JUST one thread please

Subject: YOUR EMAILS and ADVFN.COM
Date: 20/12/2006 13:58:41 GMT Standard Time
From: JonesCEEJAY
Reply To:
To: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



Dear Mr Kidd

Thank you for your recent emails which provided copies of your bulletin board posts on ADVFN.com made on the 16th December at 14:50 hours. I also acknowledge receipt of three further emails.

Firstly, you allegedly sent an email as asserted on ADVFN on or around the 6th December 2006. I did not receive any email from you until the 16th December. I am not suggesting that you did not send the mail; on occasions, AOL do return mail undelivered. Please forward the entire email to include the header with the original date and time of issue and I will reply to you.

With regard to your email a number of months ago, I did not reply for two reasons. Firstly, I found the manner of your questions and demand for yes or no answers offensive and unacceptable. Secondly and, moreover, I wished to determine the extent of your relationship with Mark Hardy due to serious concerns I had, and continue to have, in view of evidence in my possession and Hardy's unprofessional and wholly unacceptable conduct.

I must put you on notice that the extent of the deceptive posts and on going campaign of abuse on ADVFN bulletin boards directed at me or to me (and on occasions members of my family) by yourself and Mr Hardy may constitute a criminal offence. I will be taking further legal advice in this respect but this has not been a priority in view of other more pressing matters pertaining to my fraud investigation and, of course, the EDI application.

Your most recent emails and posts give me serious cause for concern, not least as they are a serious distraction to my investigations and efforts to obtain justice for shareholders. I feel sure that that is the real reason for the sudden arrival of new posters; however, I will be the first to admit if I am wrong. I will fully support any action against abusive poster and trust that you will do the same in view of your own conduct.

I note your comments and the time constraint you seek to impose. However, they are wholly inappropriate in the circumstances. I cannot be forced into reporting an alleged offence when I do not have full personal knowledge of the circumstances, in addition, contrary to your assertion, I do not know the poster "Gic", to whom you refer in your post. I am aware of an accusation in this respect by a former GOS member as to the alleged identity of the poster; however, the claim was categorically denied by the person in question.

I am suspicious that Mr Hardy should use the recent matter as a very convenient distraction and in a clear attempt to discredit me (consistent with many false posts and misrepresentations) only minutes before the directions hearing in the court waiting room, by stating to solicitors and counsel present, and I quote verbatim:

"His friend" (nodding his head towards me) is making accusations
about me and a shareholder on a bulletin board.."

Hardy then went on to mention the circumstances. I replied that his claims were unsubstantiated and that he could not say for certain who the culprit is or accuse me of being a friend. I advised Hardy that I had emailed someone (who had been accused by another shareholder in an email to me) and the accusations had been denied. Hardy replied "Oh, so you know who it is then" which took my comments entirely out of context, which is wholly consistent with many of Hardy's comments.

Although you have made previous enquiries to me in an offensive and wholly inappropriate manner, as I am sure you will agree, I will be pleased to address any genuine and relevant concerns you may have pertaining to JAG. I am sure that you may not accept what I say, however, I can only state the facts truthfully. I cannot prevent speculation or opinion. For this reason I ceased posting on ADVFN.

When I (and, on occasion, my wife) posted as ATrader on ADVFN, it was to establish further facts on behalf of loyal JAG members pertaining to the rescue of Just Group, due solely to my valid concerns which have subsequently been proven to be fully justified. Posts were only made to determine what connected parties were posting on the site and to establish their motives. My decision has been proven to be well founded, as inconsistent statements were made by a poster who is known to be an ex Just Group plc employee, since named by four former directors and directors of an independent licensee of being seriously involved in major false accounting to falsify Just Group profits and deceive shareholders and, subsequently, JAG members.

JAG members have a valid legal claim for genuine reasons, not the spurious allegation concerning the alleged value of the Andersen legal claim, which was not stated in the share offer documentation; moreover, I made an honest and genuine statement in July 2002 pertaining to the value of the claim being determined by a court of law. I also refer you to the Share Offer documentation which is fundamental to any claim. My comments were clear and my conscience remains perfectly clear, of that I can assure you. If it was not, I would have walked away from this as other GOS members and directors have done in a disgraceful manner.

I will be making further statements shortly in respect of the Andersen claim and my agreed interim payment on account.

I understand why you trust Hardy given various of his claims, comments and information posted. It is for each and every one of us to determine when someone is being genuine and when they are not. It is sometimes difficult to judge and can only be established over a period of time, when inconsistencies and major discrepancies can be properly evaluated. I am very concerned by the sheer volume of inconsistent statements Hardy has made since his appointment, including since the court hearing on Monday.

I must respectfully request that you carefully consider your position in view of misrepresentations and inferences which may compromise the JAG members claim against KPMG and others, including former directors. I am in the process of drafting proceedings which will then be verified by counsel and amended accordingly, after receipt of the reply to my witness statement which is awaited from Messrs Graham and McLoughlin.

I would suggest that anyone involved in posting misleading information and manipulating facts with the intent of diverting attention to JAG and/or myself, when I was not responsible for the information provided to me or on Company records, needs to be viewed with considerable caution.

Sincerely,


Christopher Jones
For & on behalf of members and/or former members of the Just Action Group
______________________________________________________________

Broadway House 21 Broadway Maidenhead Berkshire SL6 1NJ England
www.just-think-action.co.uk