ADVFN - Advanced Financial Network.
HOME» NASDAQ » A » AAPL Stock Price » AAPL Stock News

Apple Share News

 Apple Inc. (mm) Stock Price
AAPL Stock Price
 Apple Inc. (mm) Stock Chart
AAPL Stock Chart
 Apple Inc. (mm) Stock News
AAPL Stock News
 Apple Inc. (mm) Company Information
AAPL Company Information
 Apple Inc. (mm) Stock Trades
AAPL Stock Trades

CORRECT: Lawmakers Concerned That Some Patent Holders Stifle Competition

"Lawmakers Concerned That Some Patent Holders Stifle Competition," at 3:21 p.m. EDT, incorrectly suggested in the third paragraph that Apple and Microsoft were among the companies that have come under scrutiny for trying to prevent rivals from using standard-essential patents. The correct version follows: By Andrew Seidman WASHINGTON--U.S. lawmakers Wednesday expressed concern that companies holding patents important to an entire industry are stifling competition and innovation by using courts and government agencies to limit use of the technologies. So-called standard-essential patents, such as 3G wireless technology in telecommunications, are crucial for entire industries. Companies with those patents typically license them to competitors, but at times companies limit the ability of others to use an important technological development. Google Inc. (GOOG) recently come under scrutiny for trying to prevent rivals from selling products using standard-essential patent technologies. Patent ligitation practices of other companies, including Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) efforts to protect proprietary technologies, have also been reviewed by government officials. Instead of filing patent-infringement cases in U.S. federal courts, some companies are increasingly seeking relief from the International Trade Commission, an independent federal agency that can block the sale or import of infringing products. The ITC can issue exclusion orders even if the company that holds a standard-essential patent already agreed to license it. "When inventors and developers are willing to license their technologies to one another at reasonable rates, the cross-fertilization of ideas benefits us all," Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D., Vt.) said Wednesday. "But I am concerned that the recent trend of seeking exclusion orders from the International Trade Commission, rather than negotiating and seeking license fees, may have the opposite effect." Sen. Michael Lee (R., Utah) also voiced skepticism, suggesting that an agreement to license a standard-essential patent is a commitment to nonexclusivity. "If so, doesn't that arguably make an exclusion order inappropriate in this circumstance? In other words, once somebody has agreed to nonexclusivity, is an exclusion order an appropriate remedy?" he said. Edith Ramirez, a commissioner for the Federal Trade Commission, said that patent holders might use such orders to "hold up or demand higher royalties" from competitors. Ms. Ramirez told the committee that the ITC has the authority to prevent hold-ups through its public interest obligations. "If the ITC finds that its public interest authority is not flexible enough to prevent hold-up, then Congress should consider whether legislative remedies are necessary," she wrote in prepared testimony. Such practices also could harm consumers, said Joseph Wayland, acting assistant attorney general in the Justice Department's antitrust division. "Blocking a particular cellphone application could cause consumer harm across millions and millions of people," he said. Write to Andrew Seidman at andrew.seidman@dowjones.com

Stock News for Apple (AAPL)
DateTimeHeadline
12/18/201417:10:33Deezer Names New CEO Before Full U.S. Launch
12/18/201413:37:25Falling Oil Prices Don't Give Clean-Energy Stocks the All-Clear
12/17/201420:17:47Banks Find Niche Helping Firms Defend Against Activists
12/17/201417:20:34Asia Corporate Watch
12/16/201421:10:27Plunging Ruble Poses Test for Putin -- Update
12/16/201417:59:28TECH STOCKS: Google Leads Tech Stocks Lower
12/16/201417:04:28Google Cuts Patent Deal With Verizon--Update
12/16/201416:05:37Apple Gets Favorable Jury Verdict In iPod Trial--2nd Update
12/16/201414:39:19Apple Halts Online Sales in Russia -Bloomberg
12/16/201414:26:15Apple Gets Favorable Jury Verdict In iPod Trial--Update
12/16/201413:57:34Apple Wins iPod Antitrust Trial
12/16/201411:16:16Google, Verizon Enter Patent Agreement
12/16/201405:42:05Imagination to Restrain Cost Growth, Shares Jump
12/15/201416:56:10Bankruptcy Court Approves GT Advanced Settlement With Apple
12/15/201416:06:08Justice Department Faces Tough Questioning in E-Books Case...
12/15/201413:34:02Justice Department Faces Tough Questioning in E-Books Case
12/15/201408:18:21Correction to Xiaomi Invests in Chinese Home-Appliance Maker...
12/14/201423:48:14Xiaomi Invests in Chinese Home Appliance Maker Midea
12/14/201417:19:15Apple Heads to Court Monday in E-Book Appeal
12/12/201418:39:54Canadian Probe Zeros in on Apple's Contracts With Phone Companies

Apple Computer and other NASDAQ stock quotes are delayed by at least 20 minutes.
All other stock price and quote data is delayed by at least 15 minutes unless otherwise stated. By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Contact Us | Copyright 1999-2007 ADVFN PLC. | Privacy Policy | Investment Warning | Data accreditations | Investor Relations

ADVFNADVFN ItalyADVFN GermanyADVFN FranceADVFN BrazilADVFN JapanADVFN UKADVFN US noad