How can I get help if I have trouble checking in or listening to the annual meeting online?
If you encounter difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual meeting log-in page.
What is the effect of giving a proxy?
Proxies are solicited by and on behalf of our board of directors. Rami Elghandour, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Michelle Gilson, our Chief Financial Officer, and Maryam Abdul-Kareem, our General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer, have been designated as proxy holders for the annual meeting by our board of directors. When proxies are properly dated, executed and returned, the shares represented by such proxies will be voted at the annual meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. If the proxy is dated and signed, but no specific instructions are given, however, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors on the proposals as described above. If any other matters are properly brought before the annual meeting, then the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. If the annual meeting is postponed or adjourned, then the proxy holders can vote your shares on the new meeting date, unless you have properly revoked your proxy, as described above.
Who will count the votes?
A representative of BetaNXT Inc. will tabulate the votes and act as inspector of election.
How can I contact Arcellx’s transfer agent?
You may contact our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., by telephone at 1-800-736-3001 (US) or 1-781-575-3100 (non-US), or by writing Computershare Trust Company, N.A., at P.O. Box 43006, Providence, RI 02940-3606.You may also access instructions with respect to certain stockholder matters (e.g., change of address) via the internet at www.computershare.com.
How are proxies solicited for the annual meeting and who is paying for such solicitation?
Our board of directors is soliciting proxies for use at the annual meeting by means of the proxy materials. We will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, mailing and distribution of the proxy materials. Copies of solicitation materials will also be made available upon request to brokers, banks and other nominees to forward to the beneficial owners of the shares held of record by such brokers, banks or other nominees. The original solicitation of proxies may be supplemented by solicitation by telephone, electronic communications or other means by our directors, officers or employees. No additional compensation will be paid to these individuals for any such services, although we may reimburse such individuals for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation.
Where can I find the voting results of the annual meeting?
We will disclose voting results on a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, within four business days after the meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to file a Form 8-K, we will file a Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and will provide the final results in an amendment to the Form 8-K as soon as they become available.
Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability instead of a full set of proxy materials?
In accordance with the rules of the SEC we have elected to furnish our proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our annual report, primarily via the Internet. As a result, we are mailing to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. The Notice of Internet Availability contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials on the Internet, how to vote on the proposals, how to request printed copies of the proxy materials and our annual report, and how to request to receive all future proxy
-5-
from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Rutgers University School of Engineering.
We believe that Mr. Elghandour is qualified to serve on our board due to his investment and engineering experience, strategic and operational track record, and his service as our President and Chief Executive Officer.
David Lubner. David C. Lubner, M.S. has served as a director of our company since August 2020. Mr. Lubner served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ra Pharmaceuticals Inc., a biotechnology company acquired by UCB S.A. in April 2020, from January 2016 until June 2020. Before joining Ra Pharmaceuticals, Mr. Lubner served as Chief Financial Officer of Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals from its inception in 2006 to 2016, as Chief Financial Officer of PharMetrics from 1999 until it was acquired by IMS Health in 2005 and as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ProScript from 1996 to 1999, where Velcade® (bortezomib), a therapy widely used for the treatment of the blood cancer multiple myeloma, was discovered. Mr. Lubner currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Cargo Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: CRGX), Dyne Therapeutics Inc. (Nasdaq:DYN), Vor Biopharma Inc. (Nasdaq:VOR), and several other private companies. Mr. Lubner previously served on the board of directors of Nightstar Therapeutics plc from 2017 until it was acquired by Biogen in June 2019, Therapeutics Acquisition Corporation (d/b/a as Research Alliance Corp. I.), a blank check company focused on the healthcare industry, Gemini Therapeutics, Inc. and Point Biopharma, Inc. from 2021 until it was acquired by Eli Lilly & Co. in December 2023. Mr. Lubner is a former Certified Public Accountant. He received his B.S. in administration from Northeastern University and an M.S. in taxation from Bentley University.
We believe that Mr. Lubner is qualified to serve on our board based on his financial and senior executive leadership experience and his biotechnology company board experience, including serving as an audit committee chair.
Kristin Myers. Kristin Myers has served as a member of our board of directors since March 2025. Ms. Myers has served as the Chief Operating Officer at Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, a health care coverage company, since 2024. Prior to Blue Cross, from 2021 to 2024, Ms. Myers served as Chief Executive Officer and co-founder of Hopscotch Health, a tech-enabled healthcare services company. Prior to Hopscotch Health, from 2020 to 2021, Ms. Myers served as the Chief Operating Officer and President, PPM Division of Unified Women’s Healthcare, a women’s healthcare company. From 2013 to 2020, Ms. Myers served in various roles at Aetna, a health care insurance company, including, President, Great Lakes Region, President, Student Health Business, and Chief of Staff and Strategic Planning, Office of the CEO and Chairman. Ms. Myers earned a BS in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and an MBA from Harvard Business School.
We believe Ms. Myers is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to her extensive industry experience.
Continuing Directors
Ali Behbahani. Ali Behbahani, M.D. has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2015. Dr. Behbahani joined New Enterprise Associates (NEA), a venture capital firm, in 2007 and is currently a Partner and the Co-Head of Healthcare. Prior to joining NEA, he worked as an intern and later as a consultant in business development at The Medicines Company, a specialty pharmaceutical company developing acute care cardiovascular products. He previously held positions as a Venture Associate at Morgan Stanley Venture Partners from 2000 to 2002 and as a Healthcare Investment Banking Analyst at Lehman Brothers from 1998 to 2000. Dr. Behbahani has been a member of the board of directors of Adaptimmune Therapeutics Plc (Nasdaq: ADAP) since September 2014, Black Diamond Therapeutics (Nasdaq: BDTX) since December 2018, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (Nasdaq: CRSP) since March 2015, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: GLUE) since April 2020, Nkarta, Inc. (Nasdaq: NKTX) since August 2015 and Korro Bio, Inc. (Nasdaq: KRRO) since August 2019. Dr. Behbahani previously served as a member of the board of directors of CVRx, Inc. (Nasdaq: CVRX) from July 2013 to September 2024, Genocea Biosciences (Nasdaq: GNCA) from February 2018 to May 2022, Minerva Surgical, Inc. (Nasdaq: UTRS) from May 2011 to January 2024, and Oyster Point Pharma (Nasdaq: OYST) from July 2017 to January 2023. Dr. Behbahani received a B.S. in biomedical engineering, electrical
-8-
engineering and chemistry from Duke University, an M.B.A. from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and an M.D. from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.
We believe that Dr. Behbahani is qualified to serve on our board due to his experience in life sciences and his experience as a member of the boards of directors of multiple companies in the life science industry.
Andrew Galligan. Andrew Galligan has served as a member of our board of directors since March 2025. Mr. Galligan has served on the board of directors of Ooma, Inc. (NYSE: OOMA) since December 2014. Mr. Galligan is currently a private investor. From May 2010 to July 2020, Mr. Galligan served as Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Nevro Corp., a medical device company. He served as Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Ooma, Inc., a telecommunications company from February 2009 to May 2010, and as a consultant for Ooma, Inc. from September 2010 to December 2014. From 2007 to 2008, Mr. Galligan served as Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Reliant Technologies, Inc., a medical device company (later acquired by Solta Medical, Inc.). Mr. Galligan has also held the top financial executive position at several other medical device companies and began his career in various financial positions at KPMG LLP and Raychem Corp. Mr. Galligan received a B.B.S. in Business and Finance from Trinity College, Dublin University (Ireland) and is also a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland.
We believe that Mr. Galligan is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of his extensive experience as a senior financing executive in the life sciences industry.
Jill Carroll. Jill Carroll, M.S. has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2017. Ms. Carroll has served as partner of SR One Capital Management, LP (S.R. One), an entity affiliated with SR One Capital Fund I Aggregator, LP since September 2020. Prior to S.R. One, Ms. Carroll was principal at S.R. One, Limited, initially joining as a Senior Associate in September 2011. From August 2010 to August 2011, Ms. Carroll served as a VP, Corporate Development at Limerick Biopharma. Between May 2004 and August 2010, Ms. Carroll was served as the Senior Director, Strategic Planning & Corporate Development at Dynavax Technologies (Nasdaq:DVAX), where she was involved in multiple pharma-partnering deals, as well as substantial private and public financings. Ms. Carroll also served as a director at Clearview Projects from Sept 2001 to May 2004 and as a consultant specializing in health care at Mercer Management Consulting from March 1999 to July 2001. Ms. Carroll is a member of the board of directors of HotSpot Therapeutics, Ancora Biotech, Phylaxis Biosciences, Avalyn Pharma and Odyssey Therapeutics. Ms. Carroll received her B.S. in Chemistry from Duke University and her M.S. in Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Biology from Johns Hopkins University.
We believe that Ms. Carroll is qualified to serve our board of directors because of her substantial experience as an investor and her prior management experience as a consultant and as an executive in the biotech industry.
Kavita Patel. Kavita Patel, M.D. has served as a member of our board of directors since December 2021. Dr. Patel has been employed as a primary care physician at Mary’s Center in Washington, DC since January 2020. From January 2011 to January 2022, Dr. Patel has served as a Nonresident Fellow at the Brookings Institution. Dr. Patel has also served as a venture partner at New Enterprise Associates since 2017. Dr. Patel previously served in leadership roles at Johns Hopkins from 2011 to 2018. From 2009 to 2010, she served as Director of Policy for the Office on Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement at The White House. From 2007 to 2009, she served as policy analyst and trusted aide and was part of the senior staff of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee under Senator Edward Kennedy’s leadership. Dr. Patel currently serves as a member of the board of directors of several non-profit organizations, including SSM Healthcare, a non-profit integrated delivery system. She has also served as a member of the Health and Human Services (HHS) Physician Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee from 2016 to 2021. Dr. Patel’s prior research in healthcare quality and community approaches to mental illness have earned national recognition and she has published numerous papers and book chapters on healthcare reform and health policy. Dr. Patel previously served on the board of directors of Tesaro, Inc. (Nasdaq: TSRO) from 2016 to 2018, Sigilon
-9-
Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: SGTX) from 2020 to 2024 and Intelligent Medicine Acquisition Corp (NASDAQ: IQMD). Dr. Patel currently serves on the board of directors of, SelectQuote, Inc. (NYSE: SLQT) and several other private companies. Dr. Patel earned an M.D. from University of Texas Health Science Center, an M.S. in Health Services Research from the University of California Los Angeles and her B.A. from the University of Texas at Austin.
We believe that Dr. Patel is qualified to serve our board of directors because of her clinical and business experience and history as a policy maker, hospital administrator and practicing clinician.
Olivia Ware. Olivia Ware has served on our board of directors since May 2022. Ms. Ware has more than 20 years of experience in pharmaceutical drug development, commercialization and healthcare management. From November 2019 to March 2021, Ms. Ware served as the Senior Vice President, BTK Franchise Head at Principia Biopharma Inc., which was acquired by Sanofi S.A. (Nasdaq: SNY) in 2020, where she was responsible for developing overall portfolio strategy for the company’s three BTKi molecules. From 2018 to 2019, Ms. Ware served as Senior Vice President, U.S. Market and Franchise Development at Proteus Digital Health, Inc. From 2011 to 2018, Ms. Ware worked in a number of public and private biopharma firms as a private consultant. From 2016 to 2017, Ms. Ware was the Chief Commercial Officer at CytRx, Inc. From 1997 to 2010, Ms. Ware worked at Genentech, Inc. in a variety of roles of increasing responsibility in commercial, team leadership and product development. During her time at Genentech, Ms. Ware played a key role in the launch of several commercial drug products, including Rituxan®, Herceptin®, Avastin® and Lucentis®, and as Head of Oncology Team Leadership was responsible for molecule, disease and platform strategic plans and oncology portfolio management. Ms. Ware has served as a member of the board of Contineum, Inc. (Nasdaq:CTNM) since April 2024 and previously served as a member of the board of Ambrx Biopharma Inc. (Nasdaq: ADR) from April 2021 to June 2022 and Revance Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: RVNC) from March 2021 to January 2025. Ms. Ware holds an A.B. in Psychology from Davidson College and an M.B.A. in Finance and Marketing from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
We believe that Ms. Ware is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to her experience as a consultant and executive in life sciences and biotechnology board experience.
Director Independence
Our common stock is listed on Nasdaq. As a company listed on Nasdaq, we are required under Nasdaq listing rules to maintain a board comprised of a majority of independent directors as determined affirmatively by our board. Under Nasdaq listing rules, a director will only qualify as an independent director if, in the opinion of that listed company’s board of directors, the director does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In addition, the Nasdaq listing rules require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of our audit, compensation and corporate governance and nominating committees be independent.
Audit committee members must also satisfy the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and Nasdaq listing rules applicable to audit committee members. Compensation committee members must also satisfy the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act and Nasdaq listing rules applicable to compensation committee members.
Our board of directors has undertaken a review of the independence of each of our directors. Based on information provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, our board of directors has determined that Ali Behbahani, Jill Carroll, David Lubner, Kavita Patel, Olivia Ware, Andrew Galligan and Kristin Myers, representing seven of our eight directors, do not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is an “independent director” as defined under the listing standards of Nasdaq. Rami Elghandour is not considered an independent director because of his position as our President and Chief Executive Officer.
-10-
Executive Sessions of Non-Employee Directors
To encourage and enhance communication among non-employee directors, and as required under applicable Nasdaq rules, our corporate governance guidelines provide that the non-employee directors will meet in executive sessions without management present on a periodic basis. In addition, if any of our non-employee directors are not independent directors, then our independent directors will also meet in executive session on a period basis. Both of these sessions occurred following every board of directors meeting during 2024 and after every committee meeting as well.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2024, the members of our compensation committee were Ms. Carroll, Dr. Patel and Mr. Lubner. None of the members of our compensation committee is or has been an officer or employee of our company. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past fiscal year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors or compensation committee.
Considerations in Evaluating Director Nominees
Our corporate governance and nominating committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating potential director nominees. In its evaluation of director candidates, including the current directors eligible for re-election, our corporate governance and nominating committee will consider the current size and composition of our board of directors and the needs of our board of directors and the respective committees of our board of directors and other director qualifications. While our board has not established minimum qualifications for board members, some of the factors that our corporate governance and nominating committee considers in assessing director nominee qualifications include, without limitation, issues of character, professional ethics and integrity, judgment, business experience and diversity, and with respect to diversity, such factors as race, ethnicity, gender, differences in professional background, age and geography, as well as other individual qualities and attributes that contribute to the total mix of viewpoints and experience represented on our board. Although our board of directors does not maintain a specific policy with respect to board diversity, our board of directors believes that the board should be a diverse body, and the corporate governance and nominating committee considers a broad range of perspectives, backgrounds and experiences.
If our corporate governance and nominating committee determines that an additional or replacement director is required, then the committee may take such measures as it considers appropriate in connection with its evaluation of a director candidate, including candidate interviews, inquiry of the person or persons making the recommendation or nomination, engagement of an outside search firm to gather additional information, or reliance on the knowledge of the members of the committee, board or management.
After completing its review and evaluation of director candidates, our corporate governance and nominating committee recommends to our full board of directors the director nominees for selection. Our corporate governance and nominating committee has discretion to decide which individuals to recommend for nomination as directors and our board of directors has the final authority in determining the selection of director candidates for nomination to our board.
Stockholder Recommendations and Nominations to our Board of Directors
Our corporate governance and nominating committee will consider recommendations and nominations for candidates to our board of directors from stockholders in the same manner as candidates recommended to the committee from other sources, so long as such recommendations and nominations comply with our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, all applicable company policies and all applicable laws, rules and regulations, including those promulgated by the SEC. Our corporate governance and
-14-
nominating committee will evaluate such recommendations in accordance with its charter, our bylaws and corporate governance guidelines and the director nominee criteria described above.
A stockholder that wants to recommend a candidate to our board of directors should direct the recommendation in writing by letter to our corporate secretary at Arcellx, Inc., 800 Bridge Parkway, Redwood City, CA 94065, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Such recommendation must include the candidate’s name, home and business contact information, detailed biographical data, relevant qualifications, a signed letter from the candidate confirming willingness to serve, information regarding any relationships between the candidate and us and evidence of the recommending stockholder’s ownership of our capital stock. Such recommendation must also include a statement from the recommending stockholder in support of the candidate. Our corporate governance and nominating committee has discretion to decide which individuals to recommend for nomination as directors.
Under our amended and restated bylaws, stockholders may also directly nominate persons for our board of directors. Any nomination must comply with the requirements set forth in our amended and restated bylaws and the rules and regulations of the SEC and should be sent in writing to our corporate secretary at the address above. To be timely for our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders, nominations must be received by our corporate secretary observing the deadlines discussed below under “Other Matters—Stockholder Proposals or Director Nominations for 2025 Annual Meeting.”
Communications with the Board of Directors
Stockholders and other interested parties wishing to communicate directly with our non-management directors, may do so by writing and sending the correspondence to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or General Counsel by mail to our principal executive offices at Arcellx, Inc., 800 Bridge Parkway, Redwood City, CA 94065. Our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or General Counsel, in consultation with appropriate directors as necessary, will review all incoming communications and screen for communications that (1) are solicitations for products and services, (2) relate to matters of a personal nature not relevant for our stockholders to act on or for our board to consider and (3) matters that are of a type that are improper or irrelevant to the functioning of our board or our business, for example, mass mailings, job inquiries and business solicitations. If appropriate, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or General Counsel will route such communications to the appropriate director(s) or, if none is specified, then to the chairperson of the board or the lead independent director (if one is appointed). These policies and procedures do not apply to communications to non-management directors from our officers or directors who are stockholders or stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act.
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our board of directors has adopted corporate governance guidelines. These guidelines address, among other items, the qualifications and responsibilities of our directors and director candidates, the structure and composition of our board of directors and corporate governance policies and standards applicable to us in general. In addition, our board of directors has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and other executive and senior financial officers. The full text of our corporate governance guidelines and code of business conduct and ethics are available on our website at www.arcellx.com. We will post amendments to our code of business conduct and ethics or any waivers of our code of business conduct and ethics for directors and executive officers on the same website.
Director Compensation
Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy
Our board of directors has adopted a compensation policy for our non-employee directors. The non-employee director compensation policy was developed with input from our independent compensation consultant regarding
-15-
PROPOSAL NO. 2:
ADVISORY VOTE FOR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking our stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly referred to as the “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation as a whole. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation or any specific named executive officer, but rather the overall compensation of all of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement.
The say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore is not binding on us, our compensation committee or our board of directors. The say-on-pay vote will, however, provide information to us regarding investor sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices, which our compensation committee will be able to consider when determining executive compensation for the remainder of the current fiscal year and beyond. Our board of directors and our compensation committee value the opinions of our stockholders. To the extent there is any significant vote against the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will endeavor to communicate with stockholders to better understand the concerns that influenced the vote and consider our stockholders’ concerns, and our compensation committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
You are encouraged to review the section titled “Executive Compensation”, which provides an overview of our executive compensation program and contains tabular information and narrative discussion about the compensation of our named executive officers.
We are asking our stockholders to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement by voting for the following non-binding resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the compensation tables and the narrative discussion.”
Vote Required
The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the shares present in person (including virtually) or represented by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
As an advisory vote, the result of this proposal is non-binding. Although the vote is non-binding, our board of directors and our compensation committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers.
Board Recommendation
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
-25-
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) is intended to assist our stockholders in understanding our executive compensation program. It also explains how we determined the material elements of compensation for our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and the executive officer (other than our principal executive officer and principal financial officer) who was our most highly-compensated executive officer as of December 31, 2024, and whom we refer to as our “named executive officers” or “NEOs.” We had three executive officers in 2024, all of whom served for the full year.
For 2024, our NEOs were as follows:
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer |
|
Title |
Rami Elghandour |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |
Michelle Gilson |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Christopher Heery |
|
Chief Medical Officer |
This CD&A provides an overview of our executive compensation-related policies, practices and decisions for the fiscal year 2024. It also provides an overview of our executive compensation philosophy, the overall objectives of our executive compensation program, and each compensation element that we provide to our executive officers. In addition, it explains how and why the compensation committee of our board of directors arrived at the specific compensation decisions for our executives, including our named executive officers, in 2024.
Company Overview and Performance
As a clinical-stage biotechnology company, our mission is to advance humanity by engineering cell therapies that are safer, more effective, and more broadly accessible. Our executive compensation program plays a critical role in attracting and retaining exceptional talent to achieve our mission.
2024 was a pivotal year for Arcellx. We celebrated our 10th anniversary by advancing what we believe will become the leading therapy for patients suffering from relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Relatedly, we completed enrollment in our pivotal study, iMMagine-1, and shared positive results from the study at the American Society of Hematology meeting in December 2024. This data, combined with a positive long-term update from our Phase 1 study, highlighted the potential best-in-class profile for anito-cel, our lead program. Underpinning this significant achievement, was consistent execution across our clinical and operational teams who managed the iMMagine-1 study and delivered a 99% manufacturing success rate. Additionally, we completed the technical transfer of anito-cel to our partners at Kite, allowing us to initiate and dose the first patient in iMMagine-3, our earlier line study of anito-cel. In parallel to these company defining achievements, we continued to advance our pipeline, continuing the execution of our Phase 1 study of ACLX-002 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia while initiating a Phase 1 study of anito-cel in Myasthenia Gravis, an autoimmune disease. Finally, we continued to operate in a capital efficient matter meeting our budgetary goals and our launch preparation objectives. This progress reflects our incredible and dedicated team who managed to deliver on all our critical core goals and a number of our stretch goals for 2024 positioning us for continued success. In addition to our operational performance, we are equally proud of the culture we’re building at Arcellx. In 2024, we were recognized as a Great Place to Work® as well as for Best Company Culture, and Best Company Leadership. We are excited to carry this momentum into 2025 as we continue scaling our organization to deliver on the promise of Arcellx for our patients, physicians, team members and shareholders.
Executive Compensation Policies and Practices
We endeavor to maintain sound executive compensation policies and practices, including compensation-related corporate governance standards, consistent with our executive compensation philosophy. During 2024, the
-30-
from time to time as it deems necessary and appropriate. Although the compensation committee considers a multitude of factors in its deliberations, including competitive positioning relative to its peer group, it places no formal weighting on any one factor. As we continue to grow, the compensation committee will evaluate our compensation philosophy and program objectives as circumstances require. At a minimum, we expect the compensation committee to review executive compensation annually.
Compensation-Setting Process
Role of the Compensation Committee
The compensation committee, among its other responsibilities, establishes our executive pay philosophy, provides oversight of our compensation policies, and reviews and approves our executive compensation program, including the specific compensation of our named executive officers. The compensation committee has the authority to retain special counsel and other advisors, including compensation consultants, to assist in carrying out its responsibilities to determine the compensation of our executives. The compensation committee’s authority, duties, and responsibilities are described in its charter, which is reviewed regularly and revised and updated as warranted. A copy of the compensation committee charter is available on our investor relations website at https://ir.arcellx.com/governance/governance-documents/default.aspx.
The compensation committee relies on its compensation consultant and legal counsel, as well as our Chief Executive Officer, to formulate recommendations with respect to specific compensation actions. The compensation committee approves executive compensation and non-executive compensation guidelines for all employees including all final decisions for base salary levels, target annual bonus opportunities, actual bonus payments, and long-term incentives in the form of equity awards except for our Chief Executive Officer.
The compensation of our Chief Executive Officer is additionally developed, reviewed, and approved by the compensation committee and the full board of directors without his participation. The compensation committee meets on a regularly scheduled basis and at other times as needed. The compensation committee periodically reviews compensation matters with our board of directors.
At the end of each year, the compensation committee reviews our executive compensation program, including any incentive compensation plans and arrangements, to assess whether our compensation elements, actions, and decisions are (i) properly coordinated, (ii) aligned with our vision, mission, values, and corporate goals, (iii) provide appropriate short-term and long-term incentives for our executives, (iv) achieve their intended purposes, and (v) are competitive with the compensation of executives in comparable positions at the companies with which we compete for executive talent. Following this assessment, the compensation committee makes any necessary or appropriate modifications to our existing plans and arrangements or adopts new plans or arrangements.
The factors considered by the compensation committee in determining the compensation of our named executive officers for 2024 included, among others:
|
• |
|
the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer, except with respect to his own compensation; |
|
• |
|
overall company performance; |
|
• |
|
the management team’s individual performances; |
|
• |
|
breadth of responsibilities; |
|
• |
|
reflection of culture and values; |
|
• |
|
the growth in our stock price; |
|
• |
|
projected equity pool usage and availability; |
|
• |
|
the need to retain executives; |
-33-
|
• |
|
a review of the relevant competitive market analysis prepared by Meridian; |
|
• |
|
the portions of total compensation that are fixed and variable; and |
|
• |
|
a holding power analysis, showing the retentive power of granted but unvested equity awards. |
The compensation committee considers this information in light of their individual experience, knowledge of the company, knowledge of each executive officer, knowledge of the competitive market, and business judgment in making their decisions regarding executive compensation and our executive compensation program.
Role of Our Chief Executive Officer and Management
The compensation committee works with members of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, in determining the compensation of our named executive officers. Our management works with the compensation committee to recommend the structure of the annual bonus plan, and to identify and develop corporate performance objectives for such a plan, and to evaluate actual performance against the selected measures. Our Chief Executive Officer also makes recommendations to the compensation committee as described in the following paragraph and is involved in the determination of compensation for executives other than himself.
At the end of each year, Meridian develops preliminary recommendations for consideration which are then adjusted, as applicable, by our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, except with respect to his own compensation, to account for the company’s historical practices and individual performance. Our Chief Executive Officer provides the compensation committee and the board of directors with a detailed review of the performance of our executive officers for the year and then makes recommendations to the compensation committee for each element of compensation. Using his detailed evaluation of each executive’s performance and taking into consideration historical compensation awards to our executives and named executive officers and our corporate performance during the year as well as the executive’s individual performance and impact, these recommendations include base salary adjustments, target annual bonus opportunities for the subsequent year, actual bonus payments for the year, and long-term incentives in the form of equity awards for each of our executives (other than himself). The compensation committee then reviews these recommendations and considers the factors described above and makes recommendations to the board of directors as to the total direct compensation of each executive, as well as each individual compensation element.
While the compensation committee considers our Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations, as well as the competitive market analysis prepared by its compensation consultant, these recommendations and market data serve as only two of several factors in making its decisions with respect to the compensation of our executives. Ultimately, the compensation committee applies its own business judgment and experience to determine the individual compensation elements and amount of each element for our executives. Moreover, no executive participates in the determination of the amounts or elements of his or her own compensation.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
Pursuant to its charter, the compensation committee has the authority to engage its own legal counsel and other advisors, including compensation consultants, as determined in its sole discretion, to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities. The compensation committee makes all determinations regarding the engagement, fees, and services of these advisors, and any such advisor reports directly to the compensation committee.
For fiscal 2024, the compensation committee engaged Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”), a national compensation consulting firm, to provide information, analysis, and other assistance relating to our executive compensation program on an ongoing basis. The nature and scope of the services provided to the compensation committee by Meridian were as follows:
|
• |
|
assist in developing a relevant group of peer companies to help our compensation committee determine the appropriate level of overall compensation for our executives; |
-34-
related to our initial public offering, and will be measured based on the sum of our total market capitalization as of the applicable measurement date, based on the average closing trading price of one share of our common stock over the 60 day period ending on the day prior to such measurement date, less the aggregate value of all cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities held by us on the applicable measurement date.
On February 27, 2025, the compensation committee determined that performance criteria under the CEO 2021 Performance RSU Award were partially satisfied (measured as of December 31, 2024), such that the award vested as to 668,416 shares. The unvested portion of the award remains outstanding.
CEO 2023 Performance RSU Award. On January 3, 2023, we granted Mr. Elghandour an award of restricted stock units covering 495,000 shares of our common stock, subject to the terms and conditions of our 2022 Plan and a restricted stock unit award agreement thereunder (the “CEO 2023 Performance RSU Award”). The CEO 2023 Performance RSU Award will vest pursuant to a service component and a performance component. The service component will be satisfied if Mr. Elghandour remains a service provider through the date that our board of directors determines that the applicable performance component is satisfied. The performance component will be satisfied upon our achievement of a company value, as defined in the award agreement underlying the CEO 2023 Performance RSU Award, as follows: upon achievement of a company value that is equal to $2,500,000,000, or the minimum threshold, 1/6th of the shares subject to the CEO 2023 Performance RSU Award will vest; upon achievement of a company value that is equal to or greater than $5,000,000,000, or the maximum threshold, 100% of the shares subject to the CEO 2023 Performance RSU Award will vest; and upon achievement of a company value that is between the minimum threshold and the maximum threshold, a portion of the shares subject to the CEO 2023 Performance RSU Award will vest between 1/6th and 100% based on straight line linear interpolation. Company value will be measured either (i) on a change in control (as defined in our 2022 Plan) based on the aggregate amount of deal consideration paid at the closing of such change in control by an acquirer for our shares of common stock or (ii) on June 30 and December 31 of each year, and will be measured based on the sum of our total market capitalization as of the applicable measurement date, based on the average closing trading price of one share of our common stock over the 60 day period ending on the day prior to such measurement date, less the aggregate value of all cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities held by us on the applicable measurement date.
On February 27, 2025, the compensation committee determined that performance criteria under the CEO 2023 Performance RSU Award were partially satisfied (measured as of December 31, 2024), such that the award vested as to 347,255 shares. The unvested portion of the award remains outstanding.
Michelle Gilson
We entered into an employment offer letter with Ms. Gilson, our Chief Financial Officer, effective May 23, 2022. The employment offer letter has no specific term and provides for at-will employment. Ms. Gilson’s current annual base salary is $515,000 (compared to $475,000 in 2024) and her annual target bonus is 45% of her annual base salary.
Ms. Gilson will also be eligible to receive certain severance benefits upon an involuntary termination pursuant to a Change in Control and Severance Agreement she has entered into with us, as described in more detail below under the section titled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”
Christopher Heery, M.D.
In connection with our initial public offering, we entered into a confirmatory employment letter with Dr. Heery, our Chief Medical Officer, effective January 31, 2022. The confirmatory employment letter has no specific term and provides for at-will employment. Dr. Heery’s current annual base salary is $500,000 (compared to $480,000 in 2024) and his annual target bonus is 45% of his annual base salary.
-49-
named executive officer will receive such payment as would entitle such executive to receive the greatest after-tax benefit, even if it means that we pay such executive a lower aggregate payment so as to minimize or eliminate the potential excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code.
2022 Equity Incentive Plan
Our 2022 Plan provides that in the event of a merger or change in control, as defined under our 2022 Plan, each outstanding award will be treated as the administrator determines. The administrator will not be required to treat all awards or portions thereof the vested and unvested portions of an award, or all participants similarly.
In the event that a successor corporation or its parent or subsidiary does not continue an outstanding award, then such award will fully vest, all restrictions on such award will lapse, all performance goals or other vesting criteria applicable to such award will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels, and such award will become fully exercisable, if applicable, for a specified period prior to the transaction, unless specifically provided for otherwise under the applicable award agreement or other written agreement with the participant. The award will then terminate upon the expiration of the specified period of time. If an option or stock appreciation right is not continued, the administrator will notify the participant in writing or electronically that such option or stock appreciation right will be exercisable for a period of time determined by the administrator in its sole discretion and the option or stock appreciation right will terminate upon the expiration of such period.
With respect to awards granted to an outside director, in the event of a change in control, all of his or her options and stock appreciation rights, if any, will vest fully and become immediately exercisable, all restrictions on his or her restricted stock and RSUs will lapse, and all performance goals or other vesting requirements for his or her performance awards will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels, and all other terms and conditions met.
2017 Equity Incentive Plan
Our 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”) provides that in the event of our merger with or into another corporation or entity or a “change in control” (as defined in our 2017 Plan), each outstanding award will be treated as the administrator determines. The administrator will not be obligated to treat all awards, all awards a participant holds, or all awards of the same type similarly.
In the event that the successor corporation does not assume or substitute for an award (or portion thereof), the participant will fully vest in and have the right to exercise all of his or her outstanding options and stock appreciation rights, including shares as to which such awards would not otherwise be vested or exercisable, all restrictions on restricted stock and restricted stock units will lapse, and, with respect to awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at one hundred percent (100%) of target levels and all other terms and conditions met. In addition, if an option or stock appreciation right is not assumed or substituted in the event of a merger or change in control, the administrator will notify the participant in writing or electronically that the option or stock appreciation right will be exercisable for a period of time determined by the administrator in its sole discretion, and the option or stock appreciation right will terminate upon the expiration of such period.
-51-
Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)
|
12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2024 |
Dec. 31, 2023 |
Dec. 31, 2022 |
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table |
Pay versus Performance Disclosure As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between “compensation actually paid” to our Chief Executive Officer (CEO or PEO) and to our other Named Executive Officers (NEOs) and certain financial performance of the company. Compensation actually paid, as determined under SEC requirements, does not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our executive officers during a covered fiscal year. Pay versus Performance Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on TSR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table (SCT) Total Compensation for PEO |
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO 2,3 |
|
|
Average SCT Total Compensation for Other NEOs |
|
|
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Other NEOs 3,4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return 6 |
|
|
|
|
2024 |
|
$ |
21,402,668 |
|
|
$ |
48,286,219 |
|
|
$ |
6,891,833 |
|
|
$ |
14,218,188 |
|
|
$ |
456.49 |
|
|
$ |
105.72 |
|
|
($ |
107.3 |
) |
2023 |
|
$ |
24,964,306 |
|
|
$ |
97,119,440 |
|
|
$ |
3,706,450 |
|
|
$ |
12,737,881 |
|
|
$ |
330.36 |
|
|
$ |
108.41 |
|
|
($ |
70.7 |
) |
2022 |
|
$ |
14,120,246 |
|
|
$ |
62,125,070 |
|
|
$ |
3,514,650 |
|
|
$ |
10,199,276 |
|
|
$ |
184.40 |
|
|
$ |
108.92 |
|
|
($ |
188.7 |
) |
1. |
The CEO and other NEOs for the indicated years were as follows: (i) for 2024, our CEO was Rami Elghandour and our other NEOs were Michelle Gilson and Christopher Heery, (ii) for 2023, our CEO was Rami Elghandour and our other NEOs were Michelle Gilson and Christopher Heery, and (iii) for 2022, our CEO was Rami Elghandour and our other NEOs were Michelle Gilson and Christopher Heery. |
2. |
Amounts reported in this column are based on total compensation reported for our CEO in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal years and adjusted as shown in the tables below. Fair value of equity awards was computed in accordance with the Company’s methodology used for financial reporting purposes. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of such awards are set forth in Note 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. Compensation actually paid does not mean that our CEO was actually paid those amounts in the listed year, but this is a dollar amount derived from the starting point of Summary Compensation Table total compensation under the methodology prescribed under the SEC’s rules, as shown in the adjustment table below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total |
|
|
Adjustment to Summary Compensation Table Total a |
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid |
|
2024 |
|
$ |
21,402,668 |
|
|
$ |
26,883,551 |
|
|
$ |
48,286,219 |
|
2023 |
|
$ |
24,964,306 |
|
|
$ |
72,155,134 |
|
|
$ |
97,119,440 |
|
2022 |
|
$ |
14,120,246 |
|
|
$ |
48,004,824 |
|
|
$ |
62,125,070 |
| The above table reconciles the CEO Summary Compensation Table total to Compensation Actually Paid for the periods indicated.
|
a |
See table below for calculation of Adjustment to Summary Compensation Table Total. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduction of Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards in Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
Addition of Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During the Covered Fiscal Year That are Outstanding and Unvested at Fiscal Year End |
|
|
Addition (Deduction) of Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards |
|
|
Addition (Deduction) of Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Covered Fiscal Year |
|
|
Addition (Deduction) of Change in Fair Value between the End of the Prior Fiscal Year and the Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Vested in the Covered Fiscal Year |
|
|
Adjustment to Summary Compensation Table Total |
|
2024 |
|
($ |
20,192,220 |
) |
|
$ |
24,481,461 |
|
|
$ |
15,222,094 |
|
|
$ |
3,361,365 |
|
|
$ |
4,010,851 |
|
|
$ |
26,883,551 |
|
2023 |
|
($ |
24,022,636 |
) |
|
$ |
42,899,992 |
|
|
$ |
44,863,788 |
|
|
$ |
1,744,730 |
|
|
$ |
6,669,260 |
|
|
$ |
72,155,134 |
|
2022 |
|
($ |
13,095,508 |
) |
|
$ |
25,171,607 |
|
|
$ |
27,143,638 |
|
|
$ |
2,447,717 |
|
|
$ |
6,337,370 |
|
|
$ |
48,004,824 |
| The above table shows the additions and deductions from Summary Compensation Table for purposes of determining CEO CAP for each indicated fiscal year.
3. |
The numbers in these columns have been revised from the numbers previously reported in last year’s “Pay versus Performance Table” to correct an administrative error. |
4. |
Amounts reported in this column are based on the average of the total compensation reported for our other NEOs in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal years and adjusted as shown in the tables below. Fair value of equity awards was computed in accordance with the Company’s methodology used for financial reporting purposes. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of such awards are set forth in Note 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. Compensation actually paid does not mean that these NEOs were actually paid those amounts in the listed year, but this is a dollar amount derived from the starting point of the Summary Compensation Table total compensation under the methodology prescribed under the SEC’s rules, as shown in the adjustment table below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Summary Compensation Table Total |
|
|
Adjustment to Average Summary Compensation Table Total a |
|
|
Average Compensation Actually Paid |
|
2024 |
|
$ |
6,891,833 |
|
|
$ |
7,326,355 |
|
|
$ |
14,218,188 |
|
2023 |
|
$ |
3,706,450 |
|
|
$ |
9,031,431 |
|
|
$ |
12,737,881 |
|
2022 |
|
$ |
3,514,650 |
|
|
$ |
6,684,626 |
|
|
$ |
10,199,276 |
| The above table reconciles the non-CEO NEO’s Average Summary Compensation Table total to Compensation Actually Paid for the periods indicated.
|
a |
See table below for calculation of Adjustment to Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-CEO NEOs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduction of Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards in Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
Addition of Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During the Covered Fiscal Year That are Outstanding and Unvested at Fiscal Year End |
|
|
Addition (Deduction) of Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards |
|
|
Addition (Deduction) of Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Covered Fiscal Year |
|
|
Addition (Deduction) of Change in Fair Value between the End of the Prior Fiscal Year and the Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Vested in the Covered Fiscal Year |
|
|
Adjustment to Average Summary Compensation Table Total |
|
2024 |
|
($ |
6,101,576 |
) |
|
$ |
7,397,673 |
|
|
$ |
3,593,753 |
|
|
$ |
1,015,725 |
|
|
$ |
1,420,780 |
|
|
$ |
7,326,355 |
|
2023 |
|
($ |
3,063,352 |
) |
|
$ |
5,219,997 |
|
|
$ |
5,350,606 |
|
|
$ |
523,427 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,753 |
|
|
$ |
9,031,431 |
|
2022 |
|
($ |
2,920,421 |
) |
|
$ |
6,904,083 |
|
|
$ |
1,877,378 |
|
|
$ |
393,101 |
|
|
$ |
430,485 |
|
|
$ |
6,684,626 |
| The above table includes supplemental data for the additions and deductions resulting in the equity component of Non-CEO NEOs Average.
5. |
Total shareholder return is calculated by assuming that a $100 investment was made at the close of trading on the first full day of trading of our stock (February 4, 2022) and reinvesting all dividends until the last day of each reported fiscal year. |
6. |
The peer group used in this disclosure is the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index, which is the same peer group used in Arcellx’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. Total shareholder return is calculated by assuming that a $100 investment was made at the close of trading on the first full day of trading of our stock (February 4, 2022) and reinvesting all dividends until the last day of each reported fiscal year. |
7. |
The dollar amounts reported are the Company’s net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements. |
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers, Footnote |
The CEO and other NEOs for the indicated years were as follows: (i) for 2024, our CEO was Rami Elghandour and our other NEOs were Michelle Gilson and Christopher Heery, (ii) for 2023, our CEO was Rami Elghandour and our other NEOs were Michelle Gilson and Christopher Heery, and (iii) for 2022, our CEO was Rami Elghandour and our other NEOs were Michelle Gilson and Christopher Heery.
|
|
|
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote |
The peer group used in this disclosure is the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index, which is the same peer group used in Arcellx’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. Total shareholder return is calculated by assuming that a $100 investment was made at the close of trading on the first full day of trading of our stock (February 4, 2022) and reinvesting all dividends until the last day of each reported fiscal year.
|
|
|
PEO Total Compensation Amount |
$ 21,402,668
|
$ 24,964,306
|
$ 14,120,246
|
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount |
$ 48,286,219
|
97,119,440
|
62,125,070
|
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote |
2. |
Amounts reported in this column are based on total compensation reported for our CEO in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal years and adjusted as shown in the tables below. Fair value of equity awards was computed in accordance with the Company’s methodology used for financial reporting purposes. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of such awards are set forth in Note 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. Compensation actually paid does not mean that our CEO was actually paid those amounts in the listed year, but this is a dollar amount derived from the starting point of Summary Compensation Table total compensation under the methodology prescribed under the SEC’s rules, as shown in the adjustment table below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total |
|
|
Adjustment to Summary Compensation Table Total a |
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid |
|
2024 |
|
$ |
21,402,668 |
|
|
$ |
26,883,551 |
|
|
$ |
48,286,219 |
|
2023 |
|
$ |
24,964,306 |
|
|
$ |
72,155,134 |
|
|
$ |
97,119,440 |
|
2022 |
|
$ |
14,120,246 |
|
|
$ |
48,004,824 |
|
|
$ |
62,125,070 |
| The above table reconciles the CEO Summary Compensation Table total to Compensation Actually Paid for the periods indicated.
|
a |
See table below for calculation of Adjustment to Summary Compensation Table Total. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduction of Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards in Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
Addition of Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During the Covered Fiscal Year That are Outstanding and Unvested at Fiscal Year End |
|
|
Addition (Deduction) of Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards |
|
|
Addition (Deduction) of Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Covered Fiscal Year |
|
|
Addition (Deduction) of Change in Fair Value between the End of the Prior Fiscal Year and the Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Vested in the Covered Fiscal Year |
|
|
Adjustment to Summary Compensation Table Total |
|
2024 |
|
($ |
20,192,220 |
) |
|
$ |
24,481,461 |
|
|
$ |
15,222,094 |
|
|
$ |
3,361,365 |
|
|
$ |
4,010,851 |
|
|
$ |
26,883,551 |
|
2023 |
|
($ |
24,022,636 |
) |
|
$ |
42,899,992 |
|
|
$ |
44,863,788 |
|
|
$ |
1,744,730 |
|
|
$ |
6,669,260 |
|
|
$ |
72,155,134 |
|
2022 |
|
($ |
13,095,508 |
) |
|
$ |
25,171,607 |
|
|
$ |
27,143,638 |
|
|
$ |
2,447,717 |
|
|
$ |
6,337,370 |
|
|
$ |
48,004,824 |
| The above table shows the additions and deductions from Summary Compensation Table for purposes of determining CEO CAP for each indicated fiscal year.
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount |
$ 6,891,833
|
3,706,450
|
3,514,650
|
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount |
$ 14,218,188
|
12,737,881
|
10,199,276
|
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote |
4. |
Amounts reported in this column are based on the average of the total compensation reported for our other NEOs in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal years and adjusted as shown in the tables below. Fair value of equity awards was computed in accordance with the Company’s methodology used for financial reporting purposes. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of such awards are set forth in Note 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. Compensation actually paid does not mean that these NEOs were actually paid those amounts in the listed year, but this is a dollar amount derived from the starting point of the Summary Compensation Table total compensation under the methodology prescribed under the SEC’s rules, as shown in the adjustment table below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Summary Compensation Table Total |
|
|
Adjustment to Average Summary Compensation Table Total a |
|
|
Average Compensation Actually Paid |
|
2024 |
|
$ |
6,891,833 |
|
|
$ |
7,326,355 |
|
|
$ |
14,218,188 |
|
2023 |
|
$ |
3,706,450 |
|
|
$ |
9,031,431 |
|
|
$ |
12,737,881 |
|
2022 |
|
$ |
3,514,650 |
|
|
$ |
6,684,626 |
|
|
$ |
10,199,276 |
| The above table reconciles the non-CEO NEO’s Average Summary Compensation Table total to Compensation Actually Paid for the periods indicated.
|
a |
See table below for calculation of Adjustment to Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-CEO NEOs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduction of Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards in Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
Addition of Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During the Covered Fiscal Year That are Outstanding and Unvested at Fiscal Year End |
|
|
Addition (Deduction) of Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards |
|
|
Addition (Deduction) of Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Covered Fiscal Year |
|
|
Addition (Deduction) of Change in Fair Value between the End of the Prior Fiscal Year and the Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Vested in the Covered Fiscal Year |
|
|
Adjustment to Average Summary Compensation Table Total |
|
2024 |
|
($ |
6,101,576 |
) |
|
$ |
7,397,673 |
|
|
$ |
3,593,753 |
|
|
$ |
1,015,725 |
|
|
$ |
1,420,780 |
|
|
$ |
7,326,355 |
|
2023 |
|
($ |
3,063,352 |
) |
|
$ |
5,219,997 |
|
|
$ |
5,350,606 |
|
|
$ |
523,427 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,753 |
|
|
$ |
9,031,431 |
|
2022 |
|
($ |
2,920,421 |
) |
|
$ |
6,904,083 |
|
|
$ |
1,877,378 |
|
|
$ |
393,101 |
|
|
$ |
430,485 |
|
|
$ |
6,684,626 |
| The above table includes supplemental data for the additions and deductions resulting in the equity component of Non-CEO NEOs Average.
|
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return |
|
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income |
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return Amount |
$ 456.49
|
330.36
|
184.4
|
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount |
105.72
|
108.41
|
108.92
|
Net Income (Loss) |
$ (107,300,000)
|
(70,700,000)
|
(188,700,000)
|
PEO Name |
Rami Elghandour
|
|
|
PEO | Equity Awards Adjustments |
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
$ 26,883,551
|
72,155,134
|
48,004,824
|
PEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
(20,192,220)
|
(24,022,636)
|
(13,095,508)
|
PEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested |
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
24,481,461
|
42,899,992
|
25,171,607
|
PEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested |
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
15,222,094
|
44,863,788
|
27,143,638
|
PEO | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year |
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
3,361,365
|
1,744,730
|
2,447,717
|
PEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year |
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
4,010,851
|
6,669,260
|
6,337,370
|
Non-PEO NEO | Equity Awards Adjustments |
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
7,326,355
|
9,031,431
|
6,684,626
|
Non-PEO NEO | Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Award Amounts Reported in Summary Compensation Table |
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
(6,101,576)
|
(3,063,352)
|
(2,920,421)
|
Non-PEO NEO | Year-end Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year that are Outstanding and Unvested |
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
7,397,673
|
5,219,997
|
6,904,083
|
Non-PEO NEO | Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years That are Outstanding and Unvested |
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
3,593,753
|
5,350,606
|
1,877,378
|
Non-PEO NEO | Vesting Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in Covered Year |
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
1,015,725
|
523,427
|
393,101
|
Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Prior Year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year |
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
$ 1,420,780
|
$ 1,000,753
|
$ 430,485
|