Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2016 and 2015

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION

Organization, Nature of Business and Trade Name

Intelligent Highway Solutions, Inc. (the “Company” or “IHS”) was formed on April 22, 2011; IHS is a technology based intelligent highway solutions contractor. Through June 30, 2013, the Company’s primary focus was in the California transportation market providing services that range from providing labor, materials, and related equipment for corrective service and maintenance services for the State’s transportation infrastructure. Since that time, the Company has devoted its time to electrical service contracts. Additionally, the Company intends to develop transportation technology services that enable vehicles, roads, traffic lights, message signs, and other elements to become “intelligent” by embedding them with microchips and sensors and by empowering them to communicate with each other via wireless technologies. The acceleration of data collection and communication will allow state governments to improve transportation system performance by reducing congestion and increasing both traveler safety and convenience. On March 9, 2017, the Company acquired all of the outstanding ownership interest in Crescent Construction Company, Inc., a full-service general contracting firm.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plan is to obtain such resources for the Company by obtaining capital from management and significant shareholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses and seeking equity and/or debt financing. However management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Management plans to fund future operations through short term related party loans as well as convertible and non-convertible debt with non-related parties.

NOTE 3 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. A change in managements’ estimates or assumptions could have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations during the period in which such changes occurred.

Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company’s financial statements reflect all adjustments that management believes are necessary for the fair presentation of their financial condition and results of operations for the periods presented.

INTELLIGENT HIGHWAY SOLUTIONS, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2016 and 2015

NOTE 3 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2016 or 2015.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property and equipment are carried at cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged against operations. Renewals and betterments that materially extend the life of the assets are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in income for the period.

Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The estimated useful lives of depreciable assets are:

For federal income tax purposes, depreciation is computed under the modified accelerated cost recovery system. For financial statements purposes, depreciation is computed under the straight-line method. Balances of each asset class as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 were:

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $4,638 and $9,984, respectively.

Other accrued expenses mainly consists of accrued consulting fees due to management and other consulting firms as well as state and federal income taxes payable.

Revenues and Cost of Revenues

Revenues from fixed-price and cost-plus contracts are recognized on the percentage of completion method, whereby revenues on long-term contracts are recorded on the basis of the Company’s estimates of the percentage of completion of contracts based on the ratio of the actual cost incurred to total estimated costs. This cost-to-cost method is used because management considers it to be the best available measure of progress on these contracts. Revenues from cost-plus-fee contracts are recognized on the basis of costs incurred during the period plus the fee earned, measured on the cost-to-cost method.

INTELLIGENT HIGHWAY SOLUTIONS, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2016 and 2015

NOTE 3 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Revenues and Cost of Revenues (continued)

Cost of revenues include all direct material, sub-contract, labor, and certain other direct costs, as well as those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor and fringe benefits. Selling, general and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changed in job performance, job conditions and estimated profitability may result in revisions to cost and income, which are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Changes in estimated job profitability resulting from job performance, job conditions, contract penalty provisions, claims, change orders, and settlements, are accounted for as changes in estimates in the current period. Claims for additional contract revenue are recognized when realization of the claim in probable and the amount can be reasonably determined.

The asset, “cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts” represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed. The liability, “billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts,” represents billings in excess of revenues recognized.

Cost of sales totaled $0 and $214,454 during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Fair Value Measurements

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs. A fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined into the following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

Derivative Liabilities

The Company records a debt discount related to the issuance of convertible debts that have conversion features at adjustable rates. The debt discount for the convertible instruments is recognized and measured by allocating a portion of the proceeds as an increase in additional paid-in capital and as a reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible instrument equal to the intrinsic value of the conversion features. The debt discount will be accreted by recording additional non-cash gains and losses related to the change in fair market values of derivative liabilities over the life of the convertible notes.

Related Party Transactions

The registrant follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the Related parties include (a) affiliates of the registrant; (b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; (c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; (d) principal owners of the registrant; (e) management of the registrant; (f) other parties with which the registrant may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and (g) Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had related party transactions with members of its management and management’s immediate family members.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: (a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; (b) description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; (c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and (d) amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Net Loss Per Share

Net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the specified period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares during the specified period. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, potential common shares are not included in the diluted net loss per share calculation as their effect would be anti-dilutive. Such potentially dilutive shares are excluded when the effect would be to reduce net loss per share. There were 13,005,173,549 and 13,680,002,638 such potentially dilutive shares excluded for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The potentially dilutive shares arise from the following instruments:

There were 365,237 and 631,905 options and warrants exercisable as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 that were not considered to be anti-dilutive due to the exercise prices being greater than the close price of our common stock as of the reporting date.

Reclassification of Prior Period Presentation

Certain amounts have been reclassified on the December 31, 2015 balance sheet to conform to current period presentation. Specifically, long term prepaid expenses of $34,965 have been reclassified as current prepaid expenses and a $3,000 contra-liability for related party payables has been removed from current notes payable and is included in related party payables. These reclassifications have no impact on net loss.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASC 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810) - Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis.” This standard modifies existing consolidation guidance for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and requires either a retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted has this standard and determined it does not have a significant impact on its financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments.” This update eliminates the requirement to restate prior period financial statements for measurement period adjustments. The new guidance requires that the cumulative impact of a measurement period adjustment (including the impact on prior periods) be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is identified. The new standard should be applied prospectively to measurement period adjustments that occur after the effective date. The new standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and early adoption is permitted. The Company has adopted this guidance and the adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or cash flows for the three or six months ended March 31, 2017 or 2016.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting . ” The amendments in this update simplify several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted the new guidance on January 1, 2017. The primary impact of adoption was the recognition of excess tax benefits in our provision for income taxes rather than paid-in capital. However, as the Company has a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax asset, a corresponding adjustment was recorded to increase the valuation allowance.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “ Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”. The amendments in this update simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. This update is effective for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing after January 1, 2017. The Company notes that this guidance applies to its reporting requirements and will implement the new guidance accordingly in performing goodwill impairment testing; however, the Company does not believe this update will have a material impact on the financial statements.

Management believes recently issued accounting pronouncements will have no impact on the financial statements of the Company.

NOTE 5 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

As discussed in Note 3, on a recurring basis, we measure certain financial assets and liabilities based upon the fair value hierarchy. The following table presents information about the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:

As of December 31, 2016, the Company had a $11,855,072 derivative liability balance on the balance sheet and recorded a loss from derivative liability fair value adjustment of $10,781,397 during the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company assessed its outstanding convertible notes payable as summarized in Note 8 – Convertible Notes Payable and determined certain convertible notes payable with variable conversion features contain embedded derivatives and are therefore accounted for at fair value under ASC 920, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures and ASC 825, Financial Instruments.

Utilizing Level 2 Inputs, the Company recorded fair market value adjustments related to convertible notes payable for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 of $10,781,397 and $522,468, respectively. The fair market value adjustments were calculated utilizing the Black-Sholes method using the following assumptions: risk free rate of 0.85%, dividend yield of 0%, expected life of 1 year, and volatility of 198% to 199%.

A summary of the activity of the derivative liability is shown below:

Required principal payments from December 31, 2016 forward are as follows:

There was $27,377 and $7,083 of accrued interest payable on non-convertible notes payable as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

NOTE 7 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

The Company has entered into various convertible debt agreements to fund operations. A summary of outstanding convertible notes payable is as follows: