Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange
Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant
[X]
|
Filed by a Party other than
the Registrant [ ]
|
|
Check the appropriate
box:
|
|
[ ]
|
|
Preliminary Proxy
Statement
|
[ ]
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the
Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
[X]
|
|
Definitive Proxy
Statement
|
[ ]
|
|
Definitive Additional
Materials
|
[ ]
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
(Name of Registrant as
Specified In Its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Name
of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
|
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check
the appropriate box):
|
[X]
|
|
No fee required.
|
[
]
|
|
Fee computed on
table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Title of each class of
securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to
which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying
value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set
forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5)
|
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
[
]
|
|
Fee paid previously
with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
|
[
]
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for
which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or
Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Amount Previously
Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration
Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4)
|
|
Date Filed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
Notice of 2016
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
and Proxy
Statement
Wednesday, August 10, 2016
10:30
a.m., Eastern Time
Via live webcast
at
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CSC
Table of Contents
Computer Sciences
Corporation
Dear Fellow CSC Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to join CSCs
Board of Directors and senior leadership at our 2016 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on August 10, 2016. We are pleased that this years
annual meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders, which will
be conducted via live webcast. You will be able to attend the annual meeting by
visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CSC.
We are excited to utilize the latest
technology as a means to improve our communication with stockholders. The
accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement
provide important information about the meeting and will serve as your guide to
the business to be conducted at the meeting.
During the year, I was honored to be
appointed Chairman of the Board, succeeding Rodney Chase, who served CSC and our
stockholders with great commitment and distinction for more than a decade. The
independent directors of the Board elected Bruce Churchill, a seasoned leader
and independent director, to serve in the newly established Lead Independent
Director role. This role reflects CSCs commitment to transparency and will help
facilitate our Boards independent, objective, effective and efficient oversight
of our Company. The duties of the Lead Independent Director are codified in our
Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board also welcomed as directors Dr. Mukesh
Aghi, Herman E. Bulls, Peter Rutland and Robert F. Woods, and has nominated
Lizabeth H. Zlatkus for our stockholders consideration at the annual
meeting.
As stewards of your Company, the Board
is focused on achieving long-term performance and creating value for our
stockholders through prudent execution of business strategies, risk management,
strong corporate governance, and top-quality talent and succession
planning.
In Fiscal 2016, CSC separated into two
market-leading, publicly traded pure-play companies: CSC and CSRA. CSC continues
to serve commercial and government clients globally. CSRA, which was born
through the combination of CSCs former North American Public Sector (NPS)
business with SRA International, serves public sector clients in the United
States.
The separation reflects our commitment
to create value for our stockholders and to capitalize on the historic changes
in the marketplace. Both CSC and CSRA have strong foundations, are
well-positioned to grow and lead in their segments, and create compelling value
propositions for investors, clients, partners and employees.
The separation of CSC and the
subsequent merger of NPS with SRA was a notable accomplishment in Fiscal 2016:
It was achieved in six months time, rather than the typical year; it was
accomplished with a minimum of disruption to the existing business; and it was
so successful that it was recognized as the best single deal of the year by
Washington Technology magazine.
Much was accomplished beyond the
separation. CSC strengthened its global commercial positioning with the
strategic acquisitions of Fixnetix, Fruition Partners, UXC Limited and
Xchanging. CSC also completed its post-separation move to new corporate and
Americas region headquarters in Tysons, Virginia.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
We are carrying this momentum forward
in the new fiscal year with the proposed merger of CSC with the Enterprise
Services business of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. The prospect of this
combination is an exciting development for our industry and for our people,
clients, partners and shareholders. This transaction is forecast to close at the
end of March 2017.
Even with these significant changes,
CSC showed continued progress on its transformational journey to become a global
leader in next generation information technology services and solutions. Once
again, CSC returned significant capital to stockholders, including concurrent
special cash dividends paid by CSC and CSRA, which in the aggregate totaled
$10.50 per share.
The Companys compensation program
provides an appropriate mix of elements to incentivize our executives to
continue the next phase of the Companys transformation and to foster a
performance-based culture. Our 2016 compensation program was designed to reward
achievement of annual, long-term and strategic goals, such as growing revenues,
operating income and cash flow, and improving client satisfaction. More
information about our compensation program is contained in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.
On behalf of the full Board, I would
like to thank CSC employees for their hard work, resilience and dedication to
the Companys transformation - especially in light of a company separation and
multiple acquisitions.
And to CSC stockholders, thank you for
your continued trust and confidence in the Companys strategic growth
initiatives and transformation agenda. We value your support and are committed
to communicating transparently with our stockholders. In Fiscal 2017, I will
continue my long-standing practice of meeting with investors representing a
substantial portion of our investor base to understand their
perspectives.
We encourage you to share your
opinions, interests and concerns, and invite you to write to us with your
reactions and suggestions to the Corporate Secretary, CSC, 1775 Tysons Blvd.,
Tysons, VA 22102.
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
J. Michael Lawrie
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President &
CEO
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Computer
Sciences Corporation
1775 Tysons Boulevard, Tysons,
Virginia 22102
Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders
Wednesday,
August 10, 2016
10:30 a.m.,
Eastern Time
Online at
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CSC
The 2016 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders will be held on Wednesday, August 10, 2016, at 10:30 a.m. Eastern
Time, and will be a virtual meeting conducted via live webcast. You will be able
to attend the meeting online and submit your questions during the meeting by
visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CSC. To participate in the annual
meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your notice of
Internet availability of the proxy materials, on your proxy card or on the
instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. The purpose of the meeting
is to vote on:
1.
|
the election of the ten director nominees named in the
attached proxy statement as directors of CSC;
|
|
2.
|
the approval, by advisory vote, of the Companys
executive compensation;
|
|
3.
|
the ratification of the appointment of independent
auditors for fiscal year 2017;
|
|
4.
|
the approval of an amendment to the 2011 Omnibus
Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance
under the plan by an additional 7,250,000 shares;
|
|
5.
|
the approval of an amendment to the 2010 Non-Employee
Director Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for
issuance under the plan by an additional 500,000 shares; and
|
|
6.
|
such other business as may properly come before the
meeting.
|
Only stockholders of record at the
close of business on June 13, 2016 will be entitled to vote electronically at
the meeting and any postponements or adjournments thereof.
Your vote is important. Whether or not
you plan to attend the meeting online, we encourage you to read this proxy
statement and vote as soon as possible. Information on how to vote is contained
in this proxy statement. In addition, voting instructions are provided in the
Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, or, if you requested printed
materials, the instructions are printed on your proxy card and included in the
accompanying proxy statement. You can revoke a proxy at any time prior to its
exercise at the Annual Meeting by following the instructions in the proxy
statement.
|
By Order of the Board of
Directors,
|
|
|
|
William L. Deckelman,
Jr.
Executive Vice President, General
Counsel & Secretary
Tysons, Virginia
June 24,
2016
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Proxy Summary
This summary highlights information
contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all
of the information you should consider, and you should read the entire Proxy
Statement carefully before voting.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
|
|
Meeting Agenda
|
|
|
|
Meeting Date:
|
|
August 10, 2016
|
|
●
Election of ten directors
●
Advisory vote to approve executive compensation
●
Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our
independent auditor
for fiscal year 2017
●
Approval of amendment to the 2011 Omnibus
Incentive
Plan
●
Approval of amendment to the 2010 Non-Employee
Director Incentive
Plan
●
Such other business that may properly come before
the
meeting
|
|
|
|
|
Meeting Time:
|
|
10:30 a.m. Eastern Time
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meeting Place:
|
|
Online at www.
virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CSC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virtual
Meeting
Admission:
|
|
Stockholders as of the record
date will be able to participate in the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CSC. To participate in the meeting, you
will need the 16-digit control number included on your notice of Internet
availability of the proxy materials, on your proxy card or on the
instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.
The annual meeting will begin
promptly at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Time. Online check-in will begin at 10:15
a.m. Eastern Time, and you should allow ample time for the online check-in
procedures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Record Date:
|
|
June 13, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting:
|
|
Stockholders as of the record
date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one
vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals to
be voted on.
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Voting matters and vote
recommendation
Matter
|
|
Vote Recommendation
|
Management
Proposals
|
|
|
1.
|
|
Election of
directors
|
|
FOR each
nominee
|
2.
|
|
Advisory vote to approve
executive compensation
|
|
FOR
|
3.
|
|
Ratification of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as our independent auditor for fiscal year 2017
|
|
FOR
|
4.
|
|
Approval of the amendment to
the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan
|
|
FOR
|
5.
|
|
Approval of amendment to the
2010 Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan
|
|
FOR
|
Our Director Nominees
The following table provides summary
information about each director nominee. Each director is elected annually by a
majority of votes cast.
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Other
Public
|
|
Committee
Memberships
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Since
|
|
Independent
|
|
Boards
|
|
AC
|
|
CC
|
|
NCG
|
Mukesh Aghi
|
|
60
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
M
|
Herman E. Bulls
|
|
60
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
M
|
Bruce B. Churchill
|
|
58
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
|
Mark Foster
|
|
56
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
Sachin Lawande
|
|
49
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
J. Michael
Lawrie
|
|
63
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
EO
|
|
EO
|
|
EO
|
Brian P. MacDonald
|
|
50
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Rutland
|
|
37
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
|
Robert F. Woods
|
|
61
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
|
Lizabeth H.
Zlatkus
|
|
57
|
|
Nominee
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AC
|
Audit Committee
|
C
|
Chair
|
CC
|
Compensation Committee
|
M
|
Member
|
NCG
|
Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee
|
EO
|
Ex-Officio
Member
|
Attendance
Each director nominee who is a current
director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board
held during the fiscal year ended April 1, 2016 (Fiscal Year 2016 or Fiscal
2016).
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
STOCKHOLDER RETURN AND FISCAL 2016
COMPENSATION
|
CSCs Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
was 23.78% in Fiscal 2016. Our three-year TSR is 68.72%. Compensation to our
executive officers reflects this performance, as well as other achievements in
the Companys ongoing transformation.
The table below shows our cumulative
TSR from the start of Fiscal 2014 to the last day of each of the fiscal years
shown below:
Our cumulative TSR has been calculated
based on a $100 investment in our common stock made at the closing price on
March 28, 2013 (the last day of Fiscal 2013) as of the end of each fiscal year
in the three-year period shown above, and includes the reinvestment of dividends
paid in each year, including the special $10.50 dividend paid in connection with
the Separation. For purposes of the calculation, the CSRA shares received in
connection with the Separation were deemed to have been sold at their value at
the time of Separation and the proceeds reinvested in our common
stock.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
We are asking stockholders to approve,
on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive
officers. In evaluating this Say-on-Pay proposal, we recommend you review our
Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which discusses the compensation policies
and practices underlying our executive compensation program and how pay is
aligned with our performance, along with the tables that follow.
The Companys executive compensation
programs for Fiscal 2016 were designed to support the continuation of the
Companys transformation. The success of these actions can be seen in the
Companys 68.72% three-year TSR (Fiscal 2014-Fiscal 2016). Our three-year TSR of
68.72% led both the S&P 500 (39.8%) and the S&P North American
Technology Index (58.7%) for the same period. We believe our compensation design
contributes directly to the Companys success by motivating and rewarding an
exceptional management team and continuing to successfully accomplish the
following:
●
|
Encourage a performance-based
culture driven by our CLEAR (Client-focused, Leadership, Execution
excellence, Aspiration and Results) values;
|
●
|
Base short- and long-term
incentive compensation on company-wide achievement and individual
performance goals; and
|
●
|
Align the interests of the
executives with those of our
stockholders.
|
Ratification of Independent
Auditors
|
At the 2016 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, stockholders will be asked to consider and to vote upon the
ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as CSCs
independent auditors for Fiscal 2017. In order to assure continuing auditor
independence, the Audit Committee periodically considers whether there should be
a regular rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm. The
members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued
retention of Deloitte & Touche to serve as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and
its stockholders.
Amendment to 2011 Omnibus
Incentive Plan
|
At the 2016 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, stockholders will be asked to consider and to approve the
amendment to the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares
authorized for issuance under the plan by an additional 7,250,000 shares. This
amendment was approved by the Board and requires stockholder ratification to
take effect. The Board believes that this amendment is in the best interests of
the Company and its stockholders, as it will allow the Company to grant shares
of common stock to employees in the form of options and RSUs for the next fiscal
year.
Amendment to 2010 Non-Employee
Director Incentive Plan
|
At the 2016 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, stockholders will be asked to consider and to approve the
amendment to the 2010 Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan to increase the
number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan by an additional 500,000
shares. This amendment was approved by the Board and requires stockholder
ratification to take effect. The Board believes that this amendment is in the
best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
i
|
Table of Contents
ii
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Computer
Sciences Corporation
1775 Tysons
Boulevard
Tysons, Virginia 22102
June 24, 2016
PROXY STATEMENT
We are providing these proxy materials
in connection with the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual
Meeting) of Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC or the Company and sometimes
referred to with the pronouns we, us and our). The Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials (the Notice), this proxy statement, any
accompanying proxy card or voting instruction card and our 2016 Annual Report to
Stockholders (our 2016 Annual Report), which includes our 2016 Annual Report
on Form 10-K, were first made available to stockholders on or about June 24,
2016. This proxy statement contains important information for you to consider
when deciding how to vote on the matters brought before the Annual Meeting.
Please read it carefully.
We are delivering proxy materials for
the Annual Meeting under the United States Securities and Exchange Commissions
Notice and Access rules. These rules permit us to furnish proxy materials,
including this proxy statement and our 2016 Annual Report, to our stockholders
by providing access to such documents on the Internet instead of mailing printed
copies. Most stockholders received the Notice, which provides instructions on
how you may access and review all of the proxy materials on the Internet. The
Notice also instructs you as to how you may submit your proxy on the Internet.
More information about Notice and Access is set forth in Questions and Answers
about the Annual Meeting and Voting.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
1
|
Table of Contents
QUESTIONS AND
ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
|
|
1.
|
Who is soliciting my vote?
|
The Board of Directors of CSC
(sometimes referred to herein as the Board) is soliciting your vote at the
Annual Meeting.
|
|
2.
|
When will the meeting
take place?
|
The Annual Meeting will be a completely
virtual meeting of stockholders, which will be conducted via live webcast on
Wednesday, August 10, 2016. You are entitled to participate in the Annual
Meeting only if you were a stockholder as of the Record Date (as defined below)
or if you hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting.
You will be able to attend the Annual
Meeting online and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CSC. You will also be able to vote your shares
electronically at the Annual Meeting (other than shares held through the MAP, as
defined below, which must be voted prior to the Annual Meeting).
To participate in the Annual Meeting,
you will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet
Availability of the proxy materials, on your proxy card or on the instructions
that accompanied your proxy materials.
The meeting webcast will begin promptly
at 10:30 a.m., Eastern Time. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the
start time. Online check-in will begin at 10:15 a.m., Eastern Time, and you
should allow ample time for the check-in procedures.
|
|
3.
|
Why a virtual meeting?
|
We are pleased to offer our
stockholders a completely virtual Annual Meeting, which provides worldwide
access, improved communication and cost savings for our stockholders and the
Company.
You will be able to attend the annual
meeting of stockholders online and submit your questions during the meeting by
visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CSC. You also will be able to vote
your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting (other than shares held through
the MAP, as defined below, which must be voted prior to the meeting).
|
|
4.
|
What if during the check-in time or during the meeting I have
technical difficulties or trouble accessing the virtual meeting
website?
|
We will have technicians ready to
assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing the virtual
meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during
the check-in or meeting time, please call:
1-855-449-0991 (U.S. Domestic Toll
Free)
1-720-378-5962 (International)
2
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
|
|
5.
|
What is the purpose of the
Annual Meeting?
|
You will be voting on:
●
|
the election of each of the ten
director nominees as directors of CSC;
|
●
|
the approval, by advisory vote,
of the Companys executive compensation;
|
●
|
the ratification of the selection
of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our auditors for the fiscal year ending
March 31, 2017 (Fiscal 2017);
|
●
|
the approval of an amendment to
the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares
authorized for issuance under the plan by an additional 7,250,000
shares;
|
●
|
the approval of an amendment to
the 2010 Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan to increase the number of
shares authorized for issuance under the plan by an additional 500,000
shares; and
|
●
|
any other business that may
properly come before the meeting.
|
|
|
6.
|
What
are the Board of Directors
recommendations?
|
The Board recommends a vote:
1.
|
for
the election of each of the ten nominees for
director;
|
2.
|
for
the approval, on an advisory basis, of the Companys
executive compensation;
|
3.
|
for
the ratification of the selection of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as our auditors for Fiscal 2017;
|
4.
|
for
the approval of an amendment to the 2011 Omnibus
Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance
under the plan by an additional 7,250,000 shares;
and
|
5.
|
for
the approval of an amendment to the 2010 Non-Employee
Director Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for
issuance under the plan by an additional 500,000
shares.
|
|
|
7.
|
Who is
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?
|
The Board of Directors set June 13,
2016 as the record date for the Annual Meeting (the Record Date). All
stockholders who owned CSC common stock at the close of business on June 13,
2016 may attend and vote electronically at the Annual Meeting and any
postponements or adjournments thereof.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
3
|
Table of Contents
|
|
8.
|
Why did I receive a notice in
the mail regarding the Internet
availability of proxy
materials this year instead of a paper copy of proxy
materials?
|
Under the Notice and Access rules of
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), we are
permitted to furnish proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our
2016 Annual Report, to our stockholders by providing access to such documents on
the Internet instead of mailing printed copies. Most stockholders will not
receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead,
the Notice, which was mailed to most of our stockholders, will instruct you as
to how you may access and review all of the proxy materials on the Internet. The
Notice also instructs you as to how you may vote your shares on the Internet. If
you would like to receive a paper or electronic copy of our proxy materials,
follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice. Any request
to receive proxy materials by mail or electronically will remain in effect until
you revoke it.
|
|
9.
|
Can I vote my shares by
filling out and returning the Notice?
|
No. The Notice identifies the items to
be voted on at the Annual Meeting, but you cannot vote by marking the Notice and
returning it. The Notice provides instructions on how to vote by (i) Internet,
(ii) telephone, (iii) requesting and returning a paper proxy card or voting
instruction card, or (iv) submitting a ballot in person at the
meeting.
|
|
10.
|
Why didnt I receive a Notice
in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy
materials?
|
If you previously elected to access
proxy materials over the Internet, you will not receive a Notice in the mail.
You should have received an email with links to the proxy materials and online
proxy voting. Additionally, if you previously requested paper copies of the
proxy materials or if applicable regulations require delivery of the proxy
materials, you will not receive the Notice.
If you received a paper copy of the
proxy materials or the Notice by mail, you can eliminate all such paper mailings
in the future by electing to receive an email that will provide Internet links
to these documents. Opting to receive all future proxy materials online will
save us the cost of producing and mailing documents to your home or business and
help us conserve natural resources. See http://www.icsdelivery.com/csc to
request complete electronic delivery. Enrollment for electronic delivery is
effective until cancelled.
|
|
11.
|
How many votes do I
have?
|
You will have one vote for each share
of our common stock you owned at the close of business on the Record Date,
provided those shares are either held directly in your name as the stockholder
of record or were held for you as the beneficial owner through a broker, bank or
other nominee.
|
|
12.
|
What is the difference between
holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial
owner?
|
Most of our stockholders hold their
shares through a broker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own
name. As summarized below, there are some differences between shares held of
record and those owned beneficially.
4
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Stockholder of
Record
.
If your shares are registered
directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare, you are considered
the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice or these
proxy materials are being sent directly to you. As the stockholder of record,
you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us, to submit proxies
electronically or by telephone or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If
you have requested printed proxy materials, we have enclosed a proxy card for
you to use.
Beneficial
Owner
.
If your shares are held in a
stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the
beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and the Notice or these proxy
materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or nominee who is
considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As the
beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or nominee on
how to vote your shares and you are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting
via live webcast. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may
not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting, unless you request,
complete and deliver a legal proxy from your broker, bank or nominee. If you
requested printed proxy materials, your broker, bank or nominee has enclosed a
voting instruction card for you to use in directing the broker, bank or nominee
regarding how to vote your shares.
|
|
13.
|
How many votes must be present
to hold the Annual Meeting?
|
A majority of our issued and
outstanding shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting as of the Record Date
must be present at the Annual Meeting in order to hold the Annual Meeting and
conduct business. This is called a quorum. Shares are counted as present at
the Annual Meeting if you are present and vote in person at the Annual Meeting
or by telephone or on the Internet or a proxy card has been properly submitted
by you or on your behalf. Both abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as
present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.
As of the Record Date there were
139,259,508 shares of CSC common stock outstanding.
|
|
14.
|
How many votes are required to
elect directors and adopt the other
proposals?
|
Proposal 1
Election of Directors
.
Directors are
elected by a majority vote in uncontested elections. Therefore, each director
nominee must receive a majority of the votes cast with respect to such nominee
at the Annual Meeting (
i.e.
, the number of FOR votes must exceed the number of
AGAINST votes). Abstentions and, if applicable, broker non-votes are not
counted as votes FOR or AGAINST any nominee; therefore, they will have no
effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal. In accordance with the
Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines, if an incumbent director nominee
fails to receive the requisite number of votes, such director nominee shall
promptly tender his or her resignation for consideration by the
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. Within 30 days following the
certification of the stockholder vote, the Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee will make a recommendation to the Board of Directors as to the
treatment of any director who did not receive a majority vote, including whether
to accept or reject any tendered resignation. The Board of Directors will make a
final determination within 90 days following the certification of the election
results, and publicly disclose its decision and rationale.
Proposal 2
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
.
This proposal, which is non-binding, requires an affirmative FOR vote
of a majority of the votes cast (
i.e.
, of the votes FOR or AGAINST)
to be approved. Abstentions and, if applicable, broker non-votes are not counted
as votes FOR or AGAINST this proposal; therefore, they will have no effect
on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.
Proposal 3
Ratification of Independent Auditors
.
This proposal requires
an affirmative FOR vote of a majority of the votes cast (
i.e.
, of the votes FOR or
AGAINST) to be approved. Abstentions are not counted as votes FOR or
AGAINST this proposal; therefore, they will have no effect on the outcome of
the vote on this proposal.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
5
|
Table of Contents
Proposal 4
Approval of Amendment to 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan
.
This proposal requires an affirmative FOR vote of a majority
of the votes cast (
i.e.
, of the votes FOR or AGAINST) to be approved. Abstentions
and, if applicable, broker non-votes are not counted as votes FOR or AGAINST
this proposal; therefore, they will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on
this proposal.
Proposal 5
Approval of Amendment to 2010 Non-Employee Director Incentive
Plan
.
This proposal requires an
affirmative FOR vote of a majority of the votes cast (
i.e.
, of the votes FOR or
AGAINST) to be approved. Abstentions and, if applicable, broker non-votes are
not counted as votes FOR or AGAINST this proposal; therefore, they will have
no effect on the outcome of the vote on this proposal.
|
|
15.
|
What if I dont give specific
voting instructions?
|
Stockholders of
Record
.
If you are a stockholder of
record and you:
●
|
Indicate when voting by Internet
or by telephone that you wish to vote as recommended by our Board of
Directors; or
|
●
|
Return a signed proxy card but do
not indicate how you wish to vote,
|
then your shares will be voted in
accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors on all matters
presented in this proxy statement and as the proxy holders may determine in
their discretion regarding any other matters properly presented for a vote at
the meeting. If you indicate a choice with respect to any matter to be acted
upon on your proxy card or voting instruction card, the shares will be voted in
accordance with your instructions.
Beneficial
Owners
.
If you hold shares beneficially in street name and do not provide your
broker with voting instructions, your shares may constitute broker non-votes
on certain proposals. Generally, broker non-votes occur on a non-routine
proposal where a broker is not permitted to vote on that proposal without
instructions from the beneficial owner, and instructions are not given. Broker
non-votes are considered present at the Annual Meeting, but not as voting on any
particular matter. Thus, broker non-votes are counted as present for purposes of
determining the existence of a quorum, but are not counted for purposes of
determining whether a non-routine proposal has been approved. In other words
broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the election of directors, the
approval of the Companys executive compensation, the approval of the amendment
to the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the approval of the amendment to the 2010
Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan, each of which are non-routine
proposals.
If you provide instructions, your
broker will vote your street name shares at the Annual Meeting with respect to
(i) the election of directors, (ii) approval of the Companys executive
compensation, (iii) approval of the amendment to the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan
and (iv) approval of the amendment to the 2010 Non-Employee Director Incentive
Plan. Therefore, if you wish to vote your street name shares at the annual
meeting, you should instruct your broker how to vote. If you do not provide your
broker with instructions, under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, your
broker will not be authorized to vote your street name shares with respect to
any proposal other than the ratification of the independent registered public
accounting firm.
|
|
16.
|
How do I vote shares in the
Matched Asset Plan (MAP)?
|
If you participate in the MAP, you will
receive a voting instruction form for all shares you may vote under the plan.
Under the terms of the MAP, the MAP trustee votes all shares held in the CSC
Stock Fund, but each participant in the MAP may direct the trustee how to vote
the shares of Company common stock allocated to his or her account. The MAP
trustee will vote all unallocated shares of common stock held by the MAP and all
allocated shares for which no timely voting instructions are received in the
same proportion as shares for which it has received valid voting
instructions.
Regardless of which voting
method you use, the deadline
6
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
for returning your voting
instructions to the MAP trustee is 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on August 5,
2016
. If you own shares of CSC common stock
in the CSRA Inc. 401(k) Plan, you will receive separate voting instructions for
those shares from the trustee of the CSRA plan.
Confidentiality
of voting instructions
.
Your voting instructions to the MAP Trustee will be completely
confidential. In no event will your voting instructions be reported to
CSC.
|
|
17.
|
Can I change my vote after I
voted?
|
Yes. Even if you voted by telephone,
the Internet or
you requested paper proxy materials and signed the proxy card or voting
instruction card in the form accompanying this proxy statement, you retain the
power to revoke your proxy or change your vote. You can revoke your proxy or
change your vote at any time before it is exercised by giving written notice to
the Corporate Secretary of CSC, specifying such revocation. You may change your
vote by a later-dated vote by telephone, the Internet or by timely delivery of a
valid, later-dated proxy, or by voting by ballot electronically at the Annual
Meeting. However, please note that if you would like to vote at the Annual
Meeting and you are not the stockholder of record, you must request, complete
and deliver a legal proxy from your broker, bank or nominee.
|
|
18.
|
What does it mean if I receive
more than one Notice, proxy or voting instruction
card?
|
It generally means your shares are
registered differently or are in more than one account. Please provide voting
instructions for all Notices, proxy cards and voting instruction cards you
receive.
|
|
19.
|
Are there other matters to be
acted upon at the meeting?
|
The Company does not know of any matter
to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than those described in this proxy
statement. If, however, other matters are properly presented for action at the
Annual Meeting, the proxy holders named in the proxy will have the discretion to
vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.
|
|
20.
|
Who is paying for the
solicitation of proxies?
|
CSC is making this solicitation and
will pay the entire cost of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing and
distributing these proxy materials and soliciting votes. Our officers and
employees may, without any compensation other than the compensation they receive
in their capacities as officers and employees, solicit proxies personally or by
telephone, facsimile, e-mail or further mailings. We will, upon request,
reimburse brokerage firms and others for their reasonable expense in forwarding
proxy materials to beneficial owners of CSC stock. We have engaged the services
of Morrow & Co., LLC, 470 West Avenue, Stamford, CT 06902, with respect to
proxy soliciting matters at an expected cost of approximately $10,000 not
including incidental expenses.
|
|
21.
|
What if I have any questions
about voting, electronic delivery or Internet
voting?
|
Questions regarding voting, electronic
delivery or Internet voting should be directed to Investor Relations at
telephone, 703-245-9668 or e-mail address, investorrelations@csc.com.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
7
|
Table of Contents
HOW DO I
VOTE?
Your vote is important.
You may vote on the Internet, by telephone, by mail or
electronically at the Annual Meeting, all as described below. The Internet and
telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders by use of
a control number and to allow you to confirm that your instructions have been
properly recorded. If you vote by telephone or on the Internet, you do not need
to return your Notice, proxy card or voting instruction card. Telephone and
Internet voting facilities are available now and will be available 24 hours a
day until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on August 9, 2016. You also will be able to
vote your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting by visiting
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CSC (other than shares held through our MAP,
which must be voted prior to the meeting).
Vote on the Internet
If you have Internet access, you may
submit your proxy by following the instructions provided in the Notice, or if
you requested printed proxy materials, by following the instructions provided
with your proxy materials and on your proxy card or voting instruction card. On
the Internet voting site, you can confirm that your instructions have been
properly recorded. If you vote on the Internet, you can also request electronic
delivery of future proxy materials.
Vote by Telephone
You can also vote by telephone by
following the instructions provided on the Internet voting site, or if you
requested printed proxy materials, by following the instructions provided with
your proxy materials and on your proxy card or voting instruction
card.
Vote by Mail
If you elected to receive printed proxy
materials by mail, you may choose to vote by mail by marking your proxy card or
voting instruction card, dating and signing it, and returning it to Broadridge
Financial Solutions, Inc. in the postage-paid envelope provided. If the envelope
is missing, please mail your completed proxy card or voting instruction card to
CSC, c/o Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New
York 11717. Please allow sufficient time for mailing if you decide to vote by
mail.
Voting at the Annual
Meeting
The method or timing of your vote will
not limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you attend the Annual
Meeting via live webcast and vote electronically. However, if your shares are
held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, you must obtain a legal
proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record to be able to vote at
the Annual Meeting. You should allow yourself enough time prior to the Annual
Meeting to obtain this proxy from the holder of record.
The shares voted electronically, by
telephone or represented by the proxy cards received, properly marked, dated,
signed and not revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting.
8
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
CSC is committed to maintaining the
highest standards of corporate governance, which we believe are essential for
sustained success and long-term stockholder value. In light of this goal, the
Board oversees, counsels and directs management in the long-term interests of
the Company and our stockholders. The Boards responsibilities include, but are
not limited to:
●
|
overseeing the management of our
business and the assessment of our business
risks;
|
●
|
overseeing the processes for
maintaining integrity with regard to our financial statements and other
public disclosures, and compliance with law and
ethics;
|
●
|
reviewing and approving our major
financial objectives and strategic and operating plans, and other
significant actions; and
|
●
|
overseeing our talent management
and succession planning.
|
The Board discharges its
responsibilities through regularly scheduled meetings as well as telephonic
meetings, action by written consent and other communications with management as
appropriate. CSC expects directors to attend all meetings of the Board and the
Board committees upon which they serve, and all annual meetings of the Companys
stockholders at which they are standing for election or re-election as
directors. During Fiscal 2016, the Board held 15 meetings of the full Board.
During Fiscal 2016, the Audit Committee held 13 meetings, the Compensation
Committee held 8 meetings and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee held
5 meetings. No director attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of (1) the
total number of meetings of the Board, and (2) the total number of meetings held
by all committees of the Board on which he or she served during Fiscal 2016.
Each of the directors then serving attended the 2015 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
Governance is a continuing focus at
CSC, starting with the Board and extending to all employees. We solicit feedback
from our stockholders on governance and executive compensation practices and
engage in discussions with various groups and individuals on governance issues
and improvements. In this section, we describe some of our key governance
policies and practices.
Corporate Governance
Guidelines
|
The Board has long adhered to
governance principles designed to assure excellence in the execution of its
duties and regularly reviews the Companys governance policies and practices.
These principles are outlined in CSCs Corporate Governance Guidelines (the
Guidelines), which, in conjunction with our Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation (Articles of Incorporation), Amended and Restated Bylaws
(Bylaws), Code of Business Conduct (Code of Conduct), Board committee
charters and related policies, form the framework for the effective governance
of CSC.
The full text of the Guidelines, the
charters for each of the Board committees, the Code of Conduct, the Equity Grant
Policy, the Related Party Transactions Policy and Clawback Policy are available
on CSCs Website, www.csc.com, under Corporate Governance. These materials are
also available in print to any person, without charge, upon request, by calling
703-245-9668 or writing to:
Investor Relations
CSC
1775 Tysons Boulevard
Tysons, VA
22102
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
9
|
Table of Contents
Board Leadership
Structure
|
The Boards leadership structure
consists of a Chairman and CEO, a lead independent director (the Lead
Director) and strong committee chairs. The Board regularly reviews its
leadership structure and has determined that combining the offices of CEO and
Chairman, coupled with a Lead Director with broad authority and responsibility,
is the most effective leadership model for the Company. The Board also believes
this structure provides independent Board leadership and engagement, while
providing the benefit of having our CEO, who manages CSCs day-to-day
operations, chair regular Board meetings as we discuss key business and
strategic issues. Our current Chairman and CEO, J. Michael Lawrie, was appointed
by the Board on December 15, 2015 following the resignation of Mr. Rodney F.
Chase. Mr. Lawrie has more than 30 years of industry experience, extensive
senior level management experience and familiarity with the global aspects of
our business and operations. In accordance with the Guidelines, the independent
directors have designated Bruce Churchill, the former president of DIRECTV Latin
America LLC, to serve as Lead Director through the Annual Meeting. As a general
matter, the Lead Director serves for a term of two years, and may not serve for
more than two consecutive terms.
As Lead Director, Mr. Churchill has the
following duties and responsibilities:
●
|
presiding over executive sessions
of independent directors;
|
●
|
chairing meetings of the Board of
Directors in the absence of the Chairman of the Board;
|
●
|
acting as a liaison between the
independent directors and the Chairman of the Board;
|
●
|
coordinating with the Chairman of
the Board regarding meeting agendas and
schedules;
|
●
|
coordinating with the Chairman of
the Board regarding information flow to the Board;
|
●
|
being available for consultation
and communication with stockholders, as appropriate;
and
|
●
|
calling meetings of the
independent directors (executive sessions) as
appropriate.
|
CSCs governance processes include
executive sessions of the independent directors before and/or after every Board
meeting, annual evaluations by the independent directors of the CEOs
performance, succession planning, annual Board and committee self-assessments
and the various governance processes contained in the Guidelines and the Board
committee charters.
Independent
Directors
.
The Board assesses the independence
of our directors and examines the nature and extent of any relations between the
Company and our directors, their families and their affiliates. The Guidelines
provide that a director is independent if he or she satisfies the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) requirements for director independence (as set forth in
Appendix A to this proxy statement) and the Board of Directors affirmatively
determines that the director has no material relationship with CSC (either
directly, or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a
relationship with CSC). In Fiscal 2016, the Board determined that, with the
exception of our CEO, each of the remaining eight directors Mukesh Aghi,
Herman E. Bulls, Bruce B. Churchill, Mark Foster, Sachin Lawande, Brian
MacDonald, Peter Rutland and Robert F. Woods is independent. In addition, the
Board determined that director nominee Lizabeth H. Zlatkus is
independent.
Independent
Director Meetings
.
The non-employee directors regularly meet in executive session
prior to the commencement and/or after the conclusion of each regularly
scheduled Board meeting, and meet at such additional times as they may
determine.
10
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Committee
Independence Requirements
.
All members
serving on the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee must be independent as defined by the Guidelines. In
addition, Audit Committee members must meet heightened independence criteria
under the rules and regulations of the NYSE and the SEC relating to audit
committees, and each Compensation Committee member must meet heightened
independence criteria under the rules and regulations of the NYSE and the SEC
relating to compensation committees, be a non-employee director pursuant to
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) and an
outside director for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the Internal Revenue Code).
Oversight of Risk
Management
|
We believe our Board leadership
structure supports a risk-management process in which senior management is
responsible for our day-to-day risk-management processes and the Board provides
oversight of our risk management. As part of its oversight responsibility, the
Board oversees and maintains our governance and compliance processes and
procedures to promote high standards of responsibility, ethics and
integrity.
Management
Role
.
In order for us to identify and
mitigate our risk exposures, we have established an Enterprise Risk Management
(ERM) function to (i) identify risks in the strategic, operational, financial
reporting and compliance domains
for the Company as a whole, as well as for each
operating unit, and (ii) evaluate the effectiveness of existing mitigation
strategies. The ERM function reports to the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), and
coordinates and reviews assessments of internal processes and controls for
ongoing compliance with internal policies and legal regulatory requirements. The
ERM function periodically reports potential areas of risk to the Board and its
committees.
Our enterprise risk, issue and
opportunity management framework is centralized under a single executive owner.
In Fiscal 2016, we deployed consistent processes, definitions and tools to
proactively address operational, financial, compliance and strategic risks,
issues and opportunities.
Board
Role
.
The Board has overall
responsibility for oversight of risk and assesses our strategic and operational
risks throughout the year on an ongoing basis. Members of senior management
regularly report on the opportunities and risks faced by the Company in the
markets in which we conduct business.
Committee
Role
.
In fulfilling its oversight
role, the Board delegates certain risk management oversight responsibility to
the Boards committees. The committees meet regularly and report any significant
issues and recommendations discussed during the committee meetings to the Board.
Specifically, each committee fulfills the following oversight roles:
●
|
The Audit Committee oversees
risks related to accounting, financial reporting processes and internal
controls of CSC as well as reviews our policies and practices with respect
to risk assessment and risk management. During the Audit Committee review,
the Committee discusses the Companys major risk exposures and the steps
that have been taken to monitor and control such exposures with management
and meets separately with management, internal auditors and independent
auditors. The Audit Committee reports the results of its review to the
Board.
|
●
|
The Compensation Committee
monitors the risks associated with succession planning, leadership
development, and compensation plans, including evaluating the effect that
the Companys executive and sales compensation plans may have on decision
making.
|
●
|
The Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee monitors the risks related to the Companys
governance structure and process. The Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee is responsible for developing and implementing a director
evaluation program to measure the individual and collective performance of
directors and the fulfillment of their responsibilities
to
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
11
|
Table of Contents
|
our stockholders, including an
assessment of the Boards compliance with applicable corporate governance
requirements and identification of areas in which the Board might improve
its performance. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee also is
responsible for developing and implementing an annual self-evaluation
process for the Board designed to assure that directors contribute to our
corporate governance and to our performance. These tasks are accomplished
in part through our annual Board
evaluation.
|
During Fiscal 2016, CSC management
reviewed its executive and non-executive compensation programs and determined
that none of its compensation programs encourages or creates unnecessary risk
taking, and none is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the
Company. In conducting this assessment, CSC inventoried its executive and
non-executive plans and programs and analyzed the components and design features
of these programs in the context of risk mitigation. A summary of the findings
of the assessment was provided to the Compensation Committee and the Board.
Overall, CSC concluded that (1) CSCs executive compensation programs provide a
mix of awards with performance criteria and design features that mitigate
excessive risk taking; (2) non-executive employee (non-sales) arrangements are
primarily fixed compensation (salary and benefits) with limited incentive
opportunity and do not encourage excessive risk taking; and (3) sales force
incentive compensation plans moderate risk by using metrics that focus on
driving sales growth, but not at the expense of profitability. CSC also
considered its robust executive stock ownership guidelines, clawback policy and
anti-hedging policy as risk mitigating features of its executive compensation
program.
Equity Ownership
Guidelines
|
Under stock ownership guidelines
adopted by the Board, Board members, other than the CEO, have an equity
ownership requirement of five times their annual retainer to be achieved over a
five-year period. Restricted stock units, as well as directly held shares, are
taken into account for purposes of determining whether requirements have been
met. Stock ownership guidelines for the executive officers, including the CEO,
are described under Compensation Discussion and Analysis Additional
Compensation Policies Equity Ownership Guidelines.
Talent Management and
Succession Planning
|
Our Compensation Committee and Board
are actively engaged and involved in succession planning and talent management
and they engage annually in a review of succession plans in August. The annual
review focuses on emerging talent and key positions at the executive officer and
operating unit leadership level that are important to the execution of our
strategic priorities and are critical to achieving our business goals. The
Compensation Committee is also updated on issues relating to the overall
workforce such as diversity, health and welfare benefits, performance
management, turnover, attrition and engagement.
The Board recognizes the importance of
its members keeping current on Company and industry issues and their
responsibilities as directors. All new directors attend orientation training
soon after being elected to the Board. Also, the Board encourages attendance at
continuing education programs for Board members, which may include internal
strategy or topical meetings, third-party presentations, and externally-offered
programs.
12
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Oversight of Related Party
Transactions
|
The Company has adopted a written
policy requiring the approval of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee
of all transactions in excess of $120,000 between the Company and any related
person (Interested Transactions). For the purposes of this policy, a related
person is any person who was in any of the following categories at any time
during Fiscal 2016:
●
|
A director or executive officer
of the Company;
|
●
|
Any nominee for
director;
|
●
|
Any immediate family member of a
director or executive officer, or of any nominee for director. Immediate
family members are any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse,
sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law,
brother-in-law, or sister-in-law of such director, executive officer or
nominee for director, and any person (other than a tenant or employee)
sharing the household of such director, executive officer or nominee for
director; and
|
●
|
Any person who was in any of the
following categories when a transaction in which such person had a direct
or indirect material interest occurred or
existed:
|
|
○
|
Any beneficial owner of more than
5% of the Companys common stock; or
|
|
○
|
Any immediate family member, as
defined above, of any such beneficial
owner.
|
An Interested
Transaction
includes any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship
(including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) or any series of
similar transactions, arrangements or relationships.
In determining whether to approve an
Interested Transaction, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will take
into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the Interested
Transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an
unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent
of the related partys interest in the transaction. No director will participate
in any discussion or approval of an Interested Transaction for which he or she
(or an immediate family member) is a related party, except that the director
will provide all material information concerning the Interested Transaction to
the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee.
There have been no transactions since
April 4, 2015 (
i.e
., the first day of Fiscal 2016), nor are there any currently proposed
transactions, in which the Company was or is to be a participant and the amount
involved exceeds $120,000, which required the approval of the
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee under our interested transaction
policy or in which any related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect
material interest and which is required to be disclosed under applicable SEC
rules.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
13
|
Table of Contents
Code of Ethics and Standards of
Conduct
|
CSC is committed to high standards of
ethical conduct and professionalism, and our Code of Conduct confirms our
commitment to ethical behavior in the conduct of all CSC activities and reflects
our CLEAR values. The Code of Conduct applies to all directors, officers
(including our CEO, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer (PAO)) and employees
of CSC and it sets forth our policies and expectations on a number of topics,
including avoiding conflicts of interest, confidentiality, insider trading,
protection of CSC and customer property and providing a proper and professional
work environment. We maintain a worldwide toll-free and internet-based helpline,
the CSC OpenLine, which employees can use to communicate any ethics-related
concerns, and we provide training on ethics and compliance topics for all
employees. The CSC OpenLine is administered by a third-party provider. The
ethics and compliance function resides in the Ethics and Compliance Office and
is managed by CSCs Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer.
In Fiscal 2016, there were no waivers
of any provisions of the Code of Conduct for the CEO, CFO or PAO. In the event
we amend or waive any provision of the Code of Conduct applicable to our CEO,
CFO and PAO, we intend to disclose these actions on our website.
Our policy on Board diversity is set
forth in the Guidelines, which provide that Board membership should reflect
diversity in many respects, by including, for example, persons diverse in
geography, gender and ethnicity. In addition, the Nominating/Corporate
Governance Committee seeks to maintain a mix of individuals who possess
experience in the sectors in which we operate, such as international business,
technology, health care, government service and public policy, as well as those
having backgrounds as executives in operations, finance, accounting, marketing
and sales. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee deems this policy to be
effective.
Mandatory Retirement of
Directors
|
Under our bylaws, directors must retire
by the close of the first annual meeting of stockholders held after they reach
age 72, unless the Board determines that it is in the best interests of CSC and
its stockholders for the director to continue to serve until the close of a
subsequent annual meeting.
Resignation of Employee
Directors
|
Under the Guidelines, the CEO must
offer to resign from the Board when he or she ceases to be a CSC
employee.
Communicating with the Board or
the Chairman
|
Stockholders and other interested
parties may communicate with the Board, individual directors, the non-management
directors as a group, or with the non-executive Chairman, by writing in care of
the Corporate Secretary, Computer Sciences Corporation, 1775 Tysons Boulevard,
Tysons, VA 22102. The Corporate Secretary reviews all submissions and forwards
to members of the Board all appropriate communications that in his judgment are
not offensive or otherwise objectionable and do not constitute commercial
solicitations.
14
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
BOARD STRUCTURE
AND COMMITTEE COMPOSITION
As of the date of this proxy statement,
the Board has nine directors and three standing committees: the Audit Committee,
the Compensation Committee and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. If
director nominee Lizabeth H. Zlatkus is elected by stockholders at the Annual
Meeting, the Board will have ten directors.
Each director serving on the Audit
Committee, Compensation Committee or Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee
must be independent. In addition:
●
|
Each Audit Committee member must
meet heightened independence criteria under the rules and regulations of
the NYSE and the SEC relating to audit committees, and must be financially
literate.
No member of the Audit Committee
may simultaneously serve on the audit committees of more than three other
public companies unless the Board determines that such simultaneous
service would not impair the members ability to effectively serve on the
Audit Committee. No member of the Audit Committee serves on another public
company audit committee. Ms. Lizabeth H. Zlatkus, a nominee for election
to the Board at the Annual Meeting, serves on the audit committee of two
other public company boards.
|
●
|
Messrs. MacDonald and Woods each
qualifies as an audit committee financial expert for purposes of the
rules of the SEC, and all members of the Committee are financially
literate. Ms. Lizabeth H. Zlatkus, a nominee for election to the Board at
the Annual Meeting, has extensive experience in corporation finance and
accounting, including as former Chief Financial Officer of The Hartford
Financial Services Group. If elected, Ms. Zlatkus will serve on the
Companys Audit Committee and qualifies as an audit committee financial
expert for purposes of the rules of the SEC.
|
●
|
Each Compensation Committee
member must meet heightened independence criteria under the rules and
regulations of the NYSE and SEC relating to compensation committees, be a
non-employee director for purposes of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the
Exchange Act and an outside director for purposes of Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code. The Board has determined that each committee
member satisfies all applicable requirements for membership on that
committee.
|
●
|
The current committee membership,
the number of meetings during the last fiscal year and the function of
each of the standing committees are described
below.
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
15
|
Table of Contents
Audit Committee
|
|
|
Number of Fiscal
|
Committee
|
Current
Members
|
Primary
Responsibilities
|
2016 Meetings
|
Audit
|
Brian P. MacDonald
(Chairman)
J. Michael Lawrie,
ex-officio
Peter Rutland
Robert F.
Woods
|
➢
Oversees financial
reporting, accounting, control and compliance matters.
➢
Appoints and
evaluates the independent auditor.
➢
Reviews with the
internal and independent auditors the scope, results and adequacy of their
audits and effectiveness of internal controls.
➢
Reviews material
financial disclosures.
➢
Pre-approves all audit and
permitted non-audit services.
➢
Annually reviews the
Companys compliance programs and receives regular updates about
compliance matters.
➢
Annually reviews the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures.
➢
Reviews, and makes
recommendations to the Board about related person
transactions.
|
13
|
Anyone with questions or complaints
regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters may
communicate them to the Audit Committee by calling CSCs Open Line available at
http://www. cscopenline.ethicspoint.com. Calls may be confidential or anonymous.
All such questions and complaints will be forwarded to the Audit Committee for
its review and will be simultaneously reviewed and addressed under the direction
of the Head of Internal Audit. The Audit Committee may direct special treatment,
including the retention of outside advisors, for any concern communicated to it.
The Code of Conduct prohibits retaliation against CSC employees for any report
or communication made in good faith through the Open Line.
Compensation
Committee
|
|
|
Number of
Fiscal
|
Committee
|
Current Members
|
Primary Responsibilities
|
2016
Meetings
|
Compensation
|
Mark Foster
(Chairman)
Mukesh Aghi
Sachin Lawande
J. Michael Lawrie,
ex-officio
|
➢
Approves and recommends full Board approval of the CEOs
compensation based upon an evaluation of his performance by the
independent directors.
➢
Reviews and approves senior managements compensation.
➢
Administers incentive and equity compensation plans and, in
consultation with senior management, approves compensation
policies.
➢
Reviews executive compensation disclosures and the annual
compensation risk assessment.
|
8
|
16
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation
. None of
the members of the Compensation Committee was at any time during Fiscal 2016, or
at any other time, one of our officers or employees. Mr. Lawrie is an ex-officio
(non-voting) member of the Compensation Committee. No executive officer of the
Company served or serves on the compensation committee or board of any company
that employed or employs any member of the Compensation Committee or
Board.
Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee
|
|
|
Number of
Fiscal
|
Committee
|
Current
Members
|
Primary
Responsibilities
|
2016
meetings
|
Nominating/ Corporate
Governance
|
Bruce B.
Churchill
(Chairman)
Mukesh Aghi
Herman E. Bulls
J. Michael
Lawrie,
ex-officio
|
➢
Monitors the Boards structure and
operations.
➢
Sets criteria for Board membership.
➢
Searches for and screens candidates to fill Board
vacancies and recommends candidates for election.
➢
Evaluates director and Board performance and assesses
Board composition and size.
➢
Evaluates the Companys corporate governance
process.
➢
Recommends to the Board whether to accept the
resignation of incumbent directors that fail to be re-elected in
uncontested elections.
|
5
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
17
|
Table of Contents
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Mr. Lawrie, as CEO and Chairman of the
Board, does not receive any separate compensation for his Board activities. The
following table sets forth the annual retainer and attendance fees paid to our
non-employee directors.
Fiscal 2016 Director Retainers and
Fees
|
Annual
Retainer
1
|
|
$90,000
|
Annual Equity Award
2
|
|
$200,000
|
Lead Independent Director
Retainer
1,3
|
|
$35,000
|
Audit Committee Chairman
Retainer
1
|
|
$20,000
|
Compensation Committee
Chairman Retainer
1
|
|
$15,000
|
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee
Chairman Retainer
1
|
|
$10,000
|
Committee Member
Retainer
1
|
|
$10,000
|
Additional Meeting Attendance
Fee
1,4
|
|
$2,500 per
meeting
|
____________________
1.
|
|
Amounts payable in cash may be deferred pursuant to the Companys
Deferred Compensation Plan, which is described further below in this proxy
statement.
|
|
2.
|
|
The Annual Equity Award is payable in the form of restricted stock
units (RSU) awards that vest in full at the earlier of (i) the first
anniversary of the grant date or (ii) the next Annual Meeting date, and
are automatically redeemed for CSC stock and dividend equivalents either
at that time or, if an RSU deferral election form is submitted, upon the
date or event elected by the director. Directors may elect to receive
deferred RSUs at either a fixed in-service distribution date, which may be
in August of any year after the year in which the RSUs vest within 15
years of the grant date, or upon their separation from the Board.
Distributions made upon a directors separation from the Board may occur
in either a lump sum or in annual installments over periods of 5, 10 or 15
years, per the directors election. In addition, restricted stock units
vest in full upon a change in control of the Company.
|
|
|
|
The Annual Equity Award value for
non-employee directors was increased in Fiscal 2016 from $160,000 to
$200,000 to remain competitive with the compensation practices of our peer
group. This increase became effective upon the completion of the Companys
spin-off of CSRA Inc. (formerly known as Computer Sciences Government
Services Inc.) on November 27, 2015 (the Separation).
|
|
3.
|
|
Prior to December 15, 2015, our Board had a non-executive Chairman,
Mr. Chase, who was entitled to an Annual Equity Award valued at $350,000
and an annual cash retainer of $150,000. As of December 15, 2015, Mr.
Lawrie was elected the Chairman of the Board and Mr. Churchill was elected
to the newly established position of Lead Independent Director, for which
he receives an annual cash retainer of $35,000.
|
|
4.
|
|
For meetings, special projects and assignments involving travel,
once a director has exceeded (i) an aggregate of 8 Board meetings,
projects and assignments or (ii) an aggregate of committee meetings,
projects and assignments equal to 6 times the number of committees on
which the director serves.
|
18
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth for each
of the non-employee directors certain information with respect to compensation
earned in Fiscal 2016.
|
|
Fees
Earned
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
or Paid in
Cash
|
|
Stock
Awards
2
|
|
Total
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
Mukesh Aghi
|
|
$
|
32,283
|
|
$
|
130,770
|
|
$
|
163,053
|
David J. Barram
3
|
|
|
98,814
|
|
|
162,285
|
|
|
261,099
|
Erik
Brynjolfsson
4
|
|
|
82,500
|
|
|
162,374
|
|
|
244,874
|
Herman E. Bulls
|
|
|
29,348
|
|
|
130,770
|
|
|
160,118
|
Rodney F.
Chase
4
|
|
|
112,500
|
|
|
358,571
|
|
|
471,071
|
Bruce B. Churchill
|
|
|
116,100
|
|
|
307,862
|
|
|
423,962
|
Mark Foster
|
|
|
68,179
|
|
|
307,862
|
|
|
376,041
|
Nancy Killefer
5
|
|
|
75,625
|
|
|
159,648
|
|
|
235,273
|
Sachin Lawande
|
|
|
80,706
|
|
|
335,022
|
|
|
415,728
|
Brian P. MacDonald
|
|
|
137,500
|
|
|
307,862
|
|
|
445,362
|
Sean
OKeefe
5
|
|
|
65,761
|
|
|
159,648
|
|
|
225,409
|
Peter Rutland
|
|
|
47,880
|
|
|
169,736
|
|
|
217,616
|
Robert F. Woods
|
|
|
46,195
|
|
|
169,736
|
|
|
215,931
|
____________________
1.
|
|
Column (b) reflects all cash compensation earned during Fiscal
2016, whether or not payment was deferred pursuant to the Deferred
Compensation Plan.
|
|
2.
|
|
Each director serving as a non-employee director as of the close of
our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on August 14, 2015, other than Mr.
Chase, received 2,400 RSUs determined by (i) dividing $160,000 by the
closing price of our Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange Composite
Tape on the grant date of August 19, 2015 ($66.52) and (ii) rounding the
result to the nearest multiple of 100. Mr. Chase received 5,300 RSUs,
determined by dividing $350,000 by the closing price of our Common Stock
on the grant date ($66.52) and rounding to the nearest multiple of 100.
The RSUs were originally scheduled to vest in full on the date of our 2016
annual meeting (August 10, 2016).
|
|
|
|
In connection with the
Separation, 50% of the RSUs previously granted to each non-employee
director on August 19, 2015 vested and the remaining 50% were cancelled.
We awarded additional RSUs to each director with respect to the cancelled
portion of the Fiscal 2016 RSU awards with a grant-date value equal to the
product of (x) the number of RSUs subject to the cancelled portion of the
Fiscal 2016 RSU awards multiplied by (y) $2.25, which was the portion of
the special dividend of $10.50 per share payable by us in connection with
the Separation (the Lost Dividend RSUs). The Lost Dividend RSUs were
100% vested of the date of grant. Each non-employee director (including
Mr. Barram, who retired prior to the Separation) other than Mr. Chase
received 87 Lost Dividend RSUs, and Mr. Chase received 192 Lost Dividend
RSUs. In addition, on December 15, 2015, each of Messrs. Churchill,
Foster, Lawande and MacDonald received an additional award of 4,800 RSUs
to make up for the cancelled portion of their pre-Separation RSU award.
These post-Separation RSU awards will vest on August 10, 2016 and are
automatically redeemed for shares of our Common Stock and dividend
equivalents.
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
19
|
Table of Contents
Messrs. Rutland and Woods, who joined
our Board on October 14, 2015, each received a pro-rated annual RSU grant of
5,600 RSUs on December 15, 2015, and Messrs. Aghi and Bulls, who joined our
Board on December 15, 2015, each received a pro-rated annual RSU grant of 4,500
RSUs on January 15, 2016, in each case based on the post-Separation Annual
Equity Retainer amount of $200,000, the closing price of our Common Stock on the
applicable grant date, and the number of days of their service on our Board
between our 2015 and 2016 annual meetings, rounding the result to the nearest
multiple of 100. These RSU awards will vest on August 10, 2016 and are
automatically redeemed for shares of our Common Stock and dividend
equivalents.
In addition, on July 15, 2015, Mr.
Lawande received a pro-rata annual RSU grant of 400 RSUs relating to the period
between the date on which he joined our Board (June 10, 2015) and the date of
our 2015 annual meeting (August 14, 2015). These RSUs vested on August 14,
2015.
Column (c) reflects the grant date fair
value computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 - Compensation - Stock Compensation
(FASB ASC Topic 718) in connection with the RSUs granted during Fiscal 2016.
For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation of restricted stock
and RSUs, reference is made to the section of Note 1 of the Consolidated
Financial Statements in the Companys 2016 Annual Report providing details of
the Companys accounting under FASB ASC Topic 718. The aggregate number of stock
awards outstanding for each director at fiscal year-end are as
follows:
|
|
Aggregate
Stock
|
|
|
Awards
Outstanding
|
Name
|
|
as of April 1, 2016
|
Mukesh Aghi
|
|
4,500
|
Herman E. Bulls
|
|
4,500
|
Bruce B.
Churchill
|
|
4,800
|
Mark Foster
|
|
4,800
|
Sachin Lawande
|
|
4,800
|
Brian P. MacDonald
|
|
7,500
|
Peter Rutland
|
|
5,600
|
Robert F. Woods
|
|
5,600
|
3.
|
|
Mr. Barram retired from our Board
on October 14, 2015. In connection with his retirement, he received
accelerated vesting of the 1,200 RSUs granted him on August 19, 2015 that
would have otherwise become vested upon the Separation. In addition, as
noted in footnote 2 above, Mr. Barram also received the Lost Dividend RSU
award that he would otherwise have received in connection with the portion
of his Fiscal 2016 RSU award that would otherwise have been cancelled in
connection with the Separation. We also paid Mr. Barram a cash payment of
$8,814 with respect to the Lost Dividend RSUs that he would have been
eligible to receive from CSRA had he remained a director through the
Separation, which is included in column (b) above.
|
|
4.
|
|
Messrs. Brynjolfsson and Chase
each retired from our Board on December 15, 2015.
|
|
5.
|
|
Ms. Killefer and Mr. OKeefe each
retired from our Board on the date of the Separation in order to become
directors of CSRA.
|
20
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our Board of Directors has nominated
ten persons for election as directors at the 2016 Annual Meeting to hold office
until the 2017 Annual Meeting or until their successors have been elected and
qualified. Under our Bylaws, directors must retire by the close of the first
annual meeting of stockholders held after they reach age 72, unless the Board
determines that it is in the best interests of CSC and its stockholders for the
director to continue to serve until the close of a subsequent annual
meeting.
Directors are elected by a majority
vote in uncontested elections; therefore, each director nominee must receive a
majority of the votes cast with respect to such nominee at the Annual Meeting
(
i.e.
, the
number of FOR votes must exceed the number of AGAINST votes). In accordance
with the Guidelines, if an incumbent director nominee fails to receive the
requisite number of votes, such director nominee shall promptly tender his or
her resignation for consideration by the Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee.
It is intended that the accompanying
proxy, if executed and returned with no voting instructions indicated, will be
voted for the election to the Board of the ten director nominees in this proxy
statement.
Director Nomination
Process
|
The Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee is responsible for reviewing and assessing with the Board the
appropriate skills, experience, and background sought for Board members in the
context of our business and then-current membership on the Board. This
assessment of Board skills, experience, and background includes numerous diverse
factors including independence, experience, age and gender and ethnic diversity.
In addition, the Board believes that current and potential directors
collectively should possess the following mix of skills and
attributes:
●
|
Professional and personal ethics
and values
|
●
|
International business
experience
|
●
|
Senior level management or
operations experience
|
●
|
Financial literacy and
expertise
|
●
|
Government and public policy
experience
|
●
|
Experience in areas of CSCs
business
|
●
|
Experience in major academic
institution
|
●
|
Independence
|
●
|
Public company governance
experience
|
|
|
In evaluating potential director
nominees, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee considers each of these
attributes. The Committee then considers the contribution they would make to the
quality of the Boards decision making and effectiveness.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee will also consider potential director candidates recommended by
stockholders as described under Business for 2017 Annual Meeting at the end of
this Proxy Statement. The Committee has retained from time to time third-party
search firms to identify qualified director candidates and to assist the
Committee in evaluating candidates that have been identified by others. Messrs.
Aghi, Bulls, Rutland and Woods as well as Ms. Zlatkus were recommended to the
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee by a third-party search
firm.
COMPUTER SCIENCES
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
21
|
Table of Contents
Each of the nominees has a strong
reputation and experience in areas relevant to the strategy and operations of
the Companys businesses, particularly industries and growth segments that the
Company serves, such as technology, financial services, international business
and government, as well as key geographic markets where it operates. Each of the
nominees holds or has held senior executive positions in large, complex
organizations or has relevant operating experience or experience in a major
academic institution. In these positions, they have also gained experience in
core management skills, such as strategic and financial planning, public company
financial reporting, corporate governance, risk management, thought leadership,
executive management and leadership development. Many of our directors also have
experience serving on boards of directors and board committees of other public
companies.
The Board also believes that each of
the nominees has other key attributes that are important to an effective board:
integrity and demonstrated high ethical standards, sound judgment, analytical
skills, the ability to engage management and each other in a constructive and
collaborative fashion, diversity of origin, background, experience and thought,
and the commitment to devote significant time and energy to service on the Board
and its committees.
The biographies of each of the nominees
below contain information as of the date of this proxy statement regarding the
persons service as a director, director positions held currently or at any time
during the last five years and skills, experience and qualifications that led to
the conclusion that such person should serve as one of our directors.
|
|
|
Mukesh
Aghi
Age: 60
Director Since: 2015
|
|
CSC Committees:
●
Compensation
●
Nominating/Corporate Governance
|
|
|
Mr. Aghi is president of U.S.-India
Business Counsel (USIBC), a business advocacy organization for the U.S. in
India. Prior to his service as president of USIBC, Mr. Aghi served as Chief
Executive Officer of L&T Infotech from 2012 to 2015 and as Chairman and CEO
of Steria India Ltd. from 2007 to 2012.
Skills and Qualifications:
|
●
|
Senior Level Management
Experience:
Former Chief Executive
Officer of L&T Infotech and Steria India Ltd.
|
●
|
Government and Public Policy
Experience:
Current President of
USIBC
|
●
|
Experience in CSCs Business
Areas:
Extensive executive experience
in the technology sector
|
●
|
International Business
Experience:
Extensive chief executive
and operational experience in an international technology
company
|
|
|
22
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
Herman E.
Bulls
Age: 60
Director Since: 2015
|
|
CSC Committees:
●
Nominating/Corporate Governance
|
|
Public
Directorships:
●
Comfort Systems USA
●
Tyco International Ltd.
Private
Directorships:
●
West Point Association of Graduates Board of Directors
●
USAA
|
Mr. Bulls has served in various roles
at Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) since 1989, including Chief Executive Officer,
Public Institutions, and Chairman, Public Institutions. Currently, Mr. Bulls
serves as Vice Chairman, Americas at JLL. Mr. Bulls has served as a director of
Comfort Systems USA, Inc. since 2001 and of Tyco International Ltd. since 2013,
and served as a director of Exelis, Inc. from 2011 to 2015.
Skills and
Qualifications:
|
●
|
Public Company Governance
Experience:
Experience as a director of
two public companies in addition to CSC
|
●
|
Senior Level Management
Experience:
Former Chief Executive
Officer, Chairman and Vice Chairman of various divisions of a major global
real estate services company
|
●
|
Financial
Literacy:
Extensive experience in
finance and accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce
Churchill
Age: 58
Director Since: 2014
|
|
CSC Committees:
●
Nominating/Corporate Governance (Chair)
|
|
|
Mr. Churchill assumed the role of Lead
Independent Director of the Board of CSC on December 15, 2015. Mr. Churchill
served as the Executive Vice President of DIRECTV, President of DIRECTV Latin
America LLC and as President-New Enterprises from January 2004 to August 2015.
He served as Chief Financial Officer of DIRECTV from January 2004 to March 2005.
Prior to joining DIRECTV, Mr. Churchill served as President and Chief Operating
Officer of STAR, a position he held beginning in May 2000. Previously, he served
as the Deputy Chief Executive Officer of STAR since 1996. Prior to joining STAR,
Mr. Churchill served as Senior Vice President, Finance at Fox
Television.
Skills and Qualifications:
|
●
|
Senior Level Management
Experience:
Executive Vice President of
DIRECTV, a provider of digital television entertainment in the United
States, Latin America and Asia
|
●
|
International Business
Experience:
Extensive experience as an
operating executive in Latin America and Asia
|
●
|
Experience in CSCs Business
Areas:
Extensive experience as an
executive vice president and chief financial officer in an international
digital entertainment company
|
●
|
Financial
Literacy:
Extensive experience in
corporation finance and accounting, including as former Chief Financial
Officer of publicly traded international digital entertainment
companies
|
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
23
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
Mark
Foster
Age: 56
Director Since: 2015
|
|
CSC Committees:
●
Compensation (Chair)
|
|
Public
Directorships:
●
Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc
●
Atento S.A.
|
Mr. Foster served as Group Chief
Executive-Management Consulting of Accenture plc (Accenture), a global
management consulting, technology services and outsourcing company, from
September 2006 until his retirement from Accenture in March 2011. In addition,
Mr. Foster was the head of Accentures Global Markets area from September 2009
until March 2011 with oversight of the firms thought leadership, industry
initiatives, investment priorities and client account leadership. Prior to that,
Mr. Foster served as Accentures Group Chief Executive-Products Operating Group
from March 2002 to September 2006 with responsibility for the firms global
business in the retail, consumer goods, industrial and health and life sciences
sectors. Prior to that, Mr. Foster worked in a variety of positions of
increasing responsibility in his 26-year career at Accenture straddling
management consulting, technology and outsourcing.
Mr. Foster has been a non-executive
director of Heidrick & Struggles, the Nasdaq-quoted global executive search
company since 2011. He has served as a non-employee director of Atento S.A and
Alexander Mann Solutions since 2015. He also served as a non-executive director
of Fidessa PLC, a FTSE 250 software company headquartered in the United Kingdom
from 2012 to 2014.
Skills and Qualifications:
|
●
|
Senior Level Management
Experience:
Group Chief
Executive-Management Consulting of Accenture
|
●
|
International Business
Experience:
Extensive experience as an
executive with a global management consulting, technology services and
outsourcing company
|
●
|
Public Company Governance
Experience:
Experience as a director in
two other public companies
|
●
|
Experience in CSCs Business
Areas:
Extensive global experience in
professional services, technology and outsourcing
|
|
|
24
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
Sachin
Lawande
Age: 49
Director Since: 2015
|
|
CSC Committees:
●
Compensation
|
|
Public
Directorships:
●
Visteon Corporation
|
Mr. Lawande is currently President and
Chief Executive Officer of Visteon Corporation. From 2013 to 2015, Mr. Lawande
served as Executive Vice President and President of Harman International
Industries, Inc.s Infotainment Division. From 2011 to 2013, Mr. Lawande served
the dual role as the Co-President of Harmans Lifestyle and Infotainment
Divisions. Prior to that he served as Chief Innovation Officer, Chief Technology
Officer, and Co-President of Harmans Automotive Division, responsible for
guiding software strategy, development partnerships, and key customer
relationships. He was instrumental in launching an offshore development center
in India as part of Harmans strategy for optimizing its global engineering
footprint. Mr. Lawande joined Harman International in 2006, following senior
roles at QNX Software Systems and 3Com Corporation.
Skills and Qualifications:
|
●
|
Senior Level Management
Experience:
President and Chief
Executive Officer of Visteon Corporation, a global automotive parts supply
company and as an executive vice president and chief technology officer in
an international digital audio company
|
●
|
International Business
Experience:
Extensive international
experience as Chief Executive Officer of a global automotive parts supply
company and as a President of a division of an international digital audio
company
|
●
|
Experience in CSCs Business
Areas:
Extensive experience as the
Chief Executive Officer of a global automotive parts supply company and as
an executive vice president and chief technology officer in an
international digital audio company
|
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
25
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
J. Michael
Lawrie
Age: 63
Director Since: 2012
|
|
CSC Committees:
●
Audit (ex officio)
●
Compensation (ex officio)
●
Nominating/Corporate Governance (ex officio)
|
|
Public
Directorships:
●
CSRA Inc.
Private
Directorships:
●
Drexel University
|
Mr. Lawrie became a member of the Board
of Directors on February 7, 2012, President and Chief Executive Officer of CSC
on March 19, 2012, and Chairman of CSC on December 15, 2015. Prior to joining
CSC, he served as Chief Executive Officer of UK-based Misys plc, a leading
global IT solutions provider to the financial services industry, from November
2006 to March 2012. From 2008 to 2010, Mr. Lawrie also served as the Executive
Chairman of Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc., an industry leader in
electronic health record solutions. Prior to that, Mr. Lawrie was a general
partner with ValueAct Capital, a San Francisco-based private investment firm,
from 2005 to 2006. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Siebel Systems, Inc.,
an international software and solutions company, from 2004 to 2005. Previously,
Mr. Lawrie spent 27 years with IBM where he held various leadership positions,
including Senior Vice President and Group Executive, responsible for sales and
distribution of all IBM products and services worldwide; General Manager for
operations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa; and General Manager of
Industries for the Asia Pacific. Mr. Lawrie is the former lead independent,
non-executive Director of Juniper Networks, Inc., and is also a Trustee of
Drexel University, Philadelphia.
Skills and Qualifications:
|
●
|
Senior Level Management
Experience:
Former Chief Executive
Officer of Misys plc and Siebel Systems, Inc. Former Executive Chairman of
Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
|
●
|
Public Company Governance
Experience:
Experience as a former
director of Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. and a former
director of Juniper Networks, Inc.
|
●
|
International Business
Experience:
Extensive international
experience as chief executive of a leading global IT solutions provider to
the financial services industry
|
●
|
Experience in CSCs Business
area:
Extensive experience in the IT
sector
|
|
|
26
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
Brian Patrick
MacDonald
Age: 50
Director Since: 2013
|
|
CSC Committees:
●
Audit (Chair)
|
|
Public
Directorships:
●
CDK Global Inc.
|
Brian MacDonald has served as the
President and CEO of CDK Global, Inc. since January 2016. He served as the Chief
Executive Officer of Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation (HERC) from June 2014 to
June 2015. Prior to HERC, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
ETP Holdco Corporation from October 2012 to June 2013. Prior to Energy Transfer
Partners acquisition of Sunoco, Inc., in October 2012, Mr. MacDonald served as
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Sunoco, Inc., a leading
logistics and retail company based in Philadelphia, PA. He joined Sunoco in
August 2009 as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to
joining Sunoco, he was Chief Financial Officer for Dells commercial business
unit. Before becoming the commercial business units CFO in 2008, he served as
Corporate Vice President and Treasurer and led Dells mergers and acquisitions
organization and global treasury group. Prior to joining Dell, Mr. MacDonald
worked at General Motors Corporation and held a variety of positions in
financial management, including Deputy CFO for Isuzu Motors Limited. From 1998
to 2000, he served as Treasurer of GM Canada.
Skills and Qualifications:
|
●
|
Senior Level Management
Experience:
Chief Executive Officer of
a major energy and equipment rental company
|
●
|
International Business
Experience:
Extensive chief executive
and operational experience in major international public companies
|
●
|
Experience in CSCs Business
Areas:
Extensive experience in the
energy, manufacturing and IT industries
|
●
|
Financial
Literacy:
Extensive experience in
corporation finance and accounting, including as former Chief Financial
Officer of a publicly traded worldwide energy
company
|
|
|
|
Peter
Rutland
Age: 37
Director Since: 2015
|
|
CSC Committees:
●
Audit
|
|
|
Mr. Rutland is currently a partner and
Global Co-Head of Financial Services at CVC Capital Partners. Mr. Rutland joined
CVC Capital Partners in 2007, having previously worked for Advent International
since 2002. Prior to working at Advent, Mr. Rutland worked for The Goldman Sachs
Group, Inc. in its Investment Banking Division. Mr Rutland served as a director
of the NYSE-listed Avolon Holdings Ltd. from 2014 until the companys sale in
2016. He has also served on a number of private company boards, including
Domestic & General and Brit Insurance.
Skills and Qualifications:
|
●
|
Senior Level Management
Experience:
Partner at CVC Capital
Partners Ltd., an investment advisory firm
|
●
|
International Business
Experience:
Advise and execute
transactions and provide capital markets strategy advice globally
|
●
|
Public Company Governance
Experience:
Experience as a former
director of Avolon Holdings Ltd.
|
●
|
Financial
Literacy:
Extensive experience in
corporation finance and accounting, including as a partner in an
investment advisory firm
|
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
27
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
Robert F.
Woods
Age: 61
Director Since: 2015
|
|
CSC Committees:
●
Audit
|
|
|
Mr. Woods served as Senior Vice
President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of SunGard Data Systems, Inc., a
financial software solutions and services public company, from 2010 to 2012.
Prior to that, from 2004 to 2009, Mr. Woods served as Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of IKON Office Solutions, Inc., a document management
systems and services public company. Mr. Woods served as a director of Insight
Enterprises, Inc.
from 2009 to 2011.
Skills and Qualifications:
|
●
|
Senior Level Management
Experience:
Former Chief Financial
Officer of SunGard Data Systems, Inc., a financial software solutions and
services public company, and IKON Office Solutions, Inc, a document
management systems and services public company
|
●
|
Experience in CSCs Business
Areas:
Extensive executive experience
in the general public sector
|
●
|
Financial
Literacy:
Extensive experience in
corporation finance and accounting, including as former Chief Financial
Officer of two publicly traded companies and service as an audit committee
member of another publicly traded
company
|
|
|
|
Lizabeth H.
Zlatkus
Age: 57
Director Nominee
|
|
Public
Directorships:
●
Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc.
●
Legal & General Group PLC
|
|
|
Ms. Zlatkus has served as a member of
the Boston Privates Board of Directors since July 2015. Ms. Zlatkus also serves
as a Director on the Board of Legal & General Group (FTSE 100), which she
joined in December 2013. She has served on the Pennsylvania State University
Business School Board since September 2003 and has served on the Connecticut
Science Center Trustee Board since December 2010. Ms. Zlatkus held many senior
leadership positions during her tenure at The Hartford Financial Services Group
from 1983 to 2011. These included her role as Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Risk Officer of the Firm, as well as Co-President of Hartford Life Insurance
Companies. Ms. Zlatkus was selected as an Alumni Fellow of The Pennsylvania
State University in 2003.
Skills and Qualifications:
|
●
|
Senior Level Management
Experience:
Former Chief Financial
Officer of The Hartford Financial Services Group
|
●
|
International Business
Experience:
Led an international
business division for The Hartford Financial Services Group
|
●
|
Public Company Governance
Experience:
Experience as a director of
Legal & General Group PLC and Boston Private Financial Holdings,
Inc.
|
●
|
Financial
Literacy:
Extensive experience in
corporation finance and accounting, including service as an audit
committee member of two publicly traded companies
|
|
|
28
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Set forth below is a chart of the
specific qualifications, attributes, skills and experience of the Board as a
whole. While we look to each director or nominee to be knowledgeable in these
areas, and ● indicates that an item is a specific qualification, attribute,
skill or experience that the director brings to the Board, the lack of a ● for
a particular item does not mean that the director or nominee does not possess
that qualification, attribute, skill or experience:
Summary of Director Qualifications and
Experience
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional and Personal Ethics
and Values
is important given the
critical role that ethics plays in the success of our
business
|
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
Senior Level Management or
Operations Experience
signifies strong
leadership qualities and an understanding of operating plans and
strategies
|
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
Government and Public Policy
Experience
is relevant to the Companys
role as a major government contractor
|
|
●
|
●
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Academic Institution
Experience
brings perspective regarding
organizational management and academic research relevant to the Companys
business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
|
|
●
|
Public Company Governance
Experience
supports our goals of strong
accountability, transparency and protection of stockholder
interests
|
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
International Business
Experience
is important in
understanding and reviewing our global business and strategy
|
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
Experience in CSCs Business
Areas
is relevant to an understanding
of the industries served by the Company
|
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
Financial Literacy and
Expertise
is important in understanding
and overseeing our financial reporting and internal controls
|
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
Independence
is important to insure the effective oversight of
management of the Company
|
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
●
|
The Board of Directors recommends a
vote FOR each of its ten director nominees.
COMPUTER SCIENCES
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
29
|
Table of Contents
CERTAIN LITIGATION
As previously disclosed, on January 28,
2011, the Company was notified by the Division of Enforcement of the SEC that it
had commenced a formal civil investigation. That investigation covered a range
of matters as previously disclosed by the Company, including certain of the
Companys prior disclosures and accounting determinations. During the first
quarter of fiscal 2016, the Companys previously agreed upon settlement with the
SEC was formally approved by the SEC and became effective on June 5,
2015.
30
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
STOCK OWNERSHIP
The following table provides
information on Common Stock beneficially owned as of June 13, 2016,
by:
●
|
each person or group believed by
the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding Common
Stock;
|
●
|
each of the six executive
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table under Executive
Compensation, appearing further below in this proxy statement (the Named
Executive Officers or the NEOs);
|
●
|
each of the current directors of
the Company;
|
●
|
each director nominee; and
|
●
|
all executive officers and
directors, as a group.
|
Unless otherwise indicated, each person
or group has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares
beneficially owned.
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Percent of
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
1
|
|
Beneficially
Owned
|
|
Class
|
The Vanguard Group,
Inc.
|
|
11,222,121
|
2
|
|
8.06%
|
2
|
100 Vanguard
Blvd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malvern,
Pennsylvania 19355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock, Inc.
|
|
10,337,514
|
3
|
|
7.42%
|
3
|
40
East 52nd Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY
10022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Michael
Lawrie
|
|
1,172,957
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
273,664
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
William J. Deckelman,
Jr.
|
|
211,050
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
Stephen J. Hilton
|
|
66,376
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
James R. Smith
|
|
138,071
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
178,079
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
Mukesh Aghi
|
|
4,500
|
6
|
|
|
5
|
Herman E. Bulls
|
|
4,500
|
6
|
|
|
5
|
Bruce B.
Churchill
|
|
8,787
|
6
|
|
|
5
|
Mark Foster
|
|
6,087
|
6
|
|
|
5
|
Sachin Lawande
|
|
6,487
|
6
|
|
|
5
|
Brian P. MacDonald
|
|
14,387
|
6
|
|
|
5
|
Peter Rutland
|
|
5,600
|
6
|
|
|
5
|
Robert F. Woods
|
|
5,600
|
6
|
|
|
5
|
Lizabeth H.
Zlatkus
|
|
_
|
6
|
|
|
5
|
All executive officers and directors of the
Company,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as
a group (17 persons)
|
|
2,123,897
|
4,6,7
|
|
1.53%
|
|
____________________
1.
|
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person
or group is c/o Computer Sciences Corporation, 1775 Tysons Boulevard,
Tysons, Virginia 22102.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
Based solely on information contained in Schedule 13G,
Amendment No. 6, filed by The Vanguard Group (Vanguard) with the SEC on
February 11, 2016. Vanguard has sole voting power over 99,463 shares, sole
dispositive power over 11,130,758 shares, and shared dispositive power
over 91,363 shares.
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
31
|
Table of Contents
3.
|
|
Based solely on
information contained in Schedule 13G, Amendment No. 3, filed with the SEC
on January 26, 2016 by BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock). The Schedule 13G
provides that (i) BlackRock is a parent holding company or control person
and (ii) BlackRock, through its subsidiaries identified therein, has sole
voting power over 9,608,762 shares and sole dispositive power over
10,337,514 shares.
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
With respect to Messrs. Lawrie, Saleh,
Deckelman, Hilton, Smith, Zolet and all executive officers and directors
of the Company as a group, includes 760,143; 180,378; 165,684; 49,274;
94,281; 123,170; and 1,372,930 shares of common stock, respectively,
subject to employee options which were outstanding on June 13, 2016, and
currently are exercisable or which are anticipated to become exercisable
within 60 days thereafter. These shares have been deemed to be outstanding
in computing the Percent of Class.
With respect to Messrs. Lawrie, Saleh,
Deckelman, Hilton, Smith, Zolet and all executive officers and directors
of the Company as a group, includes 43,851; 14,032; 6,763; 17,102; 17,590;
11,227; and 110,565 shares of unvested restricted stock units outstanding
on June 13, 2016 which are anticipated to vest within 60 days thereafter.
Holders of unvested restricted stock units have sole voting power, but no
investment power, with respect thereto.
|
|
|
|
With respect to Messrs.
Lawrie, Saleh, Deckelman, Hilton, Smith, Zolet, and all executive officers
and directors of the Company, as a group, includes 0; 439; 4; 0; 0; 0; and
443 shares of common stock, respectively, which are held for the accounts
of such persons under the Companys Matched Asset Plan and with respect to
which such persons had the right, as of June 13, 2016, to give voting
instructions to the Committee administering the Plan.
|
|
5.
|
|
Less than
1%.
|
|
6.
|
|
With respect to, Mr.
Aghi, Mr. Bulls, Mr. Churchill, Mr. Foster, Mr. Lawande, Mr. MacDonald,
Mr. Rutland, Mr. Woods, Ms. Zlatkus and all directors of the Company, as a
group, includes (i) 0; 0; 3,987; 1,287; 1,687; 9,587; 0; 0 ; 0; and
16,548, respectively, shares of Common Stock held outright as of June 13,
2016; and (ii) and 4,500; 4,500; 4,800; 4,800; 4,800; 4,800; 5,600; 5,600;
0; and 39,400 unvested RSUs which vest in full at the 2016 Annual Meeting
and are automatically redeemed for CSC stock and dividend equivalents.
These shares have been deemed to be outstanding in computing the Percent
of Class.
|
|
7.
|
|
The executive officers
and directors, as a group, have sole voting and investment power with
respect to 1,973,932 shares.
|
32
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee reviewed and
discussed with management and Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Companys
independent auditors, the Companys audited financial statements for the Fiscal
Year ended April 1, 2016, managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting and Deloitte & Touche
LLPs evaluation of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. The
Audit Committee also discussed with the independent auditors the materials
required to be discussed by Auditing Standard
No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees,
as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). In
addition, the Audit Committee received from Deloitte & Touche LLP the
written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of
the PCAOB, and discussed with them their independence.
Based on such review and discussions,
the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board
approved, the inclusion of the audited financial statements in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended April 1, 2016 for filing
with the SEC.
The Audit Committee also appointed
Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Companys independent auditors for the Fiscal
Year ending March 31, 2017, and recommended to the Board of Directors that such
appointment be submitted to the Companys stockholders for
ratification.
Brian P. MacDonald, Chair
Robert F.
Woods
Peter Rutland
J. Michael Lawrie, ex-officio
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
33
|
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Committee
Report
|
The Compensation Discussion and
Analysis set forth below discusses the Companys executive compensation programs
and policies. The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on this review and
discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Mark Foster, Chair
Mukesh
Aghi
Sachin Lawande
J. Michael Lawrie,
ex-officio
Compensation Discussion and
Analysis
|
The Compensation Committee (the
Committee) and our Board of Directors are responsible for our executive
compensation philosophy and program, which are described in this Compensation
Discussion and Analysis (the CD&A). The CD&A also describes our Fiscal
2016 compensation decisions and the factors we considered in making those
decisions. The CD&A focuses on the compensation of our Fiscal 2016 Named
Executive Officers (NEOs):
●
|
J. Michael Lawrie, President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
●
|
Paul N. Saleh, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
|
●
|
William J. Deckelman, Jr.,
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary
|
●
|
Stephen J. Hilton, Executive Vice
President and General Manager, Global Infrastructure Services
|
●
|
James R. Smith, Executive Vice
President, Global Business Services
|
●
|
David W. Zolet, Executive Vice
President and General Manager, Americas
Region
|
Approval of the Companys Fiscal
2015 Executive Compensation on an Advisory Basis
At our most recent annual meeting of
stockholders, held on August 14, 2015, approximately 80.9% of the votes cast
(excluding abstentions and broker non-votes) voted on an advisory basis to
approve our executive compensation program for the fiscal year ended April 3,
2015 (Fiscal 2015). The Committee took into account the results of this
advisory vote in maintaining the same overall design of the Fiscal 2016
executive compensation program described below.
34
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Fiscal 2016 Executive Compensation
Programs
Our executive compensation programs are
designed to reflect our pay for performance philosophy and provide our
executives with appropriate incentives to manage the Company in the
stockholders interests. The Committee reviews our compensation policies and
practices each year to ensure that the programs provide our executives with an
appropriate mix of market-competitive compensation opportunities.
As explained in more detail below, the
Committee considered a number of factors in setting Fiscal 2016 compensation
opportunities for our NEOs, with an emphasis on continuation of the
transformation that was begun by Mr. Lawrie and his senior management team in
Fiscal 2013. Consistent with that strategy, the Committee generally maintained
the focus on increasing profitability and stockholder value and retained the
same basic structure of the executive compensation program as it used in Fiscal
2015.
In November 2015, we completed the
separation of our U.S. public sector business (the Separation), which became a
new publicly traded company under the name CSRA
Inc. (CSRA). During the brief six
months following our announcement of the Separation in May 2015, all of our
employees, including our executive officers, worked incredibly hard to make the
Separation and the subsequent merger of our U.S. public sector business with
SRA, Inc. (the Merger) a success. At the time of the Separation, we made
certain adjustments to our Fiscal 2016 executive compensation program to reflect
the Separation and the special cash dividend that was paid in connection with
the Separation, including adjustments to the performance goals under our
Employee Incentive Compensation Plan (EICP) and Fiscal 2016 performance-vested
restricted stock unit (PSU) awards. In connection with the Separation, we also
made certain adjustments to the terms of outstanding equity awards held by our
executive officers and other employees granted in Fiscal 2016 and prior years.
These adjustments are further described under the section entitled Effect of
Separation on Outstanding Equity Awards, below.
In addition, in recognition of senior
managements extraordinary efforts and successful leadership in executing the
Separation and the Merger and as a further incentive to continue the next phase
of the Companys transformation, in December 2015 the Company granted each of
the NEOs performance-based retention awards in the form of PSUs that vest
subject to the achievement of certain diluted earnings-per-share from continuing
operations (EPS) goals for our 2018 fiscal year (Fiscal 2018) and, in Mr.
Lawries case, an additional component that vests based on achievement of an EPS
hurdle for our 2017 fiscal year (Fiscal 2017) and his performance with respect
to certain organizational goals of the Company by the end of Fiscal 2017. These
awards are further described under sections entitled Fiscal 2016
Performance-Based Retention Awards, below.
The Committee also reviewed a
company-wide risk assessment of compensation programs, which revealed no
material risks that may adversely affect the Company. See Corporate Governance
Compensation and Risk above for details.
Pearl Meyer & Partners (PM&P)
continued to serve as the Committees independent compensation consultant in
Fiscal 2016. In addition to advising the Committee on general executive
compensation pay practices, PM&P was instrumental in reviewing the peer
group of companies used by the Committee to assess the competitiveness of our
executive pay levels and practices. In August 2015, the Committee revised our
peer group in anticipation of the Separation. Our revised peer group consists of
13 companies, with median revenues for these companies of approximately $7.2
billion, compared to our revenues of approximately $7.1 billion for Fiscal
2016.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
35
|
Table of Contents
Fiscal 2016 Executive Compensation
and Pay for Performance
The Companys strong performance in
Fiscal 2016 reflects the continuing success of the transformation implemented by
Mr. Lawrie and his senior leadership team. Our Fiscal 2016 accomplishments
include the successful completion of the Separation and Merger and several other
strategic transactions which have positioned the Company for long-term growth
and success.
In the prior
three years, our leadership has
focused on turning around the Company. The Separation announced in May marked a
strategic next step in our transformation journey. The separation of the U.S.
government business and merger with SRA International accelerated our
transformation and positioned both CSC and CSRA to drive innovation, growth and
leadership as two pure-play leaders focused on the interests of clients,
partners, employees and shareholders. The Separation was achieved in six months
time and accomplished with a minimum of disruption to the existing business. We
returned significant capital to stockholders, including concurrent special cash
dividends paid by CSC and CSRA, which in the aggregate totaled $10.50 per share.
Our ability to accomplish these large and complex transactions in a six-month
period is a testament to the skill and dedication of our employees and the
leadership of our executive team.
In addition to the Separation and
Merger, other significant achievements include:
●
|
Total shareholder return (TSR)
was 23.78% for Fiscal 2016. Our cumulative three-year TSR (Fiscal 2014
through Fiscal 2016) was 68.72%, compared to 39.8% for the S&P 500 and
58.7% for the S&P North American Technology Index for the same
period.
|
●
|
We formed the CeleritiFinTech
joint venture with HCL to help us seize a significant growth opportunity
in banking platform modernization.
|
●
|
We launched training
certification programs on how to design, deploy and operate applications
and infrastructure on our partners technologies, such as the AWS
cloud-computing platform.
|
●
|
We streamlined our portfolio from
more than 2,000 offerings to 15 standard offering families and simplified
our operating model.
|
●
|
We successfully completed the
acquisitions of Fruition Partners, Fixnetix, UXC International and, most
recently, Xchanging.
|
●
|
We returned $603 million to
shareholders in Fiscal 2016, including $430 million in common stock
dividends and $173 million of share
repurchases.
|
●
|
Mr. Lawrie and his leadership
team have established a global set of CLEAR (Client-focused, Leadership,
Executive excellence, Aspiration and Results) values to drive a strong
performance culture. Though these values, we have emphasized a return to
profitability by demonstrating fiscal responsibility and aligning the
executive team to this one overriding goal.
|
By design, compensation paid to our
NEOs reflects the performance of the Company, including the above
accomplishments for the fiscal year. Highlights of the strong tie between pay
and performance include the following:
●
|
Annual Cash Incentive Payments
under the EICP
: Except for Mr. Hilton (who was entitled to a
guaranteed bonus for Fiscal 2016 as an inducement to join the Company),
none of our NEOs received an annual incentive payout under the EICP for
Fiscal 2016 due to the Companys failure to achieve 80% of its
Separation-adjusted Operating Income target for Fiscal 2016. However, in
order to recognize and reward their efforts and leadership in executing
the Separation and Merger
|
36
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
|
of CSRA in Fiscal 2016, the
Committee approved discretionary transaction success bonuses to certain
key executives, including Messrs. Lawrie, Saleh and Deckelman. See Fiscal
2016 Transaction Success Bonus, below.
|
●
|
PSU Vesting
: At the time
of the Separation, the performance periods with respect to the PSUs
granted in our 2014 fiscal year (Fiscal 2014 PSUs) and 2015 fiscal year
(Fiscal 2015 PSUs) were ended, and the EPS goals with respect to our
Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2015 PSUs were deemed to have been achieved at the
200% (maximum) and 100% (target) levels, respectively. 150% of the Fiscal
2014 PSUs (
i.e.
, the maximum 200% less the 50% that had previously been
earned and vested based on our EPS performance for our 2014 and 2015
fiscal years) were earned and vested at the time of the Separation. Of the
75% of the Fiscal 2015 PSUs that were deemed to have been earned at the
time of the Separation (
i.e.
, the target 100% less the
25% that had previously been earned and vested based on our EPS
performance for our 2015 fiscal year), 45% of the Fiscal 2015 PSUs were
vested at the time of the Separation and the remaining 30% were converted
into service-based RSUs that vest in two equal 15% halves at the end of
Fiscal 2016 and our 2017 fiscal year, subject to each holders continued
employment. Based on the Fiscal 2016 diluted non-GAAP Earnings Per Share
from continuing operations of $2.57*, 25% of the Fiscal 2016 target PSUs
vested after the end of Fiscal 2016. See Long-Term Incentive Compensation
- Performance Share Units and Effect of Separation on Outstanding Equity
Awards below for details.
|
●
|
Fiscal 2015 CEO Performance
Award Vested
: In July 2014, we awarded Mr. Lawrie a special PSU award
subject to one-year cliff vesting based on achievement of certain
financial, governance and organizational goals and Mr. Lawries continued
employment. In July 2015, the Compensation Committee determined that Mr.
Lawrie had achieved the goals and the award was vested at 100%. See
Vesting of 2015 CEO Performance Award, below for
details.
|
____________________
*
|
Represents Earnings Per Share
from continuing operations for Fiscal 2016 determined in accordance with
GAAP of $0.50, excluding $(0.38) from certain CSRA overhead costs, $0.16
of U.S. Pension & OPEB impacts related to our separation from CSRA,
$(0.85) of separation, restructuring & other transaction costs,
$(0.57) of pension & OPEB actuarial & settlement losses, $(0.02)
of SEC settlement-related items, $(0.42) in debt extinguishment costs, and
$0.03 of tax valuation allowance impacts.
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
37
|
Table of Contents
Fiscal 2016 Direct
Compensation
|
Total Direct
Compensation
The following chart summarizes the
characteristics and primary purpose of each element of our executive
compensation program. The first three of these elements comprise Total Direct
Compensation.
Compensation Element
|
|
Characteristics
|
|
Primary Purpose
|
Base Salary
|
|
Annual fixed cash
compensation.
|
|
Provide a fixed amount of cash
compensation based on individual performance, experience, skills,
responsibilities and competitive pay levels.
|
Annual Cash
Incentives
|
|
Annual variable cash compensation
determined by Company financial performance, attainment of strategic
objectives, and individual performance.
|
|
Motivate and reward the
achievement of annual financial and other operating objectives and
individual performance that drive stockholder value over
time.
|
Long-Term
Incentives
|
|
Long-term equity awards generally
granted annually as a combination of stock options and Performance Share
Units.
|
|
Motivate and reward profitable
growth and increase in share price over time and align with stockholders.
Align pay with CSCs performance over multi-year overlapping performance
cycles.
|
Post-Employment Benefits
|
|
Retirement and deferred
compensation plans and career equity awards.
|
|
Offer competitive retirement
compensation designed to attract and retain mid- and late-career senior
executives.
|
Severance/Change-in-Control
|
|
Contingent short-term
compensation.
|
|
Provide assurance of short-term
compensation continuity to allow executives to remain focused on
stockholder interests in a dynamic environment.
|
Perquisites and
Benefits
|
|
Limited perquisites and health
and welfare benefits.
|
|
Provide business-related benefits
consistent with competitive practice to enhance executive work
efficiency.
|
The Committee makes decisions regarding
each element of Total Direct Compensation. Because our focus is on performance,
the Committee does not consider aggregate amounts earned or benefits accumulated
by an executive from prior service with the Company as a significant factor in
making compensation decisions. To assess the competitiveness of the Total Direct
Compensation opportunity and each of its components (base salary, annual cash
incentives, and long-term incentives) for our CEO and other NEOs, these
components are compared to the market median for similarly situated executives
in companies against which we compete for executive talent. Please see
Compensation Framework Review of Market Compensation Data below for a
discussion of our peer group and other data used to assess the competitive
market.
The market competitiveness of our pay
opportunities is just one factor that the Committee reviews in evaluating our
executive compensation programs. Additional factors may include the Companys
performance (including its transformation strategy and management performance in
executing that strategy) and individual factors such as an employees level of
responsibility, experience, succession prospects and individual
performance.
38
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Mr. Lawries Employment
Agreement
. Mr. Lawrie joined CSC in March
2012, and his annual compensation opportunity is governed by his employment
agreement. Pursuant to the employment agreement, we agreed to employ Mr. Lawrie
as our President and Chief Executive Officer through March 31, 2017 at a minimum
annual base salary of $1,250,000 and an annual bonus with a target opportunity
of 150% of base salary and a maximum amount of 300% of base salary. In respect
of each fiscal year which commences during the term of his employment agreement,
Mr. Lawrie also will receive time-vesting stock options with an aggregate value
equal to 280% of base salary and performance share units with an aggregate value
of 420% of base salary, in each case on terms and conditions that are generally
consistent with those applicable to awards granted to other senior executive
officers of the Company. The employment agreement also provides for severance
benefits described below. Finally, Mr. Lawrie generally is eligible to
participate in the Companys employee benefits plans on the same basis as all
other executives. Mr. Lawrie reports directly to the Board of Directors, and his
salary and target incentive are subject to annual review and increase by the
Board.
Base Salary
General
. Base salary is the only fixed component of our NEOs compensation and
constitutes a small percentage of Total Direct Compensation. Base salary is
determined by the level of responsibility assumed by an executive, experience,
performance and competitive pay practices. Base salary adjustment decisions also
consider promotions, changes in responsibilities, performance, succession
prospects, Company merit pay budgets and market trends. At the beginning of each
fiscal year, the Committee reviews the base salary for each NEO and determines
base salary adjustments, if any. The Committee considers how base salary
adjustments affect annual cash incentive opportunities and long-term incentive
grant values, as both are defined as a percentage of base salary.
Fiscal 2016
Compensation
. For Fiscal 2016, the Committee
maintained the same base salaries as in effect during Fiscal 2015 for Messrs.
Lawrie, Saleh, Deckelman and Smith and increased Mr. Zolets base salary by
4.6%, from $621,500 to $650,000, reflecting his NPS and Americas Region
performance. Mr. Hilton was hired toward the end of Fiscal 2015 and his base
salary for FY2016 was established when he was hired based on the factors
described above.
The following table presents the Fiscal
2016 annualized and actual base salaries for each of our NEOs and the percentage
the actual base salary represents in Target Total Direct
Compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Annualized
|
|
Actual
|
|
of
Target
|
Named
Executive
|
|
Fiscal
2016
|
|
Fiscal
2016
|
|
Total
Direct
|
Officer
|
|
Base Salary ($)
|
|
Base Salary ($)
|
|
Compensation
|
J.
Michael Lawrie
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
11%
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
700,000
|
|
700,000
|
|
17%
|
William J. Deckelman, Jr.
|
|
539,700
|
|
539,700
|
|
22%
|
Stephen J. Hilton
|
|
650,000
|
|
650,000
|
|
14%
|
James R. Smith
|
|
650,000
|
|
650,000
|
|
21%
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
650,000
|
|
643,423
|
|
20%
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
39
|
Table of Contents
Annual Incentive Compensation
Plan
The EICP is an annual cash bonus plan,
which is designed to take into account a variety of factors, including Company
financial performance, the performance of an NEOs business unit, the NEOs
contribution to the achievement of the Companys strategic objectives, the NEOs
individual performance and client satisfaction. Awards under the EICP therefore
are directly linked to Company and individual performance.
Target EICP Awards
. The Committee establishes a target award percentage for each
NEO, representing a percentage of base salary, and an associated target award
value. Each NEOs target award value is established in consideration of market
practices, individual scope of responsibility and expected contribution. The
table below reflects the Fiscal 2016 target award percentage, the corresponding
target award value, and the target award value as a percentage of target Total
Direct Compensation. For Fiscal 2016, the Committee maintained the same target
award opportunities (as a percentage of base salary) as in Fiscal 2015 for
Messrs. Lawrie, Saleh, Deckelman, Smith and Zolet. Mr. Hilton was hired toward
the end of Fiscal 2015 and his target award opportunity for Fiscal 2016 was
established when he was hired based on the factors described above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of
|
Named
Executive
|
|
Target
EICP
|
|
Target
EICP
|
|
Target Total
Direct
|
Officer
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Value ($)
|
|
Compensation
|
J.
Michael Lawrie
|
|
150%
|
|
1,875,000
|
|
16%
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
100%
|
|
700,000
|
|
17%
|
William J. Deckelman, Jr.
|
|
100%
|
|
539,700
|
|
22%
|
Stephen J. Hilton
|
|
100%
|
|
650,000
|
|
14%
|
James R. Smith
|
|
100%
|
|
650,000
|
|
21%
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
100%
|
|
650,000
|
|
20%
|
How the EICP Works
. EICP awards are earned based on performance relative to
targeted financial (Operating Income, Cash Flow and Revenue) goals, weighted
60%; strategic objectives, weighted 20%; and customer satisfaction objectives,
weighted 20%, and are subject to further discretionary modification for
individual performance. The Committee has given prominent weight to client
satisfaction as a performance measure to help foster a client-focused,
metric-driven culture within the Company.
In order to emphasize profitability,
the Company must achieve at least 80% of its Operating Income (OI) goal before
any EICP payments are made. In addition, assuming this threshold level is
achieved, the percentage achievement of the OI goal also serves as a multiplier
or funding factor which is applied to the percentage achievement of the EICP
financial metrics as a whole to determine the overall score for the financial
metrics portion of the EICP, up to a maximum of 200%.
Weighted financial metric performance
(as adjusted by the OI funding factor), plus weighted strategic metric
performance, plus weighted customer satisfaction metric performance determine
the initial payout score, which is then adjusted for individual performance and
multiplied by an NEOs target award to reach the final EICP payout
amount.
Special rules apply for executives who
are subject to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 162(m)).
If the Company achieves 80% of its OI goal for the year, each executive subject
to Section 162(m) becomes eligible to receive the maximum possible EICP payout.
However, to ensure the EICP operates the same way for all executives, the
Committee then exercises negative discretion to reduce the executives EICP
payment based on actual performance with respect to the financial and other
metrics described in this section.
40
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Fiscal 2016 Financial
Metrics
. All NEOs are measured against
corporate financial performance. Management recommends specific targets for
financial measures, which are reviewed by the Committee. The Board provides
final approval (subject to certain adjustments). The table below describes the
corporate financial measures, weightings and goals used in determining the
Fiscal 2016 EICP awards for the NEOs, prior to adjustment for the Separation.
For each of the pre-adjustment financial measures, the Fiscal 2016 goals
represented an increase over Fiscal 2015 actual results as shown in the
table.
|
|
|
|
Pre-Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2016
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
Fiscal
2015
|
Measures
|
|
|
|
Targets
|
|
Results
|
(Weightings)
|
|
Purpose
|
|
(millions)
|
|
(millions)**
|
Revenue (30%)
|
|
Primary measure of growth which requires expansion of current
business, capture of new business and conversion into a revenue
stream.
|
|
$
|
12,731
|
|
$
|
12,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Income* (40%)
|
|
Key component of profitability that
reflects revenue growth, investments, cost takeout and operational
efficiencies.
|
|
$
|
1,406
|
|
$
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free Cash
Flow (30%)
|
|
Key
component of Company valuation reflecting liquidity, profitability,
improved working capital management and capital efficiency.
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
$
|
717
|
*
|
Operating Income must be at least 80% of target for any
NEO to receive any EICP payment.
|
|
**
|
Fiscal 2015 Revenue results represent Fiscal 2015
revenue calculated in accordance with GAAP as reported in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2015, adjusted for differences in currency
exchange rates used to calculate the target. Fiscal 2015 Operating Income
is defined as revenue less cost of services, depreciation and amortization
expense and segment G&A expense, excluding corporate G&A, adjusted
for special items (including proposed SEC settlement costs, a fourth
quarter valuation allowance release, a fourth quarter special
restructuring expense, and mark-to-market year-end revaluations) and
differences in currency exchange rates used to calculate the target.
Fiscal 2015 Free Cash Flow is defined as the sum of operating cash flow,
investing cash flow (excluding business acquisitions, dispositions and
investments (including short-term investments and purchase or sale of
available for sale securities)) and payments on capital leases and other
long term asset financings. All numbers are prior to adjustment for the
Separation.
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2015 Proxy
Statement
|
|
41
|
Table of Contents
Financial Metric Performance
Scale
. For Fiscal 2016, the Committee
established the following scale of payout percentages to assess performance
against the financial goals described above, including for purposes of
determining the OI funding factor applicable to the financial metrics. This
scale applies to all NEOs, with a threshold 50% payout level for achievement at
80% of target extending to a maximum 200% payout level for achievement at or
above 135% of target.
Fiscal 2016 EICP
Payout Scale on Financial Achievement
% of OI
Goal
Financial Metrics-Separation-Related
Adjustments
. In connection with the
Separation, the Committee adjusted the financial metric targets for the Fiscal
2016 EICP to take into account the impact of the Separation of the Companys US
public sector business on our projected revenue, OI and free cash flow for
Fiscal 2016. The revised Fiscal 2016 financial metric targets after adjusting
for the effect of the Separation are as follows:
Financial
Measures
|
|
Adjusted
Fiscal 2016
|
(Weightings)
|
|
Financial Targets
(millions)
|
Revenue (30%)
|
|
$
|
8,573
|
Operating Income (40%)
|
|
$
|
709
|
Free Cash Flow
(30%)
|
|
$
|
400
|
Fiscal 2016 Strategic and Customer
Satisfaction Metrics
. Management also
recommends a set of strategic objectives for review by the Committee and
approval by the Board. These objectives are intended to emphasize critical
components of the Companys transformation strategy, including a cost takeout
program, rationalizing the business around certain core segments, improving
operating margins, improving cash flow, improving profitability, advancing the
Companys strategy to provide next gen services through leveraging CSCs
capabilities with strategic partners, completing strategic acquisitions,
enhancing the skill sets of employees through new leadership and training,
returning cash to stockholders and improving client satisfaction.
42
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of
Contents
For the customer satisfaction metric,
the Committee generally establishes the customer responses to its prior year
survey as a baseline, and sets improvement goals over that baseline for the
Company as a whole and for specific business units and regions. We use the Net
Promoter Score (NetPS) system to evaluate customer satisfaction. No payouts of
the customer satisfaction component are made unless at least 50% of our
solicited customers respond to the survey.
Annual Incentive Compensation Plan:
Fiscal 2016 Results
Company Financial
Performance
. At the end of Fiscal 2016, the
Committee reviewed the Companys financial performance against the applicable
performance measures and determined that the Company failed to achieve at least
80% of the Separation-adjusted Fiscal 2016 OI target. As a result, none of the
NEOs were entitled to receive an EICP payment for Fiscal 2016.
Fiscal 2016 Transaction Success
Bonus
In spite of the Companys failure to
achieve 80% of the Separation-adjusted OI target for Fiscal 2016, the Committee,
recognizing the tremendous efforts and leadership demonstrated by our executive
team in successfully accomplishing the Separation and Merger of CSRA in Fiscal
2016, decided to grant discretionary transaction success bonuses to certain key
executives. The Separation and Merger represented an extremely large and complex
undertaking in a relatively short-time frame of roughly six months from
announcement to completion, splitting a global entity with over $12 billion in
annual revenues and over 70,000 employees in 60 different countries (as of
fiscal 2015 year-end) into two independent, publicly traded pure-play market
leaders. The Separation and Merger were completed on-time and without
substantial disruptions to customers, partners, or employees. Behind the scenes,
our employees worked tirelessly to establish the new legal, financial, IT and
governance systems and infrastructure necessary to make the Separation and
Merger a success. In light of their support and leadership in successfully
completing the Separation and Merger, the Committee approved discretionary
transaction success bonuses to certain key executives, including (among the
NEOs) to Messrs. Lawrie, Saleh and Deckelman in the amounts of $2,250,000,
$770,000 and $300,000, respectively.
In addition, Mr. Hilton was entitled to
a guaranteed bonus for Fiscal 2016 in the amount of 50% of his Fiscal 2016 EICP
target bonus, or $325,000, pursuant to the terms of his offer letter. Although
the Company does not typically guarantee bonuses to newly hired executives, the
Committee felt it necessary to make an exception in Mr. Hiltons case in order
to attract him to the Company. Although initially contemplated as a cash award,
the Committee decided to pay half of the guaranteed bonus in cash and half in
the form of service-based RSUs that vest on the first anniversary of the grant
date, to align with the terms of the Fiscal 2017 retention awards granted to
certain other executives, including Messrs. Smith and Zolet as described under
Fiscal 2017 Retention Awards below.
Long-Term Incentive
Compensation
General
. Long-term incentive (LTI) compensation is the largest component of
executive compensation for our NEOs. For Fiscal 2016, our regular cycle LTI
awards continued to consist of grants of service-vested stock options (Stock
Options), weighted 40%, and PSUs with a three-year performance cycle, weighted
60%.
At the beginning of each fiscal year,
the Committee establishes a target LTI grant value for each NEO, expressed as a
percentage of base salary, and the relative mix of award types. Individual
target LTI grant values are determined in light of market practices, and actual
award levels reflect individual performance and succession considerations. The
Committee follows a similar process for new executives who join the Company
during the fiscal year.
Fiscal 2016 LTI Target
Percentage
. The following table presents the
Fiscal 2016 target LTI grant values for our regular-cycle LTI awards, the target
LTI percentage and long-term incentives as a percentage of target total direct
compensation. The LTI target opportunities for Messrs. Lawrie, Saleh and
Deckelman were the
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
43
|
Table of
Contents
same in Fiscal 2016 as in Fiscal 2015.
The Fiscal 2016 LTI target opportunity for Mr. Zolet was increased from 250% to
300% of base salary reflecting his NPS and Americas Region performance. Mr.
Smiths normal LTI target opportunity is 300% of base salary; however, his
actual LTI target opportunity for Fiscal 2016 was reduced to 275% of base
salary, reflecting the Committees assessment of his performance. Mr. Hilton was
hired toward the end of Fiscal 2015 and his normal LTI target opportunity for
Fiscal 2016 of 300% of base salary was established when he was hired based on
the factors described above. In addition, Mr. Hilton was granted a one-time
addition to his Fiscal 2016 LTI award opportunity of 225% of base salary, for a
total combined LTI award opportunity for Fiscal 2016 of 525% of base salary, as
an inducement to accept employment with us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of
|
|
|
Annualized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
Total
|
Named
Executive
|
|
Base
|
|
Target LTI
|
|
|
Target LTI
|
|
Direct
|
Officer
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Value ($)
|
|
Compensation
|
J. Michael Lawrie
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
700%
|
|
|
8,750,000
|
|
74%
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
700,000
|
|
400%
|
|
|
2,800,000
|
|
67%
|
William J. Deckelman, Jr.
|
|
539,700
|
|
250%
|
|
|
1,349,250
|
|
56%
|
Stephen J. Hilton
|
|
650,000
|
|
525%
|
*
|
|
3,412,500
|
|
72%
|
James R. Smith
|
|
650,000
|
|
275%
|
|
|
1,787,500
|
|
58%
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
650,000
|
|
300%
|
|
|
1,950,000
|
|
60%
|
____________________
*
|
|
Includes a one-time addition to
Mr. Hiltons Fiscal 2016 LTI award opportunity of 225% of base salary, on
top of his normal award opportunity of 300% of base salary, as an
inducement to accept employment with us.
|
Stock Options
. Stock Options (comprising 40% of each NEOs target LTI
award) provide value to executives only if the market value of our common stock
appreciates over time. The exercise price for each Stock Option is the closing
price of our common stock on the grant date. One-third of the Stock Options vest
and become exercisable on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant
date.
Performance Share
Units
. PSUs (comprising 60% of each NEOs
target LTI award) provide an opportunity for our executives to earn common stock
if targeted performance goals are met over a three-year performance period.
Performance is measured based on the Companys EPS. The Committee believes that
EPS, aside from being a key measure of stockholder value, serves as the best
measure of performance and profitability in light of the Companys multi-year
transformation strategy.
For each award, EPS performance is
measured over the last year in the three-year performance period. The Committee
establishes threshold, target and maximum EPS goals, at which 50%, 100% and
200%, respectively, of the target PSUs may vest. Vesting is interpolated for EPS
performance between these goals. No PSUs vest if EPS performance is below the
threshold goal.
In addition, each award also provides
an opportunity for accelerated vesting based on EPS performance in the first and
second years of the performance period, in order to recruit, retain and motivate
progress toward multiyear transformation goals. 25% of the target PSUs may vest
at the end of the first year of the performance period if our EPS for that year
equals or exceeds the threshold EPS goal for the award. In addition, 25% of the
target PSUs may vest at the end of the second year of the performance period if
our EPS for that year equals or exceeds the threshold EPS goal (if not achieved
after year one) or if our EPS performance for the second year equals or exceeds
the EPS goal at which 75% of the target PSUs vest (if partial vesting occurred
after year one). Up to 200% of the target PSUs, less any PSUs which vested in
years one or two, may vest at the end of the third year of the performance
period, subject to our EPS performance for that year.
44
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of
Contents
Fiscal 2016 PSUs
. Each NEO was granted a target number of Fiscal 2016 PSUs as
set forth in the Fiscal 2016 Regular-Cycle Long-Term Incentive Awards table
below. Between 0% and 200% of the target Fiscal 2016 PSUs will vest at the end
of Fiscal 2018 based on our EPS performance for Fiscal 2018. The threshold EPS
goal (at which 50%, and below which 0%, of the target Fiscal 2016 PSUs will
vest) was set by the Committee at $5.15 prior to the Separation. To reflect the
effects of the Separation, the Committee subsequently adjusted the threshold EPS
goal for the Fiscal 2016 PSUs to $2.50 per share, subject to further adjustment
to omit the effects of extraordinary items, gain or loss on the disposal of a
business segment, and unusual or infrequently occurring events or
transactions.
The Fiscal 2016 PSUs also provide an
opportunity for partial vesting in years one and two of the performance period,
as described above. One-quarter of the target PSUs vested at the end of Fiscal
2016 because our Fiscal 2016 non-GAAP EPS of $2.57* exceeded the
Separation-adjusted EPS threshold goal of $2.50. If our EPS in Fiscal 2017
equals or exceeds the EPS goal at which 75% of the target PSUs may vest, an
additional 25% of the target PSUs will vest at the end of Fiscal 2017. Up to
200% of the target PSUs, less any PSUs which received accelerated vesting for
Fiscal 2016 or Fiscal 2017, will vest at the end of Fiscal 2018, subject to EPS
performance for Fiscal 2018.
____________________
*
|
|
Represents Earnings Per Share
from continuing operations for Fiscal 2016 determined in accordance with
GAAP of $0.50, excluding $(0.38) from certain CSRA overhead costs, $0.16
of U.S. Pension & OPEB impacts related to our separation from CSRA,
$(0.85) of separation, restructuring & other transaction costs,
$(0.57) of pension & OPEB actuarial & settlement losses, $(0.02)
of SEC settlement-related items, $(0.42) in debt extinguishment costs, and
$0.03 of tax valuation allowance impacts.
|
Fiscal 2016 Long-Term Incentive
Awards
. The target award value and the number
of shares granted for each element of our regular-cycle LTI compensation for
Fiscal 2016 is set forth in the table below.
Fiscal 2016 Regular-Cycle Long-Term
Incentive Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Share Units
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Target
|
|
Stock
|
|
Target
|
|
Target Share
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
Award Value
|
|
Options
|
|
Award
|
|
Units
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
Incentives ($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
Value ($)
|
|
(#)
|
J. Michael
Lawrie
|
|
8,750,000
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
170,051
|
|
5,250,000
|
|
78,687
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
2,800,000
|
|
1,120,000
|
|
54,416
|
|
1,680,000
|
|
25,180
|
William J. Deckelman,
Jr.
|
|
1,349,250
|
|
539,700
|
|
26,622
|
|
809,550
|
|
12,134
|
Stephen J. Hilton
|
|
3,412,500
|
|
1,365,000
|
|
66,320
|
|
2,047,500
|
|
30,688
|
James R. Smith
|
|
1,787,500
|
|
715,000
|
|
34,739
|
|
1,072,500
|
|
16,075
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
1,950,000
|
|
780,000
|
|
37,897
|
|
1,170,000
|
|
17,536
|
In accordance with CSCs Equity Grant
Policy, the target award values listed in the table above generally differ from
the award values listed in the Summary Compensation Table. In order to determine
the number of stock options to award, the target grant value for options is
divided by the fair market value of an option determined by using the average
closing price of CSC stock for the three-month period ending on the grant date
and the Black Scholes option pricing model. The number of shares underlying our
PSUs is also calculated by dividing the target grant value by the average
closing price of CSC stock for the three-month period ending on the grant date.
This method is employed to reduce the impact of stock price spikes, either
positive or negative, when determining the number of shares underlying these
awards. In contrast, the grant
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
45
|
Table of
Contents
values in the Summary Compensation
Table are determined using the grant date closing price, and the grant values
for the PSUs in the Summary Compensation Table are based on the probable
achievement of the performance goals at the time of grant, instead of
target.
Fiscal 2016 Target Total Direct
Compensation
The chart below displays the value of
each element of target Total Direct Compensation described above for our NEOs.
As noted above in the discussion of each element of compensation, the value of
compensation actually realized will vary from the Committees targets based on
our financial results and our stock price performance.
|
|
|
|
Target
Annual
|
|
Target
Regular-
|
|
|
Named
Executive
|
|
Base
Salary
|
|
Cash
Incentives
|
|
Cycle LTI
Grant
|
|
Target Total
Direct
|
Officer
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Value ($)
|
|
Compensation ($)
|
J. Michael Lawrie
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
1,875,000
|
|
8,750,000
|
|
11,875,000
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
700,000
|
|
700,000
|
|
2,800,000
|
|
4,200,000
|
William J. Deckelman, Jr.
|
|
539,700
|
|
539,700
|
|
1,349,250
|
|
2,428,650
|
Stephen J. Hilton
|
|
650,000
|
|
650,000
|
|
3,412,500
|
|
4,712,500
|
James R. Smith
|
|
650,000
|
|
650,000
|
|
1,787,500
|
|
3,087,500
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
650,000
|
|
650,000
|
|
1,950,000
|
|
3,250,000
|
Fiscal 2016 Performance-Based
Retention Awards
In recognition of senior managements
successful leadership in executing the Separation and Merger and as a further
incentive to continue the next phase of the Companys transformation, in
December 2015 the Company granted each of the NEOs performance-based retention
awards in the form of PSUs, in addition to the regular-cycle LTI awards
discussed above. The target grant values and target number of PSUs granted
pursuant to the awards are set forth in the table below:
|
|
Target
Award
|
|
Target
Number
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
Value ($)
|
|
of PSUs* (#)
|
J. Michael Lawrie
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
338,869
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
3,500,000
|
|
118,604
|
William J. Deckelman, Jr.
|
|
1,619,000
|
|
54,866
|
Stephen J. Hilton
|
|
2,600,000
|
|
88,106
|
James R. Smith
|
|
2,600,000
|
|
88,106
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
44,053
|
____________________
*
|
|
Determined in accordance with our Equity Grant Policy,
which was modified in connection with the Separation to normalize the
effect of using a combination of pre-Separation and post-Separation stock
prices for purposes of determining the average three-month closing stock
price for the period ending on the grant
date.
|
46
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of
Contents
Mr. Lawries PSU award vests subject to
the achievement of certain financial and organizational performance goals. 37.5%
of the award is tied to financial goals (the Financial Component). Between 0%
and 100% of the Financial Component will vest on December 15, 2018 subject to
Mr. Lawries continued employment and our EPS performance for Fiscal 2018. 50%
of the Financial Component will be eligible to vest if our EPS for Fiscal 2018
equals or exceeds the same Separation-adjusted EPS threshold of $2.50 applicable
to our regular-cycle Fiscal 2016 PSU grants (EPS Threshold). The Financial
Component will be eligible to vest up to a maximum of 100% if our Fiscal 2018
EPS equals or exceeds the same target EPS goal applicable to our regular-cycle
Fiscal 2016 PSU grants (EPS Target). Vesting is interpolated within this range
and no portion of the Financial Component will vest if we do not achieve at
least the EPS Threshold in Fiscal 2018.
The remaining 62.5% of Mr. Lawries
award (the Organizational Health Component) vests subject to the achievement
of both an EPS hurdle for our 2017 fiscal year (Fiscal 2017) and the Boards
assessment of our organizational health for the period ending March 31, 2017.
The Fiscal 2017 EPS hurdle is equal to 60% of our target EPS goal. The Board
will assess our organizational health based on such factors as (but not limited
to) management succession, enterprise risk and competitive positioning. If the
Fiscal 2017 EPS hurdle is met and the Board determines that vesting should occur
based on its assessment of our organizational health, then 50% of the
Organizational Health Component will vest on or about March 31, 2017, 25% on
September 30, 2017 and the remaining 25% on March 31, 2018, subject to Mr.
Lawries continued employment.
Up to 100% of the awards for Messrs.
Saleh, Deckelman, Hilton, Smith and Zolet will vest on December 15, 2018 subject
to each executives continued employment and the achievement of the same EPS
goals that apply to the Financial Component of Mr. Lawries award. In addition,
Mr. Saleh is eligible for earlier vesting in a portion of his award. Mr. Saleh
is eligible to vest in one-third of his award on December 15, 2016 if our EPS
achievement for Fiscal 2016 equals or exceeds the EPS Threshold. As discussed
above under Fiscal 2016 PSUs, our EPS for Fiscal 2016 exceeded the EPS
Threshold, meaning that Mr. Saleh will be eligible for early vesting of 33% of
his award on December 15, 2016, subject to his continued employment. In
addition, one-third of his award may vest on December 15, 2017 if our EPS for
Fiscal 2017 equals or exceeds the EPS goal at which 75% of the regular cycle
Fiscal 2016 PSU awards vest. Any portion of Mr. Salehs award that vests early
will reduce the amount of his award that may vest on December 15, 2018 based on
EPS performance for Fiscal 2018 as described above. Any portion of Mr. Salehs
award that vests early will not be paid until the earlier of December 15, 2018
or Mr. Salehs separation from service.
Vesting of 2015 CEO Performance
Award
In recognition of Mr. Lawries
successful leadership in executing the Companys transformation strategy and as
a further incentive to continue that process, on July 15, 2014, Mr. Lawrie
received a special PSU award with an intended grant-date value of $2,500,000.
Based on our Equity Grant Policy, this translated into an award of 40,368 PSUs.
Up to 100% of the award could vest and be converted into shares of our common
stock on the first anniversary of the grant date if certain financial,
governance and organizational performance goals were met, subject to Mr.
Lawries continued employment.
The financial goal was achievement of
at least 80% of our corporate OI goal for Fiscal 2015, which was met as
discussed in our annual proxy statement last year. The governance and
organizational goals required demonstrated progress in achieving best-in-class
board governance and engagement, leadership preparedness and stability
objectives. The Committee evaluated achievement of the governance and
organizational goals in July 2015 and determined that 100% of the PSUs should
vest.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
47
|
Table of
Contents
Effect of Separation on Outstanding
Equity Awards
In connection with the Separation,
outstanding employee equity awards (including awards held by our NEOs) were
adjusted as follows:
●
|
Adjustment of
Options
: Outstanding stock options
(vested or unvested) granted prior to Fiscal 2016 were converted using the
basket method into both options to purchase shares of
CSRA
Inc. (CSRA) and adjusted Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC)
options. Any unvested, outstanding CSC options granted in our 2014 fiscal
year (Fiscal 2014) became 100% vested immediately following the
effective time of the Separation. Outstanding CSC options granted in
Fiscal 2015 became 2/3 vested immediately following the Separation and the
remaining 1/3 of the resulting CSC and CSRA options vest in equal tranches
in May 2016 and May 2017, or in accordance with the current vesting
schedule for such options if the Committee so provides. Outstanding
options (vested or unvested) granted in Fiscal 2016 were converted using
the concentration method into CSRA options for individuals who became
CSRA employees in connection with the Separation and into adjusted CSC
options for individuals who did not become CSRA employees in connection
with the Separation, and in each case retain the same vesting schedule
they had before the Separation.
|
●
|
Adjustment of Time-Based
RSUs
: Outstanding restricted stock
units (other than PSUs) were converted using the basket method into both
CSRA restricted stock units and adjusted CSC restricted stock units, and
in each case retain the same vesting schedule they had before the
Separation.
|
●
|
Adjustment of
PSUs
: Outstanding PSUs granted in
Fiscal 2014 were deemed to have been earned at the maximum 200% of the
target level, and 150% of the target award (i.e., the maximum 200% minus
the 50% that previously vested after the end of Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal
2015) vested at the time of the Separation. Outstanding PSUs granted in
Fiscal 2015 were deemed to have been earned at 100% of the target level,
with 45% of the target award vested at the time of the Separation and the
remaining 30% of the target award (i.e., 100% minus the 25% that
previously vested after the end of Fiscal 2015 and the 45% that vested at
the time of the Separation) converted using the basket method into both
time-vesting CSRA RSUs and time-vesting CSC RSUs, vesting in each case in
equal tranches in May 2016 and May 2017, subject to their terms.
Outstanding PSUs granted in Fiscal 2016 were converted using the
concentration method into CSRA PSUs for individuals who became employees
of CSRA in connection with the Separation and into adjusted CSC PSUs for
individuals who did not become CSRA employees in connection with the
Separation, in each case retaining the same vesting terms they had before
the Separation but with adjusted performance goals to reflect the
Separation. The Separation-adjusted threshold performance goal for the CSC
Fiscal 2016 PSUs is discussed above in Fiscal 2016
PSUs.
|
48
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of
Contents
The table below illustrates the effect
of the Separation-related adjustments on the performance cycles for the Fiscal
2014, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2016 PSU awards:
|
|
Performance
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
Fiscal
|
Award
|
|
Period
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
Fiscal 2014
PSUs
|
|
4/2013-
3/2016
|
|
25%
vested
|
|
25%
vested
|
|
150% vested
upon
Separation
(200% less
Fiscal 2014 and
Fiscal 2015
vested
amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2015
PSUs
|
|
4/2014-
3/2017
|
|
|
|
25%
vested
|
|
45% vested
upon Separation
|
|
15% converted
to time-based
RSUs vesting in
May
2016
|
|
15% converted
to time-based
RSUs vesting in
May
2017
|
|
Fiscal 2016
PSUs
|
|
4/2015-
3/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
25% vested
|
|
Up to 25%
|
|
Up to 200%,
less Fiscal
2015
and Fiscal 2016
vested
amounts
|
Compensation Decisions After the End
of Fiscal 2016
Fiscal 2017 Retention
Awards
. In May 2016, after the end of Fiscal
2016, the Committee approved retention awards to Messrs. Smith and Zolet in the
amounts of $200,000 and $150,000, respectively. Although the awards were granted
in Fiscal 2017 and do not relate to Fiscal 2016 performance, they are discussed
here because the Committee considered the fact that the executives did not
receive an EICP payment for Fiscal 2016 in making the decision to grant the
awards and in determining the amount of each award. Half of each retention award
was paid in cash, subject to a clawback if the executive resigns or is
terminated for cause within one year after the grant date, and the remaining
half was paid in the form of RSUs vesting on the first anniversary of the grant
date. Because these awards were granted in Fiscal 2017, they are not presented
in the Summary Compensation Table below or the tables that follow; however, they
will be presented in these tables in next years proxy statement if each
executive remains an NEO.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
49
|
Table of
Contents
Other Executive
Compensation
|
Post-Employment
Benefits
Retirement Plans
. The Committee views retirement benefits as an important
component of our executive compensation program. As such, we offer our
employees, including the NEOs, a retirement program that provides the
opportunity to accumulate retirement income. We periodically review our benefits
program against our peer group and aim for the program to be
competitive.
Retirement Plans
|
CSC Matched Asset Plan
(MAP)
|
|
Broad-based, qualified, defined
contribution 401(k) plan with company match on a portion of employee
contributions and directed investment alternatives.
|
Deferred
Compensation Plan
|
|
CSC maintains the CSC Deferred
Compensation Plan, which is offered to approximately 2,000 U.S. executives
annually. This unfunded plan allows participants to defer receipt of
incentive compensation and salary. Additional details can be found under
Fiscal Year 2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
below.
|
Career Shares
. CSC grants Career Shares in the form of RSUs to a select,
limited number of key executives. The Committee believes that the Career Share
program has been a valuable compensation tool for attracting and retaining
mid-career executive talent. Once vested, delivery of shares commences at
retirement and is spread ratably in 10 annual installments following retirement,
thereby continuing to tie a portion of the executives post-retirement income to
share value and promoting long-term alignment with stockholder interests. The
Career Share program replaces the Companys Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan which was frozen in 2009.
At the beginning of Fiscal Year 2016,
each of the NEOs other than Mr. Hilton (who joined the Company mid-year)
received Career Share grants in an amount equal to 25% of their Fiscal 2015 base
salary and EICP payout for Fiscal 2015. Mr. Lawries and Mr. Salehs Career
Shares fully vest at age 62 (subject to continued employment), or at or after
age 55 with at least five years of continued employment. As a grandfathered
participant who entered the program prior to June 2012, Mr. Deckelmans Career
Shares fully vest upon him reaching age 65, or age 55 or older with at least 10
years of service. Since they each entered the program after June 2012, Mr.
Smiths and Mr. Zolets Career Shares provide for 50% vesting upon reaching age
55 with five years of service, and additional vesting in 10% increments for each
additional year of service beyond five years, with full vesting at age 62.
Severance and Change in Control
Compensation
In order to offer competitive total
compensation packages to our executive officers, as well as to ensure the
ongoing retention of these individuals, we offer certain post-employment
benefits to a select group of executive officers, including our NEOs. The
Severance Plan for Senior Management and Key Employees (the Severance Plan)
provides double trigger income and benefits continuity protection to the
executive for the limited case in which the employment of the executive officer
is terminated by the Company without cause or by the executive for good reason
during a specified window of time following a change in control. The Severance
Plan is intended to preserve executive productivity and encourage retention
during an actual or potential change in control of the Company. We believe the
importance of these benefits increases with the position and level of
responsibility of the executive.
50
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of
Contents
We also maintain an Executive Officer
Severance Policy (the Severance Policy) to provide severance benefits in the
discretion of the Compensation Committee and the CEO to certain executives whose
employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without cause in
situations not involving a change in control. The Severance Policy covers those
executives reporting directly to the CEO who are Section 16 officers. An
executive who resigns from the Company is not entitled to benefits under the
Severance Policy.
Mr. Lawrie does not participate in the
Severance Plan, nor is he covered under the Severance Policy. Instead, the
Company has entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Lawrie that provides
for certain severance payments. Additional details regarding the Severance Plan,
the Severance Policy and Mr. Lawries severance benefits under his employment
agreement are provided under Potential Payments Upon Change in Control and
Termination of Employment below.
The Company has entered into
non-compete agreements with each of our executive officers other than the CEO.
These agreements generally prohibit our executives from competing with CSC for
12 months following any termination of employment, prohibit our executives from
soliciting our employees or clients for 24 months following any termination of
employment, and contain a non-disclosure provision. We entered into these
agreements in an effort to protect vital Company interests. Mr. Lawrie is
subject to separate non-compete requirements under the terms of his employment
agreement.
Perquisites and Other
Benefits
Health Care Benefits
. We provide health care benefits to eligible employees,
including medical, dental, life, disability and accident insurance. These
benefits are available to all U.S. employees generally, including the NEOs.
These programs are designed to provide certain basic quality of life benefits
and protections.
Perquisites
. CSC provides certain limited perquisites to senior
executives, including the NEOs, in order to enhance their security and
productivity. The Committee reviews the perquisites provided to the NEOs
annually as part of its overall review of executive compensation. The Committee
has determined that it is reasonable and competitive to provide relocation
benefits to newly hired or relocated executives.
In addition, the CEO may use Company
owned or leased aircraft for personal purposes and, at times, is advised to use
such aircraft for security reasons even if for personal travel. The CEO is taxed
on the value of this usage according to IRS rules and no tax gross-up is
provided for personal usage of corporate aircraft. See the notes to the Summary
Compensation Table for more information regarding the perquisites provided to
the NEOs.
Role of Management
The CEO, with the assistance of the
Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO), conducts an annual review of the total
compensation of each executive officer, including the NEOs. The CEOs review
includes an assessment of each executive officers performance, the performance
of the individuals respective business or function, executive retention
considerations, succession potential and the competitive market. Following such
review, the CEO recommends base salaries and target annual and LTI opportunities
for the executive officers to the Committee.
Role of the Compensation
Committee
The Committee
is responsible for overseeing the
Companys compensation policies and programs. In fulfilling its
responsibilities, the Committee annually reviews general trends in executive
compensation, compensation design, and the total value and mix of compensation
for our executive officers. This process
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
51
|
Table of
Contents
includes the review and approval of the
target and actual Total Direct Compensation of each executive officer, taking
into consideration internal pay equity, tenure and performance of various
executive officers, potential future contributions, succession, and competitive
market information. Pursuant to its charter, the Committee may delegate any of
its responsibilities to a subcommittee or to Company employees or others. The
Committee has not delegated its authority for compensation for executive
officers. However, the Committee has delegated authority under CSCs equity
incentive plans to the CEO to grant equity awards to employees who are not
senior executives, subject to certain limits.
CEO Compensation
. The Committee works directly with its compensation
consultant to provide a decision-making framework for setting the CEOs target
Total Direct Compensation. The Committee establishes the goals and objectives
relevant to the CEOs compensation and makes a recommendation to the Board for
the CEOs compensation. The independent directors of the Board review the
Committees recommendations and determine the CEOs total compensation, within
the framework provided by Mr. Lawries employment agreement.
Role of Compensation
Consultant
To assist the Committee in discharging
its responsibilities, the Committee has directly retained PM&P as its
independent compensation consultant.
PM&P consults with the Committee on
executive compensation matters generally, including advising on trends and best
practices in the design, composition and policies of executive compensation
programs and providing commentary and advice on management proposals to the
Committee. Specifically, during Fiscal 2016, PM&P advised the Committee
on:
●
|
Pay practice trends
|
●
|
Proxy trends
|
●
|
CEO compensation
|
●
|
Non-employee director
compensation
|
●
|
Pay for performance
|
●
|
Selection of peer group
companies; and
|
●
|
Peer group pay comparisons
|
PM&P also attended most Committee
meetings at the request of the Committee Chair. Other than the work performed in
Fiscal 2016 for the Committee, PM&P did not provide any other services to
CSC or its executive officers. Based on this and other factors reviewed by the
Committee, the Committee has determined that the work performed by PM&P does
not raise any conflict of interest.
Review of Market Compensation
Data
CSC reviews market pay levels and
practices for NEOs using a combination of survey data and proxy disclosures on
pay for our peer group. The Committee reviews the peer group periodically and
identified the following companies as CSCs peer group for the purposes of
reviewing the competitiveness of compensation opportunities for the NEOs for
Fiscal 2016: Accenture, plc; Northrop Grumman Corp.; Raytheon Co.; Xerox Corp.;
EMC Corporation; L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.; Texas Instruments, Inc.;
Western Digital Corp.; Textron, Inc.; Automatic Data Processing, Inc.; Motorola
Solutions, Inc.; Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.; Hewlett-Packard Co.;
International Business Machines; Microsoft Corp.; Seagate Technology Plc;
Fidelity National Information Services and Teradata Corp. (collectively, the
Peer Group).
52
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of
Contents
The Committee considered several
factors in its choice of peers, including the market in which the Company
competes for executive talent, certain strategic aspects of the Companys
transformation strategy, and stockholder concerns. The Committee determined that
including significantly larger companies by revenue in the Peer Group was
appropriate given that we compete with these companies for executive talent, but
ensured that PM&P regressed the compensation data for these larger companies
to enhance its comparability. In August 2015, the Committee revised the Peer
Group in anticipation of the Separation to take into account the expected impact
of the Separation on our size and business. Starting with the existing Peer
Group, the Committee excluded any companies with greater than three times our
expected revenue size post-Separation, excluded any aerospace and defense
companies and added new companies based on company size, industry and financial
characteristics. The revised Peer Group of 13 is reflected in the following
table. CSC Fiscal 2016 revenue of $7.1 billion ranked near the median revenue of
$7.2 billion for the 13 peers.
Peer Group
|
|
|
Revenue
|
Company
Name
|
|
($ in billions)*
|
Accenture plc
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
CA, Inc.
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
EMC Corporation
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
NCR Corporation
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Symantec Corporation
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Teradata Corporation
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Unisys Corporation
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Western Digital Corporation
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
Xerox Corporation
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
____________________
|
*
|
|
Represents 12 months of
revenue through March 31, 2016 except for:
|
(1)
|
|
Accenture plc represents 12 months of revenue through
February 29, 2016
|
(2)
|
|
Motorola Solutions, Inc. represents 12 months of revenue
through April 2, 2016
|
(3)
|
|
Symantec Corporation represents 12 months of revenue
through April 1, 2016
|
(4)
|
|
Western Digital Corporation represents 12 months of
revenue through April 1, 2016
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
53
|
Table of
Contents
Additional Compensation
Policies
|
In addition to the components of our
executive compensation program, we maintain the compensation policies described
below.
Policy on Transactions in Company
Securities and Related Derivatives
The Board of Directors has adopted a
policy prohibiting directors, corporate officers and each employee of CSC or its
subsidiaries who are financial insiders, and members of their immediate
families, from entering into any transactions in CSCs securities except during
announced trading periods, or pursuant to a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 of
the Exchange Act. Such transactions are subject to pre-approval by the Companys
CEO, CFO, CHRO and General Counsel prior to entering any such transaction. In
addition, CSC prohibits directors, officers and financial insiders, and members
of their immediate families, from derivative security transactions with respect
to equity securities of CSC. CSC also discourages directors, officers and
financial insiders from margining or pledging CSC stock to secure a loan or
purchase shares of CSC stock on margin. None of the NEOs has margined or pledged
any CSC stock.
Equity Ownership
Guidelines
The Committee has adopted equity
ownership guidelines for senior level executives to encourage them to build
their ownership positions in our common stock over time and retain shares they
earn through our equity incentive plans. The Committee believes that stock
ownership by our executive officers further aligns their interests with those of
long-term stockholders. In order to mitigate any negative impact to an
executives compliance with the guidelines as a result of the change in our
stock price following the Separation, shares of CSRA stock owned by an executive
will count toward the ownership requirement as well, until such time as the
Committee deems appropriate. Under the equity ownership guidelines, each senior
level executive who has not yet achieved the equity ownership levels must retain
a certain percentage of the net shares (after withholding for taxes and exercise
price) resulting from stock option exercises, PSU payments or other Long-Term
Incentives until the levels are achieved. In order to encourage executives to
meet the guidelines more quickly, there are higher retention requirements the
farther an executive is from meeting the guidelines. Executives who have
satisfied 50% or less of their ownership guideline must retain 100% of their net
shares, executives who have satisfied between 51% and 75% of their ownership
guideline must retain 75% of their net shares, and executives who have satisfied
more than 75% of their ownership guidelines must retain 50% of their net
shares.
The ownership guidelines for our NEOs
are as follows:
|
|
Stock Value as
a
|
Position
|
|
Percentage of Base Salary
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
700%
|
Other Named Executive Officers
|
|
300%
|
The Committee reviews compliance with
the guidelines on an annual basis and considers the amount of common stock held
directly or through the Companys MAP, Career Shares and RSUs (but not PSUs) in
determining whether an executive has achieved his designated equity ownership
level.
54
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Tax Deductibility of
Compensation
Section 162(m) limits a companys
annual tax deduction for compensation to its CEO and its three other
highest-paid executive officers employed at year-end (other than the CFO) to $1
million per person, unless, among other things, the compensation is
performance-based, as defined in Section 162(m), and provided under a plan
that has been approved by the stockholders. It is our policy to design and
administer our compensation program in a tax efficient manner and the Committee
considers the impact of the deduction limitations imposed by Section 162(m) on
the Company. As noted above, compensation decisions are made, among other
things, to ensure market competitiveness, to reward outstanding performance, and
to attract proven talent. Sometimes this results in compensation amounts being
non-deductible under Section 162(m). For example, since the CEOs salary is
above the $1 million threshold, a portion of his salary and his perquisites are
not deductible by the Company.
Compensation Recoupment
Policy
CSC maintains a compensation recoupment
or clawback policy that permits the Company to recover performance-based
compensation from participants whose fraud or intentional illegal conduct
materially contributed to a financial restatement. The policy allows for the
recovery of the difference between compensation awarded or paid and the amount
which would have been paid had it been calculated based on the restated
financial statements, excluding any tax payments. In addition, under the
Companys equity grant agreements, employees may be required to forfeit awards
or gains if a recipient breaches the non-competition, non-solicitation of
employees, or non-disclosure provisions of such agreements.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
55
|
Table of Contents
Summary Compensation
Table
|
The following table provides
information on the compensation of the Named Executive Officers in the Fiscal
Years indicated.
Name & Principal
Position
1
(a)
|
|
Fiscal
Year
(b)
|
|
Salary
2
($)
(c)
|
|
Bonus
3
($)
(d)
|
|
Stock
Awards
4
($)
(e)
|
|
Option
Awards
5
($)
(f)
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
6
($)
(g)
|
|
Change in
Pension Value
and Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
7
($)
(h)
|
|
All Other
Compensation
8
($)
(i)
|
|
Total
($)
(j)
|
J. Michael
Lawrie
|
|
2016
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
2,250,000
|
|
16,461,437
|
|
3,577,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,203
|
|
23,823,731
|
Chairman, President
and
|
|
2015
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
8,614,596
|
|
3,262,979
|
|
1,875,000
|
|
|
|
451,305
|
|
15,453,880
|
Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
2014
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
5,929,207
|
|
3,582,098
|
|
2,182,500
|
|
|
|
323,390
|
|
13,267,195
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
2016
|
|
700,000
|
|
770,000
|
|
5,678,459
|
|
1,144,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,577
|
|
8,299,698
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
2015
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
2,041,916
|
|
1,044,151
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
6,325
|
|
4,492,392
|
and
Chief Financial
|
|
2014
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
1,895,080
|
|
1,146,270
|
|
781,200
|
|
|
|
4,299
|
|
4,526,849
|
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William J. Deckelman,
Jr.
|
|
2016
|
|
539,700
|
|
300,000
|
|
2,725,182
|
|
551,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,733
|
|
4,141,207
|
Executive Vice
|
|
2015
|
|
539,700
|
|
|
|
1,058,929
|
|
503,168
|
|
361,600
|
|
14,374
|
|
7,541
|
|
2,485,312
|
President,
General
|
|
2014
|
|
539,700
|
|
|
|
1,050,704
|
|
552,355
|
|
474,930
|
|
2,212
|
|
21,294
|
|
2,641,195
|
Counsel and
Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen J. Hilton
|
|
2016
|
|
650,000
|
|
325,000
|
|
4,772,007
|
|
1,395,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,661
|
|
7,145,736
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
General Manager,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global
Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Smith
|
|
2016
|
|
650,000
|
|
|
|
3,993,937
|
|
730,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,136
|
|
5,383,822
|
Executive Vice
|
|
2015
|
|
650,000
|
|
50,000
|
|
1,375,609
|
|
727,173
|
|
217,750
|
|
|
|
27,321
|
|
3,047,853
|
President,
Global
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
2016
|
|
643,423
|
|
|
|
2,831,740
|
|
797,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,716
|
|
4,301,058
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
2015
|
|
605,000
|
|
|
|
1,194,643
|
|
583,274
|
|
546,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,929,837
|
and
General Manager,
|
|
2014
|
|
532,692
|
|
|
|
1,037,220
|
|
562,895
|
|
529,370
|
|
|
|
25,768
|
|
2,687,945
|
Americas Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____________________
1.
|
Mr. Lawrie joined the Company as President and Chief Executive
Officer on March 19, 2012.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Saleh joined the Company as
Executive Vice President and CFO on May 23, 2012.
|
|
|
Mr. Deckelman joined the Company
as Executive Vice President and General Counsel in 2008.
|
|
|
Mr. Hilton joined the Company as
Executive Vice President and General Manager, Global Infrastructure
Services on March 3, 2015.
|
|
|
Mr. Smith joined the Company as a
Vice President on May 13, 2013 and was promoted to Executive Vice
President, Global Business Services, on August 17, 2013.
|
|
|
Mr. Zolet joined the Company on
July 26, 2010 and was promoted to EVP & GM on October 6,
2012.
|
56
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
2.
|
The amounts shown in Column (c) reflect all salary earned during
the fiscal year, whether or not payment was deferred pursuant to the
Deferred Compensation Plan or any other plan. All NEOs are paid in U.S.
dollars.
|
|
3.
|
The amounts shown in Column (d) for Fiscal 2016 reflect (i) the
discretionary transaction success bonuses awarded to Messrs. Lawrie, Saleh
and Deckelman for their performance in executing the Separation and Merger
and (ii) the guaranteed bonus for Mr. Hilton. Mr Hilton received 50% of
the bonus in cash and 50% in the form of RSUs vesting on the first
anniversary of the grant date. See the CD&A for additional details.
The amount for Fiscal 2015 for Mr. Smith reflects a new-hire sign-on
bonus.
|
|
|
4.
|
The amounts shown in Column (e) reflect the aggregate grant date
fair values computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for
performance-vesting and service-vesting RSUs granted during the fiscal
year, including Career Shares, where applicable. Career Shares are subject
to the CEOs nomination and Committee approval.
|
|
|
Pursuant to SEC rules, we present
the amounts excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures. For a
discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation of RSUs, reference is
made to the section of Note 1 to the Companys consolidated financial
statements set forth in the Companys 2016 Annual Report providing details
of the Companys accounting under FASB ASC Topic 718.
|
|
|
There were no NEOs with Stock
Awards cancelled or forfeited during FY2016.
|
|
|
A substantial portion of the
stock awards granted consisted of PSUs. For all PSUs, the amounts included
in Column (e) reflect the value at the grant date based upon the estimated
performance during the performance period at 100% of target. The maximum
grant date values of the Fiscal 2016 stock awards (including
service-vesting RSUs and Career Shares, and assuming that PSUs granted on
May 22, 2015 have a pay out at the maximum of 200% of target, and
retention PSUs granted on December 15, 2015 have a pay out at the maximum
of 100% of target) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2016
Stock
|
|
|
Awards
at
|
Name
|
|
Maximum Value ($)
|
J. Michael
Lawrie
|
|
21,849,923
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
7,402,786
|
William J. Deckelman,
Jr.
|
|
3,556,117
|
Stephen J. Hilton
|
|
6,873,521
|
James R. Smith
|
|
5,094,753
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
4,032,605
|
|
|
5.
|
The amounts shown in Column (f) reflect the aggregate Black Scholes
grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for
stock options granted during the fiscal
year.
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
57
|
Table of Contents
|
Pursuant to SEC rules, we present
the amounts excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures. For a
discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation of Stock Options,
reference is made to the section of Note 1 of the Companys 2016 Annual
Report filed on Form 10-K that provides details of the Companys
accounting under FASB ASC Topic 718.
|
|
|
|
During FY2016, there were no
forfeitures/cancellations of Stock Option grants to any Named Executive
Officer.
|
|
6.
|
The amounts shown in Column (g) reflect amounts earned during the
fiscal year under the EICP, whether or not payment was deferred pursuant
to the Deferred Compensation Plan.
|
|
7.
|
Mr. Deckelman was the only NEO who participated in the Companys
pension plan in the years presented. The Companys pension plan was
transferred to CSRA in connection with the Separation. No NEO received
above market or preferential earnings from the Deferred Compensation Plan
for any year presented in the table.
|
|
8.
|
Column (i) includes the total dollar amount of all other
compensation, perquisites and other property paid to the NEOs. During
Fiscal 2016, the Company provided the following perquisites and other
personal benefits, or property, to NEOs, except as otherwise indicated:
personal use of Company aircraft (Mr. Lawrie), annual medical screening
(Messrs. Lawrie and Zolet), and Financial Counseling (Messrs. Deckelman
and Zolet). In addition, the Company makes matching contributions to the
Companys broad-based 401(k) defined contribution plan on behalf of the
NEOs. The Company also pays premiums for life insurance policies for the
benefit of the NEOs, none of whom has or will receive, or has been
allocated, an interest in any cash surrender value under these
policies.
|
|
|
The incremental cost of each
perquisite representing more than 10% of the value of all of an
executives perquisites or, if greater, more than $25,000, and the amount
of matching contributions to the defined contribution plan and life
insurance premiums paid for each NEO in Fiscal Year 2016 are set forth
below:
|
|
|
|
|
Personal
Use
|
|
401(k)
Plan
|
|
Basic
Life
|
|
Named Executive
Officer
|
|
of Company
|
|
Matching
|
|
Insurance
|
|
(NEO)
|
|
Aircraft
|
|
Contributions
|
|
Premiums
|
|
J. Michael
Lawrie
|
|
264,269
|
|
7,798
|
|
1,824
|
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
|
|
5,300
|
|
1,277
|
|
William J. Deckelman,
Jr.
|
|
|
|
6,850
|
|
985
|
|
Stephen J.
Hilton
|
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
1,186
|
|
James R. Smith
|
|
|
|
7,950
|
|
1,186
|
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
|
|
6,849
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
The incremental cost of Mr.
Lawries use of Company aircraft is based on the variable costs to the
Company, including fuel costs, on-board catering, landing/ramp fees and
other miscellaneous variable costs. This calculation does not include
fixed costs which do not change based on usage, such as depreciation,
leasing costs, and flight crew salaries.
All employees (including the
NEOs) with at least one year of service are vested in the matching
contributions credited to their 401(k)
accounts.
|
58
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Summary of CEO Compensation
Realized in Fiscal 2016
|
The table below provides a different
perspective on compensation that is supplemental to the information contained in
the Summary Compensation Table. This table details the pre-tax income realized
by Mr. Lawrie during Fiscal 2016 from base salary, annual incentive
compensation, and annual cycle and inducement long term equity incentive
compensation from which Mr. Lawrie has received cash or vested shares (including
dividend equivalents paid on RSUs) with respect to our Common Stock. It does not
include non-qualified deferred compensation or other compensation included in
column h of the Summary Compensation Table or vested, unexercised stock
options. It also does not include any income realized by Mr. Lawrie in
connection with the vesting or exercise of any stock awards granted by
CSRA.
In Fiscal 2016, the majority of Mr.
Lawries realized compensation resulted from performance-based awards, including
the accelerated vesting of Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2015 PSUs upon the Separation.
In addition, the Companys success enabled 150% of target Fiscal 2013 annual
cycle PSU grants and, prior to the Separation, 25% of target Fiscal 2014 PSUs to
experience accelerated vesting after certification of Fiscal 2015
EPS.
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable
|
|
Rate/Target
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Cash
Compensation
|
|
Period
|
|
($)
|
|
Amount
($)
|
|
Explanation
|
Salary
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$1,250,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
Represents base salary for full FY2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Cash Incentive
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$1,875,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,250,000
|
|
|
Target EICP was set at 150% of
base salary. None of the NEOs received an annual incentive payout under
the EICP for Fiscal 2016 due to the Companys failure to achieve 80% of
its Separation-adjusted Operating Income target for Fiscal 2016. However,
in order to recognize and reward their efforts and leadership in executing
the Separation and Merger of CSRA in Fiscal 2016, the Committee approved a
discretionary transaction success bonus to Mr. Lawrie.
|
|
Total Cash
Compensation
|
|
|
|
$3,125,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Award
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable
|
|
Date
Value
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Equity Compensation
|
|
Period
|
|
($)
|
|
Amount ($)
|
|
|
Time-Vesting
Inducement RSUs
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$614,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,982,000
|
|
|
A total of 50,000
Time-Vesting Inducement RSUs (representing 25% of the 200,000 RSU grant
with a 4-year graded vesting schedule) vested on April 1, 2016 (i.e., the
final day of FY2016). The Pre-Tax Realized Income includes the 179% CSC
stock price increase from grant date through vesting date plus $268,500 of
dividend equivalents, during that period.
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
59
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
Award
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable
|
|
Date
Value
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Equity
Compensation
|
|
Period
|
|
($)
|
|
Amount ($)
|
|
|
FY2013
Performance-Vesting
Annual Cycle RSUs
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
$7,875,008
|
|
$18,788,216
|
|
In May 2015,
270,062 PSUs (representing 150% of the FY2013 PSU grant) experienced
accelerated vesting because FY2015 EPS exceeded the pre-specified EPS goal
for such accelerated vesting. Pre-Tax Realized income is reported based
on the CSC stock price as of June 8, 2015, the day the vested PSUs were
distributed. The Pre-Tax Realized Income includes the 129.9% CSC stock
price increase from grant date through vesting date plus $680,559 of
dividend equivalents, during that period.
|
FY2014
Performance Vesting
Annual Cycle RSUs
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
$552,988
|
|
$1,898,602
|
|
In May 2015,
27,608 PSUs (representing 25% of the FY2014 Annual Cycle PSU grant)
experienced accelerated vesting because FY2015 EPS exceeded the
pre-specified EPS goal for such accelerated vesting. Pre-Tax Realized
Income is reported based on the CSC stock price as of June 8, 2015, the
day the vested PSUs were distributed. The Pre-Tax Realized Income includes
the 234.7% CSC stock price increase from grant date through vesting date
plus $47,486 of dividend equivalents, during that
period.
|
FY2014
Performance-Vesting
Annual Cycle RSUs
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$3,317,970
|
|
$5,946,837
|
|
In November 2015,
165,650 PSUs (representing 150% of the FY2014 Annual Cycle PSU grant)
experienced accelerated vesting in connection with the Separation. Pre-Tax
Realized income is reported based on the CSC stock price as of February
12, 2016, the day the vested PSUs were distributed. The Pre-Tax Realized
Income includes the 56.4% CSC stock price increase from grant date through
vesting date plus $757,023 of dividend equivalents, during that
period.
|
60
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
Award
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable
|
|
Date Value
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Equity
Compensation
|
|
Period
|
|
($)
|
|
Amount ($)
|
|
|
FY2015 Performance Vesting
Annual Cycle
RSUs
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
$586,396
|
|
$1,458,908
|
|
In May 2015, 21,464 PSUs (representing 25% of the FY2015 Annual
Cycle PSU grant) experienced accelerated vesting because FY2015 EPS
exceeded the pre-specified EPS goal for such accelerated vesting. Pre-Tax
Realized Income is reported based on the CSC stock price as of June 8,
2015, the day the vested PSUs were distributed. The Pre-Tax Realized
Income includes the 145.4% CSC stock price increase from grant date
through vesting date plus $19,747 of dividend equivalents, during that
period.
|
FY2015 Performance Vesting
Annual Cycle
RSUs
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$1,055,454
|
|
$1,356,021
|
|
In November 2015, 38,633 PSUs (representing 45% of the FY2015
Annual Cycle PSU grant) experienced accelerated vesting in connection with
the Separation. Pre-Tax Realized Income is reported based on the CSC stock
price as of February 12, 2016, the day the vested PSUs were distributed.
The Pre-Tax Realized Income includes the 14.7% CSC stock price increase
from grant date through vesting date plus $145,649 of dividend
equivalents, during that period.
|
FY2015 Special Performance
Vesting RSUs
|
|
Fiscal
2015/
Fiscal
2016
|
|
$2,561,350
|
|
$2,778,126
|
|
40,368 PSUs (representing 100% of the FY2015 one-time PSU grant)
vested in July 2015 at the end of the one-year vesting period. Pre-Tax
Realized Income is reported based on the CSC stock price as of July 15,
2015, the day the vested PSUs were distributed. The Pre-Tax Realized
Income includes the 7% CSC stock price increase from grant date through
vesting date plus $37,139 of dividend equivalents, during that
period.
|
FY2013 Stock Options
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$109,440
|
|
$162,554
|
|
On July 16, 2015, 4,000 Stock Options = 1% of the
FY2013 Stock Option grant were exercised and sold. The Pretax Realized
income includes 146.4% Stock price
increase.
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
61
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
Award
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable
|
|
Date Value
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Equity
Compensation
|
|
Period
|
|
($)
|
|
Amount ($)
|
|
|
FY2013 Stock Options
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$109,440
|
|
$160,260
|
|
On July 17, 2015, 4,000 Stock Options = 1% of the FY2013 Stock
Option grant were exercised and sold. The Pretax Realized income includes
146.4% Stock price increase.
|
FY2013 Stock Options
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$16,443
|
|
$22,655
|
|
On July 27, 2015, 601 Stock Options were exercised and sold. The
Pretax Realized income includes 137.8% Stock price
increase.
|
FY2013 Stock Options
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$614,000
|
|
$897,340
|
|
On January 16, 2016, 50,000 Stock Options = 12% of the FY2013 Stock
Option grant were exercised and sold. The Pre-tax Realized income includes
146.1% Stock price increase.
|
FY2013 Stock Options
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$115,420
|
|
$148,820
|
|
On February 26, 2016, 9,399 Stock Options = 2% of the
FY2013 Stock Option grant were exercised and sold. The Pre-tax Realized
income includes 128.9% Stock price increase.
|
FY2013 Stock Options
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$49,120
|
|
$70,910
|
|
On March 10, 2016, 4,000 Stock Options = 1% of the
FY2013 Stock Option grant were exercised and sold. The Pre-tax Realized
income includes 144.4% Stock price increase.
|
FY2013 Stock Options
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$109,206
|
|
$163,553
|
|
On March 10, 2016, 8,893 Stock Options = 2% of the
FY2013 Stock Option grant were exercised and sold. The Pre-tax Realized
income includes 149.8% Stock price increase.
|
FY2013 Stock Options
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$50,348
|
|
$75,098
|
|
On March 11, 2016, 4,100 Stock Options = 1% of the
FY2013 Stock Option grant were exercised and sold. The Pre-tax Realized
income includes 149.2% Stock price increase.
|
FY2013 Stock Options
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$389,190
|
|
$583,345
|
|
On March 11, 2016, 31,693 Stock Options = 8% of the
FY2013 Stock Option grant were exercised and sold. The Pre-tax Realized
income includes 149.9% Stock price
increase.
|
62
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
Award
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable
|
|
Date Value
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Equity
Compensation
|
|
Period
|
|
($)
|
|
Amount ($)
|
|
|
FY2013 Stock
Options
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$531,896
|
|
$833,478
|
|
On March 22, 2016, 43,314 Stock
Options = 11% of the FY2013 Stock Option grant were exercised and sold.
The Pre-tax Realized income includes 156.7% Stock price
increase.
|
FY2013 Stock
Options
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
$98,240
|
|
$154,809
|
|
On March 23, 2016, 8,000 Stock
Options = 2% of the FY2013 Stock Option grant were exercised and sold. The
Pre-tax Realized income includes 157.6% Stock price
increase.
|
Total Equity
Compensation
|
|
|
|
$18,755,909
|
|
$37,481,532
|
|
|
Total Realized
Compensation
|
|
|
|
$21,880,909
|
|
$40,981,532
|
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
63
|
Table of Contents
Grants of Plan-Based
Awards
|
The following table provides
information on EICP awards, RSUs and stock options granted to the NEOs in the
Fiscal Year ended April 1, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts
Under
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
1
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards
2
|
|
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or
Units
3
(#)
(j)
|
|
All
Other
Option
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
(k)
|
|
Exercise
or Base
Price
of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
(l)
|
|
Grant
Date Fair
Value
of
Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)
(m)
|
Name
(a)
|
|
Grant
Date
(b)
|
|
Approval
Date
(c)
|
|
Threshold
($)
(d)
|
|
Target
($)
(e)
|
|
Maximum
($)
(f)
|
|
Threshold
(#)
(g)
|
|
Target
(#)
(h)
|
|
Maximum
(#)
(i)
|
J. Michael Lawrie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EICP
|
|
|
|
|
|
937,500
|
|
1,875,000
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs
Performance
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,672
|
|
78,687
|
|
157,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,388,486
|
Retention PSU
Award
|
|
12/15/2015
|
|
11/26/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,435
|
|
338,869
|
|
338,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,271,119
|
RSUs Career
Shares
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
801,832
|
Stock Options
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,051
|
|
68.48
|
|
3,577,099
|
Paul N.
Saleh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EICP
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
700,000
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs Performance
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,295
|
|
25,180
|
|
50,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,724,326
|
Retention PSU Award
|
|
12/15/2015
|
|
11/26/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,534
|
|
118,604
|
|
118,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,594,887
|
RSUs Career Shares
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
359,246
|
Stock Options
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,416
|
|
68.48
|
|
1,144,665
|
William J.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deckelman,
Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EICP
|
|
|
|
|
|
269,850
|
|
539,700
|
|
1,079,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs
Performance
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,034
|
|
12,134
|
|
24,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
830,936
|
Retention PSU
Award
|
|
12/15/2015
|
|
11/26/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,433
|
|
54,866
|
|
54,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,662,988
|
RSUs Career
Shares
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,257
|
Stock Options
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,222
|
|
68.48
|
|
551,592
|
Stephen J.
Hilton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EICP
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
650,000
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs Performance
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,672
|
|
30,688
|
|
61,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,101,514
|
Retention PSU Award
|
|
12/15/2015
|
|
11/26/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,053
|
|
88,106
|
|
88,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,670,493
|
Stock Options
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,320
|
|
68.48
|
|
1,395,071
|
James R. Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EICP
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
650,000
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs
Performance
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,019
|
|
16,075
|
|
32,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100,816
|
Retention PSU
Award
|
|
12/15/2015
|
|
11/26/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,053
|
|
88,106
|
|
88,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,670,493
|
RSUs - Career
Shares
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,628
|
Stock Options
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,739
|
|
68.48
|
|
730,750
|
David W.
Zolet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EICP
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
650,000
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs Performance
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,384
|
|
17,536
|
|
35,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200,865
|
Retention PSU Award
|
|
12/15/2015
|
|
11/26/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,027
|
|
44,053
|
|
44,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,335,246
|
RSUs Career Shares
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,628
|
Stock Options
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
5/21/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,897
|
|
68.48
|
|
797,180
|
____________________
1.
|
|
The amounts shown in Columns (d), (e) and (f) reflect the
threshold, target and maximum amounts which could be earned under the EICP
for Fiscal 2016. Actual amounts earned for Fiscal 2016 under the EICP are
set forth in column (g) of the Summary Compensation
Table.
|
64
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
2.
|
|
For the annual cycle PSUs, the
number of shares which may vest ranges from 25% of the target shares if
Fiscal 2016 or Fiscal 2017 EPS threshold is met, to a maximum of 200% of
the target shares if Fiscal 2018 EPS maximum is achieved. The threshold
number contained in Column (g) represents achievement of 25% of target,
but the actual payment could range to zero. In May 2016, the Committee
determined that the threshold EPS was achieved for Fiscal 2016. Thus, for
all NEOs, 25% of the target units were earned and paid during the first
quarter of Fiscal Year 2017.
|
|
|
|
The retention PSU award for Mr.
Lawrie is divided in two parts--37.5% of the award relates to the
achievement of financial (EPS) goals for Fiscal 2018 (Financial
Component) and the remaining 62.5% relates to the achievement of both a
financial (EPS) goal for Fiscal 2017 and certain organizational health
goals for the period ending March 31, 2017 (Organizational Health
Component). For the Financial Component, the number of shares which may
vest ranges from 50% of the target Financial Component shares if the
Fiscal 2018 EPS threshold is met, to a maximum of 100% of the target
Financial Component shares if the Fiscal 2018 EPS target is achieved. The
threshold number contained in Column (g) represents achievement of 50% of
target, but the actual payment of the Financial Component could range to
zero. Up to 100% of the target Organizational Health Component shares may
vest in tranches starting on March 31, 2017, if the applicable performance
goals have been achieved. There is no threshold payout associated with the
Organizational Health Component award. The maximum number of shares that
may pay out under both components of the award is set forth in column
(i).
|
|
|
|
The retention PSU awards for the
NEOs other than Mr. Lawrie relate solely to the achievement of financial
(EPS) goals for Fiscal 2018. The number of shares which may vest ranges
from 50% of the target shares if the Fiscal 2018 EPS threshold is met, to
a maximum of 100% of the target shares if the Fiscal 2018 EPS target is
achieved. In addition, Mr. Saleh may vest in 33% of the target shares
subject to his award if the Fiscal 2016 or Fiscal 2017 EPS threshold is
met. The threshold number contained in Column (g) represents achievement
of 50% of target for the remaining NEOs other than Mr. Saleh, and 33% of
target for Mr. Saleh, but in each case the actual payment could range to
zero. In May 2016, the Committee determined that the threshold EPS was
achieved for Fiscal 2016. Thus, Mr. Saleh will be eligible for early
vesting of 33% of his award on December 15, 2016, subject to his continued
employment.
|
|
|
|
See CD&A, Fiscal 2016
Performance-Based Retention Awards for additional details.
|
|
3.
|
|
Career Shares granted in Fiscal
2016 were RSUs that vest upon the executive reaching a certain age and/or
a certain number of years of service. See CD&A, Other Executive
Compensation -- Career Shares for additional details. Career Shares are
settled in shares of CSC stock at the rate of 10% of the shares granted on
each of the first ten anniversaries of the executives retirement
date.
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
65
|
Table of Contents
Outstanding Equity Awards at
Fiscal Year-End
|
The following table provides
information on unexercised stock options and unvested RSUs held by the NEOs on
April 1, 2016. All exercise prices and share numbers in the table for awards
with grant dates prior to the Separation reflect the adjustments made in
connection with the Separation as described in the CD&A under Effect of
Separation on Outstanding Equity Awards.
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
(a)
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
(b)
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
(c)
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
(d)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
(e)
|
|
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
(f)
|
|
Market
Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
1
($)
(g)
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have
Not
Vested
2
(#)
(h)
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value
of Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That
Have
Not Vested
1, 2
($)
(i)
|
J. Michael
Lawrie
|
|
12/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,869
|
3
|
11,613,041
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,405
|
4
|
6,011,129
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
379,026
|
5
|
30.73
|
|
5/22/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/16/2014
|
|
124,634
|
|
62,317
|
6
|
27.32
|
|
5/16/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/16/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,757
|
7
|
882,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/20/2013
|
|
281,458
|
|
|
|
20.03
|
|
5/20/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/16/2012
|
|
260,461
|
|
|
|
12.28
|
|
4/16/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
12/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,604
|
3
|
4,064,559
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,130
|
4
|
1,923,575
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,246
|
8
|
179,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
121,287
|
5
|
30.73
|
|
5/22/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/16/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,242
|
7
|
282,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/16/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,056
|
8
|
207,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/16/2014
|
|
39,882
|
|
19,942
|
6
|
27.32
|
|
5/16/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/20/2013
|
|
90,095
|
|
|
|
20.03
|
|
5/20/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/20/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,104
|
8
|
243,454
|
|
|
|
|
William J. Deckelman,
Jr.
|
|
12/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,866
|
3
|
1,880,258
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,048
|
4
|
926,935
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,377
|
9
|
115,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
58,446
|
5
|
30.73
|
|
5/22/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/16/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,149
|
7
|
142,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/16/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,972
|
9
|
136,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/16/2014
|
|
19,218
|
|
9,610
|
6
|
27.32
|
|
5/16/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/20/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,503
|
9
|
222,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/20/2013
|
|
43,414
|
|
|
|
20.03
|
|
5/20/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/22/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,492
|
9
|
153,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/20/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,561
|
9
|
156,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/20/2011
|
|
39,440
|
|
|
|
17.30
|
|
6/20/2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/25/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,051
|
9
|
173,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/25/2010
|
|
25,214
|
|
|
|
21.64
|
|
5/25/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/26/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,801
|
9
|
233,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/26/2009
|
|
14,111
|
|
|
|
18.90
|
|
5/26/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/27/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
9
|
35,092
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen J. Hilton
|
|
12/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,106
|
3
|
3,019,393
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
147,820
|
5
|
30.73
|
|
5/22/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,408
|
4
|
2,344,342
|
66
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
(a)
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
(b)
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
(c)
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
(d)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
(e)
|
|
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
(f)
|
|
Market
Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
1
($)
(g)
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have
Not
Vested
2
(#)
(h)
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value
of Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That
Have
Not Vested
1, 2
($)
(i)
|
James R. Smith
|
|
12/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,106
|
3
|
3,019,393
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,833
|
4
|
1,227,997
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,251
|
10
|
111,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
77,429
|
5
|
30.73
|
|
5/22/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/16/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,740
|
7
|
196,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/16/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,455
|
10
|
118,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/16/2014
|
|
27,776
|
|
13,887
|
6
|
27.32
|
|
5/16/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/16/2013
|
|
18,904
|
|
|
|
23.62
|
|
9/16/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/17/2013
|
|
14,847
|
|
|
|
20.28
|
|
6/17/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,632
|
11
|
295,819
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
12/15/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,053
|
3
|
1,509,696
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,090
|
4
|
1,339,614
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
12
|
73,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/22/2015
|
|
|
|
84,468
|
5
|
30.73
|
|
5/22/2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/15/2014
|
|
2,644
|
|
1,321
|
6
|
28.14
|
|
7/15/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/15/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520
|
7
|
17,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/16/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,171
|
12
|
74,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/16/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,048
|
7
|
138,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/16/2014
|
|
19,586
|
|
9,792
|
6
|
27.32
|
|
5/16/2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/20/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,938
|
12
|
100,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/20/2013
|
|
44,242
|
|
|
|
20.03
|
|
5/20/2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/20/2011
|
|
12,403
|
|
|
|
17.30
|
|
6/20/2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/16/2010
|
|
10,581
|
|
|
|
18.96
|
|
8/16/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____________________
1.
|
|
As required by SEC rules, the
market value of service-vesting RSUs shown in column (f) and Performance
Share Units shown in Column (h) is based on the $34.27 closing market
price of CSC common stock on April 1, 2016.
|
|
2.
|
|
As required by SEC rules, the
number of unearned Performance Share Units and the market value of
unearned Performance Share Units shown in Columns (h) and (i) are based on
achieving target performance goals for both the regular-cycle Fiscal 2016
PSU awards and the December 2015 retention PSU awards.
|
|
3.
|
|
Represents the retention
Performance Share Units described in the CD&A, Fiscal 2016
Performance- Based Retention Awards. 37.5% of Mr. Lawrie's PSUs vest on
December 15, 2018, subject to the Company's EPS performance for Fiscal
2018. 31.25% of Mr. Lawrie's PSUs vest on March 31, 2017, 15.625% vest on
September 30, 2017 and the remaining 15.625% vest on March 31, 2018,
subject in each case to the Company's EPS performance for Fiscal 2017 and
the achievement of certain organizational goals. 100% of each of the other
NEOs' PSUs vest on December 15, 2018, subject to the Company's EPS
performance for Fiscal 2018. In addition, for Mr. Saleh's PSUs, partial
accelerated vesting may occur if the Company's EPS performance is at or
above certain levels during Fiscal 2016 or Fiscal 2017. In
May
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
67
|
Table of Contents
|
|
2016, the Committee determined
that the threshold performance goals had been achieved during Fiscal 2016,
resulting in accelerated vesting of 33% of Mr. Saleh's PSUs, which will be
paid on the earlier of December 15, 2018 or Mr. Saleh's separation from
service.
|
|
4.
|
|
Represents the target number of
Performance Share Units that vest subject to the Company's EPS performance
for the three-year period ending on the last day of Fiscal 2018. Partial
accelerated vesting may occur if the Company's EPS performance is at or
above certain levels during Fiscal 2016 or Fiscal 2017. In May 2016, the
Committee determined that the threshold performance goal had been achieved
during Fiscal 2016, resulting in accelerated vesting and payout of 25% of
the target units during the first quarter of Fiscal 2017.
|
|
5.
|
|
Vests in equal tranches on the
first three anniversaries of the grant date.
|
|
6.
|
|
Half vested on May 16, 2016 and
the remaining half will vest on May 16, 2017.
|
|
7.
|
|
Represents the 30% portion of the
target Fiscal 2015 PSUs that were converted at the Separation into
time-based RSUs. Half vested in May 2016 and the remaining half will vest
in May 2017.
|
|
8.
|
|
Represents Career Shares that
will vest on May 23, 2017.
|
|
9.
|
|
Represents Career Shares that
will vest on January 14, 2018.
|
|
10.
|
|
Represents Career Shares that
will begin to vest on January 28, 2022. 80% of the Career Shares will vest
on that date, 10% will vest on May 13, 2022 and the remaining 10% will
vest on May 13, 2023.
|
|
11.
|
|
Vested on June 17,
2016.
|
|
12.
|
|
Represents Career Shares, 20% of
which vested on July 26, 2016 and 20% of which will vest on each
succeeding anniversary thereof.
|
68
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of
Contents
Option Exercises and Stock
Vested
|
The following table provides
information on stock options held by the NEOs that were exercised and RSUs held
by the NEOs that vested during the Fiscal Year ended April 1, 2016.
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired
on
|
|
Realized
|
|
Acquired
|
|
Value
Realized
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
on
Exercise
|
|
on
Vesting
1
|
|
on
Vesting
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
J. Michael
Lawrie
|
|
168,000
|
|
3,272,821
|
|
661,887
|
|
35,508,633
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
139,130
|
|
6,022,938
|
|
207,181
|
|
11,526,684
|
William J. Deckelman,
Jr.
|
|
96,348
|
|
3,184,505
|
|
80,710
|
|
4,286,390
|
Stephen J. Hilton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,401
|
|
1,502,008
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
14,919
|
|
629,000
|
|
77,613
|
|
3,762,451
|
____________________
1.
|
|
Reflects the gross number of
underlying shares for restricted stock units on the vest date. For Mr.
Lawrie, these shares represent the full vesting of his Fiscal 2013 PSUs
and partial vesting of his Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2015 PSUs in June 2015,
the accelerated vesting of his Fiscal 2014 PSUs and of a portion of his
Fiscal 2015 PSUs in connection with the Separation, the vesting of his
Fiscal 2015 special PSU award in July 2015, the vesting of 36,393 Career
Shares upon Mr. Lawrie's attainment of age 62 in June 2015 that will be
settled in ten installments following his separation from service, and the
vesting of the final tranche of his Time-Vesting Inducement RSUs on April
1, 2016. For Mr. Saleh, these shares represent the full vesting of his
Fiscal 2013 PSUs and partial vesting of his Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2015
PSUs in June 2015, the accelerated vesting of his Fiscal 2014 PSUs and a
portion of his Fiscal 2015 PSUs in connection with the Separation, and the
vesting of his time-based inducement RSUs in June 2015. For Mr. Deckelman,
these shares represent the full vesting of his Fiscal 2013 PSUs and
partial vesting of his Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2015 PSUs in June 2015 and
the accelerated vesting of his Fiscal 2014 PSUs and a portion of his
Fiscal 2015 PSUs in connection with the Separation. For Mr. Smith, these
shares represent the partial vesting of his Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2015
PSUs in June 2015 and the accelerated vesting of his Fiscal 2014 PSUs and
a portion of his Fiscal 2015 PSUs in connection with the Separation. For
Mr. Zolet, these shares represent the full vesting of his Fiscal 2013 PSUs
and partial vesting of his Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2015 PSUs in June 2015,
the accelerated vesting of his Fiscal 2014 PSUs and a portion of his
Fiscal 2015 PSUs in connection with the Separation, and the vesting of
7,266 Career Shares in March 2016 that will
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
69
|
Table of
Contents
be settled in ten installments
following his separation from service. Mr. Hilton did not vest in any shares in
Fiscal 2016. The total number of shares acquired and the value realized net of
shares withheld for tax payment to each of the NEOs are as follows:
|
|
# of
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
Issued on
|
|
Value
Realized
|
Name
|
|
Vesting
|
|
on Vesting ($)
|
J. Michael
Lawrie
|
|
380,754
|
|
20,735,889
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
110,530
|
|
6,174,282
|
William J. Deckelman,
Jr.
|
|
40,143
|
|
2,131,927
|
Steven J. Hilton
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Smith
|
|
22,289
|
|
898,203
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
42,765
|
|
2,023,738
|
Mr. Deckelman was the only NEO who
participated in the Companys tax-qualified pension plan during Fiscal 2016. In
connection with the Separation, the Company's qualified and non-qualified
pension plans were transferred to CSRA. As a result, neither Mr. Deckelman nor
any other NEO had an accrued benefit under any qualified or nonqualified pension
plan sponsored by the Company as of April 1, 2016.
Fiscal Year 2016 Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation
|
The Deferred Compensation Plan is an
unfunded, nonqualified plan that permits participants to defer U.S. federal and
most state income tax on up to 100% of their annual cash incentive award, up to
80% of their annual base salary, and up to 100% of amounts payable in cash to
non-employee directors for board services.
Each participant is required to select
from among four notional investment options, and deferred amounts are credited
with earnings (or losses) based on the participants investment choices. The
notional investment options mirror actual investment options offered under the
Companys broad-based 401(k) defined contribution plan. The annual returns of
the notional investment options for the twelve-month period ending March 31,
2016 were as follows: SSgA Money Market Fund, 0.21%; BlackRock Core Bond, 1.82%;
Mellon S&P 500 Index Fund, 1.78%; and SSgA Target Retirement Income, (0.73)%.
Participants elect when they wish to
receive distributions of their Deferred Compensation Plan account balances upon
termination of employment, death, disability, change in control or a date
certain. There is a potential six-month delay in payments under the Deferred
Compensation Plan to certain specified employees (as determined under Section
409A of the Internal Revenue Code) for amounts deferred on or after January 1,
2005 (as determined under Section 409A). The Deferred Compensation Plan provides
for the crediting of earnings during any such payment delay period.
70
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of
Contents
The following table summarizes, for
each NEO, the contributions and earnings under the Deferred Compensation Plan in
Fiscal Year 2016 and the aggregate account balance as of April 1, 2016. Messrs.
Lawrie. Deckelman and Zolet are the only NEOs who participated in the Deferred
Compensation Plan during Fiscal 2016.
|
|
Executive
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Contributions
in
|
|
Earnings
in
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
Balance
at
|
Name
|
|
Last FY
($)
|
|
Last FY
($)
|
|
Distribution
($)
|
|
Last FYE
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
J. Michael
Lawrie
|
|
1,875,000
|
|
59,272
|
|
|
|
7,770,482
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William J. Deckelman,
Jr.
|
|
|
|
2,232
|
|
|
|
91,657
|
Stephen J. Hilton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
|
|
(7,986)
|
|
|
|
619,379
|
The Executive Contributions set forth
on Column (b) of this table are reported as compensation in the applicable
column of the Summary Compensation Table (i.e., FY2016 Salary and/or FY2015
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation). Earnings are not reported in the
Summary Compensation Table. There were no Company contributions to the Deferred
Compensation Plan on behalf of any NEOs for Fiscal 2016.
Potential Payments Upon Change in Control and Termination of
Employment
|
We offer certain post-employment
benefits to a select group of executive officers, including our NEOs. With the
exception of the CEO, these post-employment benefits are limited to the payments
and benefits provided under the Severance Plan and the Severance Policy. Mr.
Lawrie does not participate in the Severance Plan or the Severance Policy;
however, he is entitled to certain post-employment benefits under his employment
agreement. The post-employment benefits for our NEOs are described
below.
Change in Control Termination
Benefits
The table below reflects the value of
compensation and benefits that would become payable to each of the NEOs under
plans and arrangements existing as of April 1, 2016 (
i.e.
, the final day of Fiscal Year
2016), if a change in control had occurred on that date and, in circumstances
explained below, the executives employment had terminated. These amounts are
reported based upon the executives compensation and service levels as of such
date and, if applicable, and in accordance with SEC regulations, based on the
Companys closing stock price of $34.27 on April 1, 2016, the last trading day
of Fiscal 2016. These benefits are in addition to benefits available prior to
the occurrence of any termination of employment, including under any
then-exercisable stock options, retirement plans and deferred compensation
plans, and benefits available generally to salaried employees, such as
distributions under the Companys broad-based 401(k) plan.
The actual amounts that would be paid
upon a NEOs termination of employment in connection with a change in control
can be determined only at the time of any such event. Due to the number of
factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided upon such an
event, any actual amounts paid or distributed may be higher or lower than
reported below. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing
during the year of any such event, the Companys stock price and the executives
age and service.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
71
|
Table of Contents
The benefits payable as a result of a
change in control as reported in the columns of this table are as
follows:
●
|
Cash Severance Benefit
:
Under the Severance Plan and Mr. Lawries employment agreement, upon an
involuntary termination or a voluntary termination for good reason
following a change in control (and, in the case of executives other than
Mr. Lawrie, within a specified number of years following a change in
control), executives are paid a multiple of base salary plus average
annual earned/paid EICP during the three fiscal years prior to which the
employment termination had occurred;
|
●
|
Pro-Rata Bonus
: Mr.
Lawries employment agreement provides that, in the event of an
involuntary termination or termination for good reason following a change
in control, Mr. Lawrie also will receive a pro-rata annual bonus (EICP)
for the year in which the termination occurs based on his target bonus for
the fiscal year in which the termination
occurs;
|
●
|
Benefits Continuation
: The
Severance Plan and Mr. Lawries employment agreement provide that upon an
involuntary termination for good reason following a change in control
(and, in the case of executives other than Mr. Lawrie, within a specified
number of years following a change in control), executives also receive
the continuation of certain health and welfare benefits for a specified
period following the termination of employment;
|
●
|
Equity Awards
: The amounts
reported in the table below are the intrinsic value of stock options and
RSU awards (including PSUs and Career Shares) that vest upon a change in
control; regular-cycle PSUs, the organizational health component of Mr.
Lawries December 2015 retention PSU award and Career Shares that vest
regardless of whether the executive officers employment terminates, while
the financial component of Mr. Lawries December 2015 retention PSU award
and the December 2015 retention PSUs awarded to the other NEOs vest only
if the executives employment is terminated without cause or if the
executive resigns for good reason in connection with the change in control
(the table below assumes such termination occurred on the change in
control date); and
|
●
|
Reduction to Avoid Excise
Tax
: None of the NEOs are entitled to an excise tax gross up. To the
extent that any payments or benefits provided to Severance Plan
participants or to Mr. Lawrie (under his employment agreement) constitute
excess parachute payments under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue
Code, these payments will be reduced to the maximum amount that the
executive may receive without becoming subject to the excise tax imposed
under Section 4999 of the Code if it is determined that the executive
would retain more, on an after-tax basis, having such payments so
reduced.
|
72
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of
Contents
Additional information regarding the
conditions under which these benefits are payable and the definitions used under
the arrangements for determining whether an event triggering the benefit has
occurred are discussed further following the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early Vesting of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
Misc.
|
|
|
|
Time
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excise
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Stock
|
|
Vesting
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Tax Paid
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Benefit
1
|
|
Continuation
|
|
Options
2
|
|
RSUs
2
|
|
PSUs
2
|
|
Payments
|
|
By
NEO
3
|
|
Payments
3
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
J. Michael
Lawrie
|
|
9,081,333
|
|
43,800
|
|
1,774,855
|
|
882,692
|
|
17,624,170
|
|
29,406,850
|
|
4,824,850
|
|
24,582,000
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
2,887,808
|
|
38,936
|
|
567,953
|
|
913,226
|
|
5,988,134
|
|
10,396,057
|
|
1,790,823
|
|
8,605,234
|
William J. Deckelman,
Jr.
|
|
2,077,391
|
|
22,622
|
|
273,689
|
|
1,368,400
|
|
2,807,193
|
|
6,549,295
|
|
969,934
|
|
5,579,361
|
Stephen J. Hilton
|
|
2,600,000
|
|
55,047
|
|
523,283
|
|
|
|
5,363,735
|
|
8,542,065
|
|
1,577,772
|
|
6,964,293
|
James R. Smith
|
|
1,846,950
|
|
41,074
|
|
370,614
|
|
722,344
|
|
4,247,390
|
|
7,228,372
|
|
1,370,280
|
|
5,858,092
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
2,206,652
|
|
60,949
|
|
375,169
|
|
405,550
|
|
2,849,310
|
|
5,897,630
|
|
952,364
|
|
4,945,266
|
Totals
|
|
20,700,134
|
|
262,428
|
|
3,885,563
|
|
3,197,501
|
|
38,879,932
|
|
68,020,269
|
|
11,486,023
|
|
56,534,246
|
____________________
1.
|
|
Cash severance was calculated by
adding Fiscal 2016 base salary, prior three-year average EICP payout
(i.e., for Fiscal Years 2013-2015 performance), and for purposes of
calculating Mr. Lawries pro-rata EICP, Target Fiscal 2016
EICP.
|
|
2.
|
|
The intrinsic value of RSUs and
PSUs, per share, is equal to the closing market price of CSC common stock
on April 1, 2016 ($34.27), the final trading day of Fiscal Year 2016. The
intrinsic value of a stock option, per share, is equal to the excess of
(a) the closing market price of CSC common stock on April 1, 2016, over
(b) the options exercise price per share. All outstanding PSUs were
assumed to vest at target upon a change in control. All outstanding
service-vesting RSUs and unvested stock options were assumed to vest upon
a change in control.
|
|
3.
|
|
Reducing the full payment to each
NEO such that the executive would not be subject to the excise tax imposed
under Section 4999 of the Code would result in a smaller overall payment
than if the executive was subject to the excise tax on the full payment.
Therefore, the full payment, net of excise taxes, is shown above in the
Net Payments column.
|
Severance Plan for Senior Management
and Key Employees
. Each of the NEOs other
than Mr. Lawrie participates in the Severance Plan, which provides certain
benefits to participants in the event of a Change of Control (as defined below)
of the Company. If there were a Change of Control and any of them
either:
●
|
had a voluntary termination of
employment for Good Reason (as defined below) within two years afterward,
or
|
●
|
had an involuntary termination of
employment, other than for death, disability or Cause (as defined below),
within three years afterward,
|
then he would receive a one-time
payment and certain health and welfare benefits during a specified period after
termination. The amount of the one-time payment is equal to two times the sum of
the participants then-current annual base salary plus the average of the three
most recent annual EICP awards paid or determined. The number of years after
termination of employment during which a participant would receive health and
welfare benefits is equal to the same applicable multiple.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
73
|
Table of
Contents
There is a potential six-month delay in
payments and benefits provided under the Severance Plan to certain specified
employees (as determined under Section 409A). The Severance Plan provides for
the crediting of earnings during any such payment or benefits delay
period.
For purposes of the Severance Plan, the
following definitions apply:
●
|
Change of Control means the
consummation of a change in the ownership of the Company, a change in
effective control of the Company or a change in the ownership of a
substantial portion of the assets of the Company, in each case, as
defined under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code.
|
●
|
A participants termination of
employment with the Company is deemed for Good Reason if it occurs
within six months of any of the following without the participants
express written consent:
|
|
1.
|
|
A substantial change in the
nature, or diminution in the status, of the participants duties or
position from those in effect immediately prior to the Change of
Control;
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
A reduction by the Company in the
participants annual base salary as in effect on the date of a Change of
Control or as in effect thereafter if such compensation has been increased
and such increase was approved prior to the Change of
Control;
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
A reduction by the Company in the
overall value of benefits provided to the participant, as in effect on the
date of a Change of Control or as in effect thereafter if such benefits
have been increased and the increase was approved prior to the Change of
Control;
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
A failure to continue in effect
any stock option or other equity-based or non-equity based incentive
compensation plan in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control, or
a reduction in the participants participation in any such plan, unless
the participant is afforded the opportunity to participate in an
alternative incentive compensation plan of reasonably equivalent
value;
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
A failure to provide the
participant the same number of paid vacation days per year available to
him or her prior to the Change of Control, or any material reduction or
the elimination of any material benefit or perquisite enjoyed by the
participant immediately prior to the Change of Control;
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
Relocation of the participants
principal place of employment to any place more than 35 miles from the
participants previous principal place of employment;
|
|
|
|
7.
|
|
Any material breach by CSC of any
provision of the Severance Plan or of any agreement entered into pursuant
to the Severance Plan or any stock option or restricted stock
agreement;
|
|
|
|
8.
|
|
Conduct by the Company, against
the participants volition, that would cause the participant to commit
fraudulent acts or would expose the participant to criminal liability;
or
|
|
|
|
9.
|
|
Any failure by the Company to
obtain the assumption of the Severance Plan or any agreement entered into
pursuant to the Severance Plan by any successor or assign of
CSC;
|
provided
that for purposes of bullets
2 through 5 above, Good Reason will not exist (i) if the aggregate value of
all salary, benefits, incentive compensation arrangements, perquisites and other
compensation is reasonably equivalent to the aggregate value of salary,
benefits, incentive compensation arrangements, perquisites and other
compensation as in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control, or as in
effect thereafter if the aggregate value of such items has been increased and
such increase was approved prior to the Change
74
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of
Contents
of Control,
or (ii) if the reduction in aggregate value is due to reduced performance by the
Company, the operating unit of the Company for which the participant is
responsible, or the participant, in each case applying standards reasonably
equivalent to those utilized by the Company prior to the Change of
Control.
○
|
fraud, misappropriation,
embezzlement or other act of material misconduct against the Company or
any of its affiliates;
|
○
|
conviction of a felony involving
a crime of moral turpitude;
|
○
|
willful and knowing violation of
any rules or regulations of any governmental or regulatory body material
to the business of the Company; or
|
○
|
substantial and willful failure
to render services in accordance with the terms of the Severance Plan
(other than as a result of illness, accident or other physical or mental
incapacity), provided that (i) a demand for performance of services has
been delivered to the participant in writing by or on behalf of CSCs
Board of Directors at least 60 days prior to termination identifying the
manner in which the Board believes that the participant has failed to
perform and (ii) the participant has thereafter failed to remedy such
failure to perform.
|
Vesting of Equity Awards Upon Change
in Control
. Stock options and RSUs, including
regular-cycle PSUs and Career Shares, provide for accelerated vesting upon a
Change in Control, defined as a change in ownership of the Company, a change in
effective control of the Company or a change in the ownership of a substantial
portion of the assets of the Company, in each case as defined in Section 409A of
the Internal Revenue Code. Regular-cycle PSUs and the organizational health
component of Mr. Lawries December 2015 retention PSU award vest at target upon
a Change in Control occurring on or before the end of the final fiscal year in
the performance period. The financial component of Mr. Lawries December 2015
retention PSUs and the December 2015 retention PSUs granted to the other NEOs
vest only upon the executives termination without cause or termination for good
reason in connection with the change in control. If the change in control occurs
before the end of Fiscal 2018, vesting is based on projected performance at the
time of the change in control, and if the change in control occurs after the end
of Fiscal 2018 but before December 15, 2018, vesting is based on the actual
number of PSUs earned.
Termination Benefits Unrelated to
Change in Control
The table below reflects the value of
compensation and benefits that would become payable to each of the NEOs under
plans and arrangements existing as of April 1, 2016
if their employment had been
terminated on that date in the circumstances explained below. These amounts are
reported based upon each such executives compensation and service levels as of
such date and, if applicable, in accordance with SEC regulations, based on the
Companys closing stock price of $34.27 on April 1, 2016, the final trading day
during Fiscal 2016. These benefits are in addition to benefits available prior
to the occurrence of any termination of employment, including under
then-exercisable stock options, retirement plans and deferred compensation
plans, and benefits available generally to salaried employees, such as
distributions under the Companys broad-based 401(k) plan.
The actual amounts that would be paid
upon an NEOs termination of employment absent a change in control can be
determined only at the time of any such event. Due to the number of factors that
affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided upon such an event, any
actual amounts paid or distributed may be higher or lower than reported below.
Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing during the year of
any such event, the Companys stock price and the executives age and
service.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
75
|
Table of Contents
The benefits payable as a result of a
termination of employment as reported in the columns of this table are as
follows:
●
|
Cash Severance Benefit
:
Under the Severance Policy and Mr. Lawries employment agreement, upon an
involuntary termination without cause (or, in Mr. Lawries case, a
voluntary termination for good reason), executives are paid a multiple of
base salary (plus, in Mr. Lawries case, his target annual bonus under the
EICP);
|
●
|
Pro-Rata Bonus
: The
Severance Policy and Mr. Lawries employment agreement provide that, in
the event of an involuntary termination without cause (or, in Mr. Lawries
case, termination for good reason), executives also will receive a
pro-rata annual bonus (EICP) for the year in which the termination occurs
based on actual performance;
|
●
|
Benefits Continuation
: The
Severance Policy and Mr. Lawries employment agreement provide that upon
an involuntary termination without cause, executives also will receive the
continuation of certain health and welfare benefits for a specified period
following the termination of employment; and
|
●
|
Equity Awards
: No unvested
equity awards outstanding as of April 1, 2016 would become vested upon an
executives involuntary termination absent a change in
control.
|
Additional information regarding the
conditions under which these benefits are payable and the definitions used under
the arrangements for determining whether an event triggering the benefit has
occurred are discussed further following the table.
|
|
Cash
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
Continuation
|
|
RSUs
|
|
Payments
|
Name
|
|
Benefit ($)
1
|
|
($)
2
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
J. Michael
Lawrie
|
|
6,250,000
|
|
32,850
|
|
|
|
6,282,850
|
Paul N. Saleh
|
|
700,000
|
|
19,468
|
|
|
|
719,468
|
William J. Deckelman,
Jr.
|
|
539,700
|
|
11,311
|
|
|
|
551,011
|
Stephen J. Hilton
|
|
650,000
|
|
27,523
|
|
|
|
677,523
|
James R. Smith
|
|
650,000
|
|
20,537
|
|
|
|
670,537
|
David W. Zolet
|
|
650,000
|
|
30,475
|
|
|
|
680,475
|
Totals
|
|
9,979,400
|
|
142,164
|
|
|
|
10,121,564
|
____________________
1.
|
|
Mr. Lawrie is entitled to two
times base salary plus target bonus, plus a pro-rata bonus (EICP) for the
year of employment termination. Every other NEO is entitled to 12 months
of base salary continuation plus a pro-rata bonus (EICP) for the year of
employment termination. For purposes of this disclosure, actual Fiscal
2016 EICP is used as the pro-rata bonus described above.
|
|
2.
|
|
Mr. Lawrie is entitled to 18
months of Company-subsidized COBRA continuation coverage, while the other
NEOs are entitled to 12 months of Company-subsidized COBRA continuation
coverage.
|
Executive Officer Severance
Policy
. The Company also maintains the
Severance Policy to provide severance benefits to certain executives whose
employment with the Company is terminated in situations not involving a change
in control. The Severance Policy covers only those executive officers reporting
directly to the CEO who are subject to Section 16 of the 1934 Act, and provides
for benefits similar to those offered under the Severance Plan.
76
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of
Contents
Upon termination of employment by the
Company without Cause (as defined in the Severance Policy), each covered
executive may receive, in the discretion of the Company and the Committee, up to
12 months of base salary continuation, paid in installments, and 12 months of
Company-provided healthcare coverage continuation. Terminated executives also
are eligible to receive a pro-rata portion of the EICP award earned for the year
of employment termination, subject to approval by the Committee.
Vesting of Equity Awards Upon
Terminations of Employment
. All annual equity
awards provide for accelerated vesting (unless the Compensation Committee
determines otherwise) upon retirement, other than for Cause (as defined below),
at age 62 or older with at least ten years of service (and, in the case of PSUs,
provided the executives retirement date is more than one year after the grant
date). None of the NEOs were eligible to retire under this definition as of
April 1, 2016, the last day of our 2016 Fiscal Year. In addition, all annual
equity awards, along with Career Shares and options, provide for accelerated
vesting upon an executives termination of employment due to death or permanent
disability, with vesting of annual-cycle PSUs and December 2015 retention PSUs
occurring with respect to only a pro-rata fraction of the target amount (based
on the executives service during the applicable performance period), as opposed
to the full target amount, if such termination occurs during the applicable
performance period. If the NEOs had terminated employment due to death or
permanent disability on April 1, 2016, they would have each received the amounts
shown next to their names for early vesting of stock options, service-vesting
RSUs and PSUs on the Change in Control Termination Benefits table above, except
that amounts for annual-cycle PSU grants and December 2015 PSU grants would be
pro-rated.
Stock options granted prior to May 2013
that are vested but unexercised at the time of employment termination remain
exercisable until the earlier of (a) the option expiration date or (b) the fifth
anniversary of employment termination (for terminations due to death or
permanent disability and all terminations at age 62 or older other than for
Cause), or three months after employment termination (for all other
terminations). Stock options granted since May 2013 that are vested but
unexercised at the time of employment termination remain exercisable until the
earlier of (a) the option expiration date or (b) the third anniversary of
employment termination (for terminations due to death or permanent disability
and all terminations at age 62 or older other than for Cause), or three months
after employment termination (for all other terminations). Cause
means:
●
|
fraud, misappropriation,
embezzlement or other act of material misconduct against the Company or
any of its affiliates;
|
●
|
conviction of a felony involving
a crime of moral turpitude;
|
●
|
willful and knowing violation of
any rules or regulations of any governmental or regulatory body material
to the business of the Company; or
|
●
|
substantial and willful failure
to render services in accordance with the terms of his or her employment
(other than as a result of illness, accident or other physical or mental
incapacity), provided that (i) a demand for performance of services has
been delivered to the employee in writing by the employees supervisor at
least 60 days prior to termination identifying the manner in which such
supervisor believes that the employee has failed to perform and (ii) the
employee has thereafter failed to remedy such failure to
perform.
|
Annual stock option awards granted to
Mr. Lawrie contain special exercise provisions which are described below in
connection with his employment agreement.
There are provisions in the award
agreements for all stock options and RSUs (including PSUs and Career Shares)
which require the holder of such securities to deliver to the Company an amount
in cash equal to the intrinsic value of the securities on the date (the
Realization Date) they had vested (in the case of RSUs or restricted stock) or
were exercised (in the case of stock options) if the holder:
●
|
competes with the Company after
voluntary termination of employment and prior to six months after the
Realization Date, or
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
77
|
Table of Contents
●
|
solicits the Companys customers
or solicits for hire or hires the Companys employees, or discloses the
Companys confidential information, after voluntary or involuntary
termination of employment and prior to one year after a Realization
Date.
|
These forfeiture provisions do not
apply if there has been a Change in Control within three years prior to the
employment termination date. In addition, the Company has entered into
Non-Competition Agreements with all members of senior management.
Employment Agreement with Mr.
Lawrie
. The Company and Mr. Lawrie entered
into an employment agreement that is described above under Contracts and
Agreements. In the event that Mr. Lawrie is terminated by the Company without
cause or if he resigns from the Company for good reason (as each such term
is defined in the employment agreement and collectively referred to as a
Qualifying Termination), he will receive the following payments under the
terms of the agreement:
●
|
a pro-rata annual bonus (EICP)
for the year in which the termination occurs, based on the Companys
actual performance for the entire fiscal year, payable at the time annual
bonuses are generally paid (the Pro-Rata
Bonus);
|
●
|
a severance payment equal to two
times the sum of Mr. Lawries (A) base salary and (B) target annual bonus
(EICP), payable in twenty-four equal monthly installments following Mr.
Lawries termination;
|
●
|
COBRA premiums for a period of
eighteen months following termination.
|
In the event of a Qualifying
Termination prior to April 1, 2017, any then-vested stock options will remain
exercisable for the lesser of two years following the date of termination or the
expiration of their original terms. The employment agreement also provides that
upon the termination of Mr. Lawries employment due to death or disability, he
will be eligible to receive a Pro-Rata Bonus, which would have equaled the same
amount as his actual Fiscal 2016 EICP payment as shown on the Summary
Compensation Table had Mr. Lawrie terminated employment due to death or
disability on April 1, 2016.
The severance benefits described above
are subject to Mr. Lawries continued compliance with certain restrictive
covenants as set forth in the employment agreement and the non-competition
agreement described above and, in the event of a Qualifying Termination that is
not in connection with a Change in Control, the execution and non-revocation of
a release of claims against the Company and certain related parties.
There will be a six-month delay in
payments and benefits provided under the employment agreement following certain
terminations of Mr. Lawries employment if such payments and benefits are
determined to be subject to the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code at the time of termination. The employment agreement provides for
the crediting of earnings during any such payment or benefits delay
period.
78
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of
Contents
PROPOSAL 2 - ADVISORY VOTE
APPROVING
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In accordance with Section 14A of the
Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders the opportunity to approve, on a
nonbinding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as
disclosed in this proxy statement. We urge the stockholders to read the CD&A
appearing elsewhere in this proxy statement, as well as the 2016 Summary
Compensation Table and related compensation tables and narrative, which provide
detailed information on our compensation policies and practices and our named
executive officers compensation. As disclosed in the CD&A, the Companys
compensation programs focus on aligning pay to performance.
We believe that the information
provided in this proxy statement demonstrates that our compensation policies and
practices are aligned with our stockholders interests and reward our named
executive officers for performance. We are therefore asking our stockholders to
approve the following advisory resolution at the 2016 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders:
RESOLVED, that the stockholders of
Computer Sciences Corporation approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of
the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Computer Sciences Corporation
2016 definitive proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K,
including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and the
accompanying footnotes and narratives.
The vote on the compensation of our
named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement is advisory, and
therefore not binding on the company, the Compensation Committee or our Board.
Our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders
and, to the extent there is any significant vote against the NEO compensation as
disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our stockholders concerns
and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary
to address those concerns. We have determined that our stockholders should cast
an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers on an
annual basis. Unless this policy changes, the next advisory vote on the
compensation of our named executive officers will be at the 2017 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders. The affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast is required to
approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers,
as disclosed in the Companys proxy statement pursuant to the compensation
disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,
the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and
disclosure.
The Board of Directors recommends a
vote FOR the approval of the advisory resolution on
executive
compensation.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
79
|
Table of
Contents
PROPOSAL 3 - RATIFICATION OF
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention
and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to
audit the Companys financial statements. The Audit Committee has appointed
Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Companys independent registered public
accounting firm for Fiscal Year 2017. Deloitte & Touche LLP, or one of its
predecessor firms, have been retained as the Companys independent registered
public accounting firm continuously since 1962.
The Audit Committee is responsible for
approving the audit fee of the independent registered public accounting firm. In
order to assure continuing auditor independence, the Audit Committee
periodically considers whether there should be a regular rotation of the
independent registered public accounting firm. Further, in conjunction with the
mandated rotation of the independent registered public accounting firms lead
engagement partner, the Audit Committee and its Chair will continue to be
directly involved in the selection of the new lead engagement partner. The
members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued
retention of Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and
its stockholders.
The Audit Committee has recommended
that the stockholders ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm for Fiscal Year
2017.
We expect that a representative of
Deloitte & Touche LLP will attend the Annual Meeting. He will have an
opportunity to make a statement, if desired, and will be available to respond to
appropriate questions.
Fees
The following table summarizes the
aggregate fees billed by the Companys principal accounting firm, Deloitte &
Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective
affiliates, which include Deloitte Consulting, for services provided during the
last two fiscal years:
|
|
FY2016
|
|
FY2015
|
Audit
Services
1
|
|
$
|
12,722,000
|
|
$
|
14,531,000
|
Audit-Related
Services
2
|
|
|
3,325,000
|
|
|
3,535,000
|
Tax
Services
3
|
|
|
1,755,000
|
|
|
1,076,000
|
Other Services
4
|
|
|
4,307,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,109,000
|
|
$
|
19,142,000
|
____________________
1.
|
|
Includes fees associated with the
audit of our consolidated annual financial statements, review of our
consolidated interim financial statements, statutory audits of
international subsidiaries and the audit of our internal control over
financial reporting.
|
|
2.
|
|
Consists primarily of fees for a
carve-out audit of the U.S. public sector business and related accounting
research and consultations.
|
|
3.
|
|
Consists of fees for tax
compliance and consultation, and expatriate tax services.
|
|
4.
|
|
Consists primarily of advisory
services to analyze and provide advice and recommendations with respect to
third party IT and other vendor contracts in connection with the
separation of the U.S. public sector
business.
|
80
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of
Contents
Pre-Approval Policy
The Audit Committee pre-approves all
audit, audit-related and tax and all other services to be provided by the
independent auditors. The Committee has delegated to its Chairman the authority
to pre-approve services to be provided by the independent auditors. The Chairman
reports each such pre-approval decision to the full Audit Committee at its next
scheduled meeting. All services performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP for
fiscal years 2016 and 2015 were approved in accordance with the Audit
Committees pre-approval guidelines.
Vote Required
A majority of the votes cast at the
Annual Meeting is necessary for the approval of this proposal.
The Board of Directors recommends a
vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as
independent auditors for Fiscal Year 2017.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
81
|
Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 4 - APPROVAL
OF AMENDMENT TO 2011 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
In 2011, the Board adopted and the
stockholders approved the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Plan), which
authorized the issuance of up to 11,000,000 shares of CSC stock pursuant to
equity incentives granted to employees. In 2013, the Board adopted and the
stockholders approved an increase in the number of shares authorized for
issuance under the plan from 11,000,000 to 19,300,000. In November 2015, the
Board adjusted the number of shares available for issuance under the Plan from
19,300,000 to 20,257,470 to reflect the adjustment to the number of shares
subject to certain outstanding awards under the Incentive Plan at the time of
the Separation. We have granted 15,527,746 shares under the 2011 Plan in the
form of stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs) since the plans
adoption.
On May 17, 2016, the Board approved on
recommendation of the Compensation Committee an increase of 7,250,000 in the
number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan, from 20,257,470 to
27,507,470. The Board believes that this share reserve should be sufficient for
a period of one to two years.
The Plan, as amended and restated, is
attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement. The following summary of the
plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the amended
Plan.
Summary of the Plan
The following is a brief summary of the
material features of the Plan.
Eligibility
All CSC employees are eligible for
awards under the Plan. As of April 1, 2016, there were approximately 59,000
employees, and approximately 818 employees who were actually participating in
the Plan.
Administration
The Plan is administered by our
Compensation Committee, except as otherwise provided with respect to actions or
determinations by our Board.
Types of Awards
Options to purchase shares of common
stock, stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted stock, RSUs and cash
awards may be granted under the Plan. Awards may be structured as performance
awards subject to the attainment of one or more performance goals. Performance
awards may be in the form of performance based RSUs or performance units,
restricted stock, options, SARs or cash awards.
The per share exercise price of an
option cannot be less than the fair market value per share of the common stock
on the date of grant. Options and SARs must have fixed terms no longer than ten
years. Options may be granted as incentive stock options under Section 422 of
the Internal Revenue Code or nonqualified stock options. Options may not include
provisions that reload the option upon exercise.
Repricing and
Exchanges
Repricing of options and SARs and the
cancellation of options and SARs in exchange for cash or other awards or options
or SARs having a lower exercise price is prohibited under the Plan without
approval of our stockholders.
82
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Vesting Limitations
Any restricted stock, RSU, option or
SAR (an award) that is not a performance award generally must have a minimum
vesting period of three years. Any performance award generally must have a
performance period of not less than three years. Earlier vesting of awards may
occur in the events of death, disability, change in control, retirement,
involuntary termination without cause or voluntary termination for good reason
and to the extent provided for in an employees employment agreement that was
effective prior to the effective date of the Plan. Vesting of options and SARs
may occur incrementally over the three-year restricted period or three-year
performance period, as applicable. However, 1,375,374 or five percent of the
total number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the Plan
will not be subject to the minimum restricted period or performance period, as
applicable that is described above.
Shares Reserved
The Plan currently provides that the
number of shares of common stock as to which awards may be granted is 27,507,470
shares, which is referred to as the Maximum Share Limit. Under the terms of the
amended Plan, no more than 27,507,470 shares may be used for options and stock
appreciation rights (the Option/SAR Limit) and no more than 13,753,735 shares
may be used for awards other than options and stock appreciation rights (the
Full Value Award Limit).
Each Option and SAR granted shall
reduce each of the Maximum Share Limit and the Option/SAR Limit by one share and
the Full Value Award Limit by one-half share; and each Award other than an
Option or SAR granted shall reduce each of the Maximum Share Limit and the
Options/SAR Limit by two shares and the Full Value Award Limit by one share.
Awards only settled in cash will not reduce the maximum share limit under the
Plan.
If an award expires or is terminated,
cancelled or forfeited, the shares of common stock associated with the expired,
terminated, cancelled or forfeited award will again be available for awards
under the Plan. In the case of an Award other than an Option or SAR that
expires, terminates, is cancelled or is forfeited, the Maximum Share Limit and
the Option/SAR Limit shall each be increased by two shares of Common Stock, and
the Full Value Award Limit shall be increased by one share of Common stock for
each such Award that is not an Option or SAR. In the case of an Option or SAR
that expires, terminates, is cancelled or is forfeited, the Maximum Share Limit
and Option/SAR Limit shall each be increased by one share of Common Stock and
the Full Value Award Limit shall be increased by one-half share for each such
Option or SAR. However, the following shares of common stock will not become
available again for issuance under the Plan:
●
|
Shares of common stock that are
tendered by a participant or withheld as full or partial payment of
minimum withholding taxes or as payment for the exercise price of an
award; and
|
●
|
Shares of common stock reserved
for issuance upon grant of an SAR, to the extent the number of reserved
shares of common stock exceeds the number of shares of common stock
actually issued upon exercise or settlement of such SAR.
|
If cash is issued in lieu of shares of
common stock pursuant to an award, the shares will not become available for
issuance under the Plan.
Award Limits
Under the Plan, no employee may be
granted, in any fiscal year period: options or SARs that are exercisable for
more than 1,000,000 shares of common stock; stock awards covering more than
1,000,000 shares of common stock; or cash awards or RSUs that may be settled
solely in cash having a value greater than $10,000,000.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
83
|
Table of Contents
Adjustments
The Plan provides for appropriate
adjustments in the number of shares of common stock subject to awards and
available for future awards, the exercise price of outstanding awards, as well
as the maximum award limits under the Plan, in the event of changes in our
outstanding common stock by reason of a merger, stock split, reorganization,
recapitalization or similar events.
Award Agreements
Each award granted under the Plan will
be evidenced by an agreement that contains such additional terms and conditions
not inconsistent with the Plan as may be determined by the Compensation
Committee in its sole discretion. Such terms and conditions may include, among
other things, the date of grant, the number of shares covered by the award or
the cash amount of the award, the purchase or exercise price per share, the
treatment upon a termination of employment of a participant, the means of
payment for the shares, the purchase or exercise period and the terms and
conditions of purchase or exercise, if applicable. No awards will provide any
right to continued employment.
Dividends
The Compensation Committee may include
provisions in stock awards for the payment or crediting of dividends or dividend
equivalents upon vesting of the award. No dividends or dividend equivalents will
be paid on unvested stock, RSU or performance unit awards prior to
vesting.
Performance Awards
Any award available under the Plan may
be structured as a performance award. Performance awards not intended to qualify
as qualified performance-based compensation under Internal Revenue Code Section
162(m) will be based on achievement of such goals and will be subject to such
terms, conditions and restrictions as the Compensation Committee will
determine.
Performance awards granted under the
Plan that are intended to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation
Internal Revenue under Code Section 162(m) will be paid, vested or otherwise
deliverable solely on account of the attainment of one or more pre-established,
objective performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. One or
more of such goals may apply to the employee, one or more of our operating
units, divisions or sectors, or our entire company, and if so desired by the
Compensation Committee, by comparison with a peer group of companies including
by direct reference to peers, by reference to an index, or by a similar
mechanism. Performance awards may be based on any one or more of the following
measures:
●
|
contract
awards;
|
●
|
backlog;
|
●
|
market share;
|
●
|
revenue;
|
●
|
sales;
|
●
|
days sales
outstanding;
|
●
|
overhead;
|
●
|
other expense
management;
|
●
|
operating income;
|
●
|
operating income
margin;
|
●
|
earnings (including net
earnings, EBT, EBIT and EBITDA);
|
●
|
earnings margin;
|
●
|
earnings per
share;
|
●
|
cash flow;
|
●
|
working capital;
|
●
|
book value per
share;
|
●
|
improvement in capital
structure;
|
●
|
credit
rating;
|
84
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
●
|
return on stockholders
equity;
|
●
|
return on
investment;
|
●
|
cash flow return on
investment;
|
●
|
return on assets
|
●
|
total stockholder
return;
|
●
|
economic profit;
|
●
|
stock price
|
●
|
total contract value;
or
|
●
|
annual contract
value.
|
The Compensation Committee may provide
in any particular performance award agreement that any evaluation of performance
may include or exclude any of the following events that occurs during a
performance period: (i) asset write-downs, (ii) litigation or claim judgments or
settlements, (iii) the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles, or
other laws or provisions affecting reported results, (iv) any reorganization and
restructuring programs, (v) extraordinary nonrecurring items as described in
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 and/or in managements discussion and
analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing in the
annual report to stockholders for the applicable year, (vi) acquisitions or
divestitures, (vii) foreign exchange gains and losses and (viii) settlement of
hedging activities. Awards that are intended to qualify as qualified
performance-based awards may not be adjusted upward. The Compensation Committee
may retain the discretion to adjust any performance awards downward, either on a
formula or discretionary basis or any combination, as the Compensation Committee
determines.
Change in Control
Unless (i) an award agreement provides
otherwise or (ii) the agreement effectuating a change in control provides for
the assumption or substitution of awards, upon the date of a change in
control:
●
|
all outstanding options that have
not vested in full shall be fully vested and exercisable;
|
●
|
all restrictions applicable to
outstanding restricted stock will lapse in full;
|
●
|
all outstanding restricted stock
units that have not vested in full will be fully vested;
and
|
●
|
all performance awards will be
considered earned and payable at their target value and prorated (if the
change in control occurs during the performance period), and will be
immediately paid or settled.
|
Assignability and
Transfer
Generally, no award under the Plan will
be assignable or otherwise transferable except by will or the laws of descent
and distribution or pursuant to a domestic relations order issued by a court of
competent jurisdiction.
Award Termination; Forfeiture;
Disgorgement
The Compensation Committee will have
full power and authority to determine whether, to what extent and under what
circumstances any award will be terminated, or forfeited or the participant
should be required to disgorge the gains attributable to the award. In addition,
awards will be subject to any recoupment or clawback policy adopted by, or
applicable to, us.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
85
|
Table of Contents
Duration; Plan
Amendments
The Plan will expire on August 13,
2023. The Board may at any time amend, modify, suspend or terminate the Plan
(and the Compensation Committee may amend or modify an award agreement) but in
doing so cannot adversely affect any outstanding award without the participants
written consent or make any amendment to the Plan without stockholder approval,
if stockholder approval is otherwise required by applicable legal
requirements.
Material Federal Income Tax
Consequences of Awards Under the Plan
The following summary is based on
current interpretations of existing federal income tax laws. The discussion
below is not purported to be complete, and it does not discuss payroll taxes,
the tax consequences arising in the context of the participants death or the
income tax laws of any local, state or foreign country in which a participants
income or gain may be taxable.
Stock Options
Some of the options issuable under the
Plan may constitute incentive stock options, while other options granted under
the Plan may be nonqualified stock options. The Internal Revenue Code provides
for special tax treatment of stock options qualifying as incentive stock
options, which may be more favorable to employees than the tax treatment
accorded nonqualified stock options. On grant of either form of option, the
optionee will not recognize income for tax purposes, and we will not receive any
deduction. Generally, on the exercise of an incentive stock option, the optionee
will recognize no income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, the
difference between the exercise price of the incentive stock option and the fair
market value of the shares at the time of exercise is included in the
participants income when computing alternative minimum taxable income, which
may require payment of an alternative minimum tax. On the sale of shares of
common stock acquired by exercise of an incentive stock option (assuming that
the sale does not occur within two years of the date of grant of the option or
within one year of the date of exercise), any gain will be taxed to the optionee
as long-term capital gain. If the incentive stock option shares are sold before
the expiration of these holding periods, the optionee recognizes ordinary income
at the time of disposition equal to the excess if any, of the lesser of (1) the
aggregate fair market value of the shares at the date of exercise and (2) the
amount received for the shares in the sale, over the aggregate exercise price
previously paid by the optionee. Any gain or loss recognized on such a premature
disposition of the shares in excess of the amount treated as ordinary income is
treated as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on how long
the shares were held by the optionee before the sale.
On the exercise of a nonqualified
option, the optionee generally recognizes taxable income (subject to
withholding) in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value
of the shares of common stock acquired on the date of exercise and the exercise
price. On any sale of those shares by the optionee, any difference between the
sale price and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise of
the nonqualified option will be treated generally as capital gain or loss. No
deduction is available to us on the exercise of an incentive stock option
(although a deduction may be available if the employee sells the shares acquired
on exercise before the applicable holding periods noted above expire). On
exercise of a nonqualified stock option, we generally are entitled to a
deduction in an amount equal to the income recognized by the employee. Except in
the case of the death or disability of an optionee, an optionee has three months
after termination of employment in which to exercise an incentive stock option
and retain favorable tax treatment on exercise. An incentive stock option
exercised more than three months after an optionees termination of employment
other than due to the death or disability of an optionee cannot qualify for the
tax treatment accorded incentive stock options. Any such option would be treated
as a nonqualified stock option for tax purposes.
86
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Stock Appreciation
Rights
The amount of any cash or the fair
market value of any shares of common stock received by the holder on the
exercise of SARs in excess of the exercise price will be subject to ordinary
income tax in the year of receipt, and we generally will be entitled to a
deduction for that amount.
Restricted Stock
Generally, a grant of shares of common
stock under the Plan subject to vesting and transfer restrictions will not
result in taxable income to the participant for federal income tax purposes or a
tax deduction to us at the time of grant. The value of the shares will generally
be taxable to the participant as compensation income in the year in which the
restrictions on the shares lapse. Such value will be the fair market value of
the shares as to which the restrictions lapse on the date those restrictions
lapse. Any participant, however, may elect pursuant to Internal Revenue Code
Section 83(b) to treat the fair market value of the restricted shares on the
date of grant as compensation income in the year of grant, provided the
participant makes the election pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 83(b)
within 30 days after the date of grant. In any case, we generally will receive a
deduction for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of compensation
included in the participants income in the year in which that amount is so
included.
Restricted Stock
Units
A grant of a right to receive shares of
common stock or cash in lieu of the shares will result in taxable income for
federal income tax purposes to the participant at the time the award is settled
in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares or the amount of cash
awarded. We generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction at such
times for the amount included in the participants income.
Performance Units
The amount of any cash or the fair
market value of any shares of common stock received by the holder on the
settlement of performance units under the Plan will be subject to ordinary
income tax in the year of receipt, and we will be entitled to a deduction for
that amount in the year in which that amount is included.
Cash Awards
Cash awards under the Plan are taxable
income to the participant for federal income tax purposes at the time of
payment. The participant will have compensation income equal to the amount of
cash paid, and we generally will have a corresponding deduction for federal
income tax purposes.
Basis; Gain
A participants tax basis in vested
shares of common stock issued under the Plan is equal to the sum of the price
paid for the shares, if any, and the amount of ordinary income recognized by the
participant on the transfer or vesting of the shares. The participants holding
period for purposes of calculating gain upon disposition of the shares generally
begins on the later of the transfer or vesting of the shares, unless the
participant files an election under Internal Revenue Code Section 83(b) within
30 days after the date of grant of restricted stock. If a participant files an
election under Internal Revenue Code Section 83(b) within 30 days after the date
of grant of restricted stock, the holding period begins on the date of grant. If
a participant sells shares, any difference between the amount realized in the
sale and the participants tax basis in the shares is taxed as long-term or
short-term capital gain or loss (provided the shares are held as a capital asset
on the date of sale), depending on the participants holding period for the
shares.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
87
|
Table of Contents
Certain Tax Internal Revenue Code
Limitations on Deductibility
In order for us to deduct the amounts
described above, such amounts must constitute reasonable compensation for
services rendered or to be rendered and must be ordinary and necessary business
expenses. The ability to obtain a deduction for awards under the Plan could also
be limited by Internal Revenue Code Section 280G, which provides that certain
excess parachute payments made in connection with a change in control of an
employer are not deductible.
The ability to obtain a deduction for
awards under the Plan could also be limited by Internal Revenue Code Section
162(m), which limits the deductibility, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, of
compensation paid to certain employees to $1 million during any taxable year.
However, certain exceptions apply to this limitation in the case of qualified
performance-based compensation. It is intended that the approval of the Plan by
our stockholders will satisfy the stockholder approval requirement for the
qualified performance-based exception and we will be able to comply with the
requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulation Section 1.162-27 as they relate to the grant and payment of certain qualified
performance-based awards (including options and SARs) under the Plan so as to be
eligible for the qualified performance-based exception. In certain cases, we may
determine it is in our interests to not satisfy the requirements for the
qualified performance-based exception.
Internal Revenue Code Section
409A
Internal Revenue Code Section 409A
generally provides that deferred compensation subject to Internal Revenue Code
Section 409A that does not meet the requirements for an exemption from Internal
Revenue Code Section 409A must satisfy specific requirements, both in operation
and in form, including: (i) the timing of payment; (ii) the election of
deferrals; and (iii) restrictions on the acceleration of payment. Failure to
comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A may result in the early taxation
(plus interest) to the participant of deferred compensation and the imposition
of a 20% penalty on the participant of the deferred amounts included in the
participants income.
Benefits Granted Under the 2011
Incentive Plan
The number and type of awards that will
be granted under the Plan are not determinable at this time as the Compensation
Committee or the full board of directors, as applicable, will make these
determinations in its sole discretion. However, as of April 1, 2016, all current
executive officers as a group held 1,857,308 stock options and 1,169,179 RSUs
under the Plan. No associates of such executive officers have received stock
options or RSUs under the Plan. All employees as a group had 4,827,154 stock
options and cash-settled stock appreciation rights and 3,400,497 RSUs
outstanding under the Plan. Non-employee directors are not eligible to
participate in the Plan.
Other Information
The following table gives information
about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as
of April 1, 2016. See Note 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K for information
regarding the material features of these plans.
88
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
securities
|
|
securities
to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available
for
|
|
be issued
upon
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
future issuance
under
|
|
exercise
of
|
|
exercise price
|
|
equity
compensation
|
|
outstanding
|
|
of outstanding
|
|
plans
(excluding
|
|
options,
warrants
|
|
options, warrants
|
|
securities reflected
in
|
Plan
Category
|
and rights
(a)
|
|
and rights (b)
|
|
column (a))
(c)
|
Equity compensation plans
approved
|
|
|
|
|
|
by security
holders
|
9,053,666
|
|
|
$
|
24.83
|
|
|
10,421,376
1
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approved
by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
9,053,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,421,376
|
____________________
1.
|
Includes 3,000 shares available
for future issuance under the 2006 Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan.
This plan permits shares to be issued pursuant to stock options,
restricted stock, and RSUs. Includes 121,936 shares available for future
issuance under the 2010 Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan. This plan
permits shares to be issued pursuant to RSUs and restricted
stock.
|
|
|
Includes 2,073,268 shares
available for future issuance under the 2007 Incentive Plan. This plan
permits shares to be issued pursuant to stock options, restricted stock or
RSUs, or pursuant to performance awards payable in shares of CSC stock,
restricted stock, RSUs or any combination of the foregoing. Of the shares
available for issuance under the 2007 plan, 2,073,268 shares are available
for future grant as stock options with each option granted counted as one
share against the available shares under such plan or assuming no options
are granted, 1,036,634 shares are available for future awards of
restricted stock or RSUs, after giving effect to the requirement set forth
in the 2007 plan that a grant of one share of restricted stock or one RSU
be counted as two shares against the available shares under such
plan.
|
|
|
Includes 8,223,712 shares
available for future granting under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan. This
plan permits shares to be issued pursuant to stock options, restricted
stock or RSUs, or pursuant to performance awards payable in shares of CSC
stock, restricted stock, RSUs or any combination of the foregoing. Of the
shares available for issuance under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan,
8,223,712 shares are available for future grant as stock options with each
option granted counted as one share against the available shares under
such plan or assuming no options are granted, 4,111,856 shares are
available for future awards of restricted stock or RSUs, after giving
effect to the requirement set forth in the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan
that a grant of one share of restricted stock or one RSU be counted as two
shares against the available shares under such
plan.
|
Vote Required
A majority of the votes cast at the
Annual Meeting is necessary for the approval of this proposal.
The Board of Directors recommends a
vote FOR the approval of the amendment to the 2011
Omnibus Incentive Plan to
increase the number of shares authorized for issuance
under the plan by an
additional 7,250,000 shares.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
89
|
Table of Contents
PROPOSAL 5 -
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO 2010 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR INCENTIVE
PLAN
In 2010, the Board adopted and the
stockholders approved the 2010 Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan (the 2010
Director Plan), which authorized the issuance of up to 150,000 shares of CSC
stock pursuant to equity incentives granted to non-employee directors. In 2013,
the Board adopted and the stockholders approved an increase in the number of
shares authorized for issuance under the plan from 150,000 to 300,000. We have
granted 192,888 shares under the 2010 Director Plan in the form of restricted
stock units (RSUs) since the plans adoption.
On May 17, 2016, the Board approved on
recommendation of the Compensation Committee an amendment to the 2010 Director
Plan increasing the number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan from
300,000 to 800,000. The Board believes that this share reserve should be
sufficient for a period of four years, taking into account the potential
addition of new board members and grant increases over at least that
period.
The 2010 Director Plan, as amended and
restated, is attached as Appendix C to this Proxy Statement. The following
summary of the plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text
of the amended 2010 Director Plan.
Shares Available for
Issuance
If the stockholders approve this
Proposal 5, the maximum number of shares of CSC stock that may be issued
pursuant to awards granted under the amended 2010 Director Plan will be 800,000,
subject to certain adjustments for corporate transactions, as described in
Adjustments below. Shares of CSC stock issued under the 2010 Director Plan may
consist of newly issued shares, treasury shares and/or shares purchased in the
open market or otherwise. Only shares of CSC stock actually issued pursuant to
awards granted under the 2010 Director Plan will be counted against the
authorized shares. If an award is settled or terminates by expiration,
forfeiture, cancellation or otherwise without the issuance of all shares
originally covered by the award, then the shares not issued will again be
available for use under the 2010 Director Plan.
Eligibility
Each CSC director who is not an
employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries is eligible for the grant of
awards under the 2010 Director Plan. As of April 1, 2016, there were eight
non-employee directors.
Administration
The 2010 Director Plan will be
administered by the Board or, in the Boards discretion, a committee of the
Board consisting of three or more directors, each of whom is:
●
|
independent for purposes of
CSCs Corporate Governance Guidelines; and
|
●
|
a non-employee director for
purposes of SEC Rule 16b-3(b)(3).
|
The administrator of the 2010 Director
Plan (the Administrator) will have full and final authority to select the
non-employee directors to whom awards will be granted under the 2010 Director
Plan, to grant awards and to determine the terms and conditions of those
awards.
90
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Types of Awards
The 2010 Director Plan provides for the
grant of:
●
|
restricted stock;
and
|
●
|
RSUs
|
Subject to the 2010 Director Plan, the
Administrator will determine the terms and conditions of each award, which will
be set forth in an award agreement executed by CSC and the
participant.
Restricted Stock
and Restricted Stock Units
.
The 2010 Director Plan
authorizes the Administrator to grant awards of restricted stock and RSUs with
time-based vesting. An RSU represents the right to receive a specified number of
shares of CSC stock, or cash based on the market value of those shares, upon
vesting or at a later date permitted in the award agreement. The terms and
conditions of the restricted stock and RSUs will be determined by the
Administrator, subject to the requirements of the 2010 Director Plan. Among
those requirements are the following:
●
|
Unless the Administrator
determines otherwise, all restricted stock will have full voting
rights;
|
●
|
Rights to dividends or dividend
equivalents may be extended to and made part of any award of restricted
stock or RSUs, subject to such terms, conditions and restrictions as the
Administrator may establish; and
|
●
|
The Administrator may also
establish rules and procedures for the crediting of interest on deferred
cash payments.
|
Transferability
Unless the Administrator determines
otherwise, no award, and no shares of CSC stock subject to an outstanding award
as to which any applicable restriction or deferral period has not lapsed, may be
sold or transferred except by will or the laws of descent and
distribution.
Change in Control
Unless an award agreement specifies
otherwise, upon the date of a change in control of CSC (as such term is defined
under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code):
●
|
all restrictions applicable to
outstanding restricted stock will lapse in full; and
|
●
|
all outstanding RSUs will become
fully vested.
|
Adjustments
If there is a reorganization, merger,
consolidation, recapitalization, restructuring, reclassification, dividend
(other than a regular, quarterly cash dividend) or other distribution, stock
split, reverse stock split or similar transaction, or a sale of substantially
all of CSCs assets, then, unless the terms of the transaction provide otherwise
and the outstanding shares of CSC common stock are increased, decreased or
exchanged for or converted into cash, property and/or a different number or kind
of securities (or if cash, property, and/or securities are distributed in
respect of such shares), the Administrator will make such adjustments as it
deems appropriate and proportionate in:
●
|
the number and type of shares,
cash or property subject to outstanding awards granted under the 2010
Director Plan, and the exercise or purchase price per share;
and
|
●
|
the maximum number and type of
shares authorized for issuance under the 2010 Director
Plan.
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
91
|
Table of Contents
Plan Amendments
The Board of Directors may amend or
terminate all or any part of the 2010 Director Plan at any time and in any
manner, subject to the following:
●
|
CSC stockholders must approve any
amendment or termination if (i) stockholder approval is required by the
SEC, NYSE or any taxing authority, or (ii) the amendment or termination
would materially increase the benefits accruing to non-employee directors
or the maximum number of shares which may be issued under the 2010
Director Plan, or materially modify the 2010 Director Plans eligibility
requirements; and
|
●
|
Non-employee directors must
consent to any amendment or termination that would impair their rights
under outstanding awards.
|
The Administrator may amend the terms
of any outstanding award, but no such amendment may impair the rights of any
non-employee director without his or her consent.
Plan
Duration
.
No award may be granted
under the 2010 Director Plan after May 13, 2023, but any award granted prior to
that date may extend beyond that date.
New Plan
Benefits
.
Because benefits under the
2010 Director Plan will depend on the Administrators actions and the fair
market value of CSC stock at various future dates, it is not possible to
determine the benefits that will be received by non-employee directors if the
2010 Director Plan is approved by CSC stockholders. As of April 1, 2016, all
non-employee directors as a group held in the aggregate 49,740 RSUs under the
2010 Director Plan.
Federal Income Tax
Treatment
The following is a brief description of
the principal effect of U.S. federal income taxation upon a non-employee
director and CSC with respect to the grant and settlement of awards under the
2010 Director Plan, based on U.S. federal income tax laws in effect on the date
hereof. The following is only a summary and therefore is not complete, does not
discuss the income tax laws of any state or foreign country in which a
non-employee director may reside, and is subject to change.
Restricted
Stock
.
Pursuant to the 2010 Director
Plan, non-employee directors may be granted restricted stock. Unless the
non-employee director makes a timely election under Section 83(b) of the
Internal Revenue Code, he or she will generally not recognize any taxable income
until the restrictions on the shares expire or are removed, at which time the
non-employee director will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the
excess of the fair market value of the shares at that time over the purchase
price for the restricted shares, if any. If the non-employee director makes an
election under Section 83(b) within 30 days after the date of grant of the
restricted stock, he or she will recognize ordinary income on the date of grant
equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. CSC will
generally be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income
recognized by the non-employee director.
Restricted Stock
Units
.
Pursuant to the 2010 Director Plan, non-employee directors may be granted
RSUs. The grant of an RSU is generally not a taxable event for the non-employee
director. In general, the non-employee director will not recognize any taxable
income until the shares of CSC stock subject to the RSU (or cash equal to the
value of such shares) are distributed to him or her without any restrictions, at
which time the non-employee director will recognize ordinary income equal to the
fair market value of the shares (or cash) at that time. CSC will generally be
entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the
non-employee director.
92
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Section 409A
Awards made under the 2010 Director
Plan are intended to comply with or be exempt from Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code. If any provision or award under the 2010 Director Plan would
result in the imposition of an additional tax under Section 409A, that Plan
provision or award will be reformed to avoid imposition of the additional tax
and no action taken to comply with Section 409A shall be deemed to adversely
affect the non-employee directors rights to an award.
Other Information
See information about our common stock
that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of April 1, 2016 under
Other Information on page 94 above.
Vote Required
A majority of the votes cast at the
Annual Meeting is necessary for the approval of this proposal, provided that the
number of votes cast is greater than 50% of the total outstanding shares of the
common stock.
The Board of Directors recommends a
vote FOR approval of the Amendment of the 2010
Non-Employee Director
Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for
issuance under
the plan by an additional 500,000 shares.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
93
|
Table of Contents
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
requires CSC directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10%
of the CSC stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports
of changes in ownership of CSC stock and other equity securities of the Company.
Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by
SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they
file.
To our knowledge, based solely on a
review of information furnished to us, reports filed through us and
representations that no other reports were required, all of our executive
officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners filed the reports
required under Section 16(a) on a timely basis, except that Mr. Mahadwar and Mr.
Lawande each reported one transaction late.
Business for 2017 Annual
Meeting
Stockholder
Proposals
.
For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in CSCs proxy
statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the written proposal must
be received by CSCs Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices not
later than February 24, 2017. If the date of next years annual meeting is moved
more than 30 days before or after the anniversary date of this years annual
meeting, then the deadline for inclusion of a stockholder proposal in CSCs
proxy statement is instead a reasonable time before CSC begins to print and mail
its proxy materials. The proposal must comply with the requirements of SEC Rule
14a-8 regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored
proxy materials. Proposals should be addressed to:
Corporate
Secretary
CSC
1775 Tysons
Boulevard
Tysons, Virginia 22102
Facsimile: (703) 991-0430
Stockholders seeking to nominate
directors at the 2017 Annual Meeting or who wish to bring a proposal before the
meeting that is not intended to be included in CSCs proxy statement for the
2017 Annual Meeting must comply with the advance notice deadlines contained in
CSCs Bylaws. The Bylaws provide that any such notice must be given not later
than the close of business on the 90th day and not earlier than the close of
business on the 120th day prior to the anniversary date of the preceding years
annual meeting. In addition, the Bylaws specify that in the event that the date
of the upcoming annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days
after the anniversary date of the previous years annual meeting, notice by the
stockholder to be timely must be received not earlier than the close of business
on the 120th day prior to the upcoming annual meeting and not later than the
close of business on the later of (x) the 90th day prior to the upcoming annual
meeting and (y) the 10th day following the date on which public announcement of
the date of such upcoming meeting is first made. The term public announcement
means disclosure in a press release reported by the Dow Jones News Service,
Associated Press or a comparable national news service, in a document publicly
filed by CSC with the SEC, or in a notice pursuant to the applicable rules of an
exchange on which the securities of CSC are listed. For the 2017 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders, a stockholders notice, to be timely, must be delivered to, or
mailed and received at our principal executive offices:
●
|
not earlier than the close of
business on April 12, 2017; and
|
●
|
not later than the close of
business on May 12, 2017.
|
94
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Householding; Availability of 2016
Annual Report and Proxy Statement
The SEC permits the Company to deliver
a single proxy statement and annual report to an address shared by two or more
stockholders. This delivery method, referred to as householding, can result in
significant cost savings for the Company. In order to take advantage of this
opportunity, the Company, and banks and brokerage firms that hold your shares,
have delivered only one proxy statement and annual report to multiple
stockholders who share an address unless one or more of the stockholders has
provided contrary instructions. The Company will deliver promptly, upon written
or oral request, a separate copy of the proxy statement and annual report to a
stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was
delivered.
If you would like an additional copy of
the 2016 Annual Report or this proxy statement, with exhibits, these documents
are available on the Companys Website, www.csc.com, under Investor
Relations/SEC Filings. They are also available without charge to any
stockholder, upon request, by calling 703-245-9668 or writing to:
Investor Relations
CSC
1775 Tysons Boulevard
Tysons, VA 22102
If you share the same address with
other CSC stockholders and would like to start or stop householding for your
account, you can call 800.542.1061 or write to: Householding Department, 51
Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, including your name, the name of your broker
or other holder of record and your account number(s).
If you consent to householding, your
election will remain in effect until you revoke it. If you revoke your consent,
you will be sent separate copies of documents mailed at least 30 days after
receipt of your revocation.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
95
|
Table of Contents
APPENDIX A -
INDEPENDENCE STANDARDS
A director is independent if the
Board of Directors has determined that he or she has no material relationship
with Computer Sciences Corporation or any of its consolidated subsidiaries
(collectively, the Company), either directly, or as a partner, stockholder or
officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company. For
purposes of this definition, the Board has determined that a director is not
independent if:
1.
|
The director is, or has been
within the last three years, an employee of the Company, or an immediate
family member of the director is, or has been within the last three years,
an executive officer of the Company;
|
|
|
2.
|
The director has received, or has
an immediate family member who has received, during any 12-month period
during the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation
from the Company (other than Board and committee fees, and pension or
other forms of deferred compensation for prior service). Compensation
received by an immediate family member for service as an employee (other
than an executive officer) of the Company is not considered for purposes
of this standard;
|
|
3.
|
(a) The director, or an immediate
family member of the director, is a current partner of the Companys
internal or external auditor; (b) the director is a current employee of
the Companys internal or external auditor; (c) an immediate family member
of the director is a current employee of the Companys internal or
external auditor who participates in the firms audit, assurance or tax
compliance (but not tax planning) practice; or (d) the director, or an
immediate family member of the director, was within the last three years
(but is no longer) a partner or employee of the Companys internal or
external auditor and personally worked on the Companys audit within that
time;
|
|
4.
|
The director, or an immediate
family member of the director, is, or has been within the last three
years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of
the Companys present executive officers serves or served at the same time
on that companys compensation committee; or
|
|
5.
|
The director is a current
employee, or an immediate family member of the director is a current
executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received
payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount that, in
any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or
2% of the other companys consolidated gross
revenues.
|
An immediate family member includes a
directors spouse, parents, children, siblings, mother and father-in-law, sons
and daughters-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than a
domestic employee) who shares the directors home.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
A-1
|
Table of Contents
APPENDIX B -
2011 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
2011 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
Section 1
Purpose and
Objectives
This Computer Sciences Corporation 2011
Omnibus Incentive Plan (this Plan) was adopted by Computer Sciences
Corporation (the Company) to reward selected corporate officers and key
employees of the Company by enabling them to acquire shares of common stock of
the Company and/or through the provision of cash payments.
This Plan is designed to attract and
retain employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries (as defined herein), to
encourage the sense of proprietorship in the Company and its
Subsidiaries.
Section 2
Definitions
As used herein, the terms set forth
below shall have the following respective meanings:
(a)
Authorized Officer
means the Chairman
of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company or the Chief Human
Resources Officer of the Company (or any other senior officers of the Company to
whom any of such individuals shall delegate the authority to execute any Award
Agreement).
(b)
Award
means the grant of any Option,
Stock Appreciation Right, Stock Award, or Cash Award, any of which may be
structured as a Performance Award, whether granted singly, in combination or in
tandem, to a Participant pursuant to such applicable terms, conditions, and
limitations as the Committee may establish in accordance with the objectives of
this Plan.
(c)
Award Agreement
means the document
(in written or electronic form) communicating the terms, conditions and
limitations applicable to an Award. The Committee may, in its discretion,
require that the Participant execute such Award Agreement, or may provide for
procedures through which Award Agreements are made available but not executed.
Any Participant who is granted an Award and who does not affirmatively reject
the applicable Award Agreement shall be deemed to have accepted the terms of
Award as embodied in the Award Agreement.
(d)
Board
means the Board of Directors of
the Company.
(e)
Cash Award
means an Award denominated
in cash.
(f)
Change in Control
means the
consummation of a change in ownership of the Company, a change in effective
control of the Company or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion
of the assets of the Company, and in each case, as defined under Code Section
409A.
(g)
Code
means the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended from time to time.
(h)
Committee
means the Compensation
Committee of the Board, and any successor committee thereto or such other
committee of the Board as may be designated by the Board to administer this Plan
in whole or in part including any subcommittee of the Board as designated by the
Board.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
B-1
|
Table of Contents
(i)
Common Stock
means the Common Stock,
par value $1.00 per share, of the Company.
(j)
Company
means Computer Sciences
Corporation, a Nevada corporation, or any successor thereto.
(k)
Disability
means, unless otherwise
provided in an Award Agreement, a disability that entitles the Employee to
benefits under the Companys long-term disability plan, as may be in effect from
time to time, as determined by the plan administrator of the long-term
disability plan, or if the Employee is not a participant under the Companys
long-term disability plan, as determined if the Employee were a participant in a
long-term disability plan that covers similarly situated employees.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an Award is subject to Code Section 409A and
Disability is a payment event, the definition of Disability shall conform to the
requirements of Treasury Regulation § 1.409A-3(i)(4)(i).
(l)
Dividend Equivalents
means, in the
case of Restricted Stock Units or Performance Units, an amount equal to all
dividends and other distributions (or the economic equivalent thereof) that are
payable to shareholders of record during the Restriction Period or performance
period, as applicable, on a like number of shares of Common Stock that are
subject to the Award.
(m)
Effective Date
means the date this
Plan is approved by the requisite vote of the stockholders of the
Company.
(n)
Employee
means an employee of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
(o)
Exchange Act
means the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.
(p)
Exercise Price
means the price at
which a Participant may exercise his right to receive cash or Common Stock, as
applicable, under the terms of an Award.
(q)
Fair Market Value
of a share of
Common Stock means, as of a particular date, (1) if shares of Common Stock are
listed on a national securities exchange, the closing sales price per share of
Common Stock on the consolidated transaction reporting system for the principal
national securities exchange on which shares of Common Stock are listed on that
date, or, if there shall have been no such sale so reported on that date, on the
last preceding date on which such a sale was so reported, (2) if the Common
Stock is not so listed, the average of the closing bid and asked price on that
date, or, if there are no quotations available for such date, on the last
preceding date on which such quotations shall be available, as reported by an
inter-dealer quotation system, (3) if shares of Common Stock are not publicly
traded, the most recent value determined by an independent appraiser appointed
by the Committee for such purpose, or (4) if none of the above are applicable,
the fair market value of a share of Common Stock as determined in good faith by
the Committee.
(r)
Fiscal Year
means a fiscal year of
the Company.
(s)
Grant Date
means the date an Award is
granted to a Participant.
(t)
Incentive Stock Option
means an
Option that is intended to comply with the requirements set forth in Code
Section 422.
(u)
Nonqualified Stock Option
means an
Option that is not intended to comply with the requirements set forth in Code
Section 422.
(v)
Option
means a right to purchase a
specified number of shares of Common Stock at a specified Exercise Price, which
is either an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option.
(w)
Participant
means an Employee to whom
an Award has been made under this Plan.
B-2
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
(x)
Performance Award
means an Award made
pursuant to this Plan to a Participant which is subject to the attainment of one
or more Performance Goals. A Performance Award may be in the form of Performance
Unit Awards, Restricted Stock Awards, Options, SARs or Cash Awards.
(y)
Performance Goal
means one or more
standards established by the Committee to determine in whole or in part whether
a Performance Award shall be earned.
(z)
Performance Unit
means a unit
evidencing the right to receive in specified circumstances cash or shares of
Common Stock or equivalent value of Common Stock in cash, the value of which at
the time it is settled is determined as a function of the extent to which
established performance criteria have been satisfied. Performance Units may take
the form of performance-based Restricted Stock Units or Cash Awards.
(aa)
Performance Unit Award
means an Award
in the form of Performance Units.
(bb)
Qualified Performance Awards
has the
meaning set forth in Section 13.2.
(cc)
Restricted Stock
means a share of
Common Stock that is restricted or subject to forfeiture provisions.
(dd)
Restricted Stock Award
means an Award
in the form of Restricted Stock.
(ee)
Restricted Stock Unit
means a unit
evidencing the right to receive in specified circumstances one share of Common
Stock or equivalent value in cash that is restricted or subject to forfeiture
provisions.
(ff)
Restricted Stock Unit Award
means an
Award in the form of Restricted Stock Units.
(gg)
Restriction Period
means a period of
time beginning as of the date upon which a Restricted Stock Award or Restricted
Stock Unit Award is made pursuant to this Plan and ending as of the date upon
which such Award is no longer restricted or subject to forfeiture
provisions.
(hh)
Stock Appreciation Right
or
SAR
means
a right to receive a payment, in cash or Common Stock, equal to the excess of
the Fair Market Value of a specified number of shares of Common Stock on the
date the right is exercised over a specified Exercise Price.
(ii)
Stock Award
means an Award in the
form of shares of Common Stock, including a Restricted Stock Award, and a
Restricted Stock Unit Award or Performance Unit Award that may be settled in
shares of Common Stock, and excluding Options and SARs.
(jj)
Stock-Based Award Limitations
has the
meaning set forth in Section 4.3.
(kk)
Subsidiary
means any corporation,
partnership, association, joint stock company, business trust, unincorporated
organization or other entity that the Company controls directly, or indirectly
through one or more intermediaries.
Section 3
Eligibility
All Employees are eligible for Awards
under this Plan. The Committee shall determine the type or types of Awards to be
made under this Plan and shall designate from time to time the Employees who are
to be granted Awards under this Plan.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
B-3
|
Table of Contents
Section 4
Shares Subject to
Awards
4.1 Common Stock Available for
Awards.
Subject to the provisions of
Section 18 hereof, there shall be available for Awards under this Plan granted
wholly or partly in Common Stock (including rights or Options that may be
exercised for or settled in Common Stock) an aggregate of 27,507,470 shares of
Common Stock (the Maximum Share Limit), of which 7,250,000 shares were added
in 2016. Within the Maximum Share Limit,
(a) no more than 27,507,470 shares may
be used for Options and SARs (the Option and SARs Limit);
(b) no more than 13,753,735 shares may
be used for Awards other than Options and SARs (the Full Value Award Limit);
and
(c) Each Option and SAR granted shall
reduce each of the Maximum Share Limit and the Option and SARs Limit by one
share, and the Full Value Award Limit by one-half share; and each Award other
than an Option or SAR granted shall reduce each of the Maximum Share Limit and
the Option and SARs Limit by two shares, and the Full Value Award Limit by one
share.
Such shares shall be reserved from
authorized but unissued shares, treasury shares and from shares which have been
reacquired by the Company. The Board and the appropriate officers of the Company
shall from time to time take whatever actions are necessary to file any required
documents with governmental authorities, stock exchanges and transaction
reporting systems to ensure that shares of Common Stock are available for
issuance pursuant to Awards.
4.2 Share
Counting.
If an Award expires or is
terminated, cancelled or forfeited, the shares of Common Stock associated with
the expired, terminated, cancelled or forfeited Award shall again be available
for Awards under this Plan. In the case of an Award that is an Option or SAR
that expires, terminates, is cancelled or is forfeited, the Maximum Share Limit
and the Option and SARs Limit shall each be increased by one share of Common
Stock and the Full Value Award Limit shall be increased by one-half share of
Common Stock for each such Option or SAR. In the case of an Award other than an
Option or SAR that expires, terminates, is cancelled or is forfeited, the
Maximum Share Limit and the Option and SARs Limit shall each be increased by two
shares of Common Stock and the Full Value Award Limit shall be increased by one
share of Common Stock for each such Award that is not an Option or SAR.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee shall adopt such share counting
rules as are required for Incentive Stock Options to comply with the
requirements set forth in Code Section 422.
In addition, the following principles
shall apply in determining the number of shares under any applicable limit
within the Maximum Share Limit:
(a) Shares of Common Stock that are
tendered by a Participant or withheld as full or partial payment to satisfy
minimum withholding taxes shall not become available again for issuance under
this Plan;
(b) Shares of Common Stock that are
tendered by a Participant or withheld as full or partial payment for the
Exercise Price of an Award shall not become available again for issuance under
this Plan;
(c) Shares of Common Stock reserved for
issuance upon grant of an SAR, to the extent the number of reserved shares of
Common Stock exceeds the number of shares of Common Stock actually issued upon
exercise or settlement of such SAR, shall not become available again for
issuance under this Plan;
(d) Awards that by their terms may only
be settled in cash shall not reduce the Maximum Share Limit under this Plan;
and
B-4
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
(e) If cash is issued in lieu of shares
of Common Stock pursuant to an Award, such shares not become available again for
issuance under this Plan.
4.3 Fiscal Year Limitations on
Grants of Awards.
The following
limitations shall apply to any Awards made hereunder:
(a) No Employee may be granted during
any Fiscal Year Awards consisting of Options or SARs that are exercisable for
more than 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock;
(b) No Employee may be granted during
any Fiscal Year Stock Awards covering or relating to more than 1,000,000 shares
of Common Stock (the limitation set forth in this subsection (b), together with
the limitation set forth in subsection (a), being hereinafter collectively
referred to as the Stock-Based Award Limitations); and
(c) No Employee may be granted during
any Fiscal Year (1) Cash Awards or (2) Restricted Stock Unit Awards or
Performance Unit Awards that may be settled solely in cash having a value
determined on the Grant Date in excess of $10,000,000.
Section 5
Administration
5.1 Authority of the Committee;
Qualifications.
Except as otherwise
provided in this Plan with respect to actions or determinations by the Board,
this Plan shall be administered by the Committee, subject to the
following:
(a) The members of the Committee shall
satisfy any independence requirements prescribed by any stock exchange on which
the Company lists its Common Stock;
(b) Awards may be granted to
individuals who are subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act only if the
Committee is comprised solely of two or more Non-Employee Directors as defined
in Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 16b-3 (as amended from time to time,
and any successor rule, regulation or statute fulfilling the same or similar
function); and
(c) any Award intended to qualify for
the performance-based compensation exception under Code Section 162(m) shall
be granted only if the Committee is comprised solely of two or more outside
directors within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) and regulations pursuant
thereto.
5.2 Powers.
Subject to the provisions hereof, the Committee shall have
full and exclusive power and authority to administer this Plan and to take all
actions that are specifically contemplated hereby or are necessary or
appropriate in connection with the administration hereof. The Committee shall
also have full and exclusive power to interpret this Plan and to adopt such
rules, regulations and guidelines for carrying out this Plan as it may deem
necessary or proper, all of which powers shall be exercised in the best
interests of the Company and in keeping with the objectives of this
Plan.
Subject to Sections 5.4, 6.2 and 6.3
hereof, the Committee may, in its discretion,
(a) Provide for the extension of the
exercisability of an Award;
(b) In the event of death, Disability,
Change in Control, retirement, involuntary termination without cause or
voluntary termination for good reason, accelerate the vesting or exercisability
of an Award, eliminate or make less restrictive any restrictions contained in an
Award, waive any restriction or other provision of this Plan or an Award or
otherwise amend or modify an Award in any manner that is, in either case, (1)
not adverse
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
B-5
|
Table of Contents
to the Participant to whom such Award
was granted, (2) consented to by such Participant or (3) authorized by Section
18.3 hereof;
provided
,
however
, that no such action shall permit the term of any Option or
SAR to be greater than 10 years from its Grant Date; or
(c) Accelerate the vesting or
exercisability of an Award to the extent provided for in an Employees
employment agreement with the Company or any Subsidiary that was effective prior
the Effective Date.
5.3 Final and
Binding.
The Committee may correct any
defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in this Plan or in
any Award Agreement in the manner and to the extent the Committee deems
necessary or desirable to further this Plans purposes. Any decision of the
Committee in the interpretation and administration of this Plan shall lie within
its sole and absolute discretion and shall be final, conclusive and binding on
all parties concerned.
5.4 Prohibition on Repricing of
Awards.
Subject to the provisions of
Section 18 hereof, the Committee may not amend the terms of outstanding Award
Agreements without the approval of the Companys stockholders to
(a) reduce the Exercise Price of any
outstanding Options or SARs; or
(b) cancel any outstanding Options or
SARs in exchange for cash or other Awards, or Options or SARs with an Exercise
Price that is less than the Exercise Price of the original Options or
SARs.
5.5 Delegation of
Authority.
Subject to Nevada law, the
Committee may delegate any of its authority to the Board, to any other committee
of the Board or to an Authorized Officer to grant Awards to Employees who are
not subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act; provided that the requirements
of Section 5.1 are met. Such delegation shall be made in writing specifically
setting forth such delegated authority. As permitted by Nevada law, the
Committee may also delegate to an Authorized Officer authority to execute on
behalf of the Company any Award Agreement. The Committee and the Board, as
applicable, may engage or authorize the engagement of a third party
administrator to carry out administrative functions under this Plan.
Section 6
Awards
6.1 Grants.
The Committee, in its absolute discretion, may grant all
Awards under this Plan from time to time, provided however, that the Committee
shall not have the right, without the approval of the Companys stockholders,
to
(a) Reduce the Exercise price of an
existing options;
(b) Take any action which would be
treated as a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles;
or
(c) Cancel an existing option at a time
when its exercise price exceeds the fair market value of the stock underlying
such option in exchange for another option, a restricted stock award or other
equity in the Company or cash except as provided in Section 18.
6.2 Award
Agreements.
Each Award shall be embodied
in an Award Agreement, which shall contain such terms, conditions and
limitations as shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion,
and, if required by the Committee, shall be signed by the Participant to whom
the Award is granted and by an Authorized Officer for and on behalf of the
Company. Awards may consist of those listed in Sections 7 - 13 and may be
granted singly, in combination or in tandem. Awards may also be made in
combination or in tandem with, in replacement of, or as alternatives to, grants
or rights under this Plan or any other plan of the Company
B-6
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
or any of its Subsidiaries, including
the plan of any acquired entity. Upon the termination of employment by a
Participant who is an Employee, any unexercised, unvested or unpaid Awards shall
be treated as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement or in any other
written agreement the Company has entered into with the Participant.
6.3 Vesting
Limitations.
Except as otherwise provided
below, any Stock Award, Option or Stock Appreciation Right that
(a) is not a Performance Award shall
have a minimum Restriction Period of three years from the date of grant;
or
(b) is a Performance Award shall have a
minimum performance period of three years from the date of grant;
provided
,
however
,
that (1) the Committee may provide for earlier vesting (x) to the extent
provided for in an Employees employment agreement with the Company or any
Subsidiary that was effective prior the Effective Date and (y) upon an
Employees termination of employment by reason of death, Disability, Change in
Control, retirement, involuntary termination without cause or voluntary
termination for good reason and (2) vesting of a Stock Award, Option or Stock
Appreciation Right may occur incrementally over the three-year Restriction
Period or three-year minimum performance period, as applicable. The foregoing
notwithstanding, 1,375,374 of the total number of shares of Common Stock
available for issuance under this Plan may be granted without regard to any
minimum Restriction Period or performance period, as applicable, described in
this Section 6.3.
6.4 Payment of
Awards.
Payment of Awards may be made in
the form of cash or Common Stock, or a combination thereof, and may include such
restrictions as the Committee shall determine, including, but not limited to, in
the case of Common Stock, restrictions on transfer and forfeiture provisions.
For a Restricted Stock Award, the certificates evidencing the shares of such
Restricted Stock (to the extent that such shares are so evidenced) shall contain
appropriate legends and restrictions that describe the terms and conditions of
the restrictions applicable thereto. For a Restricted Stock Unit Award that may
be settled in shares of Common Stock, the shares of Common Stock that may be
issued at the end of the Restriction Period shall be evidenced by book entry
registration or in such other manner as the Committee may determine.
6.5 Dividends and Dividend
Equivalents.
Rights to dividends will be
extended to and made part of any Restricted Stock Award and Dividend Equivalents
may, in the Committees discretion, be extended to and made part of any
Restricted Stock Unit Award and Performance Unit Award, subject in each case to
such terms, conditions and restrictions as the Committee may establish;
provided
,
however
,
that no such dividends or Dividend Equivalents shall be paid with respect to
unvested Stock Awards, including Stock Awards subject to Performance Goals.
Dividends and/or Dividend Equivalents shall not be extended to any Options or
SARs.
Section 7
Options
7.1
General.
An Award may
be in the form of an Option. An Option awarded pursuant to this Plan may consist
of either an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option. The price at
which shares of Common Stock may be purchased upon the exercise of an Option
shall be not less than the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the Grant
Date. The term of an Option shall not exceed 10 years from the Grant Date.
Options may not include provisions that reload the Option upon exercise.
Subject to the foregoing provisions, the terms, conditions and limitations
applicable to any Option, including, but not limited to, the term of any Option
and the date or dates upon which the Option becomes vested and exercisable,
shall be determined by the Committee and subject to the minimum Restriction
Period and performance period requirements and any other applicable requirements
described in Section 6 hereof.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
B-7
|
Table of Contents
7.2
Option Exercise.
The
Exercise Price shall be paid in full at the time of exercise in cash or, if
permitted by the Committee and elected by the Participant, the Participant may
pay the exercise price by means of the Company withholding shares of Common
Stock otherwise deliverable on exercise of the Award or tendering Common Stock
valued at Fair Market Value on the date of exercise, or any combination thereof.
The Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine acceptable methods for
Participants to tender Common Stock. The Committee may provide for procedures to
permit the exercise or purchase of such Awards by use of the proceeds to be
received from the sale of Common Stock issuable pursuant to an Award (including
cashless exercise procedures approved by the Committee involving a broker or
dealer approved by the Committee). The Committee may adopt additional rules and
procedures regarding the exercise of Options from time to time, provided that
such rules and procedures are not inconsistent with the provisions of this
Section.
Section 8
Stock Appreciation
Rights
An Award may be in the form of an SAR.
The Exercise Price for an SAR shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of
the Common Stock on the Grant Date. The holder of a tandem SAR may elect to
exercise either the Option or the SAR, but not both. The exercise period for an
SAR shall extend no more than 10 years after the Grant Date. SARs may not
include provisions that reload the SAR upon exercise.
Subject to the foregoing
provisions, the terms, conditions, and limitations applicable to any SAR,
including, but not limited to, the term of any SAR and the date or dates upon
which the SAR becomes vested and exercisable, shall be determined by the
Committee;
provided, however
, that a SAR that may be settled all or in part in shares of
Common Stock shall be subject to the minimum Restriction Period and performance
period requirements and any other applicable requirements described in Section 6
hereof.
Section 9
Restricted Stock
Awards
An Award may be in the form of a
Restricted Stock Award. The terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any
Restricted Stock Award, including, but not limited to, vesting or other
restrictions, shall be determined by the Committee and subject to the minimum
Restriction Period and performance period requirements and any other applicable
requirements described in Section 6 hereof.
Section 10
Restricted Stock Unit
Awards
An Award may be in the form of a
Restricted Stock Unit Award. The terms, conditions and limitations applicable to
a Restricted Stock Unit Award, including, but not limited to, the Restriction
Period and the right to Dividend Equivalents, if any, shall be determined by the
Committee. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee, in its sole
discretion, may settle Restricted Stock Units in the form of cash or in shares
of Common Stock (or in a combination thereof) equal to the value of the vested
Restricted Stock Units;
provided,
however
, that a Restricted Stock Unit Award
that may be settled all or in part in shares of Common Stock shall be subject to
the minimum Restriction Period and performance period requirements and any other
applicable requirements described in Section 6 hereof.
B-8
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Section 11
Performance Unit
Awards
An Award may be in the form of a
Performance Unit Award. Each Performance Unit shall have an initial value that
is established by the Committee on the Grant Date. Subject to the terms of this
Plan, after the applicable performance period has ended, the Participant shall
be entitled to receive settlement of the value and number of Performance Units
earned by the Participant over the performance period, to be determined as a
function of the extent to which the corresponding performance goals have been
achieved. The timing and the terms of settlement of earned Performance Units
shall be as determined by the Committee and as evidenced in an Award Agreement.
Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may
settle earned Performance Units in the form of cash or in shares of Common Stock
(or in a combination thereof) equal to the value of the earned Performance Units
as soon as practicable after the end of the performance period and following the
Committees determination of actual performance against the performance measures
and related goals established by the Committee;
provided, however
, that a Performance
Unit Award that may be settled all or in part in shares of Common Stock shall be
subject to the minimum Restriction Period and performance period requirements
and any other applicable requirements described in Section 6 hereof.
Section 12
Cash Awards
An Award may be in the form of a Cash
Award. The terms, conditions and limitations applicable to a Cash Award,
including, but not limited to, vesting or other restrictions, shall be
determined by the Committee.
Section 13
Performance Awards
Without limiting the type or number of
Awards that may be made under the other provisions of this Plan, an Award may be
in the form of a Performance Award. The terms, conditions and limitations
applicable to an Award that is a Performance Award shall be determined by the
Committee.
13.1
Nonqualified Performance Awards.
Performance Awards granted to Employees that are not intended
to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m)
shall be based on achievement of such Performance Goals and be subject to such
terms, conditions and restrictions as the Committee or its delegate shall
determine.
13.2
Qualified Performance Awards.
Performance Awards granted to Employees under this Plan that are
intended to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation under Code
Section 162(m) shall be paid, vested or otherwise deliverable solely on account
of the attainment of one or more pre-established, objective Performance Goals
established by the Committee prior to the earlier to occur of (i) 90 days after
the commencement of the period of service to which the Performance Goal relates;
and (ii) the lapse of 25% of the period of service (as scheduled in good faith
at the time the goal is established), and in any event while the outcome is
substantially uncertain.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
B-9
|
Table of Contents
A Performance Goal is objective if a
third party having knowledge of the relevant facts could determine whether the
goal is met. One or more of such goals may apply to the Employee, one or more
business units, divisions or sectors of the Company, or the Company as a whole,
and if so desired by the Committee, by comparison with a peer group of companies
including by direct reference to peers, by reference to an index, or by a
similar mechanism.
(a)
Performance Goals.
A Performance Goal shall include one or more of
the following:
|
|
|
(i)
|
contract
awards;
|
(ii)
|
backlog;
|
(iii)
|
market
share;
|
(iv)
|
revenue;
|
(v)
|
sales;
|
(vi)
|
days sales
outstanding;
|
(vii)
|
overhead;
|
(viii)
|
other expense
management;
|
(ix)
|
operating
income;
|
(x)
|
operating income
margin;
|
(xi)
|
earnings (including net
earnings, EBT, EBIT and EBITDA);
|
(xii)
|
earnings
margin;
|
(xiii)
|
earnings per
share;
|
(xiv)
|
cash
flow;
|
(xv)
|
working
capital;
|
(xvi)
|
book value per
share;
|
(xvii)
|
improvement in capital
structure;
|
(xviii)
|
credit
rating;
|
(xix)
|
return on stockholders
equity;
|
(xx)
|
return on
investment;
|
(xxi)
|
cash flow return on
investment;
|
(xxii)
|
return on
assets;
|
(xxiii)
|
total stockholder
return;
|
B-10
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
(xxiv)
|
economic profit;
|
|
|
(xxv)
|
stock price;
|
|
|
(xxvi)
|
total contract value;
|
|
|
(xxvii)
|
annual contract value; or
|
|
|
(xxviii)
|
client satisfaction.
|
Unless otherwise stated, a Performance
Goal applicable to a Qualified Performance Award need not be based upon an
increase or positive result under a particular business criterion and could
include, for example, maintaining the status quo or limiting economic losses
(measured, in each case, by reference to specific business criteria).
(b)
Interpretation; Code Requirements.
In
interpreting Plan provisions applicable to Qualified Performance Awards, it is
the intent of this Plan to conform with the standards of Code Section 162(m) and
Treasury Regulation § 1.162-27(e)(2)(i), and the Committee in establishing such
goals and interpreting this Plan shall be guided by such provisions. Prior to
the payment of any compensation based on the achievement of Performance Goals
applicable to Qualified Performance Awards, the Committee must certify in
writing that applicable Performance Goals and any of the material terms thereof
were, in fact, satisfied. For this purpose, approved minutes of the Committee
meeting in which the certification is made shall be treated as such written
certification. Subject to the foregoing provisions, the terms, conditions and
limitations applicable to any Qualified Performance Awards made pursuant to this
Plan shall be determined by the Committee.
13.3
Adjustment of Performance Awards.
The Committee may provide in any such Performance Award in
writing in advance that the results may be adjusted to include or exclude
particular factors, including but not limited to any of the following events
that occur during a Performance Period:
(a) asset write-downs;
(b) litigation or claim judgments or
settlements;
(c) the effect of changes in tax laws,
accounting principles, or other laws or provisions affecting reported
results;
(d) any reorganization and
restructuring programs;
(e) extraordinary nonrecurring items as
described in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 and/or in managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
appearing in the Companys annual report to shareholders for the applicable
Fiscal Year;
(f) acquisitions or
divestitures;
(g) foreign exchange gains and losses;
and
(h) settlement of hedging
activities.
Only Awards that are not intended to
qualify as Qualified Performance Awards may be adjusted upward in the discretion
of the Committee. The Committee may retain the discretion to adjust any
Performance Awards downward, either on a formula or discretionary basis or any
combination, as the Committee determines.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
B-11
|
Table of Contents
Section 14
Change of Control
Notwithstanding any other provision of
this Plan to the contrary, unless (1) an Award Agreement shall specify otherwise
or (2) the agreement effectuating the Change in Control provides for the
assumption or substitution of Awards, upon the date of a Change in
Control:
(a) all outstanding Options that have
not vested in full on or prior thereto shall be fully vested and
exercisable;
(b) all restrictions applicable to
outstanding Restricted Stock shall lapse in full;
(c) all outstanding Restricted Stock
Units that have not vested in full on or prior thereto shall be fully
vested;
(d) if the Change in Control occurs
during the Performance Period, all Performance Awards shall be considered earned
and payable at their target value, prorated for the portion of the Performance
Period that has elapsed and shall be immediately paid or settled; and
(e) if the Change in Control occurs
after the Performance Period, all Performance Awards shall, as soon as
administratively practicable, be paid or settled based on the actual achievement
of the applicable performance goals
Section 15
Taxes
The Company shall have the right to
deduct applicable taxes from any Award payment and withhold, at the time of
delivery or vesting of cash or shares of Common Stock under this Plan, an
appropriate amount of cash or number of shares of Common Stock or a combination
thereof for payment of required withholding taxes or to take such other action
as may be necessary in the opinion of the Company to satisfy all obligations for
withholding of such taxes;
provided,
however
, that the number of shares of Common
Stock withheld for payment of required withholding taxes must equal no more than
the required minimum withholding taxes. The Committee may also permit
withholding to be satisfied by the transfer to the Company of shares of Common
Stock theretofore owned by the holder of the Award with respect to which
withholding is required. If shares of Common Stock are used to satisfy tax
withholding, such shares shall be valued based on the Fair Market Value when the
tax withholding is required to be made.
Section 16
Amendment, Modification, Suspension
or Termination
The Board may amend, modify, suspend or
terminate this Plan (and the Committee may amend an Award Agreement) for the
purpose of meeting or addressing any changes in legal requirements or for any
other purpose permitted by law, except that no amendment or alteration that
would adversely affect the rights of any Participant under any Award previously
granted to such Participant shall be made without the consent of such
Participant.
B-12
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
No amendment or alteration shall be
effective prior to its approval by the stockholders of the Company to the extent
stockholder approval is otherwise required by applicable legal requirements or
the requirements of the securities exchange on which the Companys stock is
listed, including any amendment that:
(a) expands the types of Awards
available under this Plan;
(b) materially increases the number of
shares of Common Stock available for Awards under this Plan;
(c) materially expands the classes of
persons eligible for Awards under this Plan;
(d) materially extends the term of this
Plan;
(e) materially changes the method of
determining the Exercise Price of Options;
(f) deletes or limits any provisions of
this Plan that prohibit the repricing of Options or SARs; or
(g) decreases any minimum vesting
requirements for any Stock Award.
Section 17
Assignability
Unless otherwise determined by the
Committee and expressly provided for in an Award Agreement, no Award or any
other benefit under this Plan shall be assignable or otherwise transferable
except (1) by will or the laws of descent and distribution or (2) pursuant to a
domestic relations order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction that is not
contrary to the terms and conditions of this Plan or applicable Award and in a
form acceptable to the Committee. The Committee may prescribe and include in
applicable Award Agreements other restrictions on transfer. Any attempted
assignment of an Award or any other benefit under this Plan in violation of this
Section 17 shall be null and void. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Award may
be transferred for value or consideration.
Section 18
Adjustments
18.1
Outstanding Awards.
The
existence of outstanding Awards shall not affect in any manner the right or
power of the Company or its stockholders to make or authorize any or all
adjustments, recapitalizations, reorganizations or other changes in the capital
stock of the Company or its business or any merger or consolidation of the
Company, or any issue of bonds, debentures, preferred or prior preference stock
(whether or not such issue is prior to, on a parity with or junior to the Common
Stock) or the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, or any sale or transfer
of all or any part of its assets or business, or any other corporate act or
proceeding of any kind, whether or not of a character similar to that of the
acts or proceedings enumerated above.
18.2
Plan Adjustments
(a)
Subdivision or Consolidation
. In
the event of any subdivision or consolidation of outstanding shares of Common
Stock, declaration of a dividend payable in shares of Common Stock or other
stock split, then:
|
(i)
|
|
the number of shares of Common Stock reserved under this
Plan and the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance
pursuant to specific types of Awards as described in Section
4;
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
|
the number of shares of Common Stock covered by
outstanding Awards;
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
B-13
|
Table of Contents
|
(iii)
|
|
the exercise price or other price
in respect of such Awards;
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iv)
|
|
the appropriate Fair Market Value
and other price determinations for such Awards; and
|
|
|
|
(v)
|
|
any other limitations contained
within this Plan shall each be proportionately adjusted by the Committee
as appropriate to reflect such transaction.
|
(b)
Recapitalizations, Reorganizations,
etc
. In the event of any other recapitalization or capital reorganization of the
Company, any consolidation or merger of the Company with another corporation or
entity, the adoption by the Company of any plan of exchange affecting the Common
Stock or any distribution to holders of Common Stock of securities or property
(other than normal cash dividends or dividends payable in Common Stock), the
Committee shall make appropriate adjustments to:
|
(i)
|
|
the number of shares of Common
Stock reserved under this Plan and the number of shares of Common Stock
available for issuance pursuant to specific types of Awards as described
in Section 4;
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
|
the number of shares of Common
Stock covered by outstanding Awards;
|
|
|
|
(iii)
|
|
the exercise price or other price
in respect of such Awards;
|
|
|
|
(iv)
|
|
the appropriate Fair Market Value
and other price determinations for such Awards;
|
|
|
|
(v)
|
|
the Stock-Based Award
Limitations; and
|
|
|
|
(vi)
|
|
any other limitations contained
within this Plan;
|
provided that such adjustments shall
only be such as are necessary to maintain the proportionate interest of the
holders of the Awards and preserve, without exceeding, the value of such
Awards.
18.3
Award Adjustments.
In
the event of a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or
stock, separation, split-up, spin-off, split-off, initial public offering of the
common equity of a Subsidiary, reorganization or liquidation, the Committee may
make such adjustments to Awards or other provisions for the disposition of
Awards as it deems equitable, and shall be authorized, in its discretion,
to:
(a) provide for the substitution of a
new Award or other arrangement (which, if applicable, may be exercisable for
such property or stock as the Committee determines, including stock of another
company) for an Award or the assumption of the Award (and for awards not granted
under this Plan), regardless of whether in a transaction to which Code Section
424(a) applies;
(b) provide, prior to the transaction,
for the acceleration of the vesting and exercisability of, or lapse of
restrictions with respect to, the Award and, if the transaction is a cash
merger, provide for the termination of any portion of the Award that remains
unexercised at the time of such transaction;
(c) provide for the acceleration of the
vesting and exercisability of an Award and the cancellation thereof in exchange
for such payment as the Committee, in its sole discretion, determines is a
reasonable approximation of the value thereof;
(d) cancel any Awards and direct the
Company to deliver to the Participants who are the holders of such Awards cash
in an amount that the Committee shall determine in its sole discretion is equal
to the Fair Market Value of such Awards as of the date of such event, which, in
the case of any Option, shall be the amount equal to the excess of the Fair
Market Value of a share of Common Stock as of such date over the per-share
B-14
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
exercise price for such Option (for the
avoidance of doubt, if such exercise price is less than such Fair Market Value,
the Option may be canceled for no consideration or for such consideration that
the Committee shall determine or as provided by the agreement effectuating an
event described in this Section 18.3); or
(e) cancel Awards that are Options and
give the Participants who are the holders of such Awards notice and opportunity
to exercise prior to such cancellation.
18.4
Compliance with Code Section 409A.
No adjustment or substitution pursuant to this Section 18
shall be made in a manner that results in noncompliance with the requirements of
Code Section 409A, to the extent applicable.
Section 19
Restrictions
No Common Stock or other form of
payment shall be issued with respect to any Award unless the Company shall be
satisfied based on the advice of its counsel that such issuance will be in
compliance with applicable federal and state securities laws. Certificates
evidencing shares of Common Stock delivered under this Plan (to the extent that
such shares are so evidenced) may be subject to such stop transfer orders and
other restrictions as the Committee may deem advisable under the rules,
regulations and other requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
any securities exchange or transaction reporting system upon which the Common
Stock is then listed or to which it is admitted for quotation and any applicable
federal or state securities law. The Committee may cause a legend or legends to
be placed upon such certificates (if any) to make appropriate reference to such
restrictions.
Section 20
Unfunded Plan
This Plan is unfunded. Although
bookkeeping accounts may be established with respect to Participants who are
entitled to cash, Common Stock or rights thereto under this Plan, any such
accounts shall be used merely as a bookkeeping convenience. The Company shall
not be required to segregate any assets that may at any time be represented by
cash, Common Stock or rights thereto, nor shall this Plan be construed as
providing for such segregation, nor shall the Company, the Board or the
Committee be deemed to be a trustee of any cash, Common Stock or rights thereto
to be granted under this Plan. Any liability or obligation of the Company to any
Participant with respect to an Award of cash, Common Stock or rights thereto
under this Plan shall be based solely upon any contractual obligations that may
be created by this Plan and any Award Agreement, and no such liability or
obligation of the Company shall be deemed to be secured by any pledge or other
encumbrance on any property of the Company. None of the Company, the Board or
the Committee shall be required to give any security or bond for the performance
of any obligation that may be created by this Plan. With respect to this Plan
and any Awards granted hereunder, Participants are general and unsecured
creditors of the Company and have no rights or claims except as otherwise
provided in this Plan or any applicable Award Agreement.
Section 21
Code Section 409A
21.1
Awards.
Awards made
under this Plan are intended to comply with or be exempt from Code Section 409A,
and ambiguous provisions hereof, if any, shall be construed and interpreted in a
manner consistent with such intent. No payment, benefit or consideration shall
be substituted for an Award if such action would result in the imposition of
taxes under Code Section 409A. Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the
contrary, if any Plan provision or Award under this Plan would result in the
imposition of an additional
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
B-15
|
Table of Contents
tax under Code Section 409A, that Plan
provision or Award shall be reformed, to the extent permissible under Code
Section 409A, to avoid imposition of the additional tax, and no such action
shall be deemed to adversely affect the Participants rights to an
Award.
21.2
Settlement Period.
Unless the Committee provides otherwise in an Award Agreement, each Restricted
Stock Unit Award, Performance Unit Award or Cash Award (or portion thereof if
the Award is subject to a vesting schedule) shall be settled no later than the
15th day of the third month after the end of the first calendar year in which
the Award (or such portion thereof) is no longer subject to a substantial risk
of forfeiture within the meaning of Code Section 409A. If the Committee
determines that a Restricted Stock Unit Award, Performance Unit Award or Cash
Award is intended to be subject to Code Section 409A, the applicable Award
Agreement shall include terms that are designed to satisfy the requirements of
Code Section 409A.
21.3
Specified Employees.
If
the Participant is identified by the Company as a specified employee within
the meaning of Code Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) on the date on which the
Participant has a separation from service (other than due to death) within the
meaning of Treasury Regulation § 1.409A-1(h), any Award payable or settled on
account of a separation from service that is deferred compensation subject to
Code Section 409A shall be paid or settled on the earliest of (i) the first
business day following the expiration of six months from the Participants
separation from service, (ii) the date of the Participants death, or (iii) such
earlier date as complies with the requirements of Code Section 409A.
Section 22
Award Termination, Forfeiture and
Disgorgement
The Committee shall have full power and
authority to determine whether, to what extent and under what circumstances any
Award shall be terminated or forfeited, or the Participant should be required to
disgorge to the Company any gains attributable to the Award. Such circumstances
may include, without limitation, the following actions by a
Participant:
(a) competing with the Company or
participating in any enterprise that competes with the Company;
(b) using or disclosing, other than as
expressly authorized by the Company or a Subsidiary, any confidential business
information or trade secrets that the Participant obtains during the course of
his or her employment with the Company or any Subsidiary; and
(c) after the Participant is no longer
employed by the Company or any Subsidiary:
|
(i)
|
|
soliciting, with respect to any
of the services or products that the Company or any Subsidiary then
provides to customers, any person or entity whom the Participant knows to
be a customer of the Company or any Subsidiary, or whose business the
Participant solicited on behalf of the Company or any Subsidiary while
employed by it,
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
|
soliciting or hiring any person
who is then an Employee, or
|
|
|
|
(iii)
|
|
taking any action that, in the
judgment of the Committee, is not in the best interests of the
Company.
|
Additionally, any Awards granted
pursuant to this Plan shall be subject to any recoupment or clawback policy that
is adopted by, or applicable to, the Company.
B-16
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Section 23
Awards to Non-U.S.
Employees
Awards may be granted to Employees who
are foreign nationals or employed outside the United States, or both, on such
terms and conditions different from those applicable to Awards to Employees
employed in the United States as may, in the judgment of the Committee, be
necessary or desirable in order to recognize differences in local law or tax
policy. The Committee also may impose conditions on the exercise or vesting of
Awards in order to minimize the Companys obligation with respect to tax
equalization for Employees on assignments outside their home country.
Section 24
Governing Law
This Plan and all determinations made
and actions taken pursuant hereto, to the extent not otherwise governed by
mandatory provisions of the Code or the securities laws of the United States,
shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Nevada.
Section 25
Right to Continued Service or
Employment
Nothing in this Plan or an Award
Agreement shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries to terminate any Participants employment or other
service relationship with the Company or its Subsidiaries at any time, nor
confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the capacity in which he is
employed or otherwise serves the Company or its Subsidiaries.
Section 26
Term
This Plan, as approved by the Board on
May 14, 2013, shall be effective as of the Effective Date. This Plan shall
continue in effect for a term of 10 years commencing on the Effective Date,
unless earlier terminated by action of the Board.
Section 27
Usage
Words used in this Plan in the singular
shall include the plural and in the plural the singular, and the gender of words
used shall be construed to include whichever may be appropriate under any
particular circumstances of the masculine, feminine or neuter
genders.
Section 28
Headings
The headings in this Plan are inserted
for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the meaning or
interpretation of this Plan.
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
B-17
|
Table of Contents
APPENDIX C - 2010 NON-EMPLOYEE
DIRECTOR INCENTIVE PLAN
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this amended and
restated 2010 Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan (Plan) of Computer Sciences
Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the Company), is to enable the Company to
attract, retain and motivate its Non-Employee Directors by providing for or
increasing their proprietary interests in the Company.
SECTION 2. CERTAIN
DEFINITIONS
As used in this Plan, the following
terms have the meanings set forth below:
|
(a)
|
|
Administrator means that
administrator of the Plan as described in Section 3.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Award means any Restricted
Stock or RSU.
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Award Agreement means any
written or electronic agreement, contract, or other instrument or document
evidencing any Award granted hereunder, in a form approved by the
Administrator that is executed or acknowledged by both the Company and the
Participant.
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
Board means the Board of
Directors of the Company.
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
Change in Control means a
change in control, as defined in Section 409A.
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
Code means the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and any successor
thereto.
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
Dividend Equivalents means an
amount equal to dividends and other distributions (or the economic
equivalent thereof) that are payable to stockholders of record on a like
number of Shares.
|
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
Exchange Act means the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
Fair Market Value means, with
respect to any property, the market value of such property determined by
such methods or procedures as shall be established from time to time by
the Administrator. Unless the Administrator shall determine otherwise, the
Fair Market Value of a Share on any day means the last sale price, regular
way, of a Share on such day (or in case the principal United States
national securities exchange on which the Shares are listed or admitted to
trading is not open on such date, the next preceding date upon which it is
open), or in case no such sale takes place on such day, the average of the
closing bid and asked prices, regular way, in either case as reported in
the principal consolidated transaction reporting system with respect to
securities listed or admitted to trading on the principal United States
national securities exchange on which the Shares are listed or admitted to
trading.
|
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
Fiscal Year means a fiscal year
of the Company.
|
|
|
|
(k)
|
|
Non-Employee Director means a
director of the Company who is not an employee of the Company or any of
its subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
(l)
|
|
Participant means a
Non-Employee Director who is selected by the Administrator to receive an
Award under this Plan.
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
C-1
|
Table of Contents
|
(m)
|
|
Restricted Stock means any
Share issued hereunder with the restriction that the holder may not sell,
assign, transfer, pledge or otherwise encumber such Share, and with such
other restrictions as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, may
impose, which restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such
time or times, in installments or otherwise, as the Administrator may deem
appropriate.
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit or RSU
means a right granted hereunder to receive a specified number of Shares,
or cash based on the Fair Market Value of such Shares, upon vesting or at
a later date permitted in the Award Agreement.
|
|
|
|
(o)
|
|
Section 409A means Section 409A
of the Code, together with the regulations and other Treasury department
guidance promulgated thereunder.
|
|
|
|
(p)
|
|
Section 409A Transaction means
a change in ownership or effective control of a corporation or a change
in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of a corporation
as defined in Section 409A.
|
|
|
|
(q)
|
|
Shares means shares of the
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the Company, as adjusted in
accordance with Section 5(d) hereof.
|
SECTION 3.
ADMINISTRATION
This Plan shall be administered by the
Board or, in the Boards discretion, a committee of the Board (the Board or such
Committee, the Administrator) consisting of at least three directors, each of
whom is (i) independent for purposes of the Companys Corporate Governance
Guidelines; and (ii) a non-employee director for purposes of Rule 16b-3(b)(3)
promulgated under the Exchange Act.
Subject to the provisions of this Plan,
the Administrator shall be authorized and empowered to do all things necessary
or desirable in connection with the administration of this Plan, including,
without limitation, the following:
|
(a)
|
|
adopt, amend and rescind rules
and regulations relating to this Plan;
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
determine which persons are
Non-Employee Directors, and to which of such Non-Employee Directors, if
any, Awards shall be granted hereunder;
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
grant Awards to Non-Employee
Directors and determine the terms and conditions thereof, including the
number of Shares and/or the amount of cash issuable pursuant
thereto;
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
determine whether, to what extent
and under what circumstances Awards may be settled in cash, Shares or
other property, or canceled or suspended;
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
determine whether, and the extent
to which adjustments are required pursuant to Section 5(d) hereof;
and
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
interpret and construe this Plan
and the terms and conditions of all Awards granted
hereunder.
|
Decisions of the Administrator shall be
final, conclusive and binding upon all persons and entities, including the
Company, all stockholders of the Company, all Non-Employee Directors, all
Participants and all persons claiming under Award Agreements.
C-2
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
SECTION 4.
ELIGIBILITY
Any Non-Employee Director shall be
eligible to be selected as a Participant.
SECTION 5. SHARES SUBJECT TO THIS
PLAN
|
(a)
|
|
The maximum aggregate number of
Shares that may be issued pursuant to all Awards granted under this Plan
shall be 800,000, of which 500,000 shares were added in 2016, subject to
adjustment as provided in Section 5(d) hereof.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
In connection with the granting
of an Award, the number of Shares available for issuance under this Plan
shall be reduced by the number of Shares in respect of which the Award is
granted or denominated.
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Whenever any outstanding Award
(or portion thereof) expires, is cancelled or is otherwise terminated for
any reason without having been exercised or payment having been made in
the form of Shares, the number of Shares available for issuance under this
Plan shall be increased by the number of Shares allocable to the expired,
cancelled or otherwise terminated Award (or portion thereof). To the
extent that any Award is forfeited, the Shares subject to such Awards will
not be counted as shares delivered under this Plan. Awards valued by
reference to Common Stock that may be settled in equivalent cash value
will count as Shares delivered to the same extent as if the Award were
settled in Shares.
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
If the outstanding securities of
the class then subject to this Plan are increased, decreased or exchanged
for or converted into cash, property and/or a different number or kind of
securities, or if cash, property and/or securities are distributed in
respect of such outstanding securities, in either case as a result of a
reorganization, merger, consolidation, recapitalization, restructuring,
reclassification, dividend (other than a regular, quarterly cash dividend)
or other distribution, stock split, reverse stock split or the like, or if
substantially all of the property and assets of the Company are sold,
then, unless the terms of such transaction shall provide otherwise, the
Administrator shall make appropriate and proportionate adjustments, as of
the date of such transaction, in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
the number and type of shares or
other securities or cash or other property that may be acquired pursuant
to outstanding Awards; and
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
the maximum number and type of
shares or other securities that may be issued pursuant to all Awards
granted under this Plan, as set forth in Section 5(a)
hereof.
|
SECTION 6. RESTRICTED STOCK AND
RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
Restricted Stock and RSUs may be
granted hereunder to Participants. All Restricted Stock and RSUs shall be
subject to the following terms and conditions, and to such additional terms and
conditions, not inconsistent with the provisions of this Plan, as the
Administrator shall deem desirable:
|
(a)
|
|
Restrictions
. The
restrictions applicable to each grant of Restricted Stock and the vesting
provisions applicable to each grant of RSUs shall be determined by the
Administrator, in its sole discretion, and shall be based on the
Participants continued service as a Non-Employee Director (time-based
vesting).
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
C-3
|
Table of Contents
|
(b)
|
|
Accelerated
Vesting
. The vesting of Restricted
Stock or RSUs may, in the sole discretion of the Administrator, be
accelerated in the event of the Participants death or termination of
service as a Non-Employee Director, or may be accelerated pursuant to
Section 7 hereof upon a Change in Control.
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Voting and
Dividends
. Rights to dividends or
Dividend Equivalents may be extended to and made part of any Award
consisting of Restricted Stock or RSUs, subject to such terms, conditions
and restrictions as the Administrator may establish. The Administrator may
also establish rules and procedures for the crediting of interest on
deferred cash payments and Dividend Equivalents for Awards consisting of
Restricted Stock or RSUs. Unless the Administrator, in its sole
discretion, shall determine otherwise, all Restricted Stock shall have
full voting rights.
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
Stock
Certificates
. Restricted Stock issued
hereunder may be evidenced in such manner as the Administrator, in its
sole discretion, shall deem appropriate, including, without limitation,
book-entry registration or the issuance of a stock certificate or
certificates registered in the name of the Participant and bearing an
appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions and restrictions
applicable to such Restricted Stock.
|
SECTION 7. CHANGE IN
CONTROL
Notwithstanding any other provision of
this Plan to the contrary, unless an Award Agreement shall specify otherwise,
upon the date of a Change in Control:
|
(a)
|
|
all restrictions applicable to
outstanding Restricted Stock shall lapse in full; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
all outstanding RSUs that have
not vested in full on or prior thereto shall be fully
vested.
|
SECTION 8. AMENDMENTS AND
TERMINATION
The Board may amend, alter, suspend,
discontinue or terminate this Plan or the terms of any outstanding Award, or any
portion thereof, at any time and in any manner; provided, however, that no such
amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuation or termination shall be made
without:
|
(a)
|
|
the approval of the Companys
stockholders, if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) such approval is necessary to
qualify for or comply with any tax or regulatory requirement for which or
with which the Board deems it necessary or desirable to qualify or
comply,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) such approval is required by
the New York Stock Exchange or the Securities and Exchange Commission,
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) such amendment, alteration,
suspension, discontinuation or termination would materially increase the
benefits accruing to Participants, materially increase the maximum number
of shares or other securities which may be issued under this Plan,
materially modify this Plans eligibility requirements;
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
the consent of each Participant
whose rights under any outstanding Award would be impaired by such
action.
|
C-4
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
SECTION 9. GENERAL
PROVISIONS
|
(a)
|
|
Nontransferability of
Awards
. Unless the Administrator
determines otherwise at the time the Award is granted or thereafter no
Award, and no Shares subject to an outstanding Award as to which any
applicable restriction or deferral period has not lapsed, may be sold,
assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered, except by will or
the laws of descent and distribution; provided, however, that if so
permitted by the Administrator, a Participant may designate a beneficiary
to receive his or her rights under any Award after his or her
death.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Award
Entitlement
. No Non-Employee Director
or Participant shall have any claim to be granted any Award under this
Plan, and there is no obligation for uniformity of treatment of
Non-Employee Directors or Participants under this Plan.
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Requirement of Award
Agreement
. The prospective recipient of
any Award under this Plan shall not, with respect to such Award, be deemed
to have become a Participant, or to have any rights with respect to such
Award, unless and until both the Company and such recipient shall have
executed an Award Agreement evidencing the Award and the recipient shall
have delivered a copy thereof to the Company.
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
Termination, Forfeiture and
Disgorgement
. The Administrator shall
have full power and authority to determine whether, to what extent and
under what circumstances any Award shall be terminated or forfeited, or
the Participant should be required to disgorge to the Company any amounts
attributable to the Award. Such circumstances may include, without
limitation, the following actions by a Participant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) competing with the Company or
participating in any enterprise that competes with the Company;
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) using or disclosing, other
than as expressly authorized by the Company or a Subsidiary, any
confidential business information or trade secrets that the Participant
obtains during the course of his or her service as a Non-Employee
Director.
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
Compliance with Securities
Laws
. No Award granted hereunder shall
be construed as an offer to sell securities of the Company, and no such
offer shall be outstanding, unless and until the Administrator, in its
sole discretion, has determined that any such offer, if made, would be in
compliance with all applicable requirements of the U.S. federal securities
laws and any other laws to which such offer, if made, would be
subject.
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
Award
Deferrals
. The Administrator shall have
full power and authority to establish procedures in compliance with
Section 409A, if applicable, pursuant to which the payment or settlement
of any Award may be deferred.
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
Governing Law
. The validity, construction and effect of this Plan and
any rules and regulations relating to this Plan shall be determined in
accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada and applicable U.S.
federal law.
|
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
Severability
. If any provision of this Plan is or becomes or is
deemed invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, or would
disqualify this Plan or any Award under any law deemed applicable by the
Administrator, such provision shall be construed or deemed amended to
conform to applicable laws, or, if it cannot be construed or deemed
amended without, in the determination of the Administrator, materially
altering the intent of this Plan, it shall be stricken and the remainder
of this Plan shall remain in full force and
effect.
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
|
C-5
|
Table of Contents
SECTION 10. SECTION 409A
Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, if any Plan provision or Award under this Plan would result in the imposition of an additional tax under Section 409A, that Plan provision or Award will be reformed to avoid imposition of the additional tax, including that any Award subject to 409A held by a specified employee that is settled upon termination of employment (for reasons other than death) shall be delayed in payment until the expiration of six months, and no action taken to comply with Section 409A shall be deemed to adversely affect the Participants rights to an Award. Awards made under this Plan are intended to comply with or be exempt from Section 409A, and ambiguous provisions hereof, if any, shall be construed and interpreted in a manner consistent with such intent. No payment, benefit or consideration shall be substituted for an Award if such action would result in the imposition of taxes under Section 409A.
SECTION 11. TERM OF PLAN
This amended and restated Plan is effective as of May 14, 2013, the date upon which it was approved by the Board; provided, however, that no Award may be granted under this amended and restated Plan until it has been approved by the stockholders of the Company. No Award may be granted under this Plan after May 13, 2023, but any award granted prior to that date may extend beyond that date.
C-6
|
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy
Statement
|
Table of Contents
Regional CSC
Headquarters
The
Americas
1775 Tysons
Boulevard
Tysons, VA 22102
United States
Asia, Middle East,
Africa
Level 9, UE BizHub
East
6 Changi Business Park Avenue
1
Singapore 468017
Republic of Singapore
+65.6809.9000
Australia
26 Talavera Road
Macquarie Park, NSW 2113
Australia
+61(2)9034.3000
Central and Eastern
Europe
Abraham-Lincoln-Park
1
65189 Wiesbaden
Germany
+49.611.1420
Nordic and Baltic
Region
Retortvej 8
DK-2500
Valby
Denmark
+45.36.14.4000
South and West
Europe
Tour Carpe Diem
31 place
des Corolles
CS 40075
92098 Paris La
Défense Cedex
France
+33.1.55.707070
|
|
|
|
UK, Ireland and
Netherlands
Floor 4
One Pancras Square
London
N1C 4AG
United Kingdom
+44.20.3696.3000
|
About CSC
CSC (NYSE: CSC) leads clients on their digital
transformation journeys. The company provides innovative next-generation
technology services and solutions that leverage deep industry expertise,
global scale, technology independence and an extensive partner community.
CSC serves leading commercial and international public sector
organizations throughout the world. CSC is a Fortune 500 company and
ranked among the best corporate citizens. For more information, visit the
companys website at
www.csc.com.
|
© 2016 Computer Sciences Corporation.
All rights reserved. MD_8881b-17 06/2016
Table of Contents
CSC INVESTOR RELATIONS
1775
TYSONS BOULEVARD
TYSONS, VA 22102
VOTE BY INTERNET
Before The Meeting
- Go to
www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet up until 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on August 9, 2016 to transmit your voting instructions and to
enroll for electronic delivery of subsequent stockholder communications. Have
your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions
to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction
form.
During The Meeting
- Go to
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CSC
You may attend the Meeting via the Internet and vote during the Meeting.
Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available
and follow the instructions.
VOTE BY PHONE -
1.800.690.6903
To transmit your voting
instructions, use any touch-tone telephone up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on
August 9, 2016. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the
instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the
postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o
Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
Note: Regardless of which voting
method you use, proxy voting instructions for shares held in the Company's
Matched Asset Plan must be given by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on August 5,
2016.
TO
VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
|
E12328-P80119-Z67907
|
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR
RECORDS
|
|
DETACH AND RETURN
THIS PORTION ONLY
|
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND
DATED.
|
COMPUTER SCIENCES
CORPORATION
|
The Board of Directors
recommends a vote "FOR" each of the nominees in Proposal 1, and "FOR"
Proposal 2, Proposal 3, Proposal 4 and Proposal 5
|
|
|
|
Vote On Directors
|
|
|
1.
|
|
To elect ten nominees to the CSC Board of
Directors
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
|
|
Nominees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1a.
|
|
Mukesh Aghi
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1b.
|
|
Herman E. Bulls
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1c.
|
|
Bruce B. Churchill
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1d.
|
|
Mark Foster
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1e.
|
|
Sachin Lawande
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1f.
|
|
J. Michael Lawrie
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1g.
|
|
Brian P. MacDonald
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1h.
|
|
Peter Rutland
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1i.
|
|
Robert F. Woods
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1j.
|
|
Lizabeth H. Zlatkus
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To provide comments, please check
this box and write them on the back where indicated.
|
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote On
Proposals
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
Approval, by advisory vote, of
executive compensation
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
Ratification of the appointment of
independent auditors for fiscal year 2017
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
The approval of an amendment to the
2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized
for issuance under the plan by an additional 7,250,000 shares
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
The approval of an amendment to the
2010 Non-Employee Director Incentive Plan to increase the number of
shares authorized for issuance under the plan by an additional 500,000
shares
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
☐
|
|
Please sign, date and return this
Proxy promptly whether or not you plan to attend the meeting. If signing
for a corporation or partnership, or as an agent, attorney or fiduciary,
indicate the capacity in which you are signing. If you do attend the
meeting and elect to vote by ballot, such vote will supersede this
Proxy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN
BOX]
|
Date
|
|
Signature (Joint Owners)
|
Date
|
|
Table of Contents
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO
STOCKHOLDERS
VOTING PREVENTS
ESCHEATMENT
Most states have escheatment laws which
require CSC to transfer stockholder accounts when they meet that state's
criteria for abandoned property. These laws require CSC to issue a replacement
stock certificate to the applicable state and the certificate in the
stockholder's possession is cancelled on the records of CSC's transfer agent.
While the specified number of years varies by state, escheatment generally
occurs if you have not voted during a three-year period and you have not
contacted CSC's transfer agent during that time. After delivery to the state,
the stock often is sold and claimants are given only the proceeds of the sale,
which may or may not be to your benefit, depending on the subsequent trend of
the stock price. In addition, it can take many months to retrieve custody of the
stock or the proceeds of its sale.
Therefore, it is very important that
you vote and that CSC has your current address. If you have moved, please
provide your new address to CSC's transfer agent: Computershare Inc., P.O. Box
30170, College Station, TX 77842; telephone 800.676.0654; and Internet address:
www-us.computershare.com/investor/contact. Please inform Computershare if there
are multiple accounts or stock is held under more than one name.
For additional information, the CSC
Shareholder Services and automated literature request line is available at
telephone 800.542.3070.
Note: CSC employees are requested to
notify the CSC Service Center (telephone 877.612.2211) of any address change or
their local Human Resources representative if not supported by the CSC Service
Center.
Important Notice Regarding the
Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available
at www.proxyvote.com.
COMPUTER SCIENCES
CORPORATION
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS,
AUGUST 10, 2016
The undersigned hereby appoints J.
MICHAEL LAWRIE, PAUL N. SALEH and WILLIAM L. DECKELMAN, JR., and each of them,
with full power of substitution and discretion in each of them, as the proxy or
proxies of the undersigned to represent the undersigned and to vote all shares
of Common Stock of Computer Sciences Corporation which the undersigned would be
entitled to vote if personally present at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to
be held at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CSC, at 10:30 a.m., Eastern Time,
on August 10, 2016, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, and to
consider and to vote on any other matter properly coming before the
meeting.
If more than one of such proxies or
substitutes shall be present and vote, a majority thereof shall have the powers
hereby granted, and if only one of them shall be present and vote, he shall have
the powers hereby granted.
This card also provides voting
instructions for shares, if any, held in the Company's Matched Asset
Plan.
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED
HEREIN, OR IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED FOR 1) THE ELECTION OF
DIRECTORS, 2) ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY'S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION, 3)
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS, 4) THE APPROVAL OF AN
AMENDMENT TO THE 2011 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN AND 5) THE APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT
TO THE 2010 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR INCENTIVE PLAN.
SHARES ALLOCATED TO THIS ACCOUNT AND HELD IN THE COMPANY'S MATCHED ASSET
PLAN WILL BE VOTED BY THE BANK OF NEW YORK (THE TRUSTEE FOR THOSE SHARES). IF
THE TRUSTEE DOES NOT RECEIVE VOTING INSTRUCTIONS FOR SHARES HELD IN THE MATCHED
ASSET PLAN BY AUGUST 5, 2016, THOSE SHARES WILL BE VOTED IN THE SAME PROPORTION
AS THE SHARES FOR WHICH VOTING INSTRUCTIONS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY.
THIS PROXY MAY BE REVOKED AT ANY TIME
PRIOR TO THE VOTING THEREOF.
NOTE: THIS PROXY MUST BE SIGNED AND DATED ON THE
REVERSE SIDE.
(If you noted any Comments above, please
mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)
PROXY
If you do not timely vote by
Internet, telephone or mailing your completed proxy card, or by attending the
meeting and voting by ballot, these shares cannot be voted except for non-voted
shares allocated to this MAP account, which will be voted as set forth on the
reverse side.
Computer Sciences (NYSE:CSC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Computer Sciences (NYSE:CSC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024