UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30,
2015
OR
¨ | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the transition period from _______________
to __________________.
Commission File No. 0-13660
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in
its Charter)
Florida |
|
59-2260678 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or
Organization |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
815 COLORADO AVENUE, STUART FL |
|
34994 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(772) 287-4000 |
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of
“large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated |
Accelerated |
Non-Accelerated |
Small Reporting |
Filer ¨ |
Filer x |
Filer ¨ |
Company ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No x
Common Stock, $0.10 Par Value – 33,220,511
shares as of June 30, 2015
INDEX
SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida and Subsidiaries
| |
June 30, | | |
December 31, | |
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
ASSETS | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and due from banks | |
$ | 86,904 | | |
$ | 64,411 | |
Interest bearing deposits with other banks | |
| 7,844 | | |
| 36,128 | |
Total cash and cash equivalents | |
| 94,748 | | |
| 100,539 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Securities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Available for sale (at fair value) | |
| 762,086 | | |
| 741,375 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Held for investment (fair value:
$216,176 at June 30, 2015, and $208,788 at December 31, 2014) | |
| 214,777 | | |
| 207,904 | |
Total Securities | |
| 976,863 | | |
| 949,279 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Loans held for sale (at fair value) | |
| 19,656 | | |
| 12,078 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Loans | |
| 1,937,399 | | |
| 1,821,885 | |
Less: Allowance for loan losses | |
| (18,791 | ) | |
| (17,071 | ) |
NET LOANS | |
| 1,918,608 | | |
| 1,804,814 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Bank premises and equipment, net | |
| 50,028 | | |
| 45,086 | |
Other real estate owned | |
| 5,908 | | |
| 7,462 | |
Goodwill | |
| 25,211 | | |
| 25,309 | |
Other intangible assets, net | |
| 6,824 | | |
| 7,454 | |
Bank owned life insurance | |
| 36,291 | | |
| 35,679 | |
Other assets | |
| 99,451 | | |
| 105,635 | |
| |
$ | 3,233,588 | | |
$ | 3,093,335 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
LIABILITIES | |
| | | |
| | |
Deposits | |
$ | 2,605,177 | | |
$ | 2,416,534 | |
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, maturing within 30 days | |
| 172,676 | | |
| 233,640 | |
Borrowed funds | |
| 50,000 | | |
| 50,000 | |
Subordinated debt | |
| 64,670 | | |
| 64,583 | |
Other liabilities | |
| 14,209 | | |
| 15,927 | |
| |
| 2,906,732 | | |
| 2,780,684 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock, par value $0.10 per share, authorized 60,000,000 shares, issued 33,226,134 and outstanding 33,220,511 shares at June 30, 2015 and issued 33,143,202 and outstanding 33,136,592 shares at December 31, 2014 | |
| 3,300 | | |
| 3,300 | |
Other shareholders' equity | |
| 323,556 | | |
| 309,351 | |
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | |
| 326,856 | | |
| 312,651 | |
| |
$ | 3,233,588 | | |
$ | 3,093,335 | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida and Subsidiaries
| |
Three Months Ended | | |
Six months ended | |
| |
June 30, | | |
June 30, | |
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Interest and fees on loans | |
$ | 21,988 | | |
$ | 14,103 | | |
$ | 44,009 | | |
$ | 27,901 | |
Interest and dividends on securities | |
| 5,124 | | |
| 3,638 | | |
| 10,172 | | |
| 7,084 | |
Interest on interest bearing deposits and other investments | |
| 249 | | |
| 246 | | |
| 498 | | |
| 514 | |
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME | |
| 27,361 | | |
| 17,987 | | |
| 54,679 | | |
| 35,499 | |
Interest on deposits | |
| 845 | | |
| 570 | | |
| 1,593 | | |
| 1,171 | |
Interest on borrowed money | |
| 850 | | |
| 692 | | |
| 1,710 | | |
| 1,382 | |
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE | |
| 1,695 | | |
| 1,262 | | |
| 3,303 | | |
| 2,553 | |
NET INTEREST INCOME | |
| 25,666 | | |
| 16,725 | | |
| 51,376 | | |
| 32,946 | |
Provision (recapture) for loan losses | |
| 855 | | |
| (1,444 | ) | |
| 1,288 | | |
| (2,179 | ) |
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES | |
| 24,811 | | |
| 18,169 | | |
| 50,088 | | |
| 35,125 | |
Noninterest income | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Other income | |
| 8,846 | | |
| 5,896 | | |
| 16,154 | | |
| 11,454 | |
Securities gains, net (includes net gains of $0 and $1 in other comprehensive income reclassifications for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively) | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 17 | |
TOTAL NONINTEREST INCOME | |
| 8,846 | | |
| 5,896 | | |
| 16,154 | | |
| 11,471 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
TOTAL NONINTEREST EXPENSES | |
| 24,288 | | |
| 20,683 | | |
| 47,474 | | |
| 39,466 | |
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | |
| 9,369 | | |
| 3,382 | | |
| 18,768 | | |
| 7,130 | |
Provision for income taxes (includes $0 and $0 in income tax expense from reclassification items for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively) | |
| 3,564 | | |
| 1,464 | | |
| 7,104 | | |
| 2,913 | |
NET INCOME | |
$ | 5,805 | | |
$ | 1,918 | | |
$ | 11,664 | | |
$ | 4,217 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
PER SHARE COMMON STOCK: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net income diluted | |
$ | 0.18 | | |
$ | 0.07 | | |
$ | 0.35 | | |
$ | 0.16 | |
Net income basic | |
| 0.18 | | |
| 0.07 | | |
| 0.35 | | |
| 0.16 | |
Cash dividends declared | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 0.00 | |
Average shares outstanding - diluted | |
| 33,233,508 | | |
| 25,998,121 | | |
| 33,184,764 | | |
| 25,828,391 | |
Average shares outstanding - basic | |
| 32,978,006 | | |
| 25,826,825 | | |
| 32,971,670 | | |
| 25,659,159 | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida and Subsidiaries
| |
Three Months Ended | | |
Six Months Ended | |
| |
June 30, | | |
June 30, | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
NET INCOME | |
$ | 5,805 | | |
$ | 1,918 | | |
$ | 11,664 | | |
$ | 4,217 | |
Other comprehensive income: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for
sale | |
| (2,646 | ) | |
| 9,626 | | |
| 2,004 | | |
| 13,932 | |
Unrealized (losses) on securities that were transferred to securities held for investment, net | |
| 0 | | |
| (3,137 | ) | |
| 0 | | |
| (3,137 | ) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 1 | |
Provision for income taxes | |
| 1,022 | | |
| (2,505 | ) | |
| (774 | ) | |
| (4,168 | ) |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | |
$ | 4,181 | | |
$ | 5,902 | | |
$ | 12,894 | | |
$ | 10,845 | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida and Subsidiaries
| |
Six Months Ended | |
| |
June 30, | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest received | |
$ | 55,164 | | |
$ | 36,653 | |
Fees and commissions received | |
| 15,629 | | |
| 10,959 | |
Interest paid | |
| (3,587 | ) | |
| (2,573 | ) |
Cash paid to suppliers and employees | |
| (46,616 | ) | |
| (38,448 | ) |
Origination of loans held for sale | |
| (109,958 | ) | |
| (85,424 | ) |
Proceeds from loans held for sale | |
| 102,380 | | |
| 81,127 | |
Net change in other assets | |
| (462 | ) | |
| 484 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | |
| 12,550 | | |
| 2,778 | |
Cash flows from investing activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Maturity of securities available for sale | |
| 63,681 | | |
| 45,851 | |
Maturity of securities held for investment | |
| 17,400 | | |
| 2,270 | |
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale | |
| 0 | | |
| 4,061 | |
Purchase of securities available for sale | |
| (84,693 | ) | |
| (75,785 | ) |
Purchase of securities held for investment | |
| (24,366 | ) | |
| 0 | |
Net new loans and principal repayments | |
| (114,794 | ) | |
| (32,433 | ) |
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned | |
| 3,004 | | |
| 2,215 | |
Proceeds from sale of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and Federal Reserve Bank stock | |
| 3,725 | | |
| 600 | |
Purchase of FHLB and Federal Reserve Stock | |
| (3,388 | ) | |
| 0 | |
Additions to bank premises and equipment | |
| (6,651 | ) | |
| (1,713 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | |
| (146,082 | ) | |
| (54,934 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Net increase in deposits | |
| 188,643 | | |
| (508 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements | |
| (60,964 | ) | |
| (9,648 | ) |
Issuance of common stock, net of related expense | |
| 0 | | |
| 24,637 | |
Stock based employee benefit plans | |
| 62 | | |
| 81 | |
Dividends paid | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | |
| 127,741 | | |
| 14,562 | |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | |
| (5,791 | ) | |
| (37,594 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | |
| 100,539 | | |
| 191,624 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | |
$ | 94,748 | | |
$ | 154,030 | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
(Unaudited)
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida and Subsidiaries
| |
Six Months Ended | |
| |
June 30, | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Reconciliation of net income to cash provided by operating activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Net income | |
$ | 11,664 | | |
$ | 4,217 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Depreciation | |
| 1,708 | | |
| 1,576 | |
Amortization of premiums and discounts on securities, net | |
| 1,972 | | |
| 963 | |
Other amortization and accretion, net | |
| (994 | ) | |
| 545 | |
Change in loans held for sale, net | |
| (7,578 | ) | |
| (4,297 | ) |
Provision (recapture) for loan losses | |
| 1,288 | | |
| (2,179 | ) |
Gain on sale of securities | |
| 0 | | |
| (17 | ) |
Gain on sale of loans | |
| (708 | ) | |
| (668 | ) |
Losses on sale and write-downs of other real estate owned | |
| 134 | | |
| 145 | |
Losses (Gain) on disposition of fixed assets | |
| 1 | | |
| (10 | ) |
Change in interest receivable | |
| 136 | | |
| 38 | |
Change in interest payable | |
| (370 | ) | |
| (20 | ) |
Change in prepaid expenses | |
| (721 | ) | |
| (408 | ) |
Change in accrued taxes | |
| 7,487 | | |
| 3,150 | |
Change in other assets | |
| (462 | ) | |
| 484 | |
Change in other liabilities | |
| (1,007 | ) | |
| (741 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | |
$ | 12,550 | | |
$ | 2,778 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental disclosure of non cash investing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Fair value adjustment to securities | |
$ | 2,004 | | |
$ | 13,895 | |
Transfer from loans to other real estate owned | |
| 1,629 | | |
| 1,658 | |
Matured securities recorded as a receivable | |
| 528 | | |
| 372 | |
Transfer from securities available for sale to securities held for investment | |
| 0 | | |
| 158,781 | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida and Subsidiaries
NOTE A — BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by U. S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have
been included. Operating results for the six-month period ended June 30, 2015, are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015 or any other period. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of these condensed consolidated
financial statements required the use of certain estimates by management in determining the Company’s assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Specific areas, among others, requiring
the application of management’s estimates include determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of investment
securities available for sale, fair value of impaired loans, contingent liabilities, fair value of other real estate owned, and
the valuation of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
NOTE B — RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS, Not adopted as of June 30, 2015
The Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09. The ASU is a converged standard between the FASB and the IASB that
provides a single comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers across transactions and industries.
The primary objective of the ASU is revenue recognition that represents the transfer of promised goods or services to customers
in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
The ASU is effective on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted January 1, 2017. The Company is currently assessing the
impact of adoption of ASU 2014-09.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02.
The amendments in this update modify the requirements of consolidation with respect to entities that are or are similar in nature
to limited partnerships or are variable interest entities (VIEs). For entities that are or are similar to limited partnerships,
the guidance clarifies the evaluation of kick-out rights, removes the presumption that the general partner will consolidate and
generally states that such entities will be presumed to be VIEs unless proven otherwise. For VIEs, the guidance modifies the analysis
related to the evaluation of servicing fees, excludes servicing fees that are deemed commensurate with the level of service required
from the determination of the primary beneficiary and clarifies certain considerations related to the consolidation analysis when
performing a related party assessment. The amendments are effective for us on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The
amendments can be applied either through a full retrospective application or on a modified retrospective basis with a cumulative
effect adjustment on the date of initial adoption. Management is assessing the impact of the adoption of this guidance.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03.
The amendments in this update require that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the
carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. Currently debt issuance costs are presented as a deferred
charge and are therefore presented as an asset. The recognition and measurement requirements will not change as a result of this
guidance. The amendments are effective for us on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The amendments must be applied
with retrospective application, with each balance sheet period presented showing the impacts of applying the guidance. As the guidance
only impacts the balance sheet location of the debt discount, the guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
NOTE C — BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON
SHARE
For each of the periods ended June 30,
2015 and 2014, options and warrants to purchase 282,000 and 302,000 shares, respectively, were antidilutive and accordingly were
excluded in determining diluted earnings per share.
| |
Three Months Ended | | |
Six Months Ended | |
| |
June 30, | | |
June 30, | |
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Basic: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net income available to common shareholders | |
$ | 5,805 | | |
$ | 1,918 | | |
$ | 11,664 | | |
$ | 4,217 | |
Average basic shares outstanding | |
| 32,978,006 | | |
| 25,826,825 | | |
| 32,971,670 | | |
| 25,659,159 | |
Basic earnings per share | |
$ | 0.18 | | |
$ | 0.07 | | |
$ | 0.35 | | |
$ | 0.16 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Diluted: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net income available to common shareholders | |
$ | 5,805 | | |
$ | 1,918 | | |
$ | 11,664 | | |
$ | 4,217 | |
Average basic shares outstanding | |
| 32,978,006 | | |
| 25,826,825 | | |
| 32,971,670 | | |
| 25,659,159 | |
Restricted stock awards | |
| 255,502 | | |
| 171,296 | | |
| 213,094 | | |
| 169,232 | |
Average diluted shares outstanding | |
| 33,233,508 | | |
| 25,998,121 | | |
| 33,184,764 | | |
| 25,828,391 | |
Diluted earnings per share | |
$ | 0.18 | | |
$ | 0.07 | | |
$ | 0.35 | | |
$ | 0.16 | |
NOTE D — SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of securities
available for sale and held for investment at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are summarized as follows:
| |
June 30, 2015 | |
| |
Gross | | |
Gross | | |
Gross | | |
| |
| |
Amortized | | |
Unrealized | | |
Unrealized | | |
Fair | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Cost | | |
Gains | | |
Losses | | |
Value | |
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
$ | 3,775 | | |
$ | 68 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 3,843 | |
Mortgage-backed securities of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
| 121,924 | | |
| 1,531 | | |
| (758 | ) | |
| 122,697 | |
Collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
| 313,082 | | |
| 989 | | |
| (4,497 | ) | |
| 309,574 | |
Private mortgage backed securities | |
| 124,462 | | |
| 253 | | |
| (474 | ) | |
| 124,241 | |
Private collateralized mortgage obligations | |
| 32,448 | | |
| 32 | | |
| (304 | ) | |
| 32,176 | |
Collateralized loan obligations | |
| 94,260 | | |
| 841 | | |
| (987 | ) | |
| 94,114 | |
Obligations of state and political subdivisions | |
| 22,636 | | |
| 513 | | |
| (276 | ) | |
| 22,873 | |
Corporate and other debt securities | |
| 32,171 | | |
| 21 | | |
| (211 | ) | |
| 31,981 | |
Private commercial mortgage backed securities | |
| 20,632 | | |
| 12 | | |
| (57 | ) | |
| 20,587 | |
| |
$ | 765,390 | | |
$ | 4,260 | | |
$ | (7,564 | ) | |
$ | 762,086 | |
SECURITIES HELD FOR INVESTMENT | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mortgage-backed securities of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
$ | 66,056 | | |
$ | 708 | | |
$ | (24 | ) | |
$ | 66,740 | |
Collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
| 98,857 | | |
| 751 | | |
| (307 | ) | |
| 99,301 | |
Collateralized loan obligations | |
| 41,300 | | |
| 371 | | |
| (100 | ) | |
| 41,571 | |
Private collateralized mortgage obligations | |
| 8,564 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 8,564 | |
Other | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | |
| |
$ | 214,777 | | |
$ | 1,830 | | |
$ | (431 | ) | |
$ | 216,176 | |
| |
December 31, 2014 | |
| |
Gross | | |
Gross | | |
Gross | | |
| |
| |
Amortized | | |
Unrealized | | |
Unrealized | | |
Fair | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Cost | | |
Gains | | |
Losses | | |
Value | |
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
$ | 3,876 | | |
$ | 23 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 3,899 | |
Mortgage-backed securities of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
| 123,981 | | |
| 1,501 | | |
| (423 | ) | |
| 125,059 | |
Collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
| 352,483 | | |
| 1,075 | | |
| (6,077 | ) | |
| 347,481 | |
Private mortgage backed securities | |
| 29,967 | | |
| 291 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 30,258 | |
Private collateralized mortgage obligations | |
| 85,175 | | |
| 688 | | |
| (728 | ) | |
| 85,135 | |
Collateralized loan obligations | |
| 127,397 | | |
| 0 | | |
| (2,172 | ) | |
| 125,225 | |
Obligations of state and political subdivisions | |
| 23,511 | | |
| 810 | | |
| (3 | ) | |
| 24,318 | |
| |
$ | 746,390 | | |
$ | 4,388 | | |
$ | (9,403 | ) | |
$ | 741,375 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
SECURITIES HELD FOR INVESTMENT | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mortgage-backed securities of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
$ | 67,535 | | |
$ | 812 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 68,347 | |
Collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
| 114,541 | | |
| 695 | | |
| (280 | ) | |
| 114,956 | |
Collateralized loan obligations | |
| 25,828 | | |
| 0 | | |
| (343 | ) | |
| 25,485 | |
| |
$ | 207,904 | | |
$ | 1,507 | | |
$ | (623 | ) | |
$ | 208,788 | |
No sales of securities during the six month
period ended June 30, 2015 were transacted. Proceeds from sales of securities during the six month period ended June 30, 2014 were
$4.1 million with gross gains of $17,000 and no gross losses.
On May 31, 2014 management identified $158.8
million of investment securities available for sale and transferred them into held for investment. The unrealized holding losses
at the date of transfer totaled $3.1 million.
For those securities that were transferred
into the held for investment category from the available for sale category, the unrealized holding losses at the date of the transfer
will continue to be reported in other comprehensive income, and will be amortized over the remaining life of the security as an
adjustment of yield in a manner consistent with the amortization of a discount. The amortization of unrealized holding losses reported
in equity will offset the effect on interest income of the amortization of the discount.
Securities at June 30, 2015 with a carrying
and fair value of $188.3 million and $187.7 million, respectively, were pledged as collateral for other public and trust deposits. Securities with a carrying value and fair value of $157.7
million, were pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements.
The amortized cost and fair value of securities
at June 30, 2015, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because
borrowers may have the right to call or repay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
| |
Held for Investment | | |
Available for Sale | |
| |
Amortized | | |
Fair | | |
Amortized | | |
Fair | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Cost | | |
Value | | |
Cost | | |
Value | |
Due in less than one year | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 100 | | |
$ | 100 | |
Due after one year through five years | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 40,148 | | |
| 39,967 | |
Due after five years through ten years | |
| 41,300 | | |
| 41,571 | | |
| 101,984 | | |
| 101,896 | |
Due after ten years | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 8,641 | | |
| 8,994 | |
| |
| 41,300 | | |
| 41,571 | | |
| 150,873 | | |
| 150,957 | |
Mortgage-backed securities of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
| 66,056 | | |
| 66,740 | | |
| 121,924 | | |
| 122,697 | |
Collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
| 98,857 | | |
| 99,301 | | |
| 313,082 | | |
| 309,574 | |
Private mortgage backed securities | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 32,448 | | |
| 32,176 | |
Private collateralized mortgage obligations | |
| 8,564 | | |
| 8,564 | | |
| 94,260 | | |
| 94,114 | |
Corporate and other debt securities | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 32,171 | | |
| 31,981 | |
Private commercial mortgage backed securities | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 20,632 | | |
| 20,587 | |
| |
$ | 214,777 | | |
$ | 216,176 | | |
$ | 765,390 | | |
$ | 762,086 | |
The estimated fair value of a security
is determined based on market quotations when available or, if not available, by using quoted market prices for similar securities,
pricing models or discounted cash flows analyses, using observable market data where available. The tables below indicate the amount
of securities with unrealized losses and period of time for which these losses were outstanding at June 30, 2015 and December 31,
2014, respectively.
| |
June
30, 2015 | |
| |
Less
than 12 months | | |
12
months or longer | | |
Total | |
| |
Fair | | |
Unrealized | | |
Fair | | |
Unrealized | | |
Fair | | |
Unrealized | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Value | | |
Losses | | |
Value | | |
Losses | | |
Value | | |
Losses | |
Mortgage-backed
securties of U.S. Governement Sponsored Entities | |
$ | 71,485 | | |
$ | (581 | ) | |
$ | 9,516 | | |
$ | (201 | ) | |
$ | 81,001 | | |
$ | (782 | ) |
Collateralized
mortgage obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
| 91,107 | | |
| (732 | ) | |
| 150,895 | | |
| (4,072 | ) | |
| 242,002 | | |
| (4,804 | ) |
Private
mortage backed securities | |
| 16,677 | | |
| (304 | ) | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 16,677 | | |
| (304 | ) |
Private
collaterlized mortgage obligations | |
| 46,084 | | |
| (730 | ) | |
| 14,788 | | |
| (257 | ) | |
| 60,872 | | |
| (987 | ) |
Collateralized
loan obligations | |
| 37,325 | | |
| (291 | ) | |
| 24,635 | | |
| (283 | ) | |
| 61,960 | | |
| (574 | ) |
Obligations
of state and political subdivisions | |
| 13,256 | | |
| (276 | ) | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 13,256 | | |
| (276 | ) |
Corporate
and other debt securities | |
| 21,276 | | |
| (211 | ) | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 21,276 | | |
| (211 | ) |
Private
commercial mortgage backed securities | |
| 13,644 | | |
| (57 | ) | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 13,644 | | |
| (57 | ) |
Total
temporarily impaired securities | |
$ | 310,854 | | |
$ | (3,182 | ) | |
$ | 199,834 | | |
$ | (4,813 | ) | |
$ | 510,688 | | |
$ | (7,995 | ) |
| |
December
31, 2014 | |
| |
Less
than 12 months | | |
12
months or longer | | |
Total | |
| |
Fair | | |
Unrealized | | |
Fair | | |
Unrealized | | |
Fair | | |
Unrealized | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Value | | |
Losses | | |
Value | | |
Losses | | |
Value | | |
Losses | |
U.S.
Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
$ | 100 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 100 | | |
$ | 0 | |
Mortgage-backed
securties of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
| 36,890 | | |
| (153 | ) | |
| 21,640 | | |
| (271 | ) | |
| 58,530 | | |
| (424 | ) |
Collateralized
mortgage obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
| 100,148 | | |
| (833 | ) | |
| 170,400 | | |
| (5,523 | ) | |
| 270,548 | | |
| (6,356 | ) |
Private
collaterlized mortgage obligations | |
| 61,554 | | |
| (914 | ) | |
| 10,091 | | |
| (157 | ) | |
| 71,645 | | |
| (1,071 | ) |
Collateralized
loan obligations | |
| 100,714 | | |
| (1,769 | ) | |
| 24,511 | | |
| (403 | ) | |
| 125,225 | | |
| (2,172 | ) |
Obligations
of state and political subdivisions | |
| 1,734 | | |
| (3 | ) | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 1,734 | | |
| (3 | ) |
Total
temporarily impaired securities | |
$ | 301,040 | | |
$ | (3,672 | ) | |
$ | 226,642 | | |
$ | (6,354 | ) | |
$ | 527,682 | | |
$ | (10,026 | ) |
At June 30, 2015, approximately $1.3 million
of the unrealized losses pertain to private label securities secured by collateral originated in 2005 and prior. Their fair value
is $77.5 million and is attributable to a combination of factors, including relative changes in interest rates since the time
of purchase. The collateral underlying these mortgage investments are 30- and 15-year fixed and 10/1 adjustable rate mortgage
loans with low loan to values and subordination. Based on its assessment of these securities, management believes that the unrealized
losses on these debt security holdings are a function of changes in investment spreads and interest rate movements and not changes
in credit quality. Management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.
At June 30, 2015, the Company also
had $5.6 million of unrealized losses on collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage backed securities of government sponsored
entities having a fair value of $323.0 million that were attributable to a combination of factors, including relative changes
in interest rates since the time of purchase. The contractual cash flows for these securities are guaranteed by U.S. government
agencies and U.S. government-sponsored enterprises. Based on its assessment of these factors, management believes that the unrealized
losses on these debt security holdings are a function of changes in investment spreads and interest movements and not changes
in credit quality. Management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.
At June 30, 2015, the Company also
had $0.6 million of unrealized losses on collateralized loan obligations having a fair value of $62.0 million that were attributable
to a combination of factors, including relative changes in interest rates since the time of purchase. Based on its assessment
of these factors, management believes that the unrealized losses on these debt security holdings are a function of changes in
investment spreads and interest movements and not changes in credit quality. Management expects to recover the entire amortized
cost basis of these securities.
Also, as of June 30, 2015, management
does not intend to sell securities that are in unrealized loss positions and it is not more likely than not that the Company will
be required to sell these securities before recovery of the amortized cost basis. Therefore, management does not consider any investment
to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2015.
Included in other assets is $16.0
million of Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock stated at par value. At June 30, 2015, the Company has
not identified events or changes in circumstances which may have a significant adverse effect on the carrying value of the
$16.0 million of cost method investment securities.
NOTE E — LOANS
Information relating to portfolio loans,
purchased credit impaired (PCI), and purchased unimpaired loans (PUL) is summarized as follows:
June 30, 2015 | |
Portfolio Loans | | |
PCI Loans | | |
PUL's | | |
Total | |
| |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Construction and land development | |
$ | 79,644 | | |
$ | 1,489 | | |
$ | 14,045 | | |
$ | 95,178 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 693,212 | | |
| 3,350 | | |
| 195,766 | | |
| 892,328 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 657,247 | | |
| 506 | | |
| 38,024 | | |
| 695,777 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 153,455 | | |
| 1,217 | | |
| 35,653 | | |
| 190,325 | |
Consumer | |
| 61,423 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 1,490 | | |
| 62,913 | |
Other loans | |
| 878 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 878 | |
NET LOAN BALANCES | |
$ | 1,645,859 | | |
$ | 6,562 | | |
$ | 284,978 | | |
$ | 1,937,399 | |
December 31, 2014 | |
Portfolio Loans | | |
PCI Loans | | |
PUL's | | |
Total | |
| |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Construction and land development | |
$ | 65,896 | | |
$ | 1,557 | | |
$ | 19,583 | | |
$ | 87,036 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 610,863 | | |
| 4,092 | | |
| 222,192 | | |
| 837,147 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 639,428 | | |
| 851 | | |
| 46,618 | | |
| 686,897 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 120,763 | | |
| 1,312 | | |
| 35,321 | | |
| 157,396 | |
Consumer | |
| 50,543 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 2,352 | | |
| 52,897 | |
Other loans | |
| 512 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 512 | |
NET LOAN BALANCES | |
$ | 1,488,005 | | |
$ | 7,814 | | |
$ | 326,066 | | |
$ | 1,821,885 | |
Net loan balances as of June 30, 2015
and December 31, 2014 are net of deferred costs of $6.2 million and $3.6 million for each period, respectively.
Purchased Loans - PCI loans
are accounted for pursuant to ASC Topic 310-30. The excess of cash flows expected to be collected over the estimated fair value
is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income over the remaining life of the loan in situations where
there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. The difference between the
contractually required payments and the cash flows expected to be collected, considering the impact of prepayments, is referred
to as the nonaccretable difference.
We have applied ASC Topic 310-20
accounting treatment to PULs. The unamortized fair value mark established at acquisition on the loans has been ascribed as an
accretable yield that is accreted into interest income over the estimated remaining life of the loans.
The table below summarizes the changes
in total contractually required principal and interest cash payments, management’s estimate of expected total cash payments
and carrying value of PCI loans during the six month period ending June 30, 2015. Contractually required principal and interest
payments have been adjusted for estimated prepayments.
| |
December 31, 2014 | | |
Deletions | | |
Accretion | | |
Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference | | |
June 30, 2015 | |
| |
(In thousands) | |
Contractually required principal and interest | |
$ | 14,831 | | |
$ | (3,267 | ) | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 11,564 | |
Nonaccretable difference | |
| (5,825 | ) | |
| 1,663 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 261 | | |
| (3,901 | ) |
Cash flows expected to be collected | |
| 9,006 | | |
| (1,604 | ) | |
| 0 | | |
| 261 | | |
| 7,663 | |
Accretable yield | |
| (1,192 | ) | |
| 148 | | |
| 204 | | |
| (261 | ) | |
| (1,101 | ) |
Carrying value of acquired loans | |
| 7,814 | | |
$ | (1,456 | ) | |
$ | 204 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
| 6,562 | |
Allowance for loan losses | |
| (64 | ) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| (212 | ) |
Carrying value less allowance for loan losses | |
$ | 7,750 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
$ | 6,350 | |
The following table presents the contractual
aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class of loans as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
| |
| | |
| | |
Accruing | | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
Accruing | | |
Accruing | | |
Greater | | |
| | |
| | |
Total | |
June 30, 2015 | |
30-59 Days | | |
60-89 Days | | |
Than | | |
| | |
| | |
Financing | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Past Due | | |
Past Due | | |
90 Days | | |
Nonaccrual | | |
Current | | |
Receivables | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Portfolio Loans | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction and land development | |
$ | 48 | | |
$ | 525 | | |
$ | 41 | | |
$ | 303 | | |
$ | 78,728 | | |
$ | 79,645 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 603 | | |
| 54 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 2,483 | | |
| 690,070 | | |
| 693,210 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 619 | | |
| 211 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 12,035 | | |
| 644,382 | | |
| 657,247 | |
Commerical and financial | |
| 22 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 153,434 | | |
| 153,456 | |
Consumer | |
| 67 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 233 | | |
| 61,123 | | |
| 61,423 | |
Other | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 878 | | |
| 878 | |
Total | |
| 1,359 | | |
| 790 | | |
| 41 | | |
| 15,054 | | |
| 1,628,615 | | |
$ | 1,645,859 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Purchased Unimpaired Loans | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction and land development | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 43 | | |
| 14,001 | | |
$ | 14,044 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 409 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 2,215 | | |
| 193,144 | | |
| 195,768 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 6 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 29 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 37,989 | | |
| 38,024 | |
Commerical and financial | |
| 20 | | |
| 135 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 35,497 | | |
| 35,652 | |
Consumer | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 1,490 | | |
| 1,490 | |
Other | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | |
Total | |
| 435 | | |
| 135 | | |
| 29 | | |
| 2,258 | | |
| 282,121 | | |
$ | 284,978 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Purchased Credit Impaired Loans | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction and land development | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 1,367 | | |
| 122 | | |
$ | 1,489 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 724 | | |
| 2,626 | | |
| 3,350 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 194 | | |
| 312 | | |
| 506 | |
Commerical and financial | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 1,217 | | |
| 1,217 | |
Consumer | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | |
Other | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | |
Total | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 2,285 | | |
| 4,277 | | |
$ | 6,562 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total Loans | |
$ | 1,794 | | |
$ | 925 | | |
$ | 70 | | |
$ | 19,597 | | |
$ | 1,915,013 | | |
$ | 1,937,399 | |
| |
| | |
| | |
Accruing | | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
Accruing | | |
Accruing | | |
Greater | | |
| | |
| | |
Total | |
December 31, 2014 | |
30-59 Days | | |
60-89 Days | | |
Than | | |
| | |
| | |
Financing | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Past Due | | |
Past Due | | |
90 Days | | |
Nonaccrual | | |
Current | | |
Receivables | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Portfolio Loans | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction and land development | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 534 | | |
$ | 65,362 | | |
$ | 65,896 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 764 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 3,457 | | |
| 606,642 | | |
| 610,863 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 259 | | |
| 159 | | |
| 17 | | |
| 14,381 | | |
| 624,612 | | |
| 639,428 | |
Commerical and financial | |
| 232 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 120,531 | | |
| 120,763 | |
Consumer | |
| 256 | | |
| 25 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 191 | | |
| 50,071 | | |
| 50,543 | |
Other | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 512 | | |
| 512 | |
Total | |
$ | 1,511 | | |
$ | 184 | | |
$ | 17 | | |
$ | 18,563 | | |
$ | 1,467,730 | | |
$ | 1,488,005 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Purchased Unimpaired Loans | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction and land development | |
$ | 303 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 19,280 | | |
$ | 19,583 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 2,318 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 41 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 219,833 | | |
| 222,192 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 142 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 39 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 46,432 | | |
| 46,618 | |
Commerical and financial | |
| 953 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 34,368 | | |
| 35,321 | |
Consumer | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 2,352 | | |
| 2,352 | |
Other | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | |
Total | |
$ | 3,716 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 80 | | |
$ | 5 | | |
$ | 322,265 | | |
$ | 326,066 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Purchased Impaired Loans | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction and land development | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 1,428 | | |
$ | 129 | | |
$ | 1,557 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 7 | | |
| 359 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 733 | | |
| 2,993 | | |
| 4,092 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 88 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 116 | | |
| 411 | | |
| 236 | | |
| 851 | |
Commerical and financial | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 1,312 | | |
| 1,312 | |
Consumer | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 2 | |
Other | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | |
Total | |
$ | 95 | | |
$ | 359 | | |
$ | 116 | | |
$ | 2,572 | | |
$ | 4,672 | | |
$ | 7,814 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total Loans | |
$ | 5,322 | | |
$ | 543 | | |
$ | 213 | | |
$ | 21,140 | | |
$ | 1,794,667 | | |
$ | 1,821,885 | |
The Company utilizes an internal
asset classification system as a means of reporting problem and potential problem loans. Under the Company’s risk
rating system, the Company classifies problem and potential problem loans as “Special Mention,”
“Substandard,” and “Doubtful” and these loans are monitored on an ongoing basis. Substandard
loans include those characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are
not corrected. Loans classified as Doubtful, have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified Substandard with the
added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing
facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. The principal balance of loans classified as doubtful
are generally charged off. Loans that do not currently expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one
of the aforementioned categories, but possess weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention are deemed to be
Special Mention. Risk ratings are updated any time the situation warrants.
Loans not meeting the criteria above are
considered to be pass-rated loans and risk grades are recalculated at least annually by the loan relationship manager. The
following tables present the risk category of loans by class of loans based on the most recent analysis performed as of June 30,
2015 and December 31, 2014:
June 30, 2015 | |
| |
| |
Construction | | |
| | |
| | |
Commercial | | |
| | |
| |
| |
& Land | | |
Commercial | | |
Residential | | |
and | | |
Consumer | | |
| |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Development | | |
Real Estate | | |
Real Estate | | |
Financial | | |
Loans | | |
Total | |
Pass | |
$ | 84,789 | | |
$ | 855,600 | | |
$ | 667,063 | | |
$ | 188,446 | | |
$ | 62,113 | | |
$ | 1,858,011 | |
Special mention | |
| 3,640 | | |
| 11,570 | | |
| 1,112 | | |
| 906 | | |
| 886 | | |
| 18,114 | |
Substandard | |
| 2,712 | | |
| 12,445 | | |
| 2,065 | | |
| 858 | | |
| 156 | | |
| 18,236 | |
Doubtful | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | |
Nonaccrual | |
| 1,713 | | |
| 5,422 | | |
| 12,229 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 233 | | |
| 19,597 | |
Pass-Troubled debt restructures | |
| 1,949 | | |
| 1,788 | | |
| 36 | | |
| 18 | | |
| 403 | | |
| 4,194 | |
Troubled debt restructures | |
| 375 | | |
| 5,503 | | |
| 13,272 | | |
| 97 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 19,247 | |
| |
$ | 95,178 | | |
$ | 892,328 | | |
$ | 695,777 | | |
$ | 190,325 | | |
$ | 63,791 | | |
$ | 1,937,399 | |
December 31, 2014 | |
| |
| |
Construction | | |
| | |
| | |
Commercial | | |
| | |
| |
| |
& Land | | |
Commercial | | |
Residential | | |
and | | |
Consumer | | |
| |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Development | | |
Real Estate | | |
Real Estate | | |
Financial | | |
Loans | | |
Total | |
Pass | |
$ | 79,397 | | |
$ | 797,934 | | |
$ | 655,518 | | |
$ | 155,281 | | |
$ | 51,764 | | |
$ | 1,739,894 | |
Special mention | |
| 1,815 | | |
| 11,709 | | |
| 546 | | |
| 993 | | |
| 590 | | |
| 15,653 | |
Substandard | |
| 1,685 | | |
| 15,325 | | |
| 1,733 | | |
| 1,002 | | |
| 456 | | |
| 20,201 | |
Doubtful | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | |
Nonaccrual | |
| 1,963 | | |
| 4,189 | | |
| 14,797 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 191 | | |
| 21,140 | |
Pass-Troubled debt restructures | |
| 1,672 | | |
| 2,332 | | |
| 17 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 4,021 | |
Troubled debt restructures | |
| 504 | | |
| 5,658 | | |
| 14,286 | | |
| 120 | | |
| 408 | | |
| 20,976 | |
| |
$ | 87,036 | | |
$ | 837,147 | | |
$ | 686,897 | | |
$ | 157,396 | | |
$ | 53,409 | | |
$ | 1,821,885 | |
NOTE F — IMPAIRED LOANS AND ALLOWANCE
FOR LOAN LOSSES
During the six months ending June 30, 2015
and 2014, newly identified troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) totaled $0.9 million and $5.3 million, respectively.
Loans that are modified, but where full collection under the modified terms is doubtful are classified as nonaccrual loans from
the date of modification.
The Company’s TDR concessions granted
generally do not include forgiveness of principal balances. Loan modifications are not reported in calendar years after modification
if the loans were modified at an interest rate equal to the yields of new loan originations with comparable risk and the loans
are performing based on the terms of the restructuring agreements.
When a loan is modified as a TDR, there
is not a direct, material impact on the loans within the Consolidated Balance Sheet, as principal balances are generally not forgiven.
Most loans prior to modification were classified as an impaired loan and the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance
with Company policy.
The following table presents loans that
were modified within the six months ending June 30, 2015:
| |
| | |
Pre- | | |
Post- | | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Modification | | |
Modification | | |
| | |
| |
| |
Number | | |
Outstanding | | |
Outstanding | | |
Specific | | |
Valuation | |
| |
of | | |
Recorded | | |
Recorded | | |
Reserve | | |
Allowance | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Contracts | | |
Investment | | |
Investment | | |
Recorded | | |
Recorded | |
Residential real estate | |
| 1 | | |
$ | 26 | | |
$ | 25 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 1 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 2 | | |
| 911 | | |
| 859 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 52 | |
Consumer | |
| 1 | | |
| 48 | | |
| 45 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 3 | |
| |
| 4 | | |
$ | 985 | | |
$ | 929 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 56 | |
The following table presents loans that were modified within
the six months ending June 30, 2014:
| |
| | |
Pre- | | |
Post- | | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Modification | | |
Modification | | |
| | |
| |
| |
Number | | |
Outstanding | | |
Outstanding | | |
Specific | | |
Valuation | |
| |
of | | |
Recorded | | |
Recorded | | |
Reserve | | |
Allowance | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Contracts | | |
Investment | | |
Investment | | |
Recorded | | |
Recorded | |
Residential real estate | |
| 3 | | |
$ | 601 | | |
$ | 564 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 37 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 1 | | |
| 4,300 | | |
| 3,975 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 325 | |
| |
| 4 | | |
$ | 4,901 | | |
$ | 4,539 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 362 | |
No accruing loans that were restructured
within the twelve months preceding June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, defaulted during the six months ended June 30, 2015
and 2014, respectively. The Company considers a loan to have defaulted when it becomes 60 days or more delinquent under the modified
terms, has been transferred to nonaccrual status, or has been transferred to other real estate owned. A defaulted TDR is generally
placed on nonaccrual and specific allowance for loan loss is assigned in accordance with the Company’s policy.
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014,
the Company’s recorded investment in impaired loans and the related valuation allowance were as follows:
| |
June 30, 2015 | |
| |
| | |
Unpaid | | |
Related | |
| |
Recorded | | |
Principal | | |
Valuation | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Investment | | |
Balance | | |
Allowance | |
Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction and land development | |
$ | 1,762 | | |
$ | 2,070 | | |
$ | 0 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 3,434 | | |
| 4,804 | | |
| 0 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 10,264 | | |
| 14,500 | | |
| 0 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 115 | | |
| 115 | | |
| 0 | |
Consumer | |
| 156 | | |
| 214 | | |
| 0 | |
Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction and land development | |
| 905 | | |
| 935 | | |
| 142 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 6,341 | | |
| 6,414 | | |
| 417 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 15,078 | | |
| 15,455 | | |
| 2,483 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | |
Consumer | |
| 480 | | |
| 488 | | |
| 94 | |
Total: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction and land development | |
| 2,667 | | |
| 3,005 | | |
| 142 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 9,775 | | |
| 11,218 | | |
| 417 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 25,342 | | |
| 29,955 | | |
| 2,483 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 115 | | |
| 115 | | |
| 0 | |
Consumer | |
| 636 | | |
| 702 | | |
| 94 | |
| |
$ | 38,535 | | |
$ | 44,995 | | |
$ | 3,136 | |
| |
December 31, 2014 | |
| |
| | |
Unpaid | | |
Related | |
| |
Recorded | | |
Principal | | |
Valuation | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Investment | | |
Balance | | |
Allowance | |
Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction and land development | |
$ | 1,824 | | |
$ | 2,239 | | |
$ | 0 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 3,087 | | |
| 4,600 | | |
| 0 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 11,898 | | |
| 16,562 | | |
| 0 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 120 | | |
| 120 | | |
| 0 | |
Consumer | |
| 65 | | |
| 93 | | |
| 0 | |
Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction and land development | |
| 886 | | |
| 931 | | |
| 159 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 8,359 | | |
| 8,469 | | |
| 529 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 16,804 | | |
| 17,693 | | |
| 2,741 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | |
Consumer | |
| 534 | | |
| 562 | | |
| 112 | |
Total: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction and land development | |
| 2,710 | | |
| 3,170 | | |
| 159 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 11,446 | | |
| 13,069 | | |
| 529 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 28,702 | | |
| 34,255 | | |
| 2,741 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 120 | | |
| 120 | | |
| 0 | |
Consumer | |
| 599 | | |
| 655 | | |
| 112 | |
| |
$ | 43,577 | | |
$ | 51,269 | | |
$ | 3,541 | |
For the three months ended June 30, 2015
and 2014, the Company’s average recorded investments in impaired loans and related interest income were as follows:
| |
Three Months Ended | | |
Three Months Ended | |
| |
June 30, 2015 | | |
June 30, 2014 | |
| |
Average | | |
Interest | | |
Average | | |
Interest | |
| |
Recorded | | |
Income | | |
Recorded | | |
Income | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Investment | | |
Recognized | | |
Investment | | |
Recognized | |
Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Recorded: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction & land development | |
$ | 1,838 | | |
$ | 14 | | |
$ | 2,036 | | |
$ | 29 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 2,942 | | |
| 23 | | |
| 1,547 | | |
| 7 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 10,877 | | |
| 30 | | |
| 12,063 | | |
| 4 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 116 | | |
| 1 | | |
| 50 | | |
| 3 | |
Consumer | |
| 141 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 302 | | |
| 0 | |
Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction & land development | |
| 816 | | |
| 11 | | |
| 1,367 | | |
| 6 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 7,188 | | |
| 51 | | |
| 10,952 | | |
| 268 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 15,682 | | |
| 99 | | |
| 21,505 | | |
| 122 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 112 | | |
| 0 | |
Consumer | |
| 503 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 538 | | |
| 5 | |
Total: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction & land development | |
| 2,654 | | |
| 25 | | |
| 3,403 | | |
| 35 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 10,130 | | |
| 74 | | |
| 12,499 | | |
| 275 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 26,559 | | |
| 129 | | |
| 33,568 | | |
| 126 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 116 | | |
| 1 | | |
| 162 | | |
| 3 | |
Consumer | |
| 644 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 840 | | |
| 5 | |
| |
$ | 40,103 | | |
$ | 234 | | |
$ | 50,472 | | |
$ | 444 | |
For the six months ended June 30, 2015
and 2014, the Company’s average recorded investments in impaired loans and related interest income were as follows:
| |
Six Months Ended | | |
Six Months Ended | |
| |
June 30, 2015 | | |
June 30, 2014 | |
| |
Average | | |
Interest | | |
Average | | |
Interest | |
| |
Recorded | | |
Income | | |
Recorded | | |
Income | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Investment | | |
Recognized | | |
Investment | | |
Recognized | |
Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Recorded: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction & land development | |
$ | 1,839 | | |
$ | 32 | | |
$ | 2,196 | | |
$ | 51 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 2,950 | | |
| 27 | | |
| 2,394 | | |
| 7 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 11,268 | | |
| 65 | | |
| 12,333 | | |
| 7 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 118 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 76 | | |
| 5 | |
Consumer | |
| 114 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 345 | | |
| 0 | |
Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction & land development | |
| 832 | | |
| 16 | | |
| 1,311 | | |
| 12 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 7,649 | | |
| 125 | | |
| 9,853 | | |
| 361 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 16,106 | | |
| 198 | | |
| 22,215 | | |
| 251 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 88 | | |
| 0 | |
Consumer | |
| 516 | | |
| 11 | | |
| 541 | | |
| 10 | |
Total: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Construction & land development | |
| 2,671 | | |
| 48 | | |
| 3,507 | | |
| 63 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 10,599 | | |
| 152 | | |
| 12,247 | | |
| 368 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 27,374 | | |
| 263 | | |
| 34,548 | | |
| 258 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 118 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 164 | | |
| 5 | |
Consumer | |
| 630 | | |
| 11 | | |
| 886 | | |
| 10 | |
| |
$ | 41,392 | | |
$ | 477 | | |
$ | 51,352 | | |
$ | 704 | |
Impaired loans also include loans that
have been modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions to borrowers who experienced financial difficulties have been
granted. At June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, accruing TDRs totaled $23.4 million and $25.0 million, respectively.
Interest payments received on impaired
loans are recorded as interest income unless collection of the remaining recorded investment is doubtful at which time payments
received are recorded as reductions to principal. For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company recorded $477,000
and $704,000, respectively, in interest income on impaired loans.
For impaired loans whose impairment is
measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, a total of $142,000 and $141,000, respectively, was included
in interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, and represents the change in present value attributable to
the passage of time.
Activity in the allowance for loan losses
(excluding PCI loans) for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015 is summarized as follows:
| |
Allowance for Loan Losses for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 | |
| |
| | |
Provision | | |
| | |
| | |
Net | | |
| |
| |
Beginning | | |
for Loan | | |
Charge- | | |
| | |
(Charge-Offs) | | |
Ending | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance | | |
Losses | | |
Offs | | |
Recoveries | | |
Recoveries | | |
Balance | |
Construction & land development | |
$ | 842 | | |
$ | (101 | ) | |
$ | (19 | ) | |
$ | 165 | | |
$ | 146 | | |
$ | 887 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 4,827 | | |
| 535 | | |
| (146 | ) | |
| 62 | | |
| (84 | ) | |
| 5,278 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 9,666 | | |
| (182 | ) | |
| (155 | ) | |
| 358 | | |
| 203 | | |
| 9,687 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 1,374 | | |
| (411 | ) | |
| (255 | ) | |
| 237 | | |
| (18 | ) | |
| 945 | |
Consumer | |
| 919 | | |
| 895 | | |
| (60 | ) | |
| 28 | | |
| (32 | ) | |
| 1,782 | |
| |
$ | 17,628 | | |
$ | 736 | | |
$ | (635 | ) | |
$ | 850 | | |
$ | 215 | | |
$ | 18,579 | |
| |
Allowance for Loan Losses for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 | |
| |
| | |
Provision | | |
| | |
| | |
Net | | |
| |
| |
Beginning | | |
for Loan | | |
Charge- | | |
| | |
(Charge-Offs) | | |
Ending | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance | | |
Losses | | |
Offs | | |
Recoveries | | |
Recoveries | | |
Balance | |
Construction & land development | |
$ | 722 | | |
$ | 19 | | |
$ | (66 | ) | |
$ | 212 | | |
$ | 146 | | |
$ | 887 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 4,528 | | |
| 765 | | |
| (302 | ) | |
| 287 | | |
| (15 | ) | |
| 5,278 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 9,784 | | |
| (549 | ) | |
| (322 | ) | |
| 773 | | |
| 451 | | |
| 9,686 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 1,179 | | |
| (288 | ) | |
| (274 | ) | |
| 328 | | |
| 54 | | |
| 945 | |
Consumer | |
| 794 | | |
| 1,193 | | |
| (254 | ) | |
| 50 | | |
| (204 | ) | |
| 1,783 | |
| |
$ | 17,007 | | |
$ | 1,140 | | |
$ | (1,218 | ) | |
$ | 1,650 | | |
$ | 432 | | |
$ | 18,579 | |
Activity in the allowance for loan losses
for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 is summarized as follows:
| |
Allowance for Loan Losses for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 | |
| |
| | |
Provision | | |
| | |
| | |
Net | | |
| |
| |
Beginning | | |
for Loan | | |
Charge- | | |
| | |
(Charge-Offs) | | |
Ending | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance | | |
Losses | | |
Offs | | |
Recoveries | | |
Recoveries | | |
Balance | |
Construction & land development | |
$ | 796 | | |
$ | 240 | | |
$ | (196 | ) | |
$ | 27 | | |
$ | (169 | ) | |
$ | 867 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 6,753 | | |
| (1,528 | ) | |
| (50 | ) | |
| 18 | | |
| (32 | ) | |
| 5,193 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 10,358 | | |
| (32 | ) | |
| (95 | ) | |
| 400 | | |
| 305 | | |
| 10,631 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 853 | | |
| (167 | ) | |
| 0 | | |
| 23 | | |
| 23 | | |
| 709 | |
Consumer | |
| 712 | | |
| 43 | | |
| (40 | ) | |
| 25 | | |
| (15 | ) | |
| 740 | |
| |
$ | 19,472 | | |
$ | (1,444 | ) | |
$ | (381 | ) | |
$ | 493 | | |
$ | 112 | | |
$ | 18,140 | |
| |
Allowance for Loan Losses for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 | |
| |
| | |
Provision | | |
| | |
| | |
Net | | |
| |
| |
Beginning | | |
for Loan | | |
Charge- | | |
| | |
(Charge-Offs) | | |
Ending | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance | | |
Losses | | |
Offs | | |
Recoveries | | |
Recoveries | | |
Balance | |
Construction & land development | |
$ | 808 | | |
$ | 204 | | |
$ | (199 | ) | |
$ | 54 | | |
$ | (145 | ) | |
$ | 867 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 6,160 | | |
| (1,087 | ) | |
| (134 | ) | |
| 254 | | |
| 120 | | |
| 5,193 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 11,659 | | |
| (1,410 | ) | |
| (207 | ) | |
| 589 | | |
| 382 | | |
| 10,631 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 710 | | |
| 53 | | |
| (108 | ) | |
| 54 | | |
| (54 | ) | |
| 709 | |
Consumer | |
| 731 | | |
| 61 | | |
| (97 | ) | |
| 45 | | |
| (52 | ) | |
| 740 | |
| |
$ | 20,068 | | |
$ | (2,179 | ) | |
$ | (745 | ) | |
$ | 996 | | |
$ | 251 | | |
$ | 18,140 | |
The allowance for loan losses is composed
of specific allowances for certain impaired loans and general allowances grouped into loan pools based on similar characteristics.
The Company’s loan portfolio (excluding PCI loans) and related allowance at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is shown
in the following tables:
| |
At June 30, 2015 | |
| |
Individually Evaluated for | | |
Collectively Evaluated for | | |
| | |
| |
| |
Impairment | | |
Impairment | | |
Total | |
| |
Carrying | | |
Associated | | |
Carrying | | |
Associated | | |
Carrying | | |
Associated | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Value | | |
Allowance | | |
Value | | |
Allowance | | |
Value | | |
Allowance | |
Construction & land development | |
$ | 2,667 | | |
$ | 142 | | |
$ | 91,022 | | |
$ | 745 | | |
$ | 93,689 | | |
$ | 887 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 9,775 | | |
| 417 | | |
| 879,203 | | |
| 4,861 | | |
| 888,978 | | |
| 5,278 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 25,342 | | |
| 2,483 | | |
| 669,929 | | |
| 7,203 | | |
| 695,271 | | |
| 9,686 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 115 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 188,993 | | |
| 945 | | |
| 189,108 | | |
| 945 | |
Consumer | |
| 636 | | |
| 94 | | |
| 63,155 | | |
| 1,689 | | |
| 63,791 | | |
| 1,783 | |
| |
$ | 38,535 | | |
$ | 3,136 | | |
$ | 1,892,302 | | |
$ | 15,443 | | |
$ | 1,930,837 | | |
$ | 18,579 | |
| |
At December 31, 2014 | |
| |
Individually Evaluated for | | |
Collectively Evaluated for | | |
| | |
| |
| |
Impairment | | |
Impairment | | |
Total | |
| |
Carrying | | |
Associated | | |
Carrying | | |
Associated | | |
Carrying | | |
Associated | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Value | | |
Allowance | | |
Value | | |
Allowance | | |
Value | | |
Allowance | |
Construction & land development | |
$ | 2,710 | | |
$ | 159 | | |
$ | 82,769 | | |
$ | 563 | | |
$ | 85,479 | | |
$ | 722 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 11,446 | | |
| 529 | | |
| 821,609 | | |
| 3,999 | | |
| 833,055 | | |
| 4,528 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 28,702 | | |
| 2,741 | | |
| 657,344 | | |
| 7,043 | | |
| 686,046 | | |
| 9,784 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 120 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 155,964 | | |
| 1,179 | | |
| 156,084 | | |
| 1,179 | |
Consumer | |
| 599 | | |
| 112 | | |
| 52,808 | | |
| 682 | | |
| 53,407 | | |
| 794 | |
| |
$ | 43,577 | | |
$ | 3,541 | | |
$ | 1,770,494 | | |
$ | 13,466 | | |
$ | 1,814,071 | | |
$ | 17,007 | |
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 included loans acquired from BANKshares on October 1, 2014 that are not PCI loans. These
loans are performing loans recorded at estimated fair value at the acquisition date. The fair value adjustment represents the total
fair value discount of each PUL, is accreted into interest income over the remaining lives of the related loans on a level yield
basis, and remained adequate at June 30, 2015.
The table below summarizes PCI loans that
were individually evaluated for impairment based on expected cash flows at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
| |
PCI Loans Individually Evaluated for Impairment | |
| |
June 30, 2015 | | |
December 31, 2014 | |
| |
Carrying | | |
Associated | | |
Carrying | | |
Associated | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Value | | |
Allowance | | |
Value | | |
Allowance | |
Construction & land development | |
$ | 1,489 | | |
$ | 212 | | |
$ | 1,557 | | |
$ | 43 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 3,350 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 4,092 | | |
| 3 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 506 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 851 | | |
| 18 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 1,217 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 1,312 | | |
| 0 | |
Consumer | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 0 | |
| |
$ | 6,562 | | |
$ | 212 | | |
$ | 7,814 | | |
$ | 64 | |
NOTE G – SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
are accounted for as secured borrowings. For securities sold under agreements to repurchase, the Company would be obligated to
provide additional collateral in the event of a significant decline in fair value of collateral pledged. At June 30, 2015 and December
31, 2014, Company securities pledged were as follows by collateral type and maturity:
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Overnight and Continuous Maturity | |
| |
| | |
| |
Fair Value | |
June 30, 2015 | | |
December
31, 2014 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage | |
| | |
| |
obligations of U.S. Government Sponsored Entities | |
$ | 157,676 | | |
$ | 153,640 | |
NOTE H — EQUITY CAPITAL
The Company is well capitalized and at
June 30, 2015, the Company and the Company’s principal banking subsidiary, Seacoast National Bank, or “Seacoast National”,
met the new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio (CET1) regulatory threshold of 6.5% for well-capitalized institutions under the
new Basel III standardized transition approach, as well as risk-based and leverage ratio requirements for well capitalized banks
under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
NOTE I — CONTINGENCIES
The Company and its subsidiaries, because
of the nature of their businesses, are at all times subject to numerous legal actions, threatened or filed. Management presently
believes that none of the legal proceedings to which it is a party are likely to have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial condition, operating results or cash flows, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate
outcome of any such claim or litigation.
NOTE J — FAIR VALUE
Under ASC 820, fair value measurements
for items measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 included:
| |
| | |
Quoted Prices | | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
in Active | | |
Significant | | |
| |
| |
| | |
Markets for | | |
Other | | |
Significant | |
| |
| | |
Identical | | |
Observable | | |
Unobservable | |
| |
Fair Value | | |
Assets | | |
Inputs | | |
Inputs | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Measurements | | |
(Level 1) | | |
(Level 2) | | |
(Level 3) | |
At June 30, 2015: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Available for sale securities (3) | |
$ | 762,086 | | |
$ | 3,843 | | |
$ | 758,243 | | |
$ | 0 | |
Loans held for sale (4) | |
| 19,656 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 19,656 | | |
| 0 | |
Loans (1) | |
| 7,913 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 6,420 | | |
| 1,493 | |
Other real estate owned (2) | |
| 5,908 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 2,055 | | |
| 3,853 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
At December 31, 2014: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Available for sale securities (3) | |
$ | 741,375 | | |
$ | 3,899 | | |
$ | 737,476 | | |
$ | 0 | |
Loans held for sale (4) | |
| 12,078 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 12,078 | | |
| 0 | |
Loans (1) | |
| 10,409 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 8,324 | | |
| 2,085 | |
Other real estate owned (2) | |
| 7,462 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 1,468 | | |
| 5,994 | |
| (1) | See Note F. Nonrecurring fair value adjustments to loans identified as impaired reflect full
or partial write-downs that are based on the loan’s observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral
in accordance with ASC 310. |
| (2) | Fair value is measured on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with ASC 360. |
| (3) | See Note D for further detail of fair value of individual
investment categories. |
| (4) | Recurring fair value basis determined using observable
market data. |
The fair value of impaired real estate
loans which are collateral dependent is based on recent real estate appraisals less estimated costs of sale. For residential real
estate impaired loans, appraised values or internal evaluation are based on the comparative sales approach. These impaired loans
are considered level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. For commercial and commercial real estate impaired loans, evaluations may use
either a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches, such as comparative sales, cost and/or income approach. A significant
unobservable input in the income approach is the estimated capitalization rate for a given piece of collateral. At June 30,
2015 the range of capitalization rates utilized to determine fair value of the underlying collateral averaged approximately 8.1%.
Adjustments to comparable sales may be made by an appraiser to reflect local market conditions or other economic factors and may
result in changes in the fair value of an asset over time. As such, the fair value of these impaired loans is considered level
3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Fair value of available for sale securities
are determined using valuation techniques for individual investments as described in Note D.
When appraisals are used to determine fair
value and the appraisals are based on a market approach, the fair value of other real estate owned (“OREO”) is classified
as a level 2 input. When the fair value of OREO is based on appraisals which require significant adjustments to market-based valuation
inputs or apply an income approach based on unobservable cash flows, the fair value of OREO is classified as Level 3 inputs.
Transfers between levels of the fair value
hierarchy are recognized on the actual date of the event or circumstances that caused the transfer, which generally coincides with
the Company’s monthly and/or quarterly valuation process.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015,
there were no transfers between level 1 and level 2 assets carried at fair value.
For loans classified as level 3, transfers
in totaled $0.4 million for the first six months of 2015. Transfers out consisted of charge-offs of $0.2 million, and principal
payments and other reductions totaling $0.8 million for loans classified as level 3.
Charge-offs recognized upon loan foreclosures
are generally offset by general or specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses and generally do not, and did not during
the reported periods, significantly impact the Company’s provision for loan losses.
For OREO classified as level 3 during the
first six months of 2015, foreclosed loans transferred in were nominal. Transfers out totaled $2.1 million and consisted entirely
of sales.
The carrying amount and fair value of the
Company’s other significant financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the balance
sheet as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is as follows:
| |
| | |
Quoted Prices | | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
in Active | | |
Significant | | |
| |
| |
| | |
Markets for | | |
Other | | |
Significant | |
| |
| | |
Identical | | |
Observable | | |
Unobservable | |
| |
Carrying | | |
Assets | | |
Inputs | | |
Inputs | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Amount | | |
(Level 1) | | |
(Level 2) | | |
(Level 3) | |
At June 30, 2015: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Financial Assets | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Securities held to maturity (1) | |
$ | 214,777 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 216,176 | | |
$ | 0 | |
Loans, net | |
| 1,910,695 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 1,926,219 | |
Financial Liabilities | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Deposit liabilities | |
| 2,605,177 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 2,605,883 | |
Borrowings | |
| 50,000 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 52,424 | | |
| 0 | |
Subordinated debt | |
| 64,670 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 53,948 | | |
| 0 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
At December 31, 2014: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Financial Assets | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Securities held to maturity (1) | |
$ | 207,904 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 208,788 | | |
$ | 0 | |
Loans, net | |
| 1,794,405 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 1,814,746 | |
Financial Liabilities | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Deposit liabilities | |
| 2,416,534 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 2,417,355 | |
Borrowings | |
| 50,000 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 53,584 | | |
| 0 | |
Subordinated debt | |
| 64,583 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 53,861 | | |
| 0 | |
| (1) | See Note D for further detail of fair value of individual
investment categories. |
The short maturity of Seacoast’s
assets and liabilities results in having a significant number of financial instruments whose fair value equals or closely approximates
carrying value. Such financial instruments are reported in the following balance sheet captions: cash and cash equivalents, interest
bearing deposits with other banks, federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase, maturing within 30
days.
The following methods and assumptions were
used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate that value at June 30,
2015 and December 31, 2014:
Securities: U.S. Treasury securities
are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 inputs. Other securities are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs.
The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury
yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s
terms and conditions, among other things.
The Company reviews the prices supplied
by the independent pricing service, as well as their underlying pricing methodologies, for reasonableness and to ensure such prices
are aligned with traditional pricing matrices. In general, the Company does not purchase investment portfolio securities that are
esoteric or that have a complicated structure. The Company’s portfolio consists of traditional investments, nearly all of
which are U.S. Treasury obligations, federal agency bullet or mortgage pass-through securities, or general obligation or revenue
based municipal bonds. Pricing for such instruments is fairly generic and is easily obtained. The fair value of the collateralized
loan obligations are determined from broker quotes. From time to time, the Company will validate, on a sample basis, prices supplied
by the independent pricing service by comparison to prices obtained from other brokers and third-party sources or derived using
internal models.
Loans: Fair
values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial,
mortgage, etc. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and nonperforming
categories. The fair value of loans, except residential mortgages, is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the
estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risks inherent in the loan.
For residential mortgage loans, fair value is estimated by discounting contractual cash flows adjusting for prepayment assumptions
using discount rates based on secondary market sources. The estimated fair value is not an exit price fair value under ASC 820
when this valuation technique is used.
Loans held for
sale: Fair values are based upon estimated values to be received from independent third party purchasers.
Deposit Liabilities:
The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and money market deposits is the amount payable at the reporting date. The
fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for funding of similar remaining
maturities.
Borrowings:
The fair value of floating rate borrowings is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed rate
borrowings is estimated using the rates currently offered for borrowings of similar remaining maturities.
Subordinated debt:
The fair value of the floating rate subordinated debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, estimates of the Company’s
current incremental borrowing rate for similar instruments and dealer quotes for similar debt.
NOTE K — ACQUISITION
Acquisition of Grand Bank & Trust of Florida
On July 17, 2015, the
Company completed its previously announced acquisition of Grand Bancshares, Inc. (“Grand”) as set forth in the
Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Agreement”) whereby Grand merged with and into the Company. Pursuant to and
simultaneously with the merger of Grand with and into the Company, Grand’s wholly owned subsidiary bank, Grand Bank
& Trust of Florida (“GB”), merged with and into the Company’s subsidiary bank, Seacoast National
Bank.
The Company’s primary reasons for
the transaction were to further solidify its market share in the attractive Palm Beach market and expand its customer base and
leverage operating cost through economies of scale. The acquisition increased the Company’s total assets and total deposits
by approximately 6.5% and 7.3%, respectively, as compared with the balances at June 30, 2015, and is expected to positively affect
the Company’s operating results to the extent the Company earns more from interest earning assets than it pays in interest
on its interest bearing liabilities.
The acquisition will be accounted for under
the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. The Company will recognize
goodwill on this acquisition which is nondeductible for tax purposes as this acquisition is a nontaxable transaction. The goodwill
will be calculated based on the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date, which at
the date of this filing were incomplete due to the timing of the transaction closing and, in some instances, on use of third party
experts for valuations.
Fair value estimates are subject to change
for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information relative to closing date fair values becomes
available. Fair values at the date of this filing are pending valuations for the core deposit intangible and pending appraisals on purchased unimpaired loans and purchased credit impaired loans, bank premises and other fixed assets,
other real estate owned, subordinated debt, and remaining assets and other liabilities. Loans that are nonaccrual and all loan
relationships identified as impaired as of the acquisition date will be considered by management to be credit impaired and will
be accounted for pursuant to ASC Topic 310-30.
The Company acquired 100% of
the outstanding common stock of Grand. The purchase price consisted of stock and approximately $1.48 million in cash for all
of Grand’s outstanding shares of preferred B stock, representing the par value of $1,000 per share of preferred
B stock. Each share of Grand common stock and preferred A stock was exchanged for 0.3114 shares of the Company’s
common stock, or approximately 1.09 million shares of Company stock. Based on the price of the Company’s common stock
of $15.75 per share on July 17, 2015, plus cash paid for Grand’s outstanding shares of preferred B stock, the
total purchase price was $18.7 million.
The Company believes the deposits assumed
from the acquisition will have an intangible value. The Company will be applying ASC Topic 805, which prescribes the accounting
for goodwill and other intangible assets such as core deposit intangibles, in a business combination. In determining the valuation
amount, deposits will be analyzed based on factors such as type of deposit, deposit retention, interest rates and age of deposit
relationships.
Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SECOND QUARTER 2015
The following discussion and analysis is
designed to provide a better understanding of the significant factors related to the Company’s results of operations and
financial condition. Such discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements and the related notes included in this report. For purposes of the following discussion, the words the “Company,”
“we,” “us,” and “our” refer to the combined entities of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida
and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries.
STRATEGIC OVERVIEW
Seacoast continues to execute on its
plan to grow our core business organically, innovate to build franchise and increase efficiency, and grow through
mergers & acquisitions. We believe that these investments are better positioning us to increase net income to common
shareholders in 2015, and prospectively. These included:
| • | Investment in the Accelerate lending model, expanding geographically
with low cost, high service community banking offices; |
| • | continued investments in digital technology and improved
processes providing significant cross sell to legacy customers and reducing overhead; |
| • | completion of our acquisitions of The BANKshares, Inc.
(“BANKshares”) on October 1, 2014, and Grand Bankshares, Inc. (“Grand”) on July 17, 2015, and; |
| • | consolidation of branch locations, totaling more than 25%
of total branch locations over the past five years. |
Through ongoing investments in loan production
personnel, digital technology and the effects of asset quality improvements and expense management, we have proactively positioned
our business for growth. We believe our targeted plan to grow our customer and commercial franchise is the best way to build shareholder
value.
While our focus is organic growth, we expect
to supplement this growth through strategic acquisition opportunities. Recently, we completed an enhancement to our footprint in
the Palm Beach County, Florida market. On July 17, 2015, the acquisition of Grand, and its subsidiary, Grand Bank & Trust of
Florida, was completed and merged into Seacoast. Seacoast’s primary reason for the transaction is to further solidify its
market share in the Palm Beach county market, expanding our customer base further to enhance deposit fee income, and to leverage
operating costs through economies of scale. The acquisition contributed about $212 million in assets, $121 million in loans and
$190 million in deposits that include transaction accounts totaling around 47% of total deposits at a rate of 8 basis points complementing
our overall funding. The acquisition also provides excellent opportunities for growth in one of Florida’s most vibrant markets
and was completed with no tangible book value dilution and is immediately accretive to our earnings per share.
The Company continues to focus on reaching
customers in unique ways, creating a path to achieve higher customer satisfaction. Our newest commercial lending offices provide
our customers with talented, results-oriented staff, specializing in loans to the smaller business market segment. From their tenure
and market experience, our bankers are familiar with the multitude of challenges the small business customer faces. In addition,
the acquisition of a receivables factoring subsidiary in the BANKshares merger was further enhanced by the addition of a receivables
funding team from First Capital Growth (FGC) in the Palm Beach County market in the second quarter of 2015, providing an additional
outlet for another product vehicle to better serve customers. Seacoast intends to build customer relationships with depth that
surpass traditional commercial lending, and open opportunities into other areas in which we provide services.
We refreshed and reintroduced our brand
in 2014, retooling our logo and associated signage throughout our branch network and digital platforms in the fourth quarter. Our
new brand reflects our forward-looking strategy. Our customer growth strategy has included investments in digital delivery and
products that we believe have contributed to increasing core customer funding. As of June 30, 2015, almost 61% of our online
customers have adopted our mobile product offerings, and the total number of services utilized by our retail customers increased
to an average of 4.3 per household, primarily due to an increase in debit card activation, direct deposit and mobile banking users.
Personal and business mobile banking has grown from 13,659 users at December 31, 2013 to 21,587 users at December 31, 2014 to 26,603
users at June 30, 2015. We are concentrating on building a more integrated distribution system which will allow us to reduce
our fixed costs as we further invest in technology designed to better serve our customers. The growth in new households, a deepening
of relationships with current households, and better retention overall is creating stronger value in our core customer franchise.
Embracing technology, especially electronic
delivery channels, has helped us improve efficiency. As an example, over the past five years we have been successful in closing
more than 25% of our branches. This has allowed us to improve our deposit to facilities square footage from between $9,000 and
$10,000 of deposits per square foot to approximately $12,500 deposits per square foot, a 30% improvement.
EARNINGS OVERVIEW
The Company has built steadily
improved results over the past several quarters and particularly into 2015. Net income for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2015 of $5.8 million or $0.18 per average common diluted share and $11.7 million or $0.35 per average common
diluted share, respectively, compared to $1.9 million or $0.07 per average common diluted share and $4.2 million or $0.16 per
average common diluted share, respectively, for the same period a year ago. This reflects a strong 203% growth rate in net
income compared to the second quarter 2014. Net income of $5.9 million or $0.18 per average common diluted share was recorded
for the first quarter of 2015. We believe that our success in increasing net income is the result of our success in
significantly growing our businesses and balance sheet, while attaining operating efficiency. This success also reflects the
success we have had in identifying and incorporating acquisitions.
We expect that the Company’s
capital will continue to increase with positive earnings. The board and management currently believe that
the Company’s overall level of capital is more than sufficient to support growth, given the current
economic environment.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of consolidated financial
statements requires management to make judgments in the application of certain of its accounting policies that involve significant
estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions, which may materially affect the reported amounts of certain assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements, and changes
in this information over time and the use of revised estimates and assumptions could materially affect amounts reported in subsequent
financial statements. Management, after consultation with the Company’s Audit Committee, believes the most critical accounting
estimates and assumptions that involve the most difficult, subjective and complex assessments are:
| • | the
allowance and the provision for loan losses; |
| • | fair
value measurements; |
| • | acquisition
accounting and purchased loans |
| • | other
than temporary impairment of securities; |
| • | realization
of deferred tax assets; and |
The following is a discussion of the critical
accounting policies intended to facilitate a reader’s understanding of the judgments, estimates and assumptions underlying
these accounting policies and the possible or likely events or uncertainties known to us that could have a material effect on our
reported financial information.
Allowance and Provision for Loan Losses
The information contained on pages 44-45
and 50-59 related to the “Provision for Loan Losses”, “Loan Portfolio”, “Allowance for Loan Losses”
and “Nonperforming Assets” is intended to describe the known trends, events and uncertainties which could materially
affect the Company’s accounting estimates related to our allowance for loan losses.
Acquisition Accounting and Purchased
Loans
The Company accounts for its acquisitions
under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use of the acquisition method of accounting. All identifiable
assets acquired, including loans, are recorded at fair value. No allowance for loan losses related to the acquired loans is recorded
on the acquisition date as the fair value of the loans acquired incorporates assumptions regarding credit risk. All loans acquired
are recorded at fair value in accordance with the fair value methodology prescribed in ASC Topic 820. The fair value estimates
associated with the loans include estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of expected principal, interest
and other cash flows.
Over the life of the purchased credit impaired
loans acquired, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected. The Company evaluates at each balance sheet
date whether the present value of the acquired loans using the effective interest rates has decreased and if so, recognizes a provision
for loan loss in its consolidated statement of income. For any increases in cash flows expected to be collected, the Company adjusts
the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loan’s remaining life.
All impaired loans are reviewed quarterly
to determine if fair value adjustments are necessary based on known changes in the market and/or the project assumptions. When
necessary, the “As Is” appraised value may be adjusted based on more recent appraisal assumptions received by the Company
on other similar properties, the tax assessed market value, comparative sales and/or an internal valuation. If an updated assessment
is deemed necessary and an internal valuation cannot be made, an external “As Is” appraisal will be obtained. If the
“As Is” appraisal does not appropriately reflect the current fair market value, in the Company’s opinion, a specific
reserve is established and/or the loan is written down to the current fair market value.
Collateral dependent impaired loans are
loans that are solely dependent on the liquidation of the collateral for repayment. All OREO and repossessed assets
(“REPO”) are reviewed quarterly to determine if fair value adjustments are necessary based on known changes in the
market and/or project assumptions. When necessary, the “As Is” appraisal is adjusted based on more recent appraisal
assumptions received by the Company on other similar properties, the tax assessment market value, comparative sales and/or an internal
valuation is performed. If an updated assessment is deemed necessary, and an internal valuation cannot be made, an external appraisal
will be requested. Upon receipt of the “As Is” appraisal a charge-off is recognized for the difference between the
loan amount and its current fair market value.
“As Is” values are used to
measure fair market value on impaired loans, OREO and REPOs.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of goodwill and
core deposit intangibles. Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in business
acquisitions. The core deposit intangible represents the excess intangible value of acquired deposit customer relationships as
determined by valuation specialists. The core deposit intangible from the BANKshares acquisition is being amortized over 74 months
on a straight-line basis. Goodwill is not amortized but rather is evaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis. We will
perform an annual impairment test of goodwill and the core deposit intangible as required by FASB ASC 350, Intangibles—Goodwill
and Other, in the fourth quarter for the BANKshares acquisition (on October 1, 2014).
Fair value estimates are based on the information available, and are subject to change for up to one year after the closing date
of the acquisition as additional information relative to closing date fair values becomes available.
Other Than Temporary Impairment of Securities
Our investments are reviewed quarterly
for other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”). The following primary factors are considered for securities identified
for OTTI testing: percent decline in fair value, rating downgrades, subordination, duration, amortized loan-to-value, and the ability
of the issuers to pay all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms. Prices obtained from pricing services are usually
not adjusted. Based on our internal review procedures and the fair values provided by the pricing services, we believe that the
fair values provided by the pricing services are consistent with the principles of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. However, on
occasion pricing provided by the pricing services may not be consistent with other observed prices in the market for similar securities.
Using observable market factors, including interest rate and yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities and
default rates, the Company may at times validate the observed prices using a discounted cash flow model and using the observed
prices for similar securities to determine the fair value of its securities.
Changes in the fair values, as a result
of deteriorating economic conditions and credit spread changes, should only be temporary. Further, management believes that the
Company’s other sources of liquidity, as well as the cash flow from principal and interest payments from its securities portfolio,
reduces the risk that losses would be realized as a result of a need to sell securities to obtain liquidity.
Realization of Deferred Tax Assets
At June 30, 2015, the Company had
net deferred tax assets (“DTA”) of $58.6 million. In comparison, at June 30, 2014 the Company had a net DTA of
$59.8 million. Although realization is not assured, management believes that realization of the carrying value of the DTA is more
likely than not, based upon expectations as to future taxable income and tax planning strategies, as defined by ASC 740 Income
Taxes.
The most important factors that supported
this conclusion were:
|
• |
|
Income before tax (“IBT”) has steadily increased as a result
of organic growth and the 2014 acquisition, and the acquisition of Grand should further assist in achieving
management’s forecast of future earnings which recovers the net operating loss carry-forwards before expiration; |
|
• |
|
Credit costs improved and overall credit risk has declined which decreases the impact on future taxable earnings; |
|
• |
|
Forecasted growth rates for loans are at levels considered reasonable and supported by the acquisition, increased loan officers and support staff; |
|
• |
|
New loan production credit quality and concentrations are being well managed through improved and enhanced credit functions and therefore will not cause increased credit costs; and |
|
• |
|
Current economic growth forecasts for Florida and the Company’s markets in particular are robustly supported by population increases. |
Contingent Liabilities
The Company is subject to contingent liabilities,
including judicial, regulatory and arbitration proceedings, and tax and other claims arising from the conduct of our business activities.
These proceedings include actions brought against the Company and/or our subsidiaries with respect to transactions in which the
Company and/or our subsidiaries acted as a lender, a financial advisor, a broker or acted in a related activity. Accruals are established
for legal and other claims when it becomes probable that the Company will incur an expense and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
Company management, together with attorneys, consultants and other professionals, assesses the probability and estimated amounts
involved in a contingency. Throughout the life of a contingency, the Company or our advisors may learn of additional information
that can affect our assessments about probability or about the estimates of amounts involved. Changes in these assessments can
lead to changes in recorded reserves. In addition, the actual costs of resolving these claims may be substantially higher or lower
than the amounts reserved for the claims. At June 30, 2015 the Company had no significant accruals for contingent liabilities
and had no known pending matters that could potentially be significant.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income increased $9.0 million
during the second quarter of 2015 compared to the same period in 2014, and was nominally lower (by $46,000) than first quarter
2015’s result. Our net interest margin was 40 basis points higher compared to second quarter 2014’s margin and 12 basis
points lower than for first quarter 2015. Net interest income for the second quarter of 2015 was near the level earned in first
quarter 2015, despite a significant amount of excess purchase loan accretion recognized in the first quarter of 2015. Strong loan
growth (a $55.0 million average balance increase) helped to offset the impact of reduced purchased loan accretion. Year over year,
2015’s second quarter net interest income and margin reflects completion of the BANKshares merger, higher spreads earned
from an improving loan mix, loan portfolio growth, and funding costs that have remained stable. The Company expects loan growth
opportunities for all types of lending to continue in 2015, including commercial lending to targeted customer segments and 1-4
family agency conforming residential mortgages, and will continue its focus to improve deposit mix by increasing low cost deposits.
We anticipate 2015’s net interest income will continue to benefit from the full year impact of the BANKshares acquisition
as well as the Grand acquisition, completed in the third quarter of 2015.
The following table details average balances,
net interest income and margin results (on a tax equivalent basis) for the second and first quarter of 2015, and the second quarter
of 2014.
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
| |
Second
Quarter | | |
First
Quarter | | |
Second
Quarter | |
| |
Average | | |
| | |
Yield/ | | |
Average | | |
| | |
Yield/ | | |
Average | | |
| | |
Yield/ | |
(Dollars
in thousands) | |
Balance | | |
Interest | | |
Rate | | |
Balance | | |
Interest | | |
Rate | | |
Balance | | |
Interest | | |
Rate | |
Assets | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Earning assets: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Securities: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Taxable | |
$ | 957,374 | | |
$ | 4,977 | | |
| 2.08 | % | |
$ | 939,015 | | |
$ | 4,898 | | |
| 2.09 | % | |
$ | 677,600 | | |
$ | 3,630 | | |
| 2.14 | % |
Nontaxable | |
| 15,311 | | |
| 225 | | |
| 5.87 | | |
| 15,617 | | |
| 230 | | |
| 5.89 | | |
| 827 | | |
| 14 | | |
| 6.77 | |
Total Securities | |
| 972,685 | | |
| 5,202 | | |
| 2.14 | | |
| 954,632 | | |
| 5,128 | | |
| 2.15 | | |
| 678,427 | | |
| 3,644 | | |
| 2.15 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Federal
funds sold and other investments | |
| 79,031 | | |
| 249 | | |
| 1.26 | | |
| 92,934 | | |
| 249 | | |
| 1.09 | | |
| 153,410 | | |
| 246 | | |
| 0.64 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Loans, net | |
| 1,904,011 | | |
| 22,032 | | |
| 4.64 | | |
| 1,848,965 | | |
| 22,065 | | |
| 4.84 | | |
| 1,338,415 | | |
| 14,151 | | |
| 4.24 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total Earning
Assets | |
| 2,955,727 | | |
| 27,483 | | |
| 3.73 | | |
| 2,896,531 | | |
| 27,442 | | |
| 3.84 | | |
| 2,170,252 | | |
| 18,041 | | |
| 3.33 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Allowance
for loan losses | |
| (18,247 | ) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| (17,385 | ) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| (19,784 | ) | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash
and due from banks | |
| 71,858 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 63,689 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 35,735 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Premises
and equipment | |
| 49,275 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 46,605 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 34,948 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Intangible
assets | |
| 32,188 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 31,221 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 422 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Bank
owned life insurance | |
| 36,111 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 35,793 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 0 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Other assets | |
| 98,215 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 94,678 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 83,297 | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
$ | 3,225,127 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
$ | 3,151,132 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
$ | 2,304,870 | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Liabilities
& Shareholders' Equity | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest-bearing liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest-bearing demand | |
$ | 612,433 | | |
$ | 110 | | |
| 0.07 | % | |
$ | 628,480 | | |
$ | 117 | | |
| 0.08 | % | |
$ | 498,285 | | |
$ | 94 | | |
| 0.08 | % |
Savings | |
| 279,354 | | |
| 41 | | |
| 0.06 | | |
| 268,041 | | |
| 39 | | |
| 0.06 | | |
| 205,686 | | |
| 23 | | |
| 0.04 | |
Money market | |
| 607,271 | | |
| 373 | | |
| 0.25 | | |
| 519,526 | | |
| 245 | | |
| 0.19 | | |
| 336,772 | | |
| 67 | | |
| 0.08 | |
Time deposits | |
| 303,802 | | |
| 321 | | |
| 0.42 | | |
| 318,343 | | |
| 347 | | |
| 0.44 | | |
| 259,325 | | |
| 386 | | |
| 0.60 | |
Federal funds purchased and
other short term borrowings | |
| 168,068 | | |
| 77 | | |
| 0.18 | | |
| 212,123 | | |
| 98 | | |
| 0.19 | | |
| 150,108 | | |
| 65 | | |
| 0.17 | |
Other borrowings | |
| 114,649 | | |
| 773 | | |
| 2.70 | | |
| 114,606 | | |
| 762 | | |
| 2.70 | | |
| 103,610 | | |
| 627 | | |
| 2.43 | |
Total
Interest-Bearing Liabilities | |
| 2,085,577 | | |
| 1,695 | | |
| 0.33 | | |
| 2,061,119 | | |
| 1,608 | | |
| 0.32 | | |
| 1,553,786 | | |
| 1,262 | | |
| 0.33 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Noninterest demand | |
| 795,707 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 753,620 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 505,892 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Other liabilities | |
| 17,505 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 16,047 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 8,560 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total Liabilities | |
| 2,898,789 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 2,830,786 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 2,068,238 | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Shareholders' equity | |
| 326,338 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 320,346 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 236,632 | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
$ | 3,225,127 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
$ | 3,151,132 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
$ | 2,304,870 | | |
| | | |
| | |
As a % of earning assets: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest expense | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 0.23 | % | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 0.23 | % | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 0.23 | % |
Net interest
income (1) | |
| | | |
$ | 25,788 | | |
| 3.50 | % | |
| | | |
$ | 25,834 | | |
| 3.62 | % | |
| | | |
$ | 16,779 | | |
| 3.10 | % |
| (1) | On a fully taxable equivalent basis, a non-GAAP measure, as defined (see Non-GAAP Measure on page 41). All yields and
rates have
been computed on an annual basis using amortized cost.
Fees on loans have been included in interest on loans. Nonaccrual
loans are included in loan balances. |
The earning asset mix changed year over
year impacting net interest income. For the second quarter of 2015, average loans (the highest yielding component of earning assets)
as a percentage of average earning assets totaled 64.4%, compared to 61.7% a year ago. Average securities as a percentage of average
earning assets increased from 31.3% a year ago to 32.9% for the second quarter of 2015 and interest bearing deposits and other
investments declined to 2.7% in 2015 from 7.0% in 2014. Average total loans as a percentage of earning assets increased, and the
mix of loans was improved, with volumes related to commercial and commercial real estate loans representing 58.7% of total loans
at June 30, 2015 (compared to 48.9% at June 30, 2014), and lower yielding residential loan balances with individuals (including
home equity loans and lines, and personal construction loans) representing 38.0% of total loans at June 30, 2015 (versus 47.7%
at June 30, 2014) (see “Loan Portfolio”).
The yield on earning assets for the second
quarter of 2015 was 3.73%, 40 basis points higher than 2014’s second quarter. The acquisition of BANKshares improved the
loan mix, and together with organic loan growth during the first and second quarters of 2015 contributed to the increase. The deployment
of liquidity contributed to yield improvement as well from 2014. The following table details the yield on earning assets (on a
tax equivalent basis) which has improved significantly over the past five quarters:
| |
Second | | |
First | | |
Fourth | | |
Third | | |
Second | |
| |
Quarter | | |
Quarter | | |
Quarter | | |
Quarter | | |
Quarter | |
| |
2015 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2014 | | |
2014 | |
Yield | |
| 3.73 | % | |
| 3.84 | % | |
| 3.78 | % | |
| 3.40 | % | |
| 3.33 | % |
Our yield on loans increased quite dramatically
over the first and fourth quarters of 2015 and 2014, respectively, up 17 basis points to 4.84% for the first quarter of 2015 from
fourth quarter 2014, and improving by 41 basis points during the fourth quarter 2014 compared to third quarter 2014’s yield,
for all the reasons previously detailed, but primarily an improved loan mix and purchased loan accretion. The yield on loans for
the second quarter of 2015 was lower by 20 basis linked quarter, entirely due to lower purchased loan accretion. The yield on investment
securities remained steady, decreasing only 1 basis point year over year to 2.14% for the second quarter 2015. Average total investment
securities increased 43.4% compared to a year ago, while prepayments of principal from refinancing activities on mortgage backed
securities held in the portfolio slowed and comparable add-on rates for recent purchases was obtained. The yield on interest bearing
deposits and other investments was higher at 1.26% for the second quarter of 2015, up 62 basis points compared to a year ago and
reflecting lower balances for interest bearing deposits at the Federal Reserve earning only 25 basis points.
Average earning assets for the second quarter
of 2015 increased $785.5 million or 36.2% compared to 2014’s second quarter average balance. Average loan balances for 2015
increased $565.6 million or 42.3% to $1,904.0 million, average investment securities increased $294.3 million or 43.4% to $972.7
million, and average interest bearing deposits and other investments declined $74.4 million or 48.5% to $79.0 million.
Commercial and commercial real estate loan
production for 2015 totaled over $147 million, with almost $86 million occurring in the second quarter, and compared to production
for all of 2014 and 2013 of $258 million and $200 million, respectively. Improvements in commercial production have resulted from
general economic conditions and consumer confidence in the State of Florida improving, encouraging commercial customers to expand
and borrow, along with the impact of the new commercial lending offices opened in 2013. Our investment in loan production staff
is focused on hiring commercial lenders for the larger metropolitan markets in which the Company competes, principally in Orlando,
Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale. The addition of BANKshares locations and personnel in the fourth quarter provides the Company with
a significant presence in the Orlando market, as well as the coastal region to the east of Orlando. Prospectively, the merger with
Grand will significantly enhance our presence in Palm Beach. With commercial production improving during 2015 and 2014, period-end
total loans outstanding have increased by $602.2 million or 45.1% since June 30, 2014, and $82.9 million or 17.9% linked quarter
(annualized). At June 30, 2015, the Company’s total commercial and commercial real estate loan pipeline was $109 million,
versus $82 million at March 31, 2015, and versus $30 million, $58 million, $46 million and $60 million at the end of the first,
second, third and fourth quarters of 2014, respectively.
As of June 30, 2015, commercial real estate
(“CRE”) loans were $947.0 million. Under regulatory guidelines for commercial real estate concentrations, Seacoast
National’s applicable commercial real estate loans outstanding at June 30, 2015 (as defined in guidelines) represented 184%
of risk-based capital, which is below the regulatory threshold.
Closed residential mortgage loan production
for the first and second quarters of 2015 totaled $56 million and $82 million, respectively, of which $32 million and $37 million,
respectively, was sold servicing-released. In comparison, closed residential mortgage loan production for the first, second, third
and fourth quarters of 2014 totaled $40 million, $61 million, $66 million and $58 million, respectively, of which $19 million,
$28 million, $35 million and $26 million was sold servicing-released. The majority of our loan production has been focused on purchased
home mortgages. Existing home sales and home mortgage loan refinancing activity in the Company’s markets has improved as
the number of foreclosed properties in Florida has diminished, with improved demand for new home construction emerging.
The cost of average interest-bearing liabilities
in the second quarter of 2015 was one basis point higher than first quarter 2015 and identical to first quarter of 2014’s
rate, reflecting a stable, lower interest rate environment and improved deposit mix. The following table details the cost of average
interest bearing liabilities for the past five quarters:
| |
Second | | |
First | | |
Fourth | | |
Third | | |
Second | |
| |
Quarter | | |
Quarter | | |
Quarter | | |
Quarter | | |
Quarter | |
| |
2015 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2014 | | |
2014 | |
Rate | |
| 0.33 | % | |
| 0.32 | % | |
| 0.31 | % | |
| 0.32 | % | |
| 0.33 | % |
The Company’s retail core deposit
focus has produced strong growth in core deposit customer relationships when compared to prior years. Lower rates paid on interest
bearing deposits during the second quarter 2015 (and last several quarters) have kept the overall cost of total deposits low and
stable at 0.12%, identical to the rate paid for all of 2014. A significant component favorably affecting the Company’s net
interest margin, the average balances of lower cost interest bearing deposits (interest bearing demand, savings and money market)
totaled 83.1% of total average interest bearing deposits during 2015’s second quarter, improving from the average of 80.1%
a year ago, even with the addition of BANKshares’ deposits. Certificate of deposit (“CD”) rates paid were lower
for 2015, averaging 0.42% for the second quarter, an 18 basis point decrease compared to second quarter 2014. Average CDs (the
highest cost component of interest bearing deposits) were 16.9% of interest bearing deposits in 2015, compared to 19.9% for the
second quarter 2014. Prospectively, with interest rates predicted to remain low through 2015, or possibly increase, reductions
in interest bearing deposit costs will be challenging to produce due to limited re-pricing opportunities.
Average deposits totaled $2,598.6
million during the second quarter of 2015, and were $792.7 million higher compared to the second quarter of 2014. The
acquisition of BANKshares on October 1, 2014, with approximately $516.3 million in total deposits contributed to this
increase. Average aggregate amounts for interest bearing demand, savings and money market balances during the second quarter
of 2015 increased $458.3 million or 44.0% to $1,499.1 million compared to the second quarter of 2014, average noninterest
bearing deposits increased $289.8 million or 57.3% to $795.7 million for 2015 compared to 2014, and average CDs increased by
$44.5 million or 17.2% to $303.8 million over the same period. With the low interest rate environment and lower CD rate
offerings available, customers have been more complacent and are leaving more funds in lower cost average balances in savings
and other liquid deposit products that pay no interest or a lower interest rate.
Average short-term borrowings have been
principally comprised of sweep repurchase agreements with customers of Seacoast National, which increased $18.0 million to $168.1
million or 12.0% for the second quarter of 2015 as compared to 2014 for the same period. With balances typically peaking during
the fourth and first quarters each year, public fund clients with larger balances have the most significant influence on average
sweep repurchase agreement balances outstanding during the year. At September 30, 2014, the Company utilized $80 million in term
federal funds purchased from the FHLB at 0.16% (maturing in 30 days) to invest in adjustable rate securities, pending seasonal
funding expected prospectively. Average term federal funds purchased were nominal for the second quarter of 2015, but averaged
$39.0 million during the first quarter of 2015.
For second quarter 2015, average other
borrowings were comprised of subordinated debt of $64.6 million related to trust preferred securities issued by subsidiary trusts
of the Company (including subordinated debt for BANKshares added on October 1, 2014) and advances from the FHLB of $50.0 million.
With the exception of the inherited subordinated debt from BANKshares, no changes have occurred to other borrowings since year-end
2009.
Prospectively, with the acquired
loans paying down and replaced with new loans at lower yields, partially offset by our lending initiatives producing improved
results, and problem loans continuing to decline, we expect our consolidated net interest margin for 2015 will trend near
second quarter’s margin. We believe that we are positioned for stronger earnings performance and improved margin with a
more typical yield curve, with excess liquidity presently deployed into adjustable rate assets. Our focus on
achieving increased household growth year over year should produce future organic revenue growth, as the long term value of
core household relationships are revealed, as more products are sold and fees earned, and as normalized interest rates return
as the economy improves.
Non-GAAP Measures regarding Net Interest Income and Margin
Fully taxable equivalent net interest income
is a common term and measure used in the banking industry but is not a term used under generally accepted accounting principles
(“GAAP”). We believe that these presentations of tax-equivalent net interest income and tax equivalent net interest
margin aid in the comparability of net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources over the periods presented.
We further believe these non-GAAP measures enhance investors’ understanding of the Company’s business and performance,
and facilitate an understanding of performance trends and comparisons with the performance of other financial institutions. The
limitations associated with these measures are the risk that persons might disagree as to the appropriateness of items comprising
these measures and that different companies might calculate these measures differently, including as a result of using different
assumed tax rates. These disclosures should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP. The following information is provided
to reconcile GAAP measures and tax equivalent net interest income and net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis.
| |
Second | | |
First | | |
Fourth | | |
Third | | |
Second | |
| |
Quarter | | |
Quarter | | |
Quarter | | |
Quarter | | |
Quarter | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
2015 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2014 | | |
2014 | |
Nontaxable interest income | |
$ | 122 | | |
$ | 124 | | |
$ | 150 | | |
$ | 54 | | |
$ | 54 | |
Tax Rate | |
| 35 | % | |
| 35 | % | |
| 35 | % | |
| 35 | % | |
| 35 | % |
Net interest income (TE) | |
$ | 25,788 | | |
$ | 25,834 | | |
$ | 24,883 | | |
$ | 17,282 | | |
$ | 16,779 | |
Total net interest income (not TE) | |
| 25,666 | | |
| 25,710 | | |
| 24,733 | | |
| 17,228 | | |
| 16,725 | |
Net interest margin (TE) | |
| 3.50 | % | |
| 3.62 | % | |
| 3.56 | % | |
| 3.17 | % | |
| 3.10 | % |
Net interest margin (not TE) | |
| 3.48 | | |
| 3.60 | | |
| 3.54 | | |
| 3.16 | | |
| 3.09 | |
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
Management determines the provision for
loan losses charged to operations by continually analyzing and monitoring delinquencies, nonperforming loans and the level of outstanding
balances for each loan category, as well as the amount of net charge-offs, and by estimating losses inherent in its portfolio.
While the Company’s policies and procedures used to estimate the provision for loan losses charged to operations are considered
adequate by management, factors beyond the control of the Company, such as general economic conditions, both locally and nationally,
make management’s judgment as to the adequacy of the provision and allowance for loan losses necessarily approximate and
imprecise (see “Nonperforming Assets” and “Allowance for Loan Losses”).
Noncore credit related expenses, losses
on other real estate owned (“OREO”) and asset disposition expense, have declined as nonperforming assets decreased
and the economy improved. We expect these costs, as well as the provision for loan losses, have normalized and are likely to continue
at levels near those recognized during the first half of 2015, with loan growth the primary driver. During the first half
of 2015, net loan loss recoveries of $432,000 were achieved and provisioning for loan losses of $1.3 million was recorded, reflective
of the $115.5 million increase in loans outstanding since December 31, 2014 (see “Loan Porfolio” and “Allowance
for Loan Losses”).
For the first and second quarter of
2015 we recorded a provision of the allowance for loan losses of $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, which compared
to a recapture of the allowance for loan losses in the first and second quarters of 2014 totaling $0.7 million and $1.4
million, respectively. Net recoveries for the first and second quarters of 2015 were each $0.2 million, compared to net
recoveries of $0.1 million in each of the first and second quarters of 2014. Net recoveries represented 0.05% of average
total loans for the first six months of 2015, versus net recoveries of 0.04% of average total loans for the first half of
2014. Delinquency trends remain low and show continued stability (see “Nonperforming Assets”).
Note F to the financial statements (titled
“Impaired Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses”) provides additional information concerning the Company’s allowance
and provisioning for loan losses.
NONINTEREST INCOME
Noninterest income (excluding securities
gains or losses) totaled $8.8 million for the second quarter of 2015, $3.0 million 50.0% higher than 2014’s second quarter
and $1.5 million or 21.0% above the first quarter 2015. Noninterest income accounted for 25.6% of total revenue (net interest
income plus noninterest income, excluding securities gains or losses) during the second quarter of 2015, compared to 26.1% a year
ago. Year over year growth in all categories of noninterest income reflects strength in customer acquisition and cross sell, as
well as benefits of the successful BANKshares customer integration. Linked quarter noninterest income improvement resulted from
continued household growth.
Noninterest income for the second quarter
of 2015, compared to first quarter 2015 and the second quarter of 2014, is detailed as follows:
| |
Second | | |
First | | |
Second | |
| |
Quarter | | |
Quarter | | |
Quarter | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
2015 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Service charges on deposits | |
$ | 2,115 | | |
$ | 2,002 | | |
$ | 1,484 | |
Trust income | |
| 759 | | |
| 801 | | |
| 703 | |
Mortgage banking fees | |
| 1,032 | | |
| 1,088 | | |
| 855 | |
Brokerage commissions and fees | |
| 576 | | |
| 441 | | |
| 410 | |
Marine finance fees | |
| 492 | | |
| 197 | | |
| 340 | |
Interchange income | |
| 2,033 | | |
| 1,737 | | |
| 1,514 | |
Other deposit-based EFT fees | |
| 96 | | |
| 114 | | |
| 83 | |
BOLI Income | |
| 334 | | |
| 330 | | |
| 0 | |
Gain on participated loan | |
| 725 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | |
Other income | |
| 684 | | |
| 598 | | |
| 507 | |
Total | |
$ | 8,846 | | |
$ | 7,308 | | |
$ | 5,896 | |
For the second quarter of 2015, revenues
from the Company’s wealth management services businesses (trust and brokerage) increased by $222,000 or 19.9% year over year
versus second quarter 2014, and were higher for the first six months of 2015 compared to 2014 by $414,000 or 19.1%. Included in
the $222,000 increase from a year ago, trust revenue was higher by $56,000 or 8.0% and brokerage commissions and fees increased
by $166,000 or 40.5%. Higher agency fees were the primary cause for the overall increase in trust revenue versus second quarter
2014, increasing $38,000, and reflect improving financial markets and new pricing effective in the third quarter of 2014. The $166,000
overall growth in brokerage commissions and fees included an increase in income from the sale of annuities of $129,000.
Service charges on deposits for the second
quarter of 2015 were $631,000 or 42.5% higher year over year versus second quarter 2014’s result, and were $1,126,000 or
37.6% higher for the first six months of 2015 when compared to the same period in 2014. Service charges have improved due to core
customer acquisition. The regulators continue to review the banking industry’s practices around overdraft programs and additional
regulation could reduce fee income for the Company’s overdraft services. Service charge increases in 2015 reflect our growing
base of core deposit relationships over the past twelve months, including the addition of BANKshares customers in the fourth quarter
2014, and our emphasis to provide products meeting the needs of each customer that generate appropriate fees for the services offered.
Greater usage of check or debit cards over
the past several years by core deposit customers and an increased cardholder base has increased our interchange income. For the
second quarter of 2015, interchange income increased $519,000 or 34.3% compared to second quarter 2014, and was $853,000 or 29.2%
higher during the first half of 2015 versus 2014’s income. Other deposit-based electronic funds transfer (“EFT”)
income was higher as well compared to a year ago for the second quarter and year-to-date through June 30, increasing by $13,000
and $29,000, respectively. Interchange revenue is dependent upon business volumes transacted, as well as the fees permitted by
VISA® and MasterCard®. The Dodd-Frank Act regulation has not impacted this source of fee revenue
for Seacoast National materially, but did reduce fees collected by larger financial institutions.
The Company originates residential mortgage
loans in its markets, with loans processed by commissioned employees of Seacoast National. Many of these mortgage loans are referred
by the Company’s branch personnel. Mortgage banking fees in the second quarter of 2015 increased $177,000 or 20.7% from 2014’s
second quarter result, and were $604,000 or 39.8% greater for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to last year for the
same period. Mortgage banking revenue as a component of overall noninterest income was 13.1% year-to-date for 2015, compared to
12.4% for all of 2014. The Company was the number one originator of home purchase mortgages in Martin, St. Lucie and Indian River
counties during 2014 and the first five months of 2015, based on the data available to date.
Marine financing had particularly good
results during the second quarter of 2015, with fees from the non-recourse sale of marine loans increasing $152,000 or 44.7% from
second quarter in 2014, thereby lifting income by $95,000 or 16.0% higher for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to 2014
for the same period. The Seacoast Marine Division originated $59 million in loans during the first six months of 2015, of which
65% were sold, with the remaining $21 million placed in the loan portfolio. In comparison, originations totaled $52 million during
the first six months of 2014, of which 73% were sold. The Seacoast Marine Division is headquartered in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
with lending professionals in Florida, California, Washington and Oregon.
Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”)
investments were transferred to the Company from BANKshares, and were added to by policies directly acquired by us during the fourth
quarter of 2014. BOLI income of $334,000, $330,000 and $252,000 was recognized during the second and first quarters of 2015 and
fourth quarter of 2014, respectively. The addition of these investments is expected to provide approximately $1.3 million in tax
exempt revenues in 2015. No BOLI investments existed for the Company previously.
A gain on a participated loan of $725,000
was realized during the second quarter of 2015, with no amounts to compare to for 2014. Accounting treatment for this gain, related
to a discount accreted on a BANKshares loan that was participated during the second quarter of 2015, required this income to be
included in other operating income rather than recognition through the margin.
NONINTEREST EXPENSES
For the second quarter of 2015, the overhead
ratio was 68.6% and noninterest expenses totaled $24.3 million versus $20.7million a year ago and $23.2 million in the first quarter
of 2015. Noninterest expenses for second quarter 2015 included the addition of personnel and premises from the receivables funding
team at FGC that contributed approximately $351,000 in expense, production driven commission expense that added $375,000, and marketing
expense focused on customer acquisition and corporate branding in BANKshare’s Orlando footprint that contributed $250,000
to the increase. Additionally, merger related expenses increased $60,000 from the first quarter 2015.
Salaries and wages totaling $9.3 million
were $1.5 million or 19.7% higher for the second quarter of 2015 than the second quarter of 2014. Base salaries were $1.6 million
or 23.6% higher, reflecting additional personnel retained as part of the fourth quarter acquisition of BANKshares. The addition
of FGC personnel in receivable funding were incremental as well, comprising $232,000 of the increase during the second quarter
of 2015. Improved revenue generation and lending production resulted in commissions, cash and stock incentives that (aggregated)
were $986,000 higher compared to second quarter a year ago, but that were partially offset by deferred loan origination costs (a
contra expense), higher by $1.3 million . For the six months ended June 30, 2015, salaries and wages were $2.7 million or 17.5%
higher than the comparable period in 2014.
In the second quarter of 2015, employee
benefits costs increased by $460,000 or 22.1% to $2.5 million from a year ago. These costs reflect the increased staffing and salary
costs, discussed above.
Seacoast National utilizes third parties
for its core data processing systems and outsourced data processing costs are directly related to the number of transactions processed.
Outsourced data processing costs totaled $2.2 million for the second quarter of 2015, an increase of $423,000 or 23.4% from a year
ago, and were $912,000 or 26.0% higher for first six months of 2015, when compared to the same period in 2014. Increased data processing
costs are primarily due to rising transaction volumes and the addition of BANKshares volumes in the fourth quarter of 2014. Outsourced
data processing costs can be expected to increase as the Company’s business volumes grow. We continue to improve and enhance
our mobile and other digital products and services through our core data processor, which will likely increase our outsourced data
processing costs as customers adopt improvements and products.
Telephone and data line expenditures,
including electronic communications with customers and between branch locations and personnel, as well as third party data
processors, increased $137,000 or 44.8% to $443,000 for 2015 when compared to second quarter 2014, and were $340,000 or 56.8% higher
for the first half of 2015 versus 2014’s first six months. The addition of BANKshares locations and customers were the primary
contributor to the increase.
Total occupancy, furniture and equipment
expenses for the second quarter of 2015 increased $338,000 or 13.6% (on an aggregate basis) to $2.8 million year over year versus
2014’s second quarter expense. Year-to-date through June 30, 2015, these expenses were $684,000 or 14.0% greater than for
2014. This increase was primarily driven by the twelve branches acquired in the BANKshares acquisition. Branch consolidations during
the fourth quarter of 2014 lessened the impact of the acquired locations. Branch consolidations are likely to continue for the
Company and the banking industry in general, as customers increase their usage of digital and mobile products thereby lessening
the necessity to visit offices.
For the second quarter of 2015, marketing
expenses, including sales promotion costs, ad agency production and printing costs, digital, newspaper, TV and radio advertising,
and other public relations costs associated with the new markets acquired and increased by $551,000 or 81.6% to $1.2 million when
compared to the second quarter of 2014, and were $251,000 higher than the first quarter of 2015. Year-to-date these costs were
$713,000 or 47.9% higher, versus 2014. Primary to the increase from the first quarter of 2015 were efforts to solidify customer
acquisition and corporate branding in BANKshare’s Orlando footprint that contributed $250,000. Customer acquisition costs
drove additional expense compared to the prior year. Our marketing expenditures reflect a tailored, focused campaign in our markets
targeting the customers of competing financial institutions and promoting our brand.
Legal and professional fees were lower
by $682,000 or 30.0% from the second quarter a year ago, and were nominally higher for the first six months of 2015, versus 2014.
Second quarter 2014 included $1,205,000 related to the acquisition of BANKshares. Included in second quarter 2015 were $530,000
in acquisition related fees for Grand.
FDIC assessments were higher, totaling
$520,000 for the second quarter of 2015, compared to $411,000 for the second quarter of 2014. Fees for the first half of 2015 compared
to 2014 for the same period were $312,000 or 39.1% greater. The increase reflects the increase in premiums paid as a result of
the merger with BANKshares.
Amortization of core deposit intangibles
totaled $315,000 for the first and second quarters of 2015 (a total of $630,000 for 2015), compared to $196,000 for the same quarters
in 2014 (a total of $392,000). The increase is attributable to the amortization of core deposit intangible from the BANKshares
merger. All other core deposit intangibles from prior acquisitions were fully amortized at year-end 2014.
Net losses on other real estate owned (“OREO”)
and repossessed assets, and asset disposition expenses associated with the management of OREO and repossessed assets (aggregated)
totaled $224,000 and $226,000 for the first and second quarters of 2015. In comparison, these costs totaled $181,000, $210,000,
$295,000 and $112,000 for the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2014, respectively. These costs have moderated, with
OREO balances for non-acquired properties declining by $1.3 million since June 30, 2015, to total $4.9 million at June 30, 2015.
The Company expects these costs to continue to remain lower prospectively, as property values are improving.
Remaining expenses were higher by $601,000
or 24.4% for the second quarter 2015 compared to a year ago, totaling $3.1 million. Year-to-date for 2015, remaining expenses were
$1.3 million or 29.2% higher, compared to 2014. Larger increases during the second quarter of 2015 were driven by the BANKshares
acquisition, and variable costs related to the successful lending activity.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company’s equity capital at
June 30, 2015 has increased $92.4 million to $326.9 million since June 30, 2014, and the ratio of shareholders’
equity to period end total assets was 10.11% at June 30, 2015, the same as at December 31, 2014. During the fourth
quarter of 2014, the BANKshares transaction increased shareholders’ equity $76.8 million as we issued shares of common
stock as consideration for the merger.
Seacoast’s management uses certain
“non-GAAP” financial measures in its analysis of the Company’s capital adequacy. Seacoast’s management
uses these measures to assess the quality of capital and believes that investors may find it useful in their analysis of the Company.
The capital measures are not necessarily comparable to similar capital measures that may be presented by other companies.
Capital ratios remain healthy and are well
above regulatory requirements for well-capitalized institutions.
The Company and Seacoast National are subject
to various general regulatory policies and requirements relating to the payment of dividends, including requirements to maintain
adequate capital above regulatory minimums. The appropriate federal bank regulatory authority may prohibit the payment of dividends
where it has determined that the payment of dividends would be an unsafe or unsound practice. The Company is a legal entity separate
and distinct from Seacoast National and its other subsidiaries, and the Company’s primary source of cash and liquidity, other
than securities offerings and borrowings, is dividends from its bank subsidiary. Without Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
(“OCC”) approval, Seacoast National can pay over $71 million of dividends to the Company.
The OCC and the Federal Reserve have policies
that encourage banks and bank holding companies to pay dividends from current earnings, and have the general authority to limit
the dividends paid by national banks and bank holding companies, respectively, if such payment may be deemed to constitute an unsafe
or unsound practice. If, in the particular circumstances, either of these federal regulators determined that the payment of dividends
would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice, either the OCC or the Federal Reserve may, among other things, issue a
cease and desist order prohibiting the payment of dividends by Seacoast National or us, respectively. Under a recently adopted
Federal Reserve policy, the board of directors of a bank holding company must consider different factors to ensure that its dividend
level is prudent relative to the organization’s financial position and is not based on overly optimistic earnings scenarios
such as any potential events that may occur before the payment date that could affect its ability to pay, while still maintaining
a strong financial position. As a general matter, the Federal Reserve has indicated that the board of directors of a bank holding
company, such as Seacoast, should consult with the Federal Reserve and eliminate, defer, or significantly reduce the bank holding
company’s dividends if: (i) its net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously
paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends; (ii) its prospective rate of earnings retention is not
consistent with its capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition; or (iii) it will not meet, or is in
danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios.
At June 30, 2015, the Company’s deposit-taking
bank subsidiary met the capital and leverage ratio requirements for well capitalized banks.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets increased $939.4 million or
40.9% from June 30, 2014 to $3.2 billion at June 30, 2015. The acquisition of BANKshares added to our success in driving organic
loan growth to achieve this balance sheet success.
LOAN PORTFOLIO
Total loans (net of unearned income) were
$1.9 billion at June 30, 2015, $602.2 million or 45.1% more than at June 30, 2014, and $115.5 million or 6.3% more than at December
31, 2014. The BANKshares acquisition on October 1, 2014 contributed $365 million in loans. The Company continues to look for opportunities
to invest excess liquidity, and believes the best current use is to fund loan growth. Additional new commercial relationship managers
hired over the past three years have increased loan growth, and are expected to continue to do so prospectively. The following
tables detail loan portfolio composition at June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014:
June 30, 2015 | |
Portfolio Loans | | |
PCI Loans | | |
PUL's | | |
Total | |
| |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Construction and land development | |
$ | 79,645 | | |
$ | 1,489 | | |
$ | 14,044 | | |
$ | 95,178 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 693,210 | | |
| 3,350 | | |
| 195,768 | | |
| 892,328 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 657,247 | | |
| 506 | | |
| 38,024 | | |
| 695,777 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 153,456 | | |
| 1,217 | | |
| 35,652 | | |
| 190,325 | |
Consumer | |
| 61,423 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 1,490 | | |
| 62,913 | |
Other loans | |
| 878 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 878 | |
NET LOAN BALANCES | |
$ | 1,645,859 | | |
$ | 6,562 | | |
$ | 284,978 | | |
$ | 1,937,399 | |
December 31, 2014 | |
Portfolio Loans | | |
PCI Loans | | |
PUL's | | |
Total | |
| |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Construction and land development | |
$ | 65,896 | | |
$ | 1,557 | | |
$ | 19,583 | | |
$ | 87,036 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 610,863 | | |
| 4,092 | | |
| 222,192 | | |
| 837,147 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 639,428 | | |
| 851 | | |
| 46,618 | | |
| 686,897 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 120,763 | | |
| 1,312 | | |
| 35,321 | | |
| 157,396 | |
Consumer | |
| 50,543 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 2,352 | | |
| 52,897 | |
Other loans | |
| 512 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 512 | |
NET LOAN BALANCES | |
$ | 1,488,005 | | |
$ | 7,814 | | |
$ | 326,066 | | |
$ | 1,821,885 | |
June 30, 2014 | |
Portfolio Loans | | |
PCI Loans | | |
PUL's | | |
Total | |
| |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Construction and land development | |
$ | 57,393 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 57,393 | |
Commercial real estate | |
| 538,217 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 538,217 | |
Residential real estate | |
| 606,796 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 606,796 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 87,285 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 87,285 | |
Consumer | |
| 45,241 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 45,241 | |
Other loans | |
| 260 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 260 | |
NET LOAN BALANCES | |
$ | 1,335,192 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 1,335,192 | |
The Company defines commercial real estate
in accordance with the guidance on “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending” (the “Guidance”)
issued by the federal bank regulatory agencies in 2006.
Commercial real estate mortgages were higher
by $354.1 million or 60.7% to $892.3 million at June 30, 2015, compared to June 30, 2014, a result of improving loan production
and loans acquired in the merger.
The Company’s ten largest commercial
real estate funded and unfunded loan relationships at June 30, 2015 aggregated to $114.1 million (versus $106.4 million a
year ago) and for the 40 commercial real estate relationships in excess of $5 million the aggregate funded and unfunded totaled
$319.9 million, of which $272.7 million was funded (compared to 29 relationships of $221.8 million a year ago, of which $194.4
million was funded).
Commercial real estate mortgage loans,
excluding construction and development loans, were comprised of the following loan types at June 30, 2015 and 2014:
| |
June 30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
(In millions) | |
Funded | | |
Unfunded | | |
Total | | |
Funded | | |
Unfunded | | |
Total | |
Office buildings | |
$ | 236.1 | | |
$ | 7.2 | | |
$ | 243.3 | | |
$ | 122.8 | | |
$ | 2.5 | | |
$ | 125.3 | |
Retail trade | |
| 199.8 | | |
| 0.5 | | |
| 200.3 | | |
| 142.8 | | |
| 1.3 | | |
| 144.1 | |
Industrial | |
| 176.7 | | |
| 5.7 | | |
| 182.4 | | |
| 82.2 | | |
| 0.6 | | |
| 82.8 | |
Healthcare | |
| 55.2 | | |
| 0.5 | | |
| 55.7 | | |
| 41.6 | | |
| 1.0 | | |
| 42.6 | |
Churches and educational facilities | |
| 29.2 | | |
| 0.3 | | |
| 29.5 | | |
| 26.7 | | |
| 0.0 | | |
| 26.7 | |
Recreation | |
| 3.1 | | |
| 0.0 | | |
| 3.1 | | |
| 3.3 | | |
| 0.1 | | |
| 3.4 | |
Multifamily | |
| 25.4 | | |
| 1.8 | | |
| 27.2 | | |
| 18.7 | | |
| 0.0 | | |
| 18.7 | |
Mobile home parks | |
| 1.5 | | |
| 0.0 | | |
| 1.5 | | |
| 1.7 | | |
| 0.0 | | |
| 1.7 | |
Lodging | |
| 28.4 | | |
| 0.0 | | |
| 28.4 | | |
| 17.0 | | |
| 0.0 | | |
| 17.0 | |
Restaurant | |
| 4.9 | | |
| 0.0 | | |
| 4.9 | | |
| 3.9 | | |
| 0.0 | | |
| 3.9 | |
Agriculture | |
| 2.5 | | |
| 0.8 | | |
| 3.3 | | |
| 4.6 | | |
| 1.2 | | |
| 5.8 | |
Convenience stores | |
| 22.8 | | |
| 0.0 | | |
| 22.8 | | |
| 20.9 | | |
| 0.8 | | |
| 21.7 | |
Marina | |
| 19.5 | | |
| 0.0 | | |
| 19.5 | | |
| 18.5 | | |
| 0.0 | | |
| 18.5 | |
Other | |
| 87.2 | | |
| 2.3 | | |
| 89.5 | | |
| 33.5 | | |
| 0.7 | | |
| 34.2 | |
Total | |
$ | 892.3 | | |
$ | 19.1 | | |
$ | 911.4 | | |
$ | 538.2 | | |
$ | 8.2 | | |
$ | 546.4 | |
Fixed rate and adjustable rate loans secured
by commercial real estate, excluding construction loans, totaled approximately $654 million and $239 million, respectively, at
June 30, 2015, compared to $354 million and $184 million, respectively, a year ago.
Exposure to market interest rate volatility
with respect to long-term fixed rate mortgage loans held for investment is managed by attempting to match maturities and re-pricing
opportunities and through loan sales of most fixed rate product. For the first and second quarters of 2015, closed residential
mortgage loan production totaled $56 million and $82 million, respectively, of which $32 million and $37 million, respectively,
of fixed rate loans were sold servicing-released while adjustable products were added to the portfolio. In comparison, closed residential
mortgage loan production for the first and second quarters of 2014 totaled $40 million and $61 million, respectively, of which
$19 million and $28 million was sold servicing-released.
Adjustable and fixed rate residential real
estate mortgages were higher at June 30, 2015, by $25.3 million or 6.2% and $10.6 million or 11.6%, respectively, compared
to a year ago. At June 30, 2015, approximately $433 million or 62% of the Company’s residential mortgage balances were
adjustable, compared to $408 million or 67% at June 30, 2014. Loans secured by residential properties having fixed rates totaled
approximately $102 million at June 30, 2015, of which 15- and 30-year mortgages totaled approximately $23 million and $79
million, respectively. The remaining fixed rate balances were comprised of home improvement loans, most with maturities of 10 years
or less, that increased $13.0 million or 23.7% since June 30, 2014. In comparison, loans secured by residential properties having
fixed rates totaled approximately $91 million at June 30, 2014, with 15- and 30-year fixed rate residential mortgages totaling
approximately $21 million and $70 million, respectively. The Company also has a growing home equity line portfolio, primarily floating
rates, totaling approximately $93 million at June 30, 2015, higher than the $53 million that was outstanding at June 30, 2014,
and validating improving property values.
Reflecting the impact of improved
economic conditions and the BankFIRST acquisition, commercial loans outstanding at second quarter end 2015 increased to
$190.3 million, more than doubling from $87.3 million a year ago. Commercial lending activities are directed principally
towards businesses whose demand for funds are within the Company’s lending limits, such as small- to medium-sized
professional firms, retail and wholesale outlets, and light industrial and manufacturing concerns. Such businesses are
smaller and subject to the risks of lending to small to medium sized businesses, including, but not limited to, the effects
of a downturn in the local economy, possible business failure, and insufficient cash flows.
At June 30, 2015, the Company had
commitments to make loans of $320 million, compared to $159 million at June 30, 2014.
Loan Concentrations
Over the past five years, the Company has
been pursuing an aggressive program to reduce exposure to loan types that have been most impacted by stressed market conditions
in order to achieve lower levels of credit loss volatility. Commercial loan relationships greater than $10 million were reduced
by $76.5 million to $85.1 million at June 30, 2015 compared with year-end 2010.
Commercial Loans Greater than $10 Million
| |
June 30, | | |
December 31, | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2012 | | |
2011 | | |
2010 | |
Performing | |
$ | 85,138 | | |
$ | 95,893 | | |
$ | 64,224 | | |
$ | 77,321 | | |
$ | 84,610 | | |
$ | 112,469 | |
Performing TDR* | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 10,431 | | |
| 25,494 | | |
| 28,286 | |
Nonaccrual | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 20,913 | |
Total | |
$ | 85,138 | | |
$ | 95,893 | | |
$ | 64,224 | | |
$ | 87,752 | | |
$ | 110,104 | | |
$ | 161,668 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Top 10 Customer Loan | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Relationships | |
$ | 114,077 | | |
$ | 114,632 | | |
$ | 104,145 | | |
$ | 115,506 | | |
$ | 128,739 | | |
$ | 151,503 | |
*TDR = Troubled debt restructures
Concentrations in total construction and
development loans and total commercial real estate (CRE) loans have also been substantially reduced. As shown in the table below,
under regulatory guidance for construction and land development and commercial real estate loan concentrations as a percentage
of total risk based capital, Seacoast National’s loan portfolio in these categories (as defined in the guidance) have improved.
| |
June 30, | | |
December 31, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2012 | | |
2011 | | |
2010 | |
Construction and land development loans to total risk based capital | |
| 29 | % | |
| 31 | % | |
| 30 | % | |
| 28 | % | |
| 22 | % | |
| 39 | % |
CRE loans to total risk based capital | |
| 184 | % | |
| 197 | % | |
| 172 | % | |
| 164 | % | |
| 174 | % | |
| 218 | % |
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Management continuously monitors
the quality of the loan portfolio and maintains an allowance for loan losses it believes sufficient to absorb probable
losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses totaled $18.8 million at June 30, 2015, compared to
$18.1 million at June 30, 2014. This amount was $1.7 million more than at December 31, 2014, reflecting the growth in the
portfolio. The allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”) framework has four basic elements. Specific allowances for
loans individually evaluated for impairment. General allowances for pools of homogeneous non-purchased loans
(“portfolio loans”) within the portfolio that have similar risk characteristics, which are not individually
evaluated. Specific allowances for purchased impaired loans which are individually evaluated based on the loans expected
principal and interest cash flows. General allowances for purchased unimpaired pools of homogeneous loans that have similar
risk characteristics. The aggregate of these four components results in our total allowance for loan losses.
The first element of the ALLL analysis
involves the estimation of allowance specific to individually evaluated impaired portfolio loans, including accruing and nonaccruing
restructured commercial and consumer loans. In this process, a specific allowance is established for impaired loans based on an
analysis of the most probable sources of repayment, including discounted cash flows, liquidation of collateral, or the market value
of the loan itself. It is the Company’s policy to charge off any portion of the loan deemed a loss. Restructured consumer
loans are also evaluated in this element of the estimate. As of June 30, 2015, the specific allowance related to impaired
loans individually evaluated totaled $3.1 million, compared to $4.7 million as of June 30, 2014.
The second element of the ALLL analysis,
the general allowance for homogeneous portfolio loan pools not individually evaluated, is determined by applying allowance factors
to pools of loans within the portfolio that have similar risk characteristics. The general allowance factors are determined using
a baseline factor that is developed from an analysis of historical net charge-off experience and qualitative factors designed and
intended to measure expected losses. These baseline factors are developed and applied to the various portfolio loan pools. Adjustments
may be made to baseline reserves for some of the loan pools based on an assessment of internal and external influences on credit
quality not fully reflected in the historical loss. These influences may include elements such as changes in concentration risk,
macroeconomic conditions, and/or recent observable asset quality trends.
The third component consists of amounts
reserved for purchased credit-impaired loans. On a quarterly basis, the Company updates the amount of loan principal and interest
cash flows expected to be collected, incorporating assumptions regarding default rates, loss severities, the amounts and timing
of prepayments and other factors that are reflective of current market conditions. Probable decreases in expected loan principal
cash flows trigger the recognition of impairment, which is then measured as the present value of the expected principal loss plus
any related foregone interest cash flows discounted at the pool’s effective interest rate. Impairments that occur after the
acquisition date are recognized through the provision for loan losses. Probable and significant increases in expected principal
cash flows would first reverse any previously recorded allowance for loan losses; any remaining increases are recognized prospectively
as interest income. The impacts of (i) prepayments, (ii) changes in variable interest rates, and (iii) any other changes in the
timing of expected cash flows are recognized prospectively as adjustments to interest income. Disposals of loans, which may include
sales of loans, receipt of payments in full by the borrower, or foreclosure, result in removal of the loan from the purchased credit
impaired portfolio.
The final component consists of amounts
reserved for purchased unimpaired loans. Loans collectively evaluated for impairment reported at June 30, 2015 include loans acquired
from BANKshares on October 1, 2014 that are not PCI loans. These loans are performing loans recorded at estimated fair value at
the acquisition date. This amount will accrete into interest income over the remaining lives of the related loans on a level yield
basis, but remains adequate at June 30, 2015.
Our analyses of the adequacy of the allowance
for loan losses also takes into account qualitative factors such as credit quality, loan concentrations, internal controls, audit
results, staff turnover, local market conditions and loan growth.
The Company’s independent Credit
Administration Department assigns all loss factors to the individual internal risk ratings based on an estimate of the risk using
a variety of tools and information. Its estimate includes consideration of the general economic environment which is incorporated
into the overall allowance. In addition, the portfolio loans are segregated into a graded loan portfolio, residential, installment,
home equity, and unsecured signature lines, and loss factors are calculated for each portfolio.
The loss factors assigned to the graded
loan portfolio are based on the historical migration of actual losses by grade over 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 quarter intervals.
Minimum and maximum average historical loss rates over one to five years are referenced in setting the loss factors by grade within
the graded portfolio. Management uses historical loss factors as its starting point, and qualitative elements are considered to
capture trends within each portion of the graded portfolio. The direction and expectations of past dues, charge-offs, nonaccruals,
classified loans, portfolio mix, market conditions, and risk management controls are considered in setting loss factors for the
graded portfolio. The loan loss migration indicates that the minimum and maximum average loss rates and median loss rates over
the past many quarters have been declining. Also, the level of criticized and classified loans has been declining as a result of
a combination of upgrades, loan payoff and loan sales, which are reducing the risk profile of the loan portfolio. Additionally,
the risk profile has declined given the shift in complexion of the graded portfolio, particularly a reduced level of commercial
real estate loan concentrations.
Residential and consumer loans
(installment, secured lines, and unsecured lines) are analyzed differently as risk ratings, or grades, are not assigned to
individual loans. Residential and consumer loan losses are tracked by pool. Management examines the historical losses over
one to five years in its determination of the appropriate loss factor for vintages of loans currently in the portfolio rather
than the vintages that produced the significant losses in prior years. These loss factors are then adjusted by qualitative
factors determined by management to reflect potential probable losses inherent in each loan pool. Qualitative factors may
include various loan or property types, loan to value, concentrations and economic and environmental factors.
Residential loans that become 90 days past
due are placed on nonaccrual and a specific allowance is made for any loan that becomes 120 days past due. Residential loans are
subsequently written down if they become 180 days past due and such write-downs are supported by a current appraisal, consistent
with current banking regulations.
Our charge-off policy meets or exceeds
regulatory minimums. Losses on unsecured consumer loans are recognized at 90 days past due compared to the regulatory loss criteria
of 120 days. Secured consumer loans, including residential real estate, are typically charged-off or charged down between 120 and
180 days past due, depending on the collateral type, in compliance with Federal Financial Institution Examination Council guidelines.
Commercial loans and real estate loans are typically placed on nonaccrual status when principal or interest is past due for 90
days or more, unless the loan is both secured by collateral having realizable value sufficient to discharge the debt in-full and
the loan is in the legal process of collection. Secured loans may be charged-down to the estimated value of the collateral with
previously accrued unpaid interest reversed. Subsequent charge-offs may be required as a result of changes in the market value
of collateral or other repayment prospects. Initial charge-off amounts are based on valuation estimates derived from appraisals,
broker price opinions, or other market information. Generally, new appraisals are not received until the foreclosure process is
completed; however, collateral values are evaluated periodically based on market information and incremental charge-offs are recorded
if it is determined that collateral values have declined from their initial estimates.
Management continually evaluates the allowance
for loan losses methodology and seeks to refine and enhance this process as appropriate. As a result, it is likely that the methodology
will continue to evolve over time.
Our Loan Review unit is independent, and
performs loan reviews and evaluates a representative sample of credit extensions after the fact for appropriate individual internal
risk ratings. Loan Review has the authority to change internal risk ratings and is responsible for assessing the adequacy of credit
underwriting. This unit reports directly to the Directors’ Loan Committee of Seacoast National’s board of directors.
Net recoveries for the first and second
quarters of 2015 totaled $217,000 and $217,000, respectively, compared to net recoveries of $139,000 and $112,000 for the same
periods in 2014. Note F to the financial statements (titled “Impaired Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses”) summarizes
the Company’s allocation of the allowance for loan losses to construction and land development loans, commercial and residential
real estate loans, commercial and financial loans, and consumer loans, and provides more specific detail regarding charge-offs
and recoveries for each loan component and the composition of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Although
there is no assurance that we will not have elevated charge-offs in the future, we believe that we have significantly reduced the
risks in our loan portfolio and that with stabilizing market conditions, future charge-offs should continue to decline.
The allowance as a percentage of portfolio
loans outstanding was 0.97% at June 30, 2015, compared to 1.36% at June 30, 2014. Excluding acquired loans, the allowance
as a percentage of portfolio loans outstanding was 1.10% at June 30, 2015, compared to 1.36% at June 30, 2014. The allowance for
loan losses represents management’s estimate of an amount adequate in relation to the risk of losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. The reduced level of impaired loans contributed to a lower risk of loss and the lower allowance for loan losses as of
June 30, 2015, compared to June 30, 2014. The risk profile of the loan portfolio has been reduced by implementing a program to
decrease the level of credit risk in such portfolio by strengthening credit management methodologies and implementing a low risk
“back-to-basics” strategic plan for loan growth. New loan production has shifted to adjustable rate residential real
estate loans, owner-occupied commercial real estate, small business loans for professionals and businesses, and consumer lending.
Strategies, processes and controls are in place to ensure that new production is well underwritten and maintains a focus on smaller,
diversified and lower-risk lending. Aided by initiatives embodied in new loan programs and continued aggressive collection actions
and the acquired loans, the portfolio mix has changed dramatically and has become more diversified. The improved mix is most evident
by a lower percentage of loans in income producing commercial real estate and construction and land development loans. Prospectively,
we anticipate that the allowance will likely benefit from continued improvement in our credit quality, but offset by more normal
loan growth as business activity and the economy continues to improve.
Concentrations of credit risk, discussed
under the caption “Loan Portfolio” of this discussion and analysis, can affect the level of the allowance and may involve
loans to one borrower, an affiliated group of borrowers, borrowers engaged in or dependent upon the same industry, or a group of
borrowers whose loans are predicated on the same type of collateral. The Company’s most significant concentration of credit
is a portfolio of loans secured by real estate. At June 30, 2015, the Company had $1.683 billion in loans secured by real estate,
representing 86.9% of total loans, up from $1.202 billion but slightly lower as a percent of total loans (versus 90.1%) at June 30,
2014. In addition, the Company is subject to a geographic concentration of credit because it only operates in central and southeastern
Florida.
While it is the Company’s policy
to charge off in the current period loans in which a loss is considered probable, there are additional risks of future losses that
cannot be quantified precisely or attributed to particular loans or classes of loans. Because these risks include the state of
the economy, borrower payment behaviors and local market conditions as well as conditions affecting individual borrowers, management’s
judgment of the allowance is necessarily approximate and imprecise. The allowance is also subject to regulatory examinations and
determinations as to adequacy, which may take into account such factors as the methodology used to calculate the allowance for
loan losses and the size of the allowance for loan losses in comparison to a group of peer companies identified by the regulatory
agencies.
In assessing the adequacy of the allowance,
management relies predominantly on its ongoing review of the loan portfolio, which is undertaken both to ascertain whether there
are probable losses that must be charged off and to assess the risk characteristics of the portfolio in aggregate. This review
considers the judgments of management, and also those of bank regulatory agencies that review the loan portfolio as part of their
regular examination process. Our bank regulators have generally agreed with our credit assessment, however in the future, regulators
could seek additional provisions to our allowance for loan losses, which would reduce our earnings.
NONPERFORMING ASSETS
Nonperforming assets (“NPAs”)
at June 30, 2015 totaled $25.5 million and were comprised of $15.1 million of nonaccrual portfolio loans, $4.5 million of
nonaccrual purchased loans, $4.8 million of non-acquired other real estate owned (“OREO”) and $1.1 million of acquired
OREO. In comparison, NPAs, at June 30, 2014 totaled $27.9 million (comprised of $21.7 million in nonaccrual loans and $6.2
million of OREO). At June 30, 2015, approximately 98.8% of nonaccrual loans were secured with real estate, the remainder principally
by marine vessels, automobiles and trucks. At June 30, 2015, nonaccrual loans have been written down by approximately $4.7
million or 20.9% of the original loan balance (including specific impairment reserves).
As anticipated, the Company closed a number
of OREO sales during the last twelve months that reduced non-acquired OREO outstanding. Since June 30, 2014, non-acquired OREO
has declined $1.3 million or 21.7%. This is reflective of our improving credit quality.
The table below shows the nonperforming
loan inflows by quarter for 2015, 2014 and 2013:
New Nonperforming Loans | |
| | |
| | |
| |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
First quarter | |
$ | 2,576 | | |
$ | 1,651 | | |
$ | 2,868 | |
Second quarter | |
| 2,349 | | |
| 810 | | |
| 2,949 | |
Third quarter | |
| | | |
| 523 | | |
| 2,019 | |
Fourth quarter | |
| | | |
| 5,525 | | |
| 2,167 | |
During the six months ended June 30, 2015,
$4.9 million in loans were moved to nonperforming, compared to $8.5 million for all of 2014. Of the $5.5 million total for the
fourth quarter 2014, $4.0 million was related to purchased loans in the fourth quarter. Most of these loans are collateralized
by real estate. NPAs are subject to changes in the economy, both nationally and locally, changes in monetary and fiscal policies,
changes in borrowers’ payment behaviors and changes in conditions affecting various borrowers from Seacoast National. Based
on lower classified assets and impaired loan balances as of June 30, 2015, management believes that prospective inflows to
nonaccrual loans will continue to be reduced.
The Company pursues loan restructurings
in selected cases where it expects to realize better values than may be expected through traditional collection activities. The
Company has worked with retail mortgage customers, when possible, to achieve lower payment structures in an effort to avoid foreclosure.
TDRs have been a part of the Company’s loss mitigation activities and can include rate reductions, payment extensions and
principal deferrals. Company policy requires TDRs that are classified as nonaccrual loans after restructuring remain on nonaccrual
until performance can be verified, which usually requires six months of performance under the restructured loan terms. We are optimistic
that some of these credits will rehabilitate and be upgraded versus migrating to nonperforming or OREO prospectively.
Accruing restructured loans totaled $23.4 million at June 30, 2015 compared to $28.2 million at June 30, 2014,
with $4.2 million of the decline in accruing TDR commercial real estate mortgages. The tables below set forth details related to
nonaccrual and restructured loans.
| |
| | |
Accruing | |
June 30, 2015 | |
Nonaccrual Loans | | |
Restructured | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
NonCurrent | | |
Performing | | |
Total | | |
Loans | |
Construction & land development | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Residential | |
$ | 9 | | |
$ | 0 | | |
$ | 9 | | |
$ | 1,886 | |
Commercial | |
| 1,367 | | |
| 44 | | |
| 1,411 | | |
| 64 | |
Individuals | |
| 0 | | |
| 293 | | |
| 293 | | |
| 374 | |
| |
| 1,376 | | |
| 337 | | |
| 1,713 | | |
| 2,324 | |
Residential real estate mortgages | |
| 1,594 | | |
| 10,635 | | |
| 12,229 | | |
| 13,308 | |
Commercial real estate mortgages | |
| 2,720 | | |
| 2,702 | | |
| 5,422 | | |
| 7,291 | |
Real estate loans | |
| 5,690 | | |
| 13,674 | | |
| 19,364 | | |
| 22,923 | |
Commercial and financial | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 115 | |
Consumer | |
| 17 | | |
| 216 | | |
| 233 | | |
| 403 | |
| |
$ | 5,707 | | |
$ | 13,890 | | |
$ | 19,597 | | |
$ | 23,441 | |
At June 30, 2015 and 2014, total TDRs (performing
and nonperforming) were comprised of the following loans by type of modification:
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Number | | |
Amount | | |
Number | | |
Amount | |
Rate reduction | |
| 98 | | |
$ | 17,379 | | |
| 111 | | |
$ | 21,782 | |
Maturity extended with change in terms | |
| 66 | | |
| 7,914 | | |
| 75 | | |
| 9,887 | |
Forgiveness of principal | |
| 1 | | |
| 1,588 | | |
| 1 | | |
| 1,688 | |
Chapter 7 bankruptcies | |
| 50 | | |
| 2,922 | | |
| 57 | | |
| 3,505 | |
Not elsewhere classified | |
| 15 | | |
| 1,951 | | |
| 10 | | |
| 3,371 | |
| |
| 230 | | |
$ | 31,754 | | |
| 254 | | |
$ | 40,233 | |
During the first and second quarter of
2015, newly identified TDRs totaled $0.9 million, compared to $5.5 million for all of 2014. During 2014, newly identified TDRs
trended lower, with $0.4 million, $4.9 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million recorded in the first, second, third and fourth quarters
of 2014, respectively. Loan modifications are not reported in calendar years after modification if the loans were modified at an
interest rate equal to the yields of new loan originations with comparable risk and the loans are performing based on the terms
of the restructuring agreements. No accruing loans that were restructured within the twelve months preceding June 30, 2015
defaulted during the six months ended June 30, 2015, or for the first six months of 2014. A restructured loan is considered
in default when it becomes 60 days or more past due under the modified terms, has been transferred to nonaccrual status, or has
been transferred to other real estate owned.
At June 30, 2015, portfolio loans
totaling $38.5 million were considered impaired (comprised of nonaccrual, loans 90 days or more past due, and TDRs) and $3.1 million
of the allowance for loan losses was allocated for potential losses on these loans, compared to $49.9 million and $4.7 million,
respectively, at June 30, 2014.
In accordance with regulatory reporting
requirements, loans are placed on nonaccrual following the Retail Classification of Loan interagency guidance. Typically
loans 90 days or more past due are reviewed for impairment, and if deemed impaired, are placed on nonaccrual. Once impaired,
the current fair market value of the collateral is assessed and a specific reserve and/or charge-off taken. Quarterly thereafter,
the loan carrying value is analyzed and any changes are appropriately made as described above.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Total cash and cash equivalents decreased
slightly, by $5.8 million or 5.7%, during the first six months of 2015, compared to December 31, 2014.
SECURITIES
At June 30, 2015, the Company had no trading
securities, $762.1 million in securities available for sale (representing 78.0% of the total portfolio), with the remainder of
$214.8 million in securities held for investment (representing 22.0% of the total portfolio). The Company's total securities portfolio
increased $302.0 million or 44.8% from June 30, 2014, primarily as a result of efforts to invest excess liquidity and short-term
borrowings, and the addition of securities from the merger with BANKshares. Since year-end, the total securities portfolio increased
more modestly, by $27.6 million or 2.9%.
As part of the Company’s interest
rate risk management process, an average duration for the securities portfolio is targeted. In addition, securities are acquired
which return principal monthly that can be reinvested.
The effective duration of the investment
portfolio at June 30, 2015 was 3.3 years, compared to a year ago when the duration was 3.8 years. Management believes the effective
average duration of the portfolio will remain in the 3.0 to 3.5 range over the remainder of 2015, if the yield curve remains unchanged.
At June 30, 2015, available
for sale securities had gross unrealized losses of $7.6 million and gross unrealized gains of $4.3 million compared to
gross unrealized losses of $9.4 million and gross unrealized gains of $4.4 million at December 31, 2014. All of the
securities with unrealized losses are reviewed for other-than-temporary impairment at least quarterly. As a result of these
reviews during the first and second quarters of 2015 and all four quarters of 2014, it was determined that unrealized losses
were not other-than-temporarily impaired, and the Company has the intent and ability to retain these securities until
recovery over the periods presented (see additional discussion under “Critical Accounting Estimates–Fair
Value Measurements”).
Company management considers the overall
quality of the securities portfolio to be high. The Company has no exposure to securities with subprime collateral. The Company
holds no interests in trust preferred securities.
DEPOSITS AND BORROWINGS
The Company’s balance sheet continues
to be primarily core funded. The Company continues to utilize a focused retail and commercial deposit growth strategy that has
successfully generated core deposit relationships and increased services per household.
Total deposits increased $799.6 million
or 44.3% to $2.61 billion at June 30, 2015, compared to one year earlier. The acquisition of BANKshares in the fourth quarter
2014 contributed approximately $516.3 million in total deposits. Since June 30, 2014, interest bearing deposits (interest
bearing demand, savings and money markets deposits) increased $466.3 million or 41.1% to $1.50 billion, noninterest bearing demand
deposits increased $298.6 million or 58.6% to $808.4 million, and CDs increased $34.7 million or 13.4% to $292.9 million.
Total deposits increased $188.6 million
since December 31, 2014, in part due to the Company growing relationships with governmental entities, resulting in an increase
of $41.9 million in new public fund relationships. Also contributing was an increased focus on small business relationships in
the more populated metropolitan areas of Palm Beach County and Central Florida.
Customer repurchase agreements totaled
$157.7 million at June 30, 2015, increasing $16.0 million or 11.3% from June 30, 2014. The repurchase agreements are offered by
Seacoast to select customers who wish to sweep excess balances on a daily basis for investment purposes. Funds from local government
entities comprise a significant amount of the outstanding balance, with safety a major concern for these customers.
At June 30, 2015, other borrowings
were comprised of subordinated debt of $64.6 million related to trust preferred securities issued by trusts organized or acquired
by the Company, and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of $50.0 million. The FHLB advances mature in
2017. For 2015 and 2014, the weighted average cost of our FHLB advances was 3.22%.
The Company has two wholly owned trust
subsidiaries, SBCF Capital Trust I and SBCF Statutory Trust II that were both formed in 2005. In 2007, the Company formed an additional
wholly owned trust subsidiary, SBCF Statutory Trust III. The 2005 trusts each issued $20.0 million (totaling $40.0 million) of
trust preferred securities and the 2007 trust issued an additional $12.0 million in trust preferred securities. As part of the
October 1, 2014 BANKshares acquisition the Company inherited three junior subordinated debentures totaling $5.2 million, $4.1 million,
and $5.2 million, respectively, at June 30, 2015. The acquired junior subordinated debentures (in accordance with ASU 805 Business
Combinations) were recorded at fair value, which collectively is $3.4 million lower than face value and amortizing into interest
expense over their remaining term to maturity. All trust preferred securities are guaranteed by the Company on a junior subordinated
basis.
Under Basel III and Federal Reserve rules,
qualified trust preferred securities and other restricted capital elements can be included as Tier 1 capital, within limitations.
The Company believes that its trust preferred securities qualify under these capital rules. The weighted average interest rate
of our outstanding subordinated debt related to trust preferred securities was 2.31% for the six month period ended June 30, 2015,
compared to 1.87% for all of 2014.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET TRANSACTIONS
In the normal course of business, we may
engage in a variety of financial transactions that, under generally accepted accounting principles, either are not recorded on
the balance sheet or are recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that differ from the full contract or notional amounts. These
transactions involve varying elements of market, credit and liquidity risk.
Lending commitments include unfunded loan
commitments and standby and commercial letters of credit. A large majority of loan commitments and standby letters of credit expire
without being funded, and accordingly, total contractual amounts are not representative of our actual future credit exposure or
liquidity requirements. Loan commitments and letters of credit expose the Company to credit risk in the event that the customer
draws on the commitment and subsequently fails to perform under the terms of the lending agreement.
Loan commitments to customers are made
in the normal course of our commercial and retail lending businesses. For commercial customers, loan commitments generally take
the form of revolving credit arrangements. For retail customers, loan commitments generally are lines of credit secured by residential
property. These instruments are not recorded on the balance sheet until funds are advanced under the commitment. For loan commitments,
the contractual amount of a commitment represents the maximum potential credit risk that could result if the entire commitment
had been funded, the borrower had not performed according to the terms of the contract, and no collateral had been provided. Loan
commitments were $320 million at June 30, 2015 and $159 million at June 30, 2014.
INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY
Fluctuations in interest rates may result
in changes in the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, cash flows and net interest income. This risk is managed
using simulation modeling to calculate the most likely interest rate risk utilizing estimated loan and deposit growth. The objective
is to optimize the Company’s financial position, liquidity, and net interest income while limiting their volatility.
Senior management regularly reviews the
overall interest rate risk position and evaluates strategies to manage the risk. The Company’s most recent Asset and Liability
Management Committee (“ALCO”) model simulation indicates net interest income would increase 9.8% if interest rates
are shocked 200 basis points up over the next 12 months and 5.1% if interest rates are shocked up 100 basis points. This compares
with the Company’s second quarter 2014 model simulation, which indicated net interest income would increase 7.5% if interest
rates are shocked 200 basis points up over the next 12 months and 4.1% if interest rates are shocked up 100 basis points. Recent
regulatory guidance has placed more emphasis on rate shocks.
The Company had a positive gap position
based on contractual and prepayment assumptions for the next 12 months, with a positive cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap
as a percentage of total earning assets of 17.4% at June 30, 2015. This result includes assumptions for core deposit re-pricing
validated for the Company by an independent third party consulting group.
The computations of interest rate risk
do not necessarily include certain actions management may undertake to manage this risk in response to changes in interest rates.
Derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swaps, options, caps, floors, futures and forward contracts may be utilized
as components of the Company’s risk management profile.
LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT
Liquidity risk involves the risk of being
unable to fund assets with the appropriate duration and rate-based liability, as well as the risk of not being able to meet unexpected
cash needs. Liquidity planning and management are necessary to ensure the ability to fund operations cost effectively and to meet
current and future potential obligations such as loan commitments and unexpected deposit outflows.
Funding sources primarily include customer-based
core deposits, collateral-backed borrowings, cash flows from operations, and asset securitizations and sales.
Cash flows from operations are a significant
component of liquidity risk management and we consider both deposit maturities and the scheduled cash flows from loan and investment
maturities and payments. Deposits are also a primary source of liquidity. The stability of this funding source is affected by numerous
factors, including returns available to customers on alternative investments, the quality of customer service levels, safety and
competitive forces. We routinely use securities and loans as collateral for secured borrowings. In the event of severe market disruptions,
we have access to secured borrowings through the FHLB and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta under its borrower-in-custody program.
Contractual maturities for assets and liabilities
are reviewed to meet current and expected future liquidity requirements. Sources of liquidity, both anticipated and unanticipated,
are maintained through a portfolio of high quality marketable assets, such as residential mortgage loans, securities held for sale
and interest bearing deposits. The Company is also able to provide short term financing of its activities by selling, under an
agreement to repurchase, United States Treasury and Government agency securities not pledged to secure public deposits or trust
funds. At June 30, 2015, Seacoast National had available unsecured lines of $40 million and lines of credit under current
lendable collateral value, which are subject to change, of $814 million. Seacoast National had $614 million of United States Treasury
and Government agency securities, mortgage backed securities and collateral lending obligations not pledged and available for use
under repurchase agreements, and had an additional $248 million in residential and commercial real estate loans available as collateral.
In comparison, at June 30, 2014, the Company had available unsecured lines of $45 million and lines of credit of $623 million,
and had $390 million of Treasury and Government agency securities, mortgage backed securities and collateral lending obligations
not pledged and available for use under repurchase agreements, as well as an additional $163 million in residential and commercial
real estate loans available as collateral.
Liquidity, as measured in the form of cash
and cash equivalents (including interest bearing deposits), totaled $94.7 million on a consolidated basis at June 30, 2015 as compared
to $154.0 million at June 30, 2014. The composition of cash and cash equivalents has changed from a year ago. Over the past twelve
months, cash and due from banks increased $46.7 million to $86.9 million and interest bearing deposits decreased to $7.8 million
from $113.9 million. The interest bearing deposits are maintained in Seacoast’s account at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
Cash and cash equivalents vary with seasonal deposit movements and are generally higher in the winter than in the summer, and vary
with the level of principal repayments and investment activity occurring in Seacoast National’s securities and loan portfolios.
During 2014, our intent was to reinvest excess liquidity into the loan and securities portfolios.
The Company does not rely on and is not
dependent on off-balance sheet financing or wholesale funding.
The Company is a legal entity separate
and distinct from Seacoast National and its other subsidiaries. Various legal limitations, including Section 23A and 23B of
the Federal Reserve Act and Federal Reserve Regulation W, restrict Seacoast National from lending or otherwise supplying funds
to the Company or its non-bank subsidiaries. The Company has traditionally relied upon dividends from Seacoast National and securities
offerings to provide funds to pay the Company’s expenses, to service the Company’s debt and to pay dividends upon Company
common stock and preferred stock. At June 30, 2015, the Company had cash and cash equivalents at the parent of approximately
$37.5 million, compared to $38.3 million at December 31, 2014.
EFFECTS OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES
The condensed consolidated financial statements
and related financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which require the measurement of financial
position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of
money, over time, due to inflation.
Unlike most industrial companies, virtually
all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant
impact on a financial institution’s performance than the general level of inflation. However, inflation affects financial
institutions by increasing their cost of goods and services purchased, as well as the cost of salaries and benefits, occupancy
expense, and similar items. Inflation and related increases in interest rates generally decrease the market value of investments
and loans held and may adversely affect liquidity, earnings, and shareholders’ equity. Mortgage originations and re-financings
tend to slow as interest rates increase, and higher interest rates likely will reduce the Company’s earnings from such activities
and the income from the sale of residential mortgage loans in the secondary market.
SPECIAL CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Various of the statements made herein under
the captions “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, “Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk”, “Risk Factors” and elsewhere, are “forward-looking statements”
within the meaning and protections of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
Forward-looking statements include statements
with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions, and involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond our control, and which may cause the actual results, performance
or achievements of Seacoast to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements. You should not expect us to update any forward-looking statements.
All statements other than statements of
historical fact are statements that could be forward-looking statements. You can identify these forward-looking statements through
our use of words such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “should,”
“support”, “indicate,” “would,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “expect,”
“estimate,” “continue,” “further”, “point to,” “project,” “could,”
“intend” or other similar words and expressions of the future. These forward-looking statements may not be realized
due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation:
| • | the effects of future economic and market conditions, including seasonality; |
| • | governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative, tax and regulatory changes; |
| • | legislative and regulatory changes, including changes in banking, securities and tax laws and regulations
and their application by our regulators, and changes in the scope and cost of FDIC insurance and other coverage; |
| • | changes in accounting policies, rules and practices; |
| • | the risks of changes in interest rates on the level and composition of deposits, loan demand, liquidity
and the values of loan collateral, securities, and interest sensitive assets and liabilities; interest rate risks, sensitivities
and the shape of the yield curve; |
| • | the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer
finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other
financial institutions operating in our market areas and elsewhere, including institutions operating regionally, nationally and
internationally, together with such competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone, computer and the Internet; |
| • | the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for possible loan losses; |
| • | the risks of mergers and acquisitions, include, without limitation, unexpected transaction costs,
including the costs of integrating operations; the risks that the businesses will not be integrated successfully or that such integration
may be more difficult, time-consuming or costly than expected; |
| • | the potential failure to fully or timely realize expected revenues and revenue synergies, including
as the result of revenues following the merger being lower than expected; |
| • | the risk of deposit and customer attrition; any changes in deposit mix; unexpected operating and
other costs, which may differ or change from expectations; |
| • | the risks of customer and employee loss and business disruption, including, without limitation,
as the result of difficulties in maintaining relationships with employees; increased competitive pressures and solicitations of
customers by competitors; as well as the difficulties and risks inherent with entering new markets; and |
| • | other risks and uncertainties described herein and in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2014 and otherwise in our Securities and Exchange Commission, or “SEC”, reports and filings. |
All written or oral forward-looking statements
attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary notice. We have no obligation and do not undertake
to update, revise or correct any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report, or after the respective dates
on which such statements otherwise are made.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
See Management’s discussion and analysis
“Interest Rate Sensitivity”.
Market risk refers to potential losses
arising from changes in interest rates, and other relevant market rates or prices.
Interest rate risk, defined as the exposure
of net interest income and Economic Value of Equity, or “EVE,” to adverse movements in interest rates, is the Company’s
primary market risk, and mainly arises from the structure of the balance sheet (non-trading activities). The Company is also exposed
to market risk in its investing activities. The Company’s Asset/Liability Committee, or “ALCO,” meets regularly
and is responsible for reviewing the interest rate sensitivity position of the Company and establishing policies to monitor and
limit exposure to interest rate risk. The policies established by the ALCO are reviewed and approved by the Company’s Board
of Directors. The primary goal of interest rate risk management is to control exposure to interest rate risk, within policy limits
approved by the Board. These limits reflect the Company’s tolerance for interest rate risk over short-term and long-term
horizons.
The Company also performs valuation analyses,
which are used for evaluating levels of risk present in the balance sheet that might not be taken into account in the net interest
income simulation analyses. Whereas net interest income simulation highlights exposures over a relatively short time horizon, valuation
analysis incorporates all cash flows over the estimated remaining life of all balance sheet positions. The valuation of the balance
sheet, at a point in time, is defined as the discounted present value of asset cash flows minus the discounted value of liability
cash flows, the net result of which is the EVE. The sensitivity of EVE to changes in the level of interest rates is a measure of
the longer-term re-pricing risks and options risks embedded in the balance sheet. In contrast to the net interest income simulation,
which assumes interest rates will change over a period of time, EVE uses instantaneous changes in rates.
EVE values only the current balance sheet,
and does not incorporate the growth assumptions that are used in the net interest income simulation model. As with the net interest
income simulation model, assumptions about the timing and variability of balance sheet cash flows are critical in the EVE analysis.
Particularly important are the assumptions driving prepayments and the expected changes in balances and pricing of the indeterminate
life deposit portfolios. Core deposits are a more significant funding source for the Company, making the lives attached to core
deposits more important to the accuracy of our modeling of EVE. The Company periodically reassesses its assumptions regarding the
indeterminate lives of core deposits utilizing an independent third party resource to assist. With lower interest rates over a
prolonged period, the average lives of core deposits have trended higher and favorably impacted model estimates of EVE for higher
rates. Based on our second quarter 2015 modeling, an instantaneous 100 basis point increase in rates is estimated to increase the
EVE 15.3% versus the EVE in a stable rate environment, while a 200 basis point increase in rates is estimated to increase the EVE
28.1%.
While an instantaneous and severe shift
in interest rates is used in this analysis to provide an estimate of exposure under an extremely adverse scenario, a gradual shift
in interest rates would have a much more modest impact. Since EVE measures the discounted present value of cash flows over the
estimated lives of instruments, the change in EVE does not directly correlate to the degree that earnings would be impacted over
a shorter time horizon, i.e., the next fiscal year. Further, EVE does not take into account factors such as future balance sheet
growth, changes in product mix, change in yield curve relationships, and changing product spreads that could mitigate the adverse
impact of changes in interest rates.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company’s management, with the
participation of its chief executive officer and chief financial officer has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2015
and concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no changes to the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred since the beginning of the Company’s second quarter of 2015 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
While the Company believes that its existing
disclosure controls and procedures have been effective to accomplish these objectives, the Company intends to continue to examine,
refine and formalize its disclosure controls and procedures and to monitor ongoing developments in this area.
Part II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject,
in the ordinary course, to litigation incident to the business in which they are engaged. Management presently believes that none
of the legal proceedings to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is the subject
are materially likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, or operating results
or cash flows, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of any such claim or litigation.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set
forth in this report, you should consider the factors discussed in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and prospective
results. The risks described in this report, in our Form 10-K or our other SEC filings are not the only risks facing our Company.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition or future results. There have been no material changes with respect to the risk factors
disclosed in our Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
Issuer purchases of equity securities during
the first six months of 2015, entirely related to equity incentive plan activity, were as follows:
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Maximum | |
| |
Total | | |
| | |
Total Number of | | |
Number of | |
| |
Number of | | |
| | |
Shares Purchased | | |
Shares that May | |
| |
Shares | | |
Average Price | | |
as part of Public | | |
yet be Purchased | |
Period | |
Purchased | | |
Paid Per Share | | |
Announced Plan* | | |
Under the Plan | |
1/1/15 to 1/31/15 | |
| 0 | | |
$ | 0.00 | | |
| 179,828 | | |
| 235,172 | |
2/1/15 to 2/28/15 | |
| 2,880 | | |
| 12.66 | | |
| 182,708 | | |
| 232,292 | |
3/1/15 to 3/31/15 | |
| 0 | | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 182,708 | | |
| 232,292 | |
Total - 1st Quarter | |
| 2,880 | | |
| 12.66 | | |
| 182,708 | | |
| 232,292 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
4/1/15 to 4/30/15 | |
| 740 | | |
| 14.13 | | |
| 183,448 | | |
| 231,552 | |
5/1/15 to 5/31/15 | |
| 0 | | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 183,448 | | |
| 231,552 | |
6/1/15 to 6/30/15 | |
| 0 | | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 183,448 | | |
| 231,552 | |
Total - 2nd Quarter | |
| 740 | | |
| 14.13 | | |
| 183,448 | | |
| 231,552 | |
*The plan to purchase equity securities
totaling 165,000 was approved on September 18, 2001, with no expiration date. An additional 250,000 shares was added to the plan
and approved on May 20, 2014.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None
Item 5. Other Information
During the period covered by this report,
there was no information required to be disclosed by us in a Current Report on Form 8-K that was not so reported, nor were there
any material changes to the procedures by which our security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit 3.1.1 |
|
Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q, filed May 10, 2006). |
Exhibit 3.1.2 |
|
Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K, filed December 23, 2008). |
Exhibit 3.1.3 |
|
Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.4 to the Company's Form S-1, filed June 22, 2009). |
Exhibit 3.1.4 |
|
Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K, filed July 20, 2009). |
Exhibit 3.1.5 |
|
Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K, filed December 3, 2009). |
Exhibit 3.1.6 |
|
Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K/A, filed July 14, 2010). |
Exhibit 3.1.7 |
|
Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K, filed June 25, 2010). |
Exhibit 3.1.8 |
|
Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K, filed June 1, 2011). |
Exhibit 3.1.9 |
|
Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Form 8-K, filed December 13, 2013). |
Exhibit 3.2 |
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Form 8-K, filed December 21, 2007). |
Exhibit 31.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Exhibit 31.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Exhibit 32.1 |
|
Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Exhibit 32.2 |
|
Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Exhibit 101 |
|
The following materials from Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA |
|
|
August 10, 2015 |
/s/ Dennis S. Hudson, III |
|
DENNIS S. HUDSON, III |
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
August 10, 2015 |
/s/ Stephen A. Fowle |
|
STEPHEN A. FOWLE |
|
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 31.1
Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
I, Dennis S. Hudson, III, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida; |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| 4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
| b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s second fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting; and |
| 5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and |
| b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 10, 2015 |
|
|
|
/s/
Dennis S. Hudson, III |
|
|
|
|
Dennis S. Hudson, III |
|
|
|
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 31.2
Certification Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
I, Stephen A. Fowle, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida; |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| 4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
| b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s second fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting; and |
| 5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and |
| b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 10, 2015 |
|
|
|
/s/
Stephen A. Fowle |
|
|
|
|
Stephen A. Fowle |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.1
STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (“Company”) for the period ended June
30, 2015 (“Report”), I, Dennis S. Hudson, III , Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and |
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 10, 2015 |
|
|
|
/s/
Dennis S. Hudson , III |
|
|
|
|
Dennis S. Hudson, III |
|
|
|
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.2
STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (“Company”) for the period ended June
30, 2015 (“Report”), I, Stephen A. Fowle, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and |
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 10, 2015 |
|
|
|
/s/
Stephen A. Fowle |
|
|
|
|
Stephen A. Fowle |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Seacoast Banking Corpora... (NASDAQ:SBCF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Feb 2024 to Mar 2024
Seacoast Banking Corpora... (NASDAQ:SBCF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2023 to Mar 2024