an interest rate of 0.92%
and a dividend yield of 1.84%. For information on valuation
assumptions with respect to grants made before 2021, refer to the
footnotes in the “Summary Compensation Table” in our definitive
proxy statements filed with the SEC in 2020 and 2019. See the
“Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below for additional
information on options granted in 2021. |
|
|
(4) |
Amounts represent annual performance-based bonuses. Mr.
Roberts’ bonus was based on his reduced annual salary of $2.5
million, as if the reduction had been implemented at the beginning
of 2021. See the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below and
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis —Compensation Decisions —
Annual Cash Bonus” above for additional information on these
bonuses and the achievement of specified metrics in 2021. |
|
|
(5) |
Amounts represent the dollar value of interest earned on
compensation deferred in “income funds” under our deferred
compensation plans in excess of 120% of the long-term applicable
federal rate. Effective March 2021, NEOs were prohibited from
deferring compensation into the income fund and no longer earn
interest above the applicable federal rate. See “Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation in and as of Fiscal Year-End” below. |
2022 Proxy Statement 47
Table of
Contents
(6) |
Amounts for 2021 include: (a) company
contributions in January 2021 to our retirement-investment plan
accounts in the amount of $10,000 for each NEO; (b) amounts on
account of personal use of Company-provided aircraft (Mr. Roberts,
$103,726; Mr. Cavanagh, $34,587; Mr. Watson, $47,625; Mr. Shell,
$104,104; and Ms. Strong, $0), (c) certain relocation benefits
provided to Ms. Strong in connection with her appointment as CEO of
Sky and her relocation from the United States to the United
Kingdom, in the amount of $150,639 and (d) costs related to
executive medical benefits in the United Kingdom provided to Ms.
Strong in the amount of $13,452. Where applicable, amounts for Ms.
Strong were converted from British pounds sterling to U.S. dollars
using the 2021 average of daily spot rates of £1 to $1.3757. |
|
|
|
For security and business reasons, Company practices and policy
strongly encourage, and in some cases may require, Mr. Roberts to
use Company-provided aircraft for business and personal travel. Our
other NEOs also have access to Company-provided aircraft for
personal travel, as it affords all of our NEOs greater security,
allows travel time to be used productively and enables them to be
immediately available to respond to business priorities from any
location. |
|
|
|
Our policy allows an NEO to bring guests, such as family
members, on flights on Company-provided aircraft. The NEOs are
required to pay us for personal use of Company-provided aircraft in
amounts determined by Company policy. The NEOs are imputed income
for costs related to use of Company-provided aircraft when required
under Internal Revenue Code guidelines. We do not reimburse the
NEOs for any taxes incurred as a result of imputed income. In
addition, the Internal Revenue Code limits the amount that we can
deduct for the personal use of Company-provided aircraft to the
amount recognized as income by our executives who use the aircraft;
the amounts in the table above do not include our 2021 disallowed
tax deduction of $9.3 million resulting from the personal use of
Company-provided aircraft by our NEOs and any guests. |
|
|
|
The amounts reflected for each NEO on account of personal use
of Company-provided aircraft indicate the extent to which the
incremental cost of such use exceeds the amount paid to us by the
NEO. The aggregate incremental cost for a personal flight on a
charter plane is the cost of the flight as charged to us by the
charter company. The aggregate incremental cost for a personal
flight taken on a third party-owned plane that is serviced by us
includes all variable costs attributable to that flight (including
for repositioning flights), such as fuel, trip and allocable
maintenance expenses and third-party lease payments. The aggregate
incremental cost for a personal flight on a Company plane includes
all variable costs for the year, such as fuel, maintenance and
other trip expenses, to arrive at a variable cost per hour that we
then multiply by the number of hours the NEO used the aircraft for
personal travel (including the hours for repositioning flights).
These methodologies exclude fixed costs, as these costs do not
change based on usage. Ms. Strong also has access to a
Company-provided car for personal travel, but she has fully
reimbursed the Company for the incremental costs associated with
such use. |
|
|
|
For all other benefits that would otherwise be considered
perquisites, our NEOs are required to pay us in full (and have paid
us in full) for such benefits. |
|
|
(7) |
Ms. Strong became an executive officer in 2021 and was not an
NEO for 2020 or 2019. For 2021, the portion of Ms. Strong’s base
salary paid in British pounds sterling was £1,464,072 and her cash
bonus (paid in March 2022) was £5,995,374. The amount of British
pounds sterling was converted to U.S. dollars using the 2021
average of daily spot rates of £1 to $1.3757. |
Grants of Plan-Based
Awards
The table below provides information about equity and non-equity
awards granted to our NEOs in 2021 as follows: (1) the grant date
for equity awards; (2) the estimated future payouts under
non-equity incentive plan awards (columns (a), (b) and (c)); (3)
the estimated future payouts under equity incentive plan awards,
which consist of PSUs (columns (d), (e) and (f)); (4) option
awards, which consist of the number of shares underlying stock
options (column (g)); (5) the exercise price of the stock option
awards, which reflects the closing price of our Class A common
stock on the date of grant (column (h)); and (6) the grant date
fair value of each equity award computed in accordance with FASB
ASC Topic 718 (column (i)).
|
|
|
|
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER
NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
AWARDS(1)
($) |
|
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS(2) |
|
ALL
OTHER
OPTION
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING |
|
EXERCISE
OR BASE
PRICE OF
OPTION
AWARDS |
|
GRANT DATE
FAIR VALUE
OF STOCK
AND OPTION
AWARDS(4) |
NAME |
|
GRANT
DATE |
|
THRESHOLD
(a) |
|
TARGET
(b) |
|
MAXIMUM
(c) |
|
THRESHOLD
(d) |
|
TARGET
(e) |
|
MAXIMUM
(f) |
|
OPTIONS(3)
(g) |
|
($)
(h) |
|
($)
(i) |
Brian L. Roberts |
|
— |
|
|
1,364,754 |
|
|
|
9,748,245 |
|
|
|
18,034,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,818 |
|
|
|
233,700 |
|
|
|
584,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,512,534 |
|
|
3/1/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
879,200 |
|
|
|
54.45 |
|
|
|
8,475,488 |
|
Michael J. Cavanagh |
|
— |
|
|
966,000 |
|
|
|
6,900,000 |
|
|
|
12,765,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,662 |
|
|
|
174,200 |
|
|
|
435,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,072,244 |
|
|
3/1/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
655,100 |
|
|
|
54.45 |
|
|
|
6,315,164 |
|
David N. Watson |
|
— |
|
|
944,192 |
|
|
|
6,744,231 |
|
|
|
12,476,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,712 |
|
|
|
115,800 |
|
|
|
289,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,695,556 |
|
|
3/1/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435,200 |
|
|
|
54.45 |
|
|
|
4,195,328 |
|
48
Table of
Contents
|
|
|
|
ESTIMATED
FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER
NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN
AWARDS(1)
($) |
|
ESTIMATED
FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER
EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS(2) |
|
ALL
OTHER
OPTION
AWARDS:
NUMBER
OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING |
|
EXERCISE
OR
BASE
PRICE
OF
OPTION
AWARDS |
|
GRANT DATE
FAIR
VALUE
OF
STOCK
AND
OPTION
AWARDS(4) |
NAME |
|
GRANT
DATE |
|
THRESHOLD
(a) |
|
TARGET
(b) |
|
MAXIMUM
(c) |
|
THRESHOLD
(d) |
|
TARGET
(e) |
|
MAXIMUM
(f) |
|
OPTIONS(3)
(g) |
|
($)
(h) |
|
($)
(i) |
Jeffrey Shell |
|
— |
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
|
|
13,875,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,775 |
|
|
|
94,800 |
|
|
|
237,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,481,336 |
|
|
3/1/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,700 |
|
|
|
54.45 |
|
|
|
3,438,588 |
|
Dana Strong(5) |
|
— |
|
|
868,193 |
|
|
|
6,201,381 |
|
|
|
11,472,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,856 |
|
|
|
57,900 |
|
|
|
144,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,347,778 |
|
|
3/1/2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,600 |
|
|
|
54.45 |
|
|
|
2,097,664 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents annual performance-based bonus
awards granted under our cash bonus plans. The actual amounts
earned with respect to these bonuses are included in the “Summary
Compensation Table” above under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation” column. |
|
|
(2) |
The amounts in columns (d) through (f) represent shares of
Class A common stock underlying PSUs granted under our 2002
Restricted Stock Plan that vest 100% over three years based on the
achievement of the performance conditions. PSUs will be earned
based on achievement of two primary performance metrics over a
three year period beginning in 2021, each weighted 50%: (i) ROIC,
calculated based on our ROIC for each year during the three-year
performance period and averaged at the end of such period to yield
an average ROIC for the cumulative three-year period; and (ii)
Relative Adjusted EPS Growth, calculated at the end of the
cumulative three-year performance period based on the percentile
ranking of our Adjusted EPS compound average annual growth rate
during the performance period relative to that of the companies
comprising the S&P 100 Index. The actual number of PSUs earned
will be based on (x) the three-year average ROIC measured against a
pre-established target approved by the Compensation and Human
Capital Committee in February of 2021, with achievement level
payouts ranging from 50% for threshold performance to 200% for
maximum performance (with 100% as the target and linear
interpolation between specified achievement levels) and (y)
Relative Adjusted EPS Growth over the three year period, with
payouts ranging from 50% for performance at the 25th percentile to
200% for performance at or above the 75th percentile, and setting
the target payout for performance at the median. For both metrics,
payouts are zero for performance below the threshold. |
|
|
|
After calculating the ROIC and Relative Adjusted EPS Growth
components, the Relative TSR Modifier is applied, which is based on
the percentile ranking of our TSR during such period relative to
that of the companies comprising the S&P 100 Index, as modified
to account for changes in the index companies such as due to merger
and acquisition activity. TSR will be determined based on the
average stock price of each company for the 20 trading days prior
to each of the first and last day of the performance period and
will be calculated assuming the reinvestment of dividends. The
actual number of PSUs earned will be determined after multiplying
the payout levels for the two primary performance metrics by 25%
for top quartile TSR performance or (25)% for bottom quartile
performance, with performance in between straight-line
interpolated. If our absolute TSR over the performance period is
negative, then, irrespective of our TSR percentile ranking, no
positive adjustment will be made to the payouts under the ROIC and
Relative Adjusted EPS Growth components. See “Compensation
Discussion and Analysis — Design and Structure of Executive
Compensation — Equity-Based Incentive Compensation” above for
additional information. Dividend equivalents accrue on shares
underlying PSUs, although the amounts will only be paid (without
interest) if and when the shares underlying PSUs vest. |
|
|
(3) |
The amounts in this column represent shares of our Class A
common stock underlying stock options granted under our 2003 Stock
Option Plan. Options become exercisable as follows: 40% of the
shares become exercisable on the second anniversary of the date of
grant and an additional 20% on each of the third, fourth and fifth
anniversaries of the date of grant. |
|
|
(4) |
The amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value
of PSUs and stock options computed in accordance with FASB ASC
Topic 718. These amounts do not necessarily correspond to the
actual value that may be realized by the NEOs. The grant date fair
value of PSUs was determined as described in footnote (2) to the
“Summary Compensation Table.” Amounts with respect to stock options
were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, based
upon the assumptions set forth in footnote (3) to the “Summary
Compensation Table.” |
|
|
(5) |
For 2021, Ms. Strong’s estimated future payouts in British
pounds sterling under our annual cash bonus plan at threshold,
target and maximum levels were £631,092, £4,507,800 and £8,339,431
respectively. The amount of British pounds sterling was converted
to U.S. dollars using the 2021 average of daily spot rates of £1 to
$1.3757. |
2022 Proxy Statement 49
Table of
Contents
Outstanding Equity Awards at
Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides information on the holdings of stock
options and stock awards by our NEOs as of December 31, 2021. This
table includes unexercised vested and unvested options to purchase
shares of Class A common stock (see columns (a), (b), (c) and (d)),
unvested RSUs with respect to shares of Class A common stock (see
columns (e) and (f)) and unvested PSUs with respect to shares of
Class A common stock (see columns (g) and (h)). The vesting
schedules for these grants are disclosed in the footnotes to this
table. The market value of stock awards is based on the closing
market price of a share of our Class A common stock as of December
31, 2021, or $50.33.
|
|
OPTION AWARDS |
|
STOCK AWARDS |
NAME |
|
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS
EXERCISABLE
(a) |
|
NUMBER
OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS
UNEXERCISABLE(2)
(b) |
|
OPTION
EXERCISE
PRICE
($)
(c) |
|
OPTION
EXPIRATION
DATE
(d) |
|
NUMBER OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED(3)(4)
(e) |
|
MARKET
VALUE OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED
($)
(f) |
|
EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR
OTHER
RIGHTS
THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED(3)(4)
(g) |
|
EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
MARKET VALUE
OR PAYOUT
VALUE OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE
NOT VESTED
($)
(h) |
Brian L. Roberts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,138,846 |
|
|
|
57,318,119 |
|
|
|
1,090,800 |
|
|
|
121,200 |
|
|
|
20.610 |
|
|
|
03/21/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820,250 |
|
|
|
144,750 |
|
|
|
25.000 |
|
|
|
03/20/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726,080 |
|
|
|
181,520 |
|
|
|
29.725 |
|
|
|
03/19/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
701,100 |
|
|
|
233,700 |
|
|
|
29.880 |
|
|
|
03/17/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461,280 |
|
|
|
307,520 |
|
|
|
37.460 |
|
|
|
03/16/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336,780 |
|
|
|
411,620 |
|
|
|
35.830 |
|
|
|
03/15/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,920 |
|
|
|
473,480 |
|
|
|
40.470 |
|
|
|
03/14/2029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,623,300 |
|
|
|
42.520 |
|
|
|
03/01/2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
879,200 |
|
|
|
54.450 |
|
|
|
02/28/2031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Cavanagh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
887,736 |
|
|
|
44,679,753 |
|
|
|
571,968 |
(1) |
|
|
142,992 |
|
|
|
28.320 |
|
|
|
05/14/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524,400 |
(1) |
|
|
174,800 |
|
|
|
29.880 |
|
|
|
03/17/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,820 |
(1) |
|
|
229,880 |
|
|
|
37.460 |
|
|
|
03/16/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251,865 |
(1) |
|
|
307,835 |
|
|
|
35.830 |
|
|
|
03/15/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,150 |
|
|
|
420,350 |
|
|
|
40.470 |
|
|
|
03/14/2029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,079,700 |
|
|
|
42.520 |
|
|
|
03/01/2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
655,100 |
|
|
|
54.450 |
|
|
|
02/28/2031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David N. Watson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,360 |
|
|
|
672,409 |
|
|
|
551,197 |
|
|
|
27,741,745 |
|
|
|
169,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
14.995 |
|
|
|
03/22/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,460 |
|
|
|
28,440 |
|
|
|
20.610 |
|
|
|
03/21/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,760 |
|
|
|
33,840 |
|
|
|
25.000 |
|
|
|
03/20/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,920 |
|
|
|
42,480 |
|
|
|
29.725 |
|
|
|
03/19/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,450 |
|
|
|
54,650 |
|
|
|
29.880 |
|
|
|
03/17/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,700 |
|
|
|
71,800 |
|
|
|
37.460 |
|
|
|
03/16/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,980 |
|
|
|
211,420 |
|
|
|
35.830 |
|
|
|
03/15/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,300 |
|
|
|
287,700 |
|
|
|
40.470 |
|
|
|
03/14/2029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
643,100 |
|
|
|
42.520 |
|
|
|
03/01/2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
435,200 |
|
|
|
54.450 |
|
|
|
02/28/2031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
Table of
Contents
|
|
OPTION
AWARDS |
|
STOCK
AWARDS |
NAME |
|
NUMBER
OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS
EXERCISABLE
(a) |
|
NUMBER
OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS
UNEXERCISABLE(2)
(b) |
|
OPTION
EXERCISE
PRICE
($)
(c) |
|
OPTION
EXPIRATION
DATE
(d) |
|
NUMBER
OF
SHARES
OR
UNITS
OF
STOCK
THAT
HAVE
NOT
VESTED(3)(4)
(e) |
|
MARKET
VALUE OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED
($)
(f) |
|
EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN
AWARDS:
NUMBER
OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS
OR
OTHER
RIGHTS
THAT
HAVE
NOT
VESTED(3)(4)
(g) |
|
EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
MARKET VALUE
OR PAYOUT
VALUE OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE
NOT VESTED
($)
(h) |
Jeffrey Shell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,701 |
|
|
|
7,484,121 |
|
|
|
330,711 |
|
|
|
16,644,685 |
|
|
|
90,912 |
|
|
|
212,128 |
|
|
|
44.090 |
|
|
|
12/19/2029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
574,300 |
|
|
|
42.520 |
|
|
|
03/01/2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
356,700 |
|
|
|
54.450 |
|
|
|
02/28/2031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dana Strong |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,890 |
|
|
|
4,675,154 |
|
|
|
158,341 |
|
|
|
7,969,303 |
|
|
|
36,528 |
|
|
|
133,936 |
|
|
|
31.810 |
|
|
|
04/26/2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,850 |
|
|
|
132,650 |
|
|
|
40.470 |
|
|
|
03/14/2029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
229,600 |
|
|
|
42.520 |
|
|
|
03/01/2030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
217,600 |
|
|
|
54.450 |
|
|
|
02/28/2031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Cavanagh assigned to a family trust a
portion of his vested stock options as follows: representing
321,732 shares from the stock options expiring on May 14, 2025;
representing 419,520 shares from the stock options expiring on
March 17, 2026; representing 258,615 shares from the stock options
expiring on March 16, 2027 and representing 167,910 shares from the
stock options expiring on March 15, 2028. |
|
|
(2) |
The expiration date occurs one day prior to the tenth
anniversary of the grant date. Stock options that expire on or
prior to March 1, 2030 have the following vesting schedule: 30%,
15%, 15%, 15%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5% and 5% on the second, third, fourth,
fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and nine and a half
anniversaries of the grant date, respectively. Stock options that
expire on February 28, 2031 have the following vesting schedule:
40%, 20%, 20% and 20% on the second, third, fourth and fifth
anniversaries of the grant date, respectively. |
|
|
(3) |
Our equity awards contain provisions for continued vesting upon
certain employees attaining retirement eligible status. This table
does not reflect accelerated vesting resulting from the attainment
of retirement eligible status. See “Potential Payments upon
Termination or Change in Control” for additional information. |
|
|
(4) |
The number of shares underlying each outstanding stock
unit(a) for the NEOs that remain subject to vesting are
as follows: |
|
|
GRANT
DATE |
|
BRIAN
L.
ROBERTS |
|
MICHAEL
J.
CAVANAGH |
|
DAVID
N.
WATSON |
|
JEFFREY
SHELL |
|
DANA
STRONG |
03/01/2017 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
26,608 |
|
|
|
— |
|
03/17/2017 |
|
|
71,400 |
(b) |
|
|
53,400 |
(b) |
|
|
13,360 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
04/14/2017 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
33,660 |
(b) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
03/01/2018 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
37,631 |
|
|
|
— |
|
03/16/2018 |
|
|
102,643 |
(c) |
|
|
76,725 |
(c) |
|
|
52,800 |
(c) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
04/27/2018 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
25,938 |
|
02/01/2019 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13,591 |
(d) |
03/01/2019 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
44,758 |
|
|
|
— |
|
03/15/2019 |
|
|
115,674 |
(e) |
|
|
145,950 |
(e) |
|
|
70,262 |
(e) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
25,970 |
|
10/11/2019 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,977 |
(f) |
12/20/2019 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
39,704 |
|
|
|
— |
|
03/02/2020 |
|
|
264,879 |
(g) |
|
|
176,161 |
(g) |
|
|
104,975 |
(g) |
|
|
93,711 |
(g) |
|
|
30,005 |
|
03/01/2021 |
|
|
584,250 |
(h) |
|
|
435,500 |
(h) |
|
|
289,500 |
(h) |
|
|
237,000 |
(h) |
|
|
144,750 |
(h) |
2022 Proxy Statement 51
Table of
Contents
(a) |
Except as otherwise described in footnotes
below, all stock units granted as of the respective grant date had
the following vesting schedule: 15%, 15%, 15%, 15% and 40% on the
13-month, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the
grant date, respectively, with Mr. Shell’s first vesting date for
his 2017 grant being twelve months after the grant date. |
|
|
(b) |
Reflects the number of shares underlying PSUs that, as of
December 31, 2021, has been achieved at maximum attainment of
the performance condition, resulting in 125% vesting of the award.
In early 2022, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee
certified performance for the fifth tranche of PSUs, resulting in
attainment of the award at the maximum achievement of 125%. |
|
|
(c) |
Reflects the number of shares underlying PSUs that, as of
December 31, 2021, has been achieved at maximum attainment of the
performance condition, resulting in 125% vesting of the award. In
early 2022, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee certified
performance for the fourth tranche of PSUs, resulting in attainment
of the award at the maximum achievement of 125% of the award.
Because the performance condition for the fourth tranche was
achieved at 125% (the maximum performance achievement), all
remaining tranches of the PSUs will also be earned at 125% of the
target shares. |
|
|
(d) |
In late 2021, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee
certified performance for the third tranche of PSUs, resulting in
attainment of 100% achievement of the award. The stock units vest
one-third on the 13-month, second and third anniversaries of the
grant date, respectively. |
|
|
(e) |
Reflects the number of shares underlying PSUs that, as of
December 31, 2021, has been achieved at maximum attainment of the
performance condition, resulting in 125% vesting of the award. In
early 2022, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee certified
performance for the third tranche of PSUs, resulting in maximum
attainment of 125% of the award. Because the performance condition
for the third tranche was achieved at 125% (the maximum performance
achievement), all remaining tranches of the PSUs will also be
earned at 125% of the target shares. |
|
|
(f) |
The stock units vest one-third on the 13-month, second and
third anniversaries of the grant date, respectively. |
|
|
(g) |
Reflects the number of shares underlying PSUs that, as of
December 31, 2021, has been achieved at maximum attainment of the
performance condition, resulting in 125% vesting of the award. In
early 2022, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee certified
performance for the second tranche of PSUs, resulting in maximum
attainment of 125% of the award. Because the performance condition
for the second tranche was achieved at 125% (the maximum
performance achievement), all remaining tranches of the PSUs will
also be earned at 125% of the target shares. The PSUs granted to
Mr. Shell had the following vesting schedule: 15%, 15%, 15%, 15%
and 40% on the first, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries
of the grant date, respectively. |
|
|
(h) |
Reflects the number of shares underlying PSUs that, as of
December 31, 2021, may be achieved assuming maximum attainment of
the performance condition, which would result in 250% vesting of
the award. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee will
certify actual performance achievement of the PSUs in early 2024.
The PSUs vest 100% on the 3-year anniversary of the date of
grant. |
Option Exercises and
Stock Vested
The following table provides information, for each of our NEOs, on
the number of options exercised and the value realized upon such
exercise, and the number of shares of Class A common stock
resulting from the vesting of stock awards and the value realized
before payment of any applicable withholding tax during 2021.
|
|
OPTION
AWARDS |
|
STOCK
AWARDS |
NAME |
|
NUMBER
OF
SHARES
ACQUIRED ON
EXERCISE |
|
VALUE
REALIZED ON
EXERCISE
($) |
|
NUMBER
OF
SHARES
ACQUIRED
ON VESTING |
|
VALUE
REALIZED ON
VESTING
($) |
Brian L. Roberts |
|
|
2,988,000 |
|
|
|
112,071,190 |
|
|
|
68,608 |
(1) |
|
|
3,958,652 |
|
Michael J. Cavanagh |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
115,091 |
(1) |
|
|
6,540,905 |
|
David N. Watson |
|
|
409,314 |
|
|
|
16,460,024 |
|
|
|
56,349 |
|
|
|
3,177,501 |
|
Jeffrey Shell |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
68,088 |
|
|
|
3,655,821 |
|
Dana Strong |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
42,502 |
(1) |
|
|
2,248,981 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Roberts deferred the receipt of shares
relating to 17,691, 21,637 and 21,879 of these PSUs that vested on
March 15, 2021, March 16, 2021 and March 17, 2021, respectively.
Mr. Cavanagh deferred the receipt of shares relating to 47,789 of
these PSUs that vested on March 18, 2021. The value of the stock
units realized on vesting is based on the value of a share of Class
A common stock on the vesting date, regardless of whether the
receipt of the shares underlying the PSUs had been deferred. The
actual value of the stock units realized upon settlement may be
different than the value reflected in this table. The value
realized on vesting also is reflected in the “Executive
Contributions in Last FY” column of the “Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation in and as of Fiscal Year-End” table immediately
below. |
52
Table of
Contents
Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation in and as of Fiscal Year-End
The table below provides information on the nonqualified deferred
compensation of our NEOs in and as of the end of
2021.(1)
NAME |
|
TYPE OF
INVESTMENT
FUND |
|
EXECUTIVE
CONTRIBUTIONS
IN LAST FY(2)
($) |
|
AGGREGATE
EARNINGS IN
LAST FY(3)
($) |
|
AGGREGATE
WITHDRAWALS/
DISTRIBUTIONS
($) |
|
AGGREGATE
BALANCE AT
LAST FYE(4)
($) |
Brian L. Roberts |
|
Income Fund |
|
|
— |
(5) |
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
(1,465,395 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Market Funds |
|
|
11,269,919 |
(5) |
|
|
10,484,354 |
(5) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
139,390,356 |
|
Michael J. Cavanagh |
|
Income Fund |
|
|
— |
(5) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Market Funds |
|
|
2,669,971 |
(5) |
|
|
2,608,840 |
(5) |
|
|
(14,393,021 |
) |
|
|
70,668,620 |
|
David N. Watson |
|
Income Fund |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
662,811 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Market Funds |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,360,173 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
39,324,396 |
|
Jeffrey Shell |
|
Income Fund |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
62,676 |
|
|
|
(4,507,626 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Market Funds |
|
|
4,186,131 |
|
|
|
(361,695 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,049,434 |
|
Dana Strong |
|
Income Fund |
|
|
69,902 |
|
|
|
29,517 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Market Funds |
|
|
896,003 |
(5) |
|
|
135,548 |
(5) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,212,982 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Amounts in this table have been deferred
under our deferred compensation plans, except for deferrals of
stock units with respect to shares of Class A common stock under
our restricted stock plan, as more fully described in footnote (5)
to this table. Eligible employees and directors may participate in
these plans. Since March 1, 2021, amounts credited to an NEO’s
account must be invested notionally in a third-party mutual or
exchange fund or our company’s common stock fund. Before March
2021, NEOs were permitted to invest amounts instead in an income
fund with an interest crediting rate of 9%, or 12% for certain
grandfathered amounts. |
|
|
|
Under our restricted stock plan, eligible employees may defer
the receipt of shares that may, subject to an award of stock units,
vest in the future. Upon vesting, deferred stock units are invested
in our company stock fund. An employee who has elected to defer
stock units may also make a “diversification election” of the
shares subject to such stock units (or such greater percentage
authorized by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee) to have
the value of such stock units transferred to our deferred
compensation plans. |
|
|
|
During 2021, (i) the annual rates of return under the
third-party mutual or exchange funds were as follows: 5.93%, -1.7%,
28.69%, 12.45%, 25.44%, -10.36%, 7.76%, 1.36% and 11.50%, and (ii)
the annual rate of return under our company stock fund was
-2.22%. |
|
|
(2) |
These amounts (other than amounts related to deferrals of PSUs)
are reported as compensation in the “Summary Compensation Table”
above under the columns “Salary” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation.” |
|
|
(3) |
The portion of these amounts that represents interest earned in
excess of 120% of the long-term applicable federal rate is reported
as compensation in the “Summary Compensation Table” above under the
column “Change in Pension Value and Earnings on Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation.” |
|
|
(4) |
All amounts contributed in prior years under our deferred
compensation plans have been reported in the Summary Compensation
Table in previously filed proxy statements in the year earned to
the extent an individual was an NEO for purposes of the SEC’s
executive compensation disclosure. The grant date fair value of
stock units deferred under our restricted stock plan has been
reported in the year granted in the Summary Compensation Table in
previously filed proxy statements. Fiscal year-end balances for
each fund include net transfers between funds that occurred during
the year. |
|
|
(5) |
Pursuant to our restricted stock plan, as described in footnote
(1) to this table, (i) Mr. Roberts deferred the settlement of
17,691 PSUs, 21,637 PSUs and 21,879 PSUs that vested on March 15,
2021, March 16, 2021 and March 17, 2021, respectively, and (ii) Mr.
Cavanagh deferred the settlement of 47,789 PSUs that vested on
March 18, 2021. The amounts shown in the “Market Funds” row of the
“Executive Contributions in Last FY” column reflect the aggregate
value of (i) stock units that were deferred in 2021 as of their
respective vesting dates and (ii) amounts deemed invested in
third-party mutual or exchange funds under our deferred
compensation plans; the amounts shown in the “Market Funds” row of
the “Aggregate Earnings in Last FY” column reflect the value of any
aggregate gain or loss in 2021. |
Agreements with Our Named
Executive Officers
Each of our NEOs has an employment agreement with us that has the
following key provisions. Mr. Roberts’ agreement was effective as
of August 1, 2017 and provides for an initial term of employment
through July 31, 2020, which term will be extended automatically by
one additional day for each day that elapses after August 1, 2017
(so that the term of the agreement will always be three years),
unless otherwise terminated by either party in accordance with the
employment agreement. Mr. Cavanagh’s agreement was entered into on
December 21, 2018 and secures his employment through December 31,
2023. Mr. Watson’s agreement was entered into on March 1, 2018 and,
as amended, secures his employment through June 30, 2025. Mr.
Shell’s agreement was entered into on February 19, 2020 and secures
his employment through December 31, 2024. Ms. Strong’s agreement
was entered into on January 1, 2021 and secures her employment
through December 31, 2025.
2022 Proxy Statement 53
Table of
Contents
Each of the employment agreements provides for a base salary either
as specified in the agreement or otherwise then in effect. An NEO’s
salary may not be reduced, except under an overall plan to reduce
the salary on a basis consistent with other senior executives at
their respective levels. The NEOs also are eligible to receive an
annual performance bonus, payable in cash, of a percentage of their
respective base salaries for the applicable year. Each NEO’s target
bonus opportunity may not be less than 300% of their respective
base salaries if all performance targets are achieved. Our NEOs are
also entitled to receive certain severance benefits under their
respective agreements in the event of a qualifying termination of
employment as described under the “Potential Payments upon
Termination or Change in Control” table below.
Under the agreements, each NEO has agreed not to compete with us
during their employment and, in the event their employment
terminates other than by us without cause or by them with good
reason, for one year after termination of their employment.
Each of our NEOs has agreed not to solicit our employees or
customers for one year after termination of their employment and is
subject to confidentiality covenants. Each has agreed to maintain
the confidentiality of our information and not to use such
information, except for our benefit, at all times during and after
their employment with us.
Potential Payments upon
Termination or Change in Control
The table below describes the payments and benefits to which each
of our NEOs would have been entitled (i) had their employment
terminated on December 31, 2021 (a) by us without cause or by them
with good reason, (b) because of their death, (c) due to their
disability or (d) upon their retirement or (ii) upon a change in
control. In addition to the specific payments and benefits
described below for each NEO, our NEOs also would have been
entitled to receive any benefits due under the terms of our benefit
plans and programs, including our deferred compensation plans
described in further detail in the “Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation in and as of Fiscal Year-End” table above. All amounts
are estimates only, and actual amounts will vary depending upon the
facts and circumstances applicable at the time of the triggering
event.
NAME |
|
BASE
SALARY
CONTINUATION
($) |
|
ANNUAL
CASH BONUS
CONTINUATION
($) |
|
ACCRUED
ANNUAL CASH
BONUS
($) |
|
ACCELERATION/
CONTINUED
VESTING &
EXERCISABILITY
OF UNVESTED
STOCK
OPTIONS(1)
($) |
|
ACCELERATION/
CONTINUED
VESTING OF
UNVESTED
STOCK UNITS(1)
($) |
|
HEALTH
BENEFIT
CONTINUATION
($) |
|
TOTAL
($) |
Brian L. Roberts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without Cause/With Good Reason(2) |
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
|
|
22,500,000 |
|
|
|
9,748,245 |
|
|
|
43,060,724 |
|
|
|
34,852,317 |
|
|
|
35,176 |
|
|
|
117,696,462 |
|
Death(3) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,748,245 |
|
|
|
43,060,724 |
|
|
|
34,852,317 |
|
|
|
211,056 |
|
|
|
87,872,342 |
|
Disability(4) |
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
|
|
22,500,000 |
|
|
|
9,748,245 |
|
|
|
43,060,724 |
|
|
|
34,852,317 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
117,661,286 |
|
Retirement(5) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
43,060,724 |
|
|
|
34,852,317 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
77,913,041 |
|
Change in Control(6) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Michael J. Cavanagh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without Cause/With Good Reason(7) |
|
|
4,600,000 |
|
|
|
6,900,000 |
|
|
|
6,900,000 |
|
|
|
10,106,156 |
|
|
|
5,885,238 |
|
|
|
30,096 |
|
|
|
34,421,490 |
|
Death/Disability(8) |
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,900,000 |
|
|
|
26,721,185 |
|
|
|
27,544,502 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
61,740,687 |
|
Retirement(5) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Change in Control(6) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
David N. Watson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without Cause/With Good Reason(7) |
|
|
4,600,000 |
|
|
|
6,900,000 |
|
|
|
6,744,231 |
|
|
|
4,870,550 |
|
|
|
4,007,728 |
|
|
|
23,451 |
|
|
|
27,145,960 |
|
Death/Disability(8) |
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,744,231 |
|
|
|
15,544,286 |
|
|
|
17,214,018 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
40,077,535 |
|
Retirement(5) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15,544,286 |
|
|
|
17,214,018 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
32,758,304 |
|
Change in Control(6) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
54
Table of
Contents
NAME |
|
BASE
SALARY
CONTINUATION
($) |
|
ANNUAL
CASH BONUS
CONTINUATION
($) |
|
ACCRUED
ANNUAL CASH
BONUS
($) |
|
ACCELERATION/
CONTINUED
VESTING &
EXERCISABILITY
OF UNVESTED
STOCK
OPTIONS(1)
($) |
|
ACCELERATION/
CONTINUED
VESTING OF
UNVESTED
STOCK UNITS(1)
($) |
|
HEALTH
BENEFIT
CONTINUATION
($) |
|
TOTAL
($) |
Jeffrey Shell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without Cause/With Good Reason(7) |
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,629,230 |
|
|
|
3,432,506 |
|
|
|
29,803 |
|
|
|
25,091,539 |
|
Death/Disability(8) |
|
|
625,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
|
|
5,808,962 |
|
|
|
16,028,645 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
29,962,607 |
|
Retirement(5) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Change in Control(6) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Dana Strong |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without Cause/With Good Reason(7) |
|
4,134,254 |
|
|
|
6,201,380 |
|
|
|
6,201,380 |
|
|
|
1,494,722 |
|
|
|
2,139,126 |
|
|
|
60,378 |
|
|
|
20,231,240 |
|
Death/Disability(8) |
|
|
516,782 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,201,380 |
|
|
|
5,581,600 |
|
|
|
8,273,296 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
20,573,058 |
|
Retirement(5) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Change in Control(6) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1) |
Based on the closing market price of a share
of our Class A common stock as of December 31, 2021 ($50.33),
minus, in the case of stock options, the exercise price. PSUs are
also based on the target vesting. |
|
|
(2) |
Mr. Roberts’ termination without cause or with good reason
would entitle him to (i) payment of his base salary on a monthly
basis for three years after the termination date, (ii) payment of
his annual cash bonus (appropriately prorated for partial calendar
years), assuming full achievement of performance goals, on an
annual basis for three years and (iii) vesting of his unvested
stock options and stock units in accordance with their terms as if
his employment had continued. Mr. Roberts’ receipt of the payments
and benefits is subject to his execution of our standard agreement
containing certain mutual releases. Mr. Roberts is also entitled to
receive a prorated annual cash bonus for the year of his
termination, assuming full achievement of the performance goals,
and to continued health and welfare benefits for three years after
the termination date. |
|
|
(3) |
Upon Mr. Roberts’ death, his unvested stock options and stock
units will vest in full and his options will remain exercisable for
the remainder of their terms. His spouse or his or her estate will
receive payment of his annual cash bonus, prorated to reflect the
number of days he was employed during the year of his death
(assuming full achievement of the performance goals), and his
spouse will receive health and welfare benefits during her
lifetime. |
|
|
(4) |
If Mr. Roberts’ employment is terminated by reason of his
disability, we must continue to pay his base salary on a monthly
basis for three years, his annual cash bonus (appropriately
prorated for partial calendar years), assuming full achievement of
performance goals, on an annual basis for three years, and his
unvested stock options and stock units will vest in full and his
options will remain exercisable for the remainder of their term. In
the event of Mr. Roberts’ death prior to the end of such three-year
period, no remaining payments will be made. Mr. Roberts is also
entitled to receive a prorated annual cash bonus for the year of
his termination, assuming full achievement of the performance
goals. |
|
|
(5) |
Certain senior executives, including our NEOs, are entitled to
continued vesting on retirement. For stock option awards granted
before 2021, NEOs who reach the age of 62 are entitled to the
continued vesting and exercisability of options following
termination for (a) 36 and 39 months, respectively, with 10 years
of service, (b) 60 and 63 months, respectively, with 15 years of
service and (c) 114 and 117 months, respectively, with 20 years of
service, provided that no option will be exercisable after the 10th
anniversary of the date of grant. For stock units granted before
2021, NEOs who reach the age of 62 are entitled to the continued
vesting of stock units following termination for (x) 36 months with
10 years of service, (y) 48 months with 15 years of service and (z)
60 months with 20 years of service. For stock option and PSU awards
granted in 2021, NEOs qualify for continued vesting on retirement
when the sum of the NEO’s age and completed years of service equals
or exceeds 70 (provided that the NEO has reached age 62 and
completed 5 years of service). |
|
|
(6) |
None of our NEOs’ employment agreements provides for the
automatic accelerated vesting of equity awards in connection with a
change in control (a “single trigger”), and none of our NEOs’
employment agreements, other than Mr. Roberts’, provides for the
automatic accelerated vesting of equity awards upon the occurrence
of one or more specified events that may follow a change in
control, such as a termination of employment (a “double trigger”).
Under Mr. Roberts’ employment agreement, if we were to terminate
Mr. Roberts’ employment following a change in control transaction,
it would be treated as a termination without cause and he would be
entitled to the same amounts set forth in the “Without Cause/With
Good Reason” category, as described in footnote (2) to this
table. |
2022 Proxy Statement 55
Table of
Contents
(7) |
If we terminate such
executive’s employment without cause or the executive terminates
with good reason, they will receive their then-current base salary
for a period of 24 months. Messrs. Cavanagh and Watson are entitled
to receive continued health benefits for a period of 24 months, and
Mr. Shell and Ms. Strong are entitled to receive continued health
benefits for a period of 18 months. If the executive becomes
reemployed, these payments will be reduced by the amount of any
compensation earned or received by the executive in respect of such
period and we will stop providing health and welfare benefits. Such
executive will receive the full (non-prorated) amount of the
current year’s annual cash bonus (assuming full achievement of
performance goals) and the following year’s target annual cash
bonus (prorated for time employed during the year of termination
and assuming full achievement of performance goals). Stock options
and stock units will continue to vest in accordance with their
respective terms for 12 months following termination, and vested
stock options will remain exercisable for a period equal to the
lesser of 15 months or the end of the stock options’ term. Mr.
Roberts and Mr. Watson, who are over the age of 62, are entitled to
receive retirement-related compensation as set forth in footnote
(5) to this table. The executives’ receipt of the payments and
benefits described above are subject to execution of our standard
agreement containing certain mutual releases. |
|
|
(8) |
If such executive’s
employment terminates due to his death or disability, the executive
or his or her estate will receive three months of base salary and
payment of annual cash bonus, prorated for time employed during the
year of such termination (assuming full achievement of performance
goals), and stock options and stock units will fully vest, with
stock options remaining exercisable for the remainder of their
terms. |
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes our equity plan information as of
December 31, 2021.
PLAN
CATEGORY |
|
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES TO
BE ISSUED UPON EXERCISE
OF OUTSTANDING OPTIONS,
WARRANTS AND RIGHTS(1)
(a) |
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICE
OF OUTSTANDING
OPTIONS, WARRANTS
AND RIGHTS(2)
($)
(b) |
|
NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
REMAINING AVAILABLE FOR
FUTURE ISSUANCE UNDER
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
EXCLUDING SECURITIES
REFLECTED IN COLUMN (A)(3)
(c) |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
|
256,954,530 |
|
|
|
40.44 |
|
|
|
488,693,199 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security
holders |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
|
256,954,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488,693,199 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes shares of Class A common stock
under the following plans: 2003 Stock Option Plan, 2002 Restricted
Stock Plan (under which RSUs and PSUs have been granted), Comcast
Corporation 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Comcast-NBCUniversal
2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 2019 Omnibus Sharesave Plan.
Also includes our 2002 and 2005 Deferred Compensation Plans (under
which shares of Class A common stock have been credited to
participants’ accounts). |
|
|
(2) |
The weighted-average exercise price only reflects stock options
under our 2003 Stock Option Plan. |
|
|
(3) |
The number of shares available for issuance includes the
following number of shares of Class A common stock: 384,544,616
shares available for issuance under the 2003 Stock Option Plan;
74,633,199 shares available for issuance under the 2002 Restricted
Stock Plan; 5,627,980 shares available for issuance under the 2019
Omnibus Sharesave Plan; 1,011,970 shares that were issued in
connection with the fourth quarter 2021 purchase period under the
Comcast Corporation 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and
12,912,446 shares available for issuance under the Comcast
Corporation 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; and 280,276 shares
that were issued in connection with the fourth quarter 2021
purchase period under the Comcast-NBCUniversal 2011 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan and 9,682,712 shares available for issuance under the
Comcast-NBCUniversal 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
56
Table of
Contents
CEO
Pay Ratio
We are
required under SEC rules to provide a pay ratio comparing Mr.
Roberts’ 2021 compensation to our median employee’s 2021
compensation (excluding Mr. Roberts). To identify the median
employee, we engaged an unaffiliated third-party advisory services
firm to conduct a statistical sampling of approximately 192,392
full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary employees as of
December 31, 2021 (which included approximately 61,189 non-U.S.
employees) based on comparisons of base wages.
All of
our part-time, seasonal and temporary employees as of December 31,
2021, including in our theme park and entertainment production
businesses, were required to be taken into account for purposes of
identifying our median employee under SEC rules. SEC rules do not
permit us to annualize the compensation paid to these workers as if
they were full-time employees, which has the effect of reducing the
level of our median employee’s total compensation relative to what
it would have been had the rules permitted us to annualize
compensation across our entire workforce or to use only full-time
U.S. employees. As a result, the impact of this rule may be
different for us than some companies in our peer groups given the
composition of our workforce across our uniquely diversified
company, and year-over-year comparisons may not be meaningful. We
believe putting into context how our median employee was identified
highlights why that employee’s compensation and the resulting pay
ratio, and year-over-year changes thereto, should not be compared
on an “apples-to-apples” basis.
We have
estimated that our pay ratio for 2021 is 405 to 1, calculated by
dividing Mr. Roberts’ 2021 total compensation set forth in the
Summary Compensation Table, adjusted as described below
($33,993,040), by $83,840, which represents the annual total
compensation of our median employee. Our median employee’s annual
total compensation was determined using the same methodology we
used to determine the annual total compensation of our NEOs, which,
along with Mr. Roberts’ compensation, was then adjusted to include
the cost to the Company of specified employee benefits provided on
a non-discriminatory basis, including group health and welfare
benefits and the value of courtesy cable services.
As
permitted under SEC rules, we adjusted our total employee
population for purposes of identifying our median employee by
excluding approximately 1.6% of our employee population as follows
(all amounts are approximate): 160 in Brazil; 80 in Canada; 1700 in
India; 920 in Ireland; 205 in Mexico; and 60 in Russia.
2022
Proxy Statement 57
Table of
Contents
Audit Committee Matters
Proposal
3: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
|
 |
Our Board unanimously
recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” ratification of the appointment
of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent
auditors.
|
Selection
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment,
compensation, retention and oversight of our independent auditors,
Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”). Deloitte, together
with its predecessors, has served as our independent auditors since
1963. The lead engagement partner from Deloitte is required to be
rotated every five years. The process for selection of a new lead
engagement partner includes a meeting between the Chair of the
Audit Committee and the candidate for this role, as well as
discussion by the full Audit Committee and meetings with senior
management.
Each
year, the Audit Committee, along with our management and internal
auditors, reviews Deloitte’s performance as part of the Audit
Committee’s consideration of whether to reappoint the firm as our
independent auditors. As part of this review, the Audit Committee
considers (i) the continued independence of Deloitte, (ii) its
quality of service provided on prior audits, (iii) evaluations of
Deloitte by our management and internal auditors, (iv) Deloitte’s
effectiveness of communications and working relationships with the
Audit Committee and our management and internal auditors, (v) the
length of time Deloitte has served as our independent auditors and
(vi) the quality and depth of Deloitte and the audit team’s
expertise and experience in our industries in light of the breadth,
complexity and global reach of our businesses.
Following
the Audit Committee’s review of Deloitte’s performance, the Audit
Committee appointed Deloitte to serve as our independent auditors
for the year ending December 31, 2022. The Audit Committee and our
Board recommend that you ratify this appointment, although your
ratification is not required. A partner of Deloitte will be present
at the annual meeting and will be available to respond to
appropriate questions.
Fees
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Set
forth below are the fees paid or accrued for the services of
Deloitte, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and their
respective affiliates in 2021 and 2020.
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
($ IN MILLIONS) |
Audit
fees |
25.1 |
|
21.5 |
Audit-related
fees |
1.1 |
|
1.2 |
Tax
fees |
1.1 |
|
1.6 |
All other
fees |
— |
|
— |
Total |
27.4 |
|
24.3 |
Audit
fees consisted of fees paid or accrued for services rendered to us
and our subsidiaries for the audits of our annual financial
statements, audits of our internal control over financial reporting
(as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002),
reviews of our quarterly financial statements and audit services
provided in connection with other statutory, regulatory or
contractual requirements.
Audit-related
fees consisted of fees paid or accrued for financial due diligence
services and attestation services related to contractual and
regulatory compliance.
58
Table of
Contents
Tax
fees consisted of fees paid or accrued for domestic and foreign tax
compliance services, including review of tax returns and tax
examination assistance. There were no fees paid or accrued in 2021
and 2020 for tax planning.
Other
fees included fees paid or accrued for subscription
services.
Preapproval
Policy of Audit Committee of Services Performed by Independent
Auditors
The
Audit Committee’s policy requires that the Committee preapprove all
audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditors
to assure that the services do not impair the auditors’
independence. Unless a type of service has received general
preapproval, it requires separate preapproval by the Audit
Committee. Even if a service has received general preapproval, if
the fee associated with the service exceeds $1 million in a single
engagement or series of related engagements, it requires separate
preapproval. The Audit Committee has delegated its preapproval
authority to its Chair.
Report of the Audit Committee
The
Audit Committee (as used in this section, “we” or “our”) is
composed solely of independent directors meeting the requirements
of the applicable rules of the SEC and The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC.
Each member also is financially literate for audit committee
purposes under the Nasdaq rules, and the Board has concluded that
Jeffrey A. Honickman and Maritza G. Montiel qualify as audit
committee financial experts. The key responsibilities of our
committee are set forth in our charter, which was adopted by us and
approved by the Board and is posted under “Corporate Governance” in
the Investors section of Comcast’s website at www.cmcsa.com.
We
serve in an oversight capacity and are not intended to be part of
Comcast’s operational or managerial decision-making process.
Comcast’s management is responsible for the preparation, integrity
and fair presentation of information in Comcast’s consolidated
financial statements, the financial reporting process and internal
control over financial reporting. Deloitte, Comcast’s independent
auditors, is responsible for auditing Comcast’s consolidated
financial statements and internal control over financial reporting.
Our principal purpose is to monitor these processes.
In this
context, at each regularly scheduled in-person meeting, we met and
held discussions with management, Comcast’s internal auditors and
the independent auditors. Management represented to us that
Comcast’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applied on
a consistent basis.
Prior
to their issuance, we reviewed and discussed the quarterly and
annual earnings press releases, consolidated financial statements
and disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (including the
presentation of non-GAAP financial information and critical
accounting judgments and estimates) with management, Comcast’s
internal auditors and the independent auditors. We also reviewed
Comcast’s policies and practices with respect to financial risk
assessment, as well as its processes and practices with respect to
enterprise risk assessment and management. We discussed with the
independent auditors critical audit matters identified during the
course of the audit and other matters required to be discussed by
applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and
SEC rules.
We
discussed with the independent auditors the overall scope and plans
for their audit and approved the terms of their engagement letter.
We also reviewed Comcast’s internal audit plan. We met with the
independent auditors and with Comcast’s internal auditors, in each
case with and without other members of management present, to
discuss the results of their respective examinations, the
evaluations of Comcast’s internal controls and the overall quality
and integrity of Comcast’s financial reporting. Among other things,
in our discussions with the independent auditors, we sought their
perspectives on the appropriateness of the accounting principles
selected by management and their assessment of risk in financial
reporting.
Additionally,
we reviewed the performance, responsibilities, budget and staffing
of Comcast’s internal auditors. We also have established, and
oversaw compliance with, procedures for Comcast’s receipt,
retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting,
internal accounting controls or auditing matters and its employees’
confidential and anonymous submissions of concerns regarding
questionable accounting or auditing matters.
2022
Proxy Statement 59
Table of
Contents
We
discussed with the independent auditors the auditors’ independence
from Comcast and its management, including the matters required to
be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and SEC.
We also reviewed Comcast’s hiring policies and practices with
respect to current and former employees of the independent
auditors. We preapproved, in accordance with our preapproval policy
described above, all services provided by the independent auditors
and considered whether their provision of such services to Comcast
is compatible with maintaining the auditors’
independence.
Based
on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommended to
the Board, and the Board approved, that the audited consolidated
financial statements be included in Comcast’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the
SEC.
In
addition, as in prior years, we, along with Comcast’s management
and internal auditors, reviewed Deloitte’s performance as part of
our consideration of whether to appoint the firm as independent
auditors for 2022 and recommend that shareholders ratify this
appointment. As part of this review, we considered the continued
independence of Deloitte, the quality of service provided on prior
audits, the results of an evaluation of Deloitte by Comcast’s
management and internal auditors and Deloitte’s effectiveness of
communications and working relationships with us, management and
the internal auditors. We also considered the period of time that
Deloitte has served as Comcast’s independent auditors and evaluated
the quality and depth of the firm and the audit team’s expertise
and experience in our industries in light of the breadth,
complexity and global reach of Comcast’s businesses. Following this
review, we have appointed Deloitte as Comcast’s independent
auditors for 2022 and are recommending that Comcast’s shareholders
ratify this appointment.
Members
of the Audit Committee
Jeffrey
A. Honickman (Chair)
Naomi M. Bergman
Maritza G. Montiel
Asuka Nakahara
60
Table of
Contents
Shareholder Proposals
We
received the following shareholder proposals. To be voted upon at
our 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, the proponent of each
proposal, or a representative of the proponent qualified under
Pennsylvania law, must be present at the meeting to present the
proposal. We provide the name and address of each proponent,
including any co-filer(s), below. We will promptly supply the
number of shares of our Class A common stock or, if not available,
the market value of our Class A common stock held by any proponent
(including any co-filer(s)), upon oral or written request to the
Secretary.
Other
than adding a brief title, we have included the text of each
proposal and the shareholder’s supporting statement. Following each
proposal, we explain why our Board recommends a vote AGAINST
it.
Proposal
4: SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL TO REPORT ON
CHARITABLE DONATIONS
|
 |
Our Board unanimously
recommends that shareholders vote “AGAINST” this shareholder
proposal.
|
The
following proposal and supporting statement were submitted by
National Legal and Policy Center, 107 Park Washington Court, Falls
Church, VA 22046.
Supporting
Statement
Request
for Charitable Donation Disclosure
RESOLVED:
The shareholders request that Comcast Corporation (“Company”)
provide a report, published on the company’s website and updated
semi-annually – and omitting proprietary information and at
reasonable cost – that discloses, itemizes and quantifies all
Company charitable donations, aggregated by recipient name &
address each year for contributions that exceed $999
annually.
This
report shall include:
|
1. |
Monetary
and non-monetary contributions made to non-profit organizations
operating under Section 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) of the Internal
Revenue Code, and any other public or private charitable
organization; |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Policies
and procedures for charitable contributions (both direct and
indirect) made with corporate assets; |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Rationale
for each of the charitable contributions. |
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT: Comcast Corporation’s assets belong to its shareholders.
The expenditure or distribution of corporate assets, including
charitable contributions, should be consistent with shareholder
interests. Accordingly, the Company’s policies and procedures for
charitable contributions should be disclosed to
shareholders.
Company
executives exercise wide discretion over the use of corporate
assets for charitable purposes. Absent a system of transparency and
accountability for charitable contributions, Company executives may
use Company assets for objectives that are not shared by and may be
inimical to the interests of the Company and its
shareholders.
Current
disclosure is insufficient to allow the Company’s Board, its
shareholders, and its current and prospective customers to fully
evaluate the charitable use of corporate assets.
There
is currently no single source providing shareholders the
information sought by this resolution.
Company
Response to Shareholder Proposal
Comcast
strives to positively affect the communities where our employees,
customers and audiences live and work through charitable giving,
reporting on this community impact giving annually. As we have
outlined in our 2021 Impact Report, as a company uniquely
positioned to inform, entertain and empower, we seek to bring
together diverse communities and inspire our employees, customers
and audiences to make a positive social impact.
2022
Proxy Statement 61
Table of
Contents
For
example, as set forth in our 2021 Impact
Report(1):
|
● |
In
2020, we invested $496 million in the communities where we operate
through cash and in-kind donations, including donations of $31
million to organizations led by and serving people of color and $5
million to organizations led by and serving women. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Comcast
also empowers employees to give back to their communities by
matching their contributions to eligible, tax-exempt charitable
organizations dollar-for-dollar up to $1,000 annually. In 2020,
6,400 employees participated in the matching gift program,
generating over $5 million donated to approximately 5,600
non-profit organizations recommended by employees. |
On top
of our existing community impact giving efforts, in 2020, we
announced an incremental multi-year $100 million commitment to help
advance social justice and equality. We provided an update in 2021
on our progress toward this initiative(2), which we are
well on track to fulfill by the end of 2022.
In
addition, the Comcast NBCUniversal Foundation is committed to
supporting the interests and needs of our diverse communities, and
invests in programs that serve diverse individuals seeking
equitable access to the advantages of technology and digital skills
that lead to improved economic mobility. Like all private
foundations, the Comcast NBCUniversal Foundation is required to
annually file IRS Form 990-PF, which provides information on its
mission, programs and finances, as well as a list of the names of
each recipient of its grants and contributions, fundraising or
investments, the purpose of such grants and contributions, and the
dollar amount received by each recipient.
In sum,
we believe that our charitable donations benefit the communities
where we operate, which in turn benefits our company and our
shareholders. We report on these efforts with sufficient detail to
provide shareholders with enough information to evaluate our
programs and approach to giving. The effort to create a report –
twice a year – for every contribution that is $999 or more would
require us to incur unnecessary expenses to produce a report that
provides no material incremental benefit to
shareholders.
For
the reasons set forth above, our Board unanimously recommends
AGAINST this proposal.
(1) |
Available at:
https://corporate.comcast.com/impact/report/2021. |
|
|
(2) |
Available
at:
https://update.comcast.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/dlm_uploads/2021/05/Update-on-our-commitment-compressed.pdf. |
62
Table of
Contents
Proposal
5: SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL TO PERFORM INDEPENDENT
RACIAL EQUITY AUDIT
|
 |
Our Board unanimously
recommends that shareholders vote “AGAINST” this shareholder
proposal.
|
The
following proposal and supporting statement were submitted by the
SEIU Master Trust, 1800 Massachusetts Ave NW, Suite 301,
Washington, D.C. 20036.
Supporting
Statement
RESOLVED
that shareholders of Comcast Corporation (“Comcast”) urge the Board
of Directors to oversee an independent racial equity audit
analyzing Comcast’s adverse impacts on nonwhite stakeholders and
communities of color. Input from civil rights organizations,
employees, and customers should be considered in determining the
specific matters to be analyzed.
A
report on the audit, prepared at reasonable cost and omitting
confidential or proprietary information, should be publicly
disclosed on Comcast’s website.
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
High-profile
police killings of Black people have galvanized the movement for
racial justice. That movement, together with the disproportionate
impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, have focused the attention of the
media, the public and policy makers on systemic racism, racialized
violence and inequities in employment, health care, and the
criminal justice system.
In
2020, Comcast announced plans to allocate $100 million in cash and
advertising to advance programs aimed at inequality against “any
race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation or
ability.”(1) Comcast also announced “diversity, equity
and inclusion workforce initiatives.”(2)
These steps are laudable,
but we believe that a racial equity audit remains necessary to help
identify, prioritize, remedy, and avoid adverse impacts on nonwhite
stakeholders and communities of color.
According
to its EEO-1 data, only 6% of Comcast executives/senior officers
are Black, compared to 18.6% of the remaining
workforce.(3)
In October 2020, Comcast
entered into a conciliation agreement with the U.S. Labor
Department to resolve allegations of pay discrimination against
Black and Latino employees after a routine audit found
discrimination against Black employees in the engineer and program
project management functions and Hispanic employees in the
marketing and strategic planning development functions. Comcast
denied the allegations, but agreed to back pay and interest plus
salary adjustments.(4)
In 2020, Comcast settled a
lawsuit with television producer Byron Allen, who alleged that
Comcast refused to offer his TV channels in its cable bundles
because he’s Black. The settlement gained Allen various benefits,
including carriage for three of his channels in Comcast’s Xfinity
packages.(5)
During the 2020 election
cycle, Comcast gave $755,000 to members of Congress who voted to
overturn the results of the presidential election,(6) an
action some viewed as an “attack on the voting rights of people of
color.”(7) Although Comcast paused such donations, PACs
affiliated with trade associations of which it is a member have
continued to donate.(8)
A 2021 study revealed that
from 2015 through 2020 Comcast was a leading corporate donor to
state lawmakers who support legislation that can discriminate
against minorities by making it more difficult to
vote.(9)
We urge Comcast to assess
its behavior through a racial equity lens in order to obtain a
complete picture of how it contributes to, and could help
dismantle, systemic racism.
(1) |
https://variety.com/2020/biz/news/comcast-100-million-injustice-inequality-1234627621/ |
(2) |
https://www.cmcsa.com/static-files/c49ca903-422b-49a9-8d42-91241478c06e |
(3) |
https://cmcsa.gcs-web.com/static-files/1d6d3ef6-d2d4-4c13-b452-7917b90e0032 |
(4) |
“U.S
Department of Labor and Comcast Corp. Reach Agreement to Resolve
Alleged Pay Discrimination,” DOL, 10/14/20 |
(5) |
Meg
James, “Byron Allen, Comcast settled long-running battle over
alleged racism,” LA Times, June 11, 2020. |
(6) |
https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2021/01/business/corporate-pac-suspensions/ |
(7) |
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/15/us/politics/lankford-apology-election-biden.html |
(8) |
https://update.comcast.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/dlm_uploads/2021/06/Trade-Associations-and-Other-501c6-and-501c4-Organization-Disclosure.pdf;
see also,
https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00082040/?tab=spending |
(9) |
https://www.citizen.org/article/corporate-sponsors-of-voter-suppression-state-lawmakers-50-million/;
https://www.washingtonpost.com/
politics/2021/07/22/voting-georgia-donations/ |
2022
Proxy Statement 63
Table of
Contents
Company
Response to Shareholder Proposal
Comcast
has a long-standing commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion
(“DE&I”), including racial equity. Since our founding in 1963,
our core values have been rooted in improving the communities where
our employees, customers and audiences live and work. Today, those
values, including upholding our commitment to DE&I within both
our workforce and the communities we serve, are embedded in our
culture and governance.
Although
we share the proponent’s intent to advance racial equity, our Board
recommends AGAINST this proposal because we feel it does not
take into account, and would divert management’s attention and
significant resources away from, the extensive efforts and
investments we are already making in DE&I and racial
equity.
As we
discuss in more detail below:
|
● |
Our
ongoing commitments to DE&I already reflect – and will continue
to reflect – recommendations from our external DE&I Advisory
Council, as well as other third-party advisors, partners and
employees, on ways to further improve and prioritize our
efforts. Because we take this work so seriously, our management
team is supported by a 14-member external DE&I Advisory Council
of business, academic, political and civil rights leaders from
Black and African American, Latino, Asian American and Pacific
Islander, Indigenous People and Native American, People with
Disabilities and LGBTQ+ communities. Among its members are leaders
of the National Urban League, UnidosUS, National Action Network,
Asian Americans Advancing Justice and GLAAD, to name a few. The
DE&I Advisory Council helps us prioritize and identify
opportunities in critical DE&I focus areas – both in connection
with our workforce and our external impacts – and facilitates open
communication on our development, monitoring and evaluation of
these focus areas – most of which are reported in our 2021 Impact
Report. |
|
|
|
|
● |
We
are actively using our resources – our people, programming and
platforms – to shed light on systemic racial equity issues and work
toward solutions in areas where we can have a meaningful and
measurable impact. Our DE&I efforts span a wide range of
racial equity-related initiatives and impacts, including the
diversity of our workforce, our efforts to address the digital
divide, our focus on creating and distributing content to amplify
diverse voices, and the support of diverse suppliers and the
communities where we do business. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Our
Board is dedicated to overseeing and supporting management’s
efforts to advance our DE&I priorities, including racial
equity. Our full Board, with specific support primarily from
our Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee, has
oversight of our DE&I strategy and programs. Our governance
structure is further strengthened by the leadership of our Chief
Diversity Officer, who reports to our Chairman and CEO and sits
outside of our human resources department to focus her efforts on
our critical DE&I focus areas relating to both our workforce
and our external impacts. Our Chief Diversity Officer is further
supported and informed by the external DE&I Advisory Council,
third-party consultants and input from our employees obtained from
a variety of sources, including our nine employee resource groups
(“ERGs”) for Asian Pacific American, Black, People with
Disabilities, LGBTQ+, Hispanic/Latino, Veteran, Young Professional,
Women and Indigenous employees, internal DE&I councils
throughout our company and employee engagement surveys. |
|
|
|
|
● |
We
are committed to transparency, and our increasingly granular public
reporting provides stakeholders with disclosure necessary to
monitor and track our progress. We have provided public
reporting on our DE&I efforts and progress for over ten years.
We are committed to the continued evolution of this reporting,
including through additional disclosure aligned with the
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board standards and public
disclosure of our EEO-1 reports. |
We
strongly believe that the independent audit called for in this
proposal is overly prescriptive in its scope and would not be
meaningfully additive to our existing processes or disclosure. At
the same time, we believe that the lack of details and any real
consensus as to what specifically the ‘audit’ would seek to review,
evaluate or accomplish for this purpose could significantly
distract our company from executing toward our core DE&I and
racial equity efforts. As a result, we believe shareholders would
be better served with our resources being used to further deepen
our extensive DE&I and racial equity efforts (outlined in more
detail below), rather than diverting management attention and
significant resources to an external audit.
We are
proud of the progress we have made and the transparency we provide,
and we believe that our processes and actions fully respond to the
spirit of the proposal. As a result, our Board believes that the
proponent’s requested independent audit is not in the best
interests of our shareholders and recommends that shareholders vote
AGAINST this proposal.
*********
64
Table of
Contents
Our
ongoing commitments to DE&I already reflect – and will continue
to reflect – recommendations from our external DE&I Advisory
Committee, as well as other external third-party advisors, partners
and our employees, on ways to further improve and prioritize our
efforts.
Realizing
that outside perspectives are needed to further strengthen and
deepen our DE&I programs, we believe we have a unique
governance structure in that we are guided by an external DE&I
Advisory Council that provides advice regarding our core DE&I
initiatives to help ensure accountability and drive progress across
matters relating to both our workforce and our external
impacts.
● |
The
external DE&I Advisory Council includes 14 external business,
academic, political and civil rights leaders from Black and African
American, Latino, Asian American and Pacific Islander, Indigenous
People and Native American, People with Disabilities and LGBTQ+
communities. Among its members are leaders of the National Urban
League, UnidosUS, National Action Network, Asian Americans
Advancing Justice and GLAAD, to name a few. |
|
|
● |
Our
inaugural external DE&I Advisory Council helped us identify the
following five critical DE&I focus areas: workforce,
programming/content, supplier diversity, governance and community
impact giving. Progress within each of these focus areas is
publicly reported in our 2021 Impact
Report(1). |
|
|
● |
The
DE&I Advisory Council also receives confidential reports and
briefings on our progress toward these DE&I focus areas so it
can better facilitate open communication on their development,
monitoring and evaluation. |
|
|
● |
The
DE&I Advisory Council operates as a formal body with a set of
governing policies and procedures. Our Chief Diversity Officer and
management present to Council members on a quarterly basis on
various topics across our businesses. Council members serve a
two-year term, and no member may serve for more than three
successive terms. In identifying Council members, we seek to
maintain an intersectional council with a diversity of strengths,
backgrounds, perspectives and communities represented. |
|
|
● |
For
more information on the DE&I Advisory Council, see our
Statement Regarding our Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
Initiatives.(2) |
In
addition:
● |
We
routinely partner with third parties, such as leading DE&I
consultants as well as schools and community-based organizations,
to help identify causes of inequity, particularly relating to the
digital divide. |
|
|
● |
Our
extensive network of ERGs, as well as input from third-party
advisors and results of employee engagement surveys, helps us
identify and prioritize certain workplace and culture-related
initiatives and impacts. |
We
are actively using our resources – our people, programming and
platforms – to shed light on systemic racial equity issues and work
toward solutions in areas where we can have a meaningful and
measurable impact.
Our
DE&I efforts focus on areas where we believe we can make the
most impact given the nature of our business. Our most recent 2021
Impact Report highlights some of the ways that we are working to
build, and rebuild, stronger and more inclusive communities to make
a positive difference and how we try to do what’s right for our
employees, customers, viewers and the world. These focus areas
include:
Workforce
We
believe that a diverse, equitable and inclusive company helps to
foster creativity, innovation and success. We embrace diversity of
background, perspective, culture and experience throughout our
business. For example:
● |
Since
our first public report over ten years ago, we have made progress
in representation of people of color in management. As of the end
of 2021, people of color represented 29.4% of our director-level
employees and 23.8% of our vice president-level and above
employees, compared to 19.1% and 15.6%, respectively, at the end of
2010. |
|
|
● |
We
offer a variety of training programs and initiatives focused on
creating a more inclusive workplace culture. These efforts include
company-wide forums like our DE&I speaker series which is
designed to educate, inspire dialogue and foster employee
engagement through a curated experience anchored by external
scholars, authors and thought leaders focusing on a variety of
DE&I topics. |
|
|
● |
We
support nine ERGs with 35,000 members in over 200
chapters. |
|
|
● |
We have
engaged third-party consultants to review and evaluate
workforce-related programs and recommend opportunities for
improvement. |
(1) |
Available at
https://corporate.comcast.com/impact/report/2021. |
|
|
(2) |
Available
at
https://www.cmcsa.com/static-files/c49ca903-422b-49a9-8d42-91241478c06e. |
2022
Proxy Statement 65
Table of
Contents
Digital
Equity
Comcast
has long been at the forefront of addressing digital inequities,
including through Internet Essentials, which we believe is the
nation’s largest and most comprehensive internet adoption program
for low-income families. Over the past decade, we have continued to
innovate and expand the eligibility requirements for this program,
connecting a cumulative total of over 10 million low-income
Americans to the internet.
● |
When we
launched Internet Essentials in 2011, it was available only to
families of school-aged children eligible to participate in the
National School Lunch Program. Over the past decade, we have
continued to expand the reach of this program to cover even more
individuals, with eligibility today including households that
receive public housing assistance, Medicaid, Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance benefits (SNAP), Social Security Income (SSI), Federal
Pell Grants and various other benefit programs. |
|
|
● |
While
the cost of Internet Essentials has remained flat at $9.95 a month
since 2011, we have consistently increased its speeds, which now
has a 50 Mbps download speed. With our participation in the federal
government’s broadband benefits programs that enable qualifying
low-income customers to apply a financial subsidy to our broadband
services, customers can receive our Internet Essentials service or
our new enhanced Internet Essentials Plus service with twice the
download speed – up to 100 Mbps – effectively for free. |
|
|
● |
To
respond to the challenges presented by the global pandemic, among
other things, we provided new Internet Essentials customers with 60
days of free service, made our 1.5 million public Wi-Fi hotspots
available for free, waived bad-debt program eligibility and created
affordable and flexible payment plans to allow customers and small
businesses to retain their services. |
Over
the past two years, we have launched our new Internet Essentials
Partnership Program, which focuses on enabling cities, school
districts and community-based organizations to connect large
numbers of students to broadband access at home. To date, we have
collaborated with hundreds of schools and organizations across the
country. We also have helped bridge the digital divide through
digital skills training initiatives to unlock opportunities and new
career pathways in media and technology – both through our own
training programs and through partnerships with leading
organizations that provide support and resources necessary for
success, such as Per Scholas and Genesys Works.
As part
of our ongoing commitment to help connect low-income families to
the internet, in 2020 we launched our “Lift Zones” effort to create
more than 1,000 WiFi-connected Lift Zones in community centers
nationwide. Lift Zones are designed to complement our Internet
Essentials program and help students participate in remote learning
who, for a variety of reasons (including homelessness or housing
insecurity issues), are otherwise unable to participate in
educational opportunities and the digital economy.
We
realize that more work still needs to be done to expand our digital
equity initiatives and that we alone cannot solve the problem. That
is why we enlisted the support of a leading consultancy to help
evaluate the barriers to broadband adoption and how we and others
can work together to bridge the digital divide. We have actively
sponsored and participated in the federal government’s broadband
benefits programs to provide discounted internet service to those
in need, namely the Emergency Broadband Benefit program that
launched in May 2021 to immediately enable qualifying low-income
customers to apply a financial subsidy to any tier of our broadband
services, including Internet Essentials, and its successor, the
longer-term Affordable Connectivity Program that launched at the
end of 2021. We also participate in federal, state and local
programs designed to fund the expansion of broadband to unserved
Americans and extend our world class network to new areas where
reliable, high-speed internet services had previously been
unavailable.
We are
serious about closing the digital divide and working with the cable
industry, schools, governments, nonprofits, businesses and
communities to remedy the many issues that act as barriers to
broadband access in the home.
Programming
We
strive to have diverse perspectives that resonate with a wide range
of audiences in our programming at NBCUniversal and in the content
we distribute on our Xfinity platforms.
We have
created opportunities in front of and behind the camera, including
by offering a wide range of programs designed to build a diverse
pipeline of talent, including directors, writers, actors, music
composers and journalists. We regularly report on the percentage of
people of color represented on air and behind the camera. For
example, in 2021, people of color represented 36.4% of film talent
on screen and 47.6% of on-air talent at our news assets, as well as
17.2% of film talent behind the camera and 35.1% of talent behind
the camera at our news assets.
66
Table of
Contents
We have
developed programs that seek to build additional opportunities for
diverse talent, including the following examples:
● |
NBCUniversal
launched an innovative, multiplatform journalism training and
development program for students at Historically Black Colleges and
Universities and diverse-serving institutions, as well as a
multi-year $3.5 million scholarship fund for underrepresented
students. |
|
|
● |
NBCUniversal
created a fellowship program awarding diverse documentary
filmmakers grants to support feature-length nonfiction films
highlighting social issues and identities, with seven
groundbreaking filmmakers named in 2021 for the first inaugural
fellowship. |
|
|
Through
our media platforms, we have worked to amplify diverse voices and
cultures. For example: |
|
● |
Our
Cable Communications division has created a vast ecosystem of
diverse content on Xfinity, including curated On Demand
destinations. Among the content included is the “Black Experience,”
which gives viewers access to Black entertainment programming with
collections of stories that showcase the breadth of Black culture,
endorsed by the African American Film Critics Association, and the
“¡Mi gente, presente!” curated collection of bilingual and
bicultural content to celebrate Hispanic Heritage
month. |
|
|
● |
NBCUniversal’s
‘The More You Know’ series of public service announcements have
kept audiences informed and educated on issues that include a
campaign to speak out against systemic racism and speaking up for
social justice, equality and equity. |
|
|
● |
NBCUniversal’s
‘Plan Your Vote’ campaign provided much needed voting information
for the 2020 elections, including comprehensive resources for voter
planning though an interactive, state-by-state guide — which also
was translated into Spanish and amplified by our Telemundo
network. |
|
|
● |
NBC
News programs aired ‘The Racism Virus’, a streaming special on the
stark rise in anti-Asian discrimination and hate attacks occurring
nationwide and how the Asian community is coping, the psychological
and economic toll of discrimination and how to bring a sense of
belonging and unity again. |
Supplier
Diversity and Small Business Support
We have
long maintained a supplier diversity program designed to promote,
increase and improve the participation of diverse businesses within
our corporate supply chain. We have been a member of the Billion
Dollar Roundtable, a top-level corporate advocacy organization that
promotes supply chain diversity, since 2015. We were the first
media and technology company to be inducted for attaining $1
billion or more in annual Tier I (direct supplier) supply chain
diversity spend, and have spent at least $3 billion each year with
diverse suppliers during the past 5 years. In 2021, we spent over
$4.3 billion with diverse Tier 1 vendors (with direct purchases
from approximately 3,250 diverse suppliers) and over $390 million
with diverse Tier 2 subcontractors. Since 2011, we have spent over
$30 billion with diverse suppliers.
Over
the past two years, we have separately expanded our efforts to
support small business diversity:
● |
Our
Comcast RISE program, which was launched in 2020 in connection with
our $100 million social justice initiative, has helped over 6,700
small businesses owned by people of color in 590 cities across 34
states through grants, marketing and technology
resources. |
|
|
● |
We
invested $25 million in the Seibert Williams Shank Clear Vision
Impact Fund, a diverse-led and diverse-serving financial
institution that provides direct support to local community
businesses. |
|
|
● |
We
invested $10 million in the Inclusiv Racial Equity and Resilience
Investment Fund, which is aimed at building equity in credit unions
led by and/or serving people of color in an effort to help increase
lending to people of color-owned businesses, homeowners and
consumers by providing financial opportunities to traditionally
underserved and underbanked communities. |
Our
Board is dedicated to overseeing and supporting management’s
efforts to advance our DE&I priorities, including racial
equity.
Our
commitment to DE&I starts at the top, with our Board. As a
whole and through its committees, our Board oversees and assesses
our priority areas, efforts and progress on DE&I
matters.
Our
Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee, pursuant to its
charter, reviews and assesses significant social issues, risks and
trends, including with respect to DE&I matters affecting our
workforce and our external impacts. In 2021, for example, this
Committee reviewed:
2022
Proxy Statement 67
Table of
Contents
● |
Our
workforce-related DE&I efforts, including hiring, promotion and
retention statistics broken down by detailed demographic
categories. |
|
|
● |
Opportunities
identified by an outside consultant, which had reviewed extensive
workforce data and conducted employee interviews and focus groups,
to further progress our DE&I efforts relating to Comcast
Cable’s workforce, our largest workforce. |
|
|
● |
Information
about the diverse programming we create and distribute, and our
annual spend with diverse suppliers. |
|
|
● |
Our
progress toward the incremental $100 million pledge we made in 2020
to advance social justice and equality, with a focus on communities
of color, which we are well on track to fulfill by the end of
2022. |
Our
Compensation and Human Capital Committee, pursuant to its charter,
reviews our programs and strategies related to human capital
management, including with respect to employee engagement. In 2021,
for example, it reviewed the results of our employee engagement
survey, which showed that across our company, employees viewed our
DE&I-related workforce efforts very favorably, with upward
trends compared to prior years in nearly all instances.
In
addition, our Board and senior management team are committed to,
and management is incentivized through our executive compensation
program to create, a strong workplace culture with values of
integrity and respect and to foster our company’s DE&I and
digital equity efforts.
Our
Chief Diversity Officer leads our DE&I efforts across our
company, developing and executing our DE&I corporate strategy,
and reports on these matters at least twice a year to our Board or
its committees. Our Chief Diversity Officer reports to our Chairman
and CEO and sits outside of our human resources department to focus
her efforts on our critical DE&I focus areas relating to both
our workforce and our external impacts.
We
are committed to transparency, and our increasingly granular public
reporting provides stakeholders with disclosure necessary to
monitor and track our progress.
We have
published annual reports tracking our DE&I initiatives and
progress for over a decade. We also disclose information on these
matters on our ESG Reporting website at https://www.cmcsa.com/esg-reporting,
as well as in the “Impact” section of our website at www.comcastcorporation.com.
This
disclosure includes:
● |
Our
2021 Impact Report, which provides information on our critical
DE&I focus areas, including our digital equity efforts. It
includes statistics on total workforce and new hire data, in each
case broken down by gender and specific people of color categories
(Asian American, Black, Indigenous, Latino and two or more races)
and by specific leadership levels (executive leadership team, vice
presidents and above, directors and managers), as well as data on
our programming content, supplier diversity and community impact
activities. |
|
|
● |
An
update in 2021 on progress toward our $100 million commitment to
advance social justice and equality. |
|
|
● |
Our
consolidated EEO-1 report for 2020, which presents another view of
our workforce diversity data in a standardized
framework. |
|
|
● |
Our
2021 Internet Essential Progress Report, which provides information
on our long-standing commitment to and progress on our digital
equity efforts. |
|
|
● |
Our
Statement Regarding our Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
Initiatives, which further describes how our DE&I efforts are
discussed and assessed by our Board and its committees and the
external DE&I Advisory Council. |
*********
For
the reasons set forth above, our Board unanimously recommends
AGAINST this proposal.
68