Mmmmmm...well there's the 16.3M accounted for.
Wonder who has taken the 16.9M reported around the same time or would that trade have been an error/cancelled trade? but it doesn't appear to be.
If not an error, then there should be another rns to account for 6% more of the company.
cimac > true - they're only buying to pass on to their clients so they must have highlighted it in their quarterly mag to which I no longer subscribe but they must have put a decent case forward as reason to buy on their research.
Also, they must have put a decent reason forward to the MMs to be able to get them at 1p and to venture a guess, I reckon they probably said something like "give 'em to us now at a penny 'cos they'll probably be at that level anyway in January when/if the extra 150M shares are placed"
Fund1 > with respect, I disagree, though your good self may have a different opinion.
My past experience on their tips has been hit and miss though in truth, I have never purchased through them and my main reason has been because I monitored their tips for a while and was not overly impressed with subsequent performance in general.
I'm sure many others would be quite happy with them which is great but they didn't quite suite my own investing style. Purely personal choice.