I do not like executives in a business that I have money in to have to be considered to be possibly 'compromised' in what is best for the business, as opposed to what maybe best for them as individuals...even the fact that I am having to contemplate this possibility (as we have an absence of detail) makes me feel seriously uncomfortable about the way that this deal has been constructed - there may well be core IP development/ownership conflicts that could occur here, and I want to know that my execs are doing what is right for my investment....I believe in incentives, but ones that you are made to work for and are transparent.
If my cynicism is unfounded then so much the better, but lets see the details so that we as shareholders can make that judgement; as we can hardly rely on the non-execs to protect shareholders interests here – can we?!!