Stew-james - it's not that I dislike Cackwell - in fact I don't know him but know of his endeavours.
It's also not that I don't want anyone on this board with a differing view to mine.
What I do object to is someone that spout so much bollocks to the FSA or the LSE about "supposed" holders.
The companies that own 29% or thereabouts are verified and bona-fide holders. How can SC say that their stock shouldn't be included?
In my opinion, and knowing SC's shorting ventures the FSA should ignore him completely. He is trying to talk this one down but he has (unfortunately for him) picked the wrong stock.
This babe is only going one way at the moment and that's north.