PAN ANDEAN RESOURCES......Discussion thread

pizzaman - 28 Dec'02 - 14:37 - 10037 of 10037
‘’ please note that the words NEW and seismic have been
added to the article in the hope that i can make a tosser happy
coz i be fucked if any of those words appear in the article on
pans web site’’

So Pizzaplonk believes every thing that he reads ???? could
this be why he is now in the sh-t ????????

As we can all see there is still a big gap in Pizzaplonk’s
comprehension of the written word.

Pizzza can not understand that when Pan mentions ‘’infill wells
‘’ that they mean NEW WELLS, maybe PizzaPLONK can tell us how
you can drill OLD infill wells that have not been mentioned before ??????

Something else that Pizza would like to dwell on is the % take
that Pan will take on these as yet unproved successful wells.

Pan and partners keep 100% and let the farmer drill NEW WELLS,
the farmer then uses old seismic that has proved 100% unreliable in
the past. Great so far, the farmer is an IDIOT.

Things that a pizzaplonk should be asking instead of showing
his complete ignorance of the oil industry.

Will the farmer be first carrying out a well enhancement program ????
( well acid zing ????, recompilations or work-overs ?????? refacturing old reservoirs ?????? etc etc etc.

Time frame until first well is drilled if they are not carrying out a
well enhancement program ??????????

Will they use old seismic that has been proved to be unreliable in
the past ???? ( 2 duff wells using it )

What is the % cut to Pan after the farmer takes his cut ??????

How many NEW WELLS and how long will it take to get to 4,000 bopd ????

Is this ‘’ full engineering team that will arrive at site shortly to
complete project evaluation ‘’ actually doing a new seismic survey ????????

------------

How would normal people like to risk their investment, on the basis
of new seismic or the Pizzaplonk way ?????

LOL !

J.B.