"... if you want to know about the jv with Cardinal so much WHY DON'T YOU CONTACT STANELCO FOR GODS SAKE!!!"
Rather doubt stanelco would tell a nonshareholder -- or even a shareholder, for that matter -- the truth about what happened. More likely, "no comment." But maybe some have already "contacted" Cardinal and know all kinds of things and just want mr. masterson (-ton?) to admit he hasn't a clue. Could be, huh?
"And finally I do get the feeling there are alot of BPRG holders on here that are somewhat INSECURE over SEO and it's future, if all goes well AND THEY DO STAY IN BUSINESS, (which I personally have no doubt they will) I would like to see the look on your faces as SEO's shareprice sails past BPRG..........."
Lotsa 'ifs' in there, adey ... and it's a leap for you to think any bprg holder posting here is even a little insecure about the future of both companies.
It's not nice to try to steal a patent. You know why? because it makes the stealee very angry. Angry enough to seek significant damages. Considerably more money than seo has available. It's also not nice to try to play a judge with stalling tactics. You know why? Because that's likely to make the judge even angrier than the stealee.
So, given that the damage assessment and award will be very large indeed, who do you think might be that white (or black) knight; what person or company would be foolish enough to want to bail out a company with seo's ethics?
In the meantime, by his probing, indepth "research," by cut'n pasting absolutely irrelevant snippets and links, mr. masterson tries to convince his audience that everything will come up roses for seo because every single company in the whole wide world is beating a path to seo's door, even though they don't know they are.
As for ridiculing mr. masterson -- how could anyone resist such an easy target?
Stora Enso stock quotes
Stora Enso stock charts
Follow this thread
