TIDMCIU
RNS Number : 6821E
Cape plc
11 April 2014
11 April 2014
Cape plc ('Cape' or the 'Company')
Mailing of Annual Report, Notice of Annual General Meeting
and Electronic Documents and Information Letter
Cape announces that its Annual Report and Accounts for the year
ended 31 December 2013 (the "Annual Report"), the Notice of Annual
General Meeting ("Notice of AGM"), Form of Proxy and a letter
requesting the sending of documents and information by electronic
means ("Electronic Documents and Information Letter") have been
mailed to Ordinary Shareholders and the Scheme Shareholder (as
defined in the Company's Articles of Association).
Pursuant to Listing Rule 9.6.1, the Annual Report, Notice of
AGM, Form of Proxy and Electronic Documents and Information Letter
have been submitted to the National Storage Mechanism and will
shortly be available for inspection at: www.Hemscott.com/nsm.do and
can also be viewed on the Company's website at www.capeplc.com.
AGM Location
The Company's AGM will be held at 11.00am (BST) on Wednesday 14
May 2014 at the offices of Lawrence Graham LLP, 4 More London
Riverside, London SE1 2AU, United Kingdom.
Additional Information
In accordance with Disclosure and Transparency Rule 6.3.5(2)
(b), additional information is set out in the appendices to this
announcement. This information is extracted in full unedited text
from the Annual Report. References to page numbers are the
respective page numbers in the Annual Report. This information
should be read in conjunction with the Company's Preliminary
Announcement issued on 19 March 2014 and is not a substitute for
reading the full Annual Report.
Cape plc
Richard Allan
Company Secretary
Appendices:
Appendix 1: Directors' Responsibility Statement
The following directors' responsibility statement is extracted
from the 2013 Annual Report (page 76).
Directors' responsibilities
The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report
and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and
regulations. The directors are also responsible for the preparation
of the Directors' remuneration report, which they have chosen to
prepare, being under no obligation to do so under Jersey law. The
directors are also responsible for the preparation of the Directors
governance report under the Listing Rules.
Jersey company law requires the directors to prepare financial
statements for each financial period in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles prescribed for the purposes of the
law.
Under that law, the directors have prepared the group
consolidated financial statements and the parent company financial
statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union.
The financial statements are required by law to give a true and
fair view of the state of affairs of the Company at the period end
and also the profit or loss of the Company for the period then
ended. In preparing those financial statements, the directors
should:
- select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
- make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
- state that the financial statements comply with IFRSs as
adopted by the European Union, subject to any material departures
disclosed and explained in the financial statements; and,
- prepare the financial statements on the 'going concern' basis
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will
continue in business, in which case there should be supporting
assumptions or qualifications as necessary.
The directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting
records which are sufficient to show and explain the Company's
transactions and as such to disclose with reasonable accuracy at
any time the financial position of the Company and to enable them
to ensure that the financial statements comply with the law. They
are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and
the Group and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention
and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity
of the corporate and financial information included on the
Company's website. Legislation in Jersey governing the preparation
and dissemination of financial statements may differ from
legislation in other jurisdictions.
Responsibility statement under the Disclosure and Transparency
Rules
Each of the current directors, whose names and functions are
listed on page 62 confirms that, to the best of his knowledge:
- the consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance
with IFRS as adopted by the EU, give a true and fair view of the
assets, liabilities, financial position and profit of the Group and
the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as a whole;
and,
- the Directors' governance report (including the corporate
governance report and the Audit Committee report ) on pages 60 to
89 and the Regional and Chief Financial Officer's reviews on pages
40 to 48 include a fair review of the development and performance
of the business and the position of the Group and the undertakings
included in the consolidation taken as a whole, together with a
description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face
as set out in the risks and uncertainties review on pages 16 to
23.
Directors statement under the corporate governance code
The strategic report and this directors' governance report
(including the remuneration report) were reviewed and approved by
the Board on 18 March 2014. The Board confirms that, taken as a
whole, these reports represent a fair, balanced and understandable
report on the Group.
By order of the Board
Michael Speakman
Chief Financial Officer
18 March 2014
Appendix 2: Principal Risks & Uncertainties
The following description of the principal risks and
uncertainties that the Company faces is extracted from the 2013
Annual Report (pages 16 to 23)
Risks and opportunities
Cape has a renewed focus on risk management. The Board is
committed to enhance the Group's risk management capability.
Risk factors
Cape's performance and prospects may be affected by a number of
risks and uncertainties that relate to the industries and the
environments in which it undertakes its operations around the
world. The Group is alive to the issue of risk and has systems and
procedures in place across the Group to identify, assess and
mitigate major business risk.
Each region and central function is required to undertake a
formal review of risks which could impact its area of business.
Identified significant risks and agreed mitigation are formally
reviewed on a regular basis and are recorded in a standardised
active risks register. The Group continues to develop its risk
management systems and processes to ensure that our responses
remain appropriate to the range of risks that we face. A number of
the risks that Cape faces are also faced by other service providers
and finding rigorous methods of mitigating such risks can generate
competitive advantage. Where these apply, they are explained
further on pages 18 to 23.
These factors and the other information contained in this Annual
Report should be carefully considered. The following is a
description of the risks that may affect some or all of our
activities and which may affect the value of an investment in our
securities. If any of the events described below occurs, the
business, financial condition or results of operations of the Group
could be adversely affected in a material way. Additional risks and
uncertainties that the Group is unaware of or that it currently
deems immaterial may in the future have a material adverse effect
on the Group's business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Committees of the Board
Details of the Board and its committees can be found in the
Directors' Report and the Directors' Remuneration Report on pages
62 to 89.
Effective risk management
The effective identification, reporting and management of risk
is critical to the success of Cape. In light of the operational,
commercial and control issues that arose during 2012 and 2013,
actions continue to be taken to ensure the following systematic
approach is applied across the Group.
Identifying key risks
- To consistently apply the same methodology of identifying risk
at project, operation, business unit and Group level.
Analysing risks and controls
- Risks are evaluated to establish financial and non-financial
impacts, the likelihood of occurrence and the root cause. This
results in a prioritised register of risks, against which we then
review the nature, adequacy and appropriateness of our current
controls to mitigate these risks.
Determining management actions
- If new, different or additional risks are identified or if
additional controls are required, these are developed and
appropriate responsibilities to discharge are assigned. Investment
related risks are identified and assessed before key investment
decisions are made.
Reporting and monitoring
- Emerging risks are identified, reported and reviewed on an
ongoing basis, with particular focus on capturing emerging risk and
monitoring all changing risk during monthly business reviews.
Management is responsible for monitoring the effectiveness of
controls and progress of actions taken to mitigate our key risks;
this is supported through the Group's internal audit programme. The
results of the risk management process are reported to the Audit
Committee at least every six months.
Further details of the Group's internal control and risk
management processes can be found in the Directors' governance
report on pages 60 and 89.
2012 events and the Operational Excellence Programme
The identification of events during 2012, such as significant
losses on a small number of major projects; inadequate forecasting
in light of deteriorating project performance and trading
conditions, poor control of fixed assets, and inconsistent
Group-wide application of accounting policies; has demonstrated
that, in certain instances, the control environment was
insufficiently robust either in the identification, the escalation
or the timely management and mitigation of such control
failures.
Operational Excellence Programme
In response to these events, in 2013 the Group initiated an
Operational Excellence Programme, tasked with identifying the key
issues preventing consistently high operational performance and
addressing them by identifying best practice and then standardising
and rolling out those best practices to all parts of the Group.
This programme made good progress in 2013 and will continue in 2014
and beyond.
The Operational Excellence Programme has three goals. Firstly,
to develop and provide operational management with the best
available tools and procedures to manage and monitor operational
activities, particularly large projects. Secondly, through improved
recruitment, training and management development, provide the whole
Group with a pool of operational management with the practical and
leadership skills necessary to consistently manage our current and
foreseeable operations and projects. Thirdly, to codify best
practice and ensure it is operated consistently across all
activities and geographies.
Risk category
External risks
Global political, security and economic conditions
Description and potential impact
Operating activities may be affected by factors outside the
Group's control. These include geo-political events, such as
tensions in the Middle East or CIS, government actions or
inactions, climatic conditions, unusual or unexpected geological
occurrences, environmental hazards, industrial conditions,
technical failures, labour disputes, delays in construction,
availability of materials or parts and shipping, import or customs
delays.
Changes in the political or security environment in existing and
new territories may result in Cape, or its clients, losing
commercial or legal protections, facing security threats or being
less able to control their operations.
Evolution in 2013
Incidence and severity of geopolitical and economic instability
has increased in some locations (ME/Gulf) and reduced in others
(end of Algeria project). The net impact is broadly neutral.
Regional management teams have been strengthened with new
managers (regional director changes, commercial and HR directors in
ME) that are more attuned to such risks.
Mitigation
These external factors are normally likely to affect a specific
location, client relationship or a single contract. Cape's business
is diverse by geography, number of client sites, range of services
and exposure to industries or sectors. This portfolio
diversification reduces the impact of Cape's overall exposure to
individual risks and uncertainties. Where specific risks are
identified, measures are taken in a proportional manner to reduce
or eliminate them to an acceptable level or orchestrate a
withdrawal from the activity in question.
Cape's policy is to avoid a concentration of activity in
markets/regions which it assesses as high risk.
Risk is mitigated by a strong senior management presence in each
region and particularly where risks are identified, regions operate
in close communication with central management. Along with the OE
initiative to improve training of managers and to encourage and
facilitate the sharing of relevant experiences and knowledge
between peers.
General counsel is regularly engaged to ensure compliance with
local legislation and to advise managers on actual or potential
changes in legal or regulatory framework.
We monitor carefully any changes in political regimes that might
impact on our business. Cape has an in-house Head of Security, who
is responsible for security coordination in higher risk territories
and we have expanded our use of specialist consultancies to perform
background research, advise us and when necessary, provide
protection.
Opportunities
Existing and potential risks often differ between regions within
a country and the specific locations where Cape staff work are kept
under regular review.
Opportunities could exist if perceptions of risk differ from the
reality.
Market risks
Key client dependency
Description and potential impact
Losing certain key clients could have an adverse effect on
Cape's revenues.
The majority of Cape's clients are either in, or are directly or
indirectly dependent upon, the energy and natural resources
sectors. A proportion of Cape's earnings therefore depend on stable
long-term energy demand particularly for oil, gas and
electricity.
Evolution in 2013
Client dependency is essentially unchanged in 2013.
Management have become increasingly focused on the importance of
client responsiveness and developing multiple level
relationships.
Mitigation
Cape's top 10 clients accounted for 38% of Group revenues in
2013 (2012: 40%), with the largest customer accounting for 11% of
Group revenues (2012: 11%). Cape has a broad customer base, with
circa 105 clients (2012: 104) clients each contributing more than
GBP1 million to annual revenue. Cape seeks to maintain a stable and
balanced customer profile.
Cape has developed long-standing relationships with clients,
based on service quality, reliability and safety. These
relationships are at multiple levels from site supervisors to
senior management. Strong 'client responsive' relationships support
revenue retention and growth through ongoing contract award and
renewal.
Opportunities
Strong customer relationships based on consistent high service
levels produce opportunities to cross sell both additional services
and into new locations.
Key market dependency
Description and potential impact
Cyclical downturns could lead to declines in demand for Cape's
services.
Evolution in 2013
Key market dependency is essentially unchanged in 2013.
Mitigation
In most existing markets Cape has a relatively small market
share.
Most contracts cover a multi-year engagement and are for work of
a long-term nature. Cape, therefore, has limited exposure to
fluctuations in the spot price of any one energy product, or its
short-term demand.
Cape is firmly positioned in the downstream energy
infrastructure, power generation and later cycle production
markets. These markets are less impacted by cyclical downturns than
upstream, exploration segments. In some industries, there is a
counter-cyclical effect with extra maintenance (outages) required
on off-line assets, when demand falls or spot prices decline.
Opportunities
Cape's wide range of essential services ensures it can serve
clients' needs through the lifecycle of the production asset,
whether related to installation, maintenance, extension of life or
decommissioning.
Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) risks
Achievement of HSE excellence
Inherent site dangers
Description and potential impact
Many clients have sites that have inherent dangers with
associated health and safety risks (offshore platforms, refineries,
and power stations).
Failure to maintain the highest HSE standards on-site could
result in injury to our employees or others involved in site
operations.
Failure to deliver HSE excellence could result in a material
loss of clients and/or damage to Cape's reputation and the
environment.
Evolution in 2013
During 2013 as part of the OE project, the Cape CMS system,
which is a Cape-wide set of operating and HSEQ instructions, was
reviewed, redesigned and is being moved onto a user friendly IT
platform that will be securely accessible from all sites
worldwide.
For further details of safety awards see the Corporate and
Social Responsibility ('CSR') report on page 49.
Mitigation
Cape values its excellent reputation for safety and HSE related
matters around the world. Cape's investment in systems and
resources, with around 455 people (2012: 455) in full-time HSE
roles across the Group, continues to deliver a superior performance
in accidents, working days lost and environmental incidents
(further details are set out in the CSR on pages 49 to 57).
Occupational health and safety performance continues to be in
the upper quartile of comparable companies, with a Total Recordable
Incident Rate (TRIR) of 0.92 per million hours worked (2012: 1.656
per million) for the Group as a whole.
Through both its training centres and on-site training courses,
Cape invests a considerable amount in improving staff skills. This
helps retain key staff through regular progression, helps reduce
skills shortages and improves safety performance.
Opportunities
Demonstration of an excellent HSE performance is increasingly
becoming a pre-qualification requirement for most large oil, gas,
mineral and power generation tenders.
Skills shortages and HR risks
Recruitment, development and retention of key managers,
supervisors or skilled employees
Description and potential impact
The loss of key managers, supervisors or skilled employees, may
adversely affect Cape's business. Cape's ability to successfully
operate and grow the business is largely dependent on its ability
to attract and retain high-quality personnel. An inability to
attract and retain well-qualified and skilled personnel could
materially adversely affect Cape's business, operating results or
financial condition.
The lack of capacity, capability or competence of Cape managers
would have a significant adverse impact on the business.
Evolution in 2013
OE and other initiatives to attract, retain and develop key
staff started in 2013 and will continue into 2014 including:
- Standardisation of corporate recruitment and other HR processes
- Enhanced remuneration review processes and long term incentive plan
- Improved staff performance review and management development processes
- Introduction of matrix management and cross business training
- Appointment of Asia based COO to review, supervise and
motivate staff in the more remote locations
Mitigation
Cape's regionalised organisational structure provides
considerable management autonomy and opportunity for supervisors
and managers to develop within the business. This has both
advantages and risks, so to gain the advantages, while mitigating
the risks, the Group is taking the following steps:
- The Future Leaders Programme was introduced to provide
managers with the skills to effectively perform their roles and
progress in the organisation. The Cape Management Training Scheme
has been introduced to provide a regular pipeline of talent for key
management roles across the Group. Annual performance appraisals
are conducted to assess executives' performance and to discuss
career goals. All these processes have been reviewed and improved
in 2013.
- In 2013 the OE initiative undertook to improve the strength
and depth of management talent at key levels within the business by
assessing needs and resources and then introducing training and
other procedures to improve the capability, capacity and
competences needed for the businesses today and in the years
ahead.
- Senior executive remuneration is reviewed against market data
provided by specialist remuneration consultants to ensure awards
are competitive. Long-term incentive plans are in place to
encourage the retention of the key management group.
Opportunities
Retaining talented staff and engendering long term loyalty has
many advantages to both Cape and staff, including:
- Reduced recruitment fees and basic training cost.
- Retention of knowledge and skill
- Efficiency improvements.
- Growth of discipline and industry specialisms.
- Establishment of a core of in-house trainers.
- Internal career development paths and opportunities.
- Improved operational robustness, staff cover and succession paths.
Contract acceptance risk
Terms and conditions risk
Contract bidding and estimating risk
Description and potential impact
Cape could sign up to contract terms and conditions exposing the
Group to excessive financial risks and potential cost overruns.
Due to errors in the accurate determination, scope and poor
estimates or changes in on-site circumstances, Cape may not be able
to recover all costs incurred resulting in an adverse financial
performance.
Evolution in 2013
An experienced General counsel was appointed this year. He is
responsible for ensuring group-wide compliance in new contract
negotiations and is currently conducting a review to reassess the
risks in existing contracts.
Mitigation
Cape's policy is to avoid lump sum or fixed rate contracts, with
the large majority of contracts being cost reimbursable or at
scheduled rates. To ensure this applies, contract acceptance
authorisation procedures and controls have continued to be
strengthened over the last 2 years. The Group has also introduced a
system of 'Peer review' for significant and material projects.
The Group seeks to avoid the acceptance of liabilities that are
unquantifiable or for which we could not reasonably be regarded as
responsible, including design responsibility, customer or other
party delays, liquidated damages, direct and indirect consequential
losses. The adequacy of insurance covers is reassessed
annually.
Opportunities
Improved contract acceptance management will have a beneficial
effect on long term margin.
Operational risk
Operational and project performance risk
Description and potential impact
Actual project performance may differ materially from 'as bid'
or forecast performance.
The Group's financial performance could be significantly
affected by the operational performance of a relatively small
number of large contracts.
Evolution in 2013
During the year the 'cost to complete' review identified an
onerous contract, primarily because extra costs incurred by Cape
could not be passed on to the client. The losses were identified at
an early stage and where possible a number of corrective management
actions were taken to re-engineer costs and so mitigate the
losses.
Appointment of an Asia based COO to regularly review and
supervise the more remote projects and businesses.
Mitigation
The Group has a strong track record of successful project
execution which reflects a practical and client focused approach to
both construction and maintenance project management. In response
to certain construction project performance issues during 2012, the
'operational excellence' initiative commenced. Some OE benefits
were evident in 2013, but they will largely impact 2014 and future
years, and include:
- A professional approach to contract bidding and contract
management, including in-house training of project managers to gain
APM professional qualifications.
- Recognition of project management as a key competence within
Cape, and a focus on managing the resource Cape-wide.
- Development of a project management toolkit for new projects,
including a standardised project planning and delivery system and a
site IT system with standardised KPIs.
- Initiating standardised, detailed, regular reviews of projects
and cost to complete calculations in all businesses, with risk
based escalation and overriding Regional and Central reviews.
- Access from all sites to the redesigned user friendly
Cape-wide set of operating instructions (CMS).
Opportunities
Improved project management will improve the consistency of
project execution, which will improve customer perception and so
have a beneficial effect on long term margin.
Investment and asset integrity risks
Unacceptable return on assets or investments
Description and potential impact
Failure to achieve satisfactory returns on assets, acquisitions,
joint ventures, partnership arrangements and other investments.
Inadequate management and financial controls leading to loss of
operational control, loss of assets, loss of financial data or loss
of the integrity of data.
Evolution in 2013
An experienced General counsel and Company Secretary appointed
this year will improve the in-house legal advice available for
strategic investment structuring, during investment negotiations
and the governance over existing investments.
Detailed mobile asset control processes have been tightened,
with further tightening planned for 2014.
Mitigation
Cape carries out detailed assessments and reviews of existing
and potential acquisition, joint venture, partnership arrangements
and other investments including internal legal and financial
diligence, with external support when appropriate.
To assess and to help mitigate these risks Cape has high quality
and experienced legal, commercial, operations, finance,
acquisitions, internal audit, tax and treasury teams that operate
at Group level and across the regions.
Opportunities
An increasingly professional approach to investment
decision-making, management and control will add value by improving
the return on capital employed.
Inadequate visibility or reporting over operations or assets
Description and potential impact
Disparate and old IT systems across much of Cape are a risk to
management and financial control and prevent management at all
levels from optimising performance.
Evolution in 2013
A Chief Information Officer (CIO) was appointed in 2013, tasked
with co-ordinating infrastructure, improving the robustness of
business systems generally and specifically the Group's ERP
provision.
Mitigation
Work has commenced within the OE project, on the scoping out of
a uniform ERP system that will link with existing site systems for
eventual worldwide implementation.
UK and ME IT has been moved to professionally hosted data
centres that operate to robust internationally recognised security
and DR standards.
Opportunities
A uniform ERP system will significantly improve management's
visibility of operations and financial results.
Compliance and business conduct risks
Breach of applicable laws and regulations
Business integrity and ethical conduct risk
Failure to obtain/renew key licences and permits
Failure to manage key relationships
Description and potential impact
Breach of applicable laws and regulations including tax,
anti-bribery and anti-corruption, competition and business conduct
laws and failure to file necessary statutory and regulatory
returns. Failure to renew key operating licences and permits,
including asbestos removal and waste transfer licences. Failure to
manage key corporate relationships including those with key
customers, joint venture partners, investors, the Scheme
shareholder and scheme trustee directors, banking consortium and
pensions trustees.
Evolution in 2013
A new General counsel was appointed to focus on compliance,
legal risk management and business integrity and ethics. The newly
appointed COO's role includes a focus on strategic management of
key contracts and customers. The new executive management team has
built strong relationships with all key stakeholders.
Mitigation
To assess and manage these corporate risks Cape has high quality
and experienced finance, investor relations, corporate, internal
audit, tax, treasury, legal and compliance teams that operate at
Group level and across the regions. Continued strengthening of key
customers account management along with customer needs and
satisfaction reviews. Completion of the refinancing has provided
increased certainty and stability in the Group's financing and
banking relationships.
Opportunities
Good legal compliance and improved corporate relationships will
increase certainty and stability, allowing management focus to
shift towards strategic business development and growth.
IDC provision adequacy risks
Material underestimate of the IDC funding requirement
Description and potential impact
Failure to properly quantify future cash flows related to
industrial disease claims and changes in the external claims
environment (including changes in the law and judicial
processes).
Evolution in 2013
The 2013 triennial scheme valuation (carried out by external
actuaries) was undertaken using the Group's cumulative claims
history and updated economic assumptions.
Mitigation
The court-approved 2006 Scheme of Arrangement protects the
interests of future IDC claimants whilst at the same time
protecting the Group from the impact of extreme adverse changes in
the claims environment.
Opportunities
The Group is proactively managing the IDC claims process to
ensure a fair and speedy response to industrial disease claimants
whilst seeking to minimise the erosion of scheme funds through
payment of excessive claimant and defendant legal costs.
General financial risks
Foreign exchange and interest rate exposure
Description and potential impact
Financial risks including foreign exchange, interest rate risk,
credit risk, liquidity risk, capital management and financial
derivatives are described further in note 25 to the consolidated
financial statements.
Evolution in 2013
No significant change.
Mitigation
To assess and mitigate these risks, Cape has high-quality and
experienced finance personnel both centrally and in operations
addressing the activities of finance, internal audit, tax and
treasury.
Appendix 3: Related party transactions
Details of directors' emoluments are shown in note 37 'Related
party transactions' to the consolidated financial statements and in
the Directors' Remuneration Report on pages 84 to 89.
There have been no material transactions with the Company and
other related parties during the year.
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END
MSCQKDDKQBKDAQD
Cape PLC (LSE:CIU)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Cape PLC (LSE:CIU)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024