Momentum to hold investigations into alleged Russian hacking
during the U.S. presidential election picked up steam on Monday,
with the Senate's top Republican joining Democrats, the White House
and other GOP leaders in calls for a probe, despite repeated
dismissals by President-elect Donald Trump of intelligence
assessments of the hacking.
As the furor mounted on Monday, Mr. Trump was left nearly alone
among political leaders in questioning the conclusion that Russia
stole emails from the Democratic National Committee and Hillary
Clinton's campaign, and leaked them in an effort to interfere with
the election. He said in a Twitter message that the allegations
amounted to a "conspiracy theory."
The burgeoning controversy helped galvanize suspicion among
Democrats and Republicans alike toward Moscow, with political
anxieties spilling into Mr. Trump's choice of Exxon Mobil Corp.
Chief Executive Rex Tillerson as secretary of state. Mr. Tillerson
has business connections to Russian President Vladimir Putin, and
Exxon has pursued ventures with the Russian government. Several
lawmakers said they would closely question such ties.
In one sign of the growing urgency, 10 members of the Electoral
College sent an open letter to James Clapper, director of national
intelligence, saying that in order to fulfill their constitutional
obligations, they needed to know "whether there are ongoing
investigations into ties between Donald Trump, his campaign or
associates, and Russian government interference in the
election."
Mrs. Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta, whose emails
were stolen by hackers and released by WikiLeaks, said her campaign
supports the electors' efforts to disclose more findings.
"Faithless" electors, who cast a ballot for someone other than
the candidate they are pledged to support, often have been a part
of presidential politics. But so far, no faithless electors have
ever managed to swing the outcome of a presidential election.
Still, the level of activity surrounding the Electoral College vote
is unprecedented in recent memory. An organized effort among
electors to overturn the result was part of the 1960 election, when
several electors of both parties cast votes for a conservative
Democrat senator, but didn't prevent the election of John F.
Kennedy.
U.S. intelligence officials for months have been investigating
the alleged hacking, which Russia has repeatedly denied.
Intelligence officials said in a statement in October, before the
election, that they were confident Russia committed the
cyberattacks to influence U.S. elections.
The Central Intelligence Agency earlier this month briefed
senators that the Russian interference appeared intended to aid Mr.
Trump. Democratic and GOP lawmakers have called for investigations
by congressional committees or by an independent panel.
Mr. Trump in recent days has sharply attacked the intelligence
assessments as "ridiculous," saying he doesn't believe them and
mentioning the CIA's incorrect 2003 intelligence assessments about
Iraq's weapons programs.
"Can you imagine if the election results were the opposite and
WE tried to play the Russia/CIA card. It would be called conspiracy
theory!" Mr. Trump tweeted Monday morning.
He also has continued to insist there was no evidence pointing
to Russia and suggested the conclusions of all U.S. intelligence
agencies to the contrary were based on flawed methods. "Unless you
catch 'hackers' in the act, it is very hard to determine who was
doing the hacking," Mr. Trump also said on Twitter Monday
morning.
But private security experts did in fact monitor hackers
stealing emails from the networks of the DNC. Those emails were
later published by WikiLeaks.
Mr. Trump appeared to lose a key ally in the dispute Monday when
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) said he supported
an inquiry, effectively guaranteeing that some probe will
occur.
"Any foreign breach of our cybersecurity measures is disturbing,
and I strongly condemn any such efforts," Mr. McConnell said. He
added, "This simply cannot be a partisan issue," and said the
Senate Intelligence Committee "is more than capable of conducting a
complete review of this matter."
Mr. McConnell also expressed his support for the CIA, just days
after Mr. Trump took his public shot at the agency. "I have the
highest confidence in the intelligence community and especially the
Central Intelligence Agency," Mr. McConnell said. "The CIA is
filled with selfless patriots, many of whom anonymously risked
their lives for the American people."
House Speaker Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) issued a more general
statement condemning "any state-sponsored cyberattacks." But he
lined up with Mr. Trump in warning of the risk of altering the
outcome of the election. "As we work to protect our democracy from
foreign influence, we should not cast doubt on the clear and
decisive outcome of this election," Mr. Ryan said in a
statement.
The Obama administration also backed a congressional inquiry.
Josh Earnest, the White House spokesman, said there is no dispute
that Russia was behind the cyberattacks, and added that it appeared
clear the efforts were aimed at helping Mr. Trump, noting there had
been no leaks of Republicans' emails.
"You didn't need a security clearance to figure out who
benefited from malicious Russian cyberactivity," Mr. Earnest
said.
While investigations now appear certain, it remains unclear what
type of probe will take place, amid some divisions between
Republicans and Democrats. That decision also could determine which
findings ultimately are shared with the public.
Some Democrats favor an independent panel patterned after the
commission that probed the Sept. 11 attacks.
The Senate intelligence panel, which Mr. McConnell suggested
should be in charge, normally conducts hearings in secret. The
committee never released in full its lengthy probe of harsh
interrogation methods used by the CIA. Its members already have
been briefed in closed sessions on the information collected by
intelligence agencies that points to Russia.
Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and John
McCain of Arizona, both longtime Russia hawks, have said they
intend to launch an investigation via the Senate Armed Services
Committee, which Mr. McCain chairs.
On Sunday, Mr. McCain said on CBS's "Face the Nation" that in an
ideal world, the Senate would establish a select committee to look
into Russian hacking, but that setting it up would take a long
time.
Democrats have said more information needs to be disclosed
urgently and have called on the Obama administration to disclose
the findings of a review that the White House ordered intelligence
agencies to undertake. President Barack Obama has said he expects
that probe to wrap up before he leaves office on Jan. 20.
"The seriousness of the Russian meddling…during our presidential
election merits a bicameral and bipartisan congressional
investigation," Rep. Adam Schiff (D., Calif.), the ranking member
of the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement. Mr.
Schiff said the joint inquiry should include public hearings,
similar to those held after the Sept. 11 attacks, and should
develop a plan for "deterring the Russians from further malignant
cyberaction and inoculating the public against such manipulation in
the future."
But the intelligence panel's Republican chairman, Rep. Devin
Nunes of California, has said there was no need for further
investigations, though he wrote intelligence officials on Monday to
demand they brief his committee on the shifting assessments of the
cyberhacking, citing recent news reports. Mr. Nunes, who is also an
adviser to the Trump transition team, had previously said he has
seen no evidence that the hacks were meant to help Mr. Trump win
the election, a position directly at odds with Mr. Schiff, who has
said they plainly were.
Byron Tau
Write to Siobhan Hughes at siobhan.hughes@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
December 13, 2016 01:45 ET (06:45 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2016 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
CBS (NYSE:CBS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
CBS (NYSE:CBS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024