ADVFN - Advanced Financial Network.
HOME» NASDAQ » A » AAPL Stock Price » AAPL Stock News

Apple Share News

 Apple Inc. (mm) Stock Price
AAPL Stock Price
 Apple Inc. (mm) Stock Chart
AAPL Stock Chart
 Apple Inc. (mm) Stock News
AAPL Stock News
 Apple Inc. (mm) Company Information
AAPL Company Information
 Apple Inc. (mm) Stock Trades
AAPL Stock Trades

CORRECT: Lawmakers Concerned That Some Patent Holders Stifle Competition

"Lawmakers Concerned That Some Patent Holders Stifle Competition," at 3:21 p.m. EDT, incorrectly suggested in the third paragraph that Apple and Microsoft were among the companies that have come under scrutiny for trying to prevent rivals from using standard-essential patents. The correct version follows: By Andrew Seidman WASHINGTON--U.S. lawmakers Wednesday expressed concern that companies holding patents important to an entire industry are stifling competition and innovation by using courts and government agencies to limit use of the technologies. So-called standard-essential patents, such as 3G wireless technology in telecommunications, are crucial for entire industries. Companies with those patents typically license them to competitors, but at times companies limit the ability of others to use an important technological development. Google Inc. (GOOG) recently come under scrutiny for trying to prevent rivals from selling products using standard-essential patent technologies. Patent ligitation practices of other companies, including Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) efforts to protect proprietary technologies, have also been reviewed by government officials. Instead of filing patent-infringement cases in U.S. federal courts, some companies are increasingly seeking relief from the International Trade Commission, an independent federal agency that can block the sale or import of infringing products. The ITC can issue exclusion orders even if the company that holds a standard-essential patent already agreed to license it. "When inventors and developers are willing to license their technologies to one another at reasonable rates, the cross-fertilization of ideas benefits us all," Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D., Vt.) said Wednesday. "But I am concerned that the recent trend of seeking exclusion orders from the International Trade Commission, rather than negotiating and seeking license fees, may have the opposite effect." Sen. Michael Lee (R., Utah) also voiced skepticism, suggesting that an agreement to license a standard-essential patent is a commitment to nonexclusivity. "If so, doesn't that arguably make an exclusion order inappropriate in this circumstance? In other words, once somebody has agreed to nonexclusivity, is an exclusion order an appropriate remedy?" he said. Edith Ramirez, a commissioner for the Federal Trade Commission, said that patent holders might use such orders to "hold up or demand higher royalties" from competitors. Ms. Ramirez told the committee that the ITC has the authority to prevent hold-ups through its public interest obligations. "If the ITC finds that its public interest authority is not flexible enough to prevent hold-up, then Congress should consider whether legislative remedies are necessary," she wrote in prepared testimony. Such practices also could harm consumers, said Joseph Wayland, acting assistant attorney general in the Justice Department's antitrust division. "Blocking a particular cellphone application could cause consumer harm across millions and millions of people," he said. Write to Andrew Seidman at [email protected]

Stock News for Apple (AAPL)
DateTimeHeadline
02/24/201718:31:45Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4)
02/23/201709:02:46COBI -Motion Entertainment Brings Groundbreaking Technology To...
02/22/201718:33:22Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4)
02/22/201712:21:00Apple to Open New Campus in April
02/22/201712:14:00Apple to Open New Campus in April
02/22/201708:30:00Apple Park Opens to Employees in April
02/17/201718:32:18Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4)
02/17/201718:31:16Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4)
02/17/201708:29:00BeatsX Review: If Apple's AirPods Aren't Your Thing
02/16/201710:36:00Visa Wants Your Car to Pay for Gas at the Pump
02/16/201708:30:00WWDC, Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference, returns to San J...
02/15/201708:42:46Prospectus Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2) (424b2)
02/15/201708:30:00Omni-Channel Payment Processors Embrace the Times
02/15/201703:02:00Berkshire Boosted Apple Bet Before Rise -- WSJ
02/14/201719:12:00Berkshire Hathaway Discloses Increased Stake in Apple
02/14/201717:49:00David Tepper Increases Wagers On Drug Companies
02/14/201709:11:59Free Writing Prospectus - Filing Under Securities Act Rules 163/433...
02/14/201706:13:30Prospectus Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2) (424b2)
02/13/201719:10:00Apple Shares Hit All-Time Closing High as Investors Await Next...
02/13/201716:36:00Apple Shares Hit All-Time Closing High as Investors Await Next...

Apple Computer and other NASDAQ stock quotes are delayed by at least 20 minutes.
All other stock price and quote data is delayed by at least 15 minutes unless otherwise stated. By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Contact Us | Copyright 1999-2016 ADVFN PLC. | Privacy Policy | Investment Warning | Data accreditations | Investor Relations

ADVFNADVFN ItalyADVFN GermanyADVFN FranceADVFN BrazilADVFN JapanADVFN UKADVFN US