|
Stocks to Double in 2006 - we name them
Lauders - Fri, 30 Dec 05 :
Hambi & CR - A thought/idea. I was just 'voting' on CFE and whilst I think more towards the negative side for the vote, and voted as such, they do have a good chance as CR points out. So what if someone wants to vote and they don't particularly have a positive view nor a negative view? Should they not vote at all or perhaps a "neutral" category/option should be introduced. What do you think? In most voting systems there is a "yes", "no" or "don't know/possibly".
PS. Anyone who chose an advertising sector company might see some short-term weakness due to this:
LONDON (SHARECAST) - Martin Sorrell, chief executive of WPP, gave warning yesterday that 2006 could be another testing year for media companies dependent on advertising in the UK.
Speaking to The Times, Sir Martin also gave warning about the outlook for advertising in the United States.
|
|
|
|