NEW YORK (AP) - The popular online hangout MySpace has won a $230 million
judgment over junk messages sent to its members in what is believed to be the
largest anti-spam award ever.
A federal judge in Los Angeles ruled against a notorious "Spam King,"
Sanford Wallace, and his partner, Walter Rines, after the two failed to show up
at a court hearing, MySpace told The Associated Press on Tuesday.
Wallace earned the monikers "Spam King" and "Spamford" as head of a company
that sent as many as 30 million junk e-mails a day in the 1990s. He left that
company, Cyber Promotions, following lawsuits from leading Internet service
providers such as Time Warner Inc.'s AOL, only to re-emerge in a spyware case
that led to a $4 million federal judgment against him in 2006.
"MySpace has zero tolerance for those who attempt to act illegally on our
site," said MySpace's chief security officer, Hemanshu Nigam. "We remain
committed to punishing those who violate the law and try to harm our members."
Rines and Wallace created their own MySpace accounts or took over existing
ones by stealing passwords through "phishing" scams, Nigam said.
They then e-mailed other MySpace members, he said, "asking them to check out
a cool video or another cool site. When you (got) there, they were making money
trying to sell you something or making money based on hits or trying to sell
ring tones."
MySpace said the pair sent more than 730,000 messages to MySpace members,
many made to look like they were coming from trusted friends, giving them an air
of legitimacy. Under the 2003 federal anti-spam law known as CAN-SPAM, each
violation entitles MySpace to $100 in damages, tripled when conducted "willfully
and knowingly."
In court papers, MySpace said the activities resulted in bandwidth and
delivery-related costs, along with complaints from hundreds of users. The
company also said some of the outside Web sites contained adult material,
potentially harming teens who use MySpace.
The judgment is a big victory for MySpace, although service providers often
have a tough time collecting such awards. But even if the News Corp.-owned site
never collects, it hopes the judgment deters other spammers.
"Anybody who's been thinking about engaging in spam are going to say, `Wow,
I better not go there,'" Nigam said. "Spammers don't want to be prosecuted. They
are there to make money. It's our job to send a message to stop them."
The Los Angeles-based company described the amount of the award as a
"landmark."
John Levine, a board member for the anti-spam advocacy group Coalition
Against Unsolicited Commercial Email, said that past spam judgments he knows of
have been in the tens of millions of dollars.
He said he would be surprised, though, if MySpace ever collected.
"The giant judgments are all defaults, which means they don't necessarily
even know how to find the spammer," Levine said.
There was no telephone listing for Wallace in the Las Vegas area, where he
moved to in 2004 to pursue night club promotion work. Service was disconnected
for two listed numbers for Rines in Stratham, N.H., his last known address; a
third number in Stratham was unlisted.
U.S. District Judge Audrey B. Collins awarded the amounts sought by MySpace:
$157.4 million jointly against Rines and Wallace and an additional $63.4 million
against Rines under CAN-SPAM -- plus $1.5 million more against the pair under
California's anti-phishing law and $4.7 million in attorneys fees. MySpace said
it was entitled to another $3 million from Rines and Wallace under a different
section of CAN-SPAM.
Collins also issued injunctions barring similar activities in the future.
MySpace has another anti-spam case pending against a high-profile defendant,
Scott Richter, who it claims gained access to MySpace profiles using stolen
passwords and then sent spam bulletins from those accounts.
MySpace said the junk messages from Wallace and Rines came after Richter's.
(This version CORRECTS amount of judgment in headline and story to conform
with itemization in court order.)
Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be
published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
|