His comments about what I said about ZYZ in my book are ludicrous! The comments I made he has taken out of context completely. I was referring to a spike in ZYZ's price in 2003 when it went from half a pence to one and three quarters pence and then back to half a pence again (or near to). I believed (in my opinion) the price increased briefly because the shares were ramped by a gang and was an example of the ramping of illquid stock. The company itself had to put a stop to it by issuing a statement saying there was no reason for the spike. So what I meant was the shares were never worth more than half a pence AT THAT TIME - IN 2003 -