the end conclusion maybe that after paying the RA members an agreed amount (I wouldn't attempt to suggest what may be agreed by the RA committee and David Buchler) that ........
The comany relists with over 30 - 50 million pounds to invest , have massive backing from the LSE and AIM and the government and the investment companies and all the banks (biggest fraud ever on LSE, although other may know different) and set a re-issue price higher than the RA achieves.
This is only one version , there are others, which is why I don't really like the SOA vs RA battle on here. Just be aware that appearing to have the upper hand at the start of a race doesn't always mean you can win it.
6% might be the difference between what some and others get payed out.
You may get the first result it may not be the best one.
I also except it may turn out to be a better option which is why I don't get drawn over this daft battle that goes on here.
We are all linked in a chain wether we like it or not !
The RA was there to protect interests and I can understand why some decided for it after what has happened but is there a need to goad over other shareholders in the same boat making different choices ?
Next we can go into the streets fighting over wether Matthew Mark Luke or John was right (like in Iraq).
Langbar Int stock quotes
Langbar Int stock charts
Follow this thread
