FIB and chips.......

active

Oh, I see where you are coming from now. Nobody can post on your board unless they hold shares, and only then if it's positive ra-ra so as not to queer the pitch for you fanatics.

My, Mr Goebbels would be proud. Whatever happened to freedom of expression?

That would be a pretty one sided discussion though, wouldn't it? Why don't you just trot off to your bathroom and talk to yourself?

This company has been a serial destroyer of shareholder value. Fact. It has taken hundreds of millions of shareholders pounds and turned it into assets worth a fraction of that value, akin to forging 10p coins by taking 50p coins and filing the edges off. Not very bright.

I don't particularly have a "downer" on FIB. In fact I love the company. Having seen through the veneer about five years ago I have consistently shorted the shares and made lumps of money on almost every occasion.

For reasons I have consistently stated, I maintain that this company will never make an economic profit in its current guise and, unless it can be rescued from a sticky end by a predatory competitor, corporate gravity will force it to face these facts.

Contrast my position with your own (and most of the other contributors here). You have allowed yourself to believe the propoganda circling round this company and, having bought the shares, deluded yourself to such a degree that you cannot even see a negative side to the story at all.

In addition, you feel you can post any old rubbish to this board (such as Goldman adding when in fact they reduced) and get away with it! When your folly is pointed out, you go on the attack and question my position and alterior motives.

I maintain my right to add some balance to the claptrap that forms about 90% of the posting here. Some of the remaining 10% is bullish and fair, and I read it with interest because it adds to my knowledge and makes my judgement even better.

I'll continue to add the balance where I can, and I'm afraid, mate, that you are just going to have to live with it.

Argument over? I think so.


bt