££......Osmetech ......Smell the Success.....££

You are like buses, LOL!

Bucketfull, How can my opinions be undermining confidence, it is far better to go in with your eyes open than blinded with puff, piss and wind.

I see you have avoided trying to drive the Truck through, LOL! Gartmore selling UBS buying, an X trade, what a surprise!

if you listened to other opinions you might learn something.

As for OMH at the moment, next week will be a good time to question management at the EGM, but if they do run with a trading statement what do you think it will tell us?

It will give us the CC revenues, looking back at previous statements, it won't give us any profit or loss figures, only sales. The large majority of sales will be from CC, I would like to see Molecular figures separately but I am not sure that will happen. They will be very small though, 00k's, for the reasons I gave above.
We may get a forward statement but we have had that with the circular, and they won't be able to add to that until they actually sign deals. The one thing I would like to hear is the CYP450 timetable (that is because this is what will substantially increase sales for OMH over the next couple of years, nothing else comes close to it's potential). So some comment from the Company on CYP450 would be very good!

The recent rise was due to the CC sale, people are now taking a breather, they will also be taking stock of the future and timescales for the Molecular side. There are many unknowns at the moment and until these deals come to fruition and things become clearer, how can people get the real take on what is happening here?

As for undermining anything, exactly what bit is undermining? the comments made in the Company circular? You seem to have got me wrong, mind you getting things wrong is a speciality for you, the other day I had apparently missed out on the rise and was deramping, then I was subtle as a mallet and had bought back in again and now I'm undermining, when all the time I am a shareholder trying to be reasoned and objective, you should try it, you might get something right! then again, LOL.

Trout.