Current Report Filing (8-k)
March 02 2015 - 1:33PM
Edgar (US Regulatory)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported):
|
|
February 26, 2015
|
BroadVision, Inc.
__________________________________________
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
1-34205
|
94-3184303
|
_____________________
(State or other jurisdiction
|
_____________
(Commission
|
______________
(I.R.S. Employer
|
of incorporation)
|
File Number)
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1700 Seaport Blvd, Suite 210,
Redwood City, California
|
|
94063
|
_________________________________
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
___________
(Zip Code)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
|
|
(650) 331-1000
|
______________________________________________
Former name or former address, if changed since last report
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure
On February 26, 2015, BroadVision, Inc. (the “Company”) sent a letter to Marlin Capital Investments, LLC on behalf of the Company’s Board of Directors. A copy of this letter is furnished herewith as Exhibit 99.1.
The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(c) Exhibits.
99.1 Letter to Marlin Capital Investments, LLC dated February 26, 2015
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BroadVision, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2, 2015
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Peter Chu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Peter Chu
|
|
|
|
|
Title: Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Strategy and Product Management
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Letter to Marlin Capital Investments, LLC dated February 26, 2015
|
February 26, 2015
VIA Federal Express next business day delivery
Mr. Michael Brauser
Mr. Barry Honig
Marlin Capital Investments, LLC
555 S. Federal Highway, #450
Baton Raton, FL 33432
Re:BroadVision, Inc. Board of Directors Response to Marlin correspondence filed with the SEC on January 30, 2015
Gentlemen:
On behalf of the Board of Directors of BroadVision, Inc., I am responding to your letter dated January 29, 2015 addressed to the Board, which the Board has not received directly but which you filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2015. The Board has carefully reviewed the various business options available to BroadVision at this time, including, but not limited to, the short-term measures suggested by Marlin of distributing the cash on hand to shareholders and auctioning the Company or receiving additional investment from Marlin and handing over leadership of the Company to you. After careful consideration of these options, as well as the Company’s near-term financial plan, the Board has unanimously concluded that the courses of action you propose would not be in the best interests of BroadVision or its stockholders and that those interests would be best served by BroadVision continuing to follow the strategy it is currently pursuing.
As you are aware, less than a week after you published your letter, BroadVision reached a major and long anticipated inflection point with the announcement of broad availability of its new Vmoso enterprise communication and collaboration solution. This milestone came after a multi-year design and development process involving many millions of dollars of investment and built on the foundation of BroadVision’s previous products, notably including its Clearvale enterprise portal offering. The cash burn of which you complain in your letter represents, in large part, the investment of resources that is required to develop any software product that hopes to succeed in the demanding marketplace for enterprise-grade solutions.
It is too early in the launch process to know how successful Vmoso will be, but BroadVision’s Board and management team are firmly committed to giving it the marketing and sales support and time it will need to win in a marketplace that—as you point out—is hot enough to have attracted multiple competitors. It would be a curious decision indeed for any company to take one of the disruptive paths you have suggested in the earliest stages of the launch of a brand new on-trend product on which the company’s future success is dependent.
In the Board’s opinion, BroadVision’s clear strategic focus on driving Vmoso’s success is a better use of the Company’s cash resources and is far better attuned to changing market realities than any of the available alternatives, including those you have proposed. Transformations such as the one currently underway at BroadVision often take years for results to be realized, and the Board’s expectation is that the Company’s continued investment in Vmoso will best position BroadVision to produce positive results for shareholders in the future. The Board is fully committed to the Company and its long-term objectives, realistic expectations, and goals.
The contentions in your letter about the related party transactions noted in the Company’s SEC filings reflect a complete misreading by you of the disclosures. The Board rejects any suggestion that there is anything hidden in the relationships or any value being transferred through them from BroadVision to its officers. The ownership structure of BVOD, the Company’s subsidiary in China, has been fully disclosed in SEC filings since it was first established in 2008. As those filings state, the structure was put in place in connection with the Company’s CHRM product, and the indirect interest in BVOD held by corporate officers relates solely to their potential participation in 20% of any gain from a sale of BVOD by BroadVision. Given CHRM’s limited commercial success, BroadVision does not anticipate that any such gain will ever arise. BVOD, which employs a workforce of engineers in China, is now used by the Company for outsourced engineering services; payments are made quarterly, under a cost-plus contract, for services rendered. Historically, BVOD'S operating expenses have exceeded its revenue. None of BroadVision’s officers have derived any additional income or benefit from this arrangement. Furthermore, the Board is comfortable that the compensation arrangements of the Company’s executive officers are in line with, and certainly not above, industry norms for comparable positions.
Sincerely,
By: /s/ Sandra Adams
Sandra Adams
Vice President & General Counsel
cc: Pehong Chen, President & CEO, BroadVision
Peter Chu, Chief Financial Officer, BroadVision
BroadVision (NASDAQ:BVSN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
BroadVision (NASDAQ:BVSN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024