Obama Administration Draws Criticism Over Iran Investment Policy
October 09 2016 - 9:50PM
Dow Jones News
WASHINGTON—New U.S. guidelines on foreign investment in Iran
sparked concerns that the measures would benefit Tehran's elite
military unit, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
Senior Obama administration officials have said they are hoping
Iran's economic reintegration into the global economy could help
cement last year's nuclear deal and strengthen President Hassan
Rouhani, viewed as a relative political moderate.
On Friday, the Treasury Department released updated guidelines
that indicated Washington wouldn't seek to sanction foreign
companies doing business with blacklisted Iranian entities,
provided they maintain only minority interests in ventures.
"It is not necessarily sanctionable for a non-U.S. person to
engage in transactions with an entity that is not on the [sanctions
list] but that is minority owned, or that is controlled in whole or
in part, by an Iranian or Iran-related person on the [list]," the
guidelines say.
U.S. law bans Iranian banks and companies from conducting
business through the American financial system. But Treasury
clarified in its guidance that Tehran could legally gain access to
dollars through non-U.S. banks and institutions, provided they have
no direct contact with the U.S. financial system.
"Foreign financial institutions, including foreign-incorporated
subsidiaries of U.S. financial institutions, may process
transactions denominated in U.S. dollars or maintain U.S.
dollar-denominated accounts that involve Iran or persons ordinarily
resident in Iran," the Treasury guidelines say.
The new guidelines sparked criticism from Republican lawmakers
over the weekend.
"The new guidance overturns the long-running understanding that
the U.S. dollar cannot be used to facilitate international trade
with any Iranian entities, let alone sanctioned entities. And by
allowing foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies to transact
business with Iranian entities, the president is ignoring the clear
text of a law passed by Congress," Sen. Tom Cotton (R., Ark.) said
on Sunday.
Sen. Mark Kirk of Illinois, who chairs a Senate banking
committee with oversight over Iran sanctions law, said the new
guidelines amounted to the White House granting Tehran new
concessions.
Meanwhile, Rep. Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) said Treasury's changes
"green-light business with terrorists. The updated FAQs remove
barriers for foreigners to engage with firms the Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps controls. From this and other
appeasements, it appears the Obama administration has given up on
any democratic or pro-Western future for Iran."
Treasury has sought to dissuade foreign companies from doing
business with the IRGC, which is widely viewed as the most dominant
player in Iran's economy. The U.S. has designated dozens of IRGC
companies over the past decade for their alleged roles in funding
international terrorism, arms trafficking and committing
human-rights abuses against Iranian citizens.
Iranian officials have increasingly complained that the U.S. has
undercut Tehran's business prospects and the nuclear agreement by
maintaining bilateral sanctions.
Treasury officials said on Sunday that their new guidance
doesn't amount to a concession and is part of the department's
regular review of its sanctions programs.
In recent weeks, the administration has approved the sale of
dozens of Boeing Co. commercial aircraft to Iran, in the biggest
transaction between the two countries since the 1979 Islamic
revolution. The White House has indicated the U.S. might support
Tehran's bid to join the World Trade Organization.
Still, allies of the White House in promoting the nuclear deal
are pressing President Barack Obama to do more in his final months
in office, including establishing a direct financial channel
between the U.S. and Iran. They played down the overall impact of
Treasury's new guidelines.
"We should not ignore the fact that the United States is unique
in the world in continuing to impose a comprehensive trade and
investment embargo with Iran despite resolution of the nuclear
issue," said Tyler Cullis of the National Iranian American
Council.
A number of former U.S. Treasury officials, however, have voiced
increasing fears in recent weeks that the Obama administration was
significantly weakening Washington's ability to exert financial
pressure on Iran.
They said Tehran has done nothing since last year's nuclear
agreement to reduce its support for militant groups in the Middle
East and said Iran remains a central player in fueling Syria's
civil war.
"The administration seems to be doing everything possible—from
roadshows to new interpretations of regulations—to encourage
business with Iran," said Juan Zarate, who served as a senior
Treasury and White House official in the George W. Bush
administration. "At a time of growing concern about Iran's
adventurism, support to terrorism, and clerical and IRGC control of
the economy, this seems to be a moment for the U.S. and the world
to be applying even more scrutiny—not less."
Write to Jay Solomon at jay.solomon@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
October 09, 2016 21:35 ET (01:35 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2016 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Boeing (NYSE:BA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Boeing (NYSE:BA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024