ADVFN - Advanced Financial Network.
HOME» NASDAQ » A » AAPL Stock Price » AAPL Stock News

Apple Share News

 Apple Inc. (mm) Stock Price
AAPL Stock Price
 Apple Inc. (mm) Stock Chart
AAPL Stock Chart
 Apple Inc. (mm) Stock News
AAPL Stock News
 Apple Inc. (mm) Company Information
AAPL Company Information
 Apple Inc. (mm) Stock Trades
AAPL Stock Trades

CORRECT: Lawmakers Concerned That Some Patent Holders Stifle Competition

"Lawmakers Concerned That Some Patent Holders Stifle Competition," at 3:21 p.m. EDT, incorrectly suggested in the third paragraph that Apple and Microsoft were among the companies that have come under scrutiny for trying to prevent rivals from using standard-essential patents. The correct version follows: By Andrew Seidman WASHINGTON--U.S. lawmakers Wednesday expressed concern that companies holding patents important to an entire industry are stifling competition and innovation by using courts and government agencies to limit use of the technologies. So-called standard-essential patents, such as 3G wireless technology in telecommunications, are crucial for entire industries. Companies with those patents typically license them to competitors, but at times companies limit the ability of others to use an important technological development. Google Inc. (GOOG) recently come under scrutiny for trying to prevent rivals from selling products using standard-essential patent technologies. Patent ligitation practices of other companies, including Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) efforts to protect proprietary technologies, have also been reviewed by government officials. Instead of filing patent-infringement cases in U.S. federal courts, some companies are increasingly seeking relief from the International Trade Commission, an independent federal agency that can block the sale or import of infringing products. The ITC can issue exclusion orders even if the company that holds a standard-essential patent already agreed to license it. "When inventors and developers are willing to license their technologies to one another at reasonable rates, the cross-fertilization of ideas benefits us all," Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D., Vt.) said Wednesday. "But I am concerned that the recent trend of seeking exclusion orders from the International Trade Commission, rather than negotiating and seeking license fees, may have the opposite effect." Sen. Michael Lee (R., Utah) also voiced skepticism, suggesting that an agreement to license a standard-essential patent is a commitment to nonexclusivity. "If so, doesn't that arguably make an exclusion order inappropriate in this circumstance? In other words, once somebody has agreed to nonexclusivity, is an exclusion order an appropriate remedy?" he said. Edith Ramirez, a commissioner for the Federal Trade Commission, said that patent holders might use such orders to "hold up or demand higher royalties" from competitors. Ms. Ramirez told the committee that the ITC has the authority to prevent hold-ups through its public interest obligations. "If the ITC finds that its public interest authority is not flexible enough to prevent hold-up, then Congress should consider whether legislative remedies are necessary," she wrote in prepared testimony. Such practices also could harm consumers, said Joseph Wayland, acting assistant attorney general in the Justice Department's antitrust division. "Blocking a particular cellphone application could cause consumer harm across millions and millions of people," he said. Write to Andrew Seidman at andrew.seidman@dowjones.com

Stock News for Apple (AAPL)
DateTimeHeadline
06/30/201516:00:03Amazon's Hidden Internet of Things Advantage
06/30/201515:22:03Apple Music Could Be a Major Win for Investors in Apple Inc...
06/30/201513:23:00Apple Loses Federal Appeal in E-Books Case -- 3rd Update
06/30/201512:41:00Hagens Berman: Court Affirms Potential $450 Million Settlement...
06/30/201512:18:25Apple Loses Federal Appeal in E-Books Case -- 2nd Update
06/30/201511:53:14Apple Loses Federal Appeal in E-Books Case -- Update
06/30/201511:00:06Apple Loses Federal Appeal in E-Books Case
06/30/201511:00:02Did LG Solve Apple Watch’s Biggest Problem?
06/30/201510:50:30Apple Loses Federal Appeal in E-Books Case
06/30/201510:00:02Why Twitter Inc. Is Investing Heavily In Artificial Intelligence
06/30/201503:40:08Sony Plans $3.6 Billion Stock, Bond Offering
06/30/201502:56:12Imagination Technologies Fiscal Year Pretax Loss Widens as Investment...
06/29/201520:04:11High Expectations Play in Background of Apple Music's Debut
06/29/201516:57:028 Charts to Celebrate the iPhone's 8th Birthday
06/29/201515:04:02Apple's Next iPhone: Get Ready to Say Goodbye to This Option
06/29/201511:48:03Apple’s iTunes U 3.0 Reboot Could Boost Struggling iPad Sales
06/29/201510:31:03How Adblock Extensions Are Draining Google Inc's Revenue
06/28/201512:40:02Here’s One Area Where Samsung’s Galaxy S6 Beats Apple’s iPhon...
06/27/201511:10:02New Details Of Apple Inc.'s Retail Revival Emerge
06/26/201518:34:45Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4)

Apple Computer and other NASDAQ stock quotes are delayed by at least 20 minutes.
All other stock price and quote data is delayed by at least 15 minutes unless otherwise stated. By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Contact Us | Copyright 1999-2007 ADVFN PLC. | Privacy Policy | Investment Warning | Data accreditations | Investor Relations

ADVFNADVFN ItalyADVFN GermanyADVFN FranceADVFN BrazilADVFN JapanADVFN UKADVFN US noad