Fair point. I am not here to put a shield up for SG. I do not know the guy and to be honest I do not know exactly what he is or isn't guilty of. You say he should have "done something about it" if he wasn't guilty. Well that update shortly followed a threat from SG claiming slander etc. So he is doing something about it as far as I can see.
Celtic - I can spend some time making this thread look all pretty etc, but to be honest whats the point when I am only going to get banned. You can do better than to slur my lack of professionalism in my thread ;)
Funny you should ask about my media experience. I am starting a consultancy project in the middle east with the UN working closely with a media consultant. All political media though - not cartoons lol
And regarding the CCJ incident, due to your lack of experience in dealing with such cases I can understand your point of view. If I hadn't had the experience of working with people with UNKNOWN CCJ's I'd have been in your boat too. Thank heavens I get about a bit. The point is as simple as this - You cannot declare what you know nothing about.
Organisations bigger than KPMG use their discretion to ignore such points (of declaring you have NO ccj's when unknowingly you DO) and I can give you very basic examples of this.
Just stock quotes
Just stock charts
Follow this thread
