Changes in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
On March 7, 2019, we engaged BDO as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2019, and we dismissed Wolf. The decision to change accountants was approved by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. The report of Wolf on our consolidated financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor was it qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that our financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2107 expressed, in an explanatory paragraph, substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern due to recurring losses from operations. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the subsequent
interim period through March 7, 2019, there were no: (1) disagreements (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation
S-K
and the related instructions) with Wolf on any matter of accounting
principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreement if not resolved to the satisfaction of Wolf would have caused Wolf to make reference thereto in its reports on the consolidated financial
statements for such years, or (2) reportable events (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation
S-K).
During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the subsequent interim period through March 7, 2019, neither we nor anyone on
our behalf consulted with BDO regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements, and neither a written
report nor oral advice was provided to us that BDO concluded was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a
disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation
S-K
and the related instructions) or a reportable event (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation
S-K).
On September 20, 2017, we engaged Wolf as our independent registered public accounting
firm to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and we dismissed MaloneBailey. Prior to the completion of the Merger, Wolf served as the auditor and independent registered public accounting firm to Private
Acer. The decision to change accountants was approved by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. The report of MaloneBailey on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 did not contain an adverse opinion
or disclaimer of opinion, nor was it qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 expressed, in an explanatory paragraph,
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern due to recurring losses, negative operating cash flows and an accumulated deficit. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no: (1) disagreements (as
defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation
S-K
and the related instructions) with MaloneBailey on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or
procedures, which disagreement if not resolved to the satisfaction of MaloneBailey would have caused MaloneBailey to make reference thereto in its reports, or (2) reportable events (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation
S-K).
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, neither we nor anyone on our behalf
consulted with Wolf regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements, and neither a written report
nor oral advice was provided to us that Wolf concluded was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement
(as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation
S-K
and the related instructions) or a reportable event (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation
S-K).
Policy on Audit Committee
Pre-Approval
and Permissible
Non-Audit
Services
of Independent Auditors
The Boards policy is to
pre-approve
all audit and permissible
non-audit
services provided by the independent auditors. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other
16