Good you now realise that the infill wells are NEW WELLS.
You now know the similarities between the words techniques and
method.
Excellent, we are making headway but it is hard going.
( how many of your teachers took early retirement because of you ?? )
--------------
pizzaman - 28 Dec'02 - 12:40 - 10034 of 10034
''Nice to see that you now know that the this
wells that Pan are talking about are nothing
like the last 2 that proved to be duff. ( WHAT A DUMMY )''
Pizzaplonk, here is another chance to show us that you can shine.
Pizzaplonk you say the last 2 infill wells were duff and these
NEW infill WELLS are nothing like them ????.
Well they are infill wells, so there we have one similarity and you
say they do not need new seismic before they are drilled so there
are now 2 similarities, so how can you say
‘’ the this wells that Pan are talking about are nothing like the last
2 that proved to be duff. ‘’ ?????
So Pizzaplonk, they ‘’ are nothing a like ‘’ but they are the same
so far ?????. ( WHAT A DUMMY )
Perhaps one or two of the more knowledgeable amongst you
( Edgein Curry ) would like to tell our pizzaplonk what they would
prefer.
Would you prefer the NEW infill WELLS drilled using new seismic
gathered by using new techniques and methods or would you
like them drilled using Pizzzaplonks preferred method of using the
old seismic that proved 100% unreliable the last time wells were drilled
at Monte ????????.
How would normal people like to risk their investment, on the basis of
new seismic or the Pizzaplonk way ?????