NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE
THREE
MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 27, 2016
AND
MARCH 29, 2015
(Dollar amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
(1)
|
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation
|
The consolidated financial statements as of
March 27, 2016
and
December 27, 2015
, and for the
three
-month periods ended
March 27, 2016
and
March 29, 2015
have been prepared by Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The financial information as of
March 27, 2016
and for the
three
-month periods ended
March 27, 2016
and
March 29, 2015
is unaudited, but, in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments and accruals necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods.
References in the remainder of this document to “the Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to the business of Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. and its wholly and majority owned subsidiaries. We operate Buffalo Wild Wings
®
, R Taco
TM
, and PizzaRev
®
restaurants as well as sell Buffalo Wild Wings and R Taco restaurant franchises. In exchange for initial and continuing franchise fees, we give franchisees the right to use the brand names. We operate as a single segment for reporting purposes.
The financial information as of
December 27, 2015
is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended
December 27, 2015
, which are included in Item 8 in the fiscal
2015
Annual Report on Form 10-K, and should be read in conjunction with such financial statements.
The results of operations for the
three
-month period ended
March 27, 2016
are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be achieved for the entire year ending
December 25, 2016
.
Certain amounts as of
December 27, 2015
have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The Company reclassified amounts previously presented separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as amounts due to restricted funds into our system-wide payables, to which they were related. The change in classification does not affect previously reported cash flows from operations or from financing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, or the previously reported Consolidated Statement of Operations for any period.
|
|
(2)
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value (see
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
for our early adoption of the guidance issued in 2015 for inventory measurement). Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out method.
We purchase products from a number of suppliers and believe there are alternative suppliers. We have minimum purchase commitments from some of our vendors, but the terms of the contracts and nature of the products are such that our purchase requirements do not create a market risk. One of the primary food products used by our restaurants and our franchised restaurants is traditional chicken wings. The price we pay for traditional chicken wings is determined based on the average of the previous month’s wing market plus mark-up for processing and distribution. If the monthly average exceeds an upper threshold or falls below a lower threshold set in the contract, we split the impact with our suppliers. For the three-month periods ended
March 27, 2016
and
March 29, 2015
, chicken wings were
25.9%
and
26.5%
, respectively, of restaurant cost of sales.
|
|
(b)
|
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
|
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09 “Revenue with Contracts from Customers.” ASU 2014-09 supersedes the current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The guidance introduces a five-step model to achieve its core principal of the entity recognizing revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The requirements will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the impact of the updated requirements on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases.” ASU 2016-02 requires for lease arrangements spanning more than 12 months, an entity to recognize an asset and liability. The updated guidance is effective
for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. We believe the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will materially impact our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-04, “Liabilities - Extinguishments of Liabilities: Recognition of Breakage for Certain Prepaid Stored-Value Products.” ASU 2016-04 provides specific guidance for the derecognition of prepaid stored-value product liabilities. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. We do not believe it will materially impact our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net).” ASU 2016-08 provides specific guidance to determine whether an entity is providing a specified good or service itself or is arranging for the good or service to be provided by another party. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the impact of the updated requirements on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation: Improvement to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” ASU 2016-09 provides guidance intended to simplify accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual period. We are currently evaluating the impact of the updated guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
We reviewed all other significant newly-issued accounting pronouncements and concluded they are not applicable to our operations.
|
|
(c)
|
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
|
We adopted each of the following four standards as of December 28, 2015, which did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation: Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis.” ASU 2015-02 modifies the analysis that must be performed to determine whether a reporting entity should consolidate certain types of legal entities. The updated guidance was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-05, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software: Customer's Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement.” ASU 2015-05 provides guidance related to a customer's accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement. The updated guidance was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. We adopted this guidance prospectively. Fees that meet the criteria of a software license are capitalized and included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. Amortization expense is recognized over the term of the arrangement and is included in depreciation and amortization expense on our consolidated statements of earnings.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Inventory: Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory.” ASU 2015-11 changed the subsequent measurement of inventory from lower of cost or market to lower of cost and net realizable value. The guidance requires prospective application for the reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and permits adoption in an earlier period. The Company elected early adoption of this guidance as of December 28, 2015.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Business Combinations: Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments.” ASU 2015-16 removes the requirement to retrospectively account for adjustments to preliminary amounts recognized in a business combination. The guidance requires the cumulative impact of a measurement period adjustment (including the impact on prior periods) be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is identified. The prior period impact of the adjustment should be either presented separately on the face of the income statement or disclosed in the notes. The guidance was effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015.
|
|
(3)
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
The guidance for fair value measurements establishes the authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and outlines the required disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We use a three-tier fair value hierarchy based upon observable and non-observable inputs as follows:
•
Level 1 – Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
•
Level 2 – Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
•
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The following table summarizes the financial instruments measured at fair value in our consolidated balance sheet as of
March 27, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable Securities
|
$
|
9,147
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9,147
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent Consideration
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
445
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
8,979
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8,979
|
|
The following table summarizes the financial instruments measured at fair value in our consolidated balance sheet as of
December 27, 2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable Securities
|
$
|
9,043
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9,043
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent Consideration
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
8,958
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8,958
|
|
Our marketable securities were classified as trading securities. Our trading securities and deferred compensation liability comprise investments held for future needs of our non-qualified deferred compensation plan and were reported at fair market value, using the “market approach” valuation technique. The “market approach” valuation method uses prices and other relevant information observable in market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and is a Level 1 approach. Our contingent consideration liabilities represent amounts owed in association with our fiscal year 2015 acquisitions. These liabilities were valued using a Level 3 approach that utilizes an option pricing model and the projected future performance of certain restaurants we acquired. The future performance of these acquired restaurants will ultimately determine the settlement amount of these liabilities. Estimates of fair value are inherently uncertain and represent only management's reasonable expectation regarding future developments. These estimates and the judgments and assumptions upon which the estimates are based will, in all likelihood, differ in some respects from actual future results.
The following table summarizes the activity within Level 3 instruments during the three-month period ended
March 27, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent Consideration Liabilities
|
|
Level 3 balance at December 27, 2015
|
$
|
(1,551
|
)
|
Mark to market adjustment
|
1,106
|
|
Level 3 balance at March 27, 2016
|
$
|
(445
|
)
|
There was no significant activity within Level 3 instruments during the three-month period ended
March 29, 2015
.
There were no significant transfers between the levels of the fair value hierarchy during the
three
-month periods ended
March 27, 2016
and
March 29, 2015
.
|
|
(4)
|
Marketable Securities
|
Marketable securities consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 27,
2016
|
|
December 27,
2015
|
Trading
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds
|
$
|
9,147
|
|
|
9,043
|
|
Total
|
$
|
9,147
|
|
|
9,043
|
|
There were no purchases or sales of available-for-sale securities during the
three
-month period ended
March 27, 2016
. There were purchases totaling
$12,297
and sales totaling
$11,155
of available-for-sale securities during the
three
-month period ended
March 29, 2015
.
|
|
(5)
|
Property and Equipment
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 27,
2016
|
|
December 27,
2015
|
Construction in process
|
$
|
22,193
|
|
|
18,662
|
|
Buildings
|
94,304
|
|
|
92,603
|
|
Capital leases and buildings under deemed landlord financing
|
24,928
|
|
|
25,105
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
361,158
|
|
|
369,344
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
566,312
|
|
|
553,736
|
|
Property and equipment, gross
|
1,068,895
|
|
|
1,059,450
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
(475,225
|
)
|
|
(454,738
|
)
|
Property and equipment, net
|
$
|
593,670
|
|
|
604,712
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
|
Our long-term debt and capital lease obligations consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest rate for the three months ended March 27, 2016
|
|
Maturity
|
|
March 27, 2016
|
|
December 27, 2015
|
Revolving credit facility
|
1.3%
|
|
July 2018
|
|
$
|
7,648
|
|
|
34,530
|
|
Capital lease and deemed landlord financing obligations
|
7.7%
|
|
Various through November 2030
|
|
39,562
|
|
|
38,571
|
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
47,210
|
|
|
73,101
|
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
|
|
(4,787
|
)
|
|
(2,147
|
)
|
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,423
|
|
|
70,954
|
|
We have a
$200,000
unsecured revolving credit facility. Interest is charged at LIBOR plus an applicable margin based on our consolidated total leverage ratio. We also pay a commitment fee on the average unused portion of the facility at a rate per annum based on our consolidated total leverage ratio.
The revolving credit facility contains covenants that require us to maintain certain financial ratios, including consolidated coverage, consolidated total leverage and minimum EBITDA. The revolving credit facility also has other customary affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants that restrict the right of the Company and its subsidiaries to merge, to lease, sell or otherwise dispose of assets, to make investments and to grant liens on their assets. As of
March 27, 2016
, we were in compliance with all of these covenants.
We have
5.4 million
shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our Equity Incentive Plan (Plan) for our employees, officers, and directors. The Plan had
910,099
shares available for grant as of
March 27, 2016
.
The exercise price for stock options issued under the Plan is to be not less than the fair market value on the date of grant with respect to incentive and nonqualified stock options. Stock options vest in
four
equal annual installments and have a contractual life of
seven
years. Incentive stock options may be granted under this Plan until March 12, 2022. We issue new shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options. Option activity is summarized for the
three
months ended
March 27, 2016
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of shares
|
|
Weighted
average
exercise price
|
|
Average remaining contractual life
(years)
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value
|
Outstanding, December 27, 2015
|
131,248
|
|
|
$
|
113.12
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
$
|
7,051
|
|
Exercised
|
(6,392
|
)
|
|
67.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
(3,821
|
)
|
|
152.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, March 27, 2016
|
121,035
|
|
|
$
|
114.26
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
$
|
4,788
|
|
Exercisable, March 27, 2016
|
81,276
|
|
|
95.60
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
4,311
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above is before applicable income taxes, based on our closing stock price of
$144.84
as of the last business day of the
three
-month period ended
March 27, 2016
, which would have been received by the optionees had all options been exercised and sold on that date. As of
March 27, 2016
, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to nonvested stock options was approximately
$1,600
, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately
2.2 years
. During the
three
-month periods ended
March 27, 2016
and
March 29, 2015
, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was
$533
and
$288
, respectively. No shares were granted or vested during the
three
-month periods ended
March 27, 2016
or
March 29, 2015
.
|
|
(b)
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
Restricted stock units are granted annually under the Plan at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors.
We grant restricted stock units subject to
three
-year cliff vesting and a cumulative
three
-year earnings target. The number of units that vest at the end of the three-year period is based on performance against the target. These restricted stock units are subject to forfeiture if they have not vested at the end of the three-year period. Stock-based compensation is recognized for the number of units expected to vest at the end of the period and is expensed beginning on the grant date through the end of the performance period.
For each grant, restricted stock units meeting the performance criteria will vest as of the end of the third fiscal year in the performance period, subject to a Plan-specified maximum number of shares that may be issued to any individual in any year in settlement of restricted stock units. The distribution of vested restricted stock units as common stock typically occurs in March of the following year. The common stock is issued to participants net of the number of shares needed for the required minimum employee withholding taxes. We issue new shares of common stock upon the disbursement of restricted stock units. Restricted stock units are contingently issuable shares, and the activity for the
three
months ended
March 27, 2016
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of shares
|
|
Weighted
average
grant date
fair value
|
Outstanding, December 27, 2015
|
190,120
|
|
|
$
|
161.06
|
|
Cancelled
|
(6,772
|
)
|
|
166.88
|
|
Outstanding, March 27, 2016
|
183,348
|
|
|
$
|
160.85
|
|
As of
March 27, 2016
, the total stock-based compensation expense related to nonvested awards not yet recognized was
$7,181
, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.3
years. No shares were granted or vested during the
three
-month periods ended
March 27, 2016
and
March 29, 2015
. During the
three
-month periods ended
March 27, 2016
and
March 29, 2015
, we recognized
$1,111
and
$2,317
, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock units.
|
|
(c)
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
We have reserved
600,000
shares of common stock for issuance under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). The ESPP is available to substantially all employees subject to employment eligibility requirements. Participants may purchase our common stock at
85%
of the beginning or ending closing price, whichever is lower, for each six-month period ending in May and November. During the
three
-month periods ended
March 27, 2016
, and
March 29, 2015
, we issued
no
shares of common stock under the ESPP. As of
March 27, 2016
, we had
185,758
shares available for future issuance under the ESPP.
|
|
(8)
|
Earnings Per Common Share
|
The following is a reconciliation of basic and fully diluted earnings per common share for the
three
-month periods ended
March 27, 2016
and
March 29, 2015
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 27, 2016
|
|
Earnings
(numerator)
|
|
Shares
(denominator)
|
|
Per-share
amount
|
Net earnings attributable to Buffalo Wild Wings
|
$
|
32,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share
|
32,773
|
|
|
18,922,040
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities – stock options
|
—
|
|
|
35,044
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share – assuming dilution
|
$
|
32,773
|
|
|
18,957,084
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 29, 2015
|
|
Earnings
(numerator)
|
|
Shares
(denominator)
|
|
Per-share
amount
|
Net earnings attributable to Buffalo Wild Wings
|
$
|
29,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share
|
29,063
|
|
|
18,992,965
|
|
|
$
|
1.53
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities – stock options
|
—
|
|
|
81,363
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share – assuming dilution
|
$
|
29,063
|
|
|
19,074,328
|
|
|
$
|
1.52
|
|
The following is a summary of those securities outstanding at the end of the respective periods, which have been excluded from the fully diluted calculations because the effect on net earnings per common share would have been antidilutive or were performance-granted shares for which the performance criteria had not yet been met:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended
|
|
March 27,
2016
|
|
March 29,
2015
|
Stock options
|
49,094
|
|
|
6,691
|
|
Restricted stock units
|
183,348
|
|
|
242,471
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
March 27,
2016
|
|
March 29,
2015
|
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
$
|
(9,786
|
)
|
|
2,096
|
|
Interest
|
867
|
|
|
—
|
|
Noncash financing and investing transactions:
|
|
|
|
Decrease in property and equipment not yet paid for
|
(3,326
|
)
|
|
(2,311
|
)
|
Increase in deemed owner assets and obligations
|
1,490
|
|
|
—
|
|
Increase in property and equipment and liabilities from hosted software arrangements
|
1,151
|
|
|
—
|
|
(10)
Contingencies
We have a limited guarantee of the borrowings of Pie Squared Pizza, LLC, a subsidiary of Pie Squared Holdings, LLC, in the amount of
$575
.
On June 2, 2015, two of our former employees (the “plaintiffs”) filed a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and putative class action under New York state law against us in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York. The claim alleges that we have a policy or procedure requiring employees who receive compensation in part through tip credits to perform work that is ineligible for tip credit compensation at a tip credit rate in violation of the FLSA and New York state law. We intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit. We believe a loss is reasonably possible, but we are currently unable to reasonably estimate the amount of loss.
In addition to the litigation described above, we are involved in various other legal matters arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.