AIKI Alkido Pharma Inc

Item 1. Financial Statements

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

SPHERIX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES  

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  

($ in thousands)  

(Unaudited) 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

Note 1. Organization and Description of Business

Organization and Description of Business

Spherix Incorporated (the “Company”) is an intellectual property company incorporated in the State of Delaware that owns patented and unpatented intellectual property.  The Company was formed in 1967 as a scientific research company and for much of its history pursued drug development including through Phase III clinical studies which were discontinued.  Through the Company’s acquisition of patents and patent applications developed by Nortel Networks Corporation from Rockstar Consortium US, LP (“Rockstar”) and Harris Corporation from North South Holdings Inc. (“North South”) in 2013, the Company has expanded its activities. 

The Company is a patent commercialization company focused on generating revenues from the monetization of intellectual property, or IP. Such monetization includes, but is not limited to, acquiring IP from patent holders in order to maximize the value of the patent holdings by conducting and managing a licensing campaign, or through the settlement and litigation of patents. We intend to generate revenues and related cash flows from the granting of intellectual property rights for the use of patented technologies that we own, that we manage for others, or that others manage on our behalf. To date, we have generated minimal revenues and no assurance can be provided that our business model will be successful.

In addition to our patent monetization efforts, since the fourth quarter of 2017, we have been transitioning to focus our efforts as a technology development company. The Company made no investments in new IP during 2017 and started the transition with its investment in Hoth Therapeutics, Inc. during the third quarter of 2017.

In March 2018, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger, subject to shareholder approval, with DatChat, Inc. (the “DatChat Merger”), a secure messaging application that utilizes blockchain technology, as amended on May 3, 2018. After further negotiations, the Company determined not to pursue a merger with DatChat and on August 8, 2018, entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with DatChat pursuant to which the Company and DatChat agreed to terminate the DatChat Merger and the Company agreed to make a $1,000,000 strategic investment in DatChat which consisted of (a) a cash payment of $500,000, (b) the forgiveness of prior advances made to DatChat by the Company, and (c) an obligation of the Company to pay certain specific future compensation expenses of DatChat (amounts in clauses (b) and (c) not to exceed a maximum of $500,000 in the aggregate); in exchange for $1,000,000 of restricted shares of DatChat common stock which is equal to 3.6% of the issued and outstanding common stock of DatChat.

Note 2. Liquidity and Financial Condition

The Company continues to incur ongoing administrative and other expenses, including public company expenses, in excess of corresponding (non-financing related) revenue. While the Company continues to implement its business strategy, it intends to finance its activities through:

Management believes the Company currently has sufficient funds to meet its operating requirements for at least the next twelve months.

The Company’s ultimate success is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing and generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis.  The Company’s business will require significant amounts of capital to sustain operations and make the investments it needs to execute its longer-term business plan to support new technologies and help advance innovation. The Company’s working capital amounted to approximately $3.8 million at June 30, 2018. Absent generation of sufficient revenue from the execution of the Company’s long-term business plan, the Company will need to obtain additional debt or equity financing, especially if the Company experiences downturns in its business that are more severe or longer than anticipated, or if the Company experiences significant increases in expense levels resulting from being a publicly-traded company or operations.  If the Company attempts to obtain additional debt or equity financing, the Company cannot assume that such financing will be available to the Company on favorable terms, or at all.

Disputes regarding the assertion of patents and other intellectual property rights are highly complex and technical. The Company may be forced to litigate against others to enforce or defend its intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and scope of other parties’ proprietary rights. The defendants or other third parties involved in the lawsuits in which the Company is involved may allege defenses and/or file counterclaims or initiate inter-party reviews in an effort to avoid or limit liability and damages for patent infringement or cause the Company to incur additional costs as a strategy.  If such efforts are successful, they may have an impact on the value of the patents and preclude the Company from deriving revenue from the patents. The patents could be declared invalid by a court or the United States Patent and Trademark Office, in whole or in part, or the costs of the Company can increase. Recent rulings also create an increased risk that if the Company is unsuccessful in litigation it could be responsible to pay the attorneys’ fees and other costs of defendants by lowering the standard for legal fee shifting sought by defendants in patent cases.

Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Nuta Technology Corp. (“Nuta”), Spherix Portfolio Acquisition II, Inc. (“SPXII”), Guidance IP, LLC (“Guidance”), Directional IP, LLC (“Directional”), Spherix Management Services, LLC (“SMS”) and NNPT, LLC (“NNPT”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). This requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the recoverability and useful lives of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation, the valuation of derivative liabilities, the valuation of investments and the valuation allowance related to the Company’s deferred tax assets. Certain of the Company’s estimates, including the carrying amount of the intangible assets, could be affected by external conditions, including those unique to the Company and general economic conditions. It is reasonably possible that these external factors could have an effect on the Company’s estimates and could cause actual results to differ from those estimates and assumptions.

Concentration of Cash

The Company maintains cash balances at two financial institutions in checking accounts and money market accounts. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash and cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had $0.2 million in cash and cash equivalents. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.

Marketable Securities

Marketable securities are classified as trading and are carried at fair value. The Company’s marketable securities consist of corporate bonds and highly liquid mutual funds and exchange-traded & closed-end funds which are valued at quoted market prices.

During the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company incurred realized losses of approximately $0.2 million and $36,000, respectively, and unrealized gains of approximately $41,000 and $66,000, respectively, on its investments in marketable securities, which are included in other income, net on the consolidated statements of operations. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company earned dividend income of approximately $44,000 and $47,000, respectively, which is included in other income, net on the consolidated statement of operations.

During the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company incurred realized losses of approximately $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and unrealized losses of approximately $17,000 and unrealized gains of approximately $0.1 million, respectively, on its investments in marketable securities, which are included in other income, net on the consolidated statements of operations. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company earned dividend income of approximately $78,000 and $55,000, respectively, which is included in other income, net on the consolidated statement of operations.

The realized gain or loss, unrealized gain or loss, and dividend income related to marketable securities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 are as follows ($ in thousands): 

The Company reinvested such dividend income into its marketable securities during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. The fair values of such marketable securities held as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were $4.6 million and $4.0 million, respectively. 

The marketable securities were classified as a Level 2 financial instrument at June 30, 2018 (see Note 7).

Digital Currencies Translations and Remeasurements

The Company accounts for digital currencies, which it considers to be an asset, at their initial cost and subsequently remeasures the carrying amounts of digital currencies it owns at each reporting date based on their current fair value. The changes in the fair value of digital currencies are included as a component of income or loss. The Company currently classifies digital currencies as a current asset.

The Company obtains the equivalency rate of bitcoins to USD from various exchanges including, Bitstamp, Kraken and Coinbase. Equivalency rate obtained from these sources represents a generally well recognized quoted price in an active market for bitcoins, which market and related database are accessible to the Company on an ongoing basis.

Investment

The Company elected the fair value option for its investment in Hoth Therapeutics, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Hoth”). As of June 30, 2018, the fair value of this investment was $1,700,000. The Company also elected the fair value option for its investment in TheBit Daily LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“TheBit Daily”). As of June 30, 2018, the fair value of this investment was $25,000. These investments were classified as a Level 3 financial instrument at June 30, 2018 (see Note 4).

While the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

The decision to elect the fair value option, which is irrevocable once elected, is determined on an instrument by instrument basis and applied to an entire instrument. The net gains or losses, if any, on an investment for which the fair value option has been elected, are recognized as an unrealized gain on investment in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Net Loss per Share

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net income or loss applicable to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders includes the effect of the deemed capital contribution on extinguishment of preferred stock and the deemed dividend related to the immediate accretion of beneficial conversion feature of convertible preferred stock. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and, if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares consist of the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options (using the treasury stock method) and the conversion of the Company’s convertible preferred stock and warrants (using the if-converted method). Diluted loss per share excludes the shares issuable upon the conversion of preferred stock and the exercise of stock options and warrants from the calculation of net loss per share if their effect would be anti-dilutive.

Securities that could potentially dilute loss per share in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share at Jun e 30, 2018 and 2017 are as follows: 

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. We consider revenue realized or realizable and earned when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement when the services have been provided to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is probable. Our material revenue stream is related to revenue generated from its settlement and licensing agreements. the appropriate recognition of revenue is determined as one performance obligation and revenue is recognized upon delivery of the final performance obligations, including the license for past and future use and the release.

The Company recognizes revenue under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers . The core principle of the new revenue standard is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The following five steps are applied to achieve that core principle:

In order to identify the performance obligations in a contract with a customer, a company must assess the promised goods or services in the contract and identify each promised good or service that is distinct. A performance obligation meets ASC 606’s definition of a “distinct” good or service (or bundle of goods or services) if both of the following criteria are met:

If a good or service is not distinct, the good or service is combined with other promised goods or services until a bundle of goods or services is identified that is distinct.

The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer. The consideration promised in a contract with a customer may include fixed amounts, variable amounts, or both. When determining the transaction price, an entity must consider the effects of all of the following:

Variable consideration is included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.

The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis.

The transaction price allocated to each performance obligation is recognized when that performance obligation is satisfied, at a point in time or over time as appropriate.

As of June 30, 2018, there were no contract assets or liabilities associated with the Company’s settlement and licensing agreements. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company did not generate any revenue.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) , which supersedes FASB ASC Topic 840, Leases (Topic 840) and provides principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both lessees and lessors. The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than twelve months regardless of classification. Leases with a term of twelve months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases. The standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted upon issuance. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception , (ASU 2017-11). Part I of this update addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round features that require fair value measurement of the entire   instrument or conversion option. Part II of this update addresses the difficulty of navigating Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, because of the existence of extensive pending content in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This pending content is the result of the indefinite deferral of accounting requirements about mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests. The amendments in Part II of this update do not have an accounting effect. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of adopting ASU 2017-11 on its financial statements and related disclosures.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07,  Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting  (“ASU 2018-07”). ASU 2018-07 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions resulting from expanding the scope of Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. ASU 2018-07 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year. The Company is currently assessing the effect this guidance may have on its financial statements.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (ASU 2014-09) as modified by ASU No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date,” ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” ASU No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” and ASU No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients.” The revenue recognition principle in ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, new and enhanced disclosures will be required. Companies may adopt the new standard either using the full retrospective approach, a modified retrospective approach with practical expedients, or a cumulative effect upon adoption approach. The Company adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective approach. The Company has determined that its licenses represent functional intellectual property under Topic 606. Therefore, revenue is recognized at the point in time when the customer has the right to use the intellectual property rather than over the license period. Accordingly, the Company’s deferred revenue related to its licenses was eliminated and accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2018 was decreased by approximately $3.2 million so that the Company will not recognize revenue on earnings statements in the future as to its license.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities . ASU No. 2016-01 requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial assets on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; and clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. ASU No. 2016-01 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-01 on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this update did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.  

In May 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting , (ASU 2017-09). ASU 2017-09 provides clarity and reduces both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The amendments in ASU 2017-09 should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted ASU 2017-09 on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Note 4. Investment in Hoth Therapeutics, Inc.

On June 30, 2017 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Hoth Therapeutics, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Hoth”), for the purchase of an aggregate of 6,800,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 (the “Shares”), of Hoth, for a purchase price of $675,000. The Company adopted the fair value option for this investment and recorded changes in fair value in the statement of operations (see Note 7).  

Note 5. Investment in TheBit Daily LLC

On March 23, 2018, Spherix Incorporated purchased 8.0% of the issued and outstanding limited liability company membership interests of TheBit Daily LLC, a development stage media and education platform focused on the blockchain and cryptocurrency space, for a subscription price of $25,000.

The Company adopted the fair value option for this investment and recorded changes in fair value, if any, in the statement of operations (see Note 7).  

The amortization expenses related to acquired intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 are as follows ($ in thousands):

The future amortization of these intangible assets was based on the adjusted carrying amount. Future amortization of all patents is as follows ($ in thousands):

Note 7. Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are carried at cost, which management believes approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

The Company uses three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities 

Level 2 - quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable 

Level 3 - inputs that are unobservable (for example, cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions)

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 ($ in thousands):

There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 during the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Level 2 Valuation Techniques

The fair values of Level 2 marketable securities are determined using one or more quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 Valuation Techniques

Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the warrant liabilities for which there is no current market for these securities such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. Changes in fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are analyzed each period based on changes in estimates or assumptions and recorded as appropriate.

A significant decrease in the volatility or a significant decrease in the Company’s stock price, in isolation, would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement. Changes in the values of the warrant liabilities are recorded in “change in fair value of warrant liabilities” in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

The Series A and Series B warrants have been recorded at their fair value using the Black-Scholes valuation model, and will be recorded at their respective fair value at each subsequent balance sheet date. This model incorporates transaction details such as the Company’s stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as volatility. The warrants require, at the option of the holder, a net-cash settlement following certain fundamental transactions at the Company or require the issuance of registered shares upon exercise, do not expressly preclude an implied right to cash settlement and are therefore accounted for as derivative liabilities.

A summary of quantitative information with respect to the valuation methodology and significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s warrant liabilities that are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy at the date of issuance and as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 is as follows:

The risk-free interest rate was based on rates established by the Federal Reserve. For the July 2015 Warrants, the expected volatility in the Black-Scholes model is based on an expected volatility of 100% for both periods which represents the percentage required to be used when valuing the cash settlement feature as contractually stated in the form of warrant. The general expected volatility is based on standard deviation of the Company’s underlying stock price’s daily logarithmic returns. The expected life of the warrants was determined by the expiration date of the warrants. The expected dividend yield was based upon the fact that the Company has not historically paid dividends on its common stock, and does not expect to pay dividends on its common stock in the future.

The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis ($ in thousands):

The Company owns approximately 33% of common shares in Hoth as of June 30, 2018. The value of the Company’s investment in Hoth increased by approximately $0.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018.

The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

While the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

The decision to elect the fair value option, which is irrevocable once elected, is determined on an instrument by instrument basis and applied to an entire instrument. The net gains or losses, if any, on an investment for which the fair value option has been elected, are recognized as change in fair value of investment in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

A summary of quantitative information with respect to the valuation methodology and significant unobservable inputs used for the Company’s valuation in Hoth that are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy at the date of issuance and as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 is as follows:

The investment in Hoth Therapeutics was valued using a hybrid probability weighted expected return method, with scenarios including (1) Hoth continuing to operate as a private company through an estimated potential exit date, and (2) Hoth undergoing an IPO in the near future. The private-company scenario utilizes a reverse option pricing method (backsolve) based on the recent Series A transaction. Key inputs to the backsolve, in addition to the Series A price, include volatility (75.00%) and expected maturity (1.0 years). The IPO scenario is based on initial value indications proposed by investment bankers. The primary inputs, in addition to the pre-money value indications, include the estimated time to IPO (end of November) and a discount rate of 15%. The valuation conclusion is sensitive to the probability weightings assigned to each scenario. The weightings (1/3 IPO scenario, 2/3 private company scenario), were determined according to management expectations regarding exit opportunities, based on what was known or knowable as of June 30, 2018. 

Note 8. Stockholders’ Equity and Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock

Series D Convertible Preferred Stock

On April 2, 2013, the Company designated 1,488,152 shares of preferred stock as Series D Preferred Stock. In connection with the acquisition of North South’s patent portfolio in September 2013, the Company issued 1,379,685 shares of its Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series D Preferred Stock”) to the stockholders of North South. Each share of Series D Preferred Stock has a stated value of $0.0001 per share and is convertible into ten-nineteenths of a share of Common Stock. Upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company’s business, each holder of Series D Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, for each share of Series D Preferred Stock held, a preferential amount in cash equal to the greater of (i) the stated value or (ii) the amount the holder would receive as a holder of Common Stock on an “as converted” basis. Each holder of Series D Preferred Stock shall be entitled to vote on all matters submitted to its stockholders and shall be entitled to such number of votes equal to the number of shares of Common Stock such shares of Series D Preferred Stock are convertible into at such time, taking into account the beneficial ownership limitations set forth in the governing Certificate of Designation and the conversion limitations described below. At no time may shares of Series D Preferred Stock be converted if such conversion would cause the holder to hold in excess of 4.99% of issued and outstanding Common Stock, subject to an increase in such limitation up to 9.99% of the issued and outstanding Common Stock on 61 days’ written notice to the Company. The conversion ratio of the Series D Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, combination of shares and similar recapitalization transactions.

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, 4,725 shares of Series D Preferred Stock remained issued and outstanding.

Series D-1 Convertible Preferred Stock

On November 20, 2013, the Company designated 1,379,685 shares of preferred stock as Series D-1 Preferred Stock. The Company’s Series D-1 Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series D-1 Preferred Stock”) was established on November 22, 2013. Each share of Series D-1 Preferred Stock has a stated value of $0.0001 per share and is convertible into ten- nineteenths of a share of Common Stock.  Upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company’s business, each holder of Series D-1 Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, for each share of Series D-1 Preferred Stock held, a preferential amount in cash equal to the greater of (i) the stated value or (ii) the amount the holder would receive as a holder of Common Stock on an “as converted” basis.  Each holder of Series D-1 Preferred Stock shall be entitled to vote on all matters submitted to the Company’s stockholders and shall be entitled to such number of votes equal to the number of shares of Common Stock such shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock are convertible into at such time, taking into account the beneficial ownership limitations set forth in the governing Certificate of Designation.  At no time may shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock be converted if such conversion would cause the holder to hold in excess of 9.99% of issued and outstanding Common Stock. The conversion ratio of the Series D-1 Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, combination of shares and similar recapitalization transactions. The Company commenced an exchange with holders of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock pursuant to which the holders of the Company’s outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock acquired in the Merger could exchange such shares for shares of the Company’s Series D-1 Preferred Stock on a one-for-one basis.

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, 834 shares of Series D-1 Preferred Stock remained issued and outstanding.

Common Stock

On March 19, 2018, the Company closed a public offering of common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $3.0 million. The offering was a shelf takedown off of the Company’s registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-222488) and was conducted pursuant to a placement agency agreement (the “Agreement”) between the Company and Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd., the sole placement agent, on a best-efforts basis with respect to the offering (the “Placement Agent”), that was entered into on March 14, 2018. The Company sold 2,222,222 shares of its common stock in the offering at a purchase price of $1.35 per share.  

Stock Options

On February 16, 2018, pursuant to and subject to the available number of shares reserved under the 2014 Plan, the Company issued an aggregate of 150,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company to three of its directors. The aggregate grant date fair value of these options was approximately $0.2 million. These stock options vest over six months.  

On May 3, 2018, a new director was granted options to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exercise price of $1.04 per share, which options vested 50% at May 3, 2018 with the remaining 50% vesting at May 3, 2019. The aggregate grant date fair value of these options was approximately $46,000. These stock options vest over twelve months.  

A summary of option activity under the Company’s employee stock option plan for the six months ended June 30, 2018 is presented below:

A summary of option activity under the Company’s non-employee stock option plan for the six months ended June 30, 2018 is presented below:

Stock-based compensation associated with the amortization of stock option expense was approximately $71,000 and $8,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and was approximately $0.2 million and $11,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  

Restricted Stock Awards

On February 16, 2018, the Company granted each of its three directors 20,000 shares of restricted common stock. The grant date fair value of each restricted stock award was approximately $27,000. These restricted stock awards vested immediately.

On April 26, 2018, the Company issued 25,410 shares of its common stock to an employee for services pursuant to employment agreement. The grant date fair value of this restricted stock award was approximately $27,000 (based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on April 26, 2018). This restricted stock award vested immediately.

Unamortized stock-based compensation expense was approximately $42,000 at June 30, 2018.

Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies   

Legal Proceedings   

In the ordinary course of business, the Company actively pursues legal remedies to enforce its intellectual property rights and to stop unauthorized use of patented technology. From time to time, the Company may be involved in various claims and counterclaims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. There were no pending material claims or legal matters as of the date of this report other than the following matters:

International License Exchange of America, LLC Litigations

Under our Monetization Agreement with Equitable, ILEA filed the patent infringement litigation below.

Optic153 LLC Litigations

Under our Monetization Agreement with Equitable, Optic 153 LLC, an Equitable subsidiary, has filed the following litigations relating to patents acquired under the terms of settlement of one of our prior litigations:

Counterclaims 

In the ordinary course of business, we, or with our wholly-owned subsidiaries or monetization partners, will initiate litigation against parties whom we believe have infringed on our intellectual property rights and technologies. The initiation of such litigation exposes us to potential counterclaims initiated by the defendants. Currently, there are no counterclaims pending against us. In the event such counterclaims are filed, we can provide no assurance that the outcome of these claims will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results from operations.  

Note 10. DatChat, Inc.

The Merger

On March 12, 2018, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Spherix, Spherix Merger Subisdiary Inc., a Nevada corporation and a wholly-owned Subsidiary of Spherix (“Merger Sub”), DatChat, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“DatChat”), and Darin Myman in the capacity as the representative from and after the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”) for the stockholders of DatChat as of immediately prior to the Effective Time (the “Stockholder Representative”).

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, at the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Closing”), Merger Sub would merge with and into DatChat (the “Merger”), with DatChat continuing as the surviving corporation in the Merger. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time: (i) all shares of capital stock of DatChat (the “DatChat Stock”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will be converted into the right to receive 46,153,846 shares of Spherix common stock (the “Stockholder Merger Consideration”).

On May 3, 2018, Spherix, Merger Sub, DatChat and the Stockholder Representative entered into that certain First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Amendment”), pursuant to which the Merger Agreement was amended to reduce the Stockholder Merger Consideration from 46,153,846 shares of Spherix common stock to 34,615,385 shares of Spherix common stock.

After further negotiations, the Company determined not to pursue a merger with DatChat and on August 8, 2018, entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with DatChat pursuant to which the Company and DatChat agreed to terminate the DatChat Merger and each of the parties to the Merger Agreement agreed to release and discharge and hold harmless each of the other parties with respect to the transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

In addition to the termination, under the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to make a $1,000,000 strategic investment in DatChat which consisted of (a) a cash payment of $500,000, (b) the forgiveness of prior advances made to DatChat by the Company, and (c) an obligation of the Company to pay certain specific future compensation expenses of DatChat (amounts in clauses (b) and (c) not to exceed a maximum of $500,000 in the aggregate); in exchange for $1,000,000 of restricted shares of DatChat common stock which is equal to 3.6% of the issued and outstanding common stock of DatChat.