Giltspur : Thank you for the more reasonable reply than usual. From what you say you put far more effort into your research than you bother to do when reading what is said in posts. Most of your replies make you seem childish and miss the point, and that is being charitable. Others make the same points you do withot giving that impression. Abuse is usually the resort of those who have run out of reasoned arguement. It is odd that you use it when the are so many arguements here for you to use. If I was SC I would want your support in the terms you give it like a hole in the head. If you are not careful you could damage some of his arguements
There is a large difference between a natural interest in events and a desire to simply abuse those who still have an interest in the share. I share your interests in the books etc. I am also interested in the apparent web of companies here. One thing which puzzles me is why such a web would be created. If it is to keep the ip in the hands of a few insiders, as has been suggested, why bother if the sp has no value. Is it smoke and mirrors, and if so , to what end. Is it to make people think there is something worth having. Is it just lawyers making simple things complicated for the hell of it. Is it legitimate separation of interests? While we wait to see if SC proceeds and if so what comes out, do you have any ideas?