CR
You are absolutely right to confine yours, Hambi and others' superb efforts to just one objective - doublers for 2006. By the law of averages, some nominations will turn out to be bumbers and others as mere solid gains. To specifically widen the criteria any further will devalue the singular objective. Those who are not prepared to spend the time in mustering the facts and arguments for your consideration should quite rightly be ignored, if not out of hand.
Advfn already provides a superb facility for posters to start up threads on any and all companies; thus those who want to nominate companies which might make gains of less than 100%, are already provided for.
