UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2014
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period
from ____ to _____
Commission file number
000-22166
ATRM HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant
as Specified in Its Charter)
Minnesota |
|
41-1439182 |
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification No.) |
2350
Helen Street, North St. Paul, Minnesota |
|
55109 |
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip
Code) |
(651)
770-2000
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
N/A
(Former
Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer [ ] |
Accelerated
filer [ ] |
Non-accelerated
filer [ ] |
Smaller
reporting company [X] |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ]
No [X]
As
of March 27, 2015, 1,186,473 shares of Common Stock of the Registrant were outstanding.
ATRM
HOLDINGS, INC.
INDEX
PART
1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial Statements
ATRM
HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
| |
September 30, 2014 | | |
December 31, 2013 | |
| |
(Unaudited) | | |
| |
Current assets: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents | |
$ | 1,908 | | |
$ | 1,260 | |
Accounts receivable, net | |
| 4,967 | | |
| — | |
Costs and estimated profit in excess of billings | |
| 2,573 | | |
| — | |
Inventories | |
| 2,146 | | |
| — | |
Fair value of contingent earn-outs, current | |
| 1,000 | | |
| 325 | |
Other current assets | |
| 579 | | |
| 323 | |
Current assets – discontinued operations | |
| — | | |
| 2,386 | |
Total current assets | |
| 13,173 | | |
| 4,294 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | |
| 4,795 | | |
| — | |
Property and equipment, net – discontinued operations | |
| — | | |
| 81 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Fair value of contingent earn-out, noncurrent | |
| 1,200 | | |
| — | |
Goodwill | |
| 1,733 | | |
| — | |
Intangible assets, net | |
| 1,858 | | |
| — | |
Other assets | |
| 10 | | |
| 247 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total assets | |
$ | 22,769 | | |
$ | 4,622 | |
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Note payable | |
$ | 5,500 | | |
$ | — | |
Current portion of long-term debt | |
| 45 | | |
| — | |
Trade accounts payable | |
| 5,273 | | |
| 95 | |
Billings in excess of costs and estimated profit | |
| 444 | | |
| — | |
Accrued compensation | |
| 378 | | |
| 18 | |
Other accrued liabilities | |
| 2,146 | | |
| 130 | |
Current liabilities – discontinued operations | |
| — | | |
| 525 | |
Total current liabilities | |
| 13,786 | | |
| 768 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Long-term debt, less current portion | |
| 11,052 | | |
| 3 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Commitments and contingencies | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Shareholders’ equity (deficit): | |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock, $.001 par value; 3,000,000 shares authorized; 1,079,176 shares
issued and outstanding | |
| 1 | | |
| 1 | |
Additional paid-in capital | |
| 65,835 | | |
| 65,830 | |
Accumulated deficit | |
| (67,905 | ) | |
| (61,980 | ) |
Total shareholders’ equity (deficit) | |
| (2,069 | ) | |
| 3,851 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity (deficit) | |
$ | 22,769 | | |
$ | 4,622 | |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
ATRM
HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands, except per share data)
| |
Three months ended
September 30, | | |
Nine months ended
September 30, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Net sales | |
$ | 10,310 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 22,699 | | |
$ | — | |
Costs and expenses: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cost of sales | |
| 9,845 | | |
| — | | |
| 21,431 | | |
| — | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | |
| 1,142 | | |
| 591 | | |
| 4,423 | | |
| 2,139 | |
Goodwill impairment charge | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 3,705 | | |
| — | |
Total costs and expenses | |
| 10,987 | | |
| 591 | | |
| 29,559 | | |
| 2,139 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Loss from continuing operations | |
| (677 | ) | |
| (591 | ) | |
| (6,860 | ) | |
| (2,139 | ) |
Other income (expense): | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Change in fair value of contingent earn-out | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 103 | | |
| — | |
Interest expense | |
| (277 | ) | |
| — | | |
| (493 | ) | |
| (2 | ) |
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes | |
| (954 | ) | |
| (591 | ) | |
| (7,250 | ) | |
| (2,141 | ) |
Income tax benefit | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 464 | | |
| — | |
Loss from continuing operations | |
| (954 | ) | |
| (591 | ) | |
| (6,786 | ) | |
| (2,141 | ) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | |
| — | | |
| 567 | | |
| 861 | | |
| (648 | ) |
Net loss | |
$ | (954 | ) | |
$ | (24 | ) | |
$ | (5,925 | ) | |
$ | (2,789 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Income (loss) per share – basic and diluted: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Continuing operations | |
$ | (0.88 | ) | |
$ | (0.55 | ) | |
$ | (6.29 | ) | |
$ | (1.99 | ) |
Discontinued operations | |
| — | | |
| 0.53 | | |
| .80 | | |
| (0.60 | ) |
Net loss | |
$ | (0.88 | ) | |
$ | (0.02 | ) | |
$ | (5.49 | ) | |
$ | (2.59 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted | |
| 1,079 | | |
| 1,078 | | |
| 1,079 | | |
| 1,078 | |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
ATRM
HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands)
| |
Nine months ended September 30, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
$ | (5,925 | ) | |
$ | (2,789 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Depreciation and amortization expense | |
| 997 | | |
| 52 | |
Goodwill impairment charge | |
| 3,705 | | |
| — | |
Share-based compensation expense | |
| 5 | | |
| 172 | |
Gain on sale of discontinued operations | |
| (1,128 | ) | |
| (1,021 | ) |
Change in fair value of contingent earn-out | |
| (103 | ) | |
| — | |
Credit to allowance for bad debts | |
| — | | |
| (25 | ) |
Provision for excess and obsolete inventories | |
| — | | |
| 1,177 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts receivable | |
| (609 | ) | |
| (216 | ) |
Costs and estimated profit in excess of billings | |
| (2,028 | ) | |
| — | |
Inventories | |
| 498 | | |
| 200 | |
Other current assets | |
| (207 | ) | |
| 65 | |
Other assets | |
| 338 | | |
| 8 | |
Trade accounts payable | |
| (1,275 | ) | |
| 193 | |
Billings in excess of costs and estimated profit | |
| 132 | | |
| — | |
Accrued compensation | |
| 6 | | |
| (216 | ) |
Other accrued liabilities | |
| 1,011 | | |
| (202 | ) |
Net cash used in operating activities | |
| (4,583 | ) | |
| (2,602 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Purchase of business, net of cash acquired | |
| (4,568 | ) | |
| — | |
Proceeds from earn-out consideration | |
| 428 | | |
| — | |
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations, net of transaction costs | |
| — | | |
| 1,651 | |
Purchase of property and equipment | |
| (193 | ) | |
| (5 | ) |
Net cash generated by (used in) investing activities | |
| (4,333 | ) | |
| 1,646 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | |
| 11,000 | | |
| — | |
Payment of debt assumed and paid at closing of business purchase | |
| (1,401 | ) | |
| — | |
Principal payments on long-term debt | |
| (35 | ) | |
| (21 | ) |
Net cash generated by (used in) financing activities | |
| 9,564 | | |
| (21 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | |
| 648 | | |
| (977 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | |
| 1,260 | | |
| 3,013 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | |
$ | 1,908 | | |
$ | 2,036 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental cash flow information: | |
| | | |
| | |
Promissory note payable issued as partial consideration for purchase of business | |
$ | 5,500 | | |
$ | — | |
Contingent earn-out receivable received as part of product line disposition | |
$ | 2,200 | | |
$ | — | |
Cash paid for interest expense | |
$ | 167 | | |
$ | 3 | |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
ATRM
HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. |
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
AND LIQUIDITY |
Basis
of Presentation:
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ATRM Holdings, Inc. and its wholly
owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. References in the notes
to the condensed consolidated financial statements to “ATRM,” “the Company”, “we,” “us”
or “our”, unless the context otherwise requires, refer to ATRM Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries and their respective
predecessors. Our modular housing business is operated by our wholly-owned subsidiaries KBS Builders, Inc. and Maine Modular Haulers,
Inc. (collectively referred to as “KBS”). Effective December 5, 2014, our name was changed from “Aetrium Incorporated”
to “ATRM Holdings, Inc.”
The
condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2013 has been derived from our audited financial statements. In the opinion
of management, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal,
recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim
periods presented. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative
of the operating results to be expected for the full year or any future period.
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included
in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to such rules and regulations. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2013.
Liquidity:
ATRM
has implemented significant strategic initiatives in the past several quarters intended to stabilize the Company and return it
to profitability. In July 2013, as described in Note 4, we sold the assets related to our Reliability Test Products (“RTP”)
line of products. On April 2, 2014, as described in Note 3, we acquired a business that manufactures modular housing units for
commercial and residential applications. On April 22, 2014, as described in Note 4, we entered into an agreement to transfer the
assets related to our test handler product line to a larger semiconductor equipment company in exchange for future royalty payments.
We
have incurred significant operating losses and, as of September 30, 2014, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $68 million.
In recent years, the losses have been primarily attributed to the operations of our former test handler product line operations
and significant legal expenses related to litigation. There can be no assurance that the strategic initiatives described above
will lead to sufficient revenue in the future to cover our expenses and achieve profitability for ATRM on a consistent basis or
at all. In addition, we incurred substantial debt in connection with the acquisition of the assets and liabilities related to
the operations of KBS. To finance the acquisition, we issued $6.5 million in promissory notes to Lone Star Value Investors, LP
(“LSVI”) and a $5.5 million promissory note (the “KBS Note”) to the seller with an original maturity date
of October 1, 2014. We reached an agreement with the holder of the KBS Note to extend its maturity date to December 1, 2014. The
Company was unable to repay the note on that date and it remains unpaid as of the date of this report. The Company is seeking
to renegotiate the terms of the KBS Note or obtain alternative financing to repay it. There can be no assurance that our existing
cash reserves, together with funds generated by our operations and any future financings, will be sufficient to satisfy our debt
payment obligations. Our inability to generate funds or obtain financing sufficient to satisfy our debt payment obligations may
result in such obligations being accelerated by our lenders, which would likely have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations. Given these uncertainties, there can be no assurance that our existing cash reserves
will be sufficient to avoid liquidity issues and/or fund operations beyond this fiscal year.
In addition, as
discussed in Note 15, we received cash to fund our working capital needs during the second half of fiscal year 2014 and early
2015 from LSVI and its affiliate Lone Star Value Co-Invest I, LP (“LSV Co-Invest”) in exchange for unsecured promissory
notes issued to these entities. As of the date of this report, the Company’s total debt owed under promissory notes, including
the KBS Note, was approximately $16.0 million. We intend to pursue new financing to re-finance all or a portion of our debt and
to provide for our general working capital needs going forward. There can be no assurance we will be successful in obtaining any
such new financing, with terms favorable to us or at all.
2. |
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
The
following significant accounting policies were implemented or modified during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 as a result of our
acquisition of the assets and liabilities related to the operations of KBS and the divestiture of our test handler product line
operations described above:
Use
of Estimates: The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant estimates include those related
to revenue recognition (including estimates of costs and profit under the percentage of completion method of accounting), customer
rebates, allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of inventories, valuation of contingent consideration, goodwill impairment
analysis, the assessment of impairment of intangible and other long-lived assets, asset lives used in computing depreciation and
amortization, purchase price allocations of businesses acquired, income taxes, share-based compensation expense, health insurance
expense accruals and accruals for contingencies, including legal matters. Such estimates require significant judgment. At the
time they are made, such estimates are believed to be reasonable when considered in conjunction with the consolidated financial
position and results of operations taken as a whole. However, actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences
may be material to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition: Commercial projects, which include multi-unit residential buildings such as apartment buildings,
condominiums, townhouses, and dormitories as well as commercial structures such as hospitals and office buildings are manufactured
to customer specifications and may take up to several months to complete. Some commercial contracts provide that we perform services
at the customer’s site to complete a project, including electrical, plumbing, heating and air conditioning services (“site
work”) and some contracts provide that we only manufacture, deliver and set the modular units on the foundation, in which
cases the site work is performed by others. Except for a small number of homes we sell directly, contracts for single family homes
do not include site work, which is performed by independent builders, and the homes are generally delivered and set on the foundation
within a few days after being manufactured.
We
recognize revenue for modular units and site work using the percentage of completion method. Percentage of completion is determined
using a units-of-production methodology based on modules delivered in accordance with the terms of the contract for the modular
units and cost-to-cost method with cost determined based on work completed as approved by the project owner for site work. Sales
tax billed to customers is excluded from revenue. Transportation and freight billed to customers is recorded as revenue and the
related costs are included in cost of sales. The current asset “Costs and estimated profit in excess of billings”
represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed and the current liability “Billings in excess of costs and estimated
profit” represents billings in excess of revenues recognized.
Application
of the cost-to-cost percentage of completion method of accounting requires the use of estimates of costs to be incurred in completing
our performance under a contract. The cost estimating process is based on the knowledge and experience of management and involves
making significant judgments. Changes in contract performance, change orders, estimated profitability, final contract settlements
and other factors may result in changes to estimated and actual costs and profit. The effects of such changes are recognized in
the period in which the revisions are determined.
Customer
Rebate Program: We have a rebate program for some builders based on sales volume. Rebates are recorded as a reduction of net
sales in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. The rebate liability is included in other accrued liabilities in
our condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Property,
Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment purchased in the acquisition of KBS described in Note 3 were recorded
at their estimated fair values and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Estimated useful
lives are as follows: buildings and improvements - 30 years; machinery and equipment - 3 to 7 years. When assets are sold or retired,
the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is recorded. Maintenance
and repairs are expensed as incurred and major improvements are capitalized.
Business
Combinations: We account for business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting. The purchase price
of an acquired business is allocated to the acquired tangible and intangible assets and the assumed liabilities on the basis of
their respective fair values on the date of acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the separately
identifiable acquired assets and assumed liabilities is allocated to goodwill. The valuation of acquired assets and assumed liabilities
requires significant judgments and is subject to revision as additional information about the fair value of assets and liabilities
becomes available. Additional information, which existed as of the acquisition date but at that time was unknown to us, may become
known during the remainder of the measurement period, a period not to exceed 12 months from the acquisition date. Adjustments
in the purchase price allocation may result in a change in the amount allocated to goodwill. All acquisition-related costs are
expensed as incurred.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets: Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed annually in order to determine whether
their carrying value exceeds their fair value. In addition, they are tested on an interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances
change between annual tests that would more likely than not reduce their fair value below carrying value. If we determine the
fair value of goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets is less than their carrying value as a result of the tests,
an impairment loss is recognized. Impairment losses, if any, are reflected in operating income or loss in the period incurred.
We
review finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever an event occurs or circumstances change which indicates that the
carrying amount of such assets may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability is determined based on an estimate of undiscounted
future cash flows resulting from the use of an asset and its eventual disposition. An impairment loss is measured by comparing
the fair value of the asset to its carrying value. If we determine the fair value of an asset is less than the carrying value,
an impairment loss is incurred. Impairment losses, if any, are reflected in operating income or loss in our consolidated statements
of operations during the period incurred.
Self-Insurance
Costs: We maintain a self-insurance program for a portion of our employee health care costs. Self-insurance costs are
accrued based on actual reported claims plus an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. The portion of the accrual related
to unreported claims is estimated based on an analysis of historical claims experience and other assumptions. Accruals for such
costs could be significantly impacted if future events and claims differ from these assumptions.
Net
Loss per Common Share: Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number
of common shares outstanding during each period. The computation of diluted loss per share excludes the impact of stock options
and the assumed conversion of convertible securities because they would be antidilutive.
On
April 2, 2014, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with KBS Building Systems, Inc., certain of its affiliates
(collectively “KBS Building Systems”) and their owner, pursuant to which we purchased substantially all of KBS Building
Systems’ assets and assumed certain of its liabilities related to its business of manufacturing, selling, and distributing
modular housing units for residential and commercial use. Consideration for the acquisition included $5.0 million in cash paid
at closing, the KBS Note in the principal amount of $5.5 million and the assumption of certain other liabilities. In addition,
we assumed certain debt of approximately $1.4 million which we paid at closing. The acquired assets included approximately $0.4
million in cash, resulting in a net purchase price of approximately $10.1 million. The net purchase price was allocated as follows
(in thousands):
Assets, excluding acquired cash: | |
| |
Accounts receivable (1) | |
$ | 4,062 | |
Costs and estimated profit in excess of billings | |
| 545 | |
Inventories | |
| 1,766 | |
Prepaid expenses | |
| 34 | |
Property, plant and equipment (2) | |
| 4,749 | |
Noncurrent assets | |
| 101 | |
Goodwill (3) | |
| 5,438 | |
Trademarks (3) | |
| 290 | |
Other intangible assets: | |
| | |
Customer relationships (4) | |
| 1,420 | |
Purchased backlog (4) | |
| 990 | |
Total assets | |
| 19,395 | |
| |
| | |
Liabilities assumed: | |
| | |
Accounts payable | |
| 6,314 | |
Billings in excess of costs and estimated profit | |
| 312 | |
Accrued compensation | |
| 305 | |
Other accrued expenses | |
| 873 | |
Long-term debt assumed | |
| 122 | |
Debt assumed and paid at closing | |
| 1,401 | |
Total liabilities assumed | |
| 9,327 | |
| |
| | |
Total net assets acquired | |
$ | 10,068 | |
|
(1) |
The
fair value of acquired accounts receivable was determined to be $4,062, with the gross contractual amount being $4,632. We
determined that $570 would be uncollectible. |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
The
fair value of property, plant and equipment was determined based primarily on independent appraisals. |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Goodwill
and trademarks are considered indefinite-lived assets and are not subject to future amortization, but will be tested for impairment
at least annually. As described in Note 7, the Company completed an assessment of goodwill for potential impairment as of
June 30, 2014 and recorded a charge to reduce the carrying value of goodwill at that date. |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Capitalized
customer relationships will be amortized on a straight line basis over an estimated life of seven years. Purchased backlog
will be amortized as the related revenue is recognized. |
The purchase price
was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of
the acquisition date. The fair value measurements of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were based on valuations involving
significant unobservable inputs, or Level 3 in the valuation hierarchy.
KBS
results are included in our condensed consolidated statement of operations since April 2, 2014, the date of acquisition. The following
unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of ATRM and KBS Buildings Systems as if the acquisition
had occurred on January 1, 2013 (in thousands):
| |
Three months ended
September 30, | | |
Nine months ended September 30, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Pro forma net sales | |
$ | 10,310 | | |
$ | 9,912 | | |
$ | 32,543 | | |
$ | 27,026 | |
Pro forma loss from continuing operations | |
| (804 | ) | |
| (2,419 | ) | |
| (7,593 | ) | |
| (7,406 | ) |
Pro forma net loss | |
| (804 | ) | |
| (1,852 | ) | |
| (6,732 | ) | |
| (8,054 | ) |
Pro forma loss per share – basic and diluted | |
$ | (0.75 | ) | |
$ | (1.72 | ) | |
$ | (6.24 | ) | |
$ | (7.47 | ) |
The
above unaudited pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of what our consolidated results of operations actually
would have been or what results may be expected in the future.
We
incurred expenses for professional fees associated with the acquisition of approximately $0.8 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2014 ($0.1 million and $0.7 million in the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014, respectively),
including a financial advisor fee of $0.5 million. These costs are included in the caption “Selling, general and administrative
expenses” in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
4. |
SALE OF PRODUCT
LINES - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
Test
Handler Product Line
On
April 22, 2014, we entered into an Agreement (the “BSA Agreement”) with Boston Semi Equipment LLC (“BSE”)
and Boston Semi Automation LLC (“BSA”), a wholly owned subsidiary of BSE, pursuant to which we transferred our assets
related to our business of designing, manufacturing, marketing and servicing equipment used in the handling of integrated circuits
(“test handler product line”) to BSA.
The
BSA Agreement provided for the following:
|
● |
BSA
will pay to ATRM a royalty on all revenue related to the test handler product line over approximately five years (April 22,
2014 through December 31, 2018) that will start at 15% and decline over time to 3%, subject to certain qualifications and
adjustments. The first royalty payment covering the period April 22, 2014 through December 31, 2014 amounted to approximately
$0.8 million and was received in January 2015. Subsequent payments are due 60 days after the end of each calendar quarter. |
|
|
|
|
● |
ATRM
transferred all inventories, certain equipment, intellectual property, and certain other assets associated with the test handler
product line to BSA. |
|
|
|
|
● |
BSA
assumed certain liabilities related to the test handler product line, including certain accounts payable, accrued expenses
and product support and warranty obligations. |
|
|
|
|
● |
BSA
and ATRM executed a sublease and transition services agreement providing for BSA to continue to operate the test handler product
line in approximately 15,000 square feet within ATRM’s leased facility in North St. Paul, MN and for each party to provide
certain administrative services to the other. The sublease provides for initial monthly rental payments of $19,930 and the
term extends through August 31, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
● |
16
of ATRM’s employees that were associated with the test handler product line were hired by BSA. |
We
recorded a pre-tax gain of approximately $1.1 million on the sale of the test handler product line in the quarter ended June 30,
2014 as follows (in thousands):
Proceeds: | |
| | |
Fair value of contingent earn-out (royalty stream) | |
$ | 2,200 | |
| |
| | |
Carrying value of net assets transferred: | |
| | |
Inventories | |
| 1,197 | |
Equipment | |
| 73 | |
Accounts payable | |
| (116 | ) |
Accrued liabilities | |
| (82 | ) |
Total net assets transferred | |
| 1,072 | |
| |
| | |
Gain on sale | |
$ | 1,128 | |
Assets
and liabilities included in our condensed consolidated balance sheets and results of operations included in our condensed consolidated
statements of operations related to the test handler product line have been reclassified and presented as discontinued operations
for all periods presented.
Assets
and liabilities related to the test handler product line presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated balance sheet
as of December 31, 2013 are summarized below (in thousands):
Accounts receivable | |
$ | 296 | |
Inventories | |
| 2,075 | |
Prepaid expenses | |
| 15 | |
Current assets – discontinued operations | |
$ | 2,386 | |
| |
| | |
Property and equipment | |
$ | 1,360 | |
Less, accumulated depreciation | |
| (1,279 | ) |
Property and equipment, net – discontinued operations | |
$ | 81 | |
| |
| | |
Capitalized lease obligation | |
$ | 35 | |
Accounts payable | |
| 256 | |
Accrued compensation | |
| 109 | |
Accrued warranty | |
| 16 | |
Other accrued liabilities | |
| 109 | |
Current liabilities – discontinued operations | |
$ | 525 | |
Reliability
Test (RTP) Product Line
In
July 2013, we sold the assets related to our RTP line of products to Cascade Microtech, Inc. (“Cascade”). The RTP
product line includes test equipment that provides semiconductor manufacturers with structural performance data to aid in the
evaluation and improvement of IC designs and manufacturing processes to increase IC yield and reliability.
The
purchase price included $1.9 million received at closing plus the following:
|
● |
$0.5
million holdback amount to secure ATRM’s obligations related to representations, warranties and covenants, $0.3 million
of which was payable on July 31, 2014 and $0.2 million of which was payable on January 15, 2015, subject to deduction of any
indemnification payments to Cascade; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
A
contingent earn-out payment of up to $1.0 million based on RTP net revenues generated during the nine months ended April 30,
2014. |
In
May 2014, we received approximately $0.4 million in final settlement of the contingent earn-out. There are no additional amounts
to be received for the contingent earn-out. On July 30, 2014, Cascade informed us that it would continue to hold back the $0.3
million of holdback amount that was due on July 31, 2014, pending resolution of certain indemnification claims made by Cascade.
In October 2014, we reached a settlement agreement with Cascade whereby Cascade and ATRM released all claims against each other
and Cascade agreed to pay $0.4 million of the total $0.5 million holdback amount, including the payment due in January 2015. We
received the settlement payment of $0.4 million on October 10, 2014. Therefore, no further payments will be received from Cascade.
Facility
Expense Accrual
After
the sale of our RTP product line to Cascade in 2013 and the transfer of our test handler product line to BSA on April 22, 2014,
ATRM has no manufacturing operations remaining in North St. Paul, Minnesota. The lease for our North St. Paul facility, which
consists of approximately 45,000 square feet, expires on August 31, 2015. Approximately one-half of the space in this facility
has been subleased to Cascade and BSA through the end of our lease. We have also entered into administrative services agreements
with Cascade and BSA that provide for copier and computer network services among other things. The remaining half of the facility
is unutilized.
As
a result of the divestitures of our businesses in Minnesota, we determined that ATRM will not receive economic benefit from its
facility, copier and IT equipment leases at the North St. Paul location over their remaining terms, and liabilities related to
these contracts should be recorded at net settlement value at April 22, 2014 (the “cease-use date”). Based on an analysis
of future projected net cash flows, including costs for the facility, copiers and computer network contracts that will continue
to be incurred without economic benefit to ATRM and income we expect to receive from the sublease agreements with Cascade and
BSA, we determined the net settlement value of the liability related to these contracts to be $264,000 at April 22, 2014. Therefore,
we recorded a charge for this amount in the quarter ended June 30, 2014. This charge is included in income (loss) from discontinued
operations in our condensed consolidated statement of operations. As of September 30, 2014, the accrued facility expense amounted
to $226,000, which amount is in “Other accrued liabilities” in our condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Condensed
operating results for the test handler and RTP product lines are presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements
of operations and are summarized below (in thousands):
| |
Three months ended
September 30, | | |
Nine months ended
September 30, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Net sales | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 751 | | |
$ | 2,376 | | |
$ | 3,142 | |
Costs and expenses: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cost of sales | |
| — | | |
| 792 | | |
| 1,400 | | |
| 2,719 | |
Operating expenses | |
| — | | |
| 413 | | |
| 779 | | |
| 2,092 | |
Total costs and expenses | |
| — | | |
| 1,205 | | |
| 2,179 | | |
| 4,811 | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | |
| — | | |
| (454 | ) | |
| 197 | | |
| (1,669 | ) |
Gain on sale of discontinued operations | |
| — | | |
| 1,021 | | |
| 1,128 | | |
| 1,021 | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | |
| — | | |
| 567 | | |
| 1,325 | | |
| (648 | ) |
Income tax expense | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| (464 | ) | |
| — | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 567 | | |
$ | 861 | | |
$ | (648 | ) |
5. |
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS |
We
determine the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on a framework with a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes
the inputs used to measure fair value for three broad categories of financial assets and liabilities as follows:
|
● |
Level
1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Level
2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices
for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated
by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Level
3 – Inputs that are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimate of assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
The
carrying amounts of our cash equivalents, accounts receivable, costs in excess of billings and estimated profit, other current
assets, trade accounts payable, billings in excess of costs and estimated profit, and accrued expenses at September 30, 2014 approximate
fair value due to the short term maturities of these instruments.
Financial
assets reported at fair value on a recurring basis include the following at September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
| |
Level 1 | | |
Level 2 | | |
Level 3 | |
Contingent earn-out receivable related to the transfer of test handler product line (1): | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Current portion | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 1,000 | |
Noncurrent portion | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 1,200 | |
Total | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 2,200 | |
|
(1) |
The
contingent earn-out receivable represents a royalty stream payable to ATRM in connection with the transfer of our test handler
product line to BSA on April 22, 2014 as discussed in Note 4. The first royalty payment covering the period April 22, 2014
through December 31, 2014 was due on March 1, 2015. As disclosed in Note 4, this initial payment amounted to approximately
$0.8 million and was received in January 2015. Subsequent payments are due 60 days after the end of each calendar quarter.
We determined the fair value of the contingent earn-out receivable as of the closing date and reassess the fair value each
quarter. The initial fair value of the royalty stream was determined to be $2.2 million as of April 22, 2014, which was determined
using discounted cash flow techniques. The key assumption in our fair value assessment was the projected amount and timing
of future qualified sales from the test handler product line. We reassessed the fair value as of September 30, 2014 and determined
it to be $2.2 million at that date. |
Assets
reported at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include the following at September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
| |
Level 1 | | |
Level 2 | | |
Level 3 | | |
Total Gains
(Losses) | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Goodwill (1) | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 1,733 | | |
$ | (3,705 | ) |
|
(1) | The
goodwill was recorded in connection with the KBS acquisition on April 2, 2014 as disclosed
in Notes 3 and 7. We recorded an impairment charge of $3.7 million in the nine month
period ended September 30, 2014 as described in Note 7. |
The
following table summarizes the activity for our Level 3 assets measured on a recurring basis (in thousands):
| |
Earn-Out
Receivable (1) | | |
Earn-Out
Receivable (2) | |
| |
| | |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | |
$ | 325 | | |
$ | — | |
Add – fair value at closing of transfer of test hander product line
on April 22, 2014 | |
| | | |
| 2,200 | |
Add - increase based on reassessments (included in earnings) | |
| 103 | | |
| — | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Settlement | |
| (428 | ) | |
| — | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Balance at September 30, 2014 | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 2,200 | |
|
(1) |
Earn-out receivable
related to the sale of our RTP product line (see Note 4). |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Earn-out receivable
related to the transfer of our test handler product line (see Note 4). |
The
following table summarizes the activity for our Level 3 assets measured on a nonrecurring basis (in thousands):
| |
Goodwill | |
| |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | |
$ | — | |
Add – goodwill recorded on April 2, 2014 in connection
with KBS acquisition | |
| 5,438 | |
| |
| | |
Subtract – goodwill impairment recorded at June
30, 2014 (included in earnings) | |
| (3,705 | ) |
| |
| | |
Balance at September 30, 2014 | |
$ | 1,733 | |
Quantitative
information about Level 3 fair value measurements on a recurring basis at September 30, 2014 is summarized in the table below:
Fair Value Asset | |
Valuation Technique | |
Unobservable Input | |
| Amount | |
Contingent earn-out receivable (royalty stream) | |
Discounted cash flow | |
Revenue during royalty period | |
| $33
million | |
| |
| |
Performance weighted average | |
| 60%
to 125% | |
Quantitative
information about Level 3 fair value measurements on a nonrecurring basis at September 30, 2014 is summarized in the table below:
Fair
Value Asset | | |
Valuation Technique | |
Unobservable Input | |
| Amount | |
Goodwill | | |
Discounted cash flow | |
Revenue growth rates | |
| -8%
to 3 | % |
| | |
| |
Undiscounted cash flows | |
| $11
million | |
| | |
| |
Discount rate | |
| 20 | % |
Inventories
are comprised of the following at September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
Raw materials | |
$ | 1,939 | |
Finished goods | |
| 207 | |
Total inventories | |
$ | 2,146 | |
7. |
GOODWILL AND
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET |
Intangible
assets are comprised of the following at September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
Indefinite-lived intangible assets: | |
| |
Goodwill | |
$ | 1,733 | |
Trademarks | |
| 290 | |
Total indefinite-lived intangible assets | |
| 2,023 | |
| |
| | |
Finite-lived intangible assets: | |
| | |
Customer relationships | |
| 1,420 | |
Purchased backlog | |
| 990 | |
Total | |
| 2,410 | |
Less – accumulated amortization | |
| (842 | ) |
Total finite-lived intangible assets | |
| 1,568 | |
| |
| | |
Total intangible assets, net | |
$ | 3,591 | |
As
described in Note 3, we recorded goodwill of $5.4 million in connection with the KBS acquisition on April 2, 2014. We evaluated
the KBS goodwill for impairment at June 30, 2014 and determined it was impaired. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment charge
of $3.7 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2014 to reduce goodwill to its implied value of $1.7 million.
The
change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 is summarized below (in thousands):
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2013 | |
$ | — | |
Add – goodwill recorded on April 2, 2014 in connection
with KBS acquisition | |
| 5,438 | |
Subtract – goodwill impairment recorded at June
30, 2014 (included in earnings) | |
| (3,705 | ) |
| |
| | |
Goodwill balance at September 30, 2014 | |
$ | 1,733 | |
Amortization
expense amounted to $0.2 million and $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. Estimated
amortization of purchased intangible assets is as follows over the next five years (in thousands):
2014 (three months) | |
$ | 200 | |
2015 | |
| 303 | |
2016 | |
| 203 | |
2017 | |
| 203 | |
2018 | |
| 203 | |
Thereafter | |
| 456 | |
Total | |
$ | 1,568 | |
8. |
UNCOMPLETED
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS |
The
status of uncompleted construction contracts is as follows at September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts | |
$ | 17,296 | |
Inventory purchased for specific contracts | |
| 1,073 | |
Estimated profit | |
| 2,464 | |
| |
| 20,833 | |
Less billings to date | |
| (18,704 | ) |
Total | |
$ | 2,129 | |
| |
| | |
Included in the following balance sheet captions: | |
| | |
Costs and estimated profit in excess of billings | |
$ | 2,573 | |
Billings in excess of costs and estimated profit | |
| (444 | ) |
Total | |
$ | 2,129 | |
The
Company has approximately $11.1 million of work under contract remaining to be recognized at September 30, 2014.
9. |
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
RETAINAGE |
Accounts
payable of $5.3 million at September 30, 2014 includes retainage amounts due to subcontractors totaling $0.4 million.
On
April 2, 2014, as partial consideration for the KBS acquisition described in Note 3, we issued to the seller an unsecured promissory
note in the principal amount of $5.5 million, bearing interest at 4.0% per annum with all principal and interest due on October
1, 2014. On September 18, 2014 we entered into an agreement with the noteholder to extend the maturity date to December 1, 2014
with all other terms of the note remaining unchanged. The Company was unable to repay the note on that date and it remains unpaid
as of the date of this report. Under the terms of the note, the holder has a right to charge interest at 10.0% per annum for any
period during which we are in default, including from December 1, 2014 through the date of this report. The Company is seeking
to renegotiate the terms or obtain alternative financing to repay the note, but there can be no assurance we will be able to do
so under terms that are favorable to us or at all.
11. |
OTHER ACCRUED
LIABILITIES |
Other
accrued liabilities are comprised of the following (in thousands):
| |
September 30, 2014 | | |
December 31, 2013 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Accrued facility expenses (see Note 4) | |
$ | 226 | | |
$ | — | |
Accrued interest expense | |
| 326 | | |
| — | |
Accrued sales taxes | |
| 874 | | |
| — | |
Accrued health insurance costs | |
| 236 | | |
| — | |
Accrued sales rebates | |
| 251 | | |
| — | |
Accrued warranty | |
| 47 | | |
| — | |
Other | |
| 186 | | |
| 130 | |
Total other current accrued liabilities | |
$ | 2,146 | | |
$ | 130 | |
Changes
in accrued warranty are summarized below (in thousands):
| |
Three Months ended September 30, 2014 | | |
Nine Months ended September 30, 2014 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Accrual balance, beginning of period | |
$ | 52 | | |
$ | — | |
Accrual assumed in KBS acquisition | |
| — | | |
| 47 | |
Accruals for warranties | |
| 20 | | |
| 58 | |
Settlements made | |
| (25 | ) | |
| (58 | ) |
Accrual balance, end of period | |
$ | 47 | | |
$ | 47 | |
Long-term
debt consisted of the following at September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
April 2014 LSVI Promissory Note payable to related party, unsecured, interest of
10% per annum payable semi-annually in July and January, with any unpaid principal and interest due on April 1, 2019 (1) | |
$ | 6,000 | |
| |
| | |
LSVI Convertible Promissory Note payable to related party, unsecured, interest of 5% per annum
payable semi-annually in July and January, with any unpaid principal and interest due on April 1, 2019 (1) | |
| 500 | |
| |
| | |
Promissory Notes payable to related party, unsecured, interest of 10% per annum payable semi-annually
in July and January, with any unpaid principal and interest due on April 1, 2019 (2) | |
| 4,500 | |
| |
| | |
Notes payable, secured by equipment, interest rates from 5.0% to 9.5%,
with varying maturity dates through September 2018 | |
| 97 | |
| |
| | |
Total long-term debt | |
| 11,097 | |
Current portion | |
| (45 | ) |
Noncurrent portion | |
$ | 11,052 | |
|
(1) | In
order to finance the KBS acquisition described in Note 3, on April 1, 2014, we entered
into a Securities Purchase Agreement with LSVI pursuant to which it purchased for $6.5
million in cash, an unsecured promissory note made by ATRM in the principal amount of
$6.0 million (the “April 2014 LSVI Promissory Note”), bearing interest at
10.0% per annum, with interest payable semiannually and any unpaid principal and interest
due on April 1, 2019, and an unsecured convertible promissory note made by ATRM in the
principal amount of $0.5 million (the “LSVI Convertible Promissory Note”),
bearing interest at 5.0% per annum, with interest payable semiannually and any unpaid
principal and interest due on April 1, 2019. At any time after July 30, 2014, at LSVI’s
option, the unpaid principal amount of the LSVI Convertible Promissory Note could be
converted into shares of our common stock at $4.66 per share, the consolidated closing
bid price of our shares on the Nasdaq Capital Market on the trading date immediately
preceding the date the note was issued. As described in Note 15, on October 7, 2014 the
LSVI Convertible Promissory Note was converted into 107,297 shares of the Company’s
common stock. ATRM may prepay the April 2014 LSVI Promissory Note at any time after a
specified amount of advance notice to LSVI. |
On
May 9, 2014, as provided for in the Securities Purchase Agreement, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration
Rights Agreement”) with LSVI. The Registration Rights Agreement provides LSVI with certain demand and piggyback registration
rights, effective at any time after July 30, 2014, with respect to the shares of our common stock issuable upon the conversion
of the LSVI Convertible Promissory Note.
|
(2) | In
order to provide additional working capital to ATRM, we entered into two Securities Purchase
Agreements with LSV Co-Invest pursuant to which it purchased unsecured promissory notes
made by ATRM. Each of the notes bears interest at 10.0% per annum, with interest payable
semiannually in January and July and any unpaid principal and interest is due on April
1, 2019. Except for the principal amounts, the terms of these promissory notes are identical
to the terms of the April 2014 LSVI Promissory Note. The promissory notes issued to LSV
Co-Invest are listed below: |
|
● |
$2.5 million promissory
note dated July 21, 2014. |
|
|
|
|
● |
$2.0 million promissory
note dated September 19, 2014 |
LSVI
owned 60,588 shares of our common stock as of September 30, 2014. Following the conversion of the LSVI Convertible Promissory
Note on October 7, 2014, LSVI owned 167,885 shares of our common stock, or approximately 14.1% of our outstanding shares. LSVI
was granted a waiver under our Tax Benefits Preservation Plan to permit the purchase and conversion of the LSVI Convertible Promissory
Note.
Jeffrey
E. Eberwein, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Lone Star Value Management,
LLC, the investment manager of LSVI, and is the manager of Lone Star Value Investors GP, LLC, the general partner of LSVI and
LSV Co-Invest.
ATRM’s
entry into the securities purchase agreements with LSVI and LSV Co-Invest were approved by a Special Committee of our Board of
Directors consisting solely of independent directors.
13. |
STOCK INCENTIVE
PLAN AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION |
The
following table summarizes stock option activity under our stock incentive plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2014:
| |
Number of Shares | | |
Weighted Average Exercise Price | | |
Weighted Average Remaining Contract Term | | |
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) | |
Outstanding, January 1, 2014 | |
| 88,384 | | |
$ | 10.96 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Options forfeited | |
| (7,601 | ) | |
| 7.75 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Options expired | |
| (42,283 | ) | |
| 10.33 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Outstanding, September 30, 2014 | |
| 38,500 | | |
$ | 12.27 | | |
| 2.20
years | | |
$ | 0 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercisable, September 30, 2014 | |
| 38,500 | | |
$ | 12.27 | | |
| 2.20
years | | |
$ | 0 | |
All
stock options outstanding at September 30, 2014 are nonqualified options that expire at varying dates through November 2017. The
aggregate intrinsic values in the table above are zero because the option exercise prices for all outstanding options exceeded
ATRM’s closing stock price on September 30, 2014.
ATRM
uses the fair value method to measure and recognize share-based compensation. We determine the fair value of share-based awards
on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and recognize the compensation expense on a straight-line basis
over the vesting period of the applicable awards.
Share-based
compensation expense included in our condensed consolidated statements of operations was as follows (in thousands):
| |
Three months ended
September 30, | | |
Nine months ended
September 30, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Cost of sales | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | |
Selling, general and administrative | |
| — | | |
| 5 | | |
| — | | |
| 78 | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | |
| — | | |
| 8 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 94 | |
Total share-based compensation expense | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 13 | | |
$ | 5 | | |
$ | 172 | |
We
record the benefit we will derive in future accounting periods from tax losses and credits and deductible temporary differences
as “deferred tax assets.” We record a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying value of our deferred tax assets
if, based on all available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Since 2009, we have maintained a valuation allowance to fully reserve our deferred tax assets. We recorded a full valuation allowance
in 2009 because we determined there was not sufficient positive evidence regarding our potential for future profits to outweigh
the negative evidence of our three year cumulative loss position at that time. We expect to continue to maintain a full valuation
allowance until we determine that we can sustain a level of profitability that demonstrates our ability to realize these assets.
To the extent we determine that the realization of some or all of these benefits is more likely than not based upon expected future
taxable income, a portion or all of the valuation allowance will be reversed. Such a reversal would be recorded as an income tax
benefit and, for some portion related to deductions for stock option exercises, an increase in shareholders’ equity. We
are presenting a $464,000 income tax benefit on the statement of operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014.
The presented benefit is an offset to the tax provision effect we are presenting within discontinued operations for the same time
period.
On
October 7, 2014, LSVI converted the $0.5 million LSVI Convertible Promissory Note described in Note 12 into 107,297 shares of
the Company’s common stock.
On
October 10, 2014, as disclosed in Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, we received a payment of $0.4 million
from Cascade Microtech, Inc. (“Cascade”) in settlement of all remaining amounts owed to us related to the sale of
our reliability test product line to Cascade.
On
December 30, 2014 we repaid $1.0 million principal amount of the April 2014 LSVI Promissory Note described in Note 12, which reduced
the principal amount owing under such note to $5.0 million at December 31, 2014. The Company subsequently issued a new promissory
note for $1.0 million to LSVI on February 25, 2015 as described below.
On
January 23, 2015, as disclosed in Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, we received a payment of approximately
$0.8 million from Boston Semi Automation LLC, or BSA, for royalties earned during the period April 22, 2014 through December 31,
2014 in connection with the transfer of our test handler product line to BSA.
On
February 25, 2015, in order to provide additional working capital to ATRM, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with
LSVI pursuant to which LSVI purchased an unsecured promissory note made by ATRM in the principal amount of $1.0 million. The note
bears interest at 10.0% per annum, with interest payable semiannually in January and July and any unpaid principal and interest
is due on April 1, 2019. Except for the principal amount, the terms of the promissory note are identical to the terms of the April
2014 LSVI Promissory Note.
Jeffrey
E. Eberwein, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Lone Star Value Management,
LLC, the investment manager of LSVI, and is the manager of Lone Star Value Investors GP, LLC, the general partner of LSVI.
ATRM’s
entry into the securities purchase agreement with LSVI was approved by a Special Committee of our Board of Directors consisting
solely of independent directors.
ATRM HOLDINGS, INC.
Item 2. | | Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and
analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto,
and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. All figures
in the following discussion are presented on a consolidated basis. All dollar amounts and percentages presented herein have been
rounded to approximate values.
Forward-Looking Statements
The following management’s
discussion and analysis includes “forward-looking statements”, as such term is used within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These “forward-looking statements” are not based on historical fact and
involve assessments of certain risks, developments, and uncertainties in our business looking to the future. Such forward-looking
statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”,
“anticipate”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue”, or “believe”, or the
negatives or other variations of these terms or comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements may include projections, forecasts,
or estimates of future performance and developments. Forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
are based upon assumptions and assessments that we believe to be reasonable as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Whether those assumptions and assessments will be realized will be determined by future factors, developments, and events, which
are difficult to predict and may be beyond our control. Actual results, factors, developments, and events may differ materially
from those we assumed and assessed. Risks, uncertainties, contingencies, and developments, including those discussed in this Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and those identified in “Risk Factors” in
Item 1A in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014, our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the
period ended June 30, 2014 and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, could cause our future
operating results to differ materially from those set forth in any forward-looking statement. There can be no assurance that any
such forward-looking statement, projection, forecast or estimate contained can be realized or that actual returns, results, or
business prospects will not differ materially from those set forth in any forward-looking statement.
Given these uncertainties, readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligation to update any such factors
or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future
results, events or developments.
Recent Developments
Prior to April 2014, ATRM was a
manufacturer of a variety of equipment used in the semiconductor industry. In July 2013, we sold the assets related to our reliability
test (“RTP”) line of products to Cascade Microtech, Inc., a semiconductor equipment manufacturer based in Beaverton,
Oregon (“Cascade”), and in April 2014 we transferred our test handler product line to Boston Semi Automation LLC,
a semiconductor equipment company based in Boston, Massachusetts (“BSA”). On April 2, 2014, we purchased substantially
all of the assets of KBS Building Systems, Inc. and certain of its affiliates related to its business of manufacturing, selling,
and distributing modular housing units for residential and commercial use. Our wholly-owned subsidiaries, KBS Builders, Inc. and
Maine Modular Haulers, Inc. (collectively “KBS”), operate the acquired business. Following these transactions, KBS
represents ATRM’s sole operating business. Operating results related to the RTP and test handler product lines have been
reclassified and presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Unless otherwise indicated, the following management
discussion and analysis refers to continuing operations only, since comparison to prior periods would not be meaningful.
Overview
The Company’s KBS operation
manufactures modular buildings for commercial and residential applications. Commercial buildings include apartments, condominiums,
townhouses, dormitories, hospitals, office buildings and other structures. The buildings are manufactured in two production facilities
located in South Paris and Waterford, Maine.
The KBS strategy is to offer top
quality products for both commercial and residential buildings with a focus on customization to suit the project requirements.
Our production strategy is to maintain and grow the resources necessary to build a variety of commercial and residential buildings.
We attempt to utilize the most efficient methods of manufacturing and high quality materials in all of our projects.
KBS’s customers include builders,
general contractors and owners of commercial buildings. Except for a small number that are sold directly, single family homes
are sold by a network of non-exclusive dealers and contractors in New England. Many of these dealers and contractors have KBS
model homes on display at their retail centers. Our sales team works to attract new architects and contractors in New England
who need the flexibility that KBS offers. Our competitive strategy is to offer a superior product unique to the project’s
requirements, provide value with our engineering and design expertise, and provide the product in the timeframe needed by the
customer.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The Company’s critical accounting
policies are disclosed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and as updated in our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2014 as a result of our acquisition of the assets and liabilities
related to the operations of KBS and the divestiture of our test handler product line.
Results of Operations
Net Sales. Net sales were
$22.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, which included sales of $12.4 million and $10.3 million for the three
month periods ended June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014, respectively. Sales of commercial structures and single family homes
represented approximately 61% and 39% of total net sales, respectively, for the period April 2, 2014 through September 30, 2014.
Net sales from continuing operations were zero for the comparable periods of the prior year as we divested the operating businesses
we owned in 2013.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales
amounted to $9.8 million and $21.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, compared with
zero for the same periods in the prior year as we divested the operating businesses we owned in 2013.
Selling, General and Administrative.
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 were $4.4 million
compared with $2.1 million for the comparable period in 2013, an increase of $2.3 million. Approximately $2.1 million of the increase
was attributable to KBS operations which we acquired on April 2, 2014, including $1.3 million of KBS operating expenses and $0.8
million of amortization expense related to the acquired intangible assets. In addition, our expenses for professional services
increased approximately $0.5 million over the same period in the prior year primarily due to costs associated with the acquisition
of KBS and the divestiture of our test handler product line which was partially off-set by lower compensation expenses. SG&A
expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2014 were $1.1 million compared with $0.6 million for the comparable period
in 2013, an increase of $0.5 million. Approximately $0.8 million of the increase was attributable to our acquisition of KBS, including
$0.6 million of KBS operating expenses and $0.2 million of amortization expense related to the acquired intangible assets which
were partially offset by decreases in compensation expense and professional fees.
Goodwill Impairment Charge.
We completed a goodwill impairment assessment at June 30, 2014 and determined that the carrying value of goodwill exceeded
its fair value by $3.7 million at that date. Accordingly, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge in the amount of $3.7 million
in the quarter ended June 30, 2014.
Change in Fair Value of Contingent
Earn-Out. Change in fair value of contingent earn-out of $0.1 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 represented
an increase in the fair value of the earn-out receivable related to the sale of our RTP line of products. The increase in the
earn-out receivable was based on reassessments of its fair value at March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014 and resulted from our analysis
of updated revenue information reported to us by the purchaser of the business and final settlement of this contingency.
Interest Expense. Interest
expense amounted to $0.3 million and $0.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, and consisted
of interest related to the debt we incurred to finance the KBS acquisition in April 2014 as described in Note 12 to our unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements. Interest income for all periods presented and interest expense for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2013 were not significant.
Income Taxes. Since 2009,
we have maintained a valuation allowance to fully reserve our deferred tax assets. We expect to continue to maintain a full valuation
allowance until we determine that we can sustain a level of profitability that demonstrates our ability to realize these assets.
To the extent we determine that the realization of some or all of these benefits is more likely than not based upon expected future
taxable income, a portion or all of the valuation allowance will be reversed. Such a reversal would be recorded as an income
tax benefit and, for some portion related to deductions for stock option exercises, an increase in shareholders’ equity.
We recorded no income tax expense or benefit for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. The income
tax expense attributed to discontinued operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014, calculated using a 35% marginal
tax rate, is offset by a corresponding income tax benefit for continuing operations.
Discontinued Operations.
In July 2013 we sold the assets related to our RTP line of products to Cascade and in April 2014 we transferred our test handler
product line to BSA. In accordance with ASC 205-20, “Discontinued Operations,” results related to RTP and test
handler operations have been reclassified and presented as discontinued operations for all periods reported. Condensed results
of discontinued operations are summarized in Note 4 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents increased
by approximately $0.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
Cash flows used in operating
activities. In the nine months ended September 30, 2014, cash flows used in operating activities were $4.6 million, consisting
primarily of our net loss of $7.0 million (excluding a $1.1 million pre-tax gain on the sale of our test handler product line)
and approximately $2.1 million in working capital changes, partially offset by a $3.7 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge
and $1.0 million in non-cash depreciation and amortization expense. Working capital changes using cash included increases of $0.6
million in accounts receivable and $2.0 million in costs and estimated profit in excess of billings and a decrease of $1.3 million
in accounts payable, partially offset by decreases of $0.5 million in inventories and $0.3 million in other current assets and
a $1.0 million increase in other accrued liabilities. The increase in accounts receivable and costs and estimated profit in excess
of billings were primarily attributed to three new commercial projects started in the quarter ended September 30, 2014. The decrease
in accounts payable reflected increased payments to suppliers after we received additional debt financing in July and September
of 2014. The decrease in inventories was primarily attributed to the sale of seven VMAX test handlers prior to the
transfer of our test handler product line to BSA in April 2014. The increase in other accrued liabilities included increases of
$0.2 million in accrued facility expenses, $0.3 million in accrued sales taxes and $0.3 million in accrued interest expense. In
the nine months ended September 30, 2013, cash flows used in operating activities were $2.6 million, consisting primarily of our
net loss of $3.8 million (excluding a $1.0 million pre-tax gain on the sale of our RTP product line) and $0.2 million in working
capital changes, partially offset by $1.4 million in non-cash expenses. Non-cash expenses included charges for excess and obsolete
inventories of $1.2 million and share-based compensation expense of $0.2 million. Working capital changes using cash included
a $0.2 million increase in accounts receivable, a $0.2 million decrease in accrued compensation, and a $0.2 million decrease in
other accrued liabilities, partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in inventories and a $0.2 million increase in accounts
payable.
Cash flows generated by (used
in) investing activities. In the nine months ended September 30, 2014, cash flows used in investing activities were approximately
$4.3 million, which consisted of the $4.6 million net cash portion of the purchase price paid in connection with our acquisition
of KBS ($5.0 million paid at closing less $0.4 million of cash acquired), partially offset by approximately $0.4 million received
in final settlement of the contingent earn-out in connection with our sale of our RTP product line to Cascade. In the nine months
ended September 30, 2013, cash generated from investing activities amounted to $1.6 million, consisting primarily of the net proceeds
from the sale of our RTP product line in July 2013.
Cash flows provided by financing
activities. In the nine months ended September 30, 2014, cash flows generated by financing activities were approximately $9.6
million, which consisted primarily of the $11.0 million in financing received from the sale of promissory notes as described in
Note 12 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, less $1.4 million of KBS debt that was assumed and paid
at the closing of the KBS transaction. Cash flows used in financing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were
not significant.
Historically, we have supported
our capital expenditure and working capital needs with cash generated from operations, debt financings and our existing cash and
cash equivalents. In recent years, we have incurred significant losses that have been primarily attributed to the operations of
our test handler product line and significant legal expenses related to litigation. Since July of 2013, we implemented several
strategic initiatives intended to stabilize the Company and return us to profitability, including the sales of our RTP product
line in July 2013 and our test handler product line in April 2014. Also in April 2014, we acquired KBS, a business that manufactures
modular housing units for commercial and residential applications, because we believe there is significant growth opportunity
within the industry and it provides ATRM with the potential to return to profitability. We are working to implement strategies
to improve profitability at KBS, including management changes and the implementation of improved processes, operating and financial
reporting and controls. However, there can be no assurance that the acquisition of KBS will lead to sufficient revenue in the
future to cover our expenses and allow us to achieve profitability, on a consistent basis or at all.
As of September 30, 2014, our cash
on hand amounted to $1.9 million and our interest-bearing debt totaled $16.6 million. As of the date of this report, our interest-bearing
debt totaled approximately $16.1 million, including a $5.5 million promissory note held by the seller in the KBS acquisition (the
“KBS Note”), $6.0 million owed to Lone Star Value Investors, LP (“LSVI”) and $4.5 million owed to Lone
Star Value Co-Invest I, LP (“LSV Co-Invest”). This indebtedness is described in detail in Note 12 to our unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company is largely dependent on LSVI and LSV Co-Invest to fund its working capital
needs. We intend to pursue new financing to replace the KBS Note and all or a portion of the debt owing to LSVI and LSV Co-Invest
and to provide for our general working capital needs. However, there can be no assurance that our existing cash reserves, together
with funds generated by our operations and any future financings, will be sufficient to meet our net cash requirements. In addition,
in order to execute our long-term growth strategy, which may include additional acquisitions, we may need to raise additional
funds through public or private equity offerings, debt financings, or other means.
Item
3. |
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Not applicable
Item
4. |
|
Controls and
Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered
by this report, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures,
our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, with the participation of the Company’s management, concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2014, to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (a) recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (b) accumulated and communicated to management,
including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Description of Material Weakness
As discussed in Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations above and Notes 3 and 4 to our accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements, in April 2014 we acquired the assets and liabilities related to the operations of KBS and transferred
our test handler product line to BSA. As a result, the KBS business currently represents our primary business activity. Prior
to the acquisition, the KBS operations were a privately-owned business with very limited administrative and accounting resources,
outdated accounting software and generally weak accounting processes and internal control procedures. Due to the lack of adequate
processes, procedures and controls at KBS, management concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were
not effective as of September 30, 2014 and we have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.
Remediation of Material Weakness
We are working to improve the processes,
procedures and controls at KBS and remediate this material weakness. Since the acquisition of KBS in April 2014, we have implemented
improvements in processes, procedures and controls and we will continue to do so. Also, in July 2014, we hired an additional accounting
professional with relevant experience to assist in the effort to implement improvements at KBS. We will disclose in future
periods the progress we have made in efforts to remediate this material weakness.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As a result of the KBS acquisition
that closed in the second quarter of 2014 and the generally weak controls at KBS discussed above, we determined that we have a
material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. We are working to remediate this material weakness as
discussed above.
It should be noted that any system
of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives
of the system will be met. In designing and operating a control system, one must consider the potential benefits of controls relative
to their costs and the reality of limited resources available to allocate to control activities, particularly in smaller companies.
In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events
and there can be no assurance that any control will meet its objectives under all potential future conditions. Because of
such inherent limitations in any control system, there can be no absolute assurance that control issues, misstatements, and/or
fraud will be prevented or detected.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
As reported in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, we are subject to litigation captioned UTHE Technology Corporation vs. Aetrium
Incorporated et al. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On September 13, 2013 the
court entered final judgment dismissing all remaining claims UTHE Technology Corporation (“UTHE”) asserted against
us in the litigation. On September 23, 2013, UTHE appealed the district court judgment to the United States Court of Appeal for
the Ninth Circuit. The appeal is currently pending.
Not applicable.
|
Item 2. | Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None.
|
Item 3. | Defaults on
Senior Securities |
None.
|
Item 4. | Mine Safety
Disclosures |
None.
None.
|
4.1 |
Promissory Note,
dated July 21, 2014. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 25, 2014) |
|
4.2 |
Promissory Note,
dated September 19, 2014. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 22,
2014) |
|
10.1 |
Securities Purchase
Agreement, dated July 21, 2014, by and between ATRM Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Aetrium Incorporated) and Lone Star Value Co-Invest
I, LP. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 25, 2014) |
|
10.2 |
Securities Purchase
Agreement, dated September 19, 2014, by and between ATRM Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Aetrium Incorporated) and Lone Star Value Co-Invest
I, LP. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 22, 2014) |
|
31.1 |
Certification of Principal Executive
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
Certification of Principal Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
Certification pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
101.INS * |
XBRL Instance Document |
|
101.SCH * |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
|
101.CAL * |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation
Linkbase |
|
101.DEF * |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition
Linkbase |
|
101.LAB * |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
|
101.PRE * |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation
Linkbase |
* Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation
S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be “filed”
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section, and shall not be deemed part of a registration statement, prospectus or other document filed under Sections 11 or 12
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of those sections, except as shall be expressly
set forth by specific reference in such filings.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
ATRM HOLDINGS, INC. |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
Date:
April 21, 2015 |
By: |
/s/ Daniel
M. Koch |
|
|
Daniel M. Koch |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
Date: April
21, 2015 |
By: |
/s/ Paul H. Askegaard |
|
|
Paul H. Askegaard |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
4.1 |
Promissory Note,
dated July 21, 2014. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 25, 2014) |
|
4.2 |
Promissory Note,
dated September 19, 2014. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 22,
2014) |
|
10.1 |
Securities Purchase
Agreement, dated July 21, 2014, by and between ATRM Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Aetrium Incorporated) and Lone Star Value Co-Invest
I, LP. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 25, 2014) |
|
10.2 |
Securities Purchase
Agreement, dated September 19, 2014, by and between ATRM Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Aetrium Incorporated) and Lone Star Value Co-Invest
I, LP. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 22, 2014) |
|
31.1 |
Certification of Principal Executive
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
Certification of Principal Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
Certification pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
101.INS * |
XBRL Instance Document |
|
101.SCH * |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
|
101.CAL * |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation
Linkbase |
|
101.DEF * |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition
Linkbase |
|
101.LAB * |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
|
101.PRE * |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation
Linkbase |
*
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed part of a registration statement, prospectus or
other document filed under Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability
of those sections, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filings.
Exhibit 31.1
Certification
of the Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Daniel M. Koch, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of ATRM Holdings, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2014; |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report; |
| 3. | Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| 4. | The registrant’s
other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control
over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
| 5. | The registrant’s
other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions): |
(a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Date: April 21,
2015 |
/s/
Daniel M. Koch |
|
Daniel M. Koch |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 31.2
Certification
of the Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Paul H. Askegaard, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of ATRM Holdings, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2014; |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report; |
| 3. | Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| 4. | The registrant’s
other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control
over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
| 5. | The registrant’s
other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions): |
(a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Date: April 21,
2015 |
/s/
Paul H. Askegaard |
|
Paul H. Askegaard |
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of
ATRM Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Daniel M. Koch, as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Paul H. Askegaard, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
| (1) | the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and |
| (2) | the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. |
Date: April 21, 2015 |
/s/ Daniel M. Koch |
|
Daniel M. Koch
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
Date: April 21, 2015 |
/s/ Paul H. Askegaard |
|
Paul H. Askegaard
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) |