By Joe Flint And Thomas Gryta 

The simmering struggle over the familiar bundle of cable-television channels broke into open warfare Tuesday as owners of some of the most popular channels accused Verizon Communications Inc. of violating contracts in its bid to offer slimmer, cheaper packages of pay TV.

On Tuesday, NBCUniversal and Fox joined ESPN in saying Verizon's offering violates the agreements under which they supply the company with NFL football, Major League Baseball games and hit shows like Bravo's "Real Housewives" franchise.

The dispute creates a cloud of uncertainty over Verizon's new packages, which launched Sunday and start at $55 a month. The plans let subscribers sign up for a smaller package of channels from broadcasters like ABC and Fox and then add packs of specialized programming like sports or children's TV.

Verizon Chief Financial Officer Fran Shammo said in an interview that the company believes it can offer the programs under its existing contracts and isn't going to back down.

"We have launched the product, we are not retracting it, and we believe we are in our legal rights to launch it," he said.

Verizon is the country's largest wireless carrier. But it also serves 5.7 million pay-TV subscribers, ranking it sixth among the top providers in that industry.

The disputes put it at odds with major programmers at a time when the pay-TV industry and content companies are experimenting with a variety of new approaches as viewers migrate to the Internet. Those moves are being prompted in part by the growth of online alternatives like Netflix Inc. and Hulu as well as moves by channels like HBO to launch their own streaming services.

In a sign of their rising clout, Verizon drops to eighth-largest pay-TV provider from sixth if Netflix and Hulu are included, according to the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, an industry group.

Americans have long sought the ability to ditch hundreds of unwatched channels and pick and choose among those they want. But the industry has moved slowly for fear of upsetting long-lucrative arrangements, and the companies that own the networks have tried to protect their value with detailed contracts specifying how they can be sold.

Some programmers counter that a typical family will have many different programming preferences which is why the bundle works, and that by the time one gets all the channels they want from Verizon, the price difference would be negligible from current rates.

Walt Disney Co.'s ESPN objected last week to Verizon's new offering, saying it would separate the sports channel from Verizon's core lineup. While Verizon and other pay-TV distributors have the ability to create low-price offerings without ESPN, whether it can then package ESPN in an offering with other sports channels to be sold separately is a point of contention.

In a statement, ESPN said, "Verizon's new contemplated bundles describe packages that would not be authorized by our existing agreements. Among other issues, our contracts clearly provide that neither ESPN nor ESPN2 may be distributed in a separate sports package."

Comcast Corp. unit NBCUniversal, which owns many regional sports networks as well as the entertainment channels Bravo and USA, said Tuesday that the Verizon offering falls outside the terms of its contract with Verizon.

Also objecting was 21st Century Fox, a large sports programmer and the parent of entertainment channels FX and FXX. "We reject Verizon's view that it can pursue the new packaging scheme it announced yet still comply with our agreements," a spokesman said. Until mid-2013, 21st Century Fox was part of the same company as News Corp, owner of The Wall Street Journal.

"This is a change" to the old model, Mr. Shammo said, "and people don't like change."

The details of the dispute are lost on many consumers. Dave Schmarder, a 65-year-old retired electronics salesman in Beaver Dams, N.Y., has programmed his cable box to skip over all the channels he doesn't watch. The Time Warner Cable Inc. subscriber said he only watches a few channels, including news and public television. His area doesn't get Verizon's FiOS service, but he said he would be interested in subscribing to a service that offers smaller packages of channels.

"I've been paying for ESPN for 30 years and never watch it," he said. "It all adds up. They are forcing everyone to pay for this."

Verizon is playing to those sentiments in its marketing. The effort includes a website that says, "Pay for what you want and not for what you don't" and an ad that uses animation to mock the traditional bundle. The commercial ends with the slogan, "Cable just gives you channels, FiOS gives you choice."

FiOS's cheapest plan includes a package of basic programming and two "channel packs" of specialized programming. Each additional package, which can consist of about 10 to 17 channels, will cost $10 a month. Customers will be able to switch to a different channel pack after having one for 30 days.

"It is a product consumers want, and it is all about consumer choice," Verizon said Tuesday.

The company has pointed to Nielsen data showing the average number of channels Americans receive has increased 46%, to 189, over the five years ending in 2013, while Americans still watch only about 17.

Satellite broadcaster Dish Network Corp. has introduced a streaming service called Sling TV that lets consumers mix and match tiers of channels on top of a $20-a-month core package. Apple Inc. is planning a TV service offering a "skinny" bundle of channels in the fall, people familiar with the situation have said.

Meanwhile, operators have been slimming down their offerings to cater to cost-conscious customers. Comcast, for instance, offers a skinny bundle of TV channels with HBO and fast broadband.

Separately, Verizon is working on an "over the top" service that will be delivered primarily to mobile devices.

Write to Joe Flint at joe.flint@wsj.com and Thomas Gryta at thomas.gryta@wsj.com

Access Investor Kit for Comcast Corp.

Visit http://www.companyspotlight.com/partner?cp_code=P479&isin=US20030N1019

Access Investor Kit for Comcast Corp.

Visit http://www.companyspotlight.com/partner?cp_code=P479&isin=US20030N2009

Access Investor Kit for The Walt Disney Co.

Visit http://www.companyspotlight.com/partner?cp_code=P479&isin=US2546871060

Access Investor Kit for Netflix, Inc.

Visit http://www.companyspotlight.com/partner?cp_code=P479&isin=US64110L1061

Access Investor Kit for Time Warner, Inc.

Visit http://www.companyspotlight.com/partner?cp_code=P479&isin=US8873173038

Access Investor Kit for 21st Century Fox, Inc.

Visit http://www.companyspotlight.com/partner?cp_code=P479&isin=US90130A1016

Access Investor Kit for 21st Century Fox, Inc.

Visit http://www.companyspotlight.com/partner?cp_code=P479&isin=US90130A2006

Access Investor Kit for Verizon Communications, Inc.

Visit http://www.companyspotlight.com/partner?cp_code=P479&isin=US92343V1044

Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires

Walt Disney (NYSE:DIS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Walt Disney Charts.
Walt Disney (NYSE:DIS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Walt Disney Charts.