Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP) Quote

@b3.....WMI stated that common equity, and preferred stock were CANCELLED, EXTINGUISHED, AND ALL RIGHTS TO THE PROSPECTUS IS NULL AND VOID.......it also states that "Title to all assets belong to WMIH, JPM, and the FDIC.........question: if WMI gets signed releases which allows them to cancel the stock, and the prior values inherent in the previous ownership as beneficiaries, does that NOT ALSO CANCEL THE BENEFICIARY OWNERSHIP OF COMMON AND PREFERRED HOLDERS OF THOSE ASSETS?????.....said another way:.... by signing a release, one signs his beneficiary rights to previous ownership of assets that were rightfully his....IMO, this is why WMI states that "all title to (previous) assets belong to WMI, JPM, and the FDIC....as you stated, chapter11 is a very complex legal procedure , and requires RELEASE SIGNATURES by the shareholders that own the company, and creditors who possess claims against any earnings...having said that, the FDIC is now holding a 14 billion dollar loss on the balance sheet which has first priority to any remaining assets generated by these Trusts...however, the FDIC has said, that they do not foresee any relief for common and preferred equity...WMI has said the same when they declared the equity classes 19, and 22 as being "impaired" from future recovery...... thank you for your post.... Lodas

Bk Chapter 11 has been closed for some time now…..since 2019….

Getting closer to break 80.00…it will break before the of 48 hours

I believe this to be very positive news. Not to mention, the timing a day before the conference call and a month before the shareholders meeting. Makes me wonder, what else is to come, what are they getting ready for and what are they piecing together? I’ll use one of your famous lines, HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!

Timing of Payments:
The timing of payments to trust beneficiaries depends on the bankruptcy process.
It’s possible that some distributions may occur before the Chapter 11 bankruptcy is finalized, especially if there are available funds.

However, bankruptcy proceedings can be lengthy, and beneficiaries may need to be PATIENT.

Another all time high 79.60

Doesn’t mean squat to escrow holders of P. And Q. Show the money already!!

Coming soon more free shares to executives…

2 New Executives!,
Good morning Board, The Infamous Kevin Barker from Piper Sandler always first in line to ask questions during Company conference calls and Ranjit from Wells Fargo! https://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=93699409

Two Major Shareholders and one of them holds Trust accounts of the Estate. Wow! This is Huge!

https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/NASDAQ/mr-cooper-COOP/stock-news/93699409/mr-cooper-group-announces-two-new-senior-leaders

Future Value (FV) of the Continuously Compounded @ 5% ~$652,174,860.47
Total Interest $274,174,860.47
Total Contributions - 18M per qtr. x 20 qtrs.
$360,000,000.00

minus what the trustee(s) is being compensated. My Napkin...

In December 2017, the DC Circuit Court ruled that the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) cannot seize beneficiary ownership of trusts. The case was won by Deutsche Bank Trust Company. As a result, the FDIC was compelled to return $600 million of JPMorgan Chase’s down payment for Washington Mutual Bank (WMB). The income generated from all the Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) trusts, which amounted to an impressive $8 billion in profit in 2007, rightfully belonged to the beneficiaries of those trusts. This legal decision clarified the rights and protections of trust beneficiaries in the context of FDIC-insured banks

Indeed, the old shareholders of Washington Mutual (WAMU) stock are indeed considered the beneficiaries of those trusts. However, it’s essential to understand the nuances of the situation:

Trust Beneficiaries:
The income generated from the Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) trusts rightfully belongs to the beneficiaries of those trusts.
In this context, the old shareholders of WAMU stock are indeed beneficiaries because they indirectly hold an interest in the MBS trusts through their ownership of WAMU stock.
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy:
Chapter 11 bankruptcy is a reorganization process that allows a company to continue operating while restructuring its debts.
During Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, the company (in this case, WAMU) aims to reorganize its financial affairs and emerge as a viable entity.
The bankruptcy court oversees the process, and creditors (including trust beneficiaries) have a say in the reorganization plan.
Distribution of Assets:
The distribution of assets during bankruptcy depends on the specific circumstances and the court’s decisions.
Generally, secured creditors (such as bondholders) receive priority in asset distribution.
Unsecured creditors (including trust beneficiaries) may receive payments based on the available assets after secured creditors are satisfied.
Shareholders (including old shareholders of WAMU stock) are typically last in line for distributions.
Timing of Payments:
The timing of payments to trust beneficiaries depends on the bankruptcy process.
It’s possible that some distributions may occur before the Chapter 11 bankruptcy is finalized, especially if there are available funds.
However, bankruptcy proceedings can be lengthy, and beneficiaries may need to be patient.
Legal Complexity:
Bankruptcy cases involve complex legal proceedings, negotiations, and court decisions.
The specifics of how trust beneficiaries will be compensated depend on the court’s rulings, the company’s financial situation, and the reorganization plan.
In summary, while trust beneficiaries (including old WAMU shareholders) have a rightful claim to income from the MBS trusts, the bankruptcy process introduces legal complexities. It’s advisable to consult legal experts or monitor official bankruptcy updates for accurate information regarding distributions and payments during the Chapter 11 proceedings .

👉👉👉COOP Q1'24 earnings TOMORROW, April 24 (pre-market)

See: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240404446961/en/Mr.-Cooper-Group-Inc.-to-Discuss-First-Quarter-2024-Financial-Results-on-April-24-2024

Yes December 2017 the DC circuit court as reported by Globic ruled that the FDIC cannot seize beneficiary ownership of trusts. The suit was won by Deusche Bank Trust Company. This forced the FDIC to give back $600m of JPMs down payment of WMB because the income from all the MBS trusts($8 billion of profit in 2007) belonged to the beneficiaries of the trusts. Lodas go back research all the posts on this board late 2017 and 2018. It’s all there, including the trust beneficiary clause in all the MBS trusts! There is a group of trusts that have the P preferred owners as Beneficiaries but the vast majority including the big boy WMCT2001( CMBS) are beneficially owned by WM commons. Your are a very wealthy man Lodas and I look forward to your party in Malibu!
Semper Fi

The story that you posted is from 2018.
The story that Ron reposted is from 2020. The name game there's a freaky thing here.

I believe that was the one we got a few cents.
Or those shares in COOP based on amount of common and preferred held?

JHD

@johniconfer.........WADR, what, or how were you instilled with the idea that "we are beneficiaries of the Trusts"?......do you possess documents that profess your assertion, or did others instill you with this idea from their opinions?.....the WMIH 2013 10-K, an official document submitted to the SEC, by independent auditors doing a forensic Fresh Start accounting of the residual assets of WMI post chapter 11 closing states the following..... " Title to all assets belong to the reorganized Debtor (WMIH), JPM, and the FDIC"....did you read this document?, and if you did, are you in conformance with what WMIH says, and if you disagree, by what reasons do you disagree?....as you are aware, WMI filed a chapter 11 restructuring to pay creditors and exit from chapter 11 to restructure the company... in what way does the assets of the former company flow to former shareholders when the company merely restructures itself, and continues without dissolution.? have you seen this so called SEC allowed Preferred managing
Sub that AZ Cowboy says exists, and whose name is on the beneficiary, or are you just assuming this because AZ Cowboy told you.... your response will be greatly appreciated... Lodas

Do You Feel Like Dancing?

I do.

Globic is finally settled.



Ron

When would that first distribution have been, somewhere around April, 2012?

1st distrubtion being the wmih shares (?), yes I did. It’s been soooo long ago,, lol.

WMIH Corp, is Mr Cooper Group. They changed their name... The deflecting of this fact, to create a buzz about delusional fantasyland nonsense, is incredibly strange. It seems the need to deviate from reality, to create fantasy, that in turn, creates another fantasy, that points to fantasy riches, will never end...

WMIH CORP. COMPLETES REVERSE STOCK SPLIT AND NAME CHANGE TO MR. COOPER GROUP INC.

https://www.mrcoopergroup.com/press-releases/wmih-corp-completes-reverse-stock-split-and-name-change-to-mr-cooper-group-inc/

Did you get the first distribution? If so, then you are on the list for the next distribution to happen any time now. I wish I knew the exact day of the next payout but nobody does.
Will it be COOP shares, or Libor cash. Both are looming.

I feel sorry for many of those who did not release because some did it thinking they could just sue. But it won't work out for them that way. Release = escrows.

Remember to discreetly and prudently help those in need....but trust no one. Keep your windfall to yourself or you'll have people tripping over your sidewalk constantly.

Ok understood. Reasonable and logical. :) thanksyou!

"One ISIN Number owned by WMIH CORP, is the MR COOPER (COOP) common shares. MR Cooper is truly not the parent. It is WMIH CORP."


HMMMMMMMMMMMMMM, YOU DONT SAY!


"boarddork

Re: Juschilln post# 633778

Monday, September 21, 2020 6:22:17 PM
Post# of 726632
thanks! you're not gonna believe what I'm finding so far researching WMIH Corp's ACTIVE 40 (forty) ISIN numbers, listed on their holding company LEI identification number. That is 40 separate securitiy identifiers. Specifically, ISIN number represents

I'll post when finished with all of them, but I'm finding a large portion of these ISIN number were "Exchanged for Bonds" and then it lists the bond it became (ie WMIH 8.2508/15/06 LIQd (Liquidated)).

Many fo these ISIN security numbers registered to WMIH CORP the holding company of Mr Cooper Group, that were also "Exchanged for Bonds" of various names..so far....are all stating MATd (Matured).

A significant amount of the ISIN numbers for WMIH CORP have "No Info". Since only MATd (Matured) and LIQd (Liquidated) seem to be recorded...might it be possible that these "no info" ISIN numbers still reflect the original securities functioning in safe harbor...ie winding down? I think so. Otherwise, the would show liquidated or matured. There is no other explanation for an "ACTIVE" ISIN security tracking number owned by WMIH CORP, the holding company, merely name changed to Mr Cooper Group.


I'm halfway through the list. I post if anything changes.

But holy moly, WMIH CORP is alive and well, is the holding company for MR COOPER, and.....and... still holding its legacy securities..or for the time being....still holding title ,by ISIN Numbers, to their ORIGINAL WMI safe harbored interests.

Get this..... One ISIN Number owned by WMIH CORP, is the MR COOPER (COOP) common shares. MR Cooper is truly not the parent. It is WMIH CORP.

Smoking Gun, for real!"

Yes no mention WMIH. But we are beneficiaries of a lot of trusts in those trust companies! I believe this is how we will get paid from those trusts. Interesting also I think getting a security exempts us of any tax liability.
Semper Fi

Synonymous!

I think you have to read it backwards

"Watch The Newco WMIH / COOP It Is The "Tell" ~



AZ said the above line the first time in 2018 and now he says it again in 2024


the first time in 2018'?, and now, for the ol' cactus 2024's 2nd time,



And this is only if you released as directed


for all those that Properly Released as Directed ?

There are a few key phrases in there: fraudulent convaence, Deutsche bank, bank of new York mellon,, and a similar interest rate. I don't know if it's directed at us or not, because nowhere is wmi/wmih mentioned.

Does short time equal to soon also? lol

New JPM bonds securities of Deutsche Bank Trusts from 2010. Here we go!

https://jpmorganchaseco.gcs-web.com/node/643911/html

He's an old cowboy admittedly

Yep..Im thinking we cross $80 within a short time from here...

Most posts are confusing...hieroglyphics.

JHD

This means if accumulated for 5 years this is appox. saving of 375 millions. From P sub. There must be sub for K as well.

I'm not Boris, lol but.... I think it was his punctuation that makes it confusing. I interpret it as 3 different actions (events).

or all those that Properly Released as Directed ?,

... the first time in 2018'?,

and now, for the ol' cactus 2024's

It looks weird being on the same line, but hey....I could be wrong in my interpretation.

New 52WH today, setting up an earnings run into the $80s if they perform, and release positive forward guidance.

Go $COOP!!

Not a bad day for COOP-OTIS , OI Cactus ur spines or thorns seems be puffed out lately these days lol
Oh ,no calculater need either 🥴😂

GoGooooooCOOP
Have a great evening people- Ts

Hey Boris, what’s AZ referring to when he talks about being properly released’ in 2018? Thanks in advance. I am released and w-9 signed and submitted btw.}Thanks

I didn't even know this stock existed back then.

LOL

We will be trading in the 80’s soon

Yeah baby…..for all those still holding Coop is the tell..

Mr. Cooper Group (NASDAQ:COOP - Free Report) had its target price increased by Jefferies Financial Group from $74.00 to $80.00

https://www.marketbeat.com/instant-alerts/nasdaq-coop-boost-price-target-2024-04-19/

Look Lodas, You break up the history of this process and then you show how in that small context there may or may not have been losses, endings, closings and depletings. In contrast there's a couple guys on this case who actually look at it's full context from beginning to end and really don't have any reason to believe you because of what they've seen and read.

You know I used to get excited enthusiastic looking forward to receiving large funds and even now I am completely devoid of those experiences 15 and 1/2 years later. I enjoy being excited the apprehension is half the fun. However apparently slightly apprehension is not a mature way to live life.

28 U.S.C. § 1715 - Notifications to Appropriate Federal and State Officials:

This section outlines the requirements for notifying relevant federal and state officials when a proposed settlement of a class action is filed in court.
The term “appropriate Federal official” refers to either the Attorney General of the United States or, in cases involving certain financial institutions, the person responsible for regulatory or supervisory matters related to the defendant.
Similarly, the “appropriate State official” is the individual in the state who holds primary regulatory or supervisory responsibility for the defendant or who licenses or authorizes the defendant to conduct business in the state.
The notice must include various components, such as copies of the complaint, details about scheduled judicial hearings, information on class members’ rights to request exclusion, proposed or final class action settlements, and any agreements between class counsel and defendants

THINGS START TO MOVE FOR REAL WE ARE NEXT In Re: Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation
Court Docket Sheet
Southern District of New York
1:2011-md-02262 (nysd)
Interested in this case?
Get Instant Updates
Documents
Last full update: 179 days ago. Update now
# Date Description
402104/20/2024MOTION for Disbursement of Funds AFTER DETERMINATION OF REASONABLE FEES DUE, IF ANY. Document filed by David Klusendorf. Return Date set for 5/6/2024 at 11:59 PM.
8 Attachments ?
402004/19/2024NOTICE of Compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1715(b). Document filed by The Norinchukin Bank. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:11-cv-02613-NRB.
401904/18/2024STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF PORTIGON AG AND WESTDEUTSCHE IMMOBILIENBANK AG PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(a)(ii): IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiffs and Defendants Portigon AG (f/k/a WestLB AG) ("Portigon") and Westdeutsche ImmobilienBank AG ("Westimmo") that all of Plaintiffs' claims against Portigon and Westlmmo only are hereby dismissed with prejudice from the action Triaxx Prime CDO 2006-1 ltd., et al. v. Bank of America Corporation, et al., No. 1:14-cv-000146-NRB (S.D.N.Y.), pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this stipulation of dismissal applies only to Portigon and Westlmmo, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. SO ORDERED. WestDeutsche Immobilienbank AG terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/18/2024)
401804/17/2024PROTECTIVE ORDER AND STIPULATION.regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/17/2024)
401704/16/2024NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by James Koutoulas on behalf of David Klusendorf.
401604/16/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ROYAL BANK OF CANADA PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A) (ii): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby dismiss all of their claims against Defendant Royal Bank of Canada ("Royal Bank") with prejudice from the action Triaxx Prime CDO 2006-1 Ltd. et al. v. Bank of America Corp. et al., 14-cv-00146-NRB (S.D.N.Y.), without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this voluntary dismissal applies only to Royal Bank, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. So ordered. Royal Bank of Canada and The Royal Bank of Canada terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/16/2024)
401504/16/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF LLOYD'S BANKING GROUP PLC PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby dismiss all of their claims against Defendant Lloyd's Banking Group PLC (collectively, "Lloyd's"), with prejudice from the action Triaxx Prime CDO 2006-1 Ltd. et al. v. Bank of America Corp. et al., 14-cv-00146-NRB (S.D.N.Y.), without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this voluntary dismissal applies only to Lloyd's, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. So ordered. Lloyds Banking Group Plc terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/16/2024)
401404/16/2024PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Document filed by FDIC, as receiver, Federal Deposit Insurance, The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver, The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.
04/12/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. (4013 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 884 in 1:11-cv-02613-NRB) Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:11-cv-02613-NRB (Text entry; no document attached.)
401304/11/2024PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by 303030 Trading LLC, 303030 Trading, LLC, Atlantic Trading USA, LLC, FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, FTC Futures Fund SICAV, Gary Francis, Gary Francis, Nathaniel Haynes, Metzler Investment GmbH. Related Document Number: [4009]. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.
401204/11/2024DECLARATION of Elaine Pang in Support re: (880 in 1:11-cv-02613-NRB) MOTION to Approve Preliminary Approval of Settlement with Credit Suisse AG, Lloyds Bank plc, Bank of Scotland plc, NatWest Markets plc, Portigon AG, Westdeutsche Immobilienbank AG, Royal Bank of Canada, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, Coperatieve Rabobank. Document filed by 303030 Trading LLC, 303030 Trading, LLC, Atlantic Trading USA, LLC, FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, FTC Futures Fund SICAV, Gary Francis, Gary Francis, Nathaniel Haynes, Metzler Investment GmbH. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:11-cv-02613-NRB.
11 Attachments ?
401104/11/2024DECLARATION of David E. Kovel in Support re: (880 in 1:11-cv-02613-NRB) MOTION to Approve Preliminary Approval of Settlement with Credit Suisse AG, Lloyds Bank plc, Bank of Scotland plc, NatWest Markets plc, Portigon AG, Westdeutsche Immobilienbank AG, Royal Bank of Canada, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, Coperatieve Rabobank. Document filed by 303030 Trading LLC, 303030 Trading, LLC, Atlantic Trading USA, LLC, FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, FTC Futures Fund SICAV, Gary Francis, Gary Francis, Nathaniel Haynes, Metzler Investment GmbH. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:11-cv-02613-NRB.
1 Attachment ?
401004/11/2024MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (880 in 1:11-cv-02613-NRB) MOTION to Approve Preliminary Approval of Settlement with Credit Suisse AG, Lloyds Bank plc, Bank of Scotland plc, NatWest Markets plc, Portigon AG, Westdeutsche Immobilienbank AG, Royal Bank of Canada, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, Coperatieve Rabobank. Document filed by 303030 Trading LLC, 303030 Trading, LLC, Atlantic Trading USA, LLC, FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, FTC Futures Fund SICAV, Gary Francis, Gary Francis, Nathaniel Haynes, Metzler Investment GmbH. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:11-cv-02613-NRB.
400904/11/2024MOTION to Approve Preliminary Approval of Settlement with Credit Suisse AG, Lloyds Bank plc, Bank of Scotland plc, NatWest Markets plc, Portigon AG, Westdeutsche Immobilienbank AG, Royal Bank of Canada, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, Coperatieve Rabobank U.A., The Norinchukin Bank, MUFG Bank, Ltd., and UBS AG. Document filed by 303030 Trading LLC, 303030 Trading, LLC, Atlantic Trading USA, LLC, FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, FTC Futures Fund SICAV, Gary Francis, Gary Francis, Nathaniel Haynes, Metzler Investment GmbH.Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:11-cv-02613-NRB.
400804/11/2024ORDER granting [4006] Letter Motion for Conference re: [4006] LETTER MOTION for Conference Regarding Preliminary Approval of Exchange-Based Plaintiffs' Settlement with Remaining Defendants addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from David E. Kovel and Christopher Lovell dated April 9, 2024. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file the proposed motion for preliminary approval of the settlement without the necessity of a pre-motion conference. So ordered. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/11/2024)
04/10/2024>>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. [4007] MOTION for Timothy S. Kearns to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29201011. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): expired Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Delaware and Supreme Court of DC;. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order. (Text entry; no document attached.)
04/10/2024>>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. [4007] MOTION for Timothy S. Kearns to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29201011. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): expired Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Delaware and Supreme Court of DC;. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order. (Text entry; no document attached.)
400704/10/2024MOTION for Timothy S. Kearns to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29201011. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore.
3 Attachments ?
400604/09/2024LETTER MOTION for Conference Regarding Preliminary Approval of Exchange-Based Plaintiffs' Settlement with Remaining Defendants addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from David E. Kovel and Christopher Lovell dated April 9, 2024. Document filed by 303030 Trading LLC, 303030 Trading, LLC, Atlantic Trading USA, LLC, FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, FTC Futures Fund SICAV, Gary Francis, Gary Francis, Nathaniel Haynes, Metzler Investment GmbH. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:11-cv-02613-NRB.
5 Attachments ?
400504/05/2024STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANTS CITIBANK, N.A. AND CITIGROUP INC. PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(i): IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiffs in the above-captioned actions and Defendants Citibank, N.A. and Citigroup Inc. that all of Plaintiffs' respective claims against Defendants Citibank, N.A. and Citigroup Inc. only are hereby dismissed with prejudice from the actions City of Houston v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05616; City of Richmond, et al. v. Bank of AmericaCorp., et al., No. 13-cv-00627; City of Riverside, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00597; County of Mendocino v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-08644; County of Sacramento v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05569; County of San Diego v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00667; County of San Mateo, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00625; County of Sonoma, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05187; East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00626; San Diego Association of Governments v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05221; and The Regents of the University
400404/05/2024MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting [4002] Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. So ordered. Attorney Elizabeth A Cassady terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/5/2024)
04/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [4003] Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
400304/04/2024STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Citibank NA, Citigroup Inc, Citibank, N.A. and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by California Public Plaintiffs, City Of Houston, City of Richmond, City of Riverside, County of Mendocino, County of Sacramento, County of San Diego, County of San Mateo, County of Sonoma, East Bay Municipal Utility District, San Diego Association of Governments, San Mateo Couty Joint Powers Financing Authority, Successor Agency to the Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency, David Sundstrom, The Regents of the University of California, The Richmond Joint Powers Financing Authority, The Riverside Public Financing Authority. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers).Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
400204/04/2024MOTION for Elizabeth A. Cassady to Withdraw as Attorney. Document filed by Portigon AG, WestDeutsche Immobilienbank AG.
400104/03/2024ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Counsel from NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE dated 4/3/2024 re: The Court is in receipt of the Direct Action and OTC Plaintiffs' letter of April 2, 2024. ENDORSEMENT: Dear Counsel: The Court is in receipt of the Direct Action and OTC Plaintiffs' letter of April 2, 2024. See ECF No. 4000. Of course, the Court has no interest in interfering with counsels' continuing cooperative efforts as reflected in the existing scheduling order and its prior iteration. However, regardless of counsels' efforts inter se, the Court considers fact discovery closed as of April 4, 2024. Further, as the Court has repeatedly made crystal clear, there cannot and will not be any further adjournments of the class certification, summary judgment, and Daubert motions. Very truly yours, NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/3/2024)
400004/02/2024LETTER MOTION for Conference to request approval from the Court to take a limited number of depositions following the close of fact discovery on April 4, 2024 addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from James R. Martin and William Christopher Carmody dated 4/2/2024. Document filed by FDIC, as receiver, Federal Deposit Insurance, The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver, The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.
399903/27/2024NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jenny Chenying Gu on behalf of Portigon AG, Portigon AG f/k/a WestLB AG, Portigon/WestLB AG, WestDeutsche Immobilienbank AG, WestLB AG, WestLB AG (n/k/a Portigon AG), Westdeutsche ImmobilienBank AG (n/k/a Westdeutsche Immobilien Servicing AG). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
399803/27/2024NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lisa C. Cohen on behalf of Portigon AG, Portigon AG f/k/a WestLB AG, Portigon/WestLB AG, WestDeutsche Immobilienbank AG, WestLB AG, WestLB AG (n/k/a Portigon AG), Westdeutsche ImmobilienBank AG (n/k/a Westdeutsche Immobilien Servicing AG). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
399703/27/2024NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Steven J. Fink on behalf of Portigon AG, Portigon AG f/k/a WestLB AG, Portigon/WestLB AG, WestDeutsche Immobilienbank AG, WestLB AG, WestLB AG (n/k/a Portigon AG), Westdeutsche ImmobilienBank AG (n/k/a Westdeutsche Immobilien Servicing AG). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
399603/15/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby dismiss all of their claims against Defendants Coperatieve Rabobank U.A. (f/k/a Coperatieve Centrale Raiffseisen-Boerenleenbank, B.A.) ("Rabobank"), HBOS plc ("HBOS"), Lloyds Banking Group plc ("Lloyds"), and PORTIGON AG (f/k/a WestLB AG) ("Portigon"), with prejudice from the actions City of Richmond, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv- 00627; City of Riverside, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00597; County of Mendocino v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-08644; County of Sacramento v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05569; County of San Diego v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00667; County of San Mateo, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00625; County of Sonoma, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05187; East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00626; San Diego Association of Governments v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05221; and The Regents of the University of California v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05186, without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to Rabobank, HBOS, Lloyds, and Portigon, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in these actions. So ordered. Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA (Rabobank), HBOS PLC, HBOS PLC, HBOS PLC, HBOS PLC, HBOS PLC, HBOS PLC (a United Kingdom Banking and Insurance Company), Lloyds Banking Group plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc (a United Kingdom Public Limited Company), Portigon AG, Portigon AG, Portigon AG (a German Joint Stock Company), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (a Netherlands Financial Services Provider) and Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank) terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/15/2024)
399503/15/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF THE NORINCHUKIN BANK PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby dismiss all of their respective claims against Defendant The Norinchukin Bank with prejudice from the actions City of Richmond, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00627; City of Riverside, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00597; County of Mendocino v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-08644; County of Sacramento v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05569; County of San Diego v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00667; County of San Mateo, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00625; County of Sonoma, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05187; East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00626; San Diego Association of Governments v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05221; and The Regents of the University of California v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05186, without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to The Norinchukin Bank, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in these actions. So ordered. The Norinchukin Bank, The Norinchukin Bank, The Norinchukin Bank, The Norinchukin Bank (a Japanese Bank), Norinchukin Bank and Norinchukin Bank terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/15/2024)
399403/15/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby dismisses all of its claims against Defendants Coperatieve Rabobank U.A. (f/k/a Coperatieve Centrale Raiffseisen-Boerenleenbank, B.A.) ("Rabobank"), HBOS plc ("HBOS"), Lloyds Banking Group plc ("Lloyds"), and PORTIGON AG (f/k/a WestLB AG) ("Portigon"), with prejudice from the action City of Houston v. Bank of America Corp., et al., 13-cv-05616-NRB (S.D.N.Y.) without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to Rabobank, HBOS, Lloyds, and Portigon, and Plaintiff is continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. So ordered. Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), HBOS PLC, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Portigon AG, Portigon AG, Portigon AG f/k/a WestLB AG, WestLB AG, WestLB AG (n/k/a Portigon AG), Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen Boerenleenbank B.A. (n/k/a Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A.) and Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/15/2024)
399303/15/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF THE NORINCHUKIN BANK, PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby dismisses all of its claims against Defendant The Norinchukin Bank with prejudice from the action City of Houston v. Bank of America Corp., et al., 13-cv-05616-NRB (S.D.N.Y.) without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to The Norunchukin Bank, and Plaintiff is continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. So ordered. The Norinchukin Bank terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/15/2024)
03/14/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [3992] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/14/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [3991] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/14/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [3990] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/14/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [3989] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/14/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [3992] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/14/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [3991] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/14/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [3989] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (Text entry; no document attached.)
399203/13/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) The Norinchukin Bank. Document filed by California Public Plaintiffs, City of Richmond, City of Riverside, County of Mendocino, County of Sacramento, County of San Diego, County of San Mateo, County of Sonoma, East Bay Municipal Utility District, San Diego Association of Governments, San Mateo Couty Joint Powers Financing Authority, Successor Agency to the Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency, David Sundstrom, The Regents of the University of California, The Richmond Joint Powers Financing Authority, The Riverside Public Financing Authority. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
399103/13/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) The Norinchukin Bank. Document filed by City Of Houston. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB.
399003/13/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Cooperative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boernleenbank B.A., HBOS plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc., Portigon AG. Document filed by California Public Plaintiffs, City of Richmond, City of Riverside, County of Mendocino, County of Sacramento, County of San Diego, County of San Mateo, County of Sonoma, East Bay Municipal Utility District, San Diego Association of Governments, San Mateo Couty Joint Powers Financing Authority, Successor Agency to the Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency, David Sundstrom, The Regents of the University of California, The Richmond Joint Powers Financing Authority, The Riverside Public Financing Authority. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
398903/13/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A., HBOS plc, Lloyds Banking Group plc, Portigon AG f/k/a WestLB AG. Document filed by City Of Houston. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB.
398803/06/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF SOCIETE GENERALE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) (A)(i), Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby dismisses all of its claims against Defendant Socit Gnrale ("SocGen") with prejudice from the action City of Houston v. Bank of America Corp., et al., 13-cv-05616-NRB (S.D.N.Y.) without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to SocGen, and Plaintiff is continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. So ordered. Societe Generale, S.A. terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/6/2024)
398703/06/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF MUFG BANK, LTD., F/K/A THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD., PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) (A)(i), Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby dismisses all of its claims against Defendant MUFG Bank, Ltd., f/k/a The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. ("MUFG"), with prejudice from the action City of Houston v. Bank of America Corp., et al., 13-cv-05616-NRB (S.D.N.Y.) without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to MUFG, and Plaintiff is continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. So ordered. Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/6/2024)
398603/06/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF MUFG BANK, LTD., F/K/A THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD., PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby dismiss all of their claims against Defendant MUFG Bank, Ltd., f/k/a The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. ("MUFG"), with prejudice from the actions City of Richmond, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00627; City of Riverside, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00597; County of Mendocino v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-08644; County of Sacramento v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05569; County of San Diego v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00667; County of San Mateo, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00625; County of Sonoma, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05187; East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00626; San Diego Association of Governments v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05221; and The Regents of the University of California v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05186, without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to MUFG, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in these actions. So ordered. Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd., Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd., Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd., Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd., Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. (a Japanese Company), Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd and Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/6/2024)
398503/06/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF SOCIETE GENERALE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby dismiss all of their respective claims against Defendant Socit Gnrale ("SocGen") with prejudice from the actions City of Richmond, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00627; City of Riverside, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00597; County of Mendocino v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-08644; County of Sacramento v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05569; County of San Diego v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00667; County of San Mateo, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00625; County of Sonoma, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05187; East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-00626; San Diego Association of Governments v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05221; and The Regents of the University of California v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 13-cv-05186, without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to SocGen, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in these actions. So ordered. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/6/2024)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (346 in 1:13-cv-05616-NRB, 3984 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (3983 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 345 in 1:13-cv-05616-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (314 in 1:13-cv-08644-NRB, 351 in 1:13-cv-00626-NRB, 337 in 1:13-cv-05186-NRB, 3982 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-00626-NRB, 1:13-cv-05186-NRB, 1:13-cv-08644-NRB. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (346 in 1:13-cv-05616-NRB, 3984 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (314 in 1:13-cv-08644-NRB, 351 in 1:13-cv-00626-NRB, 337 in 1:13-cv-05186-NRB, 3982 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-00626-NRB, 1:13-cv-05186-NRB, 1:13-cv-08644-NRB. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (3983 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 345 in 1:13-cv-05616-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (314 in 1:13-cv-08644-NRB, 351 in 1:13-cv-00626-NRB, 337 in 1:13-cv-05186-NRB, 3982 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-00626-NRB, 1:13-cv-05186-NRB, 1:13-cv-08644-NRB. (Text entry; no document attached.)
03/05/2024***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. (313 in 1:13-cv-08644-NRB, 351 in 1:13-cv-00625-NRB, 351 in 1:13-cv-00667-NRB, 335 in 1:13-cv-05569-NRB, 3981 in 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 336 in 1:13-cv-05186-NRB, 350 in 1:13-cv-00626-NRB, 335 in 1:13-cv-05221-NRB, 341 in 1:13-cv-05187-NRB, 352 in 1:13-cv-00597-NRB, 350 in 1:13-cv-00627-NRB) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al. (Text entry; no document attached.)
398403/04/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. Document filed by City Of Houston. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB.
398303/04/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Societe Generale S.A. Document filed by City Of Houston. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB, 1:13-cv-05616-NRB.
398203/04/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. Document filed by California Public Plaintiffs, City of Richmond, City of Riverside, County of Mendocino, County of Sacramento, County of San Diego, County of San Mateo, County of Sonoma, East Bay Municipal Utility District, San Diego Association of Governments, San Mateo Couty Joint Powers Financing Authority, Successor Agency to the Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency, David Sundstrom, The Regents of the University of California, The Richmond Joint Powers Financing Authority, The Riverside Public Financing Authority. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
398103/04/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Societe Generale. Document filed by California Public Plaintiffs, City of Richmond, City of Riverside, County of Mendocino, County of Sacramento, County of San Diego, County of San Mateo, County of Sonoma, East Bay Municipal Utility District, San Diego Association of Governments, San Mateo Couty Joint Powers Financing Authority, Successor Agency to the Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency, The Regents of the University of California, The Richmond Joint Powers Financing Authority, The Riverside Public Financing Authority. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02262-NRB et al.
398002/29/2024LETTER addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from Henninger S. Bullock dated February 29, 2024 re: [3976] Pre-Motion Letter. Document filed by Societe Generale.
397902/28/2024ORDER granting [3973] Motion for Anna Porter to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 2/28/2024)
397802/28/2024ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting [3977] Motion for Nicholas Murphy to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 2/28/2024)
02/27/2024>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. [3977] MOTION for Nicholas Murphy to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29001204. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (Text entry; no document attached.)
02/27/2024>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. [3977] MOTION for Nicholas Murphy to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29001204. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (Text entry; no document attached.)
397702/27/2024MOTION for Nicholas Murphy to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29001204. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore.
3 Attachments ?
397602/26/2024LETTER MOTION for Conference addressed to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald from Henninger S. Bullock dated February 26, 2024. Document filed by Societe Generale.
1 Attachment ?
397502/23/2024NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF SOCIETE GENERALE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby dismisses all of their claims against Defendant Societe Generale ("SocGen") with prejudice from the action Triaxx Prime CDO 2006-1 Ltd. et al. v. Bank of America Corp. et al., 14-cv-00146-NRB (S.D.N.Y.), without interest to any party and with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. For the avoidance of doubt, this notice of voluntary dismissal applies only to SocGen, and Plaintiffs are continuing to pursue claims against other Defendants in this action. So ordered. Societe Generale, S.A., Societe Generale S.A. and Societe Generale S.A. terminated. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 2/23/2024)
123456789?

👉COOP absolutely UNDERVALUED====>fair PPS is at least $200

Check COOP's current P/E ratio: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/COOP/key-statistics?p=COOP

COOP's trailing P/E is only: 10.63
COOP's forward P/E is only: 8.60

The P/E ratios in this list (data is as of January 2024)
Financial Svcs. (Non-bank & Insurance) covering 172 companies is the correct row:

http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/pedata.html

Financial Svcs. (Non-bank & Insurance)
The average P/Es are:
Current: 34.63
Trailing: 25.59
Forward: 25.54

So COOP's P/E is way too low and COOP is absolutely undervalued.
The PPS should be $200 at least, if not even $250+ considering the forward P/E in my opinion!

It is ok lodas……let him make his opinions as they only become true if money is distributed to all……

Yes….but your and many others predictions only become true if money arrives…..so far nothing has…..