UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________
FORM SD
Specialized Disclosure Report
______________
|
|
NVIDIA CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
|
| | |
Delaware | 0-23985 | 94-3177549 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
| |
2701 San Tomas Expressway, Santa Clara, CA (Address of principal executive offices) | 95050 (Zip Code)
|
David M. Shannon, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary
(408) 486-2000
(Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report)
Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies:
| |
ý | Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. |
Section 1 – Conflict Minerals Disclosure
Item 1.01 Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report
Conflict Minerals Disclosure
The Conflict Minerals Report of NVIDIA Corporation, a Delaware corporation, for the calendar year ended December 31, 2014 is filed herewith as Exhibit 1.01 and is available at: investor.nvidia.com/sec.cfm.
Section 2 – Exhibits
Item 2.01 Exhibits
Exhibit 1.01 Conflict Minerals Report as required by Items 1.01 and 1.02 of this Form
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.
NVIDIA Corporation
By: /s/ David M. Shannon___________________________ Date: May 27, 2015
David M. Shannon
Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer
and Secretary
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description |
1.01 | | Conflict Minerals Report for the calendar year ended December 31, 2014. |
Exhibit 1.01
Conflict Minerals Report
of NVIDIA Corporation
for the Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2014
OUR COMPANY
NVIDIA is dedicated to advancing visual computing, enabling individuals to interact with digital ideas, data and entertainment with an ease and efficiency unmatched by any other communication medium.
Our business model has three elements: creating NVIDIA-branded products and services, offering our processors to original equipment manufacturers, and licensing our intellectual property. NVIDIA-branded products and services are visual computing platforms that address four large markets: Gaming, Enterprise, High Performance Computing and Cloud, and Automotive.
We do not directly manufacture the semiconductor wafers or printed circuit boards used in our products, nor do we manufacture the company’s branded devices. Instead, we utilize what is known as a fabless manufacturing strategy for all of our semiconductor product-line operating segments, whereby we employ world-class suppliers for all phases of the manufacturing process, including wafer fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging. Our suppliers are also responsible for procurement of most of the raw materials used in the production of our products. We also contract with manufacturers to build, test, and distribute our company-branded devices.
Because conflict minerals were necessary to the functionality of the products we contracted to manufacture between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014, or the Reporting Period, we conducted a reasonable country of origin inquiry, or RCOI, regarding those conflict minerals. “Conflict minerals” are defined in Item 1.01(d)(3) of the Specialized Disclosure Report on Form SD, or the Form SD, as columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, gold, wolframite, or their derivatives, which are limited to tantalum, tin, and tungsten, or collectively, 3TG.
REASONABLE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INQUIRY (RCOI)
To conduct our RCOI, we identified our suppliers and component manufacturers of products manufactured during the Reporting Period, and requested that they each provide NVIDIA with a list of the smelters and refiners associated with the conflict minerals in their products and components via the conflict minerals reporting template, or the CMRT, of the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative, or CFSI. Our goal was to determine whether any 3TG in our products or components were from recycled or scrap sources, or originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country, which we refer to collectively as the Covered Countries. Approximately 96% of our suppliers and component manufacturers responded with the requested information.
While the majority of our suppliers reported unknown countries of origin for the 3TG contained in our products and components, we also compared their responses with the RCOI data provided by the Conflict-Free Smelter Program, or CFSP, of the CFSI. Our RCOI revealed that 20 smelters and refiners in our supply chain were identified by the CFSI as sourcing from the Covered Countries, and that all 20 have undergone an independent third-party audit and have been designated as “conflict-free” by the CFSP. Therefore, we believe that a portion of the conflict minerals contained in such products originated in the Covered Countries.
NVIDIA’s supply chain is complex and there are multiple tiers between NVIDIA and the actual mining of the conflict minerals. Because we utilize a fabless manufacturing strategy, we must rely on our suppliers and component manufacturers, including sub-tier suppliers, to provide us with information on the origin of the conflict minerals contained in our products and product components. We are filing this Conflict Minerals Report pursuant to Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Rule 13p-1, because we are unable to determine, as of the date of the filing of the Form SD to which this Conflict Minerals Report is an exhibit, the origin of all conflict minerals that were contained in the products we contracted to manufacture during the Reporting Period.
DUE DILIGENCE PROGRAM DESIGN
Our conflict minerals due diligence program is designed to conform in all material respects with the framework recommended by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, or the OECD Guidance, as it relates to our supply chain position as a “downstream” purchaser. Summarized below are the components of our program as they relate to the five-step framework set forth in the OECD Guidance:
OECD Guidance Step 1: Establish strong company management systems
| |
• | Adopted and publicly communicated a company-wide Corporate Responsibility Directive, in which we declare that we abide by the Code of Conduct of the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition, or EICC, including the standard regarding responsible sourcing of conflict minerals, which can be found on our website at http://www.nvidia.com/content/includes/gcr/pdf/nvidia-corporate-responsibility-directive-2014.pdf |
| |
• | As a member of the EICC, required that our suppliers and contract manufacturers acknowledge and implement the EICC’s Code of Conduct, which includes an obligation to conduct due diligence regarding conflict minerals |
| |
• | Adopted and publicly communicated a conflict minerals company statement endorsed by our Executive Vice President, Operations, which is posted on our website at http://www.nvidia.com/content/includes/gcr/pdf/nvidia-dodd-frank-conflict-minerals-position-statement.pdf |
| |
• | Assembled internal conflict minerals team, with representation by NVIDIA’s Operations (covering Silicon Products and System-Level Products groups), Legal, Sales and Corporate Responsibility departments |
| |
• | Established a system of control and transparency over our conflict minerals supply chain by engaging first-tier and second-tier suppliers and requesting relevant information through the use of a third-party supplier management vendor which utilized due diligence tools created by the CFSI, including the CMRT |
| |
• | Provided updates on our conflict minerals due diligence progress and status on at least a quarterly basis to certain members of NVIDIA’s senior management, including our Executive Vice President, Operations; Senior Vice President, Systems and Application Engineering; and Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer |
| |
• | Maintained a company grievance mechanism available internally to allow reporting about any matter of concern, including those related to conflict minerals |
OECD Guidance Step 2: Identify and assess risk in the supply chain
| |
• | Identified relevant suppliers that supplied products containing 3TG by reference to bills of materials |
| |
• | Requested such suppliers to provide information regarding smelters or refiners in our supply chain by using the CMRT |
| |
• | Reviewed supplier responses for completeness and accuracy |
| |
• | Compared information in supplier responses with the list of 3TG processing facilities that received a “conflict-free” designation, produced by the CFSP |
| |
• | Contacted non-responsive suppliers, requesting their responses |
| |
• | Provided suppliers with feedback on responses containing errors, inconsistencies or incomplete information |
OECD Guidance Step 3: Design and implement a strategy to respond to risk
| |
• | Held regular conflict minerals team meetings to review, among other things, our conflict minerals program, any potential or actual risks identified during due diligence, and the status of supplier responses |
| |
• | Reported progress on a quarterly basis to our Executive Vice President, Operations |
| |
• | Identified main risks in our supply chain |
| |
• | Contacted certain smelter and refiner facilities that have not received a “conflict-free” designation from an independent third-party audit program to encourage their participation |
| |
• | Implemented a risk mitigation response plan to monitor and track unresponsive suppliers and/or incomplete or inaccurate supply chain information |
| |
• | Requested that certain suppliers remove specific smelters or refiners from their supply chain that we deemed to be high-risk |
OECD Guidance Step 4: Independent third-party audit of smelter/refiner’s due diligence practices
| |
• | Relied on the CFSP to coordinate third-party audits of smelters and refiners to validate the sourcing practices of such facilities in our supply chain |
| |
• | Provided indirect financial support for such third-party audits through our continued membership in the EICC and CFSI |
| |
• | Participated in EICC work groups, including smelter engagement and outreach |
OECD Guidance Step 5: Report annually on supply chain due diligence
| |
• | Adopted and publicly communicated a conflict minerals company statement endorsed by our Executive Vice President, Operations, which is posted on our website at http://www.nvidia.com/content/includes/gcr/pdf/nvidia-dodd-frank-conflict-minerals-position-statement.pdf |
| |
• | Published conflict minerals information in our annual corporate responsibility report, which is posted on our website at http://www.nvidia.com/gcr |
| |
• | Filed our Form SD for the reporting period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014, including this Conflict Minerals Report, with the Securities Exchange Commission and made it available on the Investor Relations pages of our Web site at http://investor.nvidia.com/sec.cfm |
| |
• | Reported supply chain smelter information in this Conflict Minerals Report |
DESCRIPTION OF DUE DILIGENCE MEASURES PERFORMED
We designed and adopted a risk management plan that includes due diligence reviews of suppliers, smelters and refiners which may be sourcing or processing conflict minerals from the Covered Countries. We requested supply chain information from our suppliers, and performed additional follow up with those suppliers whose CMRTs contained incomplete or potentially inaccurate information. After reviewing the names provided by our suppliers and component manufacturers against the CFSI lists of verified smelters and refiners, we consulted with our CFSI colleagues to distinguish those that were actual smelters and refiners from other participants in the upstream supply chain, such as brokers and traders. We provided our list of smelters and refiners for inclusion in the CFSP, which utilized an independent third party to conduct audits, according to the standards of the OECD Guidance, of willing smelters and refiners to determine the source and origin of their ore, as well as whether they were conflict-free.
Based on the due diligence described above, we determined that the supply chain for our products contracted to be manufactured during the Reporting Period sourced conflict minerals from up to 377 processing facilities worldwide, of which: 256 have been recognized by the CFSP as being legitimate smelters or refiners; 152 have been validated by the CFSP as being conflict-free, including some conflict-free tantalum, tin and tungsten that originated from the Covered Countries; and another approximately 38 are in the process of being audited by an independent third party. The remaining facilities are split between those smelters and refiners which have not previously consented to be audited and those facilities not currently recognized by the EICC as a smelter or refiner. A list of CFSP-validated and compliant smelters and refiners contained in our supply chain is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
We requested mine or location of origin information from each of our suppliers for the purposes of determining the source and chain of custody of the necessary 3TG in our supply chain. While some of our suppliers reported the names or countries of sourcing mines, most were unable to obtain mine or location of origin information for their necessary 3TG.
STEPS TAKEN OR TO BE TAKEN TO MITIGATE RISK AND IMPROVE DUE DILIGENCE
NVIDIA has been a member of the EICC, a coalition of leading electronics companies working together to improve social, ethical, and environmental responsibility in the global supply chain, since 2007. Beginning in 2012, we have also been an active participant in the EICC-Global e-Sustainability Initiative, or GeSI, Extractives Work Group, or the Extractives Work Group, a multi-sector partnership focused on addressing conflict minerals issues and challenges. In 2013, the EICC and GeSI announced the launch of the CFSI to replace the Extractives Work Group. Additionally, to support initiatives targeted at improving the traceability of conflict minerals in the Great Lakes Region of Central Africa, which includes the Democratic Republic of the Congo, we joined the Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade in 2013.
We are also part of 2 sub-work groups of the CFSI. Since 2013, we have been a participant in the Due Diligence Data Collection team, which develops updates to the CMRT. In 2015, we joined the Smelter Engagement Team to perform outreach to smelters, encouraging recognized smelters and refiners to participate in the CFSP. Since NVIDIA’s involvement with the Smelter Engagement Team, one smelter has agreed to meet with a representative of sub-work group to obtain more information about the CFSP and to gain a better understanding of the relevant conflict minerals reporting requirements. Apart from our participation with the Smelter Engagement Team, we have also contacted approximately 30 smelters and refiners directly to encourage them to be audited through to CFSP.
In 2014, we also commenced the use of third-party supplier management software to assist the company with:
| |
• | Obtaining the proper and accurate contact information of the relevant supplier representatives |
| |
• | Distribution of the CMRT to our suppliers |
| |
• | Collection and validation of our suppliers’ responses |
| |
• | Follow up with non-responsive suppliers or those providing inaccurate or incomplete CMRTs |
| |
• | Aggregation of supplier data for analysis |
After undertaking the actions described above, we experienced an increase to our supplier response rate from approximately 80% in calendar year 2013 to approximately 96% in calendar year 2014.
INHERENT LIMITATIONS ON DUE DILIGENCE MEASURES
Because of our fabless manufacturing strategy and our contract manufacturing process for our branded devices, our due diligence measures can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance regarding the source and chain of custody of the necessary conflict minerals in the products we contract to have manufactured. Given our place in the supply chain, we have no direct relationships with smelters, refiners, and therefore possess no independent means of determining the source and origin of conflict mineral ores processed by smelters or refiners. Our due diligence processes are based on the necessity of seeking data from our suppliers and component manufacturers and those suppliers seeking similar information within their supply chains to identify the original sources of the necessary conflict minerals. We also rely, to a large extent, on information collected and provided by independent third-party audit programs. Such sources of information may yield inaccurate or incomplete information and may be subject to fraud.
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
During the Reporting Period, we identified the following products that may contain necessary conflict minerals that we manufactured or contracted to manufacture:
| |
• | Graphic Processing Units, including: |
| |
• | NVIDIA SHIELDTM gaming portables, controllers and tablets |
| |
• | NVIDIA 3D vision glasses |
The description of our due diligence process above to determine the location of origin of the conflict minerals in NVIDIA’s products is hereby incorporated by reference into this section of our Conflict Minerals Report.
EXHIBIT A
CFSP-recognized smelters and refiners as of May 2015
|
| | |
Metal | Name of Smelter or Refiner | Smelter or Refiner Location |
Gold | Advanced Chemical Company | United States |
Gold | Aida Chemical Industries Co Ltd | Japan |
Gold | Allgemeine Gold-und Silberscheideanstalt A.G. | Germany |
Gold | Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex (AMMC) | Uzbekistan |
Gold | AngloGold Ashanti Córrego do Sítio Mineração | Brazil |
Gold | Argor-Heraeus SA | Switzerland |
Gold | Asahi Pretec Corporation | Japan |
Gold | Asaka Riken Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Atasay Kuyumculuk Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. | Turkey |
Gold | Aurubis AG | Germany |
Gold | Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (Central Bank of the Philippines) | Philippines |
Gold | Bauer Walser AG | Germany |
Gold | Boliden AB | Sweden |
Gold | C. Hafner GmbH + Co. KG | Germany |
Gold | Caridad | Mexico |
Gold | CCR Refinery - Glencore Canada Corporation | Canada |
Gold | Cendres + Métaux SA | Switzerland |
Gold | Chimet S.p.A. | Italy |
Gold | Chugai Mining | Japan |
Gold | Daejin Indus Co., Ltd. | Republic of Korea |
Gold | Daye Non-Ferrous Metals Mining Ltd. | China |
Gold | Do Sung Corporation | Republic of Korea |
Gold | Doduco | Germany |
Gold | Dowa | Japan |
Gold | Eco-System Recycling Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Faggi Enrico S.p.A. | Italy |
Gold | FSE Novosibirsk Refinery | Russian Federation |
Gold | Gansu Seemine Material Hi-Tech Co., Ltd. | China |
Gold | Geib Refining Corporation | United States |
Gold | Guangdong Jinding Gold Limited | China |
Gold | Hangzhou Fuchunjiang Smelting Co., Ltd. | China |
Gold | Heimerle + Meule GmbH | Germany |
Gold | Heraeus Ltd. Hong Kong | China |
Gold | Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KG | Germany |
Gold | Hunan Chenzhou Mining Industry Co. Ltd. | China |
Gold | Hwasung CJ Co., Ltd. | Republic of Korea |
Gold | Inner Mongolia Qiankun Gold and Silver Refinery Share Company Limited | China |
Gold | Ishifuku Metal Industry Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Istanbul Gold Refinery | Turkey |
Gold | Japan Mint | Japan |
|
| | |
Gold | Jiangxi Copper Company Limited | China |
Gold | Johnson Matthey Inc. | United States |
Gold | Johnson Matthey Limited | Canada |
Gold | JSC Ekaterinburg Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Plant | Russian Federation |
Gold | JSC Uralelectromed | Russian Federation |
Gold | JX Nippon Mining & Metals Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Kazzinc | Kazakhstan |
Gold | Kennecott Utah Copper LLC | United States |
Gold | Kojima Chemicals Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Korea Metal Co., Ltd. | Republic of Korea |
Gold | Kyrgyzaltyn JSC | Kyrgyzstan |
Gold | L' azurde Company For Jewelry | Saudi Arabia |
Gold | Lingbao Gold Company Limited | China |
Gold | Lingbao Jinyuan Tonghui Refinery Co., Ltd. | China |
Gold | LS-NIKKO Copper Inc. | Republic of Korea |
Gold | Luoyang Zijin Yinhui Gold Smelting | China |
Gold | Materion | United States |
Gold | Matsuda Sangyo Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Metalor Technologies (Hong Kong) Ltd. | China |
Gold | Metalor Technologies (Singapore) Pte., Ltd. | Singapore |
Gold | Metalor Technologies (Suzhou) Ltd. | China |
Gold | Metalor Technologies SA | Switzerland |
Gold | Metalor USA Refining Corporation | United States |
Gold | Met-Mex Penoles, S.A. | Mexico |
Gold | Mitsubishi Materials Corporation | Japan |
Gold | Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Moscow Special Alloys Processing Plant | Russian Federation |
Gold | Nadir Metal Rafineri San. Ve Tic. A.S. | Turkey |
Gold | Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Combinat | Uzbekistan |
Gold | Nihon Material Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Ohio Precious Metals, LLC | United States |
Gold | Ohura Precious Metal Industry Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | OJSC "The Gulidov Krasnoyarsk Non-Ferrous Metals Plant" (OJSC Krastvetmet) | Russian Federation |
Gold | OJSC Kolyma Refinery | Russian Federation |
Gold | PAMP SA | Switzerland |
Gold | Penglai Penggang Gold Industry Co., Ltd. | China |
Gold | Perth Mint | Australia |
Gold | Prioksky Plant of Non-Ferrous Metals | Russian Federation |
Gold | PT Aneka Tambang (Persero) Tbk | Indonesia |
Gold | PX Précinox SA | Switzerland |
Gold | Rand Refinery (Pty) Ltd. | South Africa |
Gold | Republic Metals Corporation | United States |
Gold | Royal Canadian Mint | Canada |
Gold | Sabin Metal Corp. | United States |
Gold | Samduck Precious Metals | Republic of Korea |
Gold | SAMWON Metals Corp. | Republic of Korea |
|
| | |
Gold | Schone Edelmetaal | Netherlands |
Gold | SEMPSA Joyería Platería SA | Spain |
Gold | Shandong Zhaojin Gold & Silver Refinery Co., Ltd. | China |
Gold | So Accurate Group, Inc. | United States |
Gold | SOE Shyolkovsky Factory of Secondary Precious Metals | Russian Federation |
Gold | Solar Applied Materials Technology Corp. | Taiwan |
Gold | Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K.K. | Japan |
Gold | The Great Wall Gold and Silver Refinery of China | China |
Gold | The Refinery of Shandong Gold Mining Co., Ltd. | China |
Gold | Tokuriki Honten Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Tongling Nonferrous Metals Group Co., Ltd. | China |
Gold | Torecom | Republic of Korea |
Gold | Umicore Brasil Ltda. | Brazil |
Gold | Umicore Precious Metals Thailand | Thailand |
Gold | Umicore SA Business Unit Precious Metals Refining | Belgium |
Gold | United Precious Metal Refining, Inc. | United States |
Gold | Valcambi SA | Switzerland |
Gold | Yamamoto Precious Metal Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Yokohama Metal Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Yunnan Copper Industry Co., Ltd. | China |
Gold | Zhongyuan Gold Smelter of Zhongjin Gold Corporation | China |
Gold | Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd. Gold Refinery | China |
Tantalum | Changsha South Tantalum Niobium Co., Ltd. | China |
Tantalum | Conghua Tantalum and Niobium Smeltry | China |
Tantalum | Duoluoshan | China |
Tantalum | Exotech Inc | United States |
Tantalum | F & X | China |
Tantalum | Global Advanced Metals Aizu | Japan |
Tantalum | Global Advanced Metals Boyertown | United States |
Tantalum | Guangdong Zhiyuan New Material Co., Ltd. | China |
Tantalum | Guizhou Zhenhua Xinyun Technology Ltd., Kaili branch | China |
Tantalum | H.C. Starck Co., Ltd. | Thailand |
Tantalum | H.C. Starck GmbH Goslar | Germany |
Tantalum | H.C. Starck GmbH Laufenburg | Germany |
Tantalum | H.C. Starck Hermsdorf GmbH | Germany |
Tantalum | H.C. Starck Inc. | United States |
Tantalum | H.C. Starck Ltd. | Japan |
Tantalum | H.C. Starck Smelting GmbH & Co.KG | Germany |
Tantalum | Hengyang King Xing Lifeng New Materials Co., Ltd. | China |
Tantalum | Hi-Temp | United States |
Tantalum | Jiangxi Dinghai Tantalum & Niobium Co., Ltd. | China |
Tantalum | JiuJiang JinXin Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd. | China |
Tantalum | Jiujiang Tambre Co., Ltd. | China |
Tantalum | KEMET Blue Metals | Mexico |
Tantalum | KEMET Blue Powder | United States |
|
| | |
Tantalum | King-Tan Tantalum Industry Ltd. | China |
Tantalum | LSM Brasil S.A. | Brazil |
Tantalum | Metallurgical Products India Pvt., Ltd. | India |
Tantalum | Mineração Taboca S.A. | Brazil |
Tantalum | Mitsui Mining & Smelting | Japan |
Tantalum | Molycorp Silmet A.S. | Estonia |
Tantalum | Ningxia Orient Tantalum Industry Co., Ltd. | China |
Tantalum | Plansee SE Liezen | Austria |
Tantalum | Plansee SE Reutte | Austria |
Tantalum | QuantumClean | United States |
Tantalum | RFH | China |
Tantalum | Solikamsk Metal Works | Russian Federation |
Tantalum | Taki Chemicals | Japan |
Tantalum | Telex Metals | United States |
Tantalum | Ulba | Kazakhstan |
Tantalum | Yichun Jin Yang Rare Metal Co., Ltd. | China |
Tantalum | Zhuzhou Cemented Carbide | China |
Tin | Alpha Metals | United States |
Tin | China Rare Metal Material Co., Ltd. | China |
Tin | China Tin Group Co., Ltd. | China |
Tin | CNMC (Guangxi) PGMA Co., Ltd. | China |
Tin | Cooper Santa | Brazil |
Tin | Cooperativa Metalurgica de Rondônia Ltda. | Brazil |
Tin | CV Gita Pesona | Indonesia |
Tin | CV Justindo | Indonesia |
Tin | CV Nurjanah | Indonesia |
Tin | CV Serumpun Sebalai | Indonesia |
Tin | CV United Smelting | Indonesia |
Tin | Dowa | Japan |
Tin | EM Vinto | Bolivia |
Tin | Estanho de Rondônia S.A. | Brazil |
Tin | Feinhütte Halsbrücke GmbH | Germany |
Tin | Fenix Metals | Poland |
Tin | Gejiu Kai Meng Industry and Trade LLC | China |
Tin | Gejiu Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Co., Ltd. | China |
Tin | Gejiu Zili Mining And Metallurgy Co., Ltd. | China |
Tin | Huichang Jinshunda Tin Co., Ltd. | China |
Tin | Jiangxi Ketai Advanced Material Co., Ltd. | China |
Tin | Linwu Xianggui Smelter Co | China |
Tin | Magnu's Minerais Metais e Ligas Ltda. | Brazil |
Tin | Malaysia Smelting Corporation (MSC) | Malaysia |
Tin | Melt Metais e Ligas S/A | Brazil |
Tin | Metallic Resources, Inc. | United States |
Tin | Metallo-Chimique N.V. | Belgium |
Tin | Mineração Taboca S.A. | Brazil |
Tin | Minsur | Peru |
|
| | |
Tin | Mitsubishi Materials Corporation | Japan |
Tin | Nghe Tinh Non-Ferrous Metals Joint Stock Company | Viet Nam |
Tin | Novosibirsk Integrated Tin Works | Russian Federation |
Tin | O.M. Manufacturing (Thailand) Co., Ltd. | Thailand |
Tin | O.M. Manufacturing Philippines, Inc. | Philippines |
Tin | OMSA | Bolivia |
Tin | PT Alam Lestari Kencana | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Aries Kencana Sejahtera | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Artha Cipta Langgeng | Indonesia |
Tin | PT ATD Makmur Mandiri Jaya | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Babel Inti Perkasa | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Bangka Kudai Tin | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Bangka Putra Karya | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Bangka Timah Utama Sejahtera | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Bangka Tin Industry | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Belitung Industri Sejahtera | Indonesia |
Tin | PT BilliTin Makmur Lestari | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Bukit Timah | Indonesia |
Tin | PT DS Jaya Abadi | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Eunindo Usaha Mandiri | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Fang Di MulTindo | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Inti Stania Prima | Indonesia |
Tin | PT JusTindo | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Karimun Mining | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Mitra Stania Prima | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Panca Mega Persada | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Prima Timah Utama | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Refined Bangka Tin | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Stanindo Inti Perkasa | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Sumber Jaya Indah | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Supra Sukses Trinusa | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Tambang Timah | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Timah (Persero) Tbk Kundur | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Timah (Persero) Tbk Mentok | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Timah Nusantara | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Tinindo Inter Nusa | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Wahana Perkit Jaya | Indonesia |
Tin | Rui Da Hung | Taiwan |
Tin | Soft Metais Ltda. | Brazil |
Tin | Thailand Smelting & Refining Co Ltd | Thailand |
Tin | VQB Mineral and Trading Group JSC | Viet Nam |
Tin | White Solder Metalurgica | Brazil |
Tin | Yunnan Chengfeng Non-ferrous Metals Co., Ltd. | China |
Tin | Yunnan Tin Company, Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | A.L.M.T. TUNGSTEN Corp. | Japan |
|
| | |
Tungsten | Chenzhou Diamond Tungsten Products Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Chongyi Zhangyuan Tungsten Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Dayu Weiliang Tungsten Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Fujian Jinxin Tungsten Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Ganxian Shirui New Material Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Ganzhou Huaxing Tungsten Products Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Ganzhou Jiangwu Ferrotungsten Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Ganzhou Non-ferrous Metals Smelting Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Ganzhou Seadragon W & Mo Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Global Tungsten & Powders Corp. | United States |
Tungsten | Guangdong Xianglu Tungsten Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | H.C. Starck GmbH | Germany |
Tungsten | H.C. Starck Smelting GmbH & Co.KG | Germany |
Tungsten | Hunan Chenzhou Mining Group Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Hunan Chunchang Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Hydrometallurg, JSC | Russian Federation |
Tungsten | Japan New Metals Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Tungsten | Jiangwu H.C. Starck Tungsten Products Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Jiangxi Gan Bei Tungsten Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Jiangxi Minmetals Gao'an Non-ferrous Metals Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Jiangxi Tonggu Non-ferrous Metallurgical & Chemical Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Jiangxi Xinsheng Tungsten Industry Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Jiangxi Yaosheng Tungsten Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Kennametal Fallon | United States |
Tungsten | Kennametal Huntsville | United States |
Tungsten | Malipo Haiyu Tungsten Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Nui Phao H.C. Starck Tungsten Chemicals Manufacturing LLC | Viet Nam |
Tungsten | Tejing (Vietnam) Tungsten Co., Ltd. | Viet Nam |
Tungsten | Vietnam Youngsun Tungsten Industry Co., Ltd. | Viet Nam |
Tungsten | Wolfram Bergbau und Hütten AG | Austria |
Tungsten | Xiamen Tungsten (H.C.) Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Xinhai Rendan Shaoguan Tungsten Co., Ltd. | China |
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024
