|
Stocks to Double in 2006 - we name them
CockneyRebel - Sun, 18 Dec 05 :
tenapen - what you have posted does not constitute posting your reasoning, it's just a cut and paste of a set of results - not allowed I'm afraid, I'm sorry.
Look, let me explain why people have to post their reasoning:
If we all just posted a one line ramp there would be loads, nobody would bother trudging through them all and all of this would be pointless.
The same goes for big cut and pasting of results, the time it takes to read that lot destroys the point of the thread.
What the thread wants is people to post a brief outline of why someone thinks a stock will double. Just bullet points will do but something that shows everyone the highlights or the points that might make a stock double. this way we can all take a quick look and if the headlines are interesting we can research a bit more. If it's done like this readers can quickly assess the potential and you might actually attract interest in a stock that you hold that does have potential.
The one liners and the huge cut and pastes serve no purpose to inform others and you're basically wasting your time in the main as we can all dig around in results - we are trying to create a short cut to sifting out the carp.
Do 10-15 mins work, post some brief highlights and we might all more swiftly find undervalued stocks - that's what the thread is here for, to help us all get richer! They say no pain, no gain. Well 10-15 mins typing is hardly much pain if you really believe in a stock and if you're right we'll all be buying. The gain will then be worth that very little pain imo.
Best wishes.
CR
|
|
|
|