By Christina Rexrode 

ST. LOUIS-- Citigroup Inc. shareholders voted to approve the pay packages of the bank's top executives, giving a shot of confidence to Chief Executive Michael Corbat in a year in which his firm has suffered setbacks.

At the annual shareholder meeting here, investors voted by an 85% margin to approve the compensation packages of Mr. Corbat and other top executives, according to preliminary company calculations of the nonbinding advisory vote. The pay packages approved included those of co-president Manuel Medina-Mora, risk and strategy head Brian Leach, and Chief Financial Officer John Gerspach.

Citigroup calculated Mr. Corbat's 2013 pay at $14.5 million.

Shareholders also re-elected all of Citigroup's directors and approved the appointment of its longtime auditor, KPMG. The votes capped a two-hour meeting in which shareholders generally gave Citigroup's management signs of support following a difficult period.

The bank is grappling with two major issues. In February, the bank revealed what it described as a fraud against its Mexico unit, where Mr. Medina-Mora also serves as chairman. Mexican authorities and the New York office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation have been investigating the matter.

Then in March, the Federal Reserve rejected Citigroup's request to expand its dividend and share buyback program during the stress-test process, which until recently had been overseen by Mr. Leach and Mr. Gerspach.

While many of the questions Tuesday focused on the stress-test rejection and the alleged fraud against the Mexico unit, known as Banamex, the meeting was largely cordial. Held in a hotel ballroom with seats for about 600, the meeting was less than half full.

Almost all of the questions came from a handful of the attendees, including CLSA analyst Michael Mayo and Jesse Jackson, who asked about low-income lending.

The votes give the bank, the country's third-largest by assets, a much-needed win. Two proxy-advisory firms, Glass Lewis & Co. and Egan-Jones, had advised shareholders to vote against the executive pay packages.

The so-called "say-on-pay" proposal is nonbinding, meaning the bank wouldn't have been required to make any changes even if it passed. But such a vote can serve as a key gauge of investor faith in a company's management. The bank and other companies have been required to put such a measure on the ballot in the wake of the financial crisis.

In 2012, with Vikram Pandit at the helm as CEO, the bank got its capital plan rejected by the Fed. That same year, shareholders voted against Mr. Pandit's $15 million pay package. By the end of the year, he had been pushed out of the firm.

Citigroup took pains to respond to shareholders' concerns after the 2012 vote, revamping its pay practices to more closely tie the executives' pay to the bank's performance. In 2013, 91% of shareholders approved the company's pay packages, up from 45% in 2012.

Mr. Corbat kicked off Tuesday's meeting by vowing that passing next year's stress test would be his "highest priority" for the rest of 2014. He said the bank's rejected request, where it asked to expand the quarterly dividend to five cents a quarter from one cent and the annual buyback program to $6.4 billion from $1.2 billion, had been "moderate and appropriate."

The company gave updates on a plan to move more of its offices from midtown Manhattan to lower Manhattan. The company's chairman, Michael O'Neill, also committed to webcasting the firm's next annual meeting.

The bank's recent problems have raised deeper concerns about reining in risk in a company as sprawling as Citigroup. But Mr. Corbat and Mr. O'Neill cautioned against conflating the stress-test rejection as a sign that regulators have a problem with the bank's underlying business model.

Mr. O'Neill said he didn't think there was "a huge amount of overlap" between the stress-test rejection and the bank's overall strategy.

But the executives also gave a nod to the difficulty of overseeing a large global bank like Citigroup. When Mr. Mayo, the analyst, asked if Citigroup was too big to manage, Mr. O'Neill replied that "it's certainly harder" to manage a bigger company. But, he added, Mr. Corbat's job "is to demonstrate that it can be."

"I can't simply sit in New York and declare a single strategy for the company," Mr. Corbat added. "We need to make sure that it's adhered to and that it's thought of in all the places" where the bank does business.

Still, when Mr. Mayo pressed for more details on the Fed's rejection, Mr. O'Neill replied that the conversations with regulators were subject to confidentiality.

As for the Banamex issue, Mr. Corbat told shareholders that Citigroup had fired one employee involved in what the bank has described as a billing fraud. He also said he expected that "others will be disciplined." Citigroup is continuing to investigate.

Citigroup shares rose 0.8% in afternoon trading and have fallen 7.6% so far this year, compared with small gains for the S&P 500 index and the KBW Bank Index.

Write to Christina Rexrode at christina.rexrode@wsj.com

Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires

Citigroup (NYSE:C)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Citigroup Charts.
Citigroup (NYSE:C)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Citigroup Charts.