|
Stocks to Double in 2006 - we name them
CockneyRebel - Wed, 28 Dec 05 :
Well you get the plonker of the year award on here tenapen.
I won't be slagging anybody off who post reasoned arguments for a doubler, nor will anybody else I hope, just as nobody got slagged off on the 2004 or 2005 threads.
The only people that get berated are those that are too dumb to read the header post and supply stocks without any reasoning or post just one liners - they berate themselves by making themselves 'self confirmed dipsticks' as described in the header.
The whole point of the thread is to identify stocks that might double. If someone posts 9 pigs then there's a very good chance the tenth one will be a pig too. If someone posts a string of winners then the chances are they are a good stock picker and might be worth listening too. It's about weeding out the rubbish and helping us all to identify very cheap stocks faster.
The thread at the top clearly states you have to post your reasoning or you are a 'self confirmed dipstick'. If the fact you did that tenapen, and it's upset you I'm sorry but rules is rules, you slag youreself by posting brief or one liner type ramps.
CR
|
|
|
|