By Annie Gasparro
Sysco Corp. abandoned its planned acquisition of rival US Foods
Inc. following a federal judge's ruling against the deal, forcing
the food-distribution giant to find a new strategy for its future
that is likely to include smaller acquisitions.
Sysco, the nation's largest purveyor of food and other supplies
to restaurants and cafeterias, had been working on the merger for
more than a year and a half when U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in
Washington last week issued a preliminary injunction to stop the
deal on concerns it could hurt competition. The Federal Trade
Commission had filed a lawsuit in February challenging the
transaction on antitrust grounds.
Bill DeLaney, Sysco's chief executive, said that after reviewing
its options, including whether to appeal the judge's decision, the
company determined it was best to move on.
"We've turned the page," Mr. DeLaney said in an interview on
Monday. He said Sysco is now focused on the possibility of smaller
acquisitions, its plan to eliminate $750 million in annual costs,
and efforts to update its product offerings and technology to
compete with rivals that have more natural-and-organic items and
online ordering. "Merging with US Foods was not our entire
strategy," he said.
As a first step, Sysco said on Monday that its board authorized
new purchases of $3 billion of its own stock over the next two
years, equal to about 13% of its total shares outstanding at recent
prices. It will fund the planned stock buybacks through a
combination of new borrowing and cash flow from operations.
Still, Monday's announcement eliminates what had been Sysco's
core strategic plan for its future since the deal to acquire US
Foods for $3.5 billion was disclosed in December 2013. Sysco had
said combining with its largest rival was vital because it would
help the companies reduce costs and pass along those savings to
customers, while other competitors would step up to vie for the No.
2 slot.
A deal would have added about $20 billion in annual revenue from
US Foods to Sysco's $46.5 billion in annual sales, creating a
combined company with about 25% of the national market--although
the government said the figure was much higher in some regions.
The deal's collapse has immediate as well as long-term costs.
Sysco must pay US Foods a $300 million breakup fee, on top of at
least $355 million Sysco already spent on integration planning,
attorneys and other merger-related costs as of the end of March.
Sysco said it also will pay a $12.5 million breakup fee to
Performance Food Group to terminate an agreement to sell it some of
US Foods' assets if that deal had closed.
US Foods Chief Executive John Lederer said the past 18 months
haven't detracted from its day-to-day business, and that it has
invested millions of dollars into new technology and improvements
to its trucks and warehouses. "It's because of this unwavering
dedication that I can confidently say that we are ready to take
this company to the next level, " he said in a statement.
On Monday, shares of Sysco fell 2.2% to $37.54 in 4 p.m. trading
on the New York Stock Exchange. But the news of the breakup wasn't
entirely a surprise. Mr. DeLaney hinted earlier this month that
Sysco would likely come up with a new three-year plan for the
business if the court ruling didn't go its way.
"While there is a tremendous strategic fit here with US Foods,
this was not a bet-the-company type of deal for us," Mr. DeLaney
said in the June 9 presentation. "The savings will not be as great
as what the synergies would have been," but, he added, "there's
actually some things that we can probably do a little faster
without the deal."
Ahead of Monday's announcement, Andrew Wolf, an analyst at
BB&T Capital Markets, said smaller acquisitions could help
Sysco get into the business of selling ingredients to grocery
stores for their prepared foods and delis, which make up about 10%
of food-distribution sales. "After decades of eschewing grocery
stores for their relative [small size] versus restaurants, Sysco
appears to be more focused on trying to serve this growing part of
the market," Mr. Wolf said.
Still, not everyone is confident Sysco can bounce back from
this. "Sysco has embraced cost-reduction efforts before without
much bottom-line benefit," said Guggenheim analyst John
Heinbockel.
In Judge Mehta's lengthy decision, released on Friday, he said
the Sysco-US Foods tie-up was the type of large combination that
lawmakers were concerned about long ago when they gave the
government the power to halt mergers.
"The proposed merger of the [U.S.'s] first and second largest
broadline food service distributors is likely to cause the type of
industry concentration that Congress sought to curb at the outset
before it harmed competition," the judge wrote.
The FTC said on Monday that the decision to abandon the merger
"is a victory for both competition and consumers."
Write to Annie Gasparro at annie.gasparro@wsj.com
Access Investor Kit for Sysco Corp.
Visit
http://www.companyspotlight.com/partner?cp_code=P479&isin=US8718291078
Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires