Fortnite' Maker Asks Judge Again to Return Game to Apple's App Store
September 05 2020 - 12:02PM
Dow Jones News
By Sarah E. Needleman
The creator of "Fortnite" is taking another stab at getting a
judge to bring the popular game back to Apple Inc.'s devices, this
time disclosing that roughly a third of players access it through
the tech giant's App Store.
Epic Games Inc. late Friday filed a preliminary injunction
against Apple, reiterating arguments made in a federal lawsuit last
month when it accused the tech giant of monopolistic behavior after
pulling "Fortnite" from the App Store. The closely held software
developer also sued Google for removing the game from its Google
Play store the same day.
Apple and Google made that move after Epic introduced an in-game
payment system that would skirt the 30% fee certain developers are
required to pay the companies for in-app purchases.
Epic said that more than 116 million registered "Fortnite"
players have accessed the survival-shooter game through a device
running Apple's iOS operating system, making it the game's largest
platform. Of those players, Epic said 63% only play "Fortnite" this
way. The game has 350 million registered players overall, according
to Epic.
"Apple has driven a stake in the 'Fortnite' community," Epic
said in its filing.
Apple declined to comment Saturday on Epic's latest filing.
Apple has previously said Epic has put customers in the middle of
their fight and that it hopes to work with the software developer
in the future.
Epic's new filing comes ahead of a hearing scheduled Sept. 28 on
its broader case, which seeks an end to what it describes as
anticompetitive conduct with how Apple operates its App Store.
The dispute is the latest tussle between companies and
app-marketplace operators. Companies including Facebook Inc.,
Microsoft Corp., and Spotify Technology SA have been critical of
Apple and the commission it charges software developers.
Though "Fortnite" can be played on mobile devices as well as
gaming consoles and computers, Epic said Apple's moves have
irreparably harmed its business.
Apple and Google have defended their business practices, saying
the commission fees are necessary because of the services the
stores provide, including security and safeguarding user privacy.
Apple has also said its 30% commission is the same amount that most
other app marketplaces charge.
A California federal judge ruled Aug. 24 that Epic can maintain
access to Apple's software-development tools needed to update its
Unreal Engine, but that "Fortnite" would remain out of the App
Store.
"Epic's renewed push for the same thing as last month will most
likely result in the same mixed ruling again," said Florian
Mueller, an independent analyst in Munich focused on antitrust
issues. "Apple won't have to tolerate an alternative payment system
in 'Fortnite,' but Epic will retain access to Apple's developer
tools to improve and maintain its Unreal Engine."
Beyond "Fortnite," Apple later removed Epic's games like "Battle
Breakers," "Spyjinx" and "Shadow Complex Remastered" from iOS and
Mac app stores.
Epic, which launched a public-relations campaign critical of
Apple along with its lawsuit, has since continued to urge players
and other game developers to take its side. The company is valued
at more than $17 billion and has said it is committed to the fight,
but the dispute could cost more than legal fees.
While "Fortnite" is free to play, Epic sells virtual goods
inside it such as character costumes and special modes. In July,
the shooter-survival game generated about $52.5 million of in-app
spending through the App Store and Google Play combined, according
to estimates from research firm Sensor Tower Inc. "The continued
loss of 'Fortnite' as a gathering place for users on all platforms
will lead Epic's customers to defect," Epic said in its filing
Friday.
Epic's battle with Apple comes as the Justice Department is
investigating Apple over antitrust concerns surrounding its App
Store. Even so, some legal experts say Epic is facing an uphill
battle.
"Apple has chosen to impose a 30% commission at the app-use
level rather than extracting those revenues from the iPhone
purchase," said Paul Swanson, a Denver-based antitrust lawyer at
Holland & Hart LLP. "I don't think antitrust prohibits that
choice any more than it would prohibit a club from imposing
whatever cover charge it chooses and then charging whatever it
wants for drinks within the club."
Write to Sarah E. Needleman at sarah.needleman@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
September 05, 2020 11:47 ET (15:47 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024