Willydoctor: Let me just quote the coroner. ...On the balance of probabilities, an idiosyncratic reaction to a trial drug (either alone or in combination with other medications) was at least a significant contributory factor to the initiation of this illness.
Having spoken to him on the day of the verdict he said that she was made immobile, which I assume is the referred "initiation of this illness" above. You seem to be looking at the end game, which even to me, appears bleak.
As part of GW's statement they said that for months before her death there was no cannabinoids in her urine. We know that Sativex affects the CB1 and CB2 receptors in the brain. Would it have been possible for the pathologist to have detected this in the autopsy? I still find it difficult to understand why so much blame was laid at GW's doorstep.