BVTK Bravatek Solutions Inc (CE)

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2016

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 - Nature of Operations 

Bravatek Solutions, Inc. a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), was incorporated on April 19, 2007. Effective September 29, 2015, the Company changed its name to “Bravatek Solutions, Inc.” in order to better reflect the Company’s expanding operations and strategy. The Company’s business operations are oriented around the marketing and distribution of proprietary and allied security, defense and information security software, tools and systems, including telecom services. Solutions span a diverse variety of world-wide markets including, but not limited to, email security, user authentication, telecommunications and cyber breach protection.

NOTE 2 - Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation 

The accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared by the Company without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the stated periods have been made. Except as described below, these adjustments consist only of normal and recurring adjustments. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. These condensed unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with a reading of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2016, filed with the SEC on July 21, 2017. Interim results of operations for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 are not necessarily indicative of future results for the full year. Certain amounts from the 2015 period have been reclassified to conform to the presentation used in the current period.

Use of Estimates 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. 

Such estimates and assumptions impact both assets and liabilities, including but not limited to: net realizable value of accounts receivable, estimated useful lives and potential impairment of property and equipment, the valuation of intangible assets, estimate of fair value of share based payments and derivative liabilities, estimates of fair value of warrants issued and recorded as debt discount, estimates of tax liabilities and estimates of the probability and potential magnitude of contingent liabilities. 

Making estimates requires management to exercise significant judgment. It is at least reasonably possible that the estimate of the effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the date of the financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate could change in the near-term due to one or more future non-conforming events. Accordingly, actual results could differ significantly from estimates. 

Fiscal Year

The Company’s fiscal year-end is March 31. 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost and represent cash on hand, demand deposits placed with banks or other financial institutions and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. The Company had no cash equivalents.

Sales Concentration and credit risk

Following is a summary of customers who accounted for more than ten percent (10%) of the Company’s revenues for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, and 2015:

There were no accounts receivable balances as of December 31, 2016.

Accounts Receivable/Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company records its client receivables and unbilled services at their face amounts less allowances. On a periodic basis, the Company evaluates its receivables and unbilled services and establishes allowances based on historical experience and other currently available information. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, management determined there was no need to establish an allowance for doubtful accounts because there had been little history of nonpayment or indicators of credit risk, such as bankruptcy.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

Depreciation of property and equipment is provided utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives, ranging from 5-7 years of the respective assets. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations. 

Depreciation expense was $2,378 and $6,643 for the three and nine months December 31, 2016, respectively, and $3,403 and $8,666 for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015, respectively.

Long-Lived Assets 

The Company reviews long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets held and used for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In evaluating the fair value and future benefits of its intangible assets, management performs an analysis of the anticipated undiscounted future net cash flow of the individual assets over the remaining amortization period. The Company recognizes an impairment loss if the carrying value of the asset exceeds the expected future cash flows.

Income Taxes 

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes, as clarified by ASC 740-10, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. Under this method, deferred income taxes are determined based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities given the provisions of enacted tax laws. Deferred income tax provisions and benefits are based on changes to the assets or liabilities from year to year. In providing for deferred taxes, the Company considers tax regulations of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates, estimates of future taxable income, and available tax planning strategies. If tax regulations, operating results or the ability to implement tax-planning strategies vary, adjustments to the carrying value of deferred tax assets and liabilities may be required. Valuation allowances are recorded related to deferred tax assets based on the “more likely than not” criteria of ASC 740. 

ASC 740-10 requires that the Company recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the “more-likely-than-not” threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. 

Software Development Costs

Costs for software developed for internal use are accounted for through the capitalization of those costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining internal-use software. Capitalized costs for internal-use software are included in intangible assets in the consolidated balance sheet. Capitalized software development costs are amortized over three years.

Costs incurred during the preliminary project along with post-implementation stages of internal use computer software development and costs incurred to maintain existing product offerings are expensed as incurred. The capitalization and ongoing assessment of recoverability of development costs require considerable judgment by management with respect to certain external factors, including, but not limited to, technological and economic feasibility and estimated economic life. During the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred no capitalized software development costs. Capitalized software is amortized over the software’s estimated economic life of 3 years. For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, and 2015, amortization expense for capitalized software development was $5,072 and $15,159, respectively.

Research and Development

Costs and expenses that can be clearly identified as research and development (“R&D”) are charged to expense as incurred in accordance with GAAP. All research and development costs have been expensed as incurred, totaling $6,254 and $27,748 for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, respectively, and $52,626 and $460,875 for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015, respectively. For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the Company had no development costs required to be capitalized under ASC 985-20,  Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed,  and under ASC 350-40,  Internal-Use Software.

Advertising and Promotions  

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, were $350 and $26,074, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015, were $47,129 and $105,778, respectively. Advertising expenses of $23,625 for the nine months ended December 31, 2016 were the result of barter transactions, whereby, the Company received advertising and promotional services in exchange for sales of software.

Advertising and Revenue Barter Transactions

The Company recognized revenue and expense, in accordance with ASC 845 - Nonmonetary Transactions, at fair value only if the fair value of the advertising received is determinable based in the entity’s own historical practice of receiving cash or other consideration that is readily convertible to a known amount of cash for similar advertising from buyers unrelated to the Company. If the fair value of the advertising received is not determinable within these limits, the barter transaction would be recorded based on the carrying amount of the advertising received, which likely will be zero.

Uncertainty as a Going Concern 

The accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations since inception (April 19, 2007) through December 31, 2016 of $19,362,500 and has a working capital deficit of $5,521,812 as of December 31, 2016, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. 

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate profitable operations in the future and/or obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management has plans to seek additional capital through a private placement and public offering of its common stock. These plans, if successful, will mitigate the factors which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from this uncertainty. 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company measures assets and liabilities at fair value based on an expected exit price as defined by the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements, which represents the amount that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability, as the case may be, in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value may be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The authoritative guidance on fair value measurements establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis whereby inputs, used in valuation techniques, are assigned a hierarchical level. 

The following are the hierarchical levels of inputs to measure fair value: 

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, certain notes payable and notes payable - related party, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. 

The following table represents the Company’s financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, for each fair value hierarchy level:

Embedded Conversion Features

The Company evaluates embedded conversion features within convertible debt under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” to determine whether the embedded conversion feature(s) should be bifurcated from the host instrument and accounted for as a derivative at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in earnings. If the conversion feature does not require derivative treatment under ASC 815, the instrument is evaluated under ASC 470-20 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options” for consideration of any beneficial conversion feature. 

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of it financial instruments, including stock purchase warrants, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to income. 

For option-based simple derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. 

Debt Issue Costs and Debt Discount

The Company may record debt issue costs and/or debt discounts in connection with raising funds through the issuance of debt. These costs may be paid in the form of cash, or equity (such as warrants). These costs are amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt. If a conversion of the underlying debt occurs prior to maturity a proportionate share of the unamortized amounts is immediately expensed. 

Original Issue Discount

For certain convertible debt issued, the Company may provide the debt holder with an original issue discount. The original issue discount would be recorded to debt discount, reducing the face amount of the note and is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt. If a conversion of the underlying debt occurs prior to maturity a proportionate share of the unamortized amounts is immediately expensed. 

Extinguishments of Liabilities

The Company accounts for extinguishments of liabilities in accordance with ASC 860-10 (formerly SFAS 140) “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities.” When the conditions are met for extinguishment accounting, the liabilities are derecognized and the gain or loss on the sale is recognized. 

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue and gains when earned and related costs of sales and expenses when incurred. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Section 605-10-S99, Revenue Recognition, Overall, SEC Materials (“Section 605-10-S99”). Section 605-10-S99 requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services rendered; (3) the fee is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Cost of products sold consists of the cost of the purchased goods and labor related to the corresponding sales transaction. The Company recognizes revenue from services at the time the services are completed.

Stock-Based Compensation - Employees

The Company accounts for its stock based compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.

The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows: 

Generally, all forms of share-based payments, including stock option grants, warrants and restricted stock grants and stock appreciation rights are measured at their fair value on the awards’ grant date, based on estimated number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. 

The expense resulting from share-based payments is recorded in general and administrative expense in the statements of operations. 

Stock-Based Compensation – Non-Employees

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”). 

Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows: 

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services. Section 505-50-30 provides guidance on the determination of the measurement date for transactions that are within the scope of this Subtopic. 

Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a share option and similar instrument that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised. 

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded. 

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions. 

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a) affiliates of the Company; b) Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825-10-15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d) principal owners of the Company; e) management of the Company; f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g) Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. 

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d) amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement. 

Net Earnings (Loss) per Share 

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with FASB ASC 260, “Earnings per Share” ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the statement of operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period including stock options, using the treasury stock method, and convertible notes and stock warrants, using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options, warrants and conversion of convertible notes. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015, and for the nine months ended December 31, 2016, all potential common shares were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because their impact was anti-dilutive. The following table illustrates the computation of basic and diluted EPS for the three months ended December 31, 2016:

Securities that could potentially dilute basic EPS in the future, that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented, consist of the following:

NOTE 3 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, requiring an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Early adoption is not permitted. The updated standard is effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. However, in April 2015, the FASB approved to defer the effective date by one year which we will evaluate if approved. Further, we have not yet selected a transition method and we are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

On August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which requires management to evaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued and to provide related disclosures. ASU 2014-15 is effective for us for our fiscal year ending March 31, 2017 and for interim periods thereafter. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.

With the exception of the new standard discussed above, there have been no other recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements during the quarter ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the recent accounting pronouncements described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, that are of significance or potential significance to us.

NOTE 4 - Related Party Activity

Revenues

For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, related party sales were $50,334 and $145,362, respectively, representing sales of 100% and 71%, respectively, for each period. The party was temporarily a related party based on the percentage of shares owned by management of the related, of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company at the time of the sales. The party is no longer a related party. For the nine months ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded sales to three related party companies in the amounts of $126,148, $59,404 and $1,750, respectively. The sales of $1,750 were to a limited liability company controlled by our chief executive officer (“CEO”). Total related party revenues for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2015 was $465 and $187,302, respectively.

Notes payable

The Company issued multiple unsecured notes payable from June 27, 2015 to December 31, 2016, to the Company’s CEO, for amounts advanced to the Company, or paid by the CEO, on behalf of the Company, totaling $183,608 and the Company has made repayments of $51,758. The notes carry interest at 10% per annum and are due on demand. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the principal balance of the notes was $131,850 and $105,000 (included in note payable related party in the balance sheets presented herein), and included in accrued interest related party is the accrued and unpaid interest as of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, of $19,862 and $11,550, respectively. For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded interest expense related party of $3,033 and $8,312, respectively.

Included in the CEO’s compensation for the nine months ended December 31, 2016, is a credit of $28,000, whereby the CEO agreed to reduce past amounts due. As of December 31, 2016, included in accounts payable - related party is $201,000 and $22,750, for amounts owed the Company’s CEO and CFO, respectively, for unpaid fees.

NOTE 5 - Notes Payable 

From May 18, 2010 through June 27, 2013, the Company issued in the aggregate $558,500 of unsecured notes payable to a Nevada corporation, lender and preferred shareholder of the Company (“Global”). The notes bear interest at 10%, compounded annually and $553,000 and $5,500 matured on November 30, 2014, and June 27, 2015, respectively. On February 16, 2015, the Company secured extensions on all of the notes that matured on November 30, 2014 through April 1, 2015, with no change in original terms of the agreement.

On June 15, 2015, Company entered into a  Settlement Agreement and Partial Waiver and Release  (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Global. Global owned 2,377,500 shares of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, and is the holder of outstanding promissory notes in the original principal amount of $558,500, with accrued interest thereon due to Global of approximately $267,960 (the “Global Notes”) immediately prior to the Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Global agreed to (1) waive interest due of $267,960 under the Global Notes and $158,500 of principal, such that only $400,000 of principal and interest would be considered outstanding as of the settlement agreement date, and (2) immediately return all of the Preferred Stock to the Company for cancellation, in consideration for the Company issuing 856 shares of common stock to Global. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the note balance was $400,000. As of June 15, 2015, the note is payable on demand as part of the Settlement Agreement. Accrued interest as of December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2016 was $40,110.

The Company issued five notes from December 18, 2012 to May 30, 2013 totaling $199,960 in unsecured notes payable to a third party. The notes bear an interest rate of 10%, compounded annually and matured from December 18, 2014 through May 30, 2015. On February 16, 2015, the Company secured a notes payable extension through April 1, 2015, with no change in original terms of the agreements. The notes payable were again extended on August 6, 2015, through January 1, 2016, with no change in original terms of the agreement. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the note balance was $199,960 and the notes are currently in default. Accrued interest as of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, was $72,786 and $62,788, respectively.

The Company issued six notes from July 12, 2013 to June 16, 2014, totaling $230,828 in unsecured notes payable to a third party. The notes bear an interest rate of 10%, compounded annually and matured from July 12, 2014 through June 16, 2015. On February 16, 2015, the Company secured a notes payable extension through April 1, 2015, with no change in original terms of the agreements. The notes payable were again extended on August 6, 2015, through January 1, 2016, with no change in original terms of the agreements. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016 the note balance was $230,828 and the notes are currently in default Accrued interest as of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, was $68,994 and $51,682, respectively

On June 2, 2015, as part of the Asset Purchase Agreement with DCI, the Company assumed limited liabilities associated with Viking (loan payment for Chevrolet truck in the amount of $668 per month with a principal balance of $36,202, and a loan payment to Joshua Claybaugh of $5,000 per month for 11 months for a total of $55,000). The Chevrolet truck loan was paid off as of March 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the loan with Joshua Claybaugh had a remaining principal balance of $20,000. There was no accrued interest as of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016.

The Company entered into a Senior Secured Credit Facility Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) dated June 30, 2015 with TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (“TCA”) that was executed on June 30, 2015 and made effective as of November 25, 2015, which was to allow the Company to borrow up to $3,000,000. The Credit Agreement bears interest at 18%, compounded annually, and matured on January 25, 2017. The loan is secured against all existing and after-acquired tangible and intangible assets of the Company. On November 25, 2015, the Company received $310,600, net of loan costs and fees of $39,400. In connection with the Credit Agreement, the Company issued 1,412 shares of common stock upon execution valued by TCA at $75,000 as an advisory fee payment. The Company recorded the advisory fee and loan cost and fees of $114,400 as a discount to the TCA note and is amortizing the costs over the maturity of the note. Accordingly, for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016, the Company expensed $24,514 and $73,543, respectively, included in amortization of debt discount in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations presented herein. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the TCA loan had a principal balance of $323,162. Interest expense for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2016 was $14,542 and $43,967, respectively. Accrued interest as of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, was $29,085 and $0, respectively.

A summary of the notes payable balance as of December 31, 2016, is as follows:

The following is a roll-forward of the Company’s notes payable and related discounts for the nine months ended December 31, 2016:

On September 6, 2016, TCA commenced an action against the Company and the Company’s CEO, Dr. Cellucci, as “validity guarantor,” filed in the Circuit Court of the 17 ^th  Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida, for amounts owed to TCA by the Company under their revolving credit agreement with the Company. On April 21, 2017, the Company, Dr. Cellucci and TCA executed a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed to pay $2,500 by April 30, 2017, $2,500 by May 31, 2017 and $405,357 on or before June 16, 2017. The Company fully complied with its obligations under the settlement agreement, paying TCA all amounts owed thereunder within the times required, and the case has now been dismissed.

NOTE 6 - Convertible Notes Payable

The Company accounted for the following Notes under ASC Topic 815-15 “Embedded Derivative.” The derivative component of the obligation are initially valued and classified as a derivative liability with an offset to discounts on convertible debt, with any excess of the fair value of the derivative component over the face amount of the note recorded as an expense on the issue date. Discounts have been amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the related notes.

On December 19, 2014, the Company issued a convertible note payable, with a face value of $156,000 and stated interest of 8% to a third-party investor. The note is convertible, at any time following the funding of the note, into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 68% of the lowest closing bid price for 20 days prior to conversion. For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the investor converted a total of $12,380 of the face value and $2,332 of accrued interest into 6,593,919 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $1,125 and $13,505, respectively.

On December 19, 2014, the Company issued a convertible back end note, with a face value of $156,000 and stated interest of 8% to a third-party investor. The note is convertible at any time following the funding of the note, convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 68% of the lowest closing bid price for 20 days prior to conversion. The note was funded on June 18, 2015, when the Company received proceeds of $143,333, net of $12,663 of OID and costs. For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the investor converted a total of $18,500 of the face value and $3,070 of accrued interest into 248,836,126 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $137,500 and $156,000, respectively.

On December 19, 2014, the Company issued a convertible note payable, with a face value of $156,000 and stated interest of 8% to a third-party investor. The outstanding balance of this note is convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 67% of the lowest closing bid price for 20 days prior to conversion. For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the investor converted a total of $9,073 of the face value into 39,601,275 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $49,427 and $58,500, respectively.

On December 19, 2014, the Company issued a convertible back end note, with a face value of $156,000 and stated interest of 8% to a third-party investor. The note is convertible at any time following the funding of the note, convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 68% of the lowest closing bid price for 20 days prior to conversion. The note was funded on June 18, 2015, when the Company received proceeds of $143,333, net of $12,663 of OID and costs. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $156,000.

On January 11, 2015, the Company issued two convertible promissory notes in the principal amount of $52,000 each. One of the notes was funded on January 13, 2015, with the Company receiving $47,500 of net proceeds after payment of legal and origination expenses. The note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum, was due and payable on January 9, 2015, and may be converted at any time after funding into shares of Company common stock at a conversion price equal to 67% of the lowest closing bid price on the OTCQB during the 15 prior trading days. The second note, which was funded on August 7, 2015, has the same interest and conversion terms as the first note, but may be offset by a secured promissory note issued to the Company for $50,000, due on September 9, 2015, and accruing interest at the rate of 8% per annum. For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the investor converted a total of $25,040 of the face value and $2,815 of accrued interest into 183,304,767 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the second note was $26,960 and $52,000, respectively.

On January 19, 2015, the Company issued a convertible promissory note in the face amount of $100,000, which bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum, was due and payable on July 16, 2015, and may be converted at any time after funding into shares of Company common stock at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (a) 55% of the lowest trading price during the 20 days preceding the execution of the note, or (b) 55% of the of the lowest traded price during the 20 trading days preceding conversion. The note was funded on January 28, 2015, with the Company receiving $93,000 of net proceeds after payment of legal and origination expenses. For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the investor converted a total of $20,528 of the face value into 210,312,824 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $38,295 and $58,823, respectively.

On January 21, 2015, the Company issued a convertible promissory note in the face amount of $400,000, of which the Company is to assume $40,000 in original interest discount (“OID”), which together with any unpaid accrued interest is due two years after any funding of the note. The note is to be funded at the note holder’s discretion, and the initial tranche was funded on January 21, 2015, when the Company received cash in the amount of $50,000, and received an additional $25,000 on April 28, 2015. The note is pre-payable for 90 days without interest, and incurs a one-time interest charge of 12% thereafter. The note balance funded (plus a pro rata portion of the OID together with any unpaid accrued interest) is convertible into shares of Company common stock at a conversion price equal to the lesser of $0.08 or 60% of the lowest traded price during the 25 prior trading days. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $15,480.

On August 17, 2015, the Company issued a convertible promissory note in the face amount of $325,000, which bears interest at the rate of 10% per annum, was due and payable on August 17, 2016, and may be converted at any time after funding into shares of Company common stock at a conversion price equals the lesser of $.02 or 70% of the closing trading prices immediately preceding the conversion date. In conjunction with the convertible note issued by the Company, the Company issued 2,064 warrants valued at $412,698. The warrants have an exercise price of $270, subject to adjustment, and expire on August 17, 2020. For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the investor converted a total of $18,642 of accrued and unpaid interest into 250,574,242 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $325,000.

On October 12, 2015, the Company issued a replacement convertible promissory note in the face amount of $110,351, to Carebourn Capital LP (“Carebourn”) that replaces the convertible promissory note issued on April 10, 2015, with a face value of $105,000, and accrued interest of $5,351. The outstanding balance of this note is convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 60% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices for 20 days prior to conversion. The note also bears an interest rate of 10% per annum. For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the investor converted a total of $24,308 of the face value into 86,266,028 shares of common stock. Additionally, Carebourn assigned $10,000 of the note to Carebourn Partners. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $-0- and $34,308, respectively.

Also on October 12, 2015, Carebourn and the Company assigned $15,000 of the replacement issued to Carebourn, to More Capital, LLC. (“More Capital”). The outstanding balance of this note is convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 60% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices for 20 days prior to conversion. The note also bears an interest rate of 10% per annum. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $2,050.

On October 26, 2015, the Company issued a convertible note, with a face value of $110,000 and stated interest of 10% to a third-party investor, of which the company was to assume an OID of $10,000. The outstanding balance of this note was convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 60% of the lowest average of the three lowest closing bid prices for 20 days prior to conversion. The investor sold $25,000 of the note on April 27, 2016, and the Company issued a replacement note to the buyer, as described below. On June 7, 2016, the Company and the third-party investor agreed to extend the maturity of the note from July 26, 2016 to October 26, 2016, and to require daily payments of $250 per day via ACH. For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the Company paid $6,003 of the note. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $78,997 and $110,000, respectively.

On October 27, 2015, the Company issued a convertible note, with a face value of $110,000 and stated interest of 8% to a third-party investor, of which the company was to assume an OID of $10,000. The outstanding balance of this note was convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 60% of the lowest average of the three lowest closing bid prices for 20 days prior to conversion. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $110,000.

On November 12, 2015, the Company issued a replacement convertible promissory note in the face amount of $47,808, to Carebourn that replaces the collateralized secured convertible promissory issued on February 3, 2015, that had a remaining face value of $43,479 and accrued interest of $4,326. The replacement note is convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 60% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices for 20 days prior to conversion. The note also bears an interest rate of 10% per annum. . For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the investor converted a total of $1,724 of the face value into 28,741,200 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $46,084 and $47,808, respectively.

On November 27, 2015, the Company issued a convertible note for legal services previously provided with a face value of $27,000 and stated interest of 10% to a third-party investor. The note is convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 70% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices for 10 days prior to conversion. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $27,000.

On January 5, 2016, the Company issued a convertible note for legal services previously provided with a face value of $20,000 and stated interest of 10% to a third-party investor. The note is convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 70% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices for 10 days prior to conversion. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $20,000.

On February 4, 2016, the Company issued a convertible note, with a face value of $82,500 and stated interest of 8% to a third-party investor, LG Capital Funding LLC (“LG”), of which the Company was to assume an OID of $7,500, and stated interest of 8% to a third-party investor. The outstanding balance of this note is convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 60% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices for 20 days prior to conversion. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $82,500. The Company’s CEO agreed to guarantee this note by pledging 111,884 shares of his Series C Preferred Stock.

On February 8, 2016, the Company issued a convertible note, with a face value of $80,000 and stated interest of 10% to a third-party investor, Carebourn, of which the Company was to assume an original issue discount of $5,000. The outstanding balance of this note is convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 60% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices for 20 days prior to conversion and a maturity date of November 8, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $80,000. On March 23, 2016, as collateral security for this note and the $110,351 convertible promissory note entered into with Carebourn on October 12, 2015, the Company’s CEO agreed to pledge 111,884 shares of his Series C Preferred Stock.

On March 24, 2016, the Company issued a convertible note, with a face value of $19,000 and stated interest of 10% to a third-party investor, Carebourn, of which the company received $16,000 in proceeds. The outstanding balance of this note is convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 60% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices for 20 days prior to conversion and matured on December 24, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $19,000.

On March 24, 2016, the Company issued a convertible note, with a face value of $18,000 and stated interest of 10% to a third-party investor, of which the Company received $15,000 in proceeds. The outstanding balance of this note is convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 60% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices for 20 days prior to conversion and a maturity date of December 24, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $18,000.

On April 11, 2016, the Company issued a convertible note, with a face value of $18,889 and stated interest of 10% to a third-party investor. The note is convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 60% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices for 20 days prior to conversion. The Company received proceeds of $13,000 on April 28, 2016, of $13,000, after disbursements for the lender’s transaction costs, fees, and expenses. The embedded feature included in the note resulted in an initial debt discount of $17,000 an initial derivative liability expense of $11,880 and an initial derivative liability of $28,880. As of December 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the note was $18,889.

On April 11, 2016, the Company issued a replacement convertible promissory note in the face amount of $26,123, to a third-party investor that replaces part of the convertible promissory note issued on October 26, 2015, with a face value of $25,000, and accrued interest of $1,123. The outstanding balance of this note is convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 60% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices for 20 days prior to conversion. The note also bears an interest rate of 10% per annum. For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the investor converted a total of $10,596 of the face value and $2,842 of accrued interest and fees into 200,215,238 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the replacement note was $15,527.

On June 3, 2016, the Company issued a convertible note, with a face value of $42,350 and stated interest of 12% to a third-party investor. The note is convertible into a variable number of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion ratio of 60% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices for 20 days prior to conversion. The Company received proceeds on June 3, 2016, of $35,000, after disbursements for the lender’s transaction costs, fees, and expenses. The embedded feature included in the note resulted in an initial debt discount of $38,500, an initial derivative liability expense of $28,173 and an initial derivative liability of $66,673. The note also requires 177 daily payments of $239 per day via ACH. For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the Company paid $6,003 of the note. The balance of the note as of December 31, 2016 was $36,129.

A summary of the convertible notes payable balance as of December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2016 is as follows:

The following is a roll-forward of the Company’s convertible notes and related discounts for the nine months ended December 31, 2016:

NOTE 7 - Derivative Liabilities

The Company determined that the conversion features of the convertible notes represented embedded derivatives since the Notes are convertible into a variable number of shares upon conversion. Accordingly, the notes are not considered to be conventional debt under EITF 00-19 and the embedded conversion feature is bifurcated from the debt host and accounted for as a derivative liability. Accordingly, the fair value of these derivative instruments are recorded as liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet with the corresponding amount recorded as a discount to each Note, with any excess of the fair value of the derivative component over the face amount of the note recorded as an expense on the issue date. Such discounts are amortized from the date of issuance to the maturity dates of the Notes. The change in the fair value of the derivative liabilities are recorded in other income or expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations at the end of each period, with the offset to the derivative liabilities on the balance sheet.

The Company valued the derivative liabilities at December 31, 2016, and March 31, 2016, at $2,144,913 and $1,955,721, respectively. The Company used the Monte Carlo simulation valuation model with the following assumptions for the nine months ended December 31, 2016; a risk-free interest rates from 0.51% to 0.63% and volatility of 317% to 327%, trading prices.

A summary of the activity related to derivative liabilities for the nine months ended on December 31, 2016 is as follows:

Derivative liability expense of $391,263 for the nine months ended December 31, 2016, consisted of the initial derivative expense of $40,053 and the above fair value change of $351,209.

NOTE 8 - Stockholders’ Deficit

Common stock

On June 17, 2016, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) announced the registrant’s 1:2,500 reverse stock split of the registrant’s common stock. The reverse stock split took effect on June 20, 2016. Unless otherwise noted, impacted amounts and share information included in the financial statements and notes thereto have been retroactively adjusted for the stock split as if such stock split occurred on the first day of the first period presented. Certain amounts in the notes to the financial statements may be slightly different than previously reported due to rounding of fractional shares as a result of the reverse stock split.

During the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 1,254,445,618 shares of common stock for conversion of $122,150 of principal and $33,573 of accrued interest, for a total of $155,693 (see Note 6).

On August 1, 2016, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with YKTG, LLC (“YKTG”), pursuant to which YKTG would, in consideration of the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of Company common stock, assist in the selection and management of subcontractors for new and forthcoming POs from major telecom carries (Verizon, Sprint, AT&T, etc.), offer PMO skills, systems, tools, and advice to the Company and the Company’s strategic alliance partners, provide sales personnel and management to assist the Company with obtaining additional telecom purchase orders, provide sales leads for government telecom applications, assist the Company to drive sales for its existing indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (“IDIQ”) contracts, and assist the Company in updating its five-year strategic business plan. On August 3, 2016, the Company issued the 10,000,000 shares to YKTG. The Company valued the shares at $0.0071 per share (the market price on the date of the consulting agreement), and recorded stock compensation expense of $71,000 for the nine months ended December 31, 2016.

As of December 31, 2016, there are 1,265,448,353 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and 1,221 shares of common stock to be issued.

Preferred Stock

10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value have been authorized.

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock .

5,000,000 shares of preferred stock are designated as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (Series A Preferred Stock”). Each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible at the election of the holder into 0.004 shares of common stock, subject to a 4.9% beneficial ownership limitation, but has no voting rights until converted into common stock. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, whether voluntary or involuntary, the holders of the outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock shall be entitled to be paid out of the assets of the Corporation available for distribution to its shareholders, whether from capital, surplus funds or earnings, and before any payment is made in respect of the shares of Common Stock, an amount equal to $2.50 per share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to adjustment for stock dividends, combinations, splits, recapitalizations and the like with respect to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, plus any and all accrued but unpaid dividends. The holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to dividends when declared by the board of directors. As of December 31, 2016, there are no shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding.

Series B Preferred Stock

350,000 shares of preferred stock are designated as Series B Preferred Stock. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible at the election of the holder into .004 shares of common stock, subject to a 4.9% beneficial ownership limitation. Series B Preferred Stock has no voting rights until converted into common stock. The holders of the Series B Preferred Stock do not have any rights to dividends or any liquidation preferences. As of December 31, 2016, there are 264,503 shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding.

Series C Preferred Stock

1,000,000 shares of preferred stock are designated as Series C Preferred Stock. Each share of Series C Preferred Stock, as amended, is convertible at the election of the holder into 100 shares of common stock, and entitles the holder thereof to 10,000 votes on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Company. The holders of the Series C Preferred Stock do not have any rights to dividends or any liquidation preferences. As of December 31, 2016, there are 319,768 shares of Series C preferred stock outstanding, of which 223,768 shares are owned by our Chairman and CEO, Dr. Cellucci. As collateral security on certain obligations of the Company, Dr. Cellucci has pledged all of his shares of Series C Preferred Stock to holders of certain convertible promissory notes (see Note 6).

Stock Options

For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the Company did not issue any stock options, and there were no exercises of any existing stock options. For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded an expense of $5,380 for the vesting of previously issued options. All option grants are 100% vested. The following table summarizes activities related to stock options of the Company for the nine months ended December 31, 2016:

The following table summarizes stock option information as of December 31, 2016:

Warrants

For the nine months ended December 31, 2016, the Company did not grant any warrants, and there were no exercises of any existing warrants. The following table summarizes the activity related to warrants of the Company for the nine months ended December 31, 2016:

NOTE 9 - Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

The Company is not a party to any significant pending legal proceedings other than as disclosed below, and no other such proceedings are known to be contemplated. No director, officer or affiliate of the Company and no owner of record or beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of the securities of the Company, or any associate of any such director, officer or security holder is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to the Company in reference to pending litigation.

On January 27, 2016, one of the Company’s creditors, JSJ Investments Inc. (“JSJ”), sent a demand for payment of amounts allegedly owed by the Company to JSJ pursuant to a convertible note dated January 19, 2015, in the original principal amount of $100,000, and threatening potential legal action against the Company. Since that time, JSJ has continued to convert the note into shares of common stock and the parties are currently negotiating a settlement of the remaining amounts due under the note.

On September 6, 2016, TCA commenced an action against the Company and the Company’s CEO, Dr. Cellucci, as “validity guarantor,” filed in the Circuit Court of the 17 ^th  Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida, for amounts owed to TCA by the Company under their revolving credit agreement with the Company. On April 21, 2017, the Company, Dr. Cellucci and TCA executed a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed to pay $2,500 by April 30, 2017, $2,500 by May 31, 2017 and $405,357 on or before June 16, 2017. The Company fully complied with its obligations under the settlement agreement, paying TCA all amounts owed thereunder within the times required, and the case has now been dismissed.

Other

On August 8, 2016, the Company entered into a Master Subcontract Agreement (the “MSA”) and $8,400,000 purchase order with YKTG for decommissioning tower services for major telecom carriers.

On August 11, 2016, the Company received a $438,000 purchase order from JWH Telecommunications Inc. (“JWH”) relating to radio-swap tower services in Ohio. The purchase order remains open as the Company is capable of fulfilling this order and is awaiting detailed instructions from JWH on scheduling our crews for designated locations during specified dates within the USA. The Company cannot give any assurances that it will receive the detailed instructions regarding the purchase order.

On August 11, 2016, the Company received a $2,109,942 purchase order from JWH relating to LTE (Long-Term Evolution) tower services. The purchase order remains open as the Company is capable of fulfilling this order and is awaiting detailed instructions from JWH on scheduling our crews for designated locations during specified dates within the USA. The Company cannot give any assurances that it will receive the detailed instructions regarding the purchase order.