Sorry to spoil the party.
I read the Mail on Sunday article and don`t agree that the transfer of substantial holdings into ones own name is a small matter. Why not mentioned by the Company? Very interested party transactions.
The reasons behind the move to profits. Convincing?
And sorry to go on about it but the silence re Legends Surf position is deafening.
`taking oneself to court`to save tax! Does any one feel comfortable about this?One has the feeling that the company press releases are selective to say the least.
I am an admirer of Shami as an entrepreneurial business operater but find it difficult to buy more shares on the evidence available.