6
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting
of Shareholders to be held on
January
25
,
2018
ELEC
TION OF DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL NO. 1)
Nine directors will be elected at our
2018
annual meeting of shareholders for a term of one year expiring at the
2019
annual meeting, and will serve until their respective successors have been elected, or until their earlier resignation or removal. Each of the nominees for director was previously elected a director of the company by our shareholders.
Each nominee has indicated that he or she is willing to serve as a member of our Board, if elected, and our Board has no reason to believe that any nominee may become unable or unwilling to serve. In the event that a nominee should become unavailable for election for any reason, the shares represented by a properly executed and returned proxy will be voted for any substitute nominee who shall be designated by the current Board. There are no arrangements or understandings between any director or nominee for director and any other person pursuant to which such person was selected as a director or nominee for director of the company.
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has reviewed the qualifications and independence of the nominees for director and, with each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee abstaining as to himself or herself, has recommended each of the other nominees for election to our Board.
Board a
nd Committee Evaluations; Qualifications of Nominees
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews the composition and performance of our Board and Board committees and is responsible for recruiting, evaluating and recommending candidates to be presented for appointment, election or reelection to serve as members of our Board. Our Board and each Board committee conduct annual written self-evaluations to help ensure that our Board and Board committees have the appropriate number and mix of members, skills and experience
and the appropriate scope of activities
. These self-evaluations also provide Board and Board committee members with insight for enhancing the effectiveness of their meetings. In evaluating our Board, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has considered that our directors have a wide range of experience as senior executives of large publicly traded companies, and in the areas of investment banking, accounting, business education and business management consulting. In these positions, they have also gained experience and knowledge in core management skills that are important to their service on our Board, such as business-to-business distribution, supply chain management, mergers and acquisitions, strategic and financial planning, financial reporting, compliance, risk management, intellectual property matters and leadership development. Several of our directors also have experience serving on the boards of directors and board committees of other public companies, which provides them with an understanding of current corporate governance practices and trends and executive compensation matters. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also believes that our directors have other key attributes that are important to an effective board of directors, including the highest professional and personal ethics and values, a broad diversity of business experience and expertise, an understanding of our business and industry, a high level of education, broad-based business acumen and the ability to think strategically.
In furtherance of our ongoing self-evaluations by our Board and Board committees and in order to ensure that our Board continues to be comprised of board members with diverse and critical skills, we elected two new independent directors, Messrs. Kaufmann and Paladino, on
September
24, 2015. In addition, with the election of Messrs. Kaufmann and Paladino, we reviewed and changed our Board committee composition so that each of our independent directors is a member of no more than two of our Board committees, thereby enhancing committee member focus on committee matters.
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
7
In addition to the qualifications described above, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considered the specific skills and attributes described in the biographical details that follow in determining whether each individual nominee should serve on our Board.
2018
Nom
inees for Director
|
|
|
|
Nominee
|
Principal Occupation
|
Age
|
Director Since
|
Jonathan Byrnes
|
Senior Lecturer at Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
69
|
March 201
0
|
Roger Fradin
|
Operating Executive with The Carlyle Group
|
6
4
|
July 199
8
|
Erik Gershwind
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of the company
|
4
6
|
October 201
0
|
Louise Goeser
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Siemens S.A. de C.V.
|
6
4
|
January 200
9
|
Mitchell Jacobson
(Board Chair)
|
Non-executive Chairman of the Board of the company
|
6
6
|
October 199
5
|
Michael Kaufmann
|
Chief Financial Officer (Chief Executive Officer eff. 1/1/2018) of Cardinal Health, Inc.
|
55
|
September 201
5
|
Denis Kelly
|
Investment Banker at Scura Paley Securities LLC
|
6
8
|
April 199
6
|
Steven Paladino
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Henry Schein, Inc.
|
60
|
September 201
5
|
Philip Peller
(Lead Director)
|
Independent Director; Retired Partner of Arthur Andersen LLP
|
7
8
|
April 200
0
|
|
|
Jonathan Byrnes
|
Business Experience
|
Dr. Byrnes has been a Senior Lecturer at MIT since 1992. In this capacity, he has taught graduate courses in Supply Chain Management and Integrated Account Management and programs for business executives, and he has supervised thesis research. He has been president of Jonathan Byrnes & Co., a consulting company, since 1976, and Founding Chairman of Profit Isle, Inc., a software company, since 2009. Dr. Byrnes earned a doctorate at Harvard University, and is a former President of the Harvard Alumni Association. He also served a two-year term on Harvard University’s Advisory Committee on Shareholder Responsibility, and he is currently serving a three-year term on the Board of Directors of Harvard Magazine.
|
Specific Skills and Attributes
|
Dr. Byrnes is a recognized expert in the areas of supply chain and integrated account management, areas which are critical to industrial distribution. Dr. Byrnes provides our Board with key perspectives relating to our operations and business strategy.
|
8
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
Roger Fradin
|
Business Experience
|
Mr. Fradin has served as an Operating Executive with The Carlyle Group, a global alternative asset manager, since
February 201
7. Mr. Fradin served as Vice Chairman of Honeywell International Inc. from
April 201
4 until
February 201
7, after previously serving as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Automation and Control Solutions Division of Honeywell International Inc. from
January 200
4 until
April 201
4. Previously, he was President and CEO of the Security and Fire Solutions Division of Honeywell International Inc. From 1987 until 2000, Mr. Fradin served as the President of the ADEMCO Group.
|
Specific Skills and Attributes
|
Mr. Fradin’s operational expertise and broad experience as a senior executive of a major diversified technology and manufacturing company makes him a valued asset to the Board. In addition, he provides critical insight and perspective relating to our customer base.
|
Other Directorships
|
Mr. Fradin is also a director of Signode Industrial Group
(a private company), a director and member of the Audit Committee and Finance
Committee of Pitney Bowes Inc.,
and a director
and member of the Audit Committee
of Harris Corporation.
|
Erik Gershwind
|
Business Experience
|
Mr. Gershwind was appointed our President and Chief Executive Officer in
January 201
3. From
October 200
9 to
October 201
1, Mr. Gershwind served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and from
October 201
1 to
January 201
3, he served as our President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Gershwind was elected by the Board to serve as a director in
October 201
0. Previously, Mr. Gershwind served as our Senior Vice President, Product Management and Marketing from
December 200
5 and our Vice President of Product Management from
April 200
5. From
August 200
4 to
April 200
5, Mr. Gershwind served as Vice President of MRO and Inventory Management. Mr. Gershwind has held various positions of increasing responsibility in Product, e-Commerce and Marketing. Mr. Gershwind joined the company in 1996 as manager of our acquisition integration initiative.
|
Specific Skills and Attributes
|
Mr. Gershwind has held senior management positions responsible for key business functions of the company and is a key contributor to our current strategy and success. In addition, as our Chief Executive Officer, he brings critical perspectives to our Board on our strategic direction and growth strategy.
|
Family Relationship
|
Mr. Gershwind is the nephew of Mitchell Jacobson, our Non-executive Chairman of the Board, and the son of Marjorie Gershwind Fiverson, Mr. Jacobson’s sister. Mr. Jacobson and Ms. Gershwind Fiverson are also our principal shareholders. There are no other family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
9
|
|
Louise Goeser
|
Business Experience
|
Ms. Goeser is President and Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Siemens S.A. de C.V. and is responsible for Siemens Mesoamérica. Siemens Mesoamérica is the Mexican, Central American and Caribbean unit of multinational Siemens AG, a global engineering company operating in the industrial, energy and healthcare sectors. Prior to accepting this position in
March 200
9, Ms. Goeser served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Ford of Mexico from
January 200
5 to
November 200
8. Prior to this position, she served as Vice President, Global Quality for Ford Motor Company, a position she had held since 1999. Prior to 1999, she served as Vice President for Quality at Whirlpool Corporation, and served in various leadership positions with Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
|
Specific Skills and Attributes
|
Ms. Goeser has extensive experience in senior executive positions and as a director of large public companies, and she possesses the knowledge and expertise necessary to contribute an important viewpoint on a wide variety of governance and operational issues, as well as the reporting and other responsibilities of a public company.
|
Other Directorships
|
During the last five years,
Ms. Goeser
previously served as
a director and a member of the Audit Committee and the Compensation, Governance and Nominating Committee of Tal
en Energy Corporation and as a
director and member of the Compensation, Governance and Nominati
ng Committee of PPL Corporation.
|
Mitchell Jacobson
|
Business Experience
|
Mr. Jacobson was appointed our President and Chief Executive Officer in
October 199
5 and held both positions until
November 200
3. He continued as our Chief Executive Officer until
November 200
5. Mr. Jacobson was appointed our Chairman of the Board in
January 199
8 and became Non-executive Chairman of the Board effective
January
1, 2013. Previously, Mr. Jacobson was President and Chief Executive Officer of Sid Tool Co., Inc., our predecessor company and current wholly-owned and principal operating subsidiary from
June
1982 to
November 200
5.
|
Specific Skills and Attributes
|
Mr. Jacobson has been instrumental to our past and ongoing growth, which reflects the values, strategy and vision that Mr. Jacobson contributes. His leadership as Chairman, experience in industrial distribution and strategic input are critically important to our Board. In addition, as one of our principal shareholders, Mr. Jacobson provides critical insight and perspective relating to the company’s shareholders.
|
Family Relationship
|
Mr. Jacobson is the uncle of Erik Gershwind, our President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the company
, and the brother
of Marjorie Gershwind Fiverson
, Mr. Gershwind’s mother
. There are no other family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
|
Other Directorships
|
Mr. Jacobson was appointed
a
director of Am
brosia Holdings, L.P. in
August 201
7.
Mr. Jacobson previously served as a director of HD Supply Holdings, Inc. from
October 200
7 to
December 201
3.
|
10
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
Michael Kaufmann
|
Business Experience
|
Mr. Kaufmann was recently named as Chief Executive Officer of Cardinal Health, Inc., effective
January
1, 2018. Mr. Kaufmann has served as Chief Financial Officer of Cardinal Health, Inc. since
November 201
4. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer of the Pharmaceutical Segment of Cardinal Health, Inc. from
August 200
9 until
November 201
4. Previously, he was Group President for the Medical distribution businesses of Cardinal Health, Inc. from
April 200
8 until
August 200
9. Mr. Kaufmann served in other executive positions with Cardinal Health from 1990 through 2008, and prior to that he worked for almost six years in public accounting with Arthur Andersen.
|
Specific Skills and Attributes
|
Mr. Kaufmann’s operational expertise and broad experience as a senior executive of a major healthcare services and products company makes him a valued asset to the Board. His knowledge of the distribution business and supply chain management expertise provide the Board with critical insights. In addition, as a chief financial officer of a large public company, Mr. Kaufmann brings additional finance and accounting expertise to our Board
. Mr.
Kaufmann
qualifies
as an “audit committee financial expert”
as defined by
applicable SEC
rules
.
|
|
|
Denis Kelly
|
Business Experience
|
Mr. Kelly is an Investment Banker at Scura Paley Securities LLC, a private investment banking firm which he co-founded in 2001. From 1993 to 2000, he was a Managing Director of Prudential Securities Inc. Previously, he served as the President of Denbrook Capital Corporation, a merchant banking firm, from 1991 to 1993. From 1980 to 1991, Mr. Kelly held various positions at Merrill Lynch, including Managing Director of Mergers and Acquisitions and Managing Director of Merchant Banking. Mr. Kelly began his investment banking career at Lehman Brothers in 1974.
|
Specific Skills and Attributes
|
Mr. Kelly’s varied investment banking career, including extensive mergers and acquisitions experience, along with his service on other public and private boards of directors provide the Board with expertise in finance, business development and corporate governance.
|
Other Directorships
|
Mr. Kelly is also a director of Weight Watchers International, Inc. and Chairman of its Audit Committee. During the last five years, Mr. Kelly previously served as a director and member of the Audit Committee of Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., which is no longer a public company.
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
11
Steven Paladino
|
|
Business Experience
|
Mr. Paladino has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Henry Schein, Inc. since 2000. Prior to his current position, from 1993 to 2000, Mr. Paladino was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, from 1990 to 1992, he served as Vice President and Treasurer and, from 1987 to 1990, he served as Corporate Controller of Henry Schein, Inc. Before joining Henry Schein, Mr. Paladino was employed as a Certified Public Accountant for seven years, most recently with the international accounting firm of BDO Seidman LLP (now known as BDO USA, LLP).
|
Specific Skills and Attributes
|
Mr. Paladino brings to the Board extensive financial, accounting and distribution industry expertise. Mr. Paladino’s skills in corporate finance and accounting provide the Board with expertise and depth in public company accounting issues, and his distribution-related experience provide the Board with critical knowledge and perspectives. Further, his experience as a public company director provides the Board with additional knowledge and perspectives on corporate governance matters.
Mr. Paladino qualifies
as an “audit committee financial expert”
as defined by
applicable SEC
rules
.
|
Other Directorships
|
Mr. Paladino is also a director of Henry Schein, Inc.
|
Philip Peller
|
|
Business Experience
|
Mr. Peller, who has served as our Lead Director since
December 200
7, was a partner of Andersen Worldwide S.C. and Arthur Andersen LLP from 1970 until his retirement in 1999. He served as Managing Partner of Practice Protection and Partner Affairs for Andersen Worldwide S.C. from 1998 to 1999 and as Managing Partner of Practice Protection from 1996 to 1998. He also served as the Managing Director of Quality, Risk Management and Professional Competence for Arthur Andersen’s global audit practice.
|
Specific Skills and Attributes
|
Mr. Peller’s extensive experience in global audit, financial, risk and compliance matters provides invaluable expertise to our Board. In addition, Mr. Peller’s accounting background and experience allow him to provide the Board with unique insight into public company accounting issues and challenges, and also qualify him to serve as an
“audit committee financial expert”
as defined by
applicable SEC
rules
.
|
Other Directorships
|
During the last five years, Mr. Peller previously served as a director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., which is no longer a public company.
|
12
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Director
Quali
fications
The chart below demonstrates how the Board’s nominees for election at our
2018
annual meeting of shareholders provide the skills, experiences and perspectives that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board consider important for an effective board of directors.
Name
|
Industry Knowledge
|
Business Management Experience
|
Financial/Accounting
Experience
|
Business to
Business
Distribution
|
Supply Chain
Management
|
Senior
Executive
Management
|
Public Company
Corporate
Governance
and
Compensation
|
Mergers and
Acquisitions
|
Financial
Literacy
|
Financial
Reporting
|
Jonathan Byrnes
|
✓
|
✓
|
|
|
✓
|
✓
|
|
Roger Fradin
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
Erik Gershwind
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
|
Louise Goeser
|
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
|
Mitchell Jacobson
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
Michael Kaufmann
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
Denis Kelly
|
|
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
Steven Paladino
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
Philip Peller
|
|
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
✓
|
|
The Board recommends a vote “FOR”
the re-election of each of
Ms. Goeser and Messrs. Byrnes, Fradin, Gershwind, Jacobson, Kaufmann, Kelly,
Paladino and
Peller.
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
13
COR
PORATE GOVERNANCE
Dir
ector Independence
Pursuant to New York Stock Exchange listing standards, a majority of the members of our Board must be independent. The Board must determine that each independent director has no material relationship with the company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company). The Board follows the criteria set forth in Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange listing standards to determine director independence. Our independence criteria are also set forth in Section 1.1 of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a copy of which is available on our website at
www.mscdirect.com/corporategovernance
.
In addition to applying these guidelines, the Board will consider all relevant facts and circumstances in making an independence determination.
The Board undertakes a review of director independence on an annual basis and as events arise which may affect director independence. Based upon this review, the Board determined that Ms. Goeser and Messrs. Byrnes, Fradin, Kaufmann, Kelly, Paladino and Peller are independent in accordance with Section 303A.02 of the New York Stock Exchange listing standards and Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to as the Exchange Act, as well as under our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
In evaluating the independence of Ms. Goeser, the Board considered that Ms. Goeser is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Siemens S.A. de C.V., an affiliate of Siemens AG, and is responsible for Siemens Mesoamérica. Siemens AG is a customer and supplier of our company. Sales to and purchases from Siemens AG were made in the ordinary course of business and amounted to significantly less than 0.5% of the recipient company’s gross revenues during its most recent fiscal year.
In evaluating the independence of Mr. Byrnes, the Board considered that Mr. Byrnes is a Senior Lecturer at MIT, which is a customer of our company. Sales to MIT were made in the ordinary course of business and amounted to significantly less than 0.5% of the company’s gross revenues during our most recent fiscal year.
In evaluating the independence of Mr. Fradin, the Board considered that Mr. Fradin served as Vice Chairman of Honeywell International Inc., which is a customer and supplier of our company, from
April 201
4 until
February 201
7. In addition, the Board considered that Mr. Fradin is (i) a director of Signode Industrial Group, which is a supplier of our company, (ii) a director of Pitney Bowes, which is a supplier of our company, and (iii) a director of Harris Corporation, which is a customer of our company. Sales to and purchases from such companies were made in the ordinary course of business and amounted to significantly less than 0.5% of the recipient company’s gross revenues during its most recent fiscal year.
In evaluating the independence of Mr. Paladino, the Board considered that Mr. Paladino is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Henry Schein, Inc., which is a customer of our company. Sales to Henry Schein were made in the ordinary course of business and amounted to significantly less than 0.5% of the company’s gross revenues during our most recent fiscal year.
14
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Board Me
etings and Attendance
The standing committees of our Board are the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The table below provides the current membership
of our Board and
each of these committees and the number of meetings held by
our
Board and each
of these
committee
s
during fiscal year 2017
.
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Board
|
Audit
Committee
|
Compensation
Committee
|
Nominating
and Corporate
Governance
Committee
|
Jonathan Byrnes
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Fradin
|
|
|
|
|
Erik Gershwind
|
|
|
|
|
Louise Goeser
|
|
|
|
|
Mitchell Jacobson
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Kaufmann
|
|
|
|
|
Denis Kelly
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Paladino
|
|
|
|
|
Philip Peller
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year 2017
Meetings
|
8
|
6
|
7
|
4
|
Lead Director
Chairperson
Audit Committee Financial Expert
Member
During fiscal year 2017
, each of our current directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of our Board and of the committees of our Board on which he or she served.
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
15
Boa
rd Committees
Audit Committee
Principal Functions
|
|
|
Principal Functions of the Audit Committee
|
|
Assists in Board oversight of:
|
|
the preparation and integrity of our financial statements;
|
|
our compliance with our ethics policies and legal and regulatory requirements;
|
|
our independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and independence; and
|
|
the performance of our internal audit function.
|
|
Appoints (and is responsible for terminating) our independent registered public accounting firm.
|
|
Recommends to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC.
|
|
Oversees risk management practices for our major financial risk exposures and the steps that have been taken to monitor and mitigate such exposures.
|
|
Prepares an annual Audit Committee report to be included in our annual proxy statement.
|
|
Undertakes an annual evaluation of its performance.
|
Composition and Charter
The Audit Committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Byrnes, Kaufmann, Kelly, Paladino and Peller, each of whom the Board has determined to be independent under both the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and to meet the financial literacy requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. Mr. Peller is the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Peller, Kaufmann and Paladino qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules of the SEC.
The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, termination, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent auditors. The Audit Committee has adopted a written charter, a copy of which is available on our website at
www.mscdirect.com/corporategovernance
. The Audit Committee has the authority to engage independent counsel and other advisors as it deems necessary to carry out its duties. We are obligated to provide appropriate funding for the Audit Committee for these purposes.
Policy on Service on Other Audit Committees
Under our corporate governance guidelines, members of the Audit Committee may not serve as members of an audit committee for more than three public companies, including the Audit Committee of our Board.
16
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Compensation Committee
Principal Functions
|
|
|
Principal Functions of the Compensation Committee
|
|
Reviews
and approves
corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
Evaluates our Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of those goals and objectives.
|
|
Determines and approves our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation level based on its evaluation of his performance.
|
|
Sets the compensation levels of all of our other executive officers, including with respect to our incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans.
|
|
Recommends to our Board the compensation of our non-executive directors.
|
|
Has the sole responsibility to retain and terminate the compensation consultant.
|
|
Administers our equity incentive plans.
|
|
Oversees risk management practices for risks relating to our overall compensation structure, including review of our compensation practices, in each case with a view to assessing associated risks.
|
|
Prepares a Compensation Committee report on executive compensation to be included in our annual proxy statement.
|
|
Undertakes an annual evaluation of its performance.
|
Composition and Charter
Our Compensation Committee is currently comprised of Ms. Goeser and Messrs. Fradin, Kaufmann, Kelly and Paladino, each of whom is an independent director. Mr. Kelly is the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has adopted a written charter, a copy of which is available on our website at
www.mscdirect.com/corporategovernance
.
Delegation of Authority
The Compensation Committee does not delegate its responsibilities to any other directors or members of management. Under our 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee is permitted to delegate its authority under such plan to a committee of one or more directors or one or more officers, in all cases to the extent permitted under applicable law, including New York Stock Exchange listing requirements. However, as a matter of policy, the Compensation Committee authorizes all grants of awards under the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Compensation Processes and Procedures
The Compensation Committee makes all compensation decisions for our executive officers. In fiscal year
2017
, the views and recommendations of Mitchell Jacob
son, our Chairman of the Board,
and Erik Gershwind, our President and Chief Executive Officer, were considered by the members of the Compensation Committee in its review of the performance and compensation of individual executives. The views and recommendations of Mr. Jacobson and Mr. Gershwind will continue to be considered by the members of the Compensation Committee in its review of the performance and compensation of individual executives. In fiscal year
2017
, Mr. Jacobson also provided input on Mr. Gershwind’s compensation. In addition, the Compensation Committee obtains input from Mr. Gershwind on the compensation of the other named executive officers and other executive officers and senior officers. Our Human Resources department and our Senior Vice President and Chief People O
fficer, Ms. Kari Heerdt, assist
the Chairman of the Compensation Committee in developing the agenda for committee meetings and work with the Compensation Committee in developing agenda materials for
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
17
the committee’s review, including coordinating and presenting management’s proposals and recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to executive and non-executive director compensation. Ms. Heerdt and Mr. Gershwind regularly attend Compensation Committee meetings, excluding portions of meetings where their own compensation is discussed. The Compensation Committee considers, but is not bound by, management’s proposals and recommendations with respect to executive compensation.
The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain and terminate any third-party compensation consultant and to obtain advice and assistance from internal and external legal, accounting and other advisors. In connection with compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee for fiscal
year 2017
, the Committee relied on competitive market data and analysis prepared by its independent compensation consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., a compensation consulting firm that we refer to in this proxy statement as F.W. Cook. F.W. Cook provides research, market data and survey information and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding our executive compensation programs and our non-executive director compensation programs. F.W. Cook advises the Compensation Committee on the competitiveness of our compensation arrangements and provides input, analysis and recommendations for the compensation paid to our named executive officers, other executives and non-management directors. F.W. Cook provides data and analysis with respect to public companies having similar characteristics (including size, profitability, geography, business lines and growth rates) to those of our company. As discussed under “
Compensation Risk Assessment
” below, F.W. Cook also updated and confirmed the
comprehensive risk assessment of our incen
tive-based compensation plans which F.W. Cook conducted in 2016
(and prepares on a triennial basis)
to assist the Compensation Committee in its compensation risk assessment. The Compensation Committee considers, but is not bound by, the consultant’s recommendations with respect to executive and non-e
xecutive director compensation.
During fiscal year
2017
, the Compensation Committee reviewed the independence of F.W. Cook, its other advisors and the individuals employed by such advisors who furnish services to us, which included a consideration of the factors required by New York Stock Exchange listing standards. Based on its review, the Compensation Committee determined that F.W. Cook, its other advisors and the individuals employed by such advisors who furnish services to us are independent and that their service does not raise any conflicts of interest that would prevent them from providing independent and objective advice to the committee.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During our
2017
fiscal year, each of Ms. Goeser and Messrs. Fradin, Kaufmann, Kelly and Paladino served as members of our Compensation Committee. None of the members of the Compensation Committee was, during or prior to fiscal year
2017
, an officer of the company or any of our subsidiaries or had any relationship with us other than serving as a director and as a de minimis shareholder. In addition, none of our directors has interlocking or other relationships with other boards, compensation committees or our executive officers that would require disclosure under Item 407(e)(4) of Regulation S-K.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Principal Functions
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
|
|
Identifies individuals qualified to become members of our Board consistent with criteria approved by our Board.
|
|
Reviews the qualifications and independence of the nominees for director.
|
|
Recommends to our Board nominees for membership on our Board. Only those candidates recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will be considered by our Board as nominees for director.
|
|
Develops and recommends to our Board corporate governance principles and other corporate governance policies that are applicable to our company.
|
18
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
|
Reviews and approves any related party transactions between the company and any officer, director, principal shareholder or immediate family member or other affiliate of such persons proposed to be entered into and, if appropriate, ratifies any such transaction previously commenced and ongoing.
|
|
Oversees the evaluation of our Board, Board Committees and our management.
|
|
Oversees risk management practices for risks relating to governance and compliance matters.
|
|
Assists in Board oversight of our compliance with our ethics policies.
|
|
Undertakes an annual evaluation of its performance.
|
Composition and Charter
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is currently comprised of Ms. Goeser and Messrs. Byrnes, Fradin and Peller, each of whom is an independent director. Ms. Goeser is the Chairwoman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a written charter, a copy of which is available on our website at
www.mscdirect.com/corporategovernance
.
Policy Regarding Shareholder Nominations for Director
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board believes that the best director candidates will be those who have a number of qualifications, including independence, knowledge, judgment, integrity, character, leadership skills, education, experience, financial literacy, standing in the community and an ability to foster a diversity of backgrounds and views and to complement our Board’s existing strengths. There are no specific, minimum or absolute criteria for Board membership. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to achieve a balance and diversity of knowledge, experience and capability on our Board, while maintaining a sense of collegiality and cooperation that is conducive to a productive working relationship within the Board and between the Board and management. The Nominati
ng and Corporate Governance Committee also believes that it is important for directors to have demonstrated an ethical and successful career. Such a career may include:
|
·
|
|
experience as a senior executive of a publicly traded corporation, a management consultant, an investment banker, a
partner
at a law firm or registered public accounting firm or a professor at an accredited law or business school;
|
|
·
|
|
experience
in the management or leadership of a substantial private business enterprise, educational, religious or not-for-profit organization; or
|
|
·
|
|
such
other
professional experience as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines qualifies an individual for Board service.
|
At all times, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will make every effort to ensure that our Board and its committees include at least the required number of independent directors, as that term is defined by applicable standards promulgated by the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC. In addition, prior to nominating an existing director for re-election to our Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider and review such existing director’s attendance and pe
rformance, independence, experience, skills and contributions as an existing director to our Board.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may employ third-party search firms to identify director candidates, if so desired. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will review and consider recommendations from a wide variety of contacts, including current executive officers, directors, community leaders and shareholders, as a source for potential director candidates.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider qualified director candidates recommended by shareholders in compliance with our procedures and subject to applicable inquiries. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have different standards for
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
19
evaluating nominees depending on whether they are proposed by our directors or by our shareholders. Any shareholder may recommend a nominee for director at least 120 calendar days prior to the one year anniversary of the date on which our proxy statement was released to shareholders in connection
with the previous year’s annual meeting, by writing to Corporate Secretary, MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc., 75 Maxess Road, Melville, NY 11747, and providing the following information:
|
·
|
|
the name, company shareholdings and contact information of the person making the nomination;
|
|
·
|
|
the candidate’s name, address and other contact information;
|
|
·
|
|
any direct or indirect holdings of our securities by the nominee;
|
|
·
|
|
any information required to be disclosed about directors under applicable securities laws and/or stock exchange requirements;
|
|
·
|
|
information regarding related party transactions with the company and/or the shareholder submitting the nomination;
|
|
·
|
|
any actual or potential conflicts of interest; and
|
|
·
|
|
the nominee’s biographical data, current public and private company affiliations, employment history and qualifications and status as “independent” under applicable securities laws and stock exchange requirements.
|
All of these communications will be reviewed by our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary and forwarded to Ms. Goeser, the Chairwoman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, for further review and consideration in accordance with this policy. Any such shareholder recommendation should be accompanied by a written statement from the candidate of his or her consent to be named as a candidate and, if nominated and elected, to serve as a director.
Board Leade
rship Structure
; Executive Sessions of the Independent Directors
Our Board functions collaboratively and emphasizes active participation and leadership by all of its members.
Our Board currently consists of nine directors, each of whom, other than Messrs. Gershwind and Jacobson, is independent under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange. Mr. Gershwind has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since
January
1, 2013 and as a member of our Board since 2010. Mr. Jacobson, who is one of our principal shareholders, has served as our Non-executive Chairman since
January
1, 2013 and as our Chairman since 1998. Mr. Jacobson previously served as our President from
October 199
5 through
November 200
3, and as our Chief Executive Officer from
October 199
5 through
November 200
5. The Board has separated the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since 2005 and has appointed a non-management, lead director since 2007.
Our Board of Directors believes that the most effective Board leadership structure for our company at the present time is for the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board to be separated. Under this structure, our Chief Executive Officer is generally responsible for setting the strategic direction for our company and for providing the day-to-day leadership over our operations, and our Chairman of the Board sets the agenda for meetings of the Board and presides over Board meetings. In addition, our independent directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without me
mbers of management present. Mr. Peller, who has served as our Lead Director since 2007, serves as the presiding director at the executive sessions of the independent directors. The Lead Director also has such other duties and responsibilities as determined by the Board from time to time. Those additional duties and responsibilities include:
|
·
|
|
making
recommendations to the Board regarding the structure of Board meetings;
|
|
·
|
|
recommending
matters for consideration by the Board;
|
|
·
|
|
determining
appropriate materials to be provided to the directors;
|
20
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
|
·
|
|
serving
as an independent point of contact for shareholders wishing to communicate with the Board;
|
|
·
|
|
assigning tasks to the appropriate Board committees with the approval of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance
Committee; and
|
|
·
|
|
acting as a liaison between management and the independent directors.
|
Our Board retains the authority to modify this leadership structure as and when appropriate to best address our unique circumstances at any given time and to serve the best interests of our shareholders.
Role of the Boa
rd in Risk Oversight
Our Board’s role in risk oversight involves both the full Board and its committees. The full Board is responsible for the oversight of risk management and reviews our major financial, operational, compliance, reputational and strategic risks, including steps to monitor, manage and mitigate such risks. In addition, each of the Board committees is responsible for oversight of risk management practices for categories of risks relevant to their functions. For example, the Audit Committee discusses with management our major financial risk exposures and the steps that have been taken to monitor and mitigate such exposures, including with respect to risk assessment and risk management. Similarly, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has oversight responsibility over governance and compliance matters and the Compensation Committee has oversight responsibility for our overall compensation structure, including review of its compensation practices, in each case with a view to assessing associated risks. Please see “
Compensation Risk Assessment
” on page
47
of this proxy statement.
The Board as a group is regularly updated on specific risks in the course of its review of corporate strategy, business plans and reports to the Board by management and its respective committees. The Board believes that its leadership structure supports its risk oversight function by providing a greater role for the independent directors in the oversight of our company.
Corporate Gover
nance Guidelines
We have adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website at
www.mscdirect.com/corporategovernance
.
Director A
ttendance at Shareholder Meetings
We encourage attendance by the directors at our annual meeting of shareholders. All of our current directors attended the annual meeting held on
January 26, 2017
, either in person or by telephone.
Non-Execut
ive Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
To more closely align the interests of our non-executive directors with those of our shareholders, our Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, adopted stock ownership guidelines for all of our non-executive directors
in
2011. The ownership guidelines provide for each of our non-executive directors to own a minimum number of shares having a value equal to five times his or her base annual
cash
retainer (
i.e., a value equal to
$210,000 for directors whose tenure began before the adoption of the guidelines and
a value equal to
$250,000 for Messrs. Kaufmann and Paladino). All shares held by our non-executive directors, including unvested restricted stock units
,
count toward this guideline. The guidelines provide for our non-executive directors to reach this ownership level within the later of five years from the date on which the guidelines were adopted or five years from the date on which the director is first appointed or elected. Once a non-executive director has attained his or her minimum ownership requirement, he or she must maintain at least that level of ownership. If a non-executive director has not satisfied his or her proportionate minimum stock ownership guideline, the director must retain an amount equal to 100% of the net shares received as a result of the exercise of stock options or the vesting of restricted stock units. All of our non-executive directors are in compliance with their current stock ownership guidelines.
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
21
Code of Eth
ics and Code of Business Conduct
We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and senior financial officers and a Code of Business Conduct that applies to all of our directors, officers and associates. The Code of Ethics and the Code of Business Conduct are available on our website at
www.mscdirect.com/corporategovernance
. We intend to disclose on our website, in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Ethics and our Code of Business Conduct.
Shareh
older Communications Policy
Any shareholder or other interested party who desires to communicate with our Chairman of the Board, Lead Director or non-management members of our Board may do so by writing to: Board, c/o Philip Peller, Lead Director of the Board, MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc., 75 Maxess Road, Melville, NY 11747. Communications may be addressed to the Chairman of the Board, the Lead Director, an individual director, a Board committee, the non-management directors or the full Board
.
Sectio
n 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors and persons who own beneficially more than 10% of our Class A common stock to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms furnished to us and written representations from our executive officers, directors and such beneficial owners, we
believe that all filing requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act were timely complied with during the fiscal year ended
September 2
, 2017,
except that (i) Mr. Gershwind filed one late Form 4 to report the vesting of RSUs and a late Form 5 for fiscal year 2017 reporting two gifts, and (ii) Mr. Jacobson filed one late Form 4 to report a conversion of Class B shares and two gifts.
22
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
EX
ECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following individuals are our executive officers as of the date of this proxy statement:
|
|
|
|
Name of Officer
|
Position
|
Age
|
Executive Officer Since
|
Erik Gershwind
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
4
6
|
December 200
5
|
Rustom Jilla
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
5
6
|
July 201
5
|
Douglas Jones
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer
|
5
3
|
December 200
5
|
Steve Armstrong
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
5
9
|
October 200
8
|
Kari Heerdt
|
Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer
|
50
|
August 201
4
|
Steven Baruch
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy and Marketing Officer
|
4
9
|
March 201
6
|
Charles Bonomo
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer
|
5
2
|
July 200
7
|
Christopher Davanzo
|
Senior Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller
|
5
4
|
October 201
0
|
Gregory Polli
|
Senior Vice President, Product Management
|
5
4
|
March 201
6
|
David Wright
|
Senior Vice President, Sales
|
49
|
March 201
6
|
Please refer to the section entitled “
Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1)
”
beginning
on
page
7
of this proxy statement for the biographical data for Mr. Gershwind.
Rustom Jilla
Mr. Jilla was appointed our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in
July 201
5. From
April 201
3 through
September 201
4, Mr. Jilla served as Chief Financial Officer of Dematic Group, a global provider of warehouse logistics and inventory management solutions. From
September 200
2 to
April 201
3, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Ansell Limited, a global leader in protective solutions, publicly traded on the Australian Securities Exchange. Prior to that, Mr. Jilla served as Vice President, Financial Operations at PerkinElmer Inc., and earlier spent 12 years at The BOC Group, a U.K.-listed, multinational industrial gas company, where he held various Product Management and Finance leadership roles. He began his career in auditing with Coopers & Lybrand (now PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP).
Douglas Jones
Mr. Jones was appointed our Executive Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer in
October 201
4, having previously served as our Executive Vice President, Global Supply Chain Operations since
October 200
9. Previously, he was our Senior Vice President, Supply Chain Management from
April 200
8 until
October 200
9 and our Senior Vice President of Logistics from
December 200
5 until
April 200
8. Mr. Jones joined our company in
July 200
1, as Vice President of Fulfillment. Prior to joining our company, he served as Vice President, Distribution Operations for the Central Region of the United States, at Fisher Scientific from 1998 to 2001. Prior to his role at Fisher Scientific, Mr. Jones was part of the management team at McMaster-Carr Supply Company, based in Chicago. During his tenure with McMaster-Carr, Mr. Jones held various managerial positions of increasing responsibility in fulfillment, finance, purchasing and inventory management.
Steve Armstrong
Mr. Armstrong
was appointed our
Senior
Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in
October 201
2. Previously, he served as our Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from
October 200
8 until
October 201
2. From 2006 to 2008, he was a legal consultant based in New York, New York performing services for Thomson Reuters and NBC Universal. Mr. Armstrong was the Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Home Shopping Network in Tampa, Florida from 2002 to 2006. From 2000 to 2002, he was the Senior Vice President and General Counsel
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
23
of Agilera, Inc., a technology company in Denver, Colorado. Prior to 2000, Mr. Armstrong was the Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary of Samsonite Corporation and a partner in the law firms Paul Hastings, and Baker and Hostetler.
Kari Heerdt
Ms. Heerdt was appointed our Chief People Officer in
August 201
4. Previously, Ms. Heerdt served as Partner, Strategic Account Executive at Aon Hewitt, the global talent, retirement and health business of Aon Plc (NYSE: AON), where she oversaw one of Aon Hewitt’s largest clients. Prior to that, Ms. Heerdt was a Senior Consultant at Hewitt in the Corporate Restructuring and Change, Talent and Organization Consulting practice, later becoming the Senior Manager, Operations for Cerberus Capital Management, a leading investment management firm, before becoming the Senior Vice President, Human Resources for two of Cerberus’ portfolio companies, Mervyn’s LLC and Talecris Biotheraputics, Inc. Ms. Heerdt served as Senior Vice President, Human Resources for Mervyn’s LLC from
April 200
5 until
January 200
8. In
July 200
8, Mervyn’s LLC filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and, later in 2008, was liquidated.
Steven Baruch
Mr. Baruch was appointed our Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy and Marketing Officer in
August 201
7. Previously, he served as our Senior Vice President, Strategy and Marketing, a position he held from
July 201
5 until
August 201
7.
Prior to that, he served as our Vice President of Digital & Strategy, a position he held from 2014 until
July 201
5, and as our Vice President of eCommerce from
November 201
0 until
May 201
4. Mr. Baruch began his career with our company in
May 200
8. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Baruch served as Senior Vice President of Sales and Managed Services for Adecco where he was responsible for leading B2B sales and marketing with focus on digital, web and eCommerce strategy and execution.
Previously, he held various executive positions at global electronics distributor Arrow Electronics, including Director of Sales, Marketing, and Public Relations for arrow.com.
Charles Bonomo
Mr. Bonomo was appointed our Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer in
August 201
1. Previously, he served as our Vice President and Chief Information Officer from
July 200
7 through
August 201
1. From 1999 through 2007 he served as Vice President at Arrow Electronics, Inc., including in the position of Vice President of Infrastructure and Operations from
January 200
6 to
July 200
7, and as Vice President and Chief Architect from
July 200
3 through
January 200
6. Previously, he was the Director of Clinical Technology at Mount Sinai Medical Center from 1996 to 1998, rising to Vice President and Chief Information Officer of NYU Health System in 1998. Prior to 1996, he held various positions of increasing responsibility at J.P. Morgan in the United States and Europe and at Grumman Aerospace Corp., where he designed and tested software for the F14 Tomcat aircraft.
Christopher Davanzo
Mr. Davanzo was appointed our Senior Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller in
July 201
5. Previously, he served as our Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller, a position he held from 2006 until
July 201
5. From 1993 through 2006, he held various positions of increasing responsibility in the finance department at Olympus America Inc., including the role of Vice President of Finance from 2004 to 2006. Prior to joining Olympus, Mr. Davanzo held several auditing and accounting positions, including with KPMG LLP, Coopers & Lybrand (now PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP), and Weight Watchers International.
Gregory Polli
Mr. Polli was appointed our Senior Vice President, Product Management in
July 201
5. Previously, he served as our Vice President, Product Management from
November 200
5 to
July 201
5, our Vice President, Metalworking from
November 200
2 to
November 200
5, our Vice President, Metalworking Merchandising from
April 200
2 to
November 200
2 and our Vice President, Product from
October 199
9 to
April 200
2. Prior to that, Mr. Polli held various positions of increasing responsibility at our company in product management and merchandising since joining our company in 1988.
24
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
David Wright
Mr. Wright was appointed our Senior Vice President, Sales in
July 201
5.
Previously, Mr. Wright served as our Vice President, Field Sales f
rom
February 200
8
to
July 201
5
,
our Vice President, North Region
from
May 200
6 to
February 200
8 and
our National Director of Sales
from
August 200
1 to
May 200
6
.
Prior to that, Mr.
Wright
held various positions of increasing responsibility at
our
company in
sales since joining our company
in
1998.
There are no arrangements or understandings between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which the executive officer was, or is to be, selected as an officer of our company.
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
25
RATIFIC
ATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (PROPOSAL NO. 2)
Our Audit Committee has appointed the firm of Ernst & Young LLP, which has been our independent registered public accounting firm since 2002, to serve as our independent registered public accounting
firm for fiscal year
2018
. Although shareholder ratification of the Audit Committee’s action in this respect is not required, our Board considers it desirable for shareholders to pass upon the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm. If the shareholders disapprove of the selection, our Audit Committee intends to reconsider the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.
Ernst & Young LLP has advised us that neither it nor any of its members has any direct or material indirect financial interest in our company. We expect that a representative from Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the annual meeting. This representative will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Princ
ipal Accountant Fees and Services
For the fiscal years ended
September
2
, 201
7
and
September
3, 2016
, Ernst & Young LLP billed us for their services the fees set forth in the table below. All audit and permissible non-audit services reflected in the fees below were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with established procedures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Audit fees
(1)
|
$
|
1,695,000
|
$
|
1,331,546
|
Audit-related fees
(2)
|
$
|
142,000
|
$
|
41,000
|
Tax fees
(3)
|
$
|
47,000
|
$
|
86,649
|
All
o
ther
f
ees
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
Total
|
$
|
1,884,000
|
$
|
1,459,195
|
_____________________________
|
(1)
|
|
Reflects audit fees for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements, audit of management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and related opinions, review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, services that were provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and advice on compliance with financial accounting and reporting standards.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Reflects
audit-related fees for assurance and related services by Ernst & Young LLP that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements. The nature of the services performed for these fees was the audit of our 401(k) plan in fiscal years 2017 and 2016 and due diligence services provided in connection with acquisitions in fiscal year 2017.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Reflects tax fees for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. The nature of the services performed for these fees was for assistance in United Kingdom and United States federal and state tax compliance and state and local tax
consultation
and tax advice provided in connection with our equity compensation plans.
|
26
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Audit Com
mittee Pre-Approval Policy
The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm and is not permitted to engage the independent registered public accounting firm to perform any non-audit services proscribed by law or regulation. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee, in which case decisions taken are to be presented to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting.
The Audit Committee of the Board has considered whether, and has determined that, the provision of non-audit services by Ernst & Young LLP is compatible with maintaining auditor independence.
|
The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year
2018
.
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
27
AU
DIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The information contained under this “Audit Committee Report” shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which we refer to as the Securities Act, or under the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference into any such filing.
The Audit Committee oversees the company’s financial accounting and reporting processes and systems of internal controls on behalf of our Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, termination, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent auditors. The Audit Committee consists of the five directors named below, each of whom is an independent director as defined by applicable SEC rules and NYSE listing standards.
Each year the Audit Committee evaluates the qualifications, performance and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm and determines whether to reengage the current firm. In doing so the Audit Committee considers the quality and efficiency of the services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, its capabilities, its technical expertise
,
its knowledge of our operations
and the appropriateness of its fees for audit and non-audit services
. Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm to examine our consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting for fiscal
year
2017. In addition, the Audit Committee is directly involved in selecting the lead audit engagement partner whenever a rotational change is required, normally every five years. Our company’s lead audit engagement partner was most recently changed for the fiscal
year 2017
audit.
Our financial and senior management supervise our systems of internal controls and the financial reporting process. Our independent registered public accounting firm performs an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and expresses an opinion on these consolidated financial statements. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm expresses its own opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee monitors these processes.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with both the management of the company and our independent registered public accounting firm our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended
September
2, 2017
, as well as management’s assessment and our independent registered public accounting firm’s evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. Our management represented to the Audit Committee that our audited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Audit Committee discussed with our internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee met with the
company’s Director of Internal Audit
and the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their audits, their evaluations of our internal controls, including internal control over financial reporting, and the overall quality of our financial reporting.
28
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
The Audit Committee also discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by our independent registered public accounting firm with the Audit Committee under the rules adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from our independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the independence of that firm. The Audit Committee has also considered whether the provision of non-audit services by our independent registered public accounting firm is compatible with maintaining the independence of the auditors. The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. All audit and permissible non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm during fiscal year
2017
and fiscal year
2016
were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with established procedures.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board (and our Board approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September
2, 2017, which was filed with the SEC on
October
31, 2017.
Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board,
Philip Peller (Chairman)
Jonathan Byrnes
Michael Kaufmann
Denis Kelly
Steven Paladino
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
29
COM
PENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
In this section, we discuss the material elements of our compensation programs and policies, including the objectives of our compensation programs and the reasons why we pay each element of our executives’ compensation. Following this discussion, you will find a series of tables containing more specific details about the compensation earned by or awarded to the following individuals, whom we refer to as the named executive officers or NEOs. This discussion focuses principally on compensation and compensation practices relating to the named executive officers for our 201
7
fiscal year.
|
|
Name
|
Position
|
Erik Gershwind
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Rustom Jilla
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Douglas Jones
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer
|
Steve Armstrong
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
Kari Heerdt
|
Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer
|
Executi
ve Summary
Fiscal 2017 Performance Highlights
In fiscal year
2017
, we generated results reflecting
strong
execution
as market conditions improved and the overall manufacturing sector returned to growth. However, the pricing environment continued to remain a headwind for our business. Based on these dynamics,
our performance in fiscal
2017
was highlighted by the following developments:
|
·
|
|
we continued our market share gains, building on our leadership position
in metalworking, as well as
developing
a leadership position in
our Class C inventory business;
|
|
·
|
|
we
continued
to stabilize our
gross margin in the face of a
continuing
soft pricing environment;
|
|
·
|
|
earnings
per share increased to $4.05 from $3.77 in fiscal 2016, as we realized the benefits from our strong expense controls and cost structure and the leverage in our business model;
|
|
·
|
|
we
continued
to build stronger partnerships with our customers,
providing
deep technical expertise across the industries that we serve, and optimiz
ing
our customers’ operations with inventory management and other supply chain solutions;
and
|
|
·
|
|
we
completed the acquisition of DECO Tool Supply Co. (“DECO”) in
July 201
7.
|
Net sales
in
creased
0
.
8
% to $2.8
9
billion
in fiscal
2017
from $2.
86
billion
in fiscal
2016
.
Fiscal
2017
was a 5
2
-week year as compared with fiscal
2016
which was a 5
3
-week year.
Average daily sales (ADS) increased 3.2% in fiscal 2017, as compared to fiscal 2016.
Even as we continued to invest in our future growth, operating expenses both in dollars and as a percentage of sales were lower than the prior year.
Operating income in fiscal
2017
was $37
9
.0
million
, representing a
n
in
crease of 0.
8
% from operating income of $37
6
.
0
million
in fiscal
2016
. For fiscal
2017
, the company achieved diluted earnings
per share of $4.05 versus $3.77
in fiscal
2016
.
Fiscal 2017 Compensation Highlights
Consistent with our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy, the Compensation Committee of our Board (referred to in this discussion as the Committee) took the following key actions with respect to NEO compensation for fiscal 2017:
|
·
|
|
Bonus Payouts Approximated Target
. B
ased on
company performance against target performance goals and
achievement levels of each NEO’s individual goals and objectives (G&Os) under our performance bonus plan,
and
the Committee’s determination of the appropriate individual performance multiplier, payouts under our performance bonus plan
were 114.9% of target for Mr. Gershwind and 91.5
% of target
for our other NEOs.
|
30
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
|
·
|
|
Total Cash Compensation Generally
At or Below Market Median
. Total actual cash compensation
for Mr. Gershwind approximated the 75
th
percentile of the competitive market data developed by our independent compensation consultant. Messrs. Jilla’s and Jones’ total cash compensation approximated the 50
th
percentile of the competitive market data, and Ms. Heerdt’s and Mr. Armstrong’s total cash compensation approximated
the 25th percentile of the
competitive
market data.
|
|
·
|
|
CEO Total Direct Compensation
(“TDC”)
Below Market 25th Percentile; Other NEOs Generally
At or
Below Market Median
. We calculate
TDC
as the sum of fiscal year end base salary, actual annual
performance
bonuses and long-term equity awards (and in the cases of Mr. Jilla and Ms. Heerdt, we also annualize
their special new hire grants of restricted shares made in fiscal 2015
over their five-year vesting periods, which is consistent with the market data methodology). For fiscal
2017
, Mr. Gershwind’s
TDC
was
4.5
% below the 25th percentile of the competitive market data; Mr. Jilla’s
TDC
approximated the
50
th
percentile; Mr. Jones’
TDC
was between the median and 75
th
percentile; Mr. Armstrong’s
TDC
approximated the 25
th
percentile; and Ms. Heerdt’s
TDC
was between the 25
th
and 50
th
percentiles of the competitive market data.
|
The table below illustrates how our
compensation
is aligned with our performance by showing the total cash compensation and total direct compensation for each of our NEOs in fiscal
2017
and the competitive positioning of our NEOs’ total cash compensation and total direct compensation against
the
competitive market data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named
Executive Officer
|
Fiscal 2017
Total Cash
Compensation
|
Competitive
Positioning
(2)
of Total Cash
Compensation
|
Fiscal 2017
Total Direct
Compensation
|
Competitive
Positioning
(2)
of Total Direct
Compensation
|
($)
(1)
|
($)
(3)
|
Erik Gershwind
|
2,450,064
|
approx. 75
th
percentile
|
3,950,069
|
<25
th
percentile
|
Rustom Jilla
|
826,581
|
approx. 50
th
percentile
|
1,732,593
|
approx. 50
th
percentile
|
Douglas Jones
|
601,355
|
approx. 50
th
percentile
|
1,217,377
|
between 50
th
&
75
th
percentiles
|
Steve Armstrong
|
561,071
|
approx. 25
th
percentile
|
1,001,600
|
approx. 25
th
percentile
|
Kari Heerdt
|
502,480
|
approx. 25
th
percentile
|
923,980
|
between 25
th
&
50
th
percentiles
|
____________________________
|
(1)
|
|
Total cash compensation is calculated as the sum of (i) base salary in effect as of the fiscal year end and (ii) actual annual performance bonus.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Please see “
―Competitive Positioning
” beginning on page
43
for information about our peer companies and our competitive market data.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Total direct compensation is calculated as the sum of (i) base salary (see Note 1 above), (ii) actual annual performance bonus (see Note 1 above) and (iii) long-term equity awards granted in fiscal 2017 (and, in the cases of Mr. Jilla and Ms. Heerdt, also includes 20% of the grant date value of their special new hire grants
of restricted shares made
in fiscal
2015
).
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
31
Comp
ensation Philosophy and Objectives
We believe that the quality, skills and dedication of our executive officers are critical factors affecting the company’s performance and, therefore,
long-term
shareholder value. Our key compensation goals
for our associates, including the NEOs,
are to:
|
·
|
|
create a performance driven culture based on personal accountability by linking rewards to company and
individual
performance;
|
|
·
|
|
provide a market competitive compensation opportunity to enable the company to attract, retain and motivate
highly
talented associates; and
|
|
·
|
|
align
our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders.
|
Accordingly, in determining the amount and mix of compensation, the Committee seeks to provide a market competitive compensation package, structure annual and long-term incentive programs that reward achievement of performance goals that directly correlate to the enhancement of sustained, long-term shareholder value, and promote executive retention.
The following table provides information about the key elements of our 2017 compensation programs:
|
|
|
|
Compensation Element
|
Description
|
|
Key Objectives
|
Base Salary
|
Fixed Annual Cash
|
|
Attract and retain highly talented executives
|
|
Targeted at or below the median of our competitive market data
|
|
Competitive positioning may vary based upon executive’s experience and individual performance
|
Annual Performance Bonus
|
Variable Annual Cash
|
|
Pay for performance program that rewards achievement of company financial metrics tied to organic revenue growth and operating margin, and individual goals and objectives (G&Os)
|
|
“At risk” since
there is no payout for any measure where the company or the individual fails to achieve the threshold level for such measure
|
|
Maximum payout of 200% of target realized only if company and executive achieve superior performance for all company financial and individual
measures
|
|
Committee retains discretion to reduce annual bonus payouts
|
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
|
Variable Equity (stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs))
|
|
Aligns our executives’ interests with our shareholders
|
|
Promotes retention
|
|
RSUs
vest 20% on each of the 1
st
through 5
th
anniversaries
of grant
|
|
Stock options vest 25% on each of the 1
s
t
through 4
th
anniversaries of grant
|
Welfare Benefits and Perquisites
|
Generally tracks broad-based benefits
|
|
No supplemental life insurance, financial planning, country club memberships or special health benefits
|
32
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
Compensation Element
|
Description
|
|
Key Objectives
|
Retirement
|
401(k) plan
|
|
Executives participate on the same basis as our associates
|
|
No pension or supplemental retirement plans; no deferred compensation arrangements
|
The Committee does not maintain policies for allocating among short-term and long-term compensation or among cash and non-cash compensation. Instead, the Committee maintains flexibility and adjusts different elements of compensation based upon its evaluation of the company’s key compensation goals. As a general matter, the Committee seeks to utilize equity-based awards to motivate executives to enhance long-term shareholder value and manage the dilutive effects of equity compensation through
the company’s
share repurchase program.
While compensation levels may differ among NEOs based on competitive factors and the role, responsibilities and performance of each NEO, there are no material differences in the compensation philosophies, objectives or policies for our NEOs. However, as
an
executive assume
s
more responsibility, a greater percentage of total target cash compensation is allocated to annual
performance
bonus compensation, and a greater percentage of total direct compensation is allocated to equity compensation. The Committee does not maintain a policy regarding internal pay equity, but the Committee considers internal pay equity as part of its overall review of our compensation programs.
Ali
gnment with Compensation Best Practices
The Committee reviews our compensation programs,
competitive market
data and best practices in the executive compensation area. In past years, the Committee has recommended
,
and our Board has approved
,
changes in our compensation policies and practices to align with best practices. Key features of our compensation programs that the Committee believes align with best practices in executive compensation are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PRACTICES
|
What We Do
|
|
What We Don’t Do
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We benchmark executive compensation against market data developed by F.W. Cook, our independent compensation consultant. Peer companies are reviewed by the Committee annually to assure their appropriateness for benchmarking executive compensation.
|
|
|
|
We do not provide employment agreements. No NEO has an employment agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We generally target the fixed and variable elements of our executives’ compensation at the median of the market data.
|
|
|
|
We do not provide excessive perquisites, other than those generally available to our associates and other limited perquisites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use a pay-for-performance executive compensation model, with a significant portion of executive compensation at-risk and/or long-term.
|
|
|
|
We do not have severance agreements with our NEOs, other than in connection with a change in control, and other than our executive severance plan which provides for severance in very limited circumstances. Our change in control agreements do not provide for tax “gross-ups.”
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What We Do
|
|
What We Don’t Do
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We grant RSUs and stock options with extended vesting periods, which promote retention and motivate our executives to create sustained, long-term shareholder value.
|
|
|
|
We do not have “single trigger” accelerated vesting of equity awards upon a change in control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We regularly review senior level promotion and succession plans, including for the CEO position.
|
|
|
|
We do not maintain executive pension plans or supplemental executive retirement plans (SERP), nor do we provide our executives with deferred compensation arrangements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We maintain a reasonable share burn rate. During fiscal year 2017, our burn rate was 1.26%; our 3-year average burn rate for fiscal 2015 through fiscal 2017 was 1.16%.
|
|
|
|
Our equity incentive plans expressly prohibit option repricing (including cash buyouts) of underwater options and share recycling for options and stock appreciation rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We maintain a clawback policy to recoup incentive compensation in the event of a significant financial restatement (whether or not a covered officer engaged in misconduct), as well as in cases of breach of non-competition and other covenants.
|
|
|
|
We prohibit our associates and non-executive directors from engaging in hedging transactions in company stock, trading options or other derivatives, or pledging or holding company shares in margin accounts. We strictly limit pledging of company stock as collateral for non-margin account loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We consider shareholder advisory votes and views in determining our executive compensation policies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We maintain stock ownership guidelines for executives, other senior officers and non-executive directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharehol
der Engagement
We provide our shareholders with an annual “say on pay” advisory vote on executive compensation. At our
2017
Annual Shareholders Meeting held on
January
2
6
,
2017
, the advisory v
ote received the support of 98.9
% of the votes cast at the annual meeting.
In its review of our executive compensation programs, the Committee carefully considered the results of the
2017
advisory vote on executive compensation. In addition, we continually monitor the corporate governance and other views of our major institutional shareholders to assure alignment of our governance and compensation practices with our institutional shareholders’ standards.
We are committed to continued engagement between shareholders and the company, both through the formal “say on pay” advisory vote as well as an informal dialogue with our major institutional shareholders.
We are recommending that our shareholders vote in favor of conducting an annual “say on pay” advisory vote, and will consider our shareholders’ vote in determining whether to continue to
hold the “say on pay” advisory vote on an annual basis. The Committee will consider feedback from our shareholders along with the results of the
“say on pay”
advisory vote as it completes its annual review of each pay element and the total compensation packages for our NEOs with respect to the next fiscal year.
34
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Com
pensation Committee
The Committee is directly responsible for determining, in consultation with our Board, the goals and objectives of our executive compensation programs and for the ongoing review and evaluation of our compensation programs to determine whether our compensation programs are achieving their intended objectives. The Committee also evaluates the design and mix of our compensation programs and makes adjustments, as appropriate, to achieve our compensation philosophy. In consultation with our Board, the Committee has primary responsibility for overseeing and approving all compensation matters relating to, and setting the compensation levels of, the NEOs and our other executive officers and senior officers. The Committee also administers our equity compensation plans. Members of management and independent consultants provide input and recommendations to the Committee, but decisions are ultimately made by the Committee.
How Compens
ation Decisions Are Made
Each August, the Committee receives a formal presentation from F.W. Cook, its independent compensation consultant, on the competitiveness of the company’s compensation programs, as well as its alignment with the company’s compensation objectives. Based on the benchmarking data prepared by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant and the consultant’s evaluation of the company’s compensation programs, our Human Resources department, with input from our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, compiles management’s recommendations for our annual performance bonus plan for the upcoming fiscal year and equity award grants. The Committee generally meets in
September
to review and consider the preliminary management recommendations and makes its final compensation decisions at its
October
meeting when the company’s fiscal year financial results are being considered by our Board. At its
October
meeting, the Committee also reviews achievement of the prior fiscal year’s annual performance bonus plan financial metrics and each NEO’s G&Os, and approves the annual bonus payouts. Base salary adjustments are made for our executive officers and other senior officers at the time of their individual performance reviews. Depending on company or individual circumstances, the Committee also may make other compensation decisions during the year.
Role of Execu
tive Officers in Compensation Decisions
As part of its process, the Committee meets with our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman to obtain recommendations with respect to the structure of our compensation programs and compensation decisions, including the performance of individual executives. The Committee obtains our Chairman’s input on the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, and our Chief Executive Officer provides the Committee with input on the compensation of the other NEOs and other executive officers and senior officers. Our Human Resources department collects and analyzes relevant data, including comparative compensation data prepared by F.W. Cook, which is used by the Committee to make compensation decisions.
Com
pensation Consultant
The Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any third-party compensation consultant and to obtain advice and assistance from internal and external legal, accounting and other advisors. Beginning in 2009, the Committee has relied on competitive market data and analysis prepared by its independent compensation consultant, F.W. Cook. To assist the Committee with its compensation decisions, F.W. Cook recommends to the Committee peer companies and general industry survey data for benchmarking, and provides competitive compensation data, benchmarking and analysis relating to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executives and senior officers based on such market data. Please see the section below “―
Competitive Positioning
”
beginning
on page
43
for information about our peer companies and our competitive market data. F.W. Cook also furnishes the Committee with competitive compensation data for non-executive directors. F.W. Cook has not provided any other services to the company and will not provide any other services to the company without the approval of the Committee.
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
35
Fiscal Year 201
7
Execut
ive Compensation
Summary of Fiscal Year 201
7
Compensation Decisions
The Committee believes that management
skillfully
executed
our business plan as market conditions improved in fiscal 2017 and the overall manufacturing sector returned to growth
.
However, the pricing environment continued to remain a headwind for our business.
Our results in fiscal 2017 reflected these market dynamics, as well as strong execution by management. Organic revenue growth and adjusted operating margin, as computed for purposes of our annual performance bonus plan, were below the target levels. The Committee determined that each NEO exceeded or greatly exceeded his or her individual goals, and overall individual performance for each NEO was strong or outstanding.
Based on company and individual performance, the Committee believes that compensation levels for fiscal year
2017
were appropriate and consistent with the philosophy and objectives of the company’s compensation programs. The following summarizes fiscal
2017
compensation results:
|
·
|
|
base salaries generally approximated the median of the
competitive
market data, with the exception of Mr. Gershwind,
whose base salary remained below the market 25
th
percentile;
|
|
·
|
|
based on
company performance against target performance goals and
achievement levels of each NEO’s individual goals and objectives (G&Os) under our performance bonus plan, and the Committee’s determination of the appropriate individual performance multiplier, payouts under our performance bonus plan
were 114.9% of target for Mr. Gershwind and 91.5
% of target
for our other NEOs
;
|
|
·
|
|
total cash compensation for Mr. Gershwind
approximated
the
7
5
th
percentile of the
competitive
market data; total direct compensation for Mr. Gershwind was
4.5
% below the 25
th
percentile of the
competitive
market data;
|
|
·
|
|
total cash compensation for Messrs. Jilla and Jones approximated the 50
th
percentile of the
competitive
market data; total direct compensation for Mr. Jilla also approximated the 50
th
percentile of the
competitive
market data, while
total direct compensation for Mr. Jones was between the 50
th
percentile and 75
th
percentiles of the
competitive
market data;
and
|
|
·
|
|
total cash compensation for Mr. Armstrong and Ms. Heerdt approximated the 25
th
percentile of the
competitive
market data; total direct compensation for Mr. Armstrong also approximated the 25
th
percentile of the
competitive
market data while total direct compensation for Ms. Heerdt was between the 25
th
and 50
th
percentiles of the
competitive
market data.
|
Elements of Compensation
We allocate c
ompensation among the following components for our NEOs:
|
·
|
|
annual performance bonuses;
|
|
·
|
|
stock-based compensation in the form of stock options and RSUs; and
|
Base Salary
Base salaries for our executive officers are established based on the scope of their responsibilities and considering competitive market compensation paid by other companies for similar positions, as well as salaries paid to the executives’ peers within the company. Base salaries are reviewed each year in connection with the executives’ performance evaluations and may be adjusted based on competitive market data, individual performance and promotions or changed responsibilities. The Committee seeks to target base salary levels at or below the market median. However, in individual cases, base salary levels may differ based upon the executive’s experience, individual performance and other considerations.
In fiscal 2017, all NEO base salaries were increased 3.0%, consistent with the overall budget for base salary increases for executive and senior officers.
Mr. Gershwind’s base salary was
36
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
increased from $705,713
to $726,884,
effective
January
1,
2017
,
and remains below the market 25
th
percentile. Mr. Jilla’s
base salary was increased from
$489,250
to $503,928
in
July 201
7
, approximating the median of the market data. Mr. Jones’ base salary was increased from $388,430
to $400,083
,
approximating
the market median. Mr. Armstrong’s base salary was increased from $388,410
to $400,062
,
approximating the
median of the market data. Ms. Heerdt’s base salary was increased from $334,750
to $344,793
, remaining between the 25
th
percentile and median of the market data.
Annual P
erformance Bonus P
rogram
For fiscal year 2017, we modified our annual performance bonus plan so
that
payout levels based on financial performance
used
only two financial metrics –
organic
revenue growth
percentage
and operating margin, weighted at 37.5% each. For fiscal year 2016, we measured financial performance based on three financial metrics –
organic
revenue growth
percentage
, operating margin and operating income growth, each weighted 25.0%. We made this change because our emphasis changed from fiscal year 2016, where we were more focused on gross margin stabilization and operating expense reductions, to fiscal year 2017, where our strategy was to focus more on organic revenue
growth and market share gain.
As in fiscal 2016, the remaining 25% of the target bonus opportunity was
based on the achievement of individual G&Os. In addition, award opportunities were subject to an individual performance multiplier. Maximum bonus payouts are capped at 200% of target.
Bonus award opportunities are designed to provide market based, competitive award opportunities with
target amounts
designed to result in total cash compensation
approximating the median of the market data and payouts at stretch performance
designed to result in total cash compensation
approximating the 75
th
percentile of the market data.
The Committee retains discretion to reduce annual bonus payouts below the amounts otherwise payable under the performance bonus program where it determines that bonus amounts are not reflective of company and individual performance. For threshold, target and maximum dollar amounts of performance bonus opportunities under our performance bonus program for the NEOs, please see the
Fiscal Year
2017
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
table on page
51
of this proxy statement.
Company Financial Metrics
Company financial metrics are established by the Committee based on the company’s business plan, as reviewed and approved by the Committee, and consistent with analysts’ consensus expectations. For fiscal
2017
, company financial metrics were:
|
·
|
|
organic revenue growth (year-over-year);
and
|
In setting award opportunities, the plan provides for four payout levels
based on achievement of
company financial metrics, as follows:
|
·
|
|
threshold – payout at 25% of target based on minimum level of performance;
|
|
·
|
|
target – payout at target based on achievement at target levels, which are aligned with our budget;
|
|
·
|
|
stretch performance – payout at 125% of target based on achievement of stretch goals that represent market leading performance, and intended to provide
total cash compensation
levels approximating the 75
th
percentile of the market data; and
|
|
·
|
|
maximum – payout at 160% of target based on superior performance.
|
In
fiscal year 2017, we
changed the design of
our annual performance bonus plan to reward performance relative to the
Metalworking Business Index (“
MBI
”)
. As we have noted, a high percentage of our sales are to the U.S. manufacturing sector, and therefore a high correlation
exists
between
trends in our customers’ activity and
changes in the MBI Index. We have found
the
highest correlation
between our sales trends and
the MBI using the rolling 12-month MBI average on a
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
37
four-month lag
basis
. For fiscal year 2017, we set the four payout levels (threshold, target, stretch performance and maximum) based on performance under three U.S. manufacturing macro scenarios: “Status Quo,” where the applicable rolling 12-month MBI remained below 46.1; “Improving,” where the 12-month MBI improved to between 46.1 and 49; and “Recovery,” where the 12-month MBI improved to greater than 49.
The following table sets forth the payout level opportunities available for our NEOs
in fiscal 2017
as a percentage of the target award for each company financial metric (with each financial metric having a weighting of
37.5
%) based on different levels of performance. No payout for any financial metric is made if the threshold performance level for that financial metric is not achieved. For performance between the different payout levels indicated below, straight-line interpolation is used to arrive at the actual payout
.
Based on the rolling 12-month MBI Index (on a four-month lag
basis
) as of our fiscal year 2017 year-end, we measured our performance and determined bonus payouts
under
the
“
Recovery
”
scenario (performance metrics under the
“
Status Quo
”
and
“Improving”
scenarios included
organic
revenue growth of (4.0)% and (2.0)% at target and operating margins of 12.1% and 12.6% at target, respectively):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic
Revenue
Growth
(%)
|
Operating
Margin %
|
Payout of
Each Metric
as a % of
Target
|
|
|
Threshold
|
0.0
|
13.
1
|
9.4
|
|
|
Target
|
3.0
|
13.
8
|
37.5
|
|
|
Stretch
|
8
.0
|
1
5.1
|
46.9
|
|
|
Maximum
|
10
.0
|
15.6
|
60.0
|
|
We have determined that setting payout levels for financial metrics in different MBI scenarios does not appropriately reward performance. As a result, our performance bonus plan for fiscal 2018 will fix payout levels based on achievement of financial metrics measured against our fiscal 2018 operating plan.
Actual Financial Performance vs. Target Goals
The table below shows the actual performance for the company financial metrics versus target:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
Actual
|
Payout of
Each Metric
as a % of
Target
|
|
|
Organic Revenue Growth (%)
|
3.0
|
2.9
|
36.2
|
|
|
Operating Margin (%)
|
13.
8
|
13.2
|
15.7
|
|
In calculating year-over-year organic revenue growth, we did not include post-acquisition sales of DECO, which we acquired on
July
31, 2017. In addition, we adjusted for fiscal 2016 having six additional business days, which had the effect of increasing our year-over-year organic revenue growth from 0.8% to 2.9%. In calculating operating margin, we excluded the results of DECO, as well as acquisition-related costs incurred, which had the effect of increasing operating margin from 13.1% to 13.2%. Consistent with prior practice, the Committee set the targets to exclude these items to achieve comparability and the incentive purpose of the annual performance bonus program.
38
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Individual Goals and Objectives (G&Os)
Achievement of individual G&Os has a 25% weighting in our performance bonus plan. Individual G&Os are established annually and include strategic initiatives with both financial and non-financial goals. Executives are evaluated based upon achievement of these goals. At
the
end of each year, our CEO evaluates performance against the pre-established individual objectives for officers other than himself and submits a recommendation to the Committee. The Committee evaluates our CEO’s performance against his pre-established individual objectives. Based on the Committee’s evaluation of the CEO and the CEO’s recommendations, the Committee determines and approves the achievement and payout level of the G&Os for each executive officer. The following table sets forth the payout level opportunities that were available for our NEOs as a percentage of the target award for the individual G&Os based on different levels of performance. No payout is made if the threshold (partially meets) performance level is not achieved:
|
|
|
|
|
Individual G&Os
Performance Level
|
Payout as a
% of Target
|
|
|
Partially meets
|
18.75
|
|
|
Achieves
|
25
.0
|
|
|
Exceeds
|
31.25
|
|
|
Greatly Exceeds
|
40.0
|
|
Achievement of Individual G&Os
For fiscal 2017, the Committee determined that Mr. Gershwind greatly exceeded achievement of his individual G&Os, resulting in a payout of 40.0% of target
, and each other NEO exceeded
achievement
of his or her individual G&Os
, resulting in a payout of 31.25%
of target
.
The Committee considered each NEO’s individual performance goals and performance, including the following:
|
·
|
|
Erik Gershwind
– Drove the fiscal 2017 operating plan to continue to grow market share, build on our leadership position in metalworking, as well as develop a leadership position
for, and complete the integration of, our
Class C inventory business.
Focus also included stabilizing our gross margin and growing operating margin. Continued to roll out our long-term strategy while increasing operating rigor, reducing expenses, and driving accountability.
Also continued to embed
our deep technical expertise across industries and optimize our
customers’ operations
with inventory management and other supply chain solutions
. Increased customer focus across all support functions and created industry-leading levels of customer loyalty
. Completed acquisition of DECO.
|
|
·
|
|
Rustom Jilla
–
Built plan and drove business to grow operating margin.
Cultivated our M&A pipeline
and completing DECO acquisition.
Improved operating discipline across
our company
with project pre-investment evaluations, tighter project management including CCSG integration, OpEx controls and by driving accountability.
Continued to strengthen
our
Finance team and develop talent.
Served as a spokes
perso
n
to the investor community.
Reduced enterprise risk by implementing SAP Core Financials on time and on budget.
|
|
·
|
|
Douglas Jones
– Implemented phase one of multi-year IT Roadmap on-time and on-budget
,
including
SAP Core Financial
s
and
new
t
elephony
system.
Launched consolidation of internal managed inventory and vending supply solutions to improve service, efficiency and profitability of supply chain.
Provided customers with technology tools to optimize their supply chain costs, drive competitive advantage and leverage their data.
Focused on succession planning.
|
|
·
|
|
Steve Armstrong
– Negotiated and successfully closed the acquisition of DECO.
Positioned
our
company to leverage learnings from current acquisition to develop repeatable formula for future acquisitions. Resolved successfully several major contract disputes. Continue
d
to develop a succession plan and bench strength.
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
39
|
·
|
|
Kari Heerdt
– Continued to enhance the talent acquisition, leadership development, succession, and reward processes and program. Aligned people processes with MSC’s associate value proposition, leadership competencies, culture, and values. Launched new signature leadership programs, including a renewed focus on diversity and inclusion. Built organizational capability in change management.
|
Individual Performance Multiplier
Payout levels based on achievement of the company financial metrics and individual G&Os are subject to an individual performance multiplier. We designed our performance bonus plan with this individual performance multiplier to provide greater weighting based on individual performance, consistent with our performance based compensation philosophy. The individual performance multiplier evaluation differs from the evaluation of individual G&Os and is based on an evaluation of the executive’s overall leadership and effectiveness. Based on the Committee’s evaluation of the CEO and the CEO’s recommendations, the Committee determines and approves the individual performance multiplier for each executive officer. The individual performance multiplier is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
|
Payout
|
|
|
Does Not Meet
|
0
%
|
|
|
Partial
|
50
%
|
|
|
Good
|
100%
|
|
|
Strong
|
110
%
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
125
%
|
|
As set forth in the following section, the Committee determined an individual performance multiplier of 125% for Mr. Gershwind and 110% for each of Ms. Heerdt and Messrs. Jilla, Jones and Armstrong.
Fiscal 201
7
Performance Bonuses for NEOs
The following table summarizes the computations for the NEOs’ performance bonuses for fiscal 2017. The performance bonus payouts were 114.9% of target for Mr. Gershwind and 91.5% of target for each other NEO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEO
|
Target Bonus
Amount
|
Financial
Metrics
|
Individual
G&Os
|
Individual
Performance
Multiplier
|
2017
Actual
Bonus
|
|
(A) ($)
|
(B)
|
(C)
|
(D)
|
(E)= (B+C)xD ($)
|
Erik Gershwind
|
1,500,000
|
778,545
|
600,000
|
125%
|
1,723,180
|
Rustom Jilla
|
352,749
|
183,087
|
110,234
|
110%
|
322,654
|
Douglas Jones
|
220,046
|
114,210
|
68,764
|
110%
|
201,272
|
Steve Armstrong
|
176,027
|
91,363
|
55,009
|
110%
|
161,009
|
Kari Heerdt
|
172,396
|
89,479
|
53,874
|
110%
|
157,688
|
The Committee retains discretion to reduce annual bonus payouts below the amounts otherwise payable under the performance bonus program where it determines that bonus amounts are not reflective of company and individual performance. The Committee did not make any such adjustments for fiscal year 2017.
Annual bonus awards for the NEOs were made under our shareholder-approved 201
5
Omnibus Incentive Plan to qualify as deductible performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Awards under the plan were made at levels of 1% of EBIT for our CEO and 0.6% of EBIT for other executive officers, subject to the Committee’s exercise of discretion to reduce the actual payouts. Consistent with the Committee’s policy, the Committee exercised its discretion to reduce the payouts under the awards so that actual payouts were equal to the payouts determined under our 2017 annual performance bonus program.
The Committee believes that bonuses awarded under our annual performance bonus program appropriately reflected the company’s performance and appropriately rewarded the performance of the NEOs.
40
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Long-T
erm Stock-Based Compensation
The Committee grants stock options and RSUs under our
2015
Omnibus Incentive Plan to provide competitive compensation, promote retention, and align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders. We believe that providing combined grants of stock options and RSUs effectively focuses our executives on delivering long-term value to our shareholders. Stock options motivate our executives to increase shareowner value because the options only have value to the extent the price of MSC stock on the date of exercise exceeds the stock price on the date of grant, and thus compensation is realized only if the company’s stock price increases over the term of the award. RSUs reward and retain the executives by offering them the opportunity to receive MSC shares on the date the restrictions lapse so long as they continue to be employed by the company. Dividends are not paid on unvested RSUs; instead, dividend equivalent units accrue on unvested RSUs and vest at the same times as the underlying RSUs. The Committee does not have a fixed policy on allocating between options and RSU awards, but seeks to balance the retentive value of RSU awards which have a more stable value as compared with options. The mix of fiscal year 2017 grants was 55% RSUs and 45% stock options, based on their respective grant date values.
The Committee’s policy is for stock options to vest in four equal increments on each of the first four anniversary dates of the date of grant, which is longer than the median 3-year vesting period of our peer companies, and for stock options to have terms of seven years. For grants of RSUs, the Committee’s policy provides for vesting in five increments of 20% on each of the first through fifth anniversaries of the grants, which also is longer than the median 3-year vesting period of our peer companies. The Committee believes that this aspect of our equity compensation package promotes executive retention and management stability, and fosters focus on long-term growth aligned with building shareholder value.
In granting equity awards, the Committee takes into consideration the dilutive effect on earnings to our shareholders once the shares are issued or vested, and we seek to mitigate this effect by repurchasing shares from time to time under
the company’s share
buyback program. We also evaluate and benchmark the company’s annual equity grants as a percentage of outstanding shares and the fully diluted overhang of outstanding equity awards plus shares available for grant. Our burn rate (or the number of shares of Class A common stock subject to equity awards granted during the fiscal year as a percentage of the weighted-average outstanding shares of common stock) for fiscal 2017 was 1.2
6
%, between the median and 75
th
percentiles of our peer companies; our 3-year average burn rate for fiscal 2015 through fiscal 2017 was 1.15%, which approximates the 75
th
percentile of our peer companies. Our fully diluted equity overhang as of the fiscal 2017 year end was between the median and 75
th
percentile of our peer companies, and reflects additional shares available for future grant obtained through the approval by our shareholders of the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan in
January 201
5. Our fully diluted overhang attributable to grants outstanding as of the fiscal 2017 fiscal year end approximates the 25
th
percentile of our peer companies.
As discussed below under “
Change of Control Arrangements
,
”
the vesting of unvested stock options, restricted stock and RSUs only accelerates if there is both a change in control of the company and if such awards are not continued, assumed or substituted in connection with the transaction or if there is a termination of employment without cause (or for executives with change in control agreements, a termination by the executive for good reason) within one year (two years for executives with change in control agreements) following the change in control. Because there is no acceleration of awards unless there is both a change in control and either the awards would be terminated or the grantee’s employment is terminated following the change in control, our outstanding equity awards are subject to “double trigger” accelerated vesting.
Equity Grants During Fiscal Year 201
7
The number of stock options and RSUs granted to the NEOs in fiscal year 2017, and the grant-date fair value of these awards determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, are shown in
the
Fiscal Year 201
7
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
table on page
51
of this
proxy statement. Equity awards granted in
October 201
6 were benchmarked against the competitive market data and resulted in target
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
41
total direct compensation approximating the 25
th
percentile for Mr. Gershwind, approximating the median for Messrs. Jilla and Armstrong and Ms. Heerdt, and approximating the 75
th
percentile for Mr. Jones.
Administration of Equity Award Grants
The Committee grants options with exercise prices set at the market price on the date of grant, based on the closing market price on the date of grant. Our current policy is that options and RSU awards to executive officers and other senior officers are granted on an annual basis at the
October
meeting of the Committee, which occurs when our Board reviews annual financial results and when the Committee completes its annual compensation review process. The approval process specifies:
|
·
|
|
the individual receiving the grant;
|
|
·
|
|
the dollar value of stock options, with the number of options to be determined based on a Black-Scholes valuation; and
|
|
·
|
|
the dollar value of RSUs, with the number of RSUs to be determined based on the closing price of our shares on the date of grant.
|
Grants for associates other than officers also are approved by the Committee
,
and the Committee does not delegate authority for making grants to any member of management. Our current policy provides that off-cycle grants and promotion and new hire grants may be approved at regularly scheduled or special Committee meetings. We do not time our equity award grants relative to the release of material non-public information.
Hedging Policy
; Pledging
Under our insider trading policy, short-selling, margin transactions, trading in exchange-traded options and engaging in hedging transactions such as prepaid variable forward contracts are prohibited with respect to our common stock. Our insider trading policy also prohibits pledging company shares in margin accounts. Associates and directors may only pledge company shares as collateral for a loan outside of a margin account up to 10% of their ownership of company shares (excluding options and unvested RSUs and restricted shares), provided that shares required to be held pursuant to our stock ownership guidelines may not be pledged. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee retains discretion to permit limited exceptions to the 10% restriction. None of our executive officers or directors currently has pledged any company shares.
Benefits
and Perquisites
We provide our executives with certain health and insurance benefits, as well as travel and other perquisites. Our executives can participate in our 401(k) plan (which includes company matching contributions of 50% up to the first 6% of a participant’s contributions), our Associate Stock Purchase Plan and our health benefit and insurance programs on the same basis as our associates. We also provide our executives with either a car allowance or a leased vehicle. Generally, our travel policies provide that executives travel coach class (domestic) and business class (international) on company business and pay the travel and related expenses of any family member that may accompany them.
We do not provide any other executive perquisites such as supplemental life insurance, financial planning, country club membership, or special health benefits.
Change of Control Arrangements
Our current NEOs are parties to “change in control” severance arrangements. For a description of our executives’ change in control agreements, please see the section entitled
“
Executive Compensation — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
”
beginning
on page
55
of this proxy statement.
We believe that such arrangements are important to promote the stability of our business and our key personnel during the transition period surrounding a change in control transaction, and to keep our executives focused on the business rather than on their employment prospects. These arrangements
42
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
serve to assure the retention of key executives in order to successfully execute a change of control transaction. To this end, the change of control benefits only are provided if the executive remains with the company through the change of control and if there is a termination of employment without cause or by the executive for good reason, commonly referred to as a “double trigger.”
Please see the section entitled “
Executive Compensation — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control — Change in Control Agreements
”
beginning
on page
55
of this proxy statement.
As discussed in more detail in the section entitled “
Executive Compensation — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control — Equity Award Plans
” on page
56
of this proxy statement,
since
January 200
6, all stock options and RSU and restricted stock awards have b
een made under our 2005 and 2015
Omnibus Incentive Plans. Under our Omnibus Incentive Plans, in the event of a change in control transaction pursuant to a merger agreement, outstanding stock options and restricted stock and RSU awards shall be continued, assumed or substituted if so provided in the merger agreement. If the merger agreement does not provide for continuation, assumption or substitution of equity awards, the vesting of outstanding options shall accelerate and the restrictions applicable to all restricted stock and RSU awards shall lapse. In addition, following any change in control, if an associate’s employment is terminated without cause within one year following the change in control, vesting shall also accelerate. For executive officers with change in control agreements, the protection period is extended to two years and vesting also accelerates in cases of termination by the executive for good reason. The Committee believes that these provisions provide our Board with appropriate flexibility to address the treatment of options and restricted stock and RSU awards in a merger or similar transaction that is approved by our Board, while providing appropriate protections to our executives and other associates in transactions which are not approved by our Board. Because there is no acceleration of awards unless there is both a change in control and either the awards are terminated or the grantee’s employment is terminated following the change in control, our outstanding equity awards are subject to “double trigger” accelerated vesting.
Executive Severance Plan
Under our Executive Severan
ce Plan, adopted in
October 201
6
, Vice Presidents, Senior Vice Presidents and Executive Vice Presidents of the Company are eligible to receive certain severance benefits in the event of limited qualifying termination events. Please see the section entitled
“
Executive Compensation — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control — Executive Severance Plan
” on page
57
of this proxy statement.
Compet
itive Positioning
In determining the amounts of base salary, performance bonus plan opportunities and stock-based compensation for the NEOs, and other executive officers and senior officers, the Committee reviewed and benchmarked the compensation levels of the NEOs and other executive officers and senior officers against competitive market data developed by F.W. Cook. Market data developed by F.W. Cook was comprised of peer group compensation data for the CEO, CFO and three other most highly compensated executives, as reported in the proxy statements of peer companies, together with compensation data by functional position derived from third-party general industry surveys. Survey data for each position was collected based on functional matches within a revenue range comparable in size to our company.
In developing our peer group of companies, F.W. Cook consults with the company’s Human Resources department and the Committee Chair to identify companies similar in size and business mix. In addition, by balancing the peer company data with compensation data from broad general industry surveys, the Committee believes that the benchmarking data is more representative of the market place for executive talent and less subject to distortion.
In
July 201
7, upon the recommendation of F.W. Cook, the Committee approved changes to our peer group. Airgas, Inc. was removed because it was acquired by Air Liquide in 2016. United Natural Foods, Inc. was removed because it is outside a revenue range of 1/3X to 3X as compared to our revenues, and Lawson Products, Inc. was removed because it is outside such revenue range and the market cap range of 1/4X to 4X as compared to our market cap. NOW Inc. and Pool Corporation were added as
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
43
peer companies, as they both fall within such revenue and market cap ranges and are in the same GICS industry as the company. The two broad general industry survey sources were the same as used for fiscal 2016. In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, references to our NEOs’ actual fiscal 2017 compensation in relation to the market data are based on the market data presented by F.W. Cook to the Committee in
August 201
7. The Committee believes that the competitive market data compiled by F.W. Cook provides an appropriate benchmarking resource.
The fiscal 2017 peer group (which is used with the two broad general industry surveys to arrive at the competitive market data) is listed in the chart below, together with comparative information about revenue, net income, market capitalization, total assets and number of employees compiled by F.W. Cook based on publicly available information:
(Dollars in
millions
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
Revenue
(1)
|
Net
Income
(1),(2)
|
Total
Assets
(3)
|
Market
Cap
(4)
|
Employees
(5)
|
Anixter International Inc.
|
$7,748
|
$148
|
$4,204
|
$2,427
|
8,900
|
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.
|
2,594
|
134
|
1,388
|
2,255
|
5,554
|
Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc.
|
4,200
|
100
|
3,140
|
2,817
|
5,042
|
DXP Enterprises, Inc.
|
942
|
15
|
612
|
465
|
2,453
|
Fastenal Company
|
4,130
|
525
|
2,851
|
12,233
|
19,624
|
Kaman Corporation
|
1,771
|
52
|
1,449
|
1,378
|
5,265
|
MRC Global Inc.
|
3,296
|
(46)
|
2,232
|
1,516
|
3,516
|
NOW Inc.
|
2,340
|
(167)
|
1,698
|
1,278
|
4,200
|
Patterson Companies, Inc.
|
5,593
|
171
|
3,508
|
3,545
|
7,500
|
Pool Corporation
|
2,671
|
164
|
1,279
|
4,155
|
3,900
|
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
|
4,366
|
64
|
2,692
|
1,606
|
6,180
|
ScanSource, Inc.
|
3,568
|
69
|
1,718
|
950
|
2,000
|
Watsco, Inc.
|
4,303
|
193
|
2,154
|
4,836
|
5,050
|
WESCO International, Inc.
|
7,331
|
103
|
4,624
|
2,437
|
9,000
|
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
|
10,223
|
519
|
5,862
|
9,449
|
25,600
|
Summary Percentiles: 15 Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
th
Percentile
|
$4,979
|
$168
|
$3,324
|
$3,850
|
8,200
|
Median
|
4,130
|
103
|
2,232
|
2,427
|
5,265
|
25
th
Percentile
|
2,633
|
58
|
1,574
|
1,447
|
4,050
|
MSC Industrial Direct
(6)
|
$2,879
|
$233
|
$2,051
|
$3,939
|
6,462
|
– Percentile Rank
|
31%
|
87%
|
41%
|
76%
|
66%
|
_____________________________
|
(1)
|
|
Determined as of the most recently reported four fiscal quarters ended prior to
August 201
7.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Excludes
extraordinary items and discontinued operations.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Determined as of the most recently reported fiscal quarter end prior to
August 201
7.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Determined as of
September
2
, 2017, as calculated by a third-party vendor.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Determined as of the most recently reported fiscal year end prior to
August 201
7.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Data for MSC is with respect to the four fiscal quarters ended
June
3, 2017, the company’s last quarter ended prior to
August 201
7.
|
The Committee generally seeks to set base salary, total target cash compensation (the sum of base salary and target annual performance bonus) and total target direct compensation (the sum of total target cash compensation and long-term equity compensation) at the median, or 50
th
percentile, of the market data. Total cash compensation based on achievement of stretch performance goals under our performance bonus generally is targeted to approximate the 75
th
percentile of the market data. Long-term equity compensation in the form of stock options and RSUs generally are targeted to approximate the median of the market data.
The Committee believes that this competitive positioning is
44
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
consistent with the goals of the company’s compensation programs, by linking pay to performance and providing top-tier compensation only when the company achieves superior performance.
Execut
ive Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy
Upon recommendation of the Committee, our Board adopted in
October 200
9 an Executive Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy. The policy covers all executive officers of the company, as well as the company’s corporate controller, and applies to inc
entive awards under our annual performance bonus
plan and equity awards under our equity plans, granted or awarded after the adoption of the
p
olicy. The policy provides our Board with discretion to obtain recoupment of awards as follows:
|
·
|
|
in the event of a significant restatement of financial results, other than as a result of a change in accounting principles (a “Restatement”), the Board may recoup cash incentive bonuses and equity awards that were paid or that vested to the extent that the amount paid or that vested would have been lower if the financial results had been properly reported;
|
|
·
|
|
in the event of a Restatement where a covered officer engaged in misconduct that caused or partially caused the need for the Restatement, the Board may take any or all of the following actions with respect to such covered officer: (i) recoup all cash incentive bonuses and equity awards that were paid or that vested based upon the achievement of financial results that were subsequently reduced due to the Restatement, (ii) cancel outstanding equity awards, (iii) recoup any shares received from the vesting or exercise of equity awards, and (iv) recoup any net proceeds from any sale of shares upon or following the vesting or exercise of equity awards; and
|
|
·
|
|
in the event that following termination of employment, a covered officer breaches his or her non-competition, non-solicitation or non-disclosure covenants owed to the company, the Board may take any or all of the following actions with respect to such covered officer: (i) cancel outstanding equity awards, (ii) recoup any shares received from the vesting or exercise of equity awards during the period beginning two years before and ending two years after the covered officer’s termination of employment, and (iii) recoup any net proceeds from any sale of shares upon or following the vesting or exercise of equity awards during the period beginning two years before and ending two years after the covered officer’s termination of employment.
|
The Board
may
only
seek recoupment in cases of a Restatement if either the Restatement shall have occurred within 36 months of the publication of the audited financial statements that have been restated, or the Audit Committee of the Board shall have taken steps to consider a Restatement prior to the end of such 36 months and the Restatement occurs within 48 months of the publication of the audited financial statements.
In addition, our equity award documents provide for forfeiture of awards in cases where a grantee violates a confidentiality, non-competition or non-solicitation covenant or agreement and for recoupment in cases
where, following a termination of employment, the company determines that a termination for cause would have been justified prior to such termination.
In the event of a change in control, as defined in our Omnibus Incentive Plans, the company’s right to seek recoupment shall terminate.
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
45
Execut
ive Stock Ownership Guidelines
To more closely align the interests of our management with those of our shareholders, our Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, adopted in
November 201
1 stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers. The ownership guidelines provide for each of our executive officers to own a minimum number of shares having a value equal to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Role
|
Minimum Value of Shares
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
6 times annual base salary
|
|
|
Executive Vice Presidents
|
3 times annual base salary
|
|
|
Senior Vice Presidents
|
2 times annual base salary
|
|
|
Vice Presidents
|
1 times annual base salary
|
|
All shares held by our executives, including unvested restricted shares and RSUs but not including shares underlying unexercised stock options, count toward these guidelines. The guidelines provide for our executives to reach these goals within five years from the date on which the executive is appointed. Once an executive has attained his or her minimum ownership requirement, he or she must maintain at least that level of ownership. If an executive has not satisfied his or her proportionate minimum stock ownership guideline, the executive must retain an amount equal to 100% of the net shares (i.e., after tax withholding and shares sold to pay the exercise price of option) received as a result of the exercise of stock options or the vesting of restricted shares or RSUs. All of our executive officers are in compliance with their current stock ownership guidelines. In addition to our stock ownership guidelines, we believe that the extended vesting provisions of our options and restricted stock and RSU awards for our executives properly align their interests with those of our shareholders, and encourage and incentivize long-term planning and strategic initiatives to enhance shareholder value.
Fede
ral Income Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 prevents us from taking a tax deduction for non-performance-based compensation in excess of $1
million
in any fiscal year paid to our CEO and the three other most highly compensated executive officers (excluding our CFO). We design our compensation programs to consider the effect of Section 162(m) together with the objectives of our compensation programs. Stock options granted under our equity compensation plans are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m), but annual RSU awards under such plans do not qualify as performance-based compensation, and are therefore subject to the $1
million
limit on deductible compensation. Annual cash bonuses under our fiscal year 2017 annual performance bonus program were made under our shareholder-approved 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan and are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m). Although the Compensation Committee may determine it necessary to pay non-deductible compensation to achieve our executive compensation objectives, we do not anticipate that we will pay any material non-deductible compensation.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which is currently pending before the U.S. Congress, would modify Section 162(m) by (i) expanding the provision so that it applies to our CEO, CFO, and our three other most highly compensated executive officers and (ii) eliminating the performance-based compensation exception.
If this legislation is enacted, we may not be able to take a tax deduction for any compensation paid to our CEO, CFO, or our three other most highly compensated executive officers in excess of $1
million
for payments made in taxable years beginning after
December
31, 2017.
46
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
COMPEN
SATION RISK ASSESSMENT
The Compensation Committee of our Board engaged F.W. Cook to conduct a comprehensive risk assessment of our incentive-based compensation plans in 2016 to assist the Compensation Committee in its compensation risk assessment. In its report to the Compensation Committee, F.W. Cook determined that our incentive plans were well-aligned with sound compensation design principles and that there were no significant areas of concern from a compensation risk perspective. F.W. Cook also determined that recent changes to our annual and long-term incentive programs, implemented in fiscal 2016, reflect considerable time and attention and have not elevated the riskiness of our incentive programs. In 2017, at the request of the Compensation Committee, F.W. Cook updated and confirmed its earlier assessment. Based on the Compensation Committee’s review and the F.W. Cook reports, the Compensation Committee believes that our compensation programs do not encourage excessive or inappropriate risk-taking on the part of our associates, including our executive and senior officers. The Compensation Committee believes that the design and mix of our compensation programs appropriately encourage our executive and senior officers to focus on the creation of long-term shareholder value. In its review, the Compensation Committee noted the following features:
|
·
|
|
executive and senior officer pay mix balances fixed and variable cash compensation, cash and equity, and annual and longer-term incentive compensation;
|
|
·
|
|
our executive performance bonus program includes the following design features which the Compensation Committee believes properly incentivize senior management:
|
|
-
|
|
target bonuses generally do not exceed 100% of base salary;
|
|
-
|
|
maximum payouts are capped at 200% of target;
|
|
-
|
|
payout levels based on achievement of financial metrics generally are calculated on a straight-line interpolation basis between threshold and target levels and between target and maximum levels, rather than providing for significantly different payout levels based on small changes in operating results;
|
|
-
|
|
the annual performance bonus is largely based on achievement of multiple financial metrics, rather than a single financial metric;
|
|
-
|
|
the annual performance bonus plan includes a 25% weighting for achievement of individual G&Os and also includes an individual performance multiplier, both of which are evaluated by the Compensation Committee, which serves to focus management on achievement of strategic business and long-term initiatives;
|
|
-
|
|
the Compensation Committee retains discretion to adjust company financial metrics to account for non-recurring and other similar items; and
|
|
-
|
|
the Compensation Committee retains discretion to reduce bonus payouts below the amounts otherwise payable under the performance bonus program where it determines that bonus amounts are not reflective of company and individual performance;
|
|
·
|
|
annual non-management bonus plans for corporate, sales and other business functions allocate a lower percentage of variable cash compensation than for management with bonus awards based on subjective assessment of individual performance;
|
|
·
|
|
long-term equity awards constitute a significant portion of executives’ and senior officers’ compensation, thereby focusing such individuals on enhancing long-term shareholder value; and
|
|
·
|
|
equity awards for all associates provide vesting periods of four years for stock options and five years for restricted stock and RSUs.
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
47
In addition to the design and mix of our compensation programs, to further align our executive officers’ interests with our shareholders and mitigate risk relating to our compensation programs, we have adopted an Executive Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy, which is described in the section entitled
“
Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy
,” and
stock ownership guidelines for all of our executive officers, which is described in the section entitled “
Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines
.”
CO
MPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The information contained under this “Compensation Committee Report” shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any filings under the Securities Act, or under the Exchange Act, or be subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference into any such filing.
The Compensation Committee of our Board has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis that precedes this report. Based on this review and discussion, the Committee recommended to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board,
Denis Kelly (Chairman)
Roger Fradin
Louise Goeser
Michael Kaufmann
Steven Paladino
48
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
EXEC
UTIVE COMPENSATION
Summ
ary Compensation Table
The t
able below sets forth the compensation of the following named executive officers for services rendered to the company during the fiscal years ended
September 2, 2017, September 3, 2016 and August
29, 2015:
|
·
|
|
Erik Gershwind, our President and Chief Executive Officer;
|
|
·
|
|
Rustom Jilla, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and
|
|
·
|
|
Douglas Jones, Steve Armstrong and Kari Heerdt, who were the three other most highly compensated executive officers with re
spect to, and who were serving as executive officers at the end of, fiscal year
2017
.
|
A detailed description of the plans and programs under which our named executive officers received the following compensation can be found in the section entitled “
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
” preceding this discussion. Additional information about these plans and programs is included in the additional tables and discussions which follow the Summary Compensation Table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
(1)
|
Bonus
($)
(2)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
(3)
|
Option
Awards
($)
(4)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(5)
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
(6)
|
Total
($)
|
Erik Gershwind
|
2017
|
719,148
|
—
|
825,003
|
675,002
|
1,723,180
|
19,442
|
3,961,775
|
President and
|
2016
|
700,710
|
—
|
824,953
|
674,994
|
500,000
|
20,711
|
2,721,368
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
2015
|
685,869
|
—
|
474,932
|
645,987
|
432,000
|
19,963
|
2,258,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rustom Jilla
(7)
|
2017
|
490,510
|
—
|
443,316
|
362,700
|
322,654
|
20,956
|
1,640,136
|
Executive Vice President
|
2016
|
476,811
|
—
|
384,970
|
314,993
|
117,726
|
30,490
|
1,324,990
|
and Chief Financial Officer
|
2015
|
45,673
|
—
|
499,981
|
—
|
—
|
3,825
|
549,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas Jones
|
2017
|
388,430
|
—
|
338,818
|
277,204
|
201,272
|
13,196
|
1,218,920
|
Executive Vice President,
|
2016
|
384,604
|
—
|
302,452
|
247,493
|
73,435
|
21,520
|
1,029,504
|
Chief Supply Chain Officer
|
2015
|
376,034
|
—
|
179,926
|
314,986
|
99,239
|
17,896
|
988,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Armstrong
|
2017
|
398,359
|
—
|
242,308
|
198,221
|
161,009
|
20,366
|
1,020,263
|
Senior Vice President,
|
2016
|
386,213
|
—
|
221,641
|
181,350
|
53,549
|
20,655
|
863,408
|
General Counsel, and
Corporate Secretary
|
2015
|
377,808
|
—
|
166,475
|
236,405
|
72,367
|
19,261
|
872,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kari Heerdt
|
2017
|
335,013
|
—
|
220,838
|
180,672
|
157,688
|
19,380
|
913,591
|
Senior Vice President and
|
2016
|
325,638
|
—
|
192,485
|
157,492
|
57,535
|
14,815
|
747,965
|
Chief People Officer
|
2015
|
325,050
|
100,000
|
249,904
|
199,989
|
72,367
|
18,523
|
965,833
|
_____________________________
|
(1)
|
|
The amounts shown in this column reflect the executive’s actual base salary, including amounts deferred under our 401(k) plan.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The amount in this column for Ms. Heerdt reflects an aggregate cash signing bonus of $100,000, paid in two installments, as part of Ms. Heerdt’s employment package in connection with her
August 201
4 appointment as our Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The amounts in this column do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officers nor do they reflect the actual value that will be recognized by the named executive officers. Instead, the amounts reflect the grant date fair value for grants made by us in fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. This valuation method values restricted stock and restricted stock units granted during the indicated year, based on the fair market value of our Class A common stock (the closing price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange) on the date of grant.
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
49
|
(4)
|
|
The amounts in this column do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officers nor do they reflect the actual value that will be recognized by the named executive officers. Instead, the amounts reflect the grant date fair value for grants made by us in fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For information regarding assumptions made in calculating the amounts reflected in this column for grants made in fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, please refer to Note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 2, 2017.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The amounts in this column reflect amounts earned pursuant to our annual performance bonus program for our named executive officers. For more information, please see the section entitled “
Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Fiscal Year
2017
Executive Compensation — Annual Performance Bonus Program
”
on
page
37
of this proxy statement
.
|
|
(6)
|
|
See the
Fiscal Year
2017
All Other Compensation
table below for a breakdown of the compensation included in the “All Other Compensation” column for fiscal year
2017
.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Mr. Jilla was appointed our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective
July
20, 2015.
|
Fiscal Year
2017
All Ot
her Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Auto
Allowance
($)
|
401(k)
Match
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Erik Gershwind
|
12,000
|
7,442
|
19,442
|
Rustom Jilla
|
13,200
|
7,756
|
20,956
|
Douglas Jones
|
5,204
|
7,992
|
13,196
|
Steve Armstrong
|
12,000
|
8,366
|
20,366
|
Kari Heerdt
|
11,290
|
8,090
|
19,380
|
50
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Fiscal Year
2017
Gr
ants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table shows the stock option and restricted stock units granted to our named executive officers in fiscal year
2017
and the estimated possible payouts under the performance bonus awards granted to our named executive officers in respect of fiscal year
2017
performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Grant
Date
|
Threshold
($)
|
Target
($)
|
Maximum
($)
|
All Other
Stock Awards:
Number of
Shares of Stock
or Units
(#)
(2)
|
All Other
Option Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
(3)
|
Exercise
or Base
of Option
Awards
($/Sh)
(4)
|
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
($)
(5)
|
Erik Gershwind
|
n/a
|
562,500
|
1,500,000
|
2,400,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
10/26/2016
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
11,566
|
—
|
—
|
825,003
|
|
10/26/2016
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
72,659
|
71.33
|
675,002
|
Rustom Jilla
|
n/a
|
132,281
|
352,749
|
564,399
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
10/26/2016
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
6,215
|
—
|
—
|
443,316
|
|
10/26/2016
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
39,042
|
71.33
|
362,700
|
Douglas Jones
|
n/a
|
82,517
|
220,046
|
352,073
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
10/26/2016
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4,750
|
—
|
|
338,818
|
|
10/26/2016
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
29,839
|
71.33
|
277,204
|
Steve Armstrong
|
n/a
|
66,010
|
176,027
|
281,644
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
10/26/2016
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
3,397
|
—
|
—
|
242,308
|
|
10/26/2016
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
21,337
|
71.33
|
198,221
|
Kari Heerdt
|
n/a
|
64,649
|
172,396
|
275,834
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
10/26/2016
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
3,096
|
—
|
—
|
220,838
|
|
10/26/2016
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
19,448
|
71.33
|
180,672
|
_____________________________
|
(1)
|
|
These columns reflect the potential threshold, target and maximum annual performance bonuses payable to such named executive officer under our 201
7
annual performance bonus program. Amounts actually earned in fiscal year
2017
are reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table. Under our 201
7
annual performance bonus program, bonus awards for
2017
were based on achievement of
two
company financial metrics, each weighted
37.5
%, and the remaining 25% was based on the achievement of individual goals and objectives (G&Os). In addition, award opportunities were subject to an individual performance multiplier ranging from 0% to 125%. For additional information, please see the section entitled “
Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Fiscal Year
2017
Executive Compensation — Annual Performance Bonus Program
” on page
37
of this proxy statement. Annual performance bonus awards for the named executive officers were made under our shareholder-approved 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan in order to qualify as deductible performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Awards under the plan were made at levels of 1% of EBIT for our Chief Executive Offic
er and 0.6% of EBIT for other executive officers, subject to our Compensation Committee’s exercise of discretion to reduce the actual payouts. Consistent with our Compensation Committee’s policy, our Compensation Committee exercised its discretion to reduce the payouts under the awards so that actual payouts were equal to the payouts determined under our 201
7
annual performance bonus program.
|
|
(2)
|
|
These amounts represent restricted stock units granted in fiscal year
2017
pursuant to our 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan. These awards vest 20% on each of the first through fifth anniversaries of the grant date (with limited exceptions for termination of employment due to death, disability, retirement and change in control). The restricted stock units granted to our named executive officers have no performance criteria. For additional information, please see the section entitled “
Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Fiscal Year
2017
Executive Compensation —
Long-Term Stock-Based Compensation
” on page
41
of this proxy statement.
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
51
|
(3)
|
|
This column reflects stock option awards granted in fiscal year
2017
pursuant to our 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The stock options granted to our named executive officers in fiscal year
2017
have a seven-year term and fully vest over four years, with 25% of the stock options vesting on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant (with limited exceptions for termination of employment due to death, disability, retirement and change in control). The stock options granted to our named executive officers have no performance criteria. For additional information, please see the section entitled “
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
—
Fiscal Year
2017
Executive Compensation
—
Long-Term Stock-Based Compensation
” on page
41
of this proxy statement.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Awards were issued with an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the grant date, which we determined based on the closing price of a share of our Class A common stock as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of the grant.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The amounts in this column do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officers nor do they reflect the actual value that will be recognized by the named executive officers. Instead, the amounts represent the full grant date fair value of awards as calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value is the amount that we will expense in our financial statements over the award’s vesting schedule. For restricted stock units, fair value is the closing price of a share of our Class A common stock as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of the grant. The closing price of a share of our Class A common stock as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange on October 26, 2016 was $71.33. The fair values shown for stock options are accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, please refer to Note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 2, 2017.
|
Dividends are not paid on unvested restricted stock units; instead, dividend equivalent units accrue on unvested restricted stock units and vest at the same times as the underlying restricted stock units. The quarterly dividend rate was $
0.45
per share during fiscal year
2017
.
52
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Outstanding Eq
uity Awards at 201
7
Fiscal Year-End
Table
The following table shows the amount of outstanding stock option, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards previously granted and held by the named executive officers as of
September 2, 2017.
The market value of the stock awards is based on the closing price of a share of our Class A common stock as of
September 1
,
2017
, the last business day of
fiscal year 2017
, which was $
69.16
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
|
Erik Gershwind
|
34,044
|
11
,349
(1)
|
81.76
|
10/22/2020
|
—
|
—
|
|
22,972
|
22,973
(2)
|
83.03
|
10/21/2021
|
—
|
—
|
|
21,014
|
63,045
(3)
|
58.90
|
10/18/2022
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
72,659
(4)
|
71.33
|
10/25/2023
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
972
(5)
|
67,224
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
3,058
(6)
|
211,491
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
5,720
(7)
|
395,595
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
11,737
(8)
|
811,723
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
11,809
(9)
|
816,712
|
Rustom Jilla
|
5,000
|
29,421
(3)
|
58.90
|
10/18/2022
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
39,042
(4)
|
71.33
|
10/25/2023
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4,262
(10)
|
294,760
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
5,477
(8)
|
378,804
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
6,346
(9)
|
438,861
|
Douglas Jones
|
22,860
|
—
|
69.46
|
10/23/2019
|
—
|
—
|
|
17,523
|
5,841
(1)
|
81.76
|
10/22/2020
|
—
|
—
|
|
11,201
|
11,202
(2)
|
83.03
|
10/21/2021
|
—
|
—
|
|
7,705
|
23,116
(3)
|
58.90
|
10/18/2022
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
29,839
(4)
|
71.33
|
10/25/2023
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
720
(5)
|
49,795
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1,223
(6)
|
84,583
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2,167
(7)
|
149,870
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4,303
(8)
|
297,595
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4,850
(9)
|
335,413
|
Steve Armstrong
|
1,681
|
—
|
66.69
|
10/20/2018
|
—
|
—
|
|
15,441
|
—
|
69.46
|
10/23/2019
|
—
|
—
|
|
11,835
|
3,946
(1)
|
81.76
|
10/22/2020
|
—
|
—
|
|
8,407
|
8,407
(2)
|
83.03
|
10/21/2021
|
—
|
—
|
|
5,646
|
16,938
(3)
|
58.90
|
10/18/2022
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
21,337
(4)
|
71.33
|
10/25/2023
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
600
(5)
|
41,496
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1,018
(6)
|
70,405
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2,005
(7)
|
138,666
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
3,154
(8)
|
218,126
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
3,468
(9)
|
239,873
|
Kari Heerdt
|
7,112
|
7,112
(2)
|
83.03
|
10/21/2021
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
14,710
(3)
|
58.90
|
10/18/2022
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
19,448
(4)
|
71.33
|
10/25/2023
|
—
|
—
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1,217
(11)
|
84,168
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1,806
(7)
|
124,903
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2,739
(8)
|
189,438
|
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
3,161
(9)
)
|
218,618
|
|
(1)
|
|
These stock options became exercisable on
October 23, 2017.
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
53
|
(2)
|
|
One-half of these stock options became exercisable on
October
2
2, 2017
and an additional one-half of these stock options will become exercisable on
October
2
2
, 201
8
.
|
|
(3)
|
|
One-third of these stock options became exercisable on
October 19
, 2017. An additional one-third of these stock options will become exercisable on each of
October 19
, 201
8
and
October 19, 2019
.
|
|
(4)
|
|
One
-quarter of these stock options b
e
came exercisable on
October
26, 2017. An additional one-quarter of these stock options will become exercisable on each of
October
26, 2018,
October
26, 2019, and
October
26, 2020.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The restrictions on these shares lapsed on
October 24, 2017
.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The restrictions on one-half of these shares lapsed on
October
2
3
, 201
7
and the restrictions on an additional one-half of these shares will lapse on
October
2
3
, 201
8
.
|
|
(7)
|
|
The restrictions on one-half of t
hese shares lapsed on October 22, 2017
. The restrictions on an additional one-quarter of these shares will lapse on each of
October
2
2
, 201
8
and
October
2
2
, 201
9
.
|
|
(8)
|
|
This number includes dividend equivalent units accrued through
September
2, 2017.
40% of these RSUs vested on October 19, 2017. An additional 20% of these RSUs will vest on each of October 19, 2018, October 19, 2019, and October 19, 2020.
|
|
(9)
|
|
This number includes dividend equivalent units accrued through
September
2, 2017. 20% of these RSUs vested on
October
26, 2017. An additional 20% of these RSUs will vest on each of
October
26, 2018,
October
26, 2019,
October
26, 2020 and
October
26, 2021.
|
|
(10)
|
|
The
restrictions on
one-third
of these shares will lapse on each of
July
20, 2018,
July
20, 2019 and
July
20, 2020.
|
|
(11)
|
|
The restrictions on one-half of these shares lapsed on October 20, 2017. The restrictions on an additional one-quarter of these shares will lapse on each of October 20, 2018 and October 20, 2019.
|
54
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Fiscal Year
2017
O
ption Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table shows (i) the number of shares of our Class A common stock acquired upon the exercise of stock options by the named executive officers in fiscal year
2017,
(ii) the number of shares of restricted stock and/or the number of restricted stock units held by the named executive officers which vested in fiscal year
2017
, and (iii) the value realized upon the exercise of such stock options and the vesting of such shares or units, in each case before payment of any applicable withholding tax and broker commissions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
|
Value Realized on
Exercise
($)
(1)
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
(2)
|
Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
(3)
|
Erik Gershwind
|
58,110
|
160,704
|
7,877
|
562,241
|
Rustom Jilla
|
4,806
|
198,307
|
2,760
|
196,468
|
Douglas Jones
|
19,807
|
748,903
|
3,746
|
267,664
|
Steve Armstrong
|
28,069
|
1,117,811
|
2,857
|
204,102
|
Kari Heerdt
|
4,903
|
223,381
|
669
|
47,526
|
_____________________________
|
(1)
|
|
The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate dollar amount realized upon exercise of the options determined by the difference between the market price of the underlying securities at exercise and the exercise price of the options.
|
|
(2)
|
|
This number includes dividend equivalent units that vested at the same time as the underlying restricted stock units.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate dollar amount realized upon the vesting of stock determined by multiplying the number of shares of stock by the market value of the underlying shares on the vesting date.
|
Pens
ion Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Our named executive officers do not receive any compensation in the form of pension benefits or nonqualified deferred compensation.
Potential Paym
ents Upon Termination or Change in Control
Cha
nge in Control Agreements
Each of our current named executive officers has a written agreement that provides for payment to that named executive upon a qualifying termination following a change in control of the company. The terms of these agreements are outlined below. In addition to these agreements, each of our current named executive officers executed a confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-competition agreement under which each of them agreed not to use or disclose any confidential information relating to the company during his
or her
employment and after termination. Each of them also agreed not to compete with the company or to solicit any employees of the company during his or her employment and for two years following termination of his or her employment. All payments under the change in control arrangements are contingent on them complying with the foregoing obligations.
Under the terms of these agreements, “cause” is generally defined to include (i) the willful and continued failure by the executive to substantially perform his
or her
duties (other than any such failure resulting from his
or her
incapacity due to physical or mental illness) after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to the executive by the company, (ii) the willful engaging by the executive in conduct which is demonstrably and materially injurious to the company, monetarily or otherwise, or (iii) the executive’s conviction of, or entering a plea of nolo contendere to, a felony. A change in the executive’s “circumstances of employment” will generally be deemed to have occurred if there is (a) a material reduction or change in the executive’s employment duties or reporting responsibilities, (b) a reduction in the executive’s annual base salary, (c) a material diminution in the executive’s status, working conditions or other economic benefits, or (d) the company requiring the
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
55
executive to be based at any place outside a 30-mile radius from the company’s offices where the executive was based prior to a change in control.
In addition, a change in control of the company will generally be deemed to have occurred under these agreements if (i) a person or entity, other than members of the Jacobson or Gershwind families, acquires beneficial ownership of 50% or more of the combined voting power of the company’s voting securities, (ii) there is a change in the Board as a result of which the Board members cease to constitute a majority of the Board, (iii) there is a consummation of a merger or consolidation, other than a merger or consolidation that results in our shareholders holding more than 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the surviving entity, (iv) there is a liquidation or dissolution approved by our shareholders, or (v) there is a consummation of a sale of all or substantially all of the company’s assets.
Each of Messrs. Gershwind, Jilla, Jones and Armstrong and Ms. Heerdt has a change in control agreement with the company. Messrs. Gershwind’s, Jones’ and Armstrong’s agreements were amended and restated in
December 201
4, and each has a term of three years. Mr. Jilla’s and Ms. Heerdt’s agreements were entered into in
September 201
5 and
December 201
4, respectively, and each has a term of three years. The term of each agreement automatically renews for successive three-year terms unless terminated by us, in our sole discretion, upon notification to the executive at least 18 months prior to the end of the then current term.
Each agreement provides that if, within two years after the occurrence of a change in control of the company, (a) we terminate the executive’s employment other than for cause or (b) the executive terminates his or her employment following a change in the executive’s “circumstances of employment,” then we will be obligated to pay the executive a severance payment equal to (i) two times the executive’s annual base salary, plus (ii) two times the executive’s targeted annual cash incentive bonus, plus (iii) the pro rata portion of the executive’s targeted annual cash performance bonus. In addition, any unvested stock options and stock awards would accelerate. As a condition to receiving his or her severance payments and benefits, the executive would be required to execute a general release in favor of the company.
In addition, if the executive’s employment is terminated after the occurrence of a change in control as described above, we are obligated to provide the executive with outplacement services for up to six months and healthcare coverage, if elected by the executive, for up to 18 months, and the executive is entitled to receive, at our expense, an automobile allowance for the lesser of two years or the remainder of the automobile lease in effect following the termination of his
or her
employment.
Under the change in control agreements, the amount of severance benefits for these executives would be subject to reduction to the extent that the after-tax payments would be increased as a result of the payments being classified as “excess parachute payments” under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
.
Equ
ity Award Plans
The number of outstanding equity awards held by each named executive officer under our Omnibus Incentive Plans as of
September 2, 2017
is listed above in the
Outstanding Equity Awards at 201
7
Fiscal Year-End
table. All unvested equity awards at the end of fiscal year
2017
were granted to the named executive officers under our 2005 and 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plans, which provides certain benefits to plan participants in the event of the termination of such participant’s employment or a change in control of the company. The terms of these benefits are described below.
In connection with their long-term incentive awards, the named executive officers are required to sign an agreement containing confidentiality and non-competition provisions designed to protect the company’s confidential and proprietary information and to preserve the company’s competitive advantages.
Omnibus Incentive Plan
s
Each of our 2005 and 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plans is a “double trigger” plan, meaning that unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock unit and restricted stock awards vest if there is a change in
56
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
control of the company
only if
both
(i)
a change in control occurs and
(ii)
such options or awards are not continued, assumed or substituted in connection with the transaction or if there is a termination of employment without cause or by the executive for good reason within two years following the change in control. A change in control of the company will be deemed to have occurred for purposes of our Omnibus Incentive Plans in the same circumstances as described above under the section entitled “
– Change in Control Agreements
.”
Under our Omnibus Incentive Plans and awards thereunder, in the event that the employment of a named executive officer is terminated by reason of death, disability or retirement, all unvested stock options held by the named executive officer become immediately exercisable until the first anniversary of such termination or until the stock options expire by their terms, whichever is shorter, and the restrictions on outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units shall lapse and the shares shall become fully vested. An associate will be deemed to have retired if his or her employment is terminated without cause, death or disability, on or after age 65, provided the associate has a total of five years of service with the company.
Exe
cutive Severance Plan
On
October
27, 2016, our Board adopted, upon the recommendation of our Compensation Committee, the MSC Executive Severance Plan. Under the MSC Executive Severance Plan, Vice Presidents, Senior Vice Presidents and Executive Vice Presidents of the company are eligible to receive certain severance benefits in the event of a qualifying termination. For purposes of the MSC Executive Severance Plan, a “qualifying termination” means the occurrence of any of (i) the involuntary termination of a participant’s employment by the company as a result of the elimination of such participant’s job or position with the company because of reorganization, job elimination, or site closure, (ii) the termination of a participant’s employment with the company upon the participant’s failure to accept a material change in the geographic location where such participant is required to primarily perform his or her services for the company, such that the distance between the previous geographic location and the new geographic location exceeds 50 miles (one way); or (iii) the termination of a participant’s employment with the company upon the participant’s failure to accept a reduction in such participant’s base salary of 20 percent or more.
Severance benefits consist of a severance allowance, a benefits credit payment, a vesting acceleration benefit and, at the discretion of the plan administrator, outplacement services. The severance allowance generally will be (i) 18 months of base pay for executive vice presidents, (ii) 15 months of base pay for senior vice presidents and (iii) 12 months of base pay for vice presidents, plus in each case a pro rata bonus (based on the average bonus paid for the prior three fiscal years). The benefits credit will be an amount equal to the credit provided by the company toward the cost of the participant’s coverage under our healthcare exchange for 18 months in the case of executive vice presidents, 15 months in the case of Senior Vice Presidents and 12 months in the case of Vice Presidents. The vesting acceleration benefit will be the acceleration of equity awards that otherwise would have vested on the next scheduled vesting date after a participant’s termination date. Finally, the plan administrator may, in its discretion, provide outplacement services for such duration as the plan administrator may determine.
As a condition of receiving any severance benefit under the MSC Executive Severance Plan, a participant will be required to execute and not revoke a severance and release agreement in favor of the company in such form and of such content as the plan administrator, in its sole discretion, may require.
Under the MSC Executive Severance Plan, no participant will be entitled to receive severance benefits in the event that the plan administrator determines, in its sole discretion, among other things, that at the time of the participant’s qualifying termination, we had cause to terminate the participant due to failure to meet our established performance criteria, the participant’s misconduct, or the participant’s violation of any applicable company policy. In addition, if a participant incurs a qualifying termination, and the plan administrator determines, in its sole discretion, that thereafter (i) the participant breached any provision(s) of his or her severance and release agreement, or (ii) the participant breached any
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
57
provision(s) of any confidentiality, non-compete, non-solicitation, non-disparagement or other restrictive covenant or similar agreement with the company, any unpaid or unused severance benefits will be immediately forfeited, and the participant will be required to repay to us severance allowance amounts previously paid to such participant.
Pot
ential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Table
as of
September 1
,
2
017
The following table sets forth the estimated amounts that would be payable to each of our named executive officers upon the termination of his or her employment under certain circumstances or upon a change in control in limited circumstances, assuming that the termination of employment or change in control had occurred on
September 1
,
2017
(which was the last business day of fiscal year
2017
) and based on the price per share of our Class A common stock on that date, which was $
69.16
. The actual amounts payable can only be calculated at the time of the event. None of the named executive officers would have been eligible for retirement under the terms of our equity grant agreements as of
September 1, 2017
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Benefits
|
Change In
Control and
Termination
of Award
($)
(1)
|
Change in
Control and
Termination of
Employment
($)
(2)
(3)
|
Death,
Disability or
Retirement
($)
(4)
|
Termination
Under MSC
Executive
Severance Plan
($)
(5)
|
Erik Gershwind
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
—
|
4,453,768
|
—
|
—
|
Auto Allowance
|
—
|
24,000
|
—
|
—
|
Outplacement Services
|
—
|
30,000
|
—
|
—
|
Medical Benefits
|
—
|
37,199
|
—
|
—
|
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options
|
646,842
|
646,842
|
646,842
|
—
|
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock/RSUs
|
2,302,745
|
2,302,745
|
2,302,745
|
—
|
Total
|
2,949,587
|
7,494,554
|
2,949,587
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rustom Jilla
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
—
|
1,713,353
|
—
|
755,891
|
Auto Allowance
|
—
|
26,400
|
—
|
—
|
Outplacement Services
|
—
|
30,000
|
—
|
—
|
Medical Benefits
|
—
|
30,996
|
—
|
30,995
|
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options
|
301,859
|
301,859
|
301,859
|
98,568
|
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock/RSUs
|
1,112,425
|
1,112,425
|
1,112,425
|
280,731
|
Total
|
1,414,284
|
3,215,033
|
1,414,284
|
1,166,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas Jones
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
—
|
1,240,258
|
—
|
600,125
|
Auto Allowance
|
—
|
10,409
|
—
|
—
|
Outplacement Services
|
—
|
30,000
|
—
|
—
|
Medical Benefits
|
—
|
25,398
|
—
|
25,398
|
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options
|
237,170
|
237,170
|
237,170
|
79,053
|
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock/RSUs
|
917,256
|
917,256
|
917,256
|
308,434
|
Total
|
1,154,426
|
2,460,491
|
1,154,426
|
1,013,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Armstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
—
|
1,152,179
|
—
|
500,078
|
Auto Allowance
|
—
|
24,000
|
—
|
—
|
Outplacement Services
|
—
|
30,000
|
—
|
—
|
Medical Benefits
|
—
|
39,694
|
—
|
33,079
|
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options
|
173,784
|
173,784
|
173,784
|
57,928
|
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock/RSUs
|
708,566
|
708,566
|
708,566
|
248,372
|
Total
|
882,350
|
2,128,223
|
882,350
|
839,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Name and Benefits
|
Change In
Control and
Termination
of Award
($)
(1)
|
Change in
Control and
Termination of
Employment
($)
(2)
(3)
|
Death,
Disability or
Retirement
($)
(4)
|
Termination
Under MSC
Executive
Severance Plan
($)
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kari Heerdt
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
—
|
1,034,377
|
—
|
430,991
|
Auto Allowance
|
—
|
22,579
|
—
|
—
|
Outplacement Services
|
—
|
30,000
|
—
|
—
|
Medical Benefits
|
—
|
17,261
|
—
|
14,384
|
Accelerated Vesting of Stock Options
|
150,925
|
150,925
|
150,925
|
50,305
|
Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock/RSUs
|
617,128
|
617,128
|
617,128
|
195,516
|
Total
|
768,053
|
1,872,270
|
768,053
|
691,196
|
______
_______________________
|
(1)
|
|
Unvested stock options and unvested stock awards will vest if there is a change in control of the company
only if
such options or awards are not continued, assumed or substituted in connection with the transaction or if there is a termination of employment without cause or by the executive for good reason within two years following the change in control. The estimated values of the accelerated stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards listed in this column for each of the named executive officers are based on the closing price of a share of our Class A common stock as reported on
the New Yo
rk Stock Exchange on September 1
,
2017
, which was $
69.16
.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Each of the named executive officers executed a confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-competition agreement under which each executive agreed not to use or disclose any confidential information relating to the company during the executive’s employment and after termination. Each executive also agreed not to compete with the company or to solicit any employees of the company during his or her employment and for two years following termination of his or her employment. All payments under the change in control arrangements are contingent on the executives complying with the foregoing obligations and executing a general release in favor of the company.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The severance amounts in this column reflect estimated amounts payable upon the occurrence of (i) a change in control of the company and (ii) the termination of employment of the named executive officers within two years following such change in control, (a) by the company, without cause or (b) by the executive for good reason. The estimated severance amount listed in this column for each of the named executive officers was calculated using the named executive officer’s base salary that
was in effect as of September 1
, 201
7
. The estimated values of the accelerated stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards listed in this column for each of the named executive officers are based on the closing price of a share of our Class A common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange
on September 1
,
2017
, which was $
69.16
.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The amounts in this column reflect estimated amounts payable upon the death, disability or retirement of a named executive officer under the terms of our Omnibus Incentive Plans and awards thereunder. None of our named executive officers are currently eligible for retirement. The estimated values of the accelerated stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards listed in this column are based on the closing price of a share of our Class A common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange
on September 1
,
2017
, which was $
69.16
.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The amounts in this column reflect estimated amounts that would be payable under the MSC Executive Severance Plan, which was adopted on
October
27, 2016, in the event of a “qualifying termination
,
”
(
i) assuming that the qualifying termina
tion had occurred on September 1
,
2017 and (
ii) based on the price per share of our Class A common stock
on September 1
,
2017
, which was $
69.16
. Mr. Gershwind is not a participant in the MSC Executive Severance Plan. The estimated severance amount listed in this column for each of the named executive officers (other than Mr. Gershwind) was calculated using the named executive officer’s base salary that
was in effect as of September 1
,
2017
. Severance amounts and medical benefits would be payable in equal installments in accordance with the company’s normal payroll practices over the applicable period of either 15 or 18 months.
As described above under the section entitled “Potential Payments
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
59
Upon Termination or Change in Control — Executive Severance Plan,” the accelerated stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards listed in this column consist of awards that otherwise would have vested on the next scheduled vesting date after the named executive officer’s qualifying termination.
The estimated values of the accelerated stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards listed in this column are based on the closing price of a share of our Class A common stock as reported on the New Yo
rk Stock Exchange on September 1
,
2017
, which was $
69.16
.
As a condition of receiving any severance benefit under the MSC Executive Severance Plan, a participant will be required to execute and not revoke a severance and release agreement in favor of the company in such form and of such content as the plan administrator, in its sole discretion, may require. In addition, no participant will be entitled to receive severance benefits in the event that the plan administrator determines, in its sole discretion, among other things, that at the time of the participant’s qualifying termination, the company had cause to terminate the participant due to failure to meet company-established performance criteria, the participant’s misconduct, or the participant’s violation of any applicable company policy.
60
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Indemnif
ication Agreements; Directors and Officers Liability Insurance
On
January
25, 2016, we entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. The indemnification agreements clarify and enhance the rights and obligations of the company and the indemnitee with respect to indemnification and advancement of expenses already provided for in our Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated By-laws. The indemnification agreements provide that we will indemnify the indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by New York law against all indemnifiable losses relating to, resulting from or arising out of any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, or any inquiry or investigation that the indemnitee in good faith believes might lead to the institution of any such action, suit or proceeding. The indemnification agreements also provide for the advancement of expenses. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with certain of our officers who serve as members of the Administrative Committee of our 401(k) plan. These indemnification agreements provide such officers with indemnification to the maximum extent permitted by law in connection with any actions or omissions such officers take or fail to take in their capacity as members of the Administrative Committee.
On
May
12, 2017, we renewed our policies for directors and officers liability insurance. The policies are issued by Illinois National Insurance Company,
Travelers Casualt
y and Surety Company of America
,
QBE Insurance Corporation
,
ACE American Insurance Company and XL Specialty Insurance Company. The policies expire on
May
12, 2018, and the total annua
l premium is approximately $368,000
. On
May
12, 2017, we also renewed our fiduciary liability insurance policy, which covers directors and associates who serve as fiduciaries for our employee benefit plans. The policy is issued by Illinois National Insurance Company, expires on
May
12, 2018, and the ann
ual premium is approximately $16
,
000.
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
61
A
PPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (PROPOSAL NO. 3)
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires that we provide our shareholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of
our named executive officers
as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.
As described in greater detail
in the section entitled “
Compensation Discussion and Analysis,
”
our key compensation goals are to: create a performance driven culture based on personal accountability by linking rewards to company and individual performance; provide a market competitive compensation opportunity to enable the company to attract, retain and motivate highly talented associates; and
recruit, retain and motivate highly talented executives, align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders and provide performance-based compensation that appropriately rewards our executives. Our compensation programs include a number of key features designed to accomplish these objectives.
Our Board urges our shareholders to read
the section entitled “
Compensation Discussion and Analysis,
”
which describes in detail how our executive compensation practices operate and are designed to achieve our key compensation goals, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and narrative discussion appearing under
“
Executive Compensation,
”
which provide detailed information about the compensation of our named executive officers.
Based on company and individual performance, the Compensation Committee believes that compensation levels for fiscal year
2017
were appropriate and consistent with the philosophy and objectives of the company’s compensation programs.
This vote is advisory, which means that this vote on executive compensation is not binding on the company,
our Board
or
our Compensation Committee
. The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation, but rather relates to the overall compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. To the extent there is any significant vote against our named executive officers’ compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, our Compensation Committee will consider our shareholders’ concerns and evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
The affirmative vote of a majority
of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting
is required to approve
, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement
.
Accordingly, we ask our shareholders to vote on the following resolution at our 201
8
annual meeting of shareholders:
“RESOLVED, that the Company’s shareholders
hereby
approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Compan
y’s Proxy Statement for the 2018
Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.”
A
s previously disclosed, we plan to hold the
“say on pay”
advisory vote on an annual basis. The next shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation
will occur at the company’s 2019
annual
meeting of
shareholders.
|
The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis,
of the compensation
of our named executive officers
as disclosed in this proxy statement.
|
62
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
A
DVIS
ORY
VOTE ON THE PREFERRED FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTEs ON THE COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (PROPOSAL NO. 4)
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act also requires that, at least every six years, we provide shareholders with the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, for their preference as to how frequently we should conduct future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. Our shareholders voted on a similar proposal in 2012, with the frequency of every one year receiving the greatest number of votes cast in person or by proxy at our 2012 annual meeting of shareholders.
Accordingly, we are asking our shareholders to cast an advisory vote on the preferred frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. Our shareholders may specify whether they prefer such votes to occur every one year, every two years, or every three years, or they may abstain. Based on our Board’s experience with prior advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers, our Board recommends that shareholders vote, on an advisory basis, for such votes to occur every one year.
In determining to recommend that shareholders vote for a
preferred
frequency of every one year, our Board considered that an annual advisory vote
on the compensation of our named executive officers
will allow our shareholders to provide us with their direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement every year.
This vote is advisory, which means that the vote is not binding on the company, our Board or our Compensation Committee. We recognize that the shareholders may have different views as to the best approach for the company, and therefore we look forward to hearing from our shareholders as to their preferences on the frequency of future advisory votes
on the compensation of our named executive officers
. Our Board and our Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote. However, when considering the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, our Board may decide that it is in the best interests of our shareholders and the company to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the frequency receiving the most votes cast by our shareholders.
The option (
every
one year, two years or three years) that receives the greatest number of votes cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting will be considered the frequency preferred by our shareholders.
The proxy card provides shareholders with the opportunity to choose among four options (holding the vote every one
year
, two
years
or three years, or abstain from voting) and, therefore, shareholders will not be voting to approve or disapprove the recommendation of our Board.
|
|
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, FOR EVERY “ONE YEAR” AS THE PREFERRED FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
63
EQ
UITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Information for our equity compensation plans in effect as of
September 2, 2017
is as
follows
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
|
|
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
|
Plan category
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders:
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Equity compensation plans
(excluding Associate Stock Purchase Plan)
|
1,743,066
|
|
$70.88
|
|
4,083,222
|
(1)
|
Associate Stock Purchase Plan
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
182,422
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved
by security holders:
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
1,743,066
|
|
$70.88
|
|
|
4,265,644
|
|
_____________________________
|
(1)
|
|
Represents
shares available for future issuance under our 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Such shares may become subject to stock option grants or stock appreciation rights or may be issued directly as stock awards with such terms and conditions, performance requirements, restrictions,
forfeiture
provisions, contingencies and other limitations as determined by the plan administrator.
|
64
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
DIR
ECTOR COMPENSATION
Our Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations with respect to the compensation of our non-executive directors. Our Compensation Committee’s policy is to engage
a compensation consultant every year to conduct a full review and benchmarking (using the same peer group used to benchmark executive compensation) of
our
non-executive directors’ compensation in order to ensure that our directors’ compensation is in line with peer companies competing for director talent. In fiscal year
2017
, our Compensation Committee engaged F.W. Cook as its compensation consultants.
The key objective of our non-executive directors’ compensation program is to attract and retain highly qualified directors with the necessary skills, experience and character to oversee our management. In addition, our compensation program is designed to align the interests of our Board with the long-term interests of our shareholders. The compensation program
is also designed to recognize the time commitment, expertise and potential liability required of active Board membership.
We compensate our non-executive directors with a mix of cash and equity-based compensation. Directors who are also executives of the company do not receive any compensation for their service on our Board.
Fiscal Year
2017
Co
mpensation
For the fiscal year ended
September
2, 2017
, we paid each non-executive director the following compensation:
|
·
|
|
a retainer per director for service on our Board of $50,000 per year;
|
|
·
|
|
a fee for attendance at a Board meeting of $2,000 per meeting;
|
|
·
|
|
a fee for attendance at a committee meeting of $1,700 per meeting;
|
|
·
|
|
an additional retainer for the chairman of the Audit Committee of $20,000 per year;
|
|
·
|
|
an additional retainer for the chairman of the Compensation Committee of $10,000 per year
, which increased to $12,500 per year effective immediately
following our 2017 annual meeting of shareholders
;
|
|
·
|
|
an additional retainer for the chairwoman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of $
10,000
per year
; and
|
|
·
|
|
an annual grant of restricted stock units representing shares having an aggregate fair market value of $115,000 on the date of grant to each director upon his or her election or reelection to our Board; 50% of these shares vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 50% vest on the second anniversary of the date of grant.
|
In the event that a director ceases to provide services to the company by virtue of his or her death, disability or retirement (which means cessation of services with approval of the Board), the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units will accelerate and the shares underlying the restricted stock units will become fully vested.
In addition, in the event of a change in control of the company, the vesting of all outstanding restricted stock units held by the director will accelerate, and all shares underlying restricted stock units will become fully vested. A change in control of the company for purposes of the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan is described above under the section entitled “
Executive Compensation – Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control –Change in Control Agreements.
”
In
October 201
4, our Compensation Committee recommended, and our Board approved, a change in the non-executive compensation for Mr. Jacobson. Due to the level of his stock ownership, Mr. Jacobson and the company would need to make a filing and he would need to pay a filing fee under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 in connection with the annual equity grant. Under these circumstances, our Board, upon the recommendation of our Compensation Committee, decided that it was appropriate to pay Mr. Jacobson $115,000 in lieu of the annual equity grant, such amount to be paid quarterly in arrears.
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
65
Director compensation is paid quarterly in arrears. The cash compensation of directors who serve less than a full quarter is pro-rated for the number of days actually served. Directors who are appointed between annual shareholder meetings receive a pro-rated equity award upon appointment to our Board. In addition, we reimburse our non-executive directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending in-person Board or Board committee meetings and for fees incurred in attending continuing education courses for directors that are approved in advance by the company.
In fiscal year 2017, F.W. Cook conducted a competitive analysis of our non-executive directors’ compensation using the same peer group used to benchmark executive compensation. Based on this analysis, F.W. Cook concluded that, on a normalized basis, the average total annual compensation per non-executive director (excluding our Non-Executive Chairman) in fiscal year 2017 approximated the median of the peer group.
Changes in Fiscal Year 2018
Compensation
No changes were made
to non-executive directors
’ compensation
for fiscal year 2018.
66
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Non-Execu
tive Director Summary Compensation in Fiscal Year
2017
The following table presents the compensation paid to our non-executive directors in respect of fiscal year
2017
for thei
r services as directors. Mr
. Gershwind, as
an executive officer
of the company, did not receive compensation for
his
services as
a director
of the company in fiscal year
2017
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Fees Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)
(1)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
(2)(3)
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
(4)
|
Total
($)
|
Jonathan Byrnes
(5)
|
84,700
|
115,018
|
—
|
199,718
|
Roger Fradin
(5)
|
86,400
|
115,018
|
—
|
201,418
|
Louise Goeser
(5)
|
87,300
|
115,018
|
—
|
202,318
|
Mitchell Jacobson
(5)
|
177,000
|
—
|
238,900
|
415,900
|
Michael Kaufmann
(5)
|
88,100
|
115,018
|
—
|
203,118
|
Denis Kelly
(5)
|
102,300
|
115,018
|
—
|
217,318
|
Steven Paladino
(5)
|
89,800
|
115,018
|
—
|
204,818
|
Philip Peller
(5)
|
104,700
|
115,018
|
—
|
219,718
|
_____________________________
|
(1)
|
|
Reflects annual cash Board and Board committee retainers, Board meeting fees, standing Board committee meeting fees and other Board committee meeting fees earned by our non-executive directors for services provided during fiscal year
2017
. Also includes Mr. Jacobson’s $115,000 cash payment in lieu of the annual equity grant.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The amounts in this column do not reflect compensation actually received by our non-executive directors nor do they reflect the actual value that will be recogni
zed by the non-executive directors. Instead, the amounts reflect the grant date fair value of restricted stock unit awards calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of restricted stock unit awards was calculated using the closing market price of our Class A common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant. Dividends are not paid on unvested restricted stock units. Dividend equivalent units accrue on unvested restricted stock units and vest at the same time as the underlying restricted stock units.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Ms. Goeser and Messrs. Byrnes, Fradin, Kaufmann, Kelly, Paladino and Peller each received a grant of 1,110 restricted stock units on
January
26, 2017 following our 2017 annual meeting of shareholders. One-half of these restricted stock units will vest on
January
26, 2018 and the remaining one-half of these restricted stock units will vest on
January
26, 2019.
|
|
(4)
|
|
As our Non-executive Chairman of the Board, Mr. Jacobson continues to participate in our 401(k) plan (which includes company matching contributions of 50% up to the first 6% of his contributions) and our group term life insurance program. In addition, we provide Mr. Jacobson with access to an employee of the company to serve as his personal administrative assistant. We incurred payroll and fringe benefit costs for Mr. Jacobson’s personal assistant in fiscal year 2017 of $144,511 and made $92,889 in tax gross-up payments to Mr. Jacobson to reimburse him for income taxes in respect of the fiscal year 2017 compensation attributed to him for the use of the personal administrative assistant. Mr. Jacobson received $1,500 in 401(k) matching funds from the company during fiscal year 2017.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The table below shows the aggregate number of unvested stock awards held by our non-executive directors as of
September
2
, 201
7, which number includes dividend equivalent units accrued on restricted stock units through that date.
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Stock Awards
(Number of Underlying Shares)
|
Jonathan Byrnes
|
2,137
|
Roger Fradin
|
2,137
|
Louise Goeser
|
2,137
|
Mitchell Jacobson
|
—
|
Michael Kaufmann
|
2,423
|
Denis Kelly
|
2,137
|
Steven Paladino
|
2,423
|
Philip Peller
|
2,137
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
67
CERT
AIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
Written Re
lated Person Transactions Policy
We have adopted a written related person transactions policy detailing the policies and procedures relating to transactions that may present actual, potential or perceived conflicts of interest and may raise questions as to whether such transactions are consistent with the best interest of the company and our shareholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must review and approve any related person transaction proposed to be entered into and
,
if appropriate, ratify any such transaction previously commenced and ongoing. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may delegate its authority under the policy to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, who may act alone. The Chairman will report to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee at the next meeting any approval made pursuant to such delegated authority. Based on its consideration of all of the relevant facts and circumstances, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will decide whether or not to approve any related person transaction.
Under our related person transactions policy, any relationship, arrangement or transaction between the company and (a) any director, executive officer or any immediate family member of either a director or an executive officer, (b) any beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Class A common stock or (c) any entity in which any of the foregoing is employed or is a partner, principal or owner of a 5% or more ownership interest, is deemed a related person transaction, subject to certain exceptions, including (i) transactions available to all associates generally, (ii) transactions involving less than $25,000 in any 12-month period when aggregated with all similar transactions during such period, (iii) transactions involving executive compensation approved by our Compensation Committee or director compensation approved by our Board and (iv) certain charitable contributions.
Related Pe
rson Transactions
Other than compensation agreements, including those described under the sections entitled “Executive Compensation” beginning on
page
49
of this proxy statement and “Director Compensation” beginning on
page
65
of this proxy statement, since the beginning of fiscal year 2017, there has not been, nor is there currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we have been or will be a participant:
|
·
|
|
in
which
the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and
|
|
·
|
|
in
which
any director, nominee, executive officer,
beneficial owner
of more than 5% of our Class A common stock or our Class B common stock or any member of their immediate family had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
|
68
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
SECU
RITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information set forth in the following tables is furnished as of
October
31,
2017
, except as otherwise noted, regarding the beneficial o
wnership of our Class A common stock and our Class B common stock by:
|
·
|
|
each
shareholder
known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Class A common stock or Class B common stock;
|
|
·
|
|
each
director
and n
ominee for director of the company;
|
|
·
|
|
each of our named executive officers; and
|
|
·
|
|
all
directors
and executive officers as a group.
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC that deem shares to be beneficially owned by any person who has or shares voting or investment power with respect to such shares. Shares of Class A common stock subject to options that are ex
ercisable as of October 31, 2017
or are exercisable within 60 days of
October 31, 2017
are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding such options for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of such person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of any other person. In addition, since all of the shares of Class B common stock are convertible at the option of the holder into Class A common stock on a share-for-share basis, the beneficial owner of shares of Class B common stock is deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same number of shares of Class A common stock. In indicating below the amount and nature of a person’s beneficial ownership of Class A common stock and the percentage of the class owned by such person, it has been assumed that such person has converted into Class A common stock all shares of Class B common stock of which such person is a beneficial owner. Furthermore, such shares of Class A common stock are deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of any other person.
In the tables below, percentage
ownership is based on 44,558,524 shares of our Class A common stock and 11,850,636
shares of our Class B common stock outstanding as of
October
31,
2017
. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons listed in the tables below have advised us that they have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed as owned by them.
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
69
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
Class B common stock
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Amount &
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
|
Percent
of Class
|
Amount &
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
|
Percent
of Class
|
Percent
Voting
Power
(1)
|
Mitchell Jacobson
(2)
|
7,365,693
|
(3)
|
14.3%
|
7,107,074
|
(4)
|
60.0%
|
43.7%
|
Marjorie Gershwind Fiverson
(5)
|
2,257,645
|
(6)
|
4.8%
|
2,083,004
|
(7)
|
17.6%
|
12.9%
|
Erik Gershwind
(2)
|
1,498,173
|
(8)
|
3.3%
|
1,206,192
|
(9)
|
10.2%
|
7.6%
|
Stacey Bennett
(5)
|
1,131,408
|
(10)
|
2.5%
|
946,566
|
(11)
|
8.0%
|
5.9%
|
Mitchell L. Jacobson 2005 GRAT #2 Trust
(5)
|
2,287,388
|
(12)
|
4.9%
|
2,179,559
|
(13)
|
18.4%
|
13.4%
|
JP Morgan Chase & Co. and its Subsidiaries
(14)
|
2,571,572
|
|
5.8%
|
—
|
|
—
|
1.6%
|
The Vanguard Group
(15)
|
4,485,891
|
|
10.1%
|
—
|
|
—
|
2.7%
|
BlackRock, Inc. and its Subsidiaries
(16)
|
3,559,367
|
|
7.5%
|
—
|
|
—
|
2.2%
|
_____________________________
|
(1)
|
|
Voting power represents the combined voting power of Class A common stock and Class B common stock owned beneficially by such person. On all matters to be voted upon at the annual meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof, the holders of the Class A common stock and the Class B common stock vote together as a single class, with each record holder of Class A common stock entitled to one vote per share of Class A common stock and each record holder of Class B common stock entitled to ten votes per share of Class B common stock. For the purpose of calculating the voting power of each beneficial owner, shares of Class A common stock subject to options that are exercisable as of
October
31, 2017 or are exercisable within 60 days of
October
31, 2017 are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding such options (but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of calculating the voting power of any other person) and shares of Class B common stock are included on a non-converted basis only.
|
|
(2)
|
|
This beneficial owner’s address is c/o MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc., 75 Maxess Road, Melville, New York 11747.
|
|
(3)
|
|
This number
includes (a) 150,790
shares of Class A common stock held by a family charitable foundation, of which Mr. Jacobson is a director, as to which shares Mr. Jacobson has shared voting and dispositive power (and which shares are also reported as beneficially owned by Ms. Bennett); (b) 1
07,829 shares of Class A common stock held by a trust, of which Mr. Jacobson is the settlor and Mr. Jacobson’s spouse is a co-trustee (and which shares are also reported as beneficially owned by the Mitchell L. Jacobson 2005 GRAT #2 Trust); and (c)
7,107,074
shares of Class B common stock, which are convertible into shares of our Class A common stock on a share-for-share basis at any time, and which are discussed in more detail in footnote 4 below. Mr. Jacobson disclaims beneficial ownership of
107,829
shares of Class A common stock, which are held by the trust, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest.
|
|
(4)
|
|
This number
includes (a) 2,378,131
shares
of Class B common stock owned directly by Mr. Jacobson; (b)
48,700
shares of Class B common stock held by a trust, of which Mr. Jacobson is the settlor and Mr. Jacobson’s spouse is a co-trustee; (c)
2,500,684
shares of Class B common stock held by grantor retaine
d annuity trusts, of which Mr. Jacobson is the settlor, sole annuitant and trustee
, and other trusts over whose portfolio securities Mr. Jacobson exercises voting and dispositive power
; and (d)
2,179,559
shares of Class B common stock held by a trust of which Mr. Jacobson is the settlor and his spouse is a co-trustee (and which shares are also reported as beneficially owned by the Mitchell L. Jacobson 2005 GRAT #2 Trust). Mr. Jacobson dis
claims beneficial ownership of 4,728,943
shares of Class B common stock, which are held by various trusts, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest.
|
|
(5)
|
|
This
beneficial owner’s address is c/o Jacobson Family Investments, Inc., 152 West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019.
|
70
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
|
(6)
|
|
This number includes (a
) 13,240 shares
of Class A common stock held by a family charitable foundation, of which Ms. Gershwind Fiverson is a director, as to which shares Ms. Gershwind Fiverson has shared voting and dispositive power (and which shares are also reported as beneficially owned by
Mr. Gershwind and Ms. Bennett);
and (b) 2,0
83,004 shares
of Class B common stock, which are convertible into shares of our Class A common stock on a share-for-share basis at any time, and which are discussed in more detail in footnote 7 below. Excludes
488,599
shares held by limited liability companies of which Ms. Gershwind Fiverson, together with Mr. Gershwind and Ms. Bennett, are members, and as to which shares Ms. Gershwind Fiverson disclaims beneficial ownership.
|
|
(7)
|
|
This number
includes (a) 544,858 shares of Class B common stock owned directly by Ms. Gershwind Fiverson; and (b)
1,538,146
shares of Class B common s
tock held by grantor retained annuity trusts of which Ms. Gershwind Fiverson is the settlor, sole annuitant
and trustee
, and other trusts over whose portfolio securities Ms. Gershwind Fiverson exercises voting and dispositive power
. Ms. Gershwind Fiverson disclaims beneficial ownership of
1,538,146
of the shares of Class B common stock, which are held by various trusts, except to the extent of her pecuniary interest.
|
|
(8)
|
|
This number includes (a) 140,044 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise by Mr. Gershwind of stock options that are exercisable as of October 31, 2017 or exercisable within 60 days of October 31, 2017; (b) 4,389 unvested restricted shares of Class A common stock over
which Mr. Gershwind has voting rights but which are subject to restrictions on transfer; (c) 34,052 shares of Class A common stock held by family charitable foundations, of which Mr. Gershwind is a director, as to which shares Mr. Gershwind has sole voting and dispositive power for 20,812 shares and shared voting and dispositive power for 13,240 shares (and which 13,240 shares are also reported as beneficially owned by Ms. Gershwind Fiverson and Ms. Bennett); and (d) 1,206,192 shares of Class B common stock, which are convertible into shares of our Class A common stock on a share-for-share basis at any time, and which are discussed in more detail in footnote 9 below. Excludes 488,599 shares held by limited liability companies of which Mr. Gershwind, together with Ms. Gershwind Fiverson and Ms. Bennett, are members, and as to which shares Mr. Gershwind disclaims beneficial ownership.
|
|
(9)
|
|
This number includes (
a)
777,759
shares of Class B common stock owned directly by Mr. Gershwind; (b)
236,519
shares of Class B common stock held b
y grantor retained annuity trusts of which Mr. Gershwind is the settlor
, sole annuitant and trustee;
(c)
170,778
shares of Class B common stock, which are held by a trust of which Mr. Gershwind is a co-trustee and beneficiary, as to which shares Mr. Gershwind has shared voting and dispositive power;
and (d
)
21,136
shares of Class B common stock, which are held by a trust of which Mr. Gershwind is a trustee.
Mr. Gershwind disclaims beneficial ownership of 428,433 shares of Class B common stock, which are held by various trusts, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest.
|
|
(10)
|
|
This number includes (a
) 184,842
shares of Class A common
stock held by family charitable foundations, of which Ms. Bennett is a director, as to which shares Ms. Bennett has
sole voting and dispositive power for 20,812 shares and
shared voting and dispositive power
for 164,030 shares
(and for which
150,790
shares are also reported as beneficially owned by Mr. Jacobson and
13,240
shares are also reported as beneficially owned by Ms. Gershwind Fiverson and Mr. Gershwind);
and (b)
946,566
shares of Class B common stock, which are convertible into shares of our Class A common stock on a share-for-share basis at any time, and which
are discussed in more detail in footnote 11 below. Excludes
488,599
shares held by limited liability companies of which Ms. Bennett, together with Ms. Gershwind Fiverson and Mr. Gershwind, are members, and as to which shares Ms. Bennett disclaims beneficial ownership.
|
|
(11)
|
|
This number includes (a)
518,133 shares
of Class B common stock owned directly by Ms. Bennett; (b)
236,519
shares of Class B common stock held by grantor retained annuity trusts of which Ms. Bennett is the settlor, sole annuitant and
trustee; (c) 170,778
shares of Class B common stock, which are held by a trust of which Ms. Bennett
is a co-trustee and beneficiary, as to which shares
Ms. Bennett
has shared voting and dispositive power
; and (d)
21,136
shares of Class B common stock, which are held by a trust of which Ms. Bennett is a trustee. Ms. Bennett disclaims beneficial ownership of
428,433
shares of Class B common stock, which are held by various trusts, except to the extent of her pecuniary interest.
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
71
|
(12)
|
|
This
number includes
2,179,559
shares
of Class B common stock, which are convertible into shares of our Class A common stock on a share-for-share basis at any time, and which are discussed in more detail in footnote 13 below.
|
|
(13)
|
|
This number includes
2,179,559
shares owned directly by the trust (which shares are also reported as beneficially owned by Mr. Jacobson).
|
|
(14)
|
|
Based on information supplied by JPMorgan Chase & Co. in an amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
January 19, 2017
. The address of JPMorgan Chase & Co. is 270 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is deemed to have sole voting power over
2,503,805
of these shares and
sole dispositive power over
2,571,572
of these shares.
|
|
(15)
|
|
Based on information supplied by The Vanguard Group in an amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
February 10, 2017
. The address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd
.
, Malvern, PA 19355. The Vanguard Group is deemed to have sole voting power over
26,461
of these shares, shared voting power over
4,800
of these shares, sole dispositive power over
4,457,030
of these shares and shared dispositive power over
28,861
of these shares.
|
|
(16)
|
|
Based on information supplied by BlackRock, Inc. in an amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
January 25
, 201
7
. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. BlackRock, Inc. is deemed to have sole voting power over
3,383,560
of these shares and sole dispositive power over
3,559,367
of these shares.
|
72
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
Sec
urity Ownership of Management
The address of each individual named below is as follows: c/o MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc., 75 Maxess Road, Melville, New York 11747. All fractional shares reported in the table below have been rounded to the nearest whole share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
Class B common stock
|
|
Name
|
Amount &
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
|
Percent
of Class
|
Amount &
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
|
Percent
of Class
|
Percent
Voting
Power
(1)
|
Mitchell Jacobson
|
7,365,693
|
(2)
|
14.3%
|
7,107,074
|
(3)
|
60.0%
|
43.7%
|
Erik Gershwind
|
1,498,173
|
(4)
|
3.3%
|
1,206,192
|
(5)
|
10.2%
|
7.6%
|
Jonathan Byrnes
|
9,973
|
|
*
|
—
|
|
—
|
*
|
Roger Fradin
|
34,187
|
|
*
|
—
|
|
—
|
*
|
Louise Goeser
|
12,187
|
|
*
|
—
|
|
—
|
*
|
Michael Kaufmann
|
1,569
|
(6)
|
*
|
—
|
|
—
|
*
|
Denis Kelly
|
10,900
|
(7)
|
*
|
—
|
|
—
|
*
|
Steven Paladino
|
1,569
|
(8)
|
*
|
—
|
|
—
|
*
|
Philip Peller
|
11,780
|
(9)
|
*
|
—
|
|
—
|
*
|
Rustom Jilla
|
38,105
|
(10)
|
*
|
—
|
|
—
|
*
|
Douglas Jones
|
96,379
|
(11)
|
*
|
—
|
|
—
|
*
|
Steve Armstrong
|
73,890
|
(12)
|
*
|
—
|
|
—
|
*
|
Kari Heerdt
|
26,349
|
(13)
|
*
|
—
|
|
—
|
*
|
All directors, nominees for director and
executive officers as a group (18 persons)
|
9,390,271
|
(14)
|
17.6%
|
8,313,266
|
(15)
|
70.2%
|
51.5%
|
_____________________________
*
L
ess than 1%
|
(1)
|
|
Voting power represents the combined voting power of Class A common stock and Class B common stock owned beneficially by such person. On all matters to be voted upon at the annual meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof, the holders of the Class A common stock and the Class B common stock vote t
ogether as a single class, with each record holder of Class A common stock entitled to one vote per share of Class A common stock and each record holder of Class B common stock entitled to ten votes per share of Class B common stock. For the purpose of calculating the voting power of each beneficial owner, shares of Class A common stock subject to options that are exercisable as of
October 31, 2017
or are exercisable within 60 days of
October 31, 2017
are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding such options (but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of calculating the voting power of any other person) and shares of Class B common stock are included on a non-converted basis only.
|
|
(2)
|
|
See footnote 3 to the Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners table, located on
page
70
of this proxy statement.
|
|
(3)
|
|
See footnote 4 to the Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners table, located on
page
70
of this proxy statement.
|
|
(4)
|
|
See footnote 8 to the Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners table, located on
page
71
of this proxy statement.
|
|
(5)
|
|
See footnote 9 to the Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners table, located on
page
71
of this proxy statement.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Includes
286
unvested restricted shares of Class A common stock over which Mr. Kaufmann has voting rights but which are subject to restrictions on transfer.
|
|
(7)
|
|
I
ncludes
500
shares held in a joint account over which Mr. Kelly’s wife has shared voting and investment power.
|
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
73
|
(8)
|
|
Includes
286
unvested restricted shares of Class A common stock over which Mr. Paladino has voting rights but which are subject to restrictions on transfer.
|
|
(9)
|
|
I
ncludes
9,358
shares held by an irrevocable trust, of which Mr. Peller is the settlor, Mr. Peller’s daughter is the sole trustee, and Mr. Peller’s wife is the beneficiary.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Includes 24,567 shares of
Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise by Mr. Jilla of stock options that are exercisable as of
October 31, 2017
or exercisable within 60 days of
October 31, 2017
. Includes
4,262
unvested restricted shares of Class A common stock over which Mr. Jilla has voting rights but which are subject to restrictions on transfer. Also includes
1,000
shares held in a joint account over which Mr. Jilla’s wife has shared voting and investment power.
Also includes 49 shares of Class A common stock purchased but not yet issued as of October 31, 2017 pursuant to our Associate Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
(11)
|
|
Includes 85,895 shares
of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise by Mr. Jones of stock options that are exercisable as of
October 31, 2017
or exercisable within 60 days of
October 31, 2017
. Also includes
4,110
unvested restricted shares of Class A common stock over which Mr. Jones has voting rights but which are subject to restrictions on transfer.
|
|
(12)
|
|
Includes
62,139 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise by Mr. Armstrong of stock options that are exercisable as of
October
31, 2017
or exercisable within 60 days of
October 31, 2017
. Also includes
3,623
unvested restricted shares of Class A common stock over which Mr. Armstrong has voting rights but which are subject to restrictions on transfer.
|
|
(13)
|
|
Includes
20,433 shares of
Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise by Ms. Heerdt of stock options that are exercisable as of
October 31, 2017
or exercisable within 60 days of
October 31, 2017
. Also includes
3,023
unvested restricted shares of Class A common stock over which Ms. Heerdt has voting rights but which are subject to restrictions on transfer.
Also includes 42 shares of Class A common stock purchased but not yet issued as of October 31, 2017 pursuant to our Associate Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
(14)
|
|
Includes (a
) 500,309 shares
of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options that are exercisable as of
October 31, 2017
or exercisable within 60 days of
October 31, 2017
and (b)
18,533
unvested restricted
shares of Class A common stock over which the directors and executives have voting rights but which are subject to restrictions on transfer.
Also includes 76 shares of Class A common stock purchased but not yet issued as of October 31, 2017 pursuant to our Associate Stock Purchase Plan.
Also includes 8,313,266 shares of Class B common stock beneficially owned or which may be deemed to be beneficially owned by Mr. Jacobson, our Chairman of the Board, or Mr. Erik Gershwind, our
President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the company,
which are convertible into shares of our Class A common stock on a share-for-share basis at any time. Please see also footnotes 3 and 8 to the Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners table, located on
pages
70
-
71
of this proxy statement.
|
|
(15)
|
|
Includes shares of Class B common stock beneficially owned or which may be deemed to be beneficially owned by Mr. Jacobson or Mr. Gershwind. Please see also footnotes 4 and 9 to the Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners table,
located on
pages
70
-
71
of this proxy statement.
|
74
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
SHAR
EHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR NEXT ANNUAL MEETING
Proposals of shareholders submitted under SEC Rule 14a-8 and intended for inclusion in our proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders in 201
9
must be received by us no later than
August
16, 2018
. Any such shareholder proposals may be included in our proxy statement for the
2019
annual meeting of shareholders so long as they are provided to us on a timely basis and satisfy the other conditions set forth in the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. For shareholder proposals submitted outside the processes of SEC Rule 14a-8 which are not included in our proxy statement and which may properly be presented for consideration at our
2019
annual meeting of shareholders, and in accordance with SEC Rule 14a-4(c), the proxy or proxies designated by us will have discretionary authority to vote on any such matter unless notice of the matter is received by us not later than
October
31, 2018
. Shareholder proposals should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc., 75 Maxess Road, Melville, New York 11747.
INFOR
MATION ABOUT THE MEETING
When and where is the annual meeting?
Our 2018
annual meeting of shareholders will be held at the Hilton Long Island/Huntington, 598 Broad Hollow Road, Melville, New York 11747, on
January
25
,
2018
at 9:00 a.m., local time.
What am I voting on?
You are voting on the following proposals:
|
·
|
|
to
elect
nine directors to serve for one-year terms;
|
|
·
|
|
to
ratify
the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting
firm for fiscal year
2018
;
|
|
·
|
|
to
approve
, on an advisory basis, the compensation o
f our named executive officers;
|
|
·
|
|
to conduct an advisory vote on the
preferred
frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers
; and
|
|
·
|
|
to consider and act upon such other matters as may properly come before the annual meeting or any
adjournments
or postponements thereof.
|
What are the voting recommendations of the Board of Directors?
Our Board recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the director nominees, “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting
firm for fiscal year
2018
, “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement
and every “ONE YEAR” as the
preferred
frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers.
Who is entitled to vote?
Only shareholders of record of our Class A common stock and our Class B common stock at the close of business on
December
7,
2017
, the record date, are eligible to vote at the annual meeting. On that date, we had outstandin
g
45,053,337
shares of our Class A common stock and
11,402,636
shares of our Class B common stock.
What is a shareholder of record?
You are a shareholder of record if you are registered as a shareholder with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
What is a beneficial shareholder?
You are a beneficial shareholder if a brokerage firm, bank, trustee or other agent holds your shares in their name for your benefit. This form of ownership is often called ownership in “street name,” since your name does not appear in our records. If you are a beneficial shareholder, you may vote by following the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee included with your proxy materials or with the instructions on how to access the proxy materials electronically.
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
75
What is a broker non-vote?
If you hold shares beneficially in street name and do not provide your broker, bank or other agent with voting instructions, your shares could constitute “broker non-votes.” Generally, broker non-votes occur on a matter when a broker is not permitted to vote on that matter without instructions from the beneficial owner and the beneficial owner does not provide instructions.
If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held in the name of a broker, and you do not provide your broker with voting instructions, the broker has the authority to vote your shares for or against certain “routine” matters. The proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting
firm for fiscal year
2018
is the only routine ma
tter being considered at the 2018
annual meeting.
We encourage you to provide instructions to your broker or other nominee so that your shares may be voted. If you do not provide instructions to your broker or other nominee, your shares will not be voted in the director elections or on the advisory vote on executive compensation.
What is a quorum?
A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to hold a shareholders meeting. Under New York law and our By-Laws, the presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of the total shares of our Class A common stock and our Class B common stock that are entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at the annual meeting.
What is the vote required for each proposal?
The election of each nominee for director requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. The approval of the proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting
firm for fiscal year
2018
, and the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement each requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or
by proxy at the annual meeting.
For the
advisory vote on the preferred frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers
, the option (one year, two years or three years) that receives the greatest number of votes
cast in person or
by proxy at the annual meeting
will be considered the frequency preferred by our shareholders
.
Abstentions will not affect the outcome of any matter being voted on at the meeting, assuming that a quorum is obtained. Broker non-votes are not counted for any purpose in determining whether a matter has been approved, but, along with abstentions, are considered present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum.
On all matters to be voted upon at the annual meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof, the record holders of our Class A common stock and our Class B common stock vote together as a single class, with each holder of Class A common stock entitled to one vote per share of Class A common stock and each holder of Class B common stock entitled to ten votes per share of Class B common stock.
How do I vote?
If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote in person at the
2018
annual meeting, on the Internet, by telephone or by signing, dating and mailing your proxy card. Detailed instructions for Internet voting are provided in the Notice of Internet Availability and instructions for Internet voting and telephone voting are provided in the printed proxy card. If you are a beneficial shareholder, you must follow the voting procedures provided by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee included with your proxy materials or with the instructions on how to access the proxy materials electronically.
If you are a record holder and you sign your proxy card without giving specific instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our Board (“FOR” all nine of our nominees to the Board, “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year
2018
, “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as
76
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
dis
closed in this proxy statement and
every “ONE YEAR” as the
preferred
frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers
)
.
If your shares are held in the
MSC Industrial Direct 401(k) Plan
, the enclosed proxy will serve as a voting instruction card for the trustee of
the
MSC Industrial Direct 401(k) Plan
, T. Rowe Price Trust Company, who will vote all shares of Class A common stock of the company allocated to your 401(k) account in accordance with your instructions. If the voting instruction card is returned without choices marked, and if not otherwise directed, the shares in your 401(k) account that are represented by the voting instruction card will
not
be voted.
What will happen if another matter properly comes before the annual meeting?
Our Board does not intend to bring any matter before the annual meeting except as specifically indicated in the accompanying notice and these proxy materials, nor does our Board know of any matters that anyone else proposes to present for action at the annual meeting. However, i
f any other matters are properly presented at the meeting for a vote, the enclosed proxy card confers discretionary authority to the individuals named as proxies to vote the shares represented by proxy as to those matters.
If I plan to attend the annual meeting, should I still vote by proxy?
All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting. However, to assure your representation at the annual meeting, we urge you to vote your shares as promptly as possible either by Internet, by telephone or by completing, signing and dating a printed proxy card and returning it in the postage-paid envelope provided. Any shareholder attending the annual meeting may vote in person, even if he or she has already voted or returned a proxy card.
If you vote by Internet, telephone or proxy and also attend the meeting, you do not need to vote again at the meeting, unless you want to change your vote. Written ballots will be available at the meeting for shareholders of record. Beneficial shareholders who wish to vote in person at the meeting must request a proxy from their broker or other nominee and bring that proxy to the annual meeting.
Who pays the cost for the solicitation of proxies?
We will pay any expenses for the solicitation of proxies for the annual meeting. Such solicitation may be made in person or by telephone by officers and associates of the company. Upon request, we will reimburse brokers, dealers, banks and trustees, or their nominees, for reasonable expenses that they incur in forwarding material to the beneficial owners of shares of our Class A common stock.
How do I change my vote?
Shareholders of record may revoke their proxies and change their vote by giving written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary before the annual meeting, by delivering later-dated proxies (either in writing, by telephone or over the Internet), or by voting in person at the meeting. Beneficial shareholders may change their vote by following the instructions of their broker, bank, trustee or other nominee
.
How may I obtain a separate set of proxy materials or request a single set for my household?
For registered shareholders who receive paper copies of this proxy statement, copies of our
2017
annual report
to shareholders are being mailed simultaneously with this proxy statement. All other registered shareholders will receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials and annual report online and how to request paper copies of our proxy materials and annual report. If you are a registered shareholder and want to save us the cost of mailing more than one copy of our proxy materials and annual report or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable, to the same address, we will discontinue, at your request to the Corporate Secretary of the company, mailing the duplicate copy to the account or accounts you select. Beneficial owners sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of proxy materials and annual reports or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable, and who wish to receive a single copy of such materials in the future, will need to contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of each document be mailed to all shareholders at the shared address.
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and
2017 Proxy Statement
77
If you are the beneficial owner, but not the record holder, of shares of our Class A common stock, your broker, bank or other nominee may deliver only one copy of this proxy statement and our
2017
annual report
or instructions on how to access the proxy materials electronically, as applicable, to multiple shareholders who share an address, unless that nominee has received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. If you are a beneficial holder and wish to receive multiple copies of such materials in the future, you will need to contact your broker, bank or other nominee to request multiple copies.
We will deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of this proxy statement and our
2017
annual report
or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable, to any registered shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document or documents was delivered. A registered shareholder who wishes to receive a separate copy of the proxy statement and annual report or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
, as applicable, now or in the future, should submit this request by writing to Corporate Secretary,
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc.
, 75 Maxess Road, Melville, New York 11747, or calling (516) 812-2000.
What is the address of your principal executive office?
The mailing address of our principal executive office is 75 Maxess Road, Melville, New York 11747. We also maintain a co-located headquarters at 525 Harbour Place Drive, Davidson, North Carolina 28036.
OTH
ER MATTERS
We will provide to each shareholder, without charge and upon written request, a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September
2, 2017
and any exhibit thereto.
Any such written request should be directed to the office of our Chief Financial Officer, c/o MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc., 75 Maxess Road, Melville, New York 11747.
It is important that your shares be represented at the meeting, regardless of the number of shares which you hold. If you are a registered shareholder, we urge you to vote promptly by Internet, by telephone or by dating, signing and mailing a printed proxy card. If you are a beneficial shareholder, we urge you to vote promptly by following the instructions provided by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
Steve Armstrong
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary
|
|
Melville, New York
December
15
,
2017
|