Vikram Pandit led Citigroup (C) throughout the
financial crisis and was a well-known example of how badly things
went for many of the big banks during this troubled time. Yet,
Citigroup, unlike some of its competitors, just barely survived and
now appears to be nearly on its feet again.
Although the company has come back a little and seems poised to
be a global player in finance once more, it looks as though it will
not be with Pandit at the helm, as he has stepped down as the CEO
of the company. This marks a nearly five year tenure at the firm
which was rocked by incredible events, a nearly 90% share price
slump, and then the resurrection of the firm and the resumption of
dividend payments as well (see Three Financial ETFs That Avoid Big
Bank Stocks).
Still after all this and the apparent return of Citi as a major
player, Pandit said, in a CNBC interview, that he felt as though
now was the time to leave since Citi had stabilized their
operations and is now in a decent position post-financial crisis.
However, others are reporting that he was forced out either over
pay differences or due to clashing strategy ideas, a strong
possibility given the strange timing of the announcement just a day
after the earnings call.
Yet even with the shakeup, many analysts remain relatively
bullish on the company. The firm currently has a Zacks Rank of 3 or
‘hold’ while the industry rank is relatively favorable coming in
the top 20% (also see Beware These Three Volatile Financial
ETFs).
Furthermore, some are forecasting that the departure of Pandit
will allow the company to either breakup into more profitable
pieces or it will allow the firm to get back to its roots and do
what it has done best historically. Either way, it appears as
though the market doesn’t exactly hate the move, as the firm’s
stock was up slightly over 1.5% in the day of the announcement.
With that being said, the company is certainly heading into a
bit of uncertainty, especially given the strange timing and
circumstances surrounding Vikram’s departure from the firm. Given
this, some might want to reevaluate some of their investments in
the financial sector as we learn more about how this $100 billion
market cap firm will proceed now that it is without Pandit for the
first time in half a decade.
A look at portfolio allocations could be especially important
from an ETF perspective, as the company makes up a decent
percentage of most financial products, and a sizable chunk of many
more specialized funds in the financial ETF world. In fact, data
from XTF.com suggests that over 100 ETFs hold Citigroup in their
baskets while almost 3% of all of the company’s shares are held by
these exchange-traded funds (read Does Your Portfolio Need a
Financial ETF?).
Below, we highlight in brief detail the three ETFs which
allocate the biggest percentage of their assets to Citigroup. While
none of these are in danger at this time, all three put more than
7.5% of their assets in the company, suggesting that if you are
holding or considering any of the following funds, you should be
paying greater attention to the still unfolding situation at
Citigroup:
Dow Jones US Financial Services Index Fund (IYG)
- This fund tracks a broad benchmark of American financial
corporations, holding just over 100 stocks in its basket. Currently
Citi takes the third biggest holding in the fund, accounting for
just over 7.5% of assets.
The product is relatively popular among investors having amassed
over $200 million in AUM while charging 47 basis points a year in
fees. In terms of performance, YTD the product has been quite
strong, adding about 23% in the time period while paying out a
yield just over 1.1%. Currently, the fund has a Zacks ETF Rank of 3
or ‘hold’ (see Three Financial ETFs Outperforming XLF).
RevenueShares Financial Sector Fund (RWW) - For
a different approach to the financial sector, investors have RWW
which takes a revenue-weighted approach. With this technique, firms
with the biggest amounts of revenue have the biggest weight in the
ETF, giving third biggest allocation (tied with JPM) to Citi with
7.8% of assets.
Despite its unique methodology, the fund hasn’t really caught on
with investors, as the product has low assets and daily volume,
suggesting a wider bid ask spread than others on the list. Still,
the fund has performed admirably in 2012, adding more than 27% in
the time period while yielding a little less than 0.7%.
Additionally, the fund has a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 or ‘Buy’, beating
out IYG from that perspective (read Do ex-Financial Funds Make
Safer Dividend ETFs?).
PowerShares KBW Bank Portfolio (KBWB) - This
fund takes a modified market cap approach to banking stocks that
are traded in the U.S., holding 24 stocks in its basket in total.
At time of writing, Citigroup was the second biggest holding in the
fund at 8.1% of assets, just trailing BAC and barely beating out
JPM.
The product has attracted a decent following among investors as
it has over $125 million in AUM and it does volume of about 420,000
shares on a daily basis. The product is also the cheapest of the
three on the list, though its performance in 2012 has been in
between the others, adding 24.5% while paying out a 1.65% from a 30
Day SEC perspective. Much like RWW, KBWB also has a Zacks ETF Rank
of 2 or ‘Buy’.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research?
Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30
Days. Click to get this free report >>
Follow @Eric Dutram on Twitter
CITIGROUP INC (C): Free Stock Analysis Report
ISHARS-DJ FN SV (IYG): ETF Research Reports
PWRSH-KBW BP (KBWB): ETF Research Reports
REVENU-FINL SEC (RWW): ETF Research Reports
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
Zacks Investment Research
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research?
Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click
to get this free report
iShares US Financial Ser... (AMEX:IYG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2024 to Oct 2024
iShares US Financial Ser... (AMEX:IYG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2023 to Oct 2024